Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Infant
Carol Jean Potter, MD
KEYWORDS
Cholestasis Liver dysfunction Bile acid transport Premature Neonatal
KEY POINTS
The premature liver reacts differently than that of the term infant.
Comorbidities strongly influence liver function in the preterm infant.
Imaging is very important in evaluation of the preterm infant.
As advances in medical care have allowed survival of more fragile babies, those cared
for in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are smaller in size, more complicated, and
more immature. Prematurity not only impairs liver function, but also impairs its ability
to respond to the many insults suffered by infants who require care in the NICU. It is
often difficult to determine what is primary liver disease and what is a consequence of
secondary insults such as sepsis, hypoxia, ischemia, medications, or just the milieu of
the premature infant. Diagnostic tools are also limited by blood volume and the baby’s
ability to tolerate the testing. This article discusses how prematurity affects the liver,
how it responds to secondary insults, and sets out approaches to evaluation.
RECENT ADVANCES
Recent advances in hepatology have more clearly defined the process of bile synthe-
sis and flow, including the complex regulation of this process.1–3 Mechanisms for
downregulation by cofactors such as sepsis have been identified.4,5 At the same
time, diagnostic panels with rapid turnaround have been developed that allow testing
for genetic variants in liver metabolism and other genetic liver diseases in a time frame
that is clinically relevant. This advance has expanded our understanding of the pheno-
type for variations and their impact on cholestasis in the neonate.3,6–14 The population
being evaluated for liver disease in the NICU has changed dramatically. Babies who
are smaller in size, lower in gestational age, and with more complex medical and
Nationwide Children’s Hospital, The Ohio State University, 700 Childrens Drive, Columbus, OH
43205, USA
E-mail address: Carol.potter@nationwidechildrens.org
Abbreviations
BSEP Bile salt export pump
CMV Cytomegalovirus
GGT Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase
GLAD Gestational alloimmune liver disease
NICU Neonatal intensive care unit
PN Parenteral nutrition
T4/TSH Thyroxine/thyroid-stimulating hormone
UTI Urinary tract infection
surgical problems are surviving. Although we know that not all the bile ducts are
formed until after term and that there is developmental regulation of many of the syn-
thesis and transport enzymes of the liver, our understanding is crude.15–17 At the same
time, advances in the management of parenteral nutrition (PN) have allowed us to
recognize liver disease previously thought to be from PN or obscured by the changes
in the liver of those on PN. All these factors work together to form the clinical picture
we see in the premature infant with liver dysfunction.
Prematurity has a profound impact on the liver’s ability to synthesize and regulate
bile acids.15 Bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver in a multistep pro-
cess. Owing to the immaturity of some steps, the preterm infant makes a smaller
quantity of bile acids and the fetus produces some bile acids that are inherently chole-
static and found in much smaller quantities later in life.17 This factor may add to the
cholestasis seen in premature infants. Bile acid synthesis greatly increases in the
neonatal period.18–21 Once made, bile acids are transported out of the liver and into
the duct. They are modified by a series of enzymes. Most of these processes are
now well-characterized, with identification of mutations that cause disease. These
mutations are tested for in genetic cholestasis panels.6,8–14
In a separate pathway, bilirubin is transported into the duct and carried to the gut by
the bile. The rate-limiting step is the transport of conjugated bilirubin from the hepato-
cyte into the duct. Neonates have a large heme load to process. If the enzyme is over-
whelmed, conjugated bilirubin will back diffuse into the plasma.4,16
Fig. 1 demonstrates bile acid synthesis in the liver under the control of FXR. Bile
acids are transported into the duct by the bile salt export pump (BSEP), with regulatory
help from FIC1 and MDR3. The bile acids are recycled from the circulation to start the
Fig. 1. Demonstrating bile acid synthesis in the liver under the control of FXR.
process again. In a separate pathway, heme is broken down into bilirubin, taken up by
the hepatocyte, and transported into the bile by MDR2.
