POPULATION EDT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE (WITH CBMS O

HAZARD
BARANGAY Tsunami Likelihood of
Magnitude Score
Susceptibility Occurrence Score
A B C E

Magnitude scores are

relative to the
Thru Anecdotal Account magnitude of the
Low, Moderate, High
(Score range 1-6) highest level of hazard
category (see Scoring
tab)

Low 6 1
DOLO Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
Low 6 1
KINALANSAN Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
Low 6 1
SABANG Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
Low 6 1
TAGAS Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
RISE (WITH CBMS OR HOUSEHOLD-LEVEL DATA)
EXPOSURE

Barangay Population Number of HH Affected Population Affected HH Exposure Percentage

F G L M N

Number of HH of from CBMS

Total Population of the brgy Fr CBMS, corresponds to
the brgy cluster corresponds to the M/G
cluster (PSA, CBMS) the No. of HH Heads
(PSA, CBMS) Family Members

2,174 465 86 18 3.87%

2,174 465 86 18 3.87%
2,174 465 86 18 3.87%
2,138 505 5 2 0.40%
2,138 505 5 2 0.40%
2,138 505 5 2 0.40%
2,686 590 83 18 3.05%
2,686 590 83 18 3.05%
2,686 590 83 18 3.05%
1892 424 70 14 3.30%
1892 424 70 14 3.30%
1892 424 70 14 3.30%
ATA)
Percentage living in dwelling units made
Exposure Score Percentage of Informal Settlers (IS) from light materials or salvageable Percentage of young an
materials
O P Q R S T U V

No. of
No. of HH No. of
No.of exposed exposed
Number of accounted as IS accounted HH
Exposure Score Sensitivity Score HH living in light Sensitivity Score young and
exposed IS divided affected divided by
materials old
HH affected HH
dependents

1 14 77.78% 4 8 57.14% 4 500

1 14 77.78% 4 8 57.14% 4 500
1 14 77.78% 4 8 57.14% 4 500
1 1 50.00% 4 0 0.00% 1 35
1 1 50.00% 4 0 0.00% 1 35
1 1 50.00% 4 0 0.00% 1 35
1 27 150.00% 4 5 18.52% 3 180
1 27 150.00% 4 5 18.52% 3 180
1 27 150.00% 4 5 18.52% 3 180
1 0 0.00% 1 12 0.00% 1 210
1 0 0.00% 1 12 0.00% 1 210
1 0 0.00% 1 12 0.00% 1 210
 SENSITIVITY
Percentage of persons with Percentage below the Poverty
Percentage of young and old dependents
disabilities Threshold
W X Y Z AA AB AC AD

No. of No.of
accounted exposed HH No. of
No. of accounted No. of
individuals living accounted HH
individuals divided by Sensitivity Score exposed Sensitivity Score Sensitivity Score
divided by below divided by
affected population PWDs
affected Poverty affected HH
population Threshold

6250.00% 4 4 0.80% 1 14 350.00% 4

6250.00% 4 4 0.80% 1 14 350.00% 4
6250.00% 4 4 0.80% 1 14 350.00% 4
0.00% 1 1 2.86% 1 1 100.00% 4
0.00% 1 1 2.86% 1 1 100.00% 4
0.00% 1 1 2.86% 1 1 100.00% 4
3600.00% 4 4 2.22% 1 27 675.00% 4
3600.00% 4 4 2.22% 1 27 675.00% 4
3600.00% 4 4 2.22% 1 27 675.00% 4
1750.00% 4 4 1.90% 1 12 300.00% 4
1750.00% 4 4 1.90% 1 12 300.00% 4
1750.00% 4 4 1.90% 1 12 300.00% 4
 Access to
Percentage Malnourished infrastructure- Access to financial
Average Sensitivity Score
Individuals related mitigation assistance
measures
AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL

No. of
No. of Proportion
accounted Proportion
exposed Adaptive of HH with Adaptive
individuals Rounded up average sensitivity of HH with
malnou- Sensitivity Score Capacity access to Capacity
divided by score access to
rished Score financial Score
affected measures
individuals assistance
population

2 14.29% 3 4 80.00% 4 90.00% 4

2 14.29% 3 4 80.00% 4 90.00% 4
2 14.29% 3 4 80.00% 4 90.00% 4
1 100.00% 4 3 80.00% 4 90.00% 4
1 100.00% 4 3 80.00% 4 90.00% 4
1 100.00% 4 3 80.00% 4 90.00% 4
7 25.93% 4 4 95.00% 4 90.00% 4
7 25.93% 4 4 95.00% 4 90.00% 4
7 25.93% 4 4 95.00% 4 90.00% 4
15 125.00% 4 3 95.00% 4 90.00% 4
15 125.00% 4 3 95.00% 4 90.00% 4
15 125.00% 4 3 95.00% 4 90.00% 4
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Capacity and
Government
willingness to Access to information Average Adaptive Capacity Score
investments
retrofit or relocate
AM AN AO AP AQ AR AS
Capacity of
government
to make
Proportion
Adaptive Proportion of HH Adaptive investments Adaptive
of HH that Rounded down average adaptive capacity
Capacity with access to Capacity in CCA-DRR Capacity
are capable/ score
Score information Score (low, Score
willing
moderate,
high, very
high)

50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3

50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
50.00% 4 90.00% 4 high 3 3
 VULNERABILITY Severity of
Consequence
Hazard Exposure Score Risk Score
Vulnerability Index Vulnerability Score Score

AT AU AV AW AX

Rounded up the Severity of

Magnitude Score multiply to
Exposure Score
Vulenrability Scores are
product of Hazard Consequence
Sensitivity Score divided based on the calculated
ExposureScore multiply
by Adaptive Capacity Score Vulenrability Index (see
and Vulnerability to likelihood
Scoring tab)
Score of Occurrence

1 1.33333333333333 0.75 1.00 6.00

1 1.33333333333333 0.75 1.00 6.00
1 1.33333333333333 0.75 1.00 6.00
1 1 0.50 1.00 6.00
1 1 0.50 1.00 6.00
1 1 0.50 1.00 6.00
1 1.33333333333333 0.75 1.00 6.00
1 1.33333333333333 0.75 1.00 6.00
1 1.33333333333333 0.75 1.00 6.00
1 1 0.50 1.00 6.00
1 1 0.50 1.00 6.00
1 1 0.50 1.00 6.00
 Risk
Category

AY

see Scoring Tab

moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
POPULATION EDT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE (WITH CBMS O
HAZARD
BARANGAY Tsunami Likelihood of
Magnitude Score
Susceptibility Occurrence Score
A B C E

Magnitude scores are

relative to the
Thru Anecdotal Account magnitude of the
Low, Moderate, High
(Score range 1-6) highest level of hazard
category (see Scoring
tab)

Low 6 1
DOLO Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
Low 6 1
KINALANSAN Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
Low 6 1
SABANG Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
Low 6 1
TAGAS Moderate 6 1
High 6 1
RISE (WITH CBMS OR HOUSEHOLD-LEVEL DATA)
EXPOSURE

Barangay Population Number of HH Affected Population Affected HH Exposure Percentage

