Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.15560/16.5.1181
1 Colecciones Biológicas, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Carrera 8, No 15-08, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá,
Colombia. 2 Grupo de Investigación en Zoología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Tolima, Barrio Santa Helena
Parte Alta, Ibagué, Tolima, Colombia. 3 Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes, Departamento de Morfologia, Instituto de Biociências,
Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, R. Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin 250, 18618-689, Botucatu, SP, Brazil. 4
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad de Ibagué, Carrera 22, Calle 67, 730001, Ibagué, Tolima, Colombia.
Corresponding author: Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, jalbornoz@humboldt.org.co
Abstract
An annotated list of the freshwater fishes of the Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Magdalena Basin is presented.
Fishes were captured from nine localities, quarterly sampled between September 2012 and July 2013. A total of 36 spe-
cies belonging to 14 families, distributed in five orders were collected. The most abundant species was Trichomycterus
banneaui (Eigenmann, 1912) (19.4%), followed by Creagrutus affinis Steindachner, 1880 (13%), Chaetostoma thom-
soni Regan, 1904 (9.1%), Trichomycterus mogotensis Ardila-Rodríguez, 2017 (7.7%), Astroblepus homodon (Regan,
1904) (6.6%), Creagrutus dulima Albornoz-Garzón, Conde-Saldaña, García-Melo, Taphorn & Villa-Navarro, 2018
(5.9%), Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes, 1846 (5.7%) and Argopleura magdalenensis (Eigenmann, 1913) (5.6%). An
identification key and a complete photographic catalog of all fish species recorded in the drainage are presented.
Keywords
Andes, Characiformes, fish diversity, identification key, Neotropical region, Siluriformes.
Academic editor: Gabriela Echevarría | Received 4 April 2020 | Accepted 3 September 2020 | Published 18 September 2020
Citation: Albornoz-Garzón JG, Conde-Saldaña CC, López-Delgado EO, García-Melo JE, Villa-Navarro FA (2020) Fishes from the Río Alvarado
drainage, Upper Río Magdalena Basin, Colombia. Check List 16 (5): 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.15560/16.5.1181
Introduction
Currently the Magdalena-Cauca system harbors 217 valid Upper Magdalena is characterized by the lack of flood-
species (DoNascimiento et al. 2019), many of which are plains and has an area of 55,785 km2, from its source in
endemic or are important for fisheries (Galvis and Mojica the La Magdalena lagoon at the Páramo de Las Papas
2007; Anderson and Maldonado-Ocampo 2011). Histori- (Huila department) to Los Raudales de Honda, in Tolima
cally, this basin has been subdivided in three stretches: department, including some drainages with headwaters
Upper, Middle and Lower Magdalena Basin (Eigenmann in Cauca and Cundinamarca departments. The Upper
1920; Mojica and Franco 1990). Each region has its own Magdalena Valley is dominated by Tropical Dry Forest
hidromorphological and biological conditions (Mojica ecosystem, with warm temperature (27 °C average) and a
and Franco 1990; Forero-Medina and Joppa 2010). The marked dry season (Villa-Navarro et al. 2006; Galvis and
© The authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
1182 Check List 16 (5)
Mojica 2007; Forero-Medina and Joppa 2010; Romero- an identification key, and a complete photographic album
Duque et al. 2019). Likewise, this is a region with a high of the fish species are provided.
anthropogenic pressure due to landscape transformation,
mainly cattle and agriculture activities (Forero-Medina
and Joppa 2010).
Methods
The Upper Río Magdalena Basin is a region with a Study area. This study was carried out in the Río Alvarado
relatively well documented ichthyological knowledge in drainage (Upper Río Magdalena Basin), which is located
Colombia, which is reflected in the high variety of works on the eastern flank of the Cordillera Central, in Tolima
published recently, life history studies (Villa-Navarro et Department, Colombia. The drainage has a length of 55
al. 2014; Zúñiga-Upegui et al. 2014), patterns of com- km, a drainage area of 29,988 ha (Conde-Saldaña et al.
munity structure (Miranda et al. 2018; Montoya-Ospina 2017), and flows into the Río Totare drainage. Nine sam-
et al. 2018; Poveda-Cuellar et al. 2018), ecomorphology pling stations were established from 351 to 1,057 m eleva-
(Conde-Saldaña et al. 2017), exotic species (Albornoz- tion, distributed along the main channel (four stations) and
Garzón and Villa-Navarro 2017), new species descrip- in main tributaries (five stations) (Fig. 1, Table 1).
tions (Ortega-Lara et al. 2011; García-Alzate et al. 2015;
García-Melo et al. 2016; Provenzano and Villa-Navarro Sampling. Sampling campaigns were carried out quar-
2017; Villa-Navarro et al. 2017; Albornoz-Garzón et al. terly, in an annual hydrological cycle, between Septem-
2018; García-Melo et al. 2018), karyotype descriptions ber 2012 and July 2013. Fishes were collected using a
(Conde-Saldaña et al. 2018, 2019a; Ibagón et al. 2020), backpack electrofisher (SAMUS model 725M). Electro-
and list of species (Villa-Navarro et al. 2006). However, fishing was performed in a single pass from downstream
our understanding of basic aspects of the fishes from to upstream, with a variable width (depending on chan-
small drainages in the Upper Magdalena is still limited. nel width), in a section of 100 m and a sampling effort
Taking this into consideration, we present an annotated of one hour. The specimens collected were anesthetized
list of fish species from the Río Alvarado drainage as a and euthanized with clove oil (300 mg/l), subsequently
framework for future studies and as a guide for scientific fixed in 10% formalin, and transferred to 70% ethanol
and educational purposes, for the identification of fish after 48 h for final preservation.
species from Upper Río Magdalena Basin. A checklist, The collected specimens were identified in the
Figure 1. Map showing the study area and sampling localities in the Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Magdalena Basin, Colombia: 01:
Quebrada Cocare; 02: Quebrada Chembe; 03: Quebrada Chumba; 04: Río Alvarado-El País; 05: Quebrada La Manjarres; 06: Río Alvarado-
Chucuní; 07: Río Alvarado-El Puente; 08: Quebrada La Caima; and 09: Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo (see Table 1 for detailed locality data).
Albornoz-Garzón et al. | Fishes from Río Alvarado, Colombia 1183
Table. 1. Sampled localities in the Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Order Characiformes
Magdalena Basin, Colombia. ID = locality identification, see also Family Crenuchidae
Figure 1 and Table 2.
Table 2. List of species from Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Magdalena Basin, Colombia. Fig. = reference to figure. CZUT-IC = catalog
number of voucher specimens. * = threatened species; ** = non-native species.
