Save 25% on Digital Shop Now

PSYC HO LO GY | O P I N I ON

There’s a Psychological ‘Vaccine’ against Misinformation

A social psychologist found that showing people how manipulative techniques work can create resilience
against misinformation

By Daisy Yuhas on March 13, 2023

Credit: tatianazaets/Getty Images

Misinformation can feel inescapable. Last summer a survey from the nonprofit Poynter
Institute for Media Studies found that 62 percent of people regularly notice false or
misleading information online. And in a 2019 poll, almost nine in 10 people admitted to
having fallen for fake news. Social psychologist Sander van der Linden of the University of
Cambridge studies how and why people share such information and how it can be stopped.
He spoke with Mind Matters editor Daisy Yuhas to discuss this work and his new book,
Foolproof: Why Misinformation Infects Our Minds and How to Build Immunity, which
offers research-backed solutions to stem this spread.

[An edited transcript of the interview follows.]

In Foolproof, you borrow an analogy from the medical world, arguing that
misinformation operates a lot like a virus. How did you come to that
comparison?

I was going through journals and found models from epidemiology and public health that are
used to understand how information propagates across a system. Instead of a virus
spreading, you have an information pathogen. Somebody shares something with you, and you
then spread it to other people.

That led me to wonder: If it’s true that misinformation spreads like a virus, is it possible to
inoculate people? I came across some work from the 1960s by Bill McGuire, a psychologist
who studied how people could protect themselves from “brainwashing.” He had a very similar
thought. That connection led to this whole program of research.

[Read more about scientifically backed strategies to fight misinformation]

How do we get “infected”?

A virus attacks by exploiting our cells’ weak spots and hijacking some of their machinery. It’s
the same for the mind in many ways. There are certain cognitive biases that can be exploited
by misinformation. Misinformation infects our memories and influences the decisions that
we make.

One example is the illusory truth bias. That’s the idea that just hearing something repeatedly
—even if you know that it is wrong—makes it seem more true. These learned automatic
associations are part of how the brain works.

In your research, you’ve extended the virus metaphor to argue that we can
vaccinate ourselves against misinformation through a technique that you call
“prebunking.” How does that work?

Prebunking has two parts. First is forewarning, which jump-starts the psychological immune
system because it’s sleeping most of the time. We tell people that someone may want to
manipulate them, which raises their skepticism and heightens their awareness.
The second part of the prebunk is analogous to providing people with a weakened dose of the
virus in a vaccine. For example, in some cases, you get a small dose of the misinformation
and tips on how to refute it. That can help people be more resilient against misinformation.

In addition, we have found that there are general techniques used to manipulate the spread of
misinformation in a lot of different environments. In our studies, we have found that if you
can help people spot those broader techniques, we can inoculate them against a whole range
of misinformation. For instance, in one study, people played a game [Bad News] to help them
understand the tactics used to spread fake news. That improved their ability to spot a range
of unreliable information by about 20 to 25 percent.

So you help people recognize and resist incoming misinformation broadly by

alerting them to the techniques people use to manipulate others. Can you walk
me through an example?

Sure. We created a series of videos in partnership with Google to make people more aware of
manipulative techniques on YouTube. One is a false dichotomy, or false dilemma. It’s a
common tactic and one that our partners at Google alerted us to because it’s present in many
radicalization videos.

Prebunking Manipulation Techniques: False Dichot…

Dichot…

In a false dichotomy, someone incorrectly asserts that you have only one of two options. So
an example would be “either you’re not a good Muslim, or you have to join ISIS.” Politicians
use this approach, too. In a U.S. political context, an example might be: “We have to fix the
homelessness problem in San Francisco before we start talking about immigrants.”
In our research, we have exposed people to this concept using videos that explain false
dichotomies in nonpolitical scenarios. We use popular culture like Family Guy and Star
Wars. People have loved it, and it’s proved to be a really good vehicle.

So in our false dichotomy video, you see a scene from a Star Wars movie, Revenge of the
Sith, where Anakin Skywalker says to Obi-Wan Kenobi, “If you’re not with me, then you’re
my enemy,” to which Obi-Wan replies, “Only a Sith deals in absolutes.” The video cuts to
explain that Anakin has just used a false dichotomy.

After seeing a video like this, the next time you’re presented with just two options, you realize
somebody may be trying to manipulate you.

In August you published findings from a study with more than 20,000 people
viewing these videos, which called out techniques such as false dilemmas,
scapegoating and emotionally manipulative language. What did you learn?

What we find is that, using these videos, people are better able to recognize misinformation
that we show them later both in the lab and on social media. We included a live test on the
YouTube platform. In that setup, the environment is not controlled, and people are more
distracted, so it’s a more rigorous test.

These videos were part of an ad campaign run by Google that had millions of views. Google
has now rolled out videos based on this research that are targeted at misinformation about
Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees in Europe. They are specifically helping people spot the
technique of scapegoating.

In the book, you point out that many people who think they are immune to
misinformation are not. For instance, in one survey, almost 50 percent of
respondents believed they could spot fake news, but only 4 percent succeeded.
Even “digital natives” can fall for fake content. Can this happen to anyone?

A lot of people are going to think that they’re immune. But there are basic principles that
expose us all. For example, there is an evolutionary argument that’s quite important here
called the truth bias. In most environments, people are not being actively deceived, so our
default state is to accept that things are true. If you had to critically question everything, you
couldn’t get through your day. But if you are in an environment—like on social media—where
the rate of misinformation is much higher, things can go wrong.

In addition to biases, the book highlights how certain social behaviors and
contexts, including online echo chambers, skew what we see. With so many
forces working against us, how do you stay optimistic?

We do have biases that can be exploited by producers of misinformation. It’s not easy, given
all of the new information we’re exposed to all the time, for people to keep track of what’s
credible. But I’m hopeful because there are some solutions. Prebunking is not a panacea, but
it’s a good first line of defense, and it helps, as does debunking and fact-checking. We can
help people maintain accuracy and stay vigilant.

Are you a scientist who specializes in neuroscience, cognitive science or psychology? And
have you read a recent peer-reviewed paper that you would like to write about for Mind
Matters? Please send suggestions to Scientific American’s Mind Matters editor Daisy Yuhas
at pitchmindmatters@gmail.com.

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or
authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Daisy Yuhas edits the Scientific American column Mind Matters. She is a freelance science journalist and
editor based in Austin, Tex. Follow Yuhas on Twitter @DaisyYuhas Credit: Nick Higgins

Recent Articles by Daisy Yuhas

Your Response to Stress Improves as You Grow Older

Why Social Media Makes People Unhappy--And Simple Ways to Fix It

Why Sleep-Deprived People Are More Selfish and Lonely

Scientific American is part of Springer Nature, which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them
can be found at www.springernature.com/us). Scientific American maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments
in science to our readers.

© 202 3 SCI ENT I FIC A ME RI C AN , A D IVISION OF SP RINGER NA TU RE A ME RICA, INC.

A LL RIG HTS RE SE RVE D.