Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/360515153
CITATIONS READS
0 382
4 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Igouzal Mohammed on 11 May 2022.
Hanane Es-sebyty 1, Bouchra Abbi 1, Elena Ferretti 2 and Mohammed Igouzal 1,*
1
Laboratory of Electronic Systems, Information Processing, Mechanics and Energetics Department of
Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, 14000 Kenitra, Morocco.
2
Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering DICAM, Alma Mater
Studiorum Università di Bologna 40136 Bologna, Italy
* Corresponding author: mohammed.igouzal@uit.ac.ma ; Tel. 212673540318
Abstract:
Additive Manufacturing (AM) with concrete, also known as 3D Concrete Printing (3DCP), is an
emerging technology in the construction industry. Automating the placement of concrete materials
may improve construction efficiency by eliminating the need to erect formwork, improve
infrastructure durability by providing precise control of concrete formulations, and improve
construction safety by removing humans from hazardous working environments. In this work, we
proceed to sizing, conception and assembly of a mini concrete 3d printer in a laboratory scale. The
rheological of the mixture used is studied in order to find an optimal composition that pass the tests
pumpability, extrudability, workability and buildability. Materiel used for printing is a mixture of
water, sand, concrete and rice husk.
Keywords: 3D concrete printing, 3DCP
1-Introduction
In recent years the role of additive manufacturing in the construction industry has become
increasingly important. In particular, concrete 3D printers have been continuously gaining popularity
among architects and construction firms. Two kinds of 3DCP are commonly used; Gantry and
Robotic (figure 1).
(a) (b)
Figure 1: (a) Gantry (crane-like) concrete 3D printers (b) Robotic concrete 3D printers
The Gantry uses a gantry-style overhead structure that supports the printer. This type of
concrete 3D printer typically operates on a cartesian coordination system consisting of x, y and z axes.
These axes are defined by the rails and beams of the supporting structure. The x-axis corresponds to
the length of the rails that move the printer forwards and backwards, while the y-axis corresponds to
the length of the rail carrying the printhead and connecting the pillars, which in turn are defined by the
z-axis and move up and down.
The typical 3D concrete printing (3DCP) process for the construction industry is shown in Fig.
2. The whole 3D printing process can be described in two ways. Firstly, the software segment (left
side of Fig. 2) and secondly, hardware segment (right side of Fig. 2). At first, a 3D software such as
AutoCAD or Solid Works is used to model the objects, then it is exported to another software for
slicing (define the layer dimension). Thereafter, a program file in the form of G-code is generated for
the whole object for the printer to read and perform the job as shown in Fig. 2. In the hardware
segment, an integrated printer (either gantry or robotic) with material delivery system that is connected
with a pump and hose pipe are required to deliver the material to the nozzle orifice/head, which is
connected at the end part of the hosepipe to deposit the material in layer by layer.
c- Printing tests
After development of the 3D printer for concrete structures, its printing capability and function were
tested focusing on the layering and dispensing of the cementitious materials. Experimental trials were
performed by printing a longitudinal wall design of 30 cm. An important aspect of the test was to find
out material properties and mechanical control by examining the layering condition of cementitious
materials and its hardening process (figure 4 ).
Conclusion
This research developed a mini 3D printer for concrete structures at lab scale size, and its functionality
was tested to find optimal material properties for the 3D printer.
A specified water-concrete-sand mixture was found to be optimal properties of the materials for
extracting and layering the cementitious materials from the 3D printer by the laboratory testing.
The laboratory testing verified that adding rice husk fibers increased the quality of the printing by
preventing shrinkage cracking.
Future development in our 3D concrete printer must focus on preventing collapse of printed mixture
by studding rheology of the product.
References
1-Products: Revolutionizing and Remodeling the Construction Industry. J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 88,
doi:10.3390/jcs3030088.
2- Ferretti, E.; Moretti, M.; Chiusoli, A.; Naldoni, L.; De Fabritiis, F.; Visonà, M. Rice Husk
Shredding as a Means of Increasing the Long-Term Mechanical Properties of Earthen Mixtures for
3D Printing. Materials, submitted.
3- Es-Sebyty, H, Igouzal, M. and Ferretti, E. Stability study of a 3D printed structure, the case of GIA
WASP house in Italy, Archiv. Civ. Mech. Eng, Accepted.
4-Tay, Y.W.D.; Panda, B.; Paul, S.C.; Noor Mohamed, N.A.; Tan, M.J.; Leong, K.F. 3D Printing
Trends in Building and Construction Industry: A Review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2017, 12, 261–
276, doi:10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724.
5-Concrete Wall Fabrication by Contour Crafting. In Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium
on Automation and Robotics in Construction.
6-Paul, S.C.; Tay, Y.W.D.; Panda, B.; Tan, M.J. Fresh and Hardened Properties of 3D Printable
Cementitious Materials for Building and Construction. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2018, 18, 311–319,
doi:10.1016/j.acme.2017.02.008.
7-Panda, B.; Tan, M.J. Rheological Behavior of High Volume Fly Ash Mixtures Containing Micro
Silica for Digital Construction Application. Mater. Lett. 2019, 237, 348–351,
doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.131.
8-Roussel, N. A Thixotropy Model for Fresh Fluid Concretes: Theory, Validation and Applications.
Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 1797–1806, doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.025.