You are on page 1of 2

Talangan Integrated National High School

Talangan Nagcarlan, Laguna

IMPROVISE WATER ALARM AS AN EARTHQUAKE DETECTOR


I. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Name (Optional): Date:
Address: Classification: Student Teacher

School DRRM Coordinator Community


II. DIRECTION: Using the rating scale below, assess the efficiency and acceptability of improvised
water alarm as an earthquake detector by checking the column which corresponds to the statement.

Scale/ Audible Acceptability


Accuracy Timeliness Efficiently
Indicators alarm level
4 Very Accurate Alam Can be heard Very Efficient Highly
instantly 0-2 in 1-2 Acceptable
seconds classrooms
3 Accurate Alarm after 3- Can be heard Efficient Acceptable
5 second2 in 1 room
2 Moderately Alarm after 5 Cannot be Moderately Moderately
Accurate seconds heard all Efficient Acceptable
throughout the
classroom
1 Not Accurate Did not alarm No Alarm Not Efficient Not
Acceptable

STATEMENT IMPROVISED WATER


ALARM AS AN
EARTHQUAKE
DETECTOR
Accuracy 4 3 2 1
1. It can accurately sense the earthquake.
2. The product’s function is accurately working.
3. The alarm is working accurately.
Timeliness
1. The alarm is working base on the vibration of an earthquake.
2. This water alarm can effectively sense the earthquake.
3. It exactly alarms after sensing an earthquake.
Audible Alarm
1. The alarm can be widely heard.
2. The sound or noise of the alarm is loud enough.
3. It can alarm when the sensor is touch by the water.
Efficiently
1. This detector is efficient when an earthquake happens.
2. The product can be use by anyone.
3. It can be attached anywhere in the classroom.
Acceptability Level
1. The product is acceptable as an earthquake detector.
2. It can work as an improvised water alarm earthquake detector.
3. The product is working properly base on the product’s
purpose.

You might also like