Professional Documents
Culture Documents
iŒÛa@åí†Ûa@ý• Z @sybjÛa@kÛbĐÛa@…a†Çg@åß@@ÞbÔß
•@ @ý@@M@ïíìÛa@ßb¨a@†àª@òÈßbu@êa‰ìn׆Ûa@Ñ
>D k O# d .A f,- o> & W"A :&K!i R 2m- hCD &7) 5[q6 ¢)i
) "12> :s &" - 2) q- (dq F"% L > ) :& pO
> j M % - &d - L&r - ]K 57>E >D k (Y &7) 5[q6 s /ª X)i j
22) _ & !,# - ) N< F"%
k&Km ¢) R y + o> > o> i - &7) 5[q6 j =r< - 2A X) o> C
32) ` 5- 4 ¸ 7A RA >D &7) 5[q6
>5[q6 yi j Yd| C oK &7) 5[ql (C ! R 5 A s L&YA ) )i o
:sA $! j #"% - (7> Nq !,# - > ) :& .D j 4baA > o> Z
)4(7
- 1ﺴﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﻁﻤﺎﻭﻱ" :ﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺴﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺴﺘﻌﻤﺎل ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻁﺔ" ﺍﻝﻁﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻝﻰ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻨﺸﺭ .1950 ،ﺹ.223 :
- 2ﺭﺃﻓﺕ ﻓﻭﺩﺓ" :ﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ" ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻫﺭﺓ .1994 ،ﺹ.166 :
- 3ﻤﺤﻤﻭﺩ ﻋﺎﻁﻑ ﺍﻝﺒﻨﺎ" :ﺍﻝﻭﺴﻴﻁ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ :ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻝﻐﺎﺀ ﻭﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻭﻴﺽ" ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻔﻜﺭ ﺍﻝﻌﺭﺒﻲ ،ﺒﺩﻭﻥ ﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺸﺭ .ﺹ.349 :
-4ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺒﺎﻴﻨﺔ " :ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻐﺭﺏ" ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺘﻭﺒﻘﺎل ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ.1985 ،ﺹ.233 :
162
©@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ
' - 2^ S& - o> 2> ) Nq F"% ) >D ' - & ]U =rq I&C
) +D c 'i } 2) N< F"% m ¢)i &7) 5[q6s 2> N< c
12b R O j 4 @ D 5W, 2) :sA &"i j 2bA O" ) & D R; Yd
y + O" 5[q6 nzY > ei - Yz&i 2> K"# - Yz&i K"# D 5[q6 nzY > P- ei m
57>E# 2& - ) zY D - 2Y - ]K# 4> 6 :) +D > o> di &7) 5[q6 6
2]UV C" # ) - a< - s3 &7> - & - ]#O' 47>- 7 # !Ki
:Ji m I&¤ 2) Y 7 (s E!/ U) =r< R P 5- Y &7) 5[q6 > L* U s
>7Z s- _&¥ O7J 4/6 nzY > ¥ P6 E!/ - s6# P- &7> 5[q-
3s6 &) 8 > S 4 !V &) * U zY ¹# +D RD )i R & W" s
E!V o> 2i &7) 5[q6 j <A `# b& UA 7)i &,,6 m # Y z
R (7) k[< 4qK _ R z [ - rA E!V o> 2i k7)"A & W" KA
)23 _U +D 4qK ) O { z k7)"A kUs- ) k ")s &7) 4E<A k7
44 @ * j E!V K1D &) 8 (>P
)< 3 M K j &> &7) 5[q6 O .7 bA :7)A k&J -
Ji z O3 k L1 {56 IJKA} Y !i &7) 5[q6 2O )&K. ¦ - M TPA
{( IJKA} O&m =q T- /
(' $c - A$0
"D pOi - > o> 2i - O&s =r<µ &7) 5[q6 - , q- z 2OA )&K. e
&> Jd :
` 5- 4 ¸ 7A >RA >D &7) 5[q6 k&Km ¢) R y + o
)52
(Y &,,- > 1 1 6FO&q )" +,6 "C 2OA zY 7U
- 4ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﺭﻀﺎ ﺠﻨﻴﺢ" :ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ" ،ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﺍﻝﻨﺸﺭ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻤﻌﻲ ،ﺘﻭﻨﺱ ،2008 ،ﺹ.359 :
- 5ﻤﺤﻤﻭﺩ ﻋﺎﻁﻑ ﺍﻝﺒﻨﺎ ،ﻤﺭﺠﻊ ﺴﺎﺒﻕ ،ﺹ.349 :
-6ﻤﺴﻌﻭﺩ ﺸﻴﻬﻭﺏ" :ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻭﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ :ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ" ،ﺩﻴﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﺒﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻤﻌﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻝﻁﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝﻰ،
.2000ﺹ 174ﻭﻤﺎ ﺒﻌﺩﻫﺎ.