Locality
Species Fig. CZUT-IC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Characiformes
Crenuchidae 2A
Characidium phoxocephalum Eigenmann, 1912* X 10638
Erythrinidae
Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch, 1794) X X X X X 2B 10346
Parodontidae
Parodon magdalenensis Londoño-Burbano, Román-Valencia & Taphorn, 2011 X 2C 10368
Characidae
Astyanax sp. X X 2D 10555
Argopleura magdalenensis (Eigenmann, 1913) X X X X 2E 10150
Creagrutus affinis Steindachner, 1880 X X X X 2F 10078
Creagrutus dulima Albornoz-Garzón, Conde-Saldaña, García-Melo, Taphorn & Villa-Navarro, 2018 X X X X X X 2G 10225
Creagrutus magdalenae Eigenmann, 1913 X X 2H 10060
Gephyrocharax melanocheir Eigenmann, 1912 X X X X 2I 10706
Hemibrycon sp. X 2J 10790
Microgenys minuta Eigenmann, 1913* X X X 2K 10335
Roeboides dayi (Steindachner, 1878) X 2L 10536
Siluriformes
Heptapteridae
Cetopsorhamdia molinae Miles, 1943 X 3A 10087
Pimelodella floridablancaensis Ardila-Rodríguez, 2017 X X X X X 3B 10197
Rhamdia guatemalensis (Günther, 1864) X X X X 3C 10351
Heptapteridae undescribed X X X X 3D 10417
Pimelodidae
Pimelodus yuma Villa-Navarro & Acero, 2017 X 3E 10352
Trichomycteridae
Trichomycterus banneaui (Eigenmann, 1912) X X X X X X X X X 3F 10106
Trichomycterus transandianus (Steindachner, 1915) X X X 3G 10850
Trichomycterus mogotensis Ardila-Rodríguez, 2017 X X X X X X X 3H 10254
Loricariidae
Chaetostoma milesi Fowler, 1941 X X X X 3I 10593
Chaetostoma thomsoni Regan, 1904 X X X X X X 3J 10121
Hypostomus (Cochliodon) hondae (Regan, 1912)* X X X X 3K 10766
Lasiancistrus caucanus Eigenmann, 1912 X X X X 3L 10123
Sturisomatichthys leightoni (Regan, 1912) X X X X X 4A 10063
Astroblepidae
Astroblepus grixalvii Humboldt, 1805 X X 4B 10500
Astroblepus homodon (Regan, 1904) X X X X X X 4C 10666
Astroblepus sp. X 4D 10502
Gymnotiformes
Sternopygidae
Sternopygus aequilabiatus Humboldt, 1805 X X 4E 10367
Apteronotidae
Apteronotus eschmeyeri de Santana, Maldonado-Ocampo, Severi & Mendes, 2004 X 4F 10692
Cyprinodontiformes
Rivulidae
Rivulus (Cynodonichthys) magdalenae Eigenmann & Henn, 1916 X X X X 4G 10208
Poeciliidae
Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859** X X X X X 4H 10434
Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes, 1846** X X X 4I 10126
Cichliformes
Cichlidae
Andinoacara latifrons (Steindachner, 1878) X X X 4J 10582
Geophagus steindachneri Eigenmann & Hildebrand, 1910 X X X X X X 4K 10111
Kronoheros umbrifer (Meek & Hildebrand, 1913)* X X 4L 10716
Albornoz-Garzón et al. | Fishes from Río Alvarado, Colombia 1185
Figure 2. Characiform fishes from Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Magdalena Basin, Colombia. A. Characidium phoxocephalum. B.
Hoplias malabaricus. C. Parodon magdalenensis. D. Astyanax sp. E. Argopleura magdalenensis. F. Creagrutus affinis. G. Creagrutus dulima.
H. Creagrutus magdalenae. I. Gephyrocharax melanocheir. J. Hemibrycon sp. K. Microgenys minuta. L. Roeboides dayi. Scale bars: 10 mm.
humeral region. Dark humeral blotch, vertically elon- the branched rays). Eye diameter: 21.8–26.8% HL. Body
gated. Dorsal-fin rays yellow. Pectoral and pelvic-fin with dorsal portion with dark reticulated pattern formed
rays hyaline. Anteriormost anal-fin rays reddish, with by pigmentation concentrated on distal portion of scales.
distal tips white. Caudal-fin rays reddish with yellow to Dark humeral blotch vertically elongated. Middle cau-
light green tone. Adipose fin greenish. dal-fin rays without a dark horizontal stripe (Albornoz-
Garzón et al. 2018).
Argopleura magdalenensis (Eigenmann, 1913)
Figure 2E Creagrutus magdalenae Eigenmann, 1913
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 65, 23.4–38.8 mm Figure 2H
SL; Quebrada La Caima; 04°35′45.8″N, 074°56′39.6″W; Material examined. COLOMBIA • 16, 53.1–79.4 mm
374 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°55′
Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10150. • 44, 46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Juan G. Albor-
17.6–44.2 mm SL; Quebrada La Caima; 04°35′45.8″N, noz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-
074°56′39.6″W; 374 m a.s.l.; 4 Apr. 2013; Juan G. Albor- IC 10060. • 6, 55.8–66.6 mm SL; Quebrada La Caima;
noz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 04°35′45.8″N, 074°56′39.6″W; 374 m a.s.l.; 19 Dec. 2012;
10556. Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña
Identification. Maxillary not reaching suture between leg.; CZUT-IC 10372.
first and second infraorbital. Lateral line with 40–43 Identification. Third infraorbital in contact with the
pored scales. Five scales between the dorsal-fin origin preopercle. Lateral line complete, with 34–37 pored
and the lateral line. Anal fin with 33–37 branched rays. A scales. No lamellar flaps over pores of lateral line scales.
bright mid-lateral stripe extending from humeral region Anal fin short with 9–11 branched rays. Caudal-peduncle
to caudal peduncle (Eigenmann 1913). depth (12.6–15.9% SL). Dark humeral blotch ovoid. Mid-
dle caudal-fin rays without a dark horizontal stripe (Har-
Creagrutus affinis Steindachner, 1880 old and Vari 1994; Albornoz-Garzón et al. 2018).
Figure 2F
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 12, 28.9–43.8 mm Gephyrocharax melanocheir Eigenmann, 1912
SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074° Figure 2I
55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. Material examined. COLOMBIA. • 7, 31.3–35.3
Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT- mm SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N,
IC 10078. • 17, 25.9–44.7 mm SL; Quebrada La Caima; 074°55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2013; Cristhian C.
04°35′45.8″N, 074°56′39.6″W; 374 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-
Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón IC 10706. • 7, 36.6–37.5 mm SL; Quebrada La Manjarres;
leg.; CZUT-IC 10139. 04°28′19.3″N, 075°04′26.9″W; 758 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2013;
Identification. Third infraorbital in contact with the pre- Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña
opercle. Lateral line complete, with 35–38 pored scales. leg.; CZUT-IC 10788.
No lamellar flaps over pores of lateral line scales. Anal Identification. Outermost branched pectoral-fin ray of
fin short with 11–13 branched rays. Dark humeral blotch adult males with a fan-shaped structure distally formed.
vertically elongated. Middle caudal-fin rays with a dark Bony hooks and a dark blotch present distally in the fan-
horizontal stripe (Harold and Vari 1994; Albornoz-Gar- shaped structure. Caudal-fin rays 10th and 11th lacking
zón et al. 2018). of terminal lateral-line tube. Adult males with a long gill
gland (7.0–11.4% SL). Urogenital papillae developed in
Creagrutus dulima Albornoz-Garzón, Conde-Saldaña, adult females. An intense dark pigmentation at the base
García-Melo, Taphorn & Villa-Navarro, 2018 of the five anterior dorsal-fin rays (Vanegas-Ríos 2016).
Figure 2G
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 10, 30.7–65.8 mm Hemibrycon sp.
