H OM E M E TA A N A LY SIS EFFEC T SIZE C ALC UL ATOR AB O U T T H E P R O J EC T C O N TA C T U S

Back

Download the results as an Excel file

Save the results as pdf

Table.1 summary of studies

Study N1 Mean1 Sd1 N2 Mean2 Sd2 Moderator subgroup Cohen's d CorrectionFactor Hedges'g (SMD) SEg 95%CI-Lower 95%CI-Upper weight(%)-fixed model weight(%)-random model %

1 Studi 1 28 76.930 12.080 28 89.930 12.120 0.0 NAN 1.074379 0.986047 1.059387 0.281904 0.506856 1.611919 6.568852 7.058007

2 Studi 2 30 60.300 13.940 30 69.170 17.130 0.0 NAN 0.567983 0.987013 0.560607 0.259933 0.051137 1.070076 7.726221 7.341021

3 Studi 3 35 25.000 7.840 25 52.000 8.860 0.0 NAN 3.261922 0.987013 3.219560 0.391384 2.452447 3.986673 3.407879 5.697835

4 Studi 4 33 67.300 10.850 33 72.210 9.870 0.0 NAN 0.473409 0.988235 0.467839 0.246671 -0.015636 0.951315 8.579360 7.511005

5 Studi 5 32 77.000 6.610 31 84.000 8.240 0.0 NAN 0.938803 0.987654 0.927213 0.262246 0.413211 1.441215 7.590561 7.311283

6 Studi 6 29 73.200 7.060 32 84.200 9.930 0.0 NAN 1.266260 0.987234 1.250095 0.277263 0.706661 1.793530 6.790606 7.117828

7 Studi 7 41 31.900 13.230 33 49.910 14.810 0.0 NAN 1.290639 0.989547 1.277148 0.254120 0.779074 1.775223 8.083774 7.415670

8 Studi 8 34 69.120 8.690 34 80.240 6.720 0.0 NAN 1.431568 0.988593 1.415238 0.268731 0.888526 1.941951 7.228614 7.227786

9 Studi 9 26 67.950 7.090 23 77.610 7.830 0.0 NAN 1.297420 0.983957 1.276606 0.309777 0.669444 1.883768 5.439930 6.700155

10 Studi 10 31 75.840 4.430 31 80.210 5.690 0.0 NAN 0.857019 0.987448 0.846262 0.262073 0.332599 1.359924 7.600589 7.313509

11 Studi 11 31 78.000 0.795 31 80.130 5.632 0.0 NAN 0.529600 0.987448 0.522952 0.255171 0.022817 1.023087 8.017318 7.402188

12 Studi 12 36 10.870 2.210 36 12.810 1.850 0.0 NAN 0.951930 0.989247 0.941694 0.246019 0.459497 1.423892 8.624871 7.519325

13 Studi 13 28 77.923 8.565 23 84.722 7.543 0.0 NAN 0.837102 0.984615 0.824224 0.288851 0.258076 1.390372 6.256673 6.968522

14 Studi 14 31 77.210 7.950 31 81.230 9.470 0.0 NAN 0.459791 0.987448 0.454020 0.254104 -0.044025 0.952065 8.084753 7.415867
Table.2 Summary of results - fixed and random effect models

Hedges'g (SMD) SEg 95%CI z score p value Heterogeneity

Fixed Effect Model 0.97 0.07 [0.83,1.11] 13.408 0.0 I2=75.8%, Chi2=53.68, df=13

Random Effect Model 1.04 0.148 [0.747,1.326] 7.02 0.0 I2=76.0%, Tau2=0.23

Figure.1 Forestplot - fixed and random effect models

JS chart by amCharts JS chart by amCharts

Studi 1 Studi 1
Studi 2 Studi 2
Studi 3 Studi 3
Studi 4 Studi 4
Studi 5 Studi 5
Studi 6 Studi 6
Studi 7 Studi 7
Studi 8 Studi 8
Studi 9 Studi 9
Studi 10 Studi 10
Studi 11 Studi 11
Studi 12 Studi 12
Studi 13 Studi 13
Studi 14 Studi 14
g(ave) fixed model g(ave) random model

-2 0 2 4 6 -2 0 2 4 6
Figure.2 Funnel Plot - fixed and random effect models

Funnel Plot random model (Y: Standard Error (SEg) - X: Effect Size (g))

1.4 Hedges' g

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6
 Funnel Plot fixed model (Y: Standard Error (SEg) - X: Effect Size (g))

1.4 Hedges' g

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6

Table.3 Fail-N Safe

Bias of the analysis regarding the file-drawer problem:

Fail-N Safe, the number of studies (or samples) with a null effect (g = 0)
needed to bring the calculated significance level of the pooled effect (p value < 0.0001) near the critical significance level (p value = 0.05),
is calculated as follows:
References:
* Rosenberg, M. S. (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59(2), 464-468.
* Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological bulletin, 86(3), 638.

Rosenthal (1979) Rosenberg (2005)

tc(α = 0.05, df = 14) = 1.761 Zc(α = 0.05) = 1.645

Fail-N Safe 994.55 797.33

Table.4 Results of Meta regression

OLS Regression Results

Dep. Variable: y R-squared: 0.000

Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.000

Method: Least Squares F-statistic: nan

Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 Prob (F-statistic): nan

Time: 04:25:40 Log-Likelihood: -14.282

No. Observations: 14 AIC: 30.56

Df Residuals: 13 BIC: 31.20

Df Model: 0

Covariance Type: nonrobust

coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]

const 1.0745 0.186 5.773 0.000 0.672 1.477

Moderator 0 0 nan nan 0 0

Omnibus: 22.438 Durbin-Watson: 2.515

Prob(Omnibus): 0.000 Jarque-Bera (JB): 23.321

Skew: 2.158 Prob(JB): 8.63e-06

Kurtosis: 7.620 Cond. No. inf

Warnings:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
[2] The smallest eigenvalue is 0. This might indicate that there are
strong multicollinearity problems or that the design matrix is singular.
strong multicollinearity problems or that the design matrix is singular.

Table.5 Results of Subgroup Analysis - fixed and random effect models

fixed model

subgroup analysis

0 Oops! There should be at least 2 subgroups for running this analysis!

random model

subgroup analysis

0 Oops! There should be at least 2 subgroups for running this analysis!

Results of ANOVA for subgroups

F value = 0, p value = 0

Figure.3 Intervals of effect sizes for subgroups - fixed and random effect models
fixed model

random model
Dear Researcher,

Meta-Mar wishes to thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you.
Please help us serve you better by taking a couple of minutes to tell us about the service you have received so far. We value your research and want to make sure we
meet your expectations.

Thank you for your time.

Take the survey!

CO PYRIG HT © META -MA R V2. 7. 0