F G L M N

Number of HH of from CBMS

Total Population of the brgy Fr CBMS, corresponds to
the brgy cluster corresponds to the M/G
cluster (PSA, CBMS) the No. of HH Heads
(PSA, CBMS) Family Members

2,174 465 86 18 3.87%

2,174 465 86 18 3.87%
2,174 465 86 18 3.87%
2,138 505 5 2 0.40%
2,138 505 5 2 0.40%
2,138 505 5 2 0.40%
2,686 590 83 18 3.05%
2,686 590 83 18 3.05%
2,686 590 83 18 3.05%
1892 424 70 14 3.30%
1892 424 70 14 3.30%
1892 424 70 14 3.30%
ATA)
BARANGAY Percentage living in dwelling units made
Exposure Score Percentage of Informal Settlers (IS) from light materials or salvageable
materials
O A P Q R S T

No. of HH No. of
No.of exposed
Number of accounted as IS accounted HH
Exposure Score Sensitivity Score HH living in light
exposed IS divided affected divided by
materials
HH affected HH

1 14 77.78% 4 8 57.14%
1 DOLO 14 77.78% 4 8 57.14%
1 14 77.78% 4 8 57.14%
1 1 50.00% 4 0 0.00%
1 KINALANSAN 1 50.00% 4 0 0.00%
1 1 50.00% 4 0 0.00%
1 27 150.00% 4 5 18.52%
1 SABANG 27 150.00% 4 5 18.52%
1 27 150.00% 4 5 18.52%
1 0 0.00% 1 12 0.00%
1 TAGAS 0 0.00% 1 12 0.00%
1 0 0.00% 1 12 0.00%
 SENSITIVITY
g in dwelling units made
Percentage of persons with Percentage below the Pove
aterials or salvageable Percentage of young and old dependents
disabilities Threshold
materials
U V W X Y Z AA AB

No. of No.of
No. of
accounted exposed HH
exposed No. of accounted No. of
individuals living
Sensitivity Score young and individuals divided by Sensitivity Score exposed Sensitivity Score
divided by below
old affected population PWDs
affected Poverty
dependents
population Threshold

4 500 6250.00% 4 4 0.80% 1 14

4 500 6250.00% 4 4 0.80% 1 14
4 500 6250.00% 4 4 0.80% 1 14
1 35 0.00% 1 1 2.86% 1 1
1 35 0.00% 1 1 2.86% 1 1
1 35 0.00% 1 1 2.86% 1 1
3 180 3600.00% 4 4 2.22% 1 27
3 180 3600.00% 4 4 2.22% 1 27
3 180 3600.00% 4 4 2.22% 1 27
1 210 1750.00% 4 4 1.90% 1 12
1 210 1750.00% 4 4 1.90% 1 12
1 210 1750.00% 4 4 1.90% 1 12
Percentage below the Poverty Percentage Malnourished
Average Sensitivity Score
Threshold Individuals
AC AD AE AF AG AH

No. of
No. of
No. of accounted
exposed
accounted HH individuals Rounded up average sensitivity
Sensitivity Score malnou- Sensitivity Score
divided by divided by score
rished
affected HH affected
individuals
population

350.00% 4 2 14.29% 3 4
350.00% 4 2 14.29% 3 4
350.00% 4 2 14.29% 3 4
100.00% 4 1 100.00% 4 3
100.00% 4 1 100.00% 4 3
100.00% 4 1 100.00% 4 3
675.00% 4 7 25.93% 4 4
675.00% 4 7 25.93% 4 4
675.00% 4 7 25.93% 4 4
300.00% 4 15 125.00% 4 3
300.00% 4 15 125.00% 4 3
300.00% 4 15 125.00% 4 3
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Access to
BARANGAY Capacity and
infrastructure- Access to financial
willingness to Access to information
related mitigation assistance
retrofit or relocate
measures
A AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP

Proportion
Proportion Proportion
Adaptive of HH with Adaptive Adaptive Proportion of HH Adaptive
of HH with of HH that
Capacity access to Capacity Capacity with access to Capacity
access to are capable/
Score financial Score Score information Score
measures willing
assistance

80.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4

DOLO 80.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
80.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
80.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
KINALANSAN 80.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
80.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
95.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
SABANG 95.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
95.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
95.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
TAGAS 95.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
95.00% 4 90.00% 4 50.00% 4 90.00% 4
CAPACITY VULNERABILITY
Government Hazard Exposure Score
Average Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Index
investments
AQ AR AS AT AU
Capacity of
government
to make
investments Adaptive
Rounded down average adaptive capacity Magnitude Score multiply to Sensitivity Score divided
in CCA-DRR Capacity
score Exposure Score by Adaptive Capacity Score
(low, Score
moderate,
high, very
high)

high 3 3 1 1.33333333333333
high 3 3 1 1.33333333333333
high 3 3 1 1.33333333333333
high 3 3 1 1
high 3 3 1 1
high 3 3 1 1
high 3 3 1 1.33333333333333
high 3 3 1 1.33333333333333
high 3 3 1 1.33333333333333
high 3 3 1 1
high 3 3 1 1
high 3 3 1 1
VULNERABILITY Severity of
Consequence Risk
Risk Score
Vulnerability Score Score Category

AV AW AX AY

Rounded up the Severity of

Vulenrability Scores are
product of Hazard Consequence
based on the calculated
ExposureScore multiply see Scoring Tab
Vulenrability Index (see
and Vulnerability to likelihood
Scoring tab)
Score of Occurrence

0.75 1.00 6.00 moderate

0.75 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.75 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.50 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.50 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.50 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.75 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.75 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.75 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.50 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.50 1.00 6.00 moderate
0.50 1.00 6.00 moderate
URBAN USE SEA LEVEL RISE
HAZARD

Land Use Category Storm Surge Likelihood of

Susceptibility Occurrence Score

Barangay

Commercial, Residential, Industrial, Tourism, Low, Moderate, Thru Anecdotal Account

Open Space, Agri-industrial, etc. High (Score range 1-6)

Residential Zone
Commmercial Zone
Del Carmen (Pob.) Institutional Zone
Utilities, Transportation and Services Zone
Agricultural Zone
Residential Zone
Institutional Zone
San Juan (Pob.)
Agricultural Zone
Commercial Zone
Residential Zone
Agricultural Zone
Industrial Zone
San Antonio (Pob.)
Commercial Zone
Institutional Zone
Utilities, Transportation and Services Zone
Residential Zone
Institutional Zone
Agri-Industrial Zone
Soledad (Pob.)
Agricultural Zone
Utilities, Transportation and Services Zone
Cemetery
Residential Zone
San Vicente (Pob.) Institutional Zone
Commercial Zone
Residential Zone
Institutional Zone
Santa Cruz (Pob.) Agricultural Zone
Commercial Zone
Industrial Zone
ZARD EXPOSURE

Magnitude Total Barangay Allocation Affected Area (Hectares) Replacement Cost per
Score in Hectares (GIS Derived) Sq.Meter (PHP)

Average construction/
Magnitude scores
replacement cost per
are relative to the Total land area allocated per
Calculated land area exposed to classification (can be
magnitude of the
urban land use category percentage of average cost
highest level of
(hectares) hazard areas (hectares) based on expected loss from
hazard category
hazard, e.g. 15% of
(see Scoring tab)
construction cost)