SL; Río Alvarado-Chucuní; 04°27′56.7″N, 075°03′46.7″ Figure 2J
W; 697 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Juan G. Albornoz-Gar- Material examined. COLOMBIA • 1, 53.7 mm SL; Río
zón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 10225. Alvarado-Puente; 04°31′11.3″N, 074°59′14.0″W; 521 m
• 20, 29.3–56.3 mm SL; Río Alvarado-El País; 04° a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2013; Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, Juan G.
27′37.9″N, 075°07′45.2″W; 909 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10790.
Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña Identification. The identification was based on a sin-
leg.; CZUT-IC 10368. gle specimen in poorly preserved condition. Body deep
Identification. Third infraorbital not in contact with (28.9% SL). Distance between dorsal and anal fin ori-
the preopercle. Lateral line complete, with 35–38 pored gins (29.1% SL). Head length (23.6% SL). Snout length
scales. No lamellar flaps over pores of lateral line scales. (17.8% HL). Premaxilla with two rows of teeth. Anal fin
Anal fin short with 9–12 branched rays. Pelvic fins with with 26 branched rays. Dark humeral blotch vertically
short hooks on rays (usually shorter than the width of elongated. A silvery mid-lateral stripe extending from
Albornoz-Garzón et al. | Fishes from Río Alvarado, Colombia 1187
humeral region to caudal peduncle. Middle caudal-fin adipose fin, and one around the caudal peduncle (Miles
rays with a dark horizontal stripe. 1943).
Figure 3. Siluriform fishes from Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Magdalena Basin, Colombia. A. Cetopsorhamdia molinae. B. Pimelodella
floridablancaensis. C. Rhamdia guatemalensis. D. Heptapteridae undescribed. E. Pimelodus yuma. F. Trichomycterus banneaui. G. Trichomyc-
terus transandianus. H. Trichomycterus mogotensis I. Chaetostoma milesi. J. Chaetostoma thomsoni. K. Hypostomus (Cochliodon) hondae. L.
Lasiancistrus caucanus. Scale bars: 10 mm.
075°03′46.7″W; 697 m a.s.l.; 13 Dec. 2012; Cristhian C. its origin anterior to anal-fin; adipose-fin origin equi-
Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT- distant between dorsal and caudal fins). Adipose-fin
IC 10452. depth (2.2–4.6% SL). Caudal fin forked with both lobes
Identification. Body moderately elongated. Body deep rounded, upper lobe longer than lower lobe. Body brown
(9.2–16.6% SL). Cleithral width: 14.0–18.8% SL. Head with scattered minute melanophores along body. A con-
length: 18.4–22.1% SL. Maxillary barbel reaching pec- spicuous pale collar around posterior region of head and
toral-fin insertion. Adipose fin rounded (17.6–30.2% SL, pale blotch in front of dorsal fin. Fins hyaline.
Albornoz-Garzón et al. | Fishes from Río Alvarado, Colombia 1189
emarginated with lower portion longer than upper por- Family Astroblepidae
tion. Light spots usually concentrated on head. Fins with
white to yellow bands. Distal margin along caudal fin Astroblepus grixalvii Humboldt, 1805
pale, more evident at tips (Regan 1904). Figure 4B
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 11, 25.0–102.7 mm
Hypostomus (Cochliodon) hondae (Regan, 1912) SL; Quebrada Cocare; 04°28′37.4″N, 075°08′25.4″W;
Figure 3K 1057 m a.s.l.; 13 Dec. 2012; Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón,
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 1, 53.9 mm SL; Río Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 10500. • 6,
Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°55′46.2″W; 51.7–139.8 mm SL; Quebrada Cocare; 04°28′37.4″N,
351 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2013; Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, 075°08′25.4″W; 1057 m a.s.l.; 5 Apr. 2013; Juan G.
Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10697. • 2, Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.;
24.2–49.7 mm SL; Río Alvarado-Puente; 04°31′11.3″N, CZUT-IC 10665.
074°59′14.0″W; 521 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2013; Cristhian C. Identification. Relatively large size (largest specimen
Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT- 140 mm SL). Premaxillary teeth unicuspid. Adipose fin
IC 10766. long and deep with a short spine embedded into the pos-
terior region of fin, posterior fin margin continuous with
Identification. Mouth with spoon-shaped teeth. Plates in
first caudal-fin ray. First pectoral and dorsal-fin rays ex-
the skin between the dorsal fin and the lateral plates an-
tended as filaments. Caudal fin truncated. Upper and
terior of the dorsal-fin spine 1 to more of 6. Pectoral-fin lower unbranched caudal-fin rays extended as filaments.
spine reach 2–3 plates beyond the pelvic fin when de- Body brownish with greenish tone, dark scattered spots
pressed ventrally to the pelvic fin. Caudal-fin spines with and blotches on head and body (Briñez-Vásquez 2011).
spots (Armbruster 2003).
Astroblepus homodon (Regan, 1904)
Lasiancistrus caucanus Eigenmann, 1912 Figure 4C
Figure 3L Material examined. COLOMBIA • 32, 20.1–54.4 mm SL;
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 5, 29–74.2 Quebrada Chumba; 04°29′06.2″N, 075°05′48.6″W; 973 m
mm SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, a.s.l.; 20 Sep. 2012; Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian
074°55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 10275. • 43, 19.2–59.3
Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT- mm SL; Quebrada Cocare; 04°28′37.4″N, 075°08′25.4″W;
IC 10065. • 3, 30.2–33.1 mm SL; Quebrada La Caima; 1057 m a.s.l.; 5 Apr. 2013; Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cris-
04°35′45.8″N, 074°56′39.6″W; 374 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; thian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 10666.
Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón Identification. Relatively medium size (largest speci-
leg.; CZUT-IC 10123. men 71.4 mm SL). Premaxillary teeth bicuspid. Head
Identification. Whisker-like odontodes on the cheek and and predorsal region covered with small papillae. Adi-
at the corner of the snout. Absence of plates ventrally pose fin short and thick, with a visible spine covered with
in front of the anus. Caudal fin slightly emarginated to odontodes, posteriorly connected to caudal peduncle by
forked. Dark spots in the dorsal fin (Armbruster 2005). a membrane. First dorsal-fin ray not extended as a fila-
ment. Ventral-fin origin well in advance of the dorsal-fin
Sturisomatichthys leightoni (Regan, 1912) origin. Caudal fin with distal margin concave, upper and
Figure 4A lower unbranched caudal-fin rays extended as filaments.
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 13, 32.8–69 mm Body light brown with black scattered spots and blotches
on head and body, sometimes with a small yellow blotch
SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°55′
on the adipose-spine base (Regan 1904).
46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. Conde-
Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC Astroblepus sp.
10063. • 19, 24.3–92.3 mm SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Figure 4D
Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. Material examined. COLOMBIA • 5, 21.6–65.7 mm
2012; Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz- SL; Quebrada Cocare; 04°28′37.4″N, 075°08′25.4″W;
Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10082. 1057 m a.s.l.; 12 Dec. 2012; Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón,
Identification. Reticulations on predorsal, supraoccipi- Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 10502. • 6,
tal, and interorbital regions. Rostrum present. Cleithral 33.0–64.8 mm SL; Quebrada Cocare; 04°28′37.4″N,
width: 11.0–14.1% SL. Coalescent plates 13–16. Dorsal, 075°08′25.4″W; 1057 m a.s.l.; 5 Apr. 2013; Juan G. Albor-
pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins lacking filaments. A thin noz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC
dorsolateral stripe discontinuous and ill-marked present. 10667.