Testing for genetic mutations is now done with large panels rather than testing for a
single disease. This strategy decreases cost, improves testing time, and limits the
amount of blood needed for testing. As more babies are tested, we are finding
expanded phenotypes of mutations. Sequencing in a large cohort of patients with mu-
tations in bile acid transporters including FIC1, BSEP, and MDR3 showed a large num-
ber of patients who had previously unrecognized novel mutations as well as mutations
that had been previously thought to be normal variants, which can cause disease.11,12
A diagnosis of a genetic cause of cholestasis is more likely in infants presenting with
either low gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) (suggesting bile acid transport or
synthesis problems) or high GGT (suggesting poor bile flow with elevated bile acids
in the duct). In studies of post-term infants, there is a greater than 50% chance of
finding a genetic diagnosis with this phenotype. In babies without such a phenotype
(neonatal cholestasis, prematurity, and PN-associated cholestasis), there remains a
15% chance of diagnosis with genetic panels. Researchers also postulate that other
genes modify the effects of these major disease-causing mutations and may add to
pathogenesis.11 There is a growing literature about cholestatic babies with single mu-
tations in more than 1 gene and the possible significance thereof. Multiple mutations in
genes that contribute to cholestasis are more common in cholestatic babies than in
control babies.11,13,22 This finding may be particularly true in the premature infant
with lower baseline levels of bile acid transporters. We are slowly developing an under-
standing of the interactions of genes, but presently can only infer the results of inter-
action by knowing the mechanism of each gene.
Additionally, we know that the clinical situation greatly influences cholestasis. For
example, women with cholestasis of pregnancy or contraceptive-induced cholestasis
recover once the hormonal downregulation of their transporters is removed.23 As
noted elsewhere in this article, premature infants have very low level of transporters
because of immaturity. We currently cannot predict what genetic changes will predis-
pose to cholestasis during this period of developmental downregulation of
transporters.
CURRENT CONTROVERSIES
One of the most difficult questions for the hepatologist in the NICU is what constitutes
an appropriate evaluation. None of the pathways for the evaluation of neonatal chole-
stasis that exist in the literature were developed for the preterm infant.24,25 As noted,
most of the enzymes involved in bile synthesis and transport have a developmental
ontogeny and are present in low levels in the preterm infant. The understanding of
this ontogeny and its clinical implications are somewhat crude. This factor makes it
more difficult to discriminate primary liver disease from the interaction of prematurity
with secondary insults. Unlike a term 2-month-old infant presenting with cholestasis
as an outpatient, these premature babies frequently have comorbidities that influence
cholestasis. In addition to these considerations, the evaluation must also take into ac-
count the limited blood volume of these babies and the difficulty and stress involved in
obtaining specimens.
The first step is a detailed history. Pertinent historical data includes
Mother’s prior pregnancies and outcomes
Gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD) usually does not occur in the first
pregnancy and becomes more severe with each subsequent pregnancy.
Prenatal deaths may be associated with genetic causes.
Family history
Prolonged neonatal cholestasis in a parent signals genetic disease such as
alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency or a bile acid transport defect.
Prenatal or early neonatal deaths may be associated with genetic disease.
A genetic diagnosis may have not been suspected in the baby. For instance,
the diagnosis of Alagille syndrome is more likely when a prior baby died of pul-
monary atresia. Similarly a diagnosis of a bile acid synthesis defect would
explain a sibling death from intracranial bleeding.
Prenatal history
Intrauterine growth retardations can cause a paucity of bile ducts.
Prenatal growth can signal genetic problems.
Cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with bile acid transport defects.23,26
HELLP syndrome is associated with fatty oxidation defects.
A detailed prenatal history is usually available.
Gestational age at delivery
The lower the gestational age, the fewer bile ducts, fewer transport enzymes, a
smaller bile acid pool and more cholestatic bile acids there are.15,17
Newborn screen
Understand what your state screens for. These results may be able to be
expedited.
Fructose and galactose exposure
Galactose should not be given to a baby with liver disease until the newborn
screen results are known. Fructose is in most oral medications and the sugar
pacifiers are dipped in the help soothe the infant. It is also added to many for-
mulas. Fructose may need to be withdrawn if its introduction preceded the liver
dysfunction.