10.7224 0
0.3352 0
5.5563 0
0.0037 0
9.696 0
9.4294 0
0.2641 0
5.6758 0
3.4829 0
10.1186 0
15.9128 0
0.0158 0
0.6602 0
0.6156 0
0.0092 0
11.192 0
0.0022 0
0.0478 0
19.3862 0
0.0092 0
0.6552 0
1.2649 0
2.5538 0
1.9353 0
11.5783 0
0.0898 0
23.746 0
0.4304 0
0.0508 0
 EXPOSURE
Percentage of
%
Affected Value Exposure Score for Exposure Score for Average building walls with
Exposure
(PHP) Affected Value Affected Area Exposure Score light to salvageable
materials

Est.
percentage
Affected Area
Exposure Score Sum of exposure of light
Replacement Cost X Exposure Score for Affected divided by Total
proportion of affected scores divided by 2 structures
Affected Area X 10000 Value (optional) Barangay
area (optional) out of
Allocation
affected
structures

0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
 SENSITIVITY
Percentage of Percentage of buildings Percentage of Percentage of
building walls with in buildings structures not Average
light to salvageable dilapidated/condemene constructed before employing resilient Sensitivity Score
materials d Condition 1992 building design

Estimated Estimated
Est. percentage of
percentage percentage
dilapidated/
of buildings of structres
Sensitivity condemned Sensitivity Sensitivity Sensitivity Rounded up average
built before not
Score buildings out of Score Score Score sensitivity score
1972 employing
affected
affected resilient
structures
structures design

1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Percentage of structures
with no access/area
Capacity and willingness
coverage to Local Awareness Insurance Coverage
to retrofit or relocate
infrastructure related
mitigation measures

Est. percentage of Est. percentage of Est.

Est. percentage
Adaptive owners aware and Adaptive owners with Adaptive percentage Adaptive
covered by
Capacity provided information Capacity capacity and Capacity of property Capacity
infrastructure-
Score on hazards and climate Score willingness to Score covered by Score
related measures change retrofit/ relocate insurance

1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Government Regulations
Available Alternative on hazard mitigation Average Adaptive
Government Investments
Sites/Structures zoning and structural Capacity Score
design standards

Presence and
Capacity of Availability of adherence to
government to make Adaptive land/alternative Adaptive government Adaptive
Rounded down average
investments in CCA- Capacity sites (low, Capacity regulations(A, B, C, Capacity
DRR (low, moderate, adaptive capacity score
Score moderate, high, Score D - see Score
high, very high) very high) classification in
scoring tab)

FALSE FALSE FALSE 0

FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
FALSE FALSE FALSE 0
 VULNERABILITY
Severity of
Consequence Risk Risk
Hazard Exposure Score Vulnerability Vulnerability Score Score Category
Index Score

Vulenrability Scores Severity of

Rounded up the
Sensitivity Score are based on the Consequence
Magnitude Score multiply to product of Hazard see Scoring
divided by Adaptive calculated multiply
Exposure Score ExposureScore and Tab
Capacity Score Vulenrability Index to likelihood
Vulnerability Score
(see Scoring tab) of Occurrence

0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00 none

0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00 none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00 none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00 none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00 none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00 none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
URBAN USE SEA LEVEL RISE
HAZARD

Land Use Category Storm Surge Likelihood of

Susceptibility Occurrence Score

Barangay

Commercial, Residential, Industrial, Tourism, Low, Moderate, Thru Anecdotal Account

Open Space, Agri-industrial, etc. High (Score range 1-6)

Residential Zone
Commmercial Zone
Del Carmen (Pob.) Institutional Zone
Utilities, Transportation and Services Zone
Agricultural Zone
Residential Zone
Institutional Zone
San Juan (Pob.)
Agricultural Zone
Commercial Zone
Residential Zone
Agricultural Zone
Industrial Zone
San Antonio (Pob.)
Commercial Zone
Institutional Zone
Utilities, Transportation and Services Zone
Residential Zone
Institutional Zone
Agri-Industrial Zone
Soledad (Pob.)
Agricultural Zone
Utilities, Transportation and Services Zone
Cemetery
Residential Zone
San Vicente (Pob.) Institutional Zone
Commercial Zone
Residential Zone
Institutional Zone
Santa Cruz (Pob.) Agricultural Zone
Commercial Zone
Industrial Zone
ZARD EXPOSURE

Magnitude Total Barangay Allocation Affected Area (Hectares) Replacement Cost per
Score in Hectares (GIS Derived) Sq.Meter (PHP)

Average construction/
Magnitude scores
replacement cost per
are relative to the Total land area allocated per
Calculated land area exposed to classification (can be
magnitude of the
urban land use category percentage of average cost
highest level of
(hectares) hazard areas (hectares) based on expected loss from
hazard category
hazard, e.g. 15% of
(see Scoring tab)
construction cost)

10.7224 0
0.3352 0
5.5563 0
0.0037 0
9.696 0
9.4294 0
0.2641 0
5.6758 0
3.4829 0
10.1186 0
15.9128 0
0.0158 0
0.6602 0
0.6156 0
0.0092 0
11.192 0
0.0022 0
0.0478 0
19.3862 0
0.0092 0
0.6552 0
1.2649 0
2.5538 0
1.9353 0
11.5783 0
0.0898 0
23.746 0
0.4304 0
0.0508 0
 EXPOSURE
%
Affected Value Exposure Score for Exposure Score for Average
Exposure
(PHP) Affected Value Affected Area Exposure Score

Affected Area
Exposure Score Sum of exposure
Replacement Cost X Exposure Score for Affected divided by Total
proportion of affected scores divided by 2
Affected Area X 10000 Value (optional) Barangay
area (optional)
Allocation

0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
0 0 0.00% 0 0
 SENSITIVITY
Percentage of Percentage of buildings Percentage of Percentage of
building walls with in buildings structures not
light to salvageable dilapidated/condemene constructed before employing resilient
materials d Condition 1992 building design

Barangay Est. Estimated Estimated

Est. percentage of
percentage percentage percentage
dilapidated/
of light of buildings of structres
Sensitivity condemned Sensitivity Sensitivity
structures built before not
Score buildings out of Score Score
out of 1972 employing
affected
affected affected resilient
structures
structures structures design

1 1 1
1 1 1
Del Carmen (Pob.) 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
San Juan (Pob.)
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
San Antonio (Pob.)
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
Soledad (Pob.)
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
San Vicente (Pob.) 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
Santa Cruz (Pob.) 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
 ADAPT
Percentage of structures
Percentage of
with no access/area
structures not Average Capacity and willingness
coverage to Local Awareness
employing resilient Sensitivity Score to retrofit or relocate
infrastructure related
building design
mitigation measures

Est. percentage of Est. percentage of

Est. percentage
Adaptive owners aware and Adaptive owners with Adaptive
Sensitivity Rounded up average covered by
Capacity provided information Capacity capacity and Capacity
Score sensitivity score infrastructure-
Score on hazards and climate Score willingness to Score
related measures change retrofit/ relocate