Dorsal, pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins lacking large, dark Identification. Relatively medium size (largest specimen
blotches occupying almost the entire fin (Londoño-Bur- 67 mm SL). Premaxillary teeth incisiform. Head and pre-
bano and Reis 2019). dorsal region covered with small papillae. Adipose fin
Albornoz-Garzón et al. | Fishes from Río Alvarado, Colombia 1191
Figure 4. Fishes from Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Magdalena Basin, Colombia. A–D. Siluriformes. A. Sturisomatichthys leightoni. B.
Astroblepus grixalvii. C. Astroblepus homodon. D. Astroblepus sp. E–F. Gymnotiformes: E. Sternopygus aequilabiatus. F. Apteronotus eschmey-
eri. G–I. Cyprinodontiformes. G. Rivulus (Cynodonichthys) magdalenae (male). H. Poecilia reticulata (male). I. Poecilia sphenops (male) J–L.
Cichliformes. J. Andinoacara latifrons. K. Geophagus steindachneri. L. Kronoheros umbrifer. Scale bars: 10 mm.
short and thick, with a visible spine covered with odon- posterior region of dorsal-fin base. Fins with dark spots.
todes, posteriorly connected to caudal peduncle by a
Order Gymnotiformes
membrane. First dorsal-fin ray not extended as a filament.
Family Sternopygidae
Caudal fin with distal margin deeply concave, upper and
lower unbranched caudal-fin rays extended as filaments. Sternopygus aequilabiatus Humboldt, 1805
Body dark, with a light blotch at middle of caudal pe- Figure 4E
duncle, variable in size, sometimes with a light blotch at Material examined. COLOMBIA • 1, 181 mm TL; Río
1192 Check List 16 (5)
Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°55′46.2″W; fins hyaline. A dark spot on upper portion of caudal pe-
351 m a.s.l.; 12 Dec. 2012; Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, duncle (Henn 1916).
Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10353. • 3, 249–
314 mm TL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, Family Poeciliidae
074°55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 12 Dec. 2012; Cristhian C.
Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859
Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-
Figure 4H
IC 10367.
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 10, 11.7–24.3 mm
Identification. Dorsal margin of snout profile strongly
SL; Quebrada La Manjarres; 04°28′19.3″N, 075°04′26.9″
concave. Pectoral fin length: 44–53% HL. Head length:
W; 758 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Juan G. Albornoz-Gar-
13–16% LEA. Branchial opening: 20–28% HL. Dark hu-
zón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 10209.
meral spot absent or very diffuse (Hulen et al. 2005).
• 8, 15.9–23.7 mm SL; Quebrada La Manjarres; 04°
Family Apteronotidae 28′19.3″N, 075°04′26.9″W; 758 m a.s.l.; 12 Dec. 2012;
Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña
Apteronotus eschmeyeri de Santana, Maldonado- leg.; CZUT-IC 10434.
Ocampo, Severi & Mendes, 2004 Identification. Dorsal-fin rays 6–7. Gonopodium with
Figure 4F a retrorse hook on ray 5. The fleshy palp elongated, ex-
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 1, 131.8 mm SL; Río tending well beyond the tip. Ventral spines on the third
Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°55′46.2″W; gonopodial ray large, giving the gonopodium a bulb-like
351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, appearance. Body silvery, with dots, stripes and blotches
Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10090. • 1, 86.2 (only in males) (Poeser 2003).
mm SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°
55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2013; Cristhian C. Poecilia sphenops Valenciennes, 1846
Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT- Figure 4I
IC 10692. Material examined. COLOMBIA • 11, 10.7–33.9 mm
Identification. Mouth rictus extends to beyond the pos- SL; Quebrada La Caima; 04°35′45.8″N, 075°56′39.6″W;
terior margin of eyes. Body blotchy. A clear band from 374 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña,
chin to the beginning of dorsal mid-sagittal electrorecep- Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10126. • 7,
tor organ. Two clear bands surrounding the caudal pe- 11.8–28.4 mm SL; Río Alvarado-Chucuní; 04°27′56.7″N,
duncle in specimens (up to 165 mm TL); bands become 075°03′46.7″W; 697 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Juan G. Albor-
obscured by pigment blotching in specimens larger than noz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC
165 mm (de Santana et al. 2004). 10243.
Identification. Dorsal-fin rays 9–10. Blueish and reddish
Order Cyprinodontiformes spots (males), extending from humeral region to caudal
Family Rivulidae peduncle in the body sides. Dorsal fin with a yellow spot
surrounded by two or three black bands (Poeser 2003).
Rivulus (Cynodonichthys) magdalenae Eigenmann &
Henn, 1916 Order Cichliformes
Figure 4G Family Cichlidae
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 11, 16.9–45.7
mm SL; Quebrada La Manjarres; 04°28′19.3″N, Andinoacara latifrons (Steindachner, 1878)
075°04′26.9″W; 758 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Juan G. Albor- Figure 4J
noz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC Material examined. COLOMBIA 2, 53.4–58.2 mm
10208. • 13, 19.9–44.6 mm SL; Quebrada La Manjarres; SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°55′
04°28′19.3″N, 075°04′26.9″W; 758 m a.s.l.; 12 Dec. 2012; 46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. Conde-
Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC 10110.
leg.; CZUT-IC 10439. • 3, 41.6–45.4 mm SL; Quebrada La Caima; 04°35′
Identification. Head scaled, except for cheek. Mouth su- 45.8″N, 075°56′39.6″W; 374 m a.s.l.; 4 Apr. 2013; Juan
perior. Longitudinal series of scales 40–42. Body col- G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.;
oration of live males brown, sides of body bluish, from CZUT-IC 10582.
humeral region to caudal peduncle, with a lateral irreg- Identification. Body moderately deep (36.9–42.5% SL).
ular series of red spots. Dorsal and anal fins with red Snout slightly rounded (25.9–356% HL). Mouth termi-
spots on basal half, distal half yellow with thin dark pur- nal. First gill arch lacking a prominent epibranchial lobe.
ple band on distal margin. Caudal fin dark purple along Scales in E1 11–18 and E2 6–10. Dorsal fin with 14–16
procurrent rays, distal portion yellow and white. Pecto- spines and 10–12 soft rays, 5th to 6th ray longest, pro-
ral and pelvic fins yellowish. Body coloration of live fe- longed as filament. Anal fin with three spines and 7–10
males brown, with scattered dark blotches along sides. soft rays, 4th to 5th ray longest, prolonged as filament.
Dorsal and anal fins with dark spots. Pelvic and pectoral Caudal fin subtruncate or slightly rounded. In sexually
Albornoz-Garzón et al. | Fishes from Río Alvarado, Colombia 1193
mature specimens, head and first half body with metallic Identification key to orders, families, and species
green spots. Sides of body with nine dark vertical stripes from Río Alvarado drainage, Upper Río Magdalena
and a dark midlateral spot. A vertically dark blotch in Basin, Colombia
the mid of the caudal-fin base. Dorsal fin dark grey, with 1 Body covered with scales; barbels absent..................2
light grey bands and narrow white margin. Caudal fin 1′ Body naked or covered with bony plates; barbels
dark grey with distal portion yellowish (Steindachner present...................................................Siluriformes
1878). 2. Fins without spines; lateral line complete or incom-
plete............................................................................3
Geophagus steindachneri Eigenmann & Hildebrand,
2′ Fins with spines; lateral line interrupted.....................