163
©@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ
7P i R A 56 o> _i 5[q6 s y z# > o> Kd 5[q6 'i -
) > :. > 7&,R / D 23 s L - ' @ RA >s &7) 5[q6
@ ' 1 ) o> @ Yd &7) 5[q6 4's
2) q- Nq F"% zi -
> Jd :& D 5[q6 nzY pOi -
)A &" # &Um j (" S m j 4 56 & 2OA zY f'i m
j fA ]A C & - &7> 4E< k'< "& | z ]K - &s ¢> S\' hC#
'&" 2> [q ¢)s
>_&,i o> k7> I&C &7) 5[ql & X) zY @ ]U * s 5C - o
O- L &7> R[q- 4baA 5[q6 T^ 7'8 ¢> z 3Effimieff &Um j Y!i OO
+D pOi } 5[q6 s ( # / &' k'<i > ]# 4>D D pOi M > R[q- D M
4> Jd :& D
- 1ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ﺭﻗﻡ 2002/281ﺵ ﺕ ،ﺤــــﻜـﻡ ،58 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺜﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻭﻡ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺍﺩﺭﻴﺴﻲ ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻝﺒﻠـﺩﻱ
ﺍﻝﻤﻭﺤﺩ ﻝﻤﺩﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﺠﺩﺓ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭ.
ﻭﺘﻌﻭﺩ ﺘﻔﺎﺼﻴل ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﺃﺤﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻝﺠﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺇﺼﺎﺒﺘﻪ ﺒﺼﻌﻘﺔ ﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ،ﺃﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻝﺠﻤـﺎﻋﻲ
ﻝﺴﻴﺩﻱ ﺍﺩﺭﻴﺱ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻀﻲ ﺒﺈﺼﻼﺡ ﺍﻝﻤﺼﺎﺒﻴﺢ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻭﻤﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺍﺴﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﺸﺎﺤﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﺼﺼﺔ ﻝﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻐﺭﺽ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺫﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻴﻥ ﻝﻡ ﻴﺘﺨـﺫﺍ
ﺍﻻﺤﺘﻴﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﻝﺘﻔﺎﺩﻱ ﻤﺜل ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﺩﺜﺔ ﻗﺒل ﺇﻗﺩﺍﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺼﻼﺡ ﺒﺎﻝﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺒﺘﻭﻗﻴﻑ ﺘﺸﻐﻴل ﺍﻝﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻲ ،ﻭﻜﺫﺍ ﺇﻴﻘﺎﻑ ﺃﻱ ﺘﻤﺎﺱ
ﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻲ ﻤﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﺒﺎﻝﺸﺎﺤﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻤﻠﺔ ﻝﻠﻌﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﺯﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺤﺩﻯ ﺯﻭﺍﻴﺎﻫﺎ ﻤﻠﺘﺼﻘﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺨﻴﻭﻁ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﺒﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺼﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻓﻘﺔ ﺒﻤﺤﻀﺭ
ﺍﻝﻀﺎﺒﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﺌﻴﺔ ،ﻤﺸﻴﺭﻴﻥ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻬﺎﻝﻙ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻁﻠﺏ ﺴﺎﺌﻕ ﺍﻝﺸﺎﺤﻨﺔ ﺒﺈﺤﻀﺎﺭ ﻜﻭﺏ ﻭﻗﻨﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻤﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻭﻀﻊ ﻴـﺩﻩ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻝﺸـﺎﺤﻨﺔ
ﺍﻝﻤﺫﻜﻭﺭﺓ ﺤﺘﻰ ﺃﺼﻴﺏ ﺒﺎﻝﺼﻔﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻓﺴﻘﻁ ﺃﺭﻀﺎ ﻭﻫﻭ ﻴﺭﺘﻌﺵ ﻝﻴﻠﻔﻅ ﺃﻨﻔﺎﺴﻪ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻭﻫﻭ ﻤﺎ ﺘﺅﻜﺩﻩ ﺘﺼﺭﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺸﻬﻭﺩ ﺒﻤﺤﻀﺭ ﺍﻝﻀﺎﺒﻁﺔ
ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻨﻪ ﺍﺴﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻤﻘﺘﻀﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺎﺩﺓ 79ﻤﻥ ﻕ ل ﻉ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻝﺒﻠﺩﻱ ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻻ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻷﺨﻁﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﺼﻠﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﻜﺒﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻑ ﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻴﻪ
ﺍﻝﻤﺫﻜﻭﺭﻴﻥ.
168
@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ©
j `8 ' ( # LO1 4s ]* `>7 ) P ¡C j K"i m E!V zY D I&C
X " ¡ A 4s D h- z E! 'iA K S O* j zA U > ) .
z
LY 25000.00 ¹K j `>7 :J"A ) hi 7'J7 !" R7>D D I&C
>7 g - n >- zA )K" i/ C k' LY 5000 ¹K j y Q C k'
LY 85000.00
4 !V D 3 # &7) 4 @ &#d D ]1- ^ .&CR +# K S 2&m 2> D
o> zA Sa7 > P6 & W" k&7 *" &s E!/ ¢) Ú(\#O' & O'<
&"A (dq E!/ S& &s E!/ k'< y + - K>
J4, ! " B $ R ,j )8= l
`# 4qKA m ) - y + o) U j K"A (7) oKA )s k7)" z N< Y :iA
- &7> C j q- o> 4aq Tm :sA j &,,- &) ¢)i oKA 57), &JU
nD LY K> ]1- "* &O
P K&d > i N< ' I&¤ ]#O' ^[ ]A :sg &"A y z i ¢)
.&"&\ 4 U d D [ ¢) O &" 4
K1- +D RD O& W" > 4 @ o)i s :iA :J z U C j @ & W"A f,- > -
.i N< +D C j ) &d # m 6G-
& o> O" {)i ) &d 4># T z O' R 4 @ o)i s É[ # U :% D -
.1!/ Q7), :iA '7 oC ) Y, &7) (KA
o> 4 @ & W" mD kU ]U - K 5[q6 &"7 % P6 T zY -
y z# h 7 E!/ # & W"A E!V o> ]# & W"A `# , 23 Y z rA E!V f,-
Q ) - ' #)d &JU &)P "Js S& K> (P n'# (, k&<& +,6
j Q 'i 4 ¸ &)m &)P K> y z ' &i E!/ ' K z 4 @ E!/ K1D
2K) * 7O &7) 5[q6 4 j &C6 -
، ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻐﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ، ﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻤﺅﻝﻔﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﺎل ﺠﺎﻤﻌﻴﺔ،" "ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻐﺭﺒﻲ، ﺤﺴﻥ ﺼﺤﻴﺏ- 2
. ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭ،{ ﻀﺩ ﻓﺭﻴﻕ }ل/ ﺴﻁﻴﻑ/ ﺭﺌﻴﺱ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﻝﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ ﻗﻨﺯﺍﺕ،1985 – 40108 ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺭﻗﻡ- 3
- 1ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ﺭﻗﻡ 2003/668ﺵ.ﺕ ،ﺤــــﻜـﻡ ،252 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺜﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻭﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﻨﺎﻭﻱ ﻀـﺩ
ﻭﺯﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﺸﻐﺎل ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻭﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭ.
-ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗﻡ 2003/621ﺵ.ﺕ ،ﺤــــﻜـﻡ ،2005/304 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ ﻤﻭﻻﻱ ﺃﺤﻤﺩ ﻋﻴﺎﺸﻲ ﻀﺩ ﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ 2
ﺍﻝﻘﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﺎﺌﻨﺔ ﺒﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﺯﺍل. - 2ﻭﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺴﻘﻭﻁ ﻁﻔل ﻓﻲ ﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻭﻓﺎﺘﻪ ،ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﺃﻨﺠﺯﺕ ﻝﺘﺨﺯﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻴﺎﻩ ﺤﻔﺭﻫﺎ ﺴﻜﺎﻥ
ﺃﻗﺎﻡ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺤﻘﻭﻕ ﺍﻝﻁﻔل ﺩﻋﻭﻯ ﺃﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﻐﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺴﻁﻴﻑ ﻀﺩ ﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ ﻋﻴﻥ ﺃﺯﺍل ،ﻓﻘﻀﻰ ﺒﺘﺤﻤﻴل ﺍﻝﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﺴﻘﻭﻁ ﺍﻝﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺕ ﺤﺭﺍﺴﺔ
ﺍﻝﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ ﻤﻊ ﺇﻝﺯﺍﻡ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﺨﻴﺭﺓ ﺒﺎﻝﺘﻌﻭﻴﺽ.
ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺍﻷﻤﺭ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻷﺸﻐﺎل ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻭﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭ ﺒﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺨﺼﺔ ﺒﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﻷﺸﻐﺎل ﻓﺈGﻬﺍ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺼﺎﺤﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﺸﻐﺎل ﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﻭﺃGﻬﺍ ﺘﻤﺕ ﺘﺤﺕ ﺇﺸﺭﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺇﺩﺍﺭLﻬﺍ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻀﺤﻴﺔ
ﻝﻸﺸﻐﺎل ﻭﻻ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻭ ﻤﺠﺭﺩ ﻁﻔل. ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻐﻴﺭ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻝﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﻷﺸﻐﺎل ،ﻓﻬﻭ ﻝﻴﺱ ﻤﺴﺘﻌﻤﻼ
ﻭ ﻝﻘﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﻘﺭ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﺄ ،ﺒل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ،ﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﻝﻴﺱ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺸﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﻷﺸﻐﺎل ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﺔ .ﻓﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ
ﺇﺤﺩﺍﺙ ﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﻴﻌﺩ ﻤﺸﺭﻭﻋﺎ ﻋﻤﻭﻤﻴﺎ ﺫﻭ ﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﺨﻁﻴﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻐﻁﺎﺓ ﻭ ﻋﻴﺭ ﻤﺤﺎﻁﺔ ﺒﺴﻴﺎﺝ ﻴﺤﻭل ﺩﻭﻥ ﻭﺼﻭل ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎل ﺇﻝﻴﻬﺎ ﻝﻬﻭ ﺸﺭﻭﻉ ﺨﻁﻴﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺇﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﺭ ﻴﺠﻌل ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ،ﺫﻝﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺤﻔﺭ ﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﺩﺍﺨل ﻤﺤﻴﻁ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﻴﺔ ﻴﺸﻜل ﺨﻁﺭﺍ ﻴﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻤﺎ ﻴﺠﻭﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺘﺤﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻝﺨﻭﺍﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻤﺒﺩﺃ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﻭﺍﺓ ﺃﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻋﺒﺎﺀ
ﻋﻨﻪ. ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﺔ.ﻓﺘﺭﻙ ﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺴﻴﺎﺝ ﻴﻌﺩ ﺨﻁﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺘﺴﺄل ﺍﻝﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﺘﻪ ﻴﺎﺴﻤﻴﻨﺔ ﺒﻭﺭﺍﺱ ،ﻤﺭﺠﻊ ﺴﺎﺒﻕ ،ﺹ 67 :ﻭ .68
A@ A/: - 3ا&| l.ث ،!)Bاh< E#ء O)8Bا و' ،اe8ء اول ،دار ه ،'Bص.17 :
172
©@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ
7 Oi&&C *] 5 * & &" &Um j 2005w02w17 v # 1 4*# @ 7'u 7'8 m
(
O, ( ) & &\#O ,- k7 (Y &', 5^ Fm 47>6 nzY k ]<D D I&C
"Oi !/ h R z b&&7 ms 5.6 p. O& D 5 2) b*C k)* :
) > _P - ~[ OJi m P6 > & W"A ]b* k7J ]#O' {. 'A k
() 5.6 O R m ) yi - K> o> 'A & W" ]R p !V
b&&7
mD (', _7 Fm :" O, C &\#O 47>- &K# ]#O' {. 'A 2&m D
> & W"A ]b* &7 ¢ b&&7 () [d 5.6 p. O"i &J b*C
&\#O )d# LO# D ]* 5.6 ]RWY O# Fd m P6
Oi&&C *] 78 (m &" &Um j 2007w10w30 v # 2=# # @ p,R 7'8 m
( 7
[ 'i - ( ) & &\#O ,- k7 (Y &', 5^ Fm 47>6 nzY k ]<D D
b&&7 ms 5.6 p. O& D 5 2) b*C mD 2> (\#O' !V * > k7 -
OJi P6 > & W"A ]b* k7J ]#O' {. 'A k) Oi !/ h R z
[ yi - 2 /6 zY & W" ]R p y + s !V > Y D oC D k#
) b&&7 () M (>A k M 5.6 O R m
` &> o>A 'A o> O1 k)* `s! `# & W"A !<i 7'u Ei y z )Ki D I&C
O& &\#O' ,6 nzY 9 ) i # Km j nd &JU ( o> `&mK
, A >* )# C &Um !,#
*] ( 7 Oi&&C C 8 # 4&" &Um j 2004w12w07 v # 3 4*# @ 7'u m
- 1ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ﺭﻗﻡ ،2002/309ﺤــــﻜـﻡ ،44 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ :ﺍﻤﺠﻴﺩ ﺠﻼل ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻭﻜﺎﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺠﺎﺭﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝـﻭﻁﻨﻲ
ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭ.
- 2ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ﺭﻗﻡ 2007/13ﺵ.ﺕ ،ﺤــــﻜـﻡ ،321 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ :ﺼﺩﻭﻗﻲ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﻀـﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘـﺏ
ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭ.
- 3ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ﺭﻗﻡ 2001 /133ﺵ.ﺕ ،ﺤــــﻜـﻡ ،313 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩﺓ ﺒﻥ ﻤﺤﺩﺍﺩ ﺤﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻀـﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘـﺏ
ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭ.
173
©@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ
y" g 2m z Y ]#O' {. 'A - &s Tb R c s 1% & W" N 7&s D I&C
'& W" 2&m 5| R y + s k)# , m y" zY - s o> &>A 5b Fm ]O
z } 27s z 4Y 4 * D Q) kd m * - & g 5 } - 7&, R
k'< # &Ki I&C - &>A 5b Fm (\#O' y" ' I&C ], ^ .&CR
s 500 D im kdi (\#O &i o> | - 7&,R =, - i P 7d !A
O&> , D (\#O' y" =, j k'q E# LY"i } &>A &!)A nzY 2- D I&C
]#O' {. 'A :i> o> O'# oKi & W"A s Qb s<# Y*i ]1- 4Eas
*] UV # ^ J&s CA 1 &Um j 2005w02w15 v # 1 4*# @ 7'u m
( 7 Oi&&C
D O#Y+ > Y Oi YdKi 2) ' Q D 1% Tm & W" 'A k&7 N 7&s D I&C
&\U !#U UJg ]* o> O> !P _s zQ OdJi )# 7'u s O k" dm 4%
/ !A , o> !/ k'<i 1% O# )m 4% - Q `Ki n >- )* D <A
& > - qD # Oi Æ &\ !g _i , F # O1CD Æ 4 zA 4% - I&¤ z
b '" - RD ^ .&CR _&79 2m m '# 'A ]> - 'A 4 !/ Pi
"&* z/- &> ( # '" # 2 g L> o> - o> m Y ]A# b dm >PA
i dm f C _P - 4% # 1u # [q- ]OD o> k7) _P ^ .&CR
'A - Wi h/- m k'<i `>A 1 Y D - 1% Tm - y + O'<i !/6
r D O7> kd &\A 4% - , 11 O, ^aR ' Q - / i.&C } &> o>A
zY j A _s ) ' c zA !#U U8 # "C , A F # *i Xd
n)K, `) f,- o> {K d
¡% Tm #D ' Q 4z&7 ' &. &#r 4 ^ D & W"A k&7 N 7&s D I&C
"& W" - Y ]Um m O&> "A > `# s O# f i , A 4O> & W
- 1ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ﺭﻗﻡ 2003/886ﺵ .ﺕ ،ﺤــــﻜـﻡ ،29 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩﺓ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺜﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻭﻤﺔ ﻓﺘﻴﺤﺔ ﻏﺎﺯﻱ ﺒﻨـﺕ
ﻝﺨﻀﺭ ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭ.