1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Government Regulations
Available Alternative on hazard mitigation
Insurance Coverage Government Investments
Sites/Structures zoning and structural
design standards

Presence and
Est. Capacity of Availability of adherence to
percentage Adaptive government to make Adaptive land/alternative Adaptive government Adaptive
of property Capacity investments in CCA- Capacity sites (low, Capacity regulations(A, B, C, Capacity
covered by Score DRR (low, moderate, Score moderate, high, Score D - see Score
insurance high, very high) very high) classification in
scoring tab)

1 FALSE FALSE FALSE

1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE FALSE
 VULNERABILITY

Average Adaptive Hazard Exposure Score Vulnerability Vulnerability

Capacity Score Index Score

Barangay
Vulenrability Scores
Sensitivity Score are based on the
Rounded down average Magnitude Score multiply to
divided by Adaptive calculated
adaptive capacity score Exposure Score
Capacity Score Vulenrability Index
(see Scoring tab)

0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 Del Carmen (Pob.) 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
San Juan (Pob.)
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
San Antonio (Pob.)
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Soledad (Pob.)
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 San Vicente (Pob.) 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 Santa Cruz (Pob.) 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
 Severity of
Consequence Risk Risk
Score Score Category

Severity of
Rounded up the
Consequence
product of Hazard see Scoring
multiply
ExposureScore and Tab
to likelihood
Vulnerability Score
of Occurrence

0.00 0.00 none

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0.00 0.00 none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0.00 0.00 none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0.00 0.00 none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0.00 0.00 none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
0.00 0.00 none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! none
NATURAL RESOURCE-BASED PRODUCTION AREAS SE
HAZARD

Barangay Classification
Total
Likelihoo
Barangay
Storm Surge d of Magnitud
Area
susceptibility Occurren e Score
Allocatio
ce Score
n

Magnitude
scores are
General relative to
Total land
classification or use the
area per
of the area magnitude
Low, Moderate, Anecdotal classificatio
(fisheries, of the
High Account n in a given
agriculture, highest level
cluster (in
livestock, forest of hazard
hectares)
plantation, etc.) category
(see Scoring
tab)

Annual Crop High 3 1 351.96

CALALAHAN
Livestock High 3 1
Annual Crop High 3 1 39.49
Livestock High 3 1
DOLO Fishpond High 3 1 2.04
Mangrove
3 1
Forest High 138.82
Annual Crop High 3 1 140.16
KINALANSAN
Livestock High 3 1
Annual Crop High 3 1 111.88
MANZANA
Livestock High 3 1
Annual Crop High 3 1 202.73
Livestock High 3 1
MINORO
Mangrove
3 1
Forest High 3.18
Mangrove
SABANG 3 1
Forest High 351.96
Annual Crop High 3 1 158.08
Fishpond High 3 1 1.91
TAGAS Livestock High 3 1
Mangrove
3 1
Forest High 3.22
Livestock High 3 1
TELEGRAFO
Annual Crop High 3 1 140.84
PRODUCTION AREAS SEA LEVEL RISE
EXPOSURE

Affected Exposure
Average Affected Exposure
Value Score for
Varieties produced output per Area Percentag
(PHP) Affected
hectare (PHP) (Hectares) e
Value

Calculated land
Exposure
Annual area exposed Average Total brgy
Score for
Existing crop and fish varieties and forest products being production to a hazard output/ha X agricultural
Affected
produced (specify) output per area (GIS- affected area ÷
Value
hectare derived in area affected area
(optional)
hectares)

RICE 100,000.00 6.8739 687390 1 1.95%

Hog/ Chicken/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 6.6528 665280 1 16.85%
Hog/ Chicken/ Duck/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
BANGUS/TILAPIA 40,000.00 0.6247 24988 1 30.62%

0 0 27.87%
MANGROVE 38.6843
RICE 100,000.00 12.6745 1267450 1 9.04%
Hog/ Chicken/ Duck/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 8.9819 898190 1 8.03%
Hog/ Chicken/ Geese/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 12.0057 1200570 1 5.92%
Hog/ Chicken/ Duck/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%

0 0 17.15%
MANGROVE 0.5451
30 1 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 0.0003
RICE 100,000.00 12.8986 1289860 1 8.16%
BANGUS/TILAPIA 40,000.00 0.3916 15664 1 20.47%
Hog/ Chicken/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%

0 0 18.45%
MANGROVE 0.5946
Hog/ Chicken/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 4.5011 450110 1 3.20%
 SENSITIVITY
Total
Number
Percentage of
of Percentage of
affected areas
Exposure Depende Percentage of affected owners/areas not
Average without water Average
Score for nt HHs or areas without irrigation employing
Exposure impounding (for Sensitivit
Affected Families facilities (for agricultural sustainable
Score agricultural y Score
Area to croplands and ricelands) production
croplands and
affected techniques
ricelands)
areas
Percentage
of
owners/are
Estimated as not
Exposure
number of employing
Score
Sum of HHs Percentage of Percentage techniques
proportion Rounded up
exposure dependent affected areas of affected such as
of affected Sensitivity Sensitivity Sensitivity average
scores on natural with out areas with climate
area (<10%, Score Score Score sensitivity
divided by 2 resource- irrigation out irrigation proofing,
10%-20%, score
(optional) based facilities facilities using
20%-40%,
production climate
>40%)
areas resistant
crop
varieties,
etc.
1 1 0.020 1 75% 4 30% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 25% 3 3
2 1.5 0.168 2 50% 4 25% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 25% 3 3
3 2 0.306 3 100% 4 0% 1 1

3 1.5 3 1 2 2
0.279 15%
1 1 0.090 1 100% 4 35% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 35% 3 3
1 1 0.080 1 100% 4 20% 2 2
0 0 0.000 1 1 20% 2 2
1 1 0.059 1 100% 4 20% 2 2
0 0 0.000 1 1 20% 2 2

2 1 2 1 2 2
0.172 10%
1 1 1 4 3 3
0.000 75% 30%
1 1 0.082 1 60% 4 18% 2 2
3 2 0.205 3 100% 4 30% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 25% 3 3

2 1 2 1 2 2
0.184 15%
0 0 0.000 1 1 28% 3 3
1 1 0.032 1 70% 4 28% 3 3
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Percentage of
affected areas Percentage of
Percentage of Government
covered or production areas Percentage of areas
dependent HHs with Extension Programs
protected by hazard covered by post- with access to
access to alternative related to CCAM-
mitigation disaster economic information Institutional,
livelihood DRR
measures/structure protection financial
s and
technical
Percentage capacity to
Percentage of areas provide
Percentage
of areas with access local
of areas
Est. covered or to agriculture
covered by
percentage protected by information and
post-
of hazard (e.g. early forestry-
Adaptive Adaptive disaster Adaptive Adaptive Adaptive
dependent mitigation warning based
Capactity Capactity economic Capactity Capactity Capactity
HHs with measures system, extension
Score Score protection( ( Score Score Score
access to (e.g. slope local programs
e.g.
alternative protection, awareness such as
insurance.
livelihood seawall, on climate technology
micro-
flood change and and
finance)
control, etc.) natural knowledge
hazards) transfer
(low,
4 1 4 4 moderate, 3
30% 0% 90% 75% high
high, very
30% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate
high) 2
25% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 high 3
25% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate 2
25% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 high 3