1910
.............................................................. Cichliformes
Figure 4K
3 Dorsal and pelvic fins present....................................4
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 13, 16.7–44.4 mm
3′ Dorsal and pelvic fins absent........... Gymnotiformes
SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074°
4 Upper jaw not protrusible; adipose fin present (except
55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Cristhian C. Conde-
Erythrinidae).....................................Characiformes
Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT-IC
4′ Upper jaw protrusible; adipose fin absent...................
10111. • 11, 13.8–66.7 mm SL; Quebrada La Caima; 04° .................................................Cyprinodontiformes
35′45.8″N, 075°56′39.6″W; 374 m a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012;
Cristhian C. Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón Characiformes
leg.; CZUT-IC 10159. 1 Upper lip present; premaxilla with conical or multi-
Identification. Body deep (38.1–41.8% SL). Snout mod- cuspid teeth................................................................2
erately pointed (43.4–59.6 % HL). Mouth subterminal 1′ Upper lip absent; premaxilla with spatulate teeth ......
and protractile. First gill arch with prominent epibran- ........Parodontidae: Parodon magdalenensis (Fig. 2C)
chial lobe. Scales in E1 19–20 and E2 13. Dorsal fin with 2 Pectoral-fin with one unbranched ray........................3
16 spines and 13 soft rays, 4th to 5th ray longest, extended 2′ Pectoral-fin with two or more unbranched rays...........
as filaments. Anal fin with three spines and 7–8 soft rays. Crenuchidae: Characidium phoxocephalum (Fig. 2A)
Caudal fin with distal margin concave. Body coloration
3 Adipose fin present; caudal fin not rounded................
brown or light brown. Sides of body with six faint dark
............................................................... Characidae: 4
vertical stripes. A vertically dark blotch at middle of cau- 3′ Adipose fin absent; caudal fin rounded........................
dal-fin. Dorsal fin dark grey, with light dark bands in soft ............. Erythrinidae: Hoplias malabaricus (Fig. 2B)
rays. Caudal fin hyaline with dark spots. Pectoral fin dark
4 Mouth without external teeth on premaxilla.............5
grey. Pelvic and anal fins pale grey or hyaline (Eigen-
4′ Mouth with external teeth on premaxilla....................
mann 1922).
..............................................Roeboides dayi (Fig. 2L)
Kronoheros umbrifer (Meek & Hildebrand, 1913) 5 Mouth with four teeth on inner premaxillary row; fins
Figure 4L usually yellowish or dark...........................................6
Material examined. COLOMBIA • 1, 31.5 mm SL; Río 5′ Mouth with five teeth on inner premaxillary row; fins
Alvarado-Puente; 04°31′11.3″N, 074°59′14.0″W; 521 m usually reddish.........................Astyanax sp. (Fig. 2D)
a.s.l.; 19 Sep. 2012; Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón, Cris- 6 Mouth subterminal; anal fin with 13 or fewer branched
thian C. Conde-Saldaña leg.; CZUT-IC 10178. • 1, 54.9 rays.............................................................................7
mm SL; Río Alvarado-Caldas Viejo; 04°36′41.2″N, 074° 6′ Mouth terminal or superior; anal fin with more than
55′46.2″W; 351 m a.s.l.; 28 Jun. 2013; Cristhian C. 13 branched rays....................................................... 10
Conde-Saldaña, Juan G. Albornoz-Garzón leg.; CZUT- 7 Mouth with three irregular rows of premaxillary
IC 10716. teeth............................................................................8
Identification. Body deep. Snout moderately pointed. 7′ Mouth with two rows of premaxillary teeth................
Mouth terminal. First gill arch lacking epibranchial lobe. .......................................Microgenys minuta (Fig. 2K)
Scales in E1 20–23 and E2 10–13. Dorsal fin with 16– 8 Eye diameter less than 26.8% of head length; third
17 spines and 11–12 soft rays. Anal fin with 6–7 spines. infraorbital not in contact with preopercle..................
Caudal fin rounded. Sides of body with 11 dark vertical ....................................... Creagrutus dulima (Fig. 2G)
stripes and a dark midlateral spot. A vertical dark blotch 8′ Eye diameter more than 27.2% of head length; third
at middle of caudal-fin. Dorsal fin dark grey, with narrow infraorbital in contact with preopercle......................9
red margin along distal portion of spines, soft rays hya- 9 Middle caudal-fin rays with dark stripe; humeral
line. Caudal fin hyaline with dark spots. Pectoral fin hya- blotch vertically elongated; anal fin usually with 11 to
line. Pelvic and anal fins dark with distal portion hyaline 13 branched rays.............. Creagrutus affinis (Fig. 2F)
(Meek and Hildebrand 1913). 9′ Middle caudal-fin rays without dark stripe; humeral
1194 Check List 16 (5)
blotch ovoid; anal fin usually with 9 to 11 branched in posterior region; first pectoral-fin ray and first dor-
rays........................Creagrutus magdalenae (Fig. 2H) sal-fin ray prolonged as filaments ...............................
10 Mouth superior; dorsal-fin origin behind anal-fin ori- .................................... Astroblepus grixalvii (Fig. 4B)
gin....................Gephyrocharax melanocheir (Fig. 2I) 10′ Adipose fin short and low, with visible spine covered
with odontodes; first pectoral-fin ray and first dorsal-
10′ Mouth terminal; dorsal-fin origin anterior to anal-fin
fin ray not prolonged as long filaments.................... 11
origin........................................................................ 11
11 Premaxillary teeth bicuspid; body light brown with
11 Anal fin with more than 30 branched rays; caudal fin
black scattered spots and blotches, sometimes with
without horizontal dark stripe; males with a pouch of
small yellow blotch on adipose-spine base..................
scales at base of caudal fin...........................................
...................................Astroblepus homodon (Fig. 4C)
...........................Argopleura magdalenensis (Fig. 2E)
11′ Premaxillary teeth incisiform; body usually dark,
11′ Anal fin with less than 30 branched rays; caudal fin
with variable light blotch on middle of caudal pedun-
with horizontal dark stripe; males without a pouch of
cle, sometimes with light blotch on posterior region of
scales at base of caudal fin.....Hemibrycon sp. (Fig. 2J)
dorsal-fin base..................... Astroblepus sp. (Fig. 4D)
Siluriformes 12 Head squared in dorsal view, dark lateral band well
defined on body............................................................
1 Body naked.................................................................2
.....................Trichomycterus transandianus (Fig. 3G)
1′ Body covered with plates.....................Loricariidae: 6
12′ Head triangular in dorsal view, dark lateral band
2 Mouth ventral; oral disk present..... Astroblepidae: 10 absent........................................................................ 13
2′ Mouth terminal or subterminal; oral disk absent......3
13 Body with a series of dark lateral spots, usually larger
3 Adipose fin present.....................................................4 than eye; premaxilla with 27 teeth; dentary with 30
3′ Adipose fin absent..................... Trichomycteridae: 12 teeth.................... Trichomycterus banneaui (Fig. 3F)
4 Dendritic pattern of lateral line tubes in skin of snout, 13′ Body with dark spots, usually smaller than eye; pre-
cheek and nape; posterior supraoccipital process con- maxilla with 37 teeth; dentary with 37 teeth...............
tacting nuchal plate ...................................................5 ..........................Trichomycterus mogotensis (Fig. 3H)
4′ Simple pattern of lateral line tubes in skin of snout, 14 Maxillary barbel not reaching pelvic-fin insertion;
cheek and nape; posterior supraoccipital process not adipose fin short (<30% SL), adipose-fin origin equi-
contacting nuchal plate......................... Heptapteridae distant between dorsal fin and caudal fin; body with
(except Pimelodella floridablancaensis): 14 conspicuous transverse pale bands.......................... 15
5 Dark lateral stripe along body; dorsal surface of head 14′ Maxillary barbel reaching pelvic-fin insertion; adi-
pose fin long (>39% SL), adipose-fin origin closer
smooth.................................................. Heptapteridae:
to dorsal fin than the caudal fin; body variably pig-
Pimelodella floridablancaensis (Fig. 3B)
mented, sometimes dark or light brown, often with a
5′ Dark lateral stripe along body absent; dorsal surface
dark lateral stripe along lateral line.............................
of head rough...... Pimelodidae: Pimelodus yuma (Fig.
