Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JEE Redox Notes1
JEE Redox Notes1
Redox Reactions
Classical Concept of Oxidation
01 Addition of Oxygen
2Mg(s) + O2(g) 2MgO(s)
02 Removal of Hydrogen
Addition of an
04
electronegative element
Zn(s) Zn2+(aq) + 2e-
Removal of an
05
electropositive element
Classical Concept of Reduction
01 Addition of Hydrogen
C2H4(g) + H2(g) C2H6(g)
02 Removal of Oxygen
△
03 Gain of electron 2HgO(s) 2Hg(l) + O2(g)
Addition of an
04
electropositive element
Cu2+(aq) + 2e− Cu(s)
Removal of an
05
electronegative element
Oxidation Number
O.N. of Naᐩ = +1
Less E.N. = Positive O.N.
Examples
H+ Ca2+ Cl ̶
Rules for Finding Oxidation Number
O.N. of H = +1 O.N. of H = -1
Examples Examples
O.N. of O = –2 Examples
Examples
H 2O 2 Na2O2 BaO2
H2O CO2 SO2
Rules for Finding Oxidation Number
O.N. of Na+ = +1
O.N. of Mg2+ = +2
= =
Electrons in Electrons in
valence shell valence shell - 8
Range of Oxidation Numbers
Oxidation
n - 18 ≤ number ≤ n - 10
Calculated
O.S. = 8
Maximum
O.S. = 6
O.S. of Some Oxygen Containing Compounds
H2S2O8
Calculated
O.S. = 7
Maximum
O.S. = 6
O.S. of Some Oxygen Containing Compounds
Oxidation number of some
oxygen containing compounds
4
3x - 4 = 0 ⇒ x=
3
Average Oxidation 4
number of Carbon = 3
Paradox of Fractional Oxidation Number
4 4 4
+ + +
3 3 3
Average oxidation
number of C atoms
+2 +0 +2
Actual oxidation
number of C atoms
Paradox of Fractional Oxidation Number
5
4x - 12 = -2 ⇒ x=
2
Average Oxidation 5
number of Sulphur = 2
Paradox of Fractional Oxidation Number
+2.5 +2.5
+2.5
Average oxidation
number of S atoms
+2.5
0 +5
+5
Actual oxidation
number of S atoms
0
Oxidising and Reducing Agent
Examples Examples
+2 +7 +3 +2
Fe2+ (aq) + MnO− 4 (aq) Fe3+ (aq) + Mn2+(aq)
Oxidation
+2 +3
Fe2+ Fe3+
+7 +2
−
MnO4 Mn2+
Combination
Decomposition
Redox
Displacement
Reactions
Disproportionation
Comproportionation
Combination Reactions
A + B C
C A + B
X + YZ XZ + Y
Reduction
0 −1 +5
I2 (s) + NaOH (aq) NaI (aq) + NaIO3 (aq)
Oxidation
It is reverse of disproportionation.
Oxidation
−1 +5 0
I− (aq) + IO − (aq)
3 I2 (aq)
Reduction
Intramolecular Redox Reaction
Oxidation
+5 −2 −1 0
2KClO3 (s) 2KCl (s) + 3O2 (g)
Reduction
It is defined as the
change in oxidation
state per molecule.
It is also known as
valence factor.
H2SO3 H2SO4
Find the oxidation state of the element on the
Step 1
reactant and the product side which changes its
oxidation state in the reaction
+4 +6
H2SO3 H2SO4
6 - 4 = │2│
+4 +6
H2SO3 H2SO4
Step 3 If the number of atoms of an element is different between
the reactant and the product side, balance them.
4─3 = 1
nf for H2C2O3 ⇒ 2x1
+3 +4
H2C2O3 CO2
⇒ 2
Calculation of nf for different Species
nf =│Charge│
⇒
NaCl ⇒ nf = 1 Na+, Cl-
Na+ ⇒ nf = 1
⇒
Al2(SO4)3 ⇒ nf = 6 Al3+, SO42-
SO42- ⇒ nf = 2
Calculation of nf for different Species
Number of H+ ions
an acid donates H3PO2 ⇒ nf = 1 1 −OH bond
Remember!!!
nf can’t be zero
or negative
nf can be a fraction!