4 1 4 4 2
25% 0% 90% 75% moderate
35% 4 78% 4 90% 4 50% 4 high 3
35% 4 1 90% 4 50% 4 moderate 2
20% 4 50% 4 90% 4 75% 4 high 3
20% 4 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate 2
20% 4 50% 4 90% 4 75% 4 high 3
20% 4 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate 2

4 1 4 4 2
20% 0% 90% 75% moderate
4 1 4 4 3
30% 0% 90% 75% high
25% 4 60% 4 90% 4 80% 4 high 3
25% 4 40% 4 90% 4 80% 4 high 3
25% 4 1 90% 4 80% 4 moderate 2

4 1 4 4 2
25% 0% 90% 80% moderate
28% 4 1 90% 4 80% 4 moderate 2
28% 4 50% 4 90% 4 80% 4 high 3
 VULNERABILITY
Severity
Hazard
of Risk Risk
Exposure
Conseque Score Category
Government Average Score
nce Score
Infrastructure Adaptive Vulnerabi Vulnerabi
Projects related to Capacity lity Index lity Score
CCAM-DRR Score

Institutional,
financial
and
technical Vulenrabilit
Rounded up Severity of
capacity to Rounded Sensitivity y Scores are
Magnitude the product Consequenc
implement down Score based on
Adaptive Score of Hazard e
hazard average divided by the
Capactity multiply to ExposureSco multiply see Scoring Tab
mitigation adaptive Adaptive calculated
Score Exposure re and to likelihood
infrastructur capacity Capacity Vulenrabilit
Score Vulnerabilit of
e project score Score y Index (see
y Score Occurrence
(low, Scoring tab)
moderate,
high, very
high)

high 3 3 1 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L

high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 2 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 3 0.333333 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
3 2 3 1 0.50 moderate
high 2.00 6.00 M
high 3 3 1 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 1 0.666667 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1 0.50 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 1 0.666667 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1 0.50 0.00 0.00 none

3 2 2 1 0.50 low
high 1.00 3.00 L
3 3 1 1 0.50 low
high 1.00 3.00 L
high 3 3 1 0.666667 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 3 3 1 0.50 2.00 6.00 moderate M
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none

3 2 2 1 0.50 low
high 1.00 3.00 L
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 1 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
NATURAL RESOURCE-BASED PRODUCTION AREAS SE
HAZARD

Barangay Classification
Total
Likelihoo
Barangay
Storm Surge d of Magnitud
Area
susceptibility Occurren e Score
Allocatio
ce Score
n

Magnitude
scores are
General relative to
Total land
classification or use the
area per
of the area magnitude
Low, Moderate, Anecdotal classificatio
(fisheries, of the
High Account n in a given
agriculture, highest level
cluster (in
livestock, forest of hazard
hectares)
plantation, etc.) category
(see Scoring
tab)

Annual Crop High 3 1 351.96

CALALAHAN
Livestock High 3 1
Annual Crop High 3 1 39.49
Livestock High 3 1
DOLO Fishpond High 3 1 2.04
Mangrove
3 1
Forest High 138.82
Annual Crop High 3 1 140.16
KINALANSAN
Livestock High 3 1
Annual Crop High 3 1 111.88
MANZANA
Livestock High 3 1
Annual Crop High 3 1 202.73
Livestock High 3 1
MINORO
Mangrove
3 1
Forest High 3.18
Mangrove
SABANG 3 1
Forest High 351.96
Annual Crop High 3 1 158.08
Fishpond High 3 1 1.91
TAGAS Livestock High 3 1
Mangrove
3 1
Forest High 3.22
Livestock High 3 1
TELEGRAFO
Annual Crop High 3 1 140.84
PRODUCTION AREAS SEA LEVEL RISE
EXPOSURE

Affected Exposure
Average Affected Exposure
Value Score for
Varieties produced output per Area Percentag
(PHP) Affected
hectare (PHP) (Hectares) e
Value

Calculated land
Exposure
Annual area exposed Average Total brgy
Score for
Existing crop and fish varieties and forest products being production to a hazard output/ha X agricultural
Affected
produced (specify) output per area (GIS- affected area ÷
Value
hectare derived in area affected area
(optional)
hectares)

RICE 100,000.00 6.8739 687390 1 1.95%

Hog/ Chicken/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 6.6528 665280 1 16.85%
Hog/ Chicken/ Duck/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
BANGUS/TILAPIA 40,000.00 0.6247 24988 1 30.62%

0 0 27.87%
MANGROVE 38.6843
RICE 100,000.00 12.6745 1267450 1 9.04%
Hog/ Chicken/ Duck/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 8.9819 898190 1 8.03%
Hog/ Chicken/ Geese/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 12.0057 1200570 1 5.92%
Hog/ Chicken/ Duck/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%

0 0 17.15%
MANGROVE 0.5451
30 1 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 0.0003
RICE 100,000.00 12.8986 1289860 1 8.16%
BANGUS/TILAPIA 40,000.00 0.3916 15664 1 20.47%
Hog/ Chicken/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%

0 0 18.45%
MANGROVE 0.5946
Hog/ Chicken/ Goat/ Cattle/ Carabao 0 0 0.00%
RICE 100,000.00 4.5011 450110 1 3.20%
 SENSITIVITY
Total
Number
Percentage of
of Percentage of
affected areas
Exposure Depende Percentage of affected owners/areas not
Average without water Average
Score for nt HHs or areas without irrigation employing
Exposure impounding (for Sensitivit
Affected Families facilities (for agricultural sustainable
Score agricultural y Score
Area to croplands and ricelands) production
croplands and
affected techniques
ricelands)
areas
Percentage
of
owners/are
Estimated as not
Exposure
number of employing
Score
Sum of HHs Percentage of Percentage techniques
proportion Rounded up
exposure dependent affected areas of affected such as
of affected Sensitivity Sensitivity Sensitivity average
scores on natural with out areas with climate
area (<10%, Score Score Score sensitivity
divided by 2 resource- irrigation out irrigation proofing,
10%-20%, score
(optional) based facilities facilities using
20%-40%,
production climate
>40%)
areas resistant
crop
varieties,
etc.
1 1 0.020 1 75% 4 30% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 25% 3 3
2 1.5 0.168 2 50% 4 25% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 25% 3 3
3 2 0.306 3 100% 4 0% 1 1

3 1.5 3 1 2 2
0.279 15%
1 1 0.090 1 100% 4 35% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 35% 3 3
1 1 0.080 1 100% 4 20% 2 2
0 0 0.000 1 1 20% 2 2
1 1 0.059 1 100% 4 20% 2 2
0 0 0.000 1 1 20% 2 2

2 1 2 1 2 2
0.172 10%
1 1 1 4 3 3
0.000 75% 30%
1 1 0.082 1 60% 4 18% 2 2
3 2 0.205 3 100% 4 30% 3 3
0 0 0.000 1 1 25% 3 3