Thyroxine/thyroid-stimulating hormone (T4/TSH)
The newborn screen may be TSH based and miss central hypothyroidism. Pre-
mature infants are at higher risk for thyroid dysfunction.
Thyroid Dysfunction
- Congenital hypothyroidism and congenital hypopituitarism are both causes
Genetics
Syndromes, such as trisomy 21, may be associated with cholestasis. Ductal
plate malformations may result in renal and liver disease.
Urinary tract infection (UTI)
A UTI can downregulate the transport of bilirubin, causing elevated direct bilirubin
without liver dysfunction. Also, a UTI may cause downregulation of bile acid up-
take by the hepatocyte, downregulation of transport out of the hepatocyte, and
thus retention of bile acids in the hepatocyte leading to liver toxicity.4,26,34
Sepsis
Similar mechanisms to UTI but more severe.
Infections impact the liver of preterm infants. Endotoxin suppresses MDR2, the
transporter of conjugated bilirubin from the hepatocyte to the bile duct. Urinary
infections are not uncommon in the NICU and may be asymptomatic and not
associated with renal malformations. An Escherichia coli UTI may present with
elevated direct bilirubin without other signs of liver dysfunction. Sepsis or
translocation of bacteria from the gut to the liver though the portal vein during
necrotizing enterocolitis may suppress not only MDR2, but also the suppress
the uptake of bile acids from the serum into the liver and suppress the transport
of bile acids out of the liver via BSEP suppression, leading to bile acid toxicity
in the hepatocyte.4,5 Viral infections such as CMV, enterovirus, and adenovirus
may cause significant viral hepatitis and liver dysfunction.
Timing of liver dysfunction
Liver disease immediately after birth is more likely to be primary and genetic.
Liver dysfunction occurring latter should be evaluated for secondary causes in
addition to primary liver disease.
The timing of presentation is often hard to determine, because liver evaluation
is often not done.
Most cholestasis in the NICU eventually resolves with variable amount of sequela. It
can be difficult to distinguish who will do well at the time of presentation. Genetics
probably plays a role in this. Genetic studies enable us to make a diagnosis when
the phenotype is not fully developed, is unusual, or complicated by other comorbid-
ities. The role of heterozygote mutations, gene modifiers, the interplay between muta-
tions in multiple genes, and minor mutations at a time of stress and low levels of
enzymes, is just beginning to be understood.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Table 1
Table of critical presentations and associated pathophysiologic relevance
Table 2
Table of actions to consider for appropriate therapies to normalize liver functions
Table 3
Causes of liver dysfunction and potential therapies
Cause Therapy
GALD Exchange transfusion and IgG infusion,
transplantation
Viral (especially herpes) Antivirals
Hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy/shock Supportive care
Tyrosinemia 2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl-1,3-
cyclohexanedione
Biliary atresia Surgical
Bile acid synthesis defects Cholic acid
Amino acids, organic acids, urea cycle Metabolic therapy, dialysis
Mitochondrial supportive
Shunt supportive
makes secondary insults such as infection more impactful on the liver than
they would be in an older child. Minor mutations in the transport of bile acids
may become symptomatic because of developmental decrease at baseline.
Bilirubin metabolism is also immature at a time when the baby has a very large
heme load to process. The rate-limiting step is MDR2 transport of conjugated
bilirubin out of the hepatocyte and into the duct. Because the preterm infant
has low levels of MDR2 some of the conjugated bilirubin will back diffuse
from the hepatocyte and into the plasma, as discussed elsewhere in this
article. Once the bilirubin is in the duct, it is carried to the gut by bile, which
has a low flow rate compared with older infants.17 The more premature the
baby is, the more pronounced these issues are.
6. Are there nutritional implications of the cholestasis the need to be addressed?
Babies with cholestasis have low luminal bile acids leading to difficulty with fat
absorption. They may need supplementation of medium chain triglycerides
(MCT), which can be absorbed without bile. This supplement can be added
to breast milk or breast milk can be concentrated with a high MCT formula.
