Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Employment Practices
Employment Practices
Employment Practices
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date
2
Employment Practices
Employment discrimination is an alarming issue that can appear in many forms. Some
discriminatory practices include age discrimination, which may happen when employers prefer
youth over the old during hiring, thinking of younger people as tech-savvy or vibrant. Gender
discrimination is based on gender stereotypes or biases, a company may pay lower salaries to
female employees than their male counterparts, and it can provide fewer promotion opportunities
for women. Racial discrimination tends to cause imbalance among employees and can be
reinforced by biased employers who choose individuals of a particular race during recruitment or
may lead to deny of accommodation to a disabled employee, thereby denying her opportunities
Equal employment legislation needs to be more consistent nationwide. For instance, the
United States has three levels of employment regulation federal, state, and local. Federal
protections against discrimination include the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the ADA (Murphy
2020). Alternatively, the states and localities can impose extra measures to protect their
employees even more. Federal equal employment policies usually serve as the foundation for
anti-discrimination laws nationwide. Other states will then be able to adopt laws at their
discretion, adding an extra layer of protection compared to the federal standards. Local
In conclusion, although a basic framework is set at the federal level, equal employment
policies can differ from state to state and even within local environments to tailor them toward
3
solving unique problems while ensuring employees are protected against discrimination. The
mixture of federal, state, and municipal laws is meant to develop a total system that moves the
Reference
Murphy, K. L. (2020). Civil Rights Laws: Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973: IA v. Seguin Indep. Sch. Dist. 881 F. Supp. 2d