2 1 2 1 2 2
0.184 15%
0 0 0.000 1 1 28% 3 3
1 1 0.032 1 70% 4 28% 3 3
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Percentage of
affected areas Percentage of
Percentage of Government
covered or production areas Percentage of areas
dependent HHs with Extension Programs
protected by hazard covered by post- with access to
access to alternative related to CCAM-
mitigation disaster economic information Institutional,
livelihood DRR
measures/structure protection financial
s and
technical
Percentage capacity to
Percentage of areas provide
Percentage
of areas with access local
of areas
Est. covered or to agriculture
covered by
percentage protected by information and
post-
of hazard (e.g. early forestry-
Adaptive Adaptive disaster Adaptive Adaptive Adaptive
dependent mitigation warning based
Capactity Capactity economic Capactity Capactity Capactity
HHs with measures system, extension
Score Score protection( ( Score Score Score
access to (e.g. slope local programs
e.g.
alternative protection, awareness such as
insurance.
livelihood seawall, on climate technology
micro-
flood change and and
finance)
control, etc.) natural knowledge
hazards) transfer
(low,
4 1 4 4 moderate, 3
30% 0% 90% 75% high
high, very
30% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate
high) 2
25% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 high 3
25% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate 2
25% 4 0% 1 90% 4 75% 4 high 3

4 1 4 4 2
25% 0% 90% 75% moderate
35% 4 78% 4 90% 4 50% 4 high 3
35% 4 1 90% 4 50% 4 moderate 2
20% 4 50% 4 90% 4 75% 4 high 3
20% 4 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate 2
20% 4 50% 4 90% 4 75% 4 high 3
20% 4 1 90% 4 75% 4 moderate 2

4 1 4 4 2
20% 0% 90% 75% moderate
4 1 4 4 3
30% 0% 90% 75% high
25% 4 60% 4 90% 4 80% 4 high 3
25% 4 40% 4 90% 4 80% 4 high 3
25% 4 1 90% 4 80% 4 moderate 2

4 1 4 4 2
25% 0% 90% 80% moderate
28% 4 1 90% 4 80% 4 moderate 2
28% 4 50% 4 90% 4 80% 4 high 3
 VULNERABILITY
Severity
Hazard
of Risk Risk
Exposure
Conseque Score Category
Government Average Score
nce Score
Infrastructure Adaptive Vulnerabi Vulnerabi
Projects related to Capacity lity Index lity Score
CCAM-DRR Score

Institutional,
financial
and
technical Vulenrabilit
Rounded up Severity of
capacity to Rounded Sensitivity y Scores are
Magnitude the product Consequenc
implement down Score based on
Adaptive Score of Hazard e
hazard average divided by the
Capactity multiply to ExposureSco multiply see Scoring Tab
mitigation adaptive Adaptive calculated
Score Exposure re and to likelihood
infrastructur capacity Capacity Vulenrabilit
Score Vulnerabilit of
e project score Score y Index (see
y Score Occurrence
(low, Scoring tab)
moderate,
high, very
high)

high 3 3 1 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L

high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 2 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 3 0.333333 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
3 2 3 1 0.50 moderate
high 2.00 6.00 M
high 3 3 1 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 1 0.666667 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1 0.50 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 1 0.666667 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 2 0 1 0.50 0.00 0.00 none

3 2 2 1 0.50 low
high 1.00 3.00 L
3 3 1 1 0.50 low
high 1.00 3.00 L
high 3 3 1 0.666667 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
high 3 3 3 1 0.50 2.00 6.00 moderate M
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none

3 2 2 1 0.50 low
high 1.00 3.00 L
high 3 2 0 1.5 0.75 0.00 0.00 none
high 3 3 1 1 0.50 1.00 3.00 low L
CRITICAL FACILITIES EDT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE
HAZARD

Barangay Type of Facility Name of Facility/ Description

Sea Level Rise

Susceptibility

school, hospital, rural health

unit
evacuation center, water-
Low, Moderate, High
related facility, power-related
facility, airport, seaport,
government offices

Dolo Port Dolo Port High

Sabang Port Sabang Port High
 HAZARD EXPO

Estimated
Likelihood of Total Area
Magnitude Score No. of Storeys Affected Area
Occurrence Score (sq.m.)
(sq.m.)

Magnitude scores are

relative to the
Thru Anecdotal
magnitude of the Total land area of Estimated land area
Account No. of Floors
highest level of hazard facility/ compound affected by hazard
(Score range 1-6)
category (see Scoring
tab)

3 0.5 1 10975.93 10975.934

3 0.5 1 400.00 400
 EXPOSURE

Exposure Score Unit Cost/ Exposure Score

% of Affected Area Affected Value
for Affected Area Replacement Cost for Affected Value

Estimated affected Exposure Score Total Estimated Exposure Score for

Construction cost per
area divided by Total proportion of affected affected area multiply Affected Value
sq.m(optional)
Area multiply area by Unit Cost (optional) (optional)

100% 4 0 0
100% 4 0 0
 SENSITIVITY

Proportion of the
structure in
Average Exposure
Existing condition dilapidated/
Score
condemned
condition

if
≤5% of structure,
>5 to10% of structure,
Sum of exposure scores excellent, good, fair,
Sensitivity Score >10-20% of structure, Sensitivity Score
divided by 2 (optional) poor
≥20% of structure is in
dilapidated/
condemned condition

2 Good 2 0% 1
2 Good 2 0% 1
 SENSITIVITY

Proportion of Employing
structure Made of Year constructed Resilient Building
light materials Design

Before 1972,
if ≤5% of Structure
Between
>5 to10% of Structure
1972-1992, 1992-
>10-20% of Structure Sensitivity Score Sensitivity Score Yes or No
2012, 2012 and
≥20% of structureis
above(year ranges can
made of light materials
be adjusted)

0% 1 0 Yes
0% 1 0 Yes
 Percentage of
structures with no
access/area Capacity and
Average
coverage to willingness to
Sensitivity Score
infrastructure retrofit or relocate
related mitigation
measures

Est. percentage
Rounded up average covered by Adaptive Capacity see Scoring tab (A, B,
Sensitivity Score
sensitivity score infrastructure-related Score C, D)
measures

1 1 0% 1 D
1 1 0% 1 D
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Insurance Government
Coverage Investments

Est. percentage of Capacity of government

Adaptive Capacity Adaptive Capacity to make investments in Adaptive Capacity
property covered by
Score Score CCA-DRR (low, moderate, Score
insurance high, very high)

1 1 high 3
1 1 high 3
 Government
Regulations on
Available
hazard mitigation Average Adaptive
Alternative
zoning and Capacity Score
Sites/Structures
structural design
standards

Availability of
Rounded down
land/alternative sites Adaptive Capacity see Scoring tab (A, B, Adaptive Capacity
average adaptive
(low, moderate, high, Score C, D) Score
capacity score
very high)

low 1 B 3 1
low 1 B 3 1
 Severity of
Hazard Exposure Consequence Risk
VULNERABILITY
Score Score Score

Vulnerability Vulnerability
Index Score

Vulenrability Scores Severity of

Magnitude Score Sensitivity Score are based on the Exposure Score plus Consequence
multiply to Exposure divided by Adaptive calculated Vulnerability Score multiply
Score Capacity Score Vulenrability Index (see divided by 2 to likelihood
Scoring tab) of Occurrence

2 1 0.50 1.00 3.00

2 1 0.50 1.00 3.00
 Risk
Category

see Scoring Tab

low mod
low mod
CRITICAL FACILITIES EDT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE
HAZARD

Barangay Type of Facility Name of Facility/ Description

Sea Level Rise

Susceptibility

school, hospital, rural health

unit
evacuation center, water-
Low, Moderate, High
related facility, power-related
facility, airport, seaport,
government offices

Dolo Port Dolo Port High

Sabang Port Sabang Port High
 HAZARD EXPO

Estimated
Likelihood of Total Area
Magnitude Score No. of Storeys Affected Area
Occurrence Score (sq.m.)
(sq.m.)