............................... Rhamdia guatemalensis (Fig. 3C)
3E)
15 Adipose fin triangular; caudal-fin lobes pointed; body
6 Caudal fin with 12 or more rays; adipose fin present
with conspicuous pale transverse bands......................
....................................................................................7
............................. Cetopsorhamdia molinae (Fig. 3A)
6′ Caudal fin with 12 rays; adipose fin absent.................
15′ Adipose fin rounded; caudal-fin lobes rounded; body
..........................Sturisomatichthys leigthoni (Fig. 4A)
with conspicuous pale band behind head and in front
7 Abdomen naked; teeth villiform................................8 of dorsal fin.......Heptapteridae undescribed (Fig. 3D)
7′ Abdomen with plates; teeth spoon-shaped..................
............... Hypostomus (Cochliodon) hondae (Fig. 3K) Gymnotiformes
8 Anterior region of snout naked; whisker-like odon- 17 Caudal fin present; body blotched.......Apteronotidae:
todes on cheek absent.................................................9 Apteronotus eschmeyeri (Fig. 4F)
8′ Anterior region of snout covered with plates; whisker- 17′ Caudal fin absent; body uniformly dark......................
like odontodes on cheek............................................... Sternopygidae: Sternopygus aequilabiatus (Fig. 4E)
................................ Lasiancistrus caucanus (Fig. 3L)
Cyprinodontiformes
9 Head and body gray, usually with small dark spots;
1 Pectoral fin with all rays branched; dorsal and anal
caudal fin with undulated dark stripe at distal mar-
fins origin posteriorly placed; anal fin in males not
gin...................................Chaetostoma milesi (Fig. 3I)
modified into a gonopodium.......................Rivulidae:
9′ Head and body dark brown, sometimes with light Rivulus (Cynodonichthys) magdalenae (Fig. 4G)
spots; caudal fin without undulated dark stripe at dis- 1′ Pectoral fin having unbranched rays; dorsal and anal
tal margin................. Chaetostoma thomsoni (Fig. 3J) fins placed on middle of body; males with anal fin
10 Adipose fin long and deep, with short spine embedded modified into a gonopodium .................Poeciliidae: 2
Albornoz-Garzón et al. | Fishes from Río Alvarado, Colombia 1195
2 Dorsal fin with dark spots; body without dark dots and aquatic natural communities have been well documented
blotches (in both sexes).... Poecilia sphenops (Fig. 4H) and include changes in the trophic network by preda-
2′ Dorsal fin without dark spots; body usually with dark tion of the macroinvertebrate assemblage (Holliztki et al.
dots and blotches (only in males)................................. 2013; Walton et al. 2016), disturbances in the population
......................................... Poecilia reticulata (Fig. 4I) of native fishes by predation of eggs or juveniles stages
(Stockwell and Henkanaththegedara 2011; Schumann et
Cichliformes al. 2015), territoriality (Warburton and Madden 2003),
1 Dorsal fin with 15–16 spines; midlateral blotch and and hybridization (de Brito et al. 2013). Considering
caudal ocellus present................................................. these documented effects resulting from its introduction
................................... Kronoheros umbrifer (Fig. 4L) in non-native areas, we consider necessary to study the
1′ Dorsal fin with 9–11 spines; midlateral blotch and life history of local populations of P. reticulata and P.
caudal ocellus absent..................................................2 sphenops of the Río Alvarado drainage, with the objec-
2 Scales covering half-length of caudal fin; fleshy lobe tive to adequately evaluate the level of negative effects on
in upper region (epibranchial) of first gill arch ........... the structure and dynamics of native fish communities.
............................ Geophagus steindachneri (Fig. 4K) On the other hand, the Río Magdalena Basin has
2′ Scales covering one-third of length of caudal fin; been historically the hydrographic system of Colombia
fleshy lobe in upper region (epibranchial) of first gill with the largest loss of habitat and disturbances (Galvis
arch absent................. Andinoacara latifrons (Fig. 4J) and Mojica 2007; Barletta et al. 2010; Jimenez-Segura
et al. 2016). Particularly, the Upper Magdalena Basin is
not the exception, as evidenced in the Tropical Dry For-
Discussion est biome, which has been intensely fragmented for agri-
We recorded 36 species in the Río Alvarado drainage, culture and cattle (Forero-Medina and Joppa 2010). The
which represents about 16.6% of the total species of the sampling campaigns of this study were carried out seven
Magdalena-Cauca system (DoNascimiento et al. 2019) years ago and some environmental conditions along the
and 29.6% of the Upper Río Magdalena (Villa-Navarro et Río Alvarado drainage could have changed since then
al. 2006). The taxonomic composition did not differ from due to continuous anthropogenic activities, as deforesta-
the general pattern described for South American fresh- tion, land use, and water pollution. The effects of these
water fishes, given the predominance of Characiformes human activities mainly include changes related to hab-
and Siluriformes (Reis et al. 2016; Dagosta and de Pinna itat heterogeneity (Bojsen and Barriga 2002; Cassatti
2019). Particularly, this pattern is also in accordance with et al. 2012) and loss of functional and species diversity
other drainages from the Upper Magdalena Basin (Mon- (Ferreira et al. 2018; Zeni et al. 2019). Accordingly, this
toya-Ospina et al. 2018). raises interest to assess if the composition noted in this
We found a number of species similar to that reported study has changed through time.
in other rivers draining into the Tropical Dry Forest eco- In conclusion, our study intends through provision
system. For instance, Río Anchique drainage (36 spp.), of an annotated list to be the first step to improve our
Río Opia drainage (38 spp.) and Río Venadillo drain- knowledge of the fishes from trans-Andean small drain-
age (34 spp.) (López-Delgado 2013; Montoya-Ospina et ages. However, with the alarming high rate of habitat loss
al. 2018). On the other hand, the greater abundance of along the Río Magdalena Basin is necessary that envi-
Trichomycterus banneaui (19.4%) and Creagrutus affi- ronmental authorities implement management measures
nis (13%) in the Río Alvarado drainage is in accordance to sustain habitat quality of small drainages, which can
to the observed by Montoya-Ospina et al. (2018) in the be acting as refuges of fishes at regional scales.
