Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NFDN 2006 Chapter 1 Answers To Case Studies in Textbook
NFDN 2006 Chapter 1 Answers To Case Studies in Textbook
Think About It
1. What information would you need to explore in your new community in order to identify the
possibility of health inequities? Provide rationales for your choices.
ANSWERS
1. Health inequities can be understood by exploring the relationship of employment, housing,
income, food security, education and other determinants and social determinants to health status
and outcomes. Key social determinants can create inequities that can and should be addressed
through social and environmental considerations (addressing the concerns as individual health
problems is, at best, a band aid to a much larger wound).
While Geoff refuses to be hospitalized, the concern is not for his welfare (he is not refusing
treatment) but for the welfare of the public’s health. Temporarily restricting Geoff’s freedom by
arranging for his treatment in hospital would be for the prevention of harm to others. If the
restriction were only for the perceived welfare of Geoff as an individual, it would be considered
paternalistic and a violation of the harm principle.
Think About It
1. Is there a way to find a compromise?
2. How can Kristin explain the ethical rationale for hospital treatment to Geoff in a way that
preserves his dignity?
3. How can Kristin maintain Geoff’s dignity even if she has to exercise power over him to get
treatment in hospital for the public good?
ANSWERS
1. In this case Geoff may be willing to receive treatment, but will still need to be monitored. If
there is capacity within the health centre for Geoff to be treated with home care follow-up, there
may be a feasible compromise. He must, however, be treated with minimal exposure of
vulnerable others in the community.
2. Kristin can explain that because of the public health consequences of this illness, hospital
treatment—even if not Geoff’s preference—may be the best public health treatment, a short-term
solution with longer-term benefits for managing this infectious disease.
3. If Geoff is not willing to work with a compromise, and is posing a risk to public health, Kristin
could initiate treatment in hospital by promoting the idea of a self-initiated admission versus an
imposed admission. If there is a forced public health concerned admission, Kristin, could support
Geoff through the admission, and liaise with the hospital staff so they can better understand
Geoff’s reluctance and suspiciousness. In this way, the CHN can act in a mediator role.
Think About It
1. Reflecting on possible levels of intervention—upstream, midstream, and downstream—how
could Kristin address this issue?
ANSWERS
1. Upstream, Kristin could consider collaborating with the regional housing societies and
agencies to communicate the costs to these individuals and the community due to a lack of
affordable housing.
Midstream, Kristin could consider education and support for cold and respiratory prevention
(such as handwashing and other strategies) for the seasonal workers in the community.
Downstream Kristin could address this issue with treatments for cold and respiratory
irritation.
Think About It
1. What levels of prevention do medical follow-up, smoking cessation and moderate exercise
reflect?
ANSWERS
1. Medical follow-up reflects a tertiary level of prevention for COPD; smoking cessation reflects
a secondary level of prevention—or preventing worsening of a disease or condition such as
COPD; and moderate exercise reflects a primary level of prevention.
has added to community prosperity. It has also led to an increase in transient workers and greater
disposable income for people in the town—with added concerns of substance use and violence in
the community.
Think About It
1. To what extent do you think that practices of collaboration can be used in Kristin’s CHN
practice in Houston to address her current concerns?
ANSWERS
1. Answers will vary—with different rationales.