If breast milk is not being, used a high MCT formula can be chosen. Even
with high MCT, these babies may require more calories per kilogram than ex-
pected to grow appropriately. They may also require fat-soluble vitamin sup-
plementation. It is important to remember that they may remain cholestatic
and require these interventions even after the bilirubin returns to normal.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Box 1
Considerations more common in premature than the term infant
Prenatal insults
Viral
Genetic
Placental
Maternal disease
Delivery complications
Large heme loads
Nonhepatic infections
Vascular malformations
Comorbidities
SUMMARY
Current pathways for the evaluation of the cholestatic infant are for the term infant who
is past the perinatal period. Although all the diseases considered can and do occur in
premature infants, other considerations must be included. This article can be used as
a guide to the evaluation but unless an answer is readily evident, early involvement of
an experienced hepatologist is warranted (Box 1).
Although each baby is unique, Box 2 provides a good starting evaluation for the
well-appearing premature infant with liver dysfunction.
It is often difficult to tell if the sick premature infant with liver dysfunction has primary
liver disease or systemic disease that is effecting the liver. Thus, evaluation must look
for both. Box 3 provides useful studies, which should be tailored to the situation.
The evaluation of the premature infant with liver disease is very complex and has
many components. Each infant is different. A systematic approach should include a
careful history; evaluation of comorbidities; consideration of gestationally appropriate
liver pathophysiology; consideration of genetic etiologies; an understanding of liver
dysfunction; collaboration with neonatologists, radiologists, surgeons, hepatologists,
pathologists, and other subspecialists; and prioritization of studies based on medical
urgency.
Box 2
Well-appearing premature infant
Box 3
Sick premature evaluation
Liver evaluation Systemic evaluation
Coagulation studies Head ultrasound examination
Aspartate aminotransferase, alanine Heart echocardiography
aminotransferase, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, Necrotizing enterocolitis evaluation
fractionated bilirubin Hypoxia/shock
Genetic studies Urine and blood cultures,
Lactate, glucose cerebrospinal fluid indicated
Amino acids, organic acids Complete blood count
Newborn Screen Acid–base studies
Acyl carnitine profile Pituitary evaluation
Galactose/fructose history
Viral and bacterial studies
Ultrasound examination with Doppler
Ferritin
DISCLOSURE
REFERENCES
11. Chen HL, Li HY, Wu JF, et al. Panel-based next-generation sequencing for the
diagnosis of cholestatic genetic liver diseases: clinical utility and challenges.
J Pediatr 2019;205:153–9.e6.
12. Droge C, Bonus M, Baumann U, et al. Sequencing of FIC1, BSEP and MDR3 in a
large cohort of patients with cholestasis revealed a high number of different ge-
netic variants. J Hepatol 2017;67(6):1253–64.
13. Henkel SA, Squires JH, Ayers M, et al. Expanding etiology of progressive familial
intrahepatic cholestasis. World J Hepatol 2019;11(5):450–63.
14. Khan HH, Mew NA, Kaufman SS, et al. Unusual cystic fibrosis transmembrane
conductance regulator mutations and liver disease: a case series and review
of the literature. Transplant Proc 2019;51(3):790–3.
15. Chen HL, Chen HL, Liu YJ, et al. Developmental expression of canalicular trans-
porter genes in human liver. J Hepatol 2005;43(3):472–7.
16. Tomer G, Ananthanarayanan M, Weymann A, et al. Differential developmental
regulation of rat liver canalicular membrane transporters Bsep and Mrp2. Pediatr
Res 2003;53(2):288–94.
17. Heubi JE. Bile acid metabolism. In: Gluckman PD, Heymann MA, editors. Pediat-
rics and perinatology. 2nd edition. London: Arnold; 1996. p. 663–8.
18. Heubi JE, Balistreri WF, Suchy FJ. Bile salt metabolism in the first year of life.
J Lab Clin Med 1982;100(1):127–36.
19. Watkins JB, Szczepanik P, Gould JB, et al. Bile salt metabolism in the human pre-
mature infant. Preliminary observations of pool size and synthesis rate following
prenatal