Río Anchique drainage, where both species were also
the most abundant. The high abundance of these species
may due to their opportunistic life strategies, specifi-
Acknowledgements
cally, their small adult body size, rapid sexual maturity, We are grateful to the team of the Grupo de Investig-
and a high reproductive effort (Winemiller 1989, 2005; ación en Zoología (GIZ) who helped us during the sam-
Winemiller et al. 2008). plings. Funding was provided by the Comité Central de
Among the species found in our study, four are cat- Investigaciones y Desarrollo Científico de la Universidad
egorized as threatened: Characidium phoxocephalum as del Tolima (Project number 90213). This manuscript was
vulnerable, and Kronoheros umbrifer, Hypostomus hon- enriched and improved by the helpful comments from G.
dae, and Microgenys minuta as near threatened (Mojica Echevarría, D. Taphorn and C. DoNascimiento.
et al. 2012). Likewise, we found two non-native spe-
cies along the basin, Poecilia reticulata and P. sphe-
nops which are invasive species widely distributed in
Authors’ Contributions
aquatic environments, due to its use as biological con- JGAG, CCCS and EOLD collected the specimens; JGAG
trol for diseases vectored by mosquitoes, as well as orna- and CCCS identified the specimens; JEGM and CCCS
mental aquarium fish (Axelrod et al. 1986; Chandra et photographed the specimens; JGAG, CCCS and FAVN
al. 2008). The impacts of the invasive poeciliids on the wrote the manuscript; all authors reviewed the text.
1196 Check List 16 (5)
scriptions of four new species. Notulae Naturae 73: 1–10. de Lucena CAS (2000) Revisão taxonômica e filogenia das espécies
Galvis G, Mojica JI (2007) The Magdalena River freshwater fishes and transandinas do gênero Roeboides Günther (Teleostei: Ostario-
fisheries. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 10 (2): 127– physi: Characiformes). Comunicações do Museu de Ciências e
139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980701357640 Tecnologia da PUCRS, Sér. Zoologia 13: 3–63.
García-Alzate CA, Taphorn DC, Román-Valencia C, Villa-Navarro Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Ortega-Lara A, Usma-Oviedo JS, Galvis G,
FA (2015) Hyphessobrycon natagaima (Characiformes: Characi- Villa-Navarro F, Vásquez, L Prada-Pedreros S, Rodríguez CA
dae) a new species from Colombia, with a key to the Magdalena (2005) Peces de los Andes de Colombia. Guía de campo. Instituto
basin Hyphessobrycon species. Caldasia 37: 221–232. https://doi. de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos “Alexander von Hum-
org/10.15446/caldasia.v37n1.51228 boldt,” Bogotá, 346 pp.
García-Melo JE, Albornoz-Garzón JG, García-Melo LJ, Villa-Na- Mattox GM, Bifi AG, Oyakawa OT (2014) Taxonomic study of Ho-
varro FA, Maldonado-Ocampo JA (2018) A new species of Hemi- plias microlepis (Günther, 1864), a trans-Andean species of tra-
brycon (Characiformes, Characidae, Stevardiinae) from the upper hiras (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Erythrinidae). Neotropical
Magdalena River basin in Colombia. Journal of Fish Biology 92 Ichthyology 12 (2): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-
(6): 1929–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13634 20130174
García-Melo L (2009) Relaciones filogenéticas de Trichomycterus (Si- Meek SE, Hildebrand SF (1913) New species of fishes from Panamá.
luriformes: Trichomycteridae) en el Alto Magdalena. M.Sc. dis- Field Museum of Natural History, Publications, Zoölogical Series
sertation, Universidad del Tolima, Ibague, 171 pp. 10 (8): 77–91.
García-Melo L, Villa-Navarro FA, DoNascimiento C (2016) A new Miles C (1943) Estudio económico y ecológico de los peces de agua
species of Trichomycterus (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae) from dulce del Valle del Cauca. Secretaria de Agricultura y Fomento
the upper río Magdalena basin, Colombia. Zootaxa 4117 (2): 226– del Valle. Cespedesia 2 (5): 9–63.
240. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4117.2.6 Miles C (1947) Los peces del río Magdalena. Ministerio de la Eco-
Harold AS, Vari RP (1994) Systematics of the trans-Andean species of nomía Nacional, Sección de Piscicultura, Pesca y Caza, Bogotá,
Creagrutus (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae). Smithso- 214 pp.
nian Contributions to Zoology 551: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.5479/ Miranda R, Tobes I, Gaspar S, Peláez-Rodríguez M (2018) Patterns
si.00810282.551 in the distribution of fish assemblages and their association with
Henn AW (1916) On various South American poeciliid fishes. Annals
habitat variables in the Suaza River on its way through the Cueva
of the Carnegie Museum 10 (1–2): 93–142.
de los Guácharos National Park, Colombia. Écoscience 25 (1): 85–
Hernández CL, Ortega-Lara A, Sánchez-Garcés GC, Alford MH
95. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2017.1419447
(2015) Genetic and morphometric evidence for the recognition of
Mojica JI, Franco R (1990) Estructura y evolución tectónica del valle
several recently synonymized species of trans-Andean Rhamdia
medio y superior del Magdalena, Colombia. Geología Colombi-
(Pisces: Siluriformes: Heptapteridae). Copeia 103 (3): 563–579.
ana 17: 41–64.
https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-14-145
Mojica JI, Usma JS, Álvarez-León R, Lasso CA (2012) Libro rojo de
Holitzki TM, Mackenzie R, Wiegner TN (2013) Differences in eco-
peces dulceacuícolas de Colombia 2012. Instituto de Investig-
logical structure, function, and native species abundance between
ación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Instituto
native and invaded Hawaiian streams. Ecological Applications 23:
de Ciencias Naturales de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia,
1367–1383. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0529.1
WWF Colombia and Universidad de Manizales, Bogotá, 319 pp.
Hulen KG, Crampton WGR, Albert JS (2005) Phylogenetic systematics
Montoya-Ospina DC, Villa-Navarro FA, López-Delgado EO (2018)
and historical biogeography of the Neotropical electric fish Ster-
Composición y estructura de peces de la microcuenca del río An-
nopygus (Teleostei: Gymnotiformes). Systematics and Biodiver-
chique, Tolima, Colombia. Revista de Biología Tropical 66 (1):
sity 3 (4): 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477200005001726
336–351. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v66i1.27530
Ibagón N, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Cioffi MDB, Dergam JA (2020)
Ortega-Lara A, Milani N, DoNascimiento C, Villa-Navarro F, Mal-
Chromosomal diversity of Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformes,
donado-Ocampo JA (2011) Two new trans-Andean species of Im-
Erythrinidae) along the Magdalena River (Colombia—northern
South America) and its significance for the Neotropical Region. parfinis Eigenmann & Norris, 1900 (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae)
Zebrafish 17 (3): 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2019.1827 from Colombia. Neotropical Ichthyology 9: 777–793. https://doi.
Jiménez-Segura LF, Ortega H, Chuchtaya J, Jiménez-Prado P, Car- org/10.1590/S1679-62252011000400009
vajal-Vallejos FM, Rivadeneira JF, Mojica JI, Mesa LM, Sán- Poeser FN (2003). The evolution and systematics of the genus Poe-
chez-Duarte P, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Correa V, Chocano L, cilia Bloch and Schneider, 1801. PhD dissertation. Universiteit
Velásquez MA, Hidalgo M, Usma S, Lasso CA, Anderson PE, van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 180 pp.
