MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JUAN DELA CRUZ Name of Rater: SONNY V. MATIAS

Rating Period: AUG.-JAN. 2024 Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Date of Review: January 25, 2024

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Review
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

1. Content, 1. Applied YEAR 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality

Knowledge, knowledge of ROUND sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
and form done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
content within Efficiency
person classroom observation.
Pedagogy and across
curriculum If onsite/face-to-face/in person classroom Timeliness
teaching areas observation are not implemented,

❖ Through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching and other modalities; or
❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via LAC
session

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
7%
Basic 2. Used a YEAR Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Edu range of ROUND sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
cati teaching form done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
on strategies that person classroom observation.
Ser enhance If onsite/face-to-face/in person
vice learner classroom observation is not
s achievement in implemented,
literacy and ❖ Through observation of
numeracy synchronous/asynchronous
skills. (PPST teaching and other modalities; or
1.4.2) ❖ Through observation of a
Efficiency
 demonstration teaching *via LAC Timeliness
session

Basic 3. Applied a range YEAR Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Edu of teaching ROUND sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
cati strategies to 7% form done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
Efficiency
on develop critical person classroom observation.
Ser and creative If onsite/face-to-face/in person
vice thinking, as classroom observation is not Timelines
s well as other implemented,
higher order ❖ Through observation of
thinking synchronous/asynchronous
skills. (PPST teaching and other modalities; or
1.5.2) ❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via LAC
session

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed YEAR 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Edu Environment classroom ROUND sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
cati and Diversity structure to form done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
on of Learners engage learners, person classroom observation.
Ser individually or in Efficiency
vice groups, in If onsite/face-to-face/in person
s meaningful classroom observation is not
exploration, implemented,
discovery and
hands-on ❖ Through observation of Timeliness
activities within a synchronous/asynchronous
range of physical teaching and other modalities; or
learning
environments. ❖ Through observation of a
(PPST 2.3.2) demonstration teaching *via LAC
session

Basic 5. Managed YEAR Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality

Edu learner behavior ROUND sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
cati constructively by form done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
on applying positive 7% person classroom observation.
Ser and non-violent.
vice discipline to If onsite/face-to-face/in person
s ensure learning classroom observation is not
focused! implemented,
environments Efficiency
 (PSST 2.6.2) ❖ Through observation of Timeliness
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching and other modalities; or

❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via LAC
session

Basic 6. Used YEAR Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality

Edu differentiated, ROUND sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
cati developmentally form done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
on appropriate person classroom observation.
Ser learning
vice experiences to If onsite/face-to-face/in person
s address learners’ classroom observation is not.
gender, needs, implemented,
strengths, ❖ Through observation of
interests and synchronous/asynchronous
experiences. teaching and other modalities; or
(PPST 3.1.2) ❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via LAC
session

7%

Efficiency

Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, YEAR 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Edu and Planning managed and ROUND sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
cati implemented form done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
on developmentally person classroom observation.
Ser sequenced If onsite/face-to-face/in person
vice teaching and classroom observation is not
s learning implemented,
processes to ❖ Through observation of
meet curriculum synchronous/asynchronous Efficiency
requirements and teaching and other modalities; or
varied teaching ❖ Through observation of a
contexts. (PPST demonstration teaching *via LAC
4.1.2) session Timeliness

8.Participated in YEAR 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC Quality

collegial ROUND Sessions/FGDs/meeting
discussions that 7% s/other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner feedback
to enrich
teaching 2. Minutes of LAC
practice. (PPST Sessions/FGDs/meeting
4.4.2) s/ and other collegial
discussions on the use
of teacher and learner Efficiency
feedback to enrich teaching
practice.
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of
teaching practices
following participations
from LAC
sessions/FGDs/meeting
s/other collegial
discussions that use Timeliness
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective
Basic 9. Selected, YEAR 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality
Edu developed, ROUND rating sheet and/or
cati organized and inter-observer agreement
on used appropriate form done through
Ser teaching and onsite/face-to-face/in-person
vice learning classroom observation If onsite/face-
s resources, to-face/in
including ICT, to person classroom
address learning observation is not
goals. implemented,
(PPST 4.5.2) • Through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of a
demonstration Efficiency
teaching *via LAC
session

Timeliness

Basic 4. 10. Designed, YEAR 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality

Edu Assessment selected, ROUND rating sheet and/or
cati and organized and inter-observer agreement
on Reporting used form done through
Ser diagnostic, onsite/face-to-face/in-person
vice formative and classroom observation
s summative Efficiency
assessment If onsite/face-to-face/in
strategies person classroom
consistent with observation is not
curriculum implemented,
requirements. • Through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2) synchronous/asynchronous
teaching and other Timeliness
modalities; or
• Through observation of a
demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
Basic 11. Monitored and YEAR 7% Any one of the following: • Individual Quality
Edu evaluated learner ROUND Learning
cati progress and Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
on achievement • Peer Assessment Data
Ser using learner • Sample of Learner’s output with
vice attainment reflection/self
s data. (PPST assessment
5.2.2) • Progress Charts/Anecdotal Records
• Class/e-class records/ Efficiency
grading sheets
• Lesson Plan showing index of mastery
• Frequency of errors with identified
least mastered skills
• Any equivalent ALS
form/document that Timeliness
highlights the objective (e.g. Individual
Learning
Achievement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
• Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 12.Communicated YEAR Anyone (1) of the Quality

Edu promptly and ROUND following:
cati clearly the • A sample of corrected test paper of
on learners’ 7% Efficiency
learner in a
Ser needs,
learning area with
vice progress and
s achievement to parents’ or guardian’s
key stakeholders, signature and date of
 including receipt Timeliness
parents/ • Minutes of meeting with key
guardians (PPST stakeholders (e.g.
5.4.2)
PTC, SGC, SPT, CPC)
with proof of attendance
• Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
the meeting
• Communication with
stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co
teacher, LGU) using
various modalities
• Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
• Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective.
• Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

13. Applied a YEAR 7% A reflection/journal Quality

personal ROUND entry that highlights.
philosophy of the application of a
teaching that is learner-centered teaching
learner centered. philosophy in Efficiency
(PPST 7.1.2) the lesson plan or
community work.

Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

14. Set YEAR 7% 1. Certification form the ICT Quality

 professional ROUND Coordinator/School Head/ Focal Person Efficiency
development in-charge of e-SAT
goals based 2. IPCRF-DP
on the 3. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
Timeliness
Philippine. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
Professional
Standards for
Teachers (PPST
7.5.2)

Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed YEAR 2% Anyone (1) proof of: Quality
Edu various related ROUND • Committee involvement • Involvement as
cati works/activities module/learning
on that contribute to material writer/validator Efficiency
Ser the teaching • Involvement as a
vice learning process. resource
s person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/School
initiated TV/Radio
based instruction. Timeliness
• Book or journal
authorship/co
authorship/contributor
ship
• Advisership/coordinator
ship/chairpersonship
• Participation in
demonstration teaching
• Participation as
research presenter in a
forum or conference
• Mentoring or pre
service/in-service
teachers
• Conducted research within the rating
period
• Others please specify

with annotation on how it

contributed to the teaching learning
process.
 SONNY V. MATIAS M-T II
________________________________ _______________________ _______________________________
Ratee Rater Approving Authority