ﻭﺘﻌﻭﺩ ﺃﺴﺒﺎﺏ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻭﻤﺔ ﻏﺎﺯﻱ ﻓﺘﻴﺤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺜﺭ ﻏﺭﻗﻬﺎ ﺒﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﻤﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻜﺎﺌﻨﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻘﺭﺏ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺘﺩﺭﺱ ﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻫـﺫﻩ
ﺍﻝﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺴﺒﺒﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻫﻼﻙ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻭﻤﺔ ,ﻗﺎﻤﺕ ﺒﺤﻔﺭﻫﺎ ﻤﺼﺎﻝﺢ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺭﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺠﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺭﻜﺘﻬﺎ ﻤﻤﻠﻭﺀﺓ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺎﺀ ﺒﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻱ ﻋﻼﻤـﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺇﺸﺎﺭﺓ ﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺨﻁﻭﺭﺘﻬﺎ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻝﻡ ﻴﺘﻡ ﺇﻨﺸﺎﺀ ﺃﻱ ﺤﺎﺠﺯ ﺃﻭ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺸﺄﻨﻪ ﺍﻝﺤﻴﻠﻭﻝﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺨﻁﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻗﺩ ﺘﺴـﺒﺒﻬﺎ ﺘﻠـﻙ ﺍﻝﺤﻔـﺭﺓ
ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﻴﺒﺔ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ.
174
©@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ
o> p<A L)A p. _m d U# y + K1@ * E!/ o> 2i 2> k'<# f A
m j ¢A d% > &[i O, ' , A m 4z&7 D 5% ^ j - 4z&7
S& , A / ¡% Tm ' - 7 y + N 7&s d * `K } 'A s ¡%
- – 4% – ](< , C d# r E!/ o> 2i 'A & W" k#A j - O/#
& <A &!)A \ UCi Y ^ .&CR _&79 2m - `K - &> & W"A nzY
K1# &m & k& - * R 5% ^ j - 4Ym 4m - (\as k'<# _m m ¡% - - n >- O& D
n)K, `) L&, f,- o> {K y z zA _s ) ' Y y +
> ) # K !A -K ' #1 ¡% > 'A & W" 'i `)s zY )K,# D I&C
",W `>7 % P6
:&K!i ' D I&¤ &,,- ¢) &7) 5[q6 > P6 .D j [ d> s ÉÆ
1qK k'<# E!V f,- o> & W"A 2&m &s )d z @ & W"A 23
) =< * D Ji O)&K. s É&7) 5[q6 > @ & W"A 23 j U )&K. -
7 >< Jdg S - 8 - W &dq U ' - j ' ) k# U
.(7) k[< U `# 4qK m ) 'i - > U ' -
( 7&s "as &7) 5[q6 > L* U -
&7> 5[q- ^xD > ¥ U ' -
2&7> 5[q- *# ) qD * 2) (7> k[q z&i 2> > ¥ U ' -
.(7> oK & 2> - ], > ¥ U ' -
- (7> k[q D Y d ) O J\ - 1 n& :s (7> oK , ], > ¥ U ' -
.(7> oK
5[q6 > ¥ P6 E" 6 d% R 5A k&K, o> (Y 7\ nzY j 4 P6 -
)k[< # m > U )&K. "# p? "C @ (P !" D )i &7
)#" &&C a, 7 (7
-ﻭﻫﻭ ﻤﺎ ﺠﺴﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺄﻤﻴﻥ " "Le soleilﺤﻴﺙ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺭﺕ ﺍﻝﻐﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺩﻡ ﺍﻹﺸﺎﺭﺓ ﻝﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ 2
ﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﻋﻤﻭﻤﻲ} ﻤﺒﻨﻰ ﻋﻤﻭﻤﻲ{ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺴﺒﺒﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺤﺩﻭﺙ ﻀﺭﺭ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﺍﻝﻀﺤﻴﺔ.
ﺇﺫ ﺘﺘﻠﺨﺹ ﻭﻗﺎﺌﻊ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﻤﺴﺎﻓﺭ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺘﻥ ﺸﺎﺤﻨﺔ ﺼﻐﻴﺭﺓ ﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﺒﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﺒﻥ ﻋﻜﻨﻭﻥ ﺒﺴﺒﺏ ﺍﺼﻁﺩﺍﻡ ﺴﻘﻑ .ﺍﻝﺸﺎﺤﻨﺔ ﺒﺸﺠﺭﺓ ﺘﺸﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻴﻕ.
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﺘﻪ ﻴﺎﺴﻤﻴﻨﺔ ﺒﻭﺭﺍﺱ ﻭﻤﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺎ ،ﻤﺭﺠﻊ ﺴﺎﺒﻕ ،ﺹ.67 :
175
©@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ
>O*R !i $&, O^ j &P) >6 7\ P6 o> 7\ )A nzY C* o
M /ª &) OP- o> oK& Y^ M (\U O*R - M /6 zY _ } zOs Q / (\U
- ) 5[q6 `)A `# b& I&C ¡% Tm 3% &JU o> &s " M #, q- 7
_* 6 &di P6 > ) - I&C &1 O* [ `# O* O&s ` <A
j r E!/ > 7\ ¡Ji &\U 2'C6 - `C j Oi,R 3 & _ E!V 23 D s
)- &> & W"A kJ (' k[< F + j E!/ * O&s r ]K j &> - &d 2
&d 57>- - Ki - O&)s E!V O> )Ki - 4 @ - +D - 1> & 2b g 2m - K
- &" &Um j 1996 & 27 v # d n m j o>6 S y z# m- 7 7&, &)P j
2© K> /
& S'> 5[q6 nzY O> D ) E!V f,- o> & W"A 23 D nzY TU/D oK
"R =< 2 [ O&7 5)A S&s E!/ & W"A 23 &"i 5[q6 O> 2> K
3 &"i
Peuplier &U# V O< # z (\U FO&q )" +,6 < d zY j
4JP [ `# ) :sA {()} (7)" `# b&&7 &s O3 z de Montrouge
LOU)# as 2[6# )7" 5.6 `C o&,7 y< o> 4aq !, > FKY ]1Es
>O&m o> k& K m `i #g 5.6 >7 LY M JU S ¢
JU )i S s ) &d #
1
- Jean du Bois Gaudissons, "L’usagers du service public administratif", L.G.D.J, Paris, 1974, p 203 et ss.
-ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺭﻗﻡ ،500ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ﺭﻗﻡ ،96/06/27ﻤﻠﻑ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻋﺩﺩ ،95/1/5/865 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ ﺃﻴﺕ ﺨﺭﺼﺔ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﷲ ،ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ 2
-ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ،ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﺩﺩ ،121 :ﺍﻝﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2007/03/14 :ﻤﻠﻑ ﻋﺩﺩ 4/06/11 :ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ 1
ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ.ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ،ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﺩﺩ ،53 :ﺍﻝﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2007/02/12 :ﻤﻠﻑ ﻋﺩﺩ 2/06/103 :ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ
ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺼﺎﻝﺢ ﻝﻠﺸﺭﺏ.ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ،ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﺩﺩ ،350 :ﺍﻝﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2007/05/30 :ﻤﻠﻑ ﻋﺩﺩ:
6/06/04ﻀﺩ ﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ "ﺍﻻﻭﻻﺩ".
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻗﻡ ،500ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ﺭﻗﻡ ،96/06/27ﻤﻠﻑ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻋﺩﺩ ،95/1/5/865 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ ﺃﻴﺕ ﺨﺭﺼﺔ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﷲ ،ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ
ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻹﺼﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﺩﺠﻨﺒﺭ ،2000ﺍﻝﻌﺩﺩ ،51ﺹ.55 :
-2ﻤﻴﺸﻴل ﺭﻭﺴﻲ" ،ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻐﺭﺏ" ،ﺘﺭﺠﻤﺔ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﻫﺒﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﻝﺠﻴﻼﻝﻲ ﺃﻤﺯﻴﺩ ،ﻤﻁﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ ،ﺍﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ،1993 ،ﺹ .199-197
-3ﻤﻴﺸﻴل ﺭﻭﺴﻲ ،ﻤﺭﺠﻊ ﺴﺎﺒﻕ ،ﺹ .199
178
@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ©
1 '<A U `# ) 4E<A - k[< `# 4qK &KK, !# *
s &KK" m ) U j 7A M &!V M @ & W"A# )A ) =< D sPD
&7) 5[q6 K"# &!V & W"A# / .q (\U O*R _m N, m
) R 7\ P Y & W"A 2& *"A U ' - # R 2 7> #> +,6 "Js
- M E!/ # M ) *"A &7) 5[q6 P j =r< 3R.Chapus +,6 - `C j
i !/ ^ & D 3 > > {JU > ^ & D 3 >} / &&C '
&7Y- h
P6 - 7\ P6 > & W"A# h, ) R "* U & d/ (.°<s® É+D
&JU &)P > 3 [# 2i Y M &!V M & W"A s y z / 7&"* 7\ (Os )
& h &7) 5[q6 K"# &!V & W"A 2& *"A U N\dV n, ) j
K"# )m m P6 'i > - Ui "* U & d/ - 4A.De Laubadère
* Oi !§ ^ai P6 yi 'i - > 7C P6 'i I&C 5[q6 F
a ) ]K>6 ¢)i ) P6 O"*
)K"µi +D &JU O >7 O _sA `# , 4 P j 7's & & V -
:u y + km- 5[q6 >7a7 :u 7& \s ' > X - ) !" & W"
5&s " ]U _m A De Laubadère & y z FU &JU
:i> o> _ s C ', ' * :. :q K"# &' k/ &[i D (>A !U >
u yi - / _s 5[q6 :| } (>A 6 k/A &[i "i & W" K
5>7a7
)K"&s &'A $C o> - =< zY :K! z'Y C S m U ' - (Os É & V -
Y 5&s U =<# - h> 5Km =<# - j =< zY :) , b\% )i
'i - ([K E!/ & W"A f,- o> &7) 5[q6 h> kKi (' - FO&q )" +,6
# R D M ][ @ h> j 5% Y 7 M dm ) JdA 'i - Y (' R Jd (>7
6V j JdA 4's _ @ j JdA 4's Ji Y :C D 4" 'i -
-1ﻓﻭﺯﺕ ﻓﺭﺤﺎﺕ " ،ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻡ" ،ﺍﻝﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ،ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ،ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﺔ ،ﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻠﺒﻲ ﺍﻝﺤﻘﻭﻗﻴﺔ2004 ،
-2ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﺩﺩ ،62ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ "Martin" 1959/07/16ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻝﺴﻨﺔ ،1960-1957ﺹ .189
ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﷲ ﺤﺩﺍﺩ " ،ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﻋﻭﻯ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝـﻘﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻐﺭﺒﻲ" ،ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻜﺎﻅ ،ﺍﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ،1999 ،ﺹ .189
-ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ،ﺤﻜــــﻡ ،19 :ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗــﻡ 2004/121 :ﺵ -ﺕ ،ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2007/01/30 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ ﺃﺭﺼﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻓﻕ ،ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ
3
ﺤﻴﺜﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻫﻲ" :ﻤﺎﺩﺍﻤﺕ ﺍﻷﻀﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻼﺤﻘﺔ ﺒﻤﻨﺯل ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻲ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺘﺴﺭﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﺎﺀ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺠﺩﺭﺍﻨﻪ ﻤﻥ ﻗﻨﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺸﺭﻭﺏ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺼﺎﻝﺢ ﻝﻠﺸﺭﺏ
ﺒﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭل ﻋﻥ ﺼﻴﺎﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﻨﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺫﻜﻭﺭﺓ ﻴﺘﺤﻤل ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﻷﻀﺭﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻭﻴﺽ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺤﻕ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ".