Balancing of
Redox Reactions
Balancing of Redox Reactions
1
Oxidation
Atom Number
Balance Method
Methods
2
Ion
Charge
Electron
Balance
Method
Oxidation Number Method
Balancing of Redox Reactions
Generally balancing is
carried out in 2 media
+7 +2 +2 +3
MnO4− (aq) + Fe2+ (aq) Mn2+ (aq) + Fe3+ (aq)
Oxidation Number
Reduction
decreases by 5 units
Step 2
Finding the nf
+7 +2 +2 +3
MnO4− (aq) + Fe2+ (aq) Mn2+ (aq) + Fe3+ (aq)
nf of MnO4− = │(7 − 2) × 1│ = 5
nf of Fe2+ = │(2 − 3) × 1│ = 1
Oxidation Number Method
Step 4
Balancing the elements
Step 5
Balancing the O atoms
MnO4− (aq) + 5Fe2+ (aq) Mn2+ (aq) + 5Fe3+ (aq) + 4H2O (l)
For an Acidic Medium
xH2O 2xH+
For an Acidic Medium
MnO4− (aq) + 5Fe2+ (aq) + 8H+ (aq) Mn2+ (aq)+ 5Fe3+ (aq) + 4H2O (l)
3ClO− (aq) + 2CrO2─ (aq) + H2O (l) 3Cl− (aq) + 2CrO42─ (aq) + 2H+ (aq)
For a Basic Medium
Add to both sides the same
number of OH─ as there are H+
3ClO− + 2CrO2─ + H2O (l) + 2OH─ 3Cl− (aq) + 2CrO42 ─ + 2H+ + 2OH─
3ClO−(aq) + 2CrO2─ (aq) + H2O (l) + 2OH─(aq) 3Cl− (aq) + 2CrO42 ─ (aq)+ 2H2O(l)
For a Basic Medium
Cancel any H2O that
you can
3ClO−(aq) + 2CrO2─ (aq)+ 2OH─(aq) 3Cl− (aq) + 2CrO42 ─ (aq)+ H2O (l)
Given Mass
No. of Gram Eq. = Gram Equivalent Mass
Given Mass
= Molar Mass/nf
Given Mass
= Molar Mass
× nf
= Moles × nf
Normality
Number of gram
Normality = equivalents of solute
Volume of the solution (L)
Number of gram
equivalent of
solute present Number of moles of solute
in 1 litre of the = Volume of the solution (L)
× nf
solution
= Molarity × nf
Law of Equivalence
N1V1 = N2V2
MnO4− (aq) + 5Fe2+ (aq) + 8H+ (aq) Mn2+ (aq) + 5Fe3+ (aq) + 4H2O (l)
Example :
Diphenylamine, K2Cr2O7 is less powerful
Potassium oxidizing agent than KMnO4.
Ferricyanide
Titration Using Potassium Dichromate
Orange
Reaction 1
Z + X (Excess) Product 1
Reaction 2
X (Remaining) + Y Product 2
Back Titration
4 gm of contaminated
chalk, CaCO3
+ 200 ml, 0.5N HCl
(1) (2)
Back Titration
Volume of
N1V1 = N2V2
excess HCl, V1 = 50 mL
0.5 × V1 = 0.5 × 50
m.eq. of m.eq. of titrant
excess HCl = (NaOH)
m.eq. of HCl
m.eq. of Chalk = used for chalk = 75
Reaction 2
Reaction 3
Color Transition
Indicator
Range
Intermediate
Titrant
Product
(Basic Salt)
NaHCO3 (aq) + HCl (aq) NaCl (aq) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l)
Acidic
pH of the solution
further goes down.
Remeber !!!
Double Indicator Titration
Indicator - Phenolphthalein
Iodometric Titration
unknown
0 −1
I − (aq) + S4O6 (aq)
2− 2−
I2 (g) + S2O3 (aq)
Based on the
tendency to
get oxidised
or reduced
Unit: Volt
Standard Electrode Potential
Electrode Potential
Oxidation Reduction
Potential (OP) Potential (RP)
Oxidation Potential
Representation Representation
o o
E E Cu(s)
H2O2 / O2 / Cu2+(aq) = −0.34 V
Example of Oxidation Potential
Oxidation half
Representation
o
E Zn(s) / Zn2+(aq) = +0.76 V
Reduction Potential
Representation Representation
o
E Cu2+(aq) / Cu(s) = 0.34 V
o
E Zn2+(aq) / Zn(s) = −0.76 V
Example of Reduction Potential
Reduction half
Representation
o
E
H2O2 / H2O
Electrochemical Cell
Electrochemical cells
01
Completes the circuit.
02
Maintains electrical neutrality in the
solution of both half cells.
03
Provides anions to the oxidation half cell and
cations to the reduction half cell.
Redox Couple
Represented as Ma+/M
Increasing strength of
0.34
oxidizing agent
Cu2+ + 2e- → Cu (s)
reducing agent
2H+ + 2e- → H2 (g) 0.00
Fe2+ + 2e- → Fe (s) -0.44
Calculation of EMF
of the cells.
02
Comparison of strength
03 of oxidising and
reducing agent.