Villa-Navarro FA, Tognelli MF (2016) Capítulo 3. Estado de con- Poveda-Cuellar JL, López-Delgado EO, Villa-Navarro FA (2018)
servación y distribución de los peces de agua dulce de los Andes Efecto de la cobertura vegetal de ribera en las comunidades ícti-
Tropicales. In: Tognelli MF, Lasso CA, Bota-Sierra CA, Jiménez- cas en el bosque húmedo premontano y muy húmedo premontano
Segura LF, Cox NA (Eds) Estado de conservación y distribución del Alto Magdalena, Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colom-
de la biodiversidad de agua dulce en los Andes Tropicales. UICN, biana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 42 (163): 216–226.
Gland, Cambridge y Arlington, 23–55. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.623
Londoño-Burbano A, Reis RE (2019) A taxonomic revision of Stur- Provenzano R, Villa-Navarro FA (2017) A new species of the cat-
isomatichthys Isbrücker and Nijssen, 1979 (Loricariidae: Lori- fish genus Cordylancistrus (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) from the
cariinae), with descriptions of three new species. Copeia 107 (4): Magdalena River, Tolima, Colombia. Zootaxa 4294 (5): 522–530.
764–806. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-19-226 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4294.5.2
Londoño-Burbano A, Román-Valencia C, Taphorn DC (2011) Taxono- Regan CT (1904) A monograph of the fishes of the family Loricar-
mic review of Colombian Parodon (Characiformes: Parodontidae), iidae. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 17 (1):
with description of three new species. Neotropical Ichthyology 9: 191–350.
709–730. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011000400003 Reis RE, Albert JS, Di Dario F, Mincarone MM, Petry P, Rocha LA
López-Delgado E (2013) Composición y estructura de la comunidad (2016) Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. Jour-
de peces y sus relaciones con la calidad de la vegetación riparia nal of Fish Biology 89 (1): 12–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13016
y algunas variables ambientales en dos ríos de bosque seco trop- Román-Valencia C, Vanegas-Ríos JA, Ruiz-C R (2008) Una nueva es-
ical (Bs-T), Tolima (Colombia). M.Sc. dissertation. Universidad pecie de pez del género Bryconamericus (Ostariophysi: Characi-
del Tolima, Ibagué, 362 pp. dae) del río Magdalena, con una clave para especies de Colom-
1198 Check List 16 (5)
bia. Revista de Biología Tropical 56 (4): 1749–1763. https://doi. García-Melo LJ, Herrada-Yara ME (2006) Peces del alto Magda-
org/10.15517/rbt.v56i4.5757 lena, cuenca del río Magdalena, Colombia. Biota Colombiana 7
Román-Valencia C, Ruiz-C RI, Taphorn DC, Mancera-Rodriguez (1): 3–21.
NJ, García-Alzate CA (2013) Three new species of Hemibrycon Villa-Navarro FA, García-Melo LJ, Zúñiga-Upegui PT, García-Melo
(Characiformes: Characidae) from the Magdalena River Basin, JE, Quiñones-Montiel JM, Albornoz-Garzón JG, Conde CC, Re-
Colombia. Revista de Biología Tropical 61: 1365–1387. https://doi. inoso-Florez G, Gualtero-Leal DM, Ángel-Rojas VJ (2014) His-
org/10.15517/rbt.v61i3.11965 toria de vida del bagre Imparfinis usmai (Heptapteridae: Siluri-
Romero-Duque LP, Rosero-Toro JH, Fernández-Lucero M, Sim- formes) en el área de influencia del proyecto hidroeléctrico El
baqueba-Gutierrez A, Pérez C (2019) Trees and shrubs of the trop- Quimbo, alto río Magdalena, Colombia. Biota Colombiana 15 (2):
ical dry forest of the Magdalena River upper watershed (Colom- 111–126.
bia). Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e36191. https://doi.org/10.3897/ Walton SE, Ahmad AB, Gan HM, Bolland JD (2016) A newly iden-
BDJ.7.e36191 tified population of Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard, 1853), a
de Santana CD, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Severi W, Mendes GN (2004) non-native invasive species, in Lake Kenyir, Malaysia: implica-
Apteronotus eschmeyeri, a new species of ghost knifefish from the tions for management. BioInvasions Records 5: 107–114. https://
Magdalena Basin, Colombia (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae). doi.org/10.3391/bir.2016.5.2.08
Zootaxa 410: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.410.1.1 Warburton K, Madden C (2003) Behavioural responses of two native
de Santana CD, Maldonado-Ocampo JA (2005) Apteronotus milesi, Australian fishes (Melanotenia duboulayi and Pseudomugil signi-
new species of ghost knifefish (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae) fier) to introduced poeciliids (Gambusia holdbrooki and Xiphoph-
from the Cauca River, with a key to apteronotids from the Magda- orus helleri) in controlled conditions. Proceedings of the Linnean
lena-Cauca basin, Colombia. Ichthyological Exploration of Fresh- Society of New South Wales 124: 115–123.
waters 6: 223–230. Winemiller KO (1989) Patterns of variation in life history among
Schumann DA, Hoback WW, Koupal KD (2015) Complex interactions South American fishes in seasonal environments. Oecologia 81:
between native and invasive species: investigating the differential 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379810
displacement of two topminnows native to Nebraska. Aquatic In- Winemiller KO (2005) Life history strategies, population regula-
vasions 10: 339–346. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2015.10.3.09 tion, and implications for fisheries management. Canadian Jour-
Steindachner F (1878) Zur Fischfauna des Magdalenen-Stromes. An- nal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 872–885. https://doi.
zeiger der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, org/10.1139/f05-040
Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe 15 (12): 88–91. Winemiller KO, Agostinho AA, Caramaschi EP (2008) Fish ecology
Stockwell CA, Henkanaththegedara SM (2011) Evolutionary conser- in tropical streams. In: Dudgeon D (Ed.) Tropical stream ecol-
vation biology. In: Evans JP, Pilastro A, Schlupp I (Eds) Ecology ogy. Academic Press, San Diego, 107–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/
and evolution of poeciliid fishes. The University of Chicago Press, B978-012088449-0.50007-8
Chicago, 128–377. Zeni JO, Pérez-Mayorga MA, Roa-Fuentes CA, Brejão GL, Casatti L
Vanegas-Ríos JA (2016) Taxonomic review of the Neotropical ge- (2019) How deforestation drives stream habitat changes and the
nus Gephyrocharax Eigenmann, 1912 (Characiformes, Characi- functional structure of fish assemblages in different tropical re-
dae, Stevardiinae). Zootaxa 4100: 1–92. https://doi.org/10.11646/ gions. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
zootaxa.4100.1.1 29 (8): 1238–1252. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3128
Villa-Navarro FA, Acero PA, Cala-Cala P (2017) Taxonomic review of Zúñiga-Upegui PT, Villa-Navarro FA, García-Melo LJ, García-Melo
Trans-Andean species of Pimelodus (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae), JE, Reinoso-Flórez G, Gualtero-Leal DM, Ángel-Rojas VJ (2014)
with the descriptions of two new species. Zootaxa 4299: 337–360. Aspectos ecológicos de Chaetostoma sp. (Siluriformes: Loricari-
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4299.3.2 idae) en el alto río Magdalena, Colombia. Biota Colombiana 15
Villa-Navarro FA, Zúñiga-Upegui PT, Castro-Roa D, García-Melo JE, (2): 81–94.