Magnitude scores are

relative to the
Thru Anecdotal
magnitude of the Total land area of Estimated land area
Account No. of Floors
highest level of hazard facility/ compound affected by hazard
(Score range 1-6)
category (see Scoring
tab)

3 0.5 1 10975.93 10975.934

3 0.5 1 400.00 400
 EXPOSURE

Exposure Score Unit Cost/ Exposure Score

% of Affected Area Affected Value
for Affected Area Replacement Cost for Affected Value

Estimated affected Exposure Score Total Estimated Exposure Score for

Construction cost per
area divided by Total proportion of affected affected area multiply Affected Value
sq.m(optional)
Area multiply area by Unit Cost (optional) (optional)

100% 4 0 0
100% 4 0 0
 Barangay
Proportion of the
structure in
Average Exposure
Existing condition dilapidated/
Score
condemned
condition

if
≤5% of structure,
>5 to10% of structure,
Sum of exposure scores excellent, good, fair,
Sensitivity Score >10-20% of structure,
divided by 2 (optional) poor
≥20% of structure is in
dilapidated/
condemned condition

2 Dolo Good 2 0%
2 Sabang Good 2 0%
 SENSITIVITY

Proportion of
structure Made of Year constructed
light materials

Before 1972,
if ≤5% of Structure
Between
>5 to10% of Structure
1972-1992, 1992-
Sensitivity Score >10-20% of Structure Sensitivity Score Sensitivity Score
2012, 2012 and
≥20% of structureis
above(year ranges can
made of light materials
be adjusted)

1 0% 1 0
1 0% 1 0
 Barangay Percentage of
structures with no
Employing access/area
Average
Resilient Building coverage to
Sensitivity Score
Design infrastructure
related mitigation
measures

Est. percentage
Rounded up average covered by
Yes or No Sensitivity Score
sensitivity score infrastructure-related
measures

Yes 1 Dolo 1 0%
Yes 1 Sabang 1 0%
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Capacity and
Insurance
willingness to
Coverage
retrofit or relocate

Est. percentage of
Adaptive Capacity see Scoring tab (A, B, Adaptive Capacity Adaptive Capacity
property covered by
Score C, D) Score Score
insurance

1 D 1 1
1 D 1 1
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Government
Regulations on
Available
Government hazard mitigation
Alternative
Investments zoning and
Sites/Structures
structural design
standards

Capacity of government Availability of

to make investments in Adaptive Capacity land/alternative sites Adaptive Capacity see Scoring tab (A, B,
CCA-DRR (low, moderate, Score (low, moderate, high, Score C, D)
high, very high) very high)

high 3 low 1 B
high 3 low 1 B
 Hazard Exposure
VULNERABILITY
Score

Average Adaptive Vulnerability Vulnerability

Capacity Score Index Score

Vulenrability Scores
Rounded down Magnitude Score Sensitivity Score are based on the
Adaptive Capacity
average adaptive multiply to Exposure divided by Adaptive calculated
Score
capacity score Score Capacity Score Vulenrability Index (see
Scoring tab)

3 1 2 1 0.50
3 1 2 1 0.50
 Severity of
Consequence Risk Risk
Score Score Category

Severity of
Exposure Score plus Consequence
Vulnerability Score multiply see Scoring Tab
divided by 2 to likelihood
of Occurrence

1.00 3.00 low mod

1.00 3.00 low mod
LIFELINE UTILITIES EDT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE
IDENTIFICATION HAZARD

Barangay Likelihoo
Total
Storm Surge d of Magnitude
Classification Length
Susceptibility Occurren Score
(m)
ce Score

A B C D F G

Magnitude scores
Thru
are relative to the
Anecdotal Total length
National, Provincial, Municipal or Low, Moderate, magnitude of the
Account of road (GIS
Barangay High highest level of
(Score range derived)
hazard category
1-6)
(see Scoring tab)

Barangay Road High 3 1 6329.26

CALALAHAN
Power utilities line High 3 1
Barangay Road High 3 1 1157.23
Provincial Road High 0 0 1893.07
DOLO
Water distribution line High 3 1 1892.55
Power utilities line High 3 1
Provincial Road High 3 1 1111.5
MANZANA Water distribution line High 3 1 1104.14
Power utilities line High 3 1
MINORO Provincial Road High 3 1
Barangay Road High 3 1 2490.86
Provincial Road High 3 1 1490.47
SABANG
Water distribution line High 3 1 2362.92
Power utilities line High 3 1
TAGAS Barangay Road High 3 1 4566.76
RISE
EXPOSURE SENSITIV

Percentag Exposure Replacem Exposure

Affected Average
e of Score for ent/ Affected Score for
Length Exposure Surface Type Existing Condition
Affected Affected Construct Value Affected
(m) Score
Length Length ion Cost Value

H I J K L M N O P Q

Qualitative
assessment
of the
existing
Affected Exposure Affeted Exposure Construction
Sum of condition of
Affected Length Construction Length x Score for materials Sensitivity
Score for exposure the
length of Cost per construction proportion used (e.g. Score
road (GIS divided by proportion meter cost per of affected
scores
concrete, (subject to
distribution/
Total of affected divided by 2 access
derived) (optional) meter length asphalt, change)
Length length (optional) network
(optional) (optional) gravel, dirt)
(excellent,
good, fair,
poor/conde
mned)

54.4644 0.86% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete 1 good

0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A FALSE good
97.0874 8.39% 1 0 0 0.5 gravel 3 poor
117.561 6.21% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete 1 good
100.704 5.32% 1 0 0 0.5 N/A FALSE good
0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A FALSE good
31.0639 2.79% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete 1 good
31.1188 2.82% 1 0 0 0.5 N/A FALSE good
0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A FALSE good
169.808 0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A FALSE good
9.8473 0.40% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete 1 good
211.904 14.22% 2 0 0 1 concrete 1 good
145.954 6.18% 1 0 0 0.5 N/A FALSE good
0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A FALSE good
187.331 4.10% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete 1 good
 SENSITIVITY ADAPTIVE CA
Percentage of
structures with no
Average access/area Capacity and
Employing Resilient
Existing Condition Year Constructed Sensitivit coverage to willingness to
Design
y Score infrastructure retrofit
related mitigation
measures
R S T U V W X Y Z AA