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ،ﺤﻜــﻡ ،163 :ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗــﻡ 2002/41 :ﺵ.ﺕ ،ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2005/06/21ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ ﺒﻨﻌﻤﺭﻭ ،ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺤﻴﺜﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻫﻲ:
ﻤﺎﺩﺍﻤﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﺩ ﻗﺎﻤﺕ ﺒﻤﺩ ﻗﻨﻭﺍﺕ ﺼﺭﻑ ﻤﻴﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﻤﻁﺎﺭ ﻭﺠﻌﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﺼﺏ ﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺭﺽ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻲ ،ﻓﺈﻨﻬﺎ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻷﻀﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻼﺤﻘﺔ ﺒﺎﻷﺭﺽ
ﺍﻝﻤﺫﻜﻭﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻭﻴﺽ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﻠﺯﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻜﻔﻴﻠﺔ ﻝﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻝﻀﺭﺭ.
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ،ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗـﻡ 2002/13 :ﺵ ﺕ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﺭﻗــﻡ ،65 :ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ 6 :ﻤﺎﻴﻭ ،2003ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻝﺒﺼﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺒﻨﻲ ﻤﻴﻤﻭﻥ ﻀﺩ ﺒﻠﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﻌﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ
ﺤﻴﺜﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻫﻲ:
"ﺇﻥ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻝﺒﻠﺩﻱ ﺒﺎﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻻﺤﺘﻴﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺩﻩ ﻝﻘﻨﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻴﺎﻩ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﺩﻤﺔ ﻭﺠﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺘﺼﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺭﺽ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻴﺘﻴﻥ ،ﻴﺠﻌﻠﻪ ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻻ ﻋﻥ ﻜل ﺍﻷﻀﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻨﺎﺘﺠﺔ ﻋﻥ
ﺫﻝﻙ ،ﻭﻤﻠﺯﻤﺎ ﺒﺈﺯﺍﻝﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻭﻴﺽ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ".
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ،ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗـﻡ 2003/886 :ﺵ .ﺕ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﺭﻗﻡ ،29 :ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،05/02/15 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺜﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻭﻤﺔ ﻓﺘﻴﺤﺔ ﻏﺎﺯﻱ ﺒﻨﺕ ﻝﺨﻀﺭ ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ
ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺤﻴﺜﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻫﻲ:
ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻻ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﻀﺭﺭ ﺍﻝﻼﺤﻕ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺩﻋﻴﻥ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﻤﻭﺭﺜﺘﻬﻡ ﺒﺴﺒﺏ ﺴﻘﻭﻁﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﺩﺜﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻓﻪ ﻤﺎﺩﺍﻡ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻝﻤﺎ ﺒﺨﻁﻭﺭﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻝﻡ
ﻴﺘﺨﺫ ﺍﻻﺤﺘﻴﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﻝﺘﻔﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﻗﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﺩﺙ.
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ،ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗـﻡ 03/844 :ﺵ .ﺕ ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﺭﻗﻡ ،92 :ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2005 /4/ 12 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ :ﻓﺎﻁﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺭﻁﺒﻲ ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ
ﺤﻴﺜﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻫﻲ:
ﺇﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻙ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻲ ﻤﻤﺭﺍ ﻓﻭﻕ ﻤﻨﺯل ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻭ ﻤﺘﺭ ﻭﺍﺤﺩ ﻴﺸﻜل ﻀﺭﺭﺍ ﺤﺎﻻ ﻴﺘﻌﻴﻥ ﺩﺭﺅﻩ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻻ ﻝﻘﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻀﺭﺭ ﻴﺯﺍل.
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺠﺩﺓ ،ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗـﻡ ،2002/309 :ﺤﻜﻡ ﺭﻗﻡ ،44 :ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2005/02/17 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ :ﺍﻤﺠﻴﺩ ﺠﻼل ﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺤﻴﺜﻴﺔ
ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻫﻲ:
ﺇﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ﺒﺘﺜﺒﻴﺕ ﺃﻋﻤﺩﺓ ﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺤﺩﻴﺩﻴﺔ ﺴﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺴﻠﻕ ﻗﺭﺏ ﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﺴﻜﺎﻨﻲ ﻭﺩﻭﻥ ﺇﻗﺎﻤﺔ ﺤﻭﺍﺠﺯ ﻝﻠﺤﻴﻠﻭﻝﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺘﺴﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻑ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎل ﺍﻝﺼﻐﺎﺭ
ﻭﻤﻨﻌﺩﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻤﻴﻴﺯ ﻴﺒﺭﺭ ﺘﺤﻤﻴﻠﻪ ﺠﺯﺀﺍ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻷﻀﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻗﺩ ﻴﺼﺎﺏ ﺒﻬﺎ ﻫﺅﻻﺀ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎل ﻤﻥ ﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺇﺼﺎﺒﺘﻬﻡ ﺒﺼﻌﻘﺔ ﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ.
ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﺭﺒﺎﻁ ،ﻤﻠﻑ ﺭﻗـﻡ 2007/13 :ش.ت ،ﺤﻜﻡ ﺭﻗﻡ ،321 :ﺒﺘﺎﺭﻴﺦ ،2007/10/30 :ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﺩ Q :و< :Bﻀﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ
ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺤﻴﺜﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﻜﻡ ﻫﻲ:
ﻭﺤﻴﺙ ﺇﻥ ﺇﻨﺸﺎﺀ ﻤﺜل ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺩﺓ ﻗﺭﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺯل ﺴﻜﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺘﺤﻤل ﺃﺴﻼﻜﺎ ﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻝﻲ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﻐﻠﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺘﺤﻤل ﻋﻼﻤﺎﺕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﺭ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻲ ،ﻭﻋﺩﻡ
ﺇﻗﺎﻤﺔ ﺤﻭﺍﺠﺯ ﻝﻌﺩﻡ ﺍﻝﻭﺼﻭل ﺇﻝﻴﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻑ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎل ﻭﻓﺎﻗﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺘﻤﻴﻴﺯ ﺍﻝﺫﻴﻥ ﻻ ﻴﺩﺭﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺨﻁﻭﺭﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﺠﻌل ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ﻴﺘﺤﻤل ﺠﺯﺀ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ
180
©@ @ …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2013@ŠíaÏ@@ÉiaŠÛa@…†ÈÛa æìãbÔÛaë@éÔÐÛa@òÜ
# y + j (\U O*R - (Y d zY j O&a"i ' 3C A oKi zY
5 / 7) h"A o> O&P YC # (s6 h"A o> E!V & W"A j _,i
<= & W"A 23 &"A q6 4\ * &# :) 6 D Y, - V
E!/
% -KA mD i&. j 7U 2> *# E!/ & W"A 23 &7) 5[q6 > & W"A 23 D
M @ & W"A j Os) R M / .q ]U =rq j oa&s J - " m j &K!i
&m O - & K>R 4> g & W"A 5 :&&Ui d% C - &m #g (Y
& W"A ]>@ FK,- N&i j &1 & W"A m@ R- E!V =rq 2> j oa&s -KA mD -
> KK, ¢) R (\a K" s S') o> s 4Y 4 &JU E!/ D &7) 5[q6
&) KK, [ E!/ U- ¢) R 7 M &!V & W"A j 5% Y 7 M & W"A ]>@ FK,-
o> N Y ' > k7) F K" # &\, C j y z n¢> m S - & W"A
1[ T* h> j C
5a" A ' 1- m &7) 5[q6 4 j dmR .A +D s 5 k7
], @ (\U O*R N 7&s b !i p)i ^ R O- O.q O3 O)&K. 5C
UA
ﺍﻷﻀﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻠﺤﻘﻬﺎ ﻝﻠﻐﻴﺭ ﺒل ﺇﻥ ﺤﺘﻰ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻼﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﺭ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻜﺎﻑ ﻻﻨﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﺨﻴﺭ ﻤﺎﺩﺍﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻤﺎﺕ ﻗﺩ ﻻ ﻴﺩﺭﻜﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻁﻔﺎل -
ﻤﺜل ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻲ -ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺼﺭﻴﻥ ﻭﻤﻨﻌﺩﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻤﻴﻴﺯ.
ﻭﺤﻴﺙ ﺇﻨﻪ ﺘﺒﻌﺎ ﻝﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﺭﺘﺄﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺘﺸﻁﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺅﻭﻝﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻭﺠﻌل ﺜﻠﺜﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻝﺜﻠﺜﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﻗﻴﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻝﻲ ﺍﻝﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﻝﺘﻘﺼﻴﺭﻩ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺭﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﺒﻨﻪ
ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺼﺭ ﻭﺘﺭﻜﻪ ﻴﻠﻌﺏ ﺒﺠﻭﺍﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﺴﻼﻙ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻤﻴﻬﺎ ﺒﻭﺍﺴﻁﺔ ﻗﻀﻴﺏ ﺤﺩﻴﺩﻱ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺭﺠﻭﻋﻪ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ.
ﻭﺤﻴﺙ ﺇﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻴﺨﺹ ﺍﻷﻀﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻝﺤﻘﺕ ﺒﺎﻝﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺇﺼﺎﺒﺘﻪ ﺒﺎﻝﺼﻌﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺒﺘﺭ ﻴﺩﻴﻪ ﻤﻌﺎ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻲ ﻗﺩ ﺃﺩﻝﻰ ﺒﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻁﺒﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺨﺒﻴﺭ
ﺨﺎﻝﺩ ﺒﻭﻋﻴﺎﺩ .
ﻭﺤﻜﻤﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺄﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺘﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﻁﻨﻲ ﻝﻠﻜﻬﺭﺒﺎﺀ ﻓﻲ ﺸﺨﺹ ﻤﻤﺜﻠﻪ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻨﻭﻨﻲ ﻝﻔﺎﺌﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻋﻲ ﻤﺒﻠﻎ ) 300.000,00ﺩﺭﻫﻡ(.
- 1ﻤﺴﻌﻭﺩ ﺸﻴﻬﻭﺏ ،ﻤﺭﺠﻊ ﺴﺎﺒﻕ ،ﺹ.192 :
181