Before
1980, 1980- Est.
1990, 1990- Rounded up percentage
Adaptive see Scoring Adaptive
Sensitivity 2000, 2000 Sensitivity Sensitivity average covered by
Yes or No Capacity tab (A, B, C, Capacity
Score and above Score Score sensitivity infrastructur
Score D) Score
(year ranges score e-related
can be measures
adjusted)

2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
4 0 no 4 3 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
2 0 yes 1 1 1 B 3
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY VULNERABILITY
Government Hazard
Regulations on Average Exposure
Government hazard mitigation Adaptive Score Vulnerabi Vulnerabi
Insurance Coverage
Investments zoning and Capacity lity Index lity Score
structural design Score
standards
AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK

Capacity of Vulenrabilit
government Rounded Sensitivity y Scores are
Est. to make Magnitude
down Score based on
percentage Adaptive investments Adaptive see Scoring Adaptive Score
average divided by the
of property Capacity in CCA-DRR Capacity tab (A, B, C, Capacity multiply to
(low, adaptive Adaptive calculated
covered by Score Score D) Score Exposure
moderate, capacity Capacity Vulenrabilit
insurance Score
high, very score Score y Index (see
high) Scoring tab)

1 high 3 A 4 2 1 0.50 0.25

1 high 3 A 4 2 0 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 1 1.50 0.75
1 high 3 A 4 2 0 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 1 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 0 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 1 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 1 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 0 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 0 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 1 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 2 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 1 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 0 0.50 0.25
1 high 3 A 4 2 1 0.50 0.25
 Severity
of
Risk Risk
Conseque
Score Category
nce Score

AL AM AN

Rounded up Severity of
the product Consequenc
of Hazard e
see Scoring
ExposureSco multiply
Tab
re and to likelihood
Vulnerabilit of
y Score Occurrence

1.00 3.00 low l

0.00 0.00 none
1.00 3.00 low L
0.00 0.00 none
1.00 3.00 low L
0.00 0.00 none
1.00 3.00 low L
1.00 3.00 low L
0.00 0.00 none
0.00 0.00 none
1.00 3.00 low L
1.00 3.00 low L
1.00 3.00 low L
0.00 0.00 none
1.00 3.00 low L
LIFELINE UTILITIES EDT FOR SEA LEVEL RISE
IDENTIFICATION HAZARD

Barangay Likelihoo
Total
Storm Surge d of Magnitude
Classification Length
Susceptibility Occurren Score
(m)
ce Score

A B C D F G

Magnitude scores
Thru
are relative to the
Anecdotal Total length
National, Provincial, Municipal or Low, Moderate, magnitude of the
Account of road (GIS
Barangay High highest level of
(Score range derived)
hazard category
1-6)
(see Scoring tab)

Barangay Road High 3 1 6329.26

CALALAHAN
Power utilities line High 3 1
Barangay Road High 3 1 1157.23
Provincial Road High 0 0 1893.07
DOLO
Water distribution line High 3 1 1892.55
Power utilities line High 3 1
Provincial Road High 3 1 1111.5
MANZANA Water distribution line High 3 1 1104.14
Power utilities line High 3 1
MINORO Provincial Road High 3 1
Barangay Road High 3 1 2490.86
Provincial Road High 3 1 1490.47
SABANG
Water distribution line High 3 1 2362.92
Power utilities line High 3 1
TAGAS Barangay Road High 3 1 4566.76
 EXPOSURE

Percentag Exposure Replacem Exposure Barangay

Affected Average
e of Score for ent/ Affected Score for
Length Exposure Surface Type
Affected Affected Construct Value Affected
(m) Score
Length Length ion Cost Value

H I J K L M N A O

Affected Exposure Affeted Exposure Construction

Sum of
Affected Length Construction Length x Score for materials
Score for exposure
length of Cost per construction proportion used (e.g.
road (GIS divided by proportion meter cost per of affected
scores
concrete,
Total of affected divided by 2
derived) (optional) meter length asphalt,
Length length (optional)
(optional) (optional) gravel, dirt)

54.4644 0.86% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete

CALALAHAN
0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A
97.0874 8.39% 1 0 0 0.5 gravel
117.561 6.21% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete
DOLO
100.704 5.32% 1 0 0 0.5 N/A
0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A
31.0639 2.79% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete
31.1188 2.82% 1 0 0 0.5 MANZANA N/A
0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A
169.808 0.00% 0 0 0 0 MINORO N/A
9.8473 0.40% 1 0 0 0.5 concrete
211.904 14.22% 2 0 0 1 concrete
SABANG
145.954 6.18% 1 0 0 0.5 N/A
0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A
187.331 4.10% 1 0 0 0.5 TAGAS concrete
 SENSITIVITY
Percentage of
structures with no
Average access/area
Employing Resilient
Surface Type Existing Condition Year Constructed Sensitivit coverage to
Design
y Score infrastructure
related mitigation
measures
P Q R S T U V W X Y

Qualitative
assessment
of the
Before
existing
1980, 1980- Est.
condition of
Sensitivity 1990, 1990- Rounded up percentage
the Adaptive
Score Sensitivity 2000, 2000 Sensitivity Sensitivity average covered by
distribution/ Yes or No Capacity
(subject to Score and above Score Score sensitivity infrastructur
access Score
change) (year ranges score e-related
network
can be measures
(excellent,
adjusted)
good, fair,
poor/conde
mned)

1 good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
3 poor 4 0 no 4 3 1
1 good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
1 good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
1 good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
1 good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
FALSE good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
1 good 2 0 yes 1 1 1
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Government
Regulations on Average
Capacity and
Government hazard mitigation Adaptive
willingness to Insurance Coverage
Investments zoning and Capacity
retrofit
structural design Score
standards
Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH

Capacity of
government Rounded
Est. to make down
see Scoring Adaptive percentage Adaptive investments Adaptive see Scoring Adaptive
average
tab (A, B, C, Capacity of property Capacity in CCA-DRR Capacity tab (A, B, C, Capacity
(low, adaptive
D) Score covered by Score Score D) Score
moderate, capacity
insurance
high, very score
high)

B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
B 3 1 high 3 A 4 2
 VULNERABILITY
Severity
Hazard of
Risk Risk
Barangay Exposure Conseque
Score Category
Score Vulnerabi Vulnerabi nce Score
lity Index lity Score

A AI AJ AK AL AM AN

Vulenrabilit
Rounded up Severity of
Sensitivity y Scores are
Magnitude the product Consequenc
Score based on
Score of Hazard e
divided by the see Scoring
multiply to ExposureSco multiply
Adaptive calculated Tab
Exposure re and to likelihood
Capacity Vulenrabilit
Score Vulnerabilit of
Score y Index (see
y Score Occurrence
Scoring tab)

1 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low l

CALALAHAN
0 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 none
1 1.50 0.75 1.00 3.00 low L
0 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 none
DOLO
1 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
0 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 none
1 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
MANZANA 1 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
0 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 none
MINORO 0 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 none
1 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
2 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
SABANG
1 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L
0 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 none
TAGAS 1 0.50 0.25 1.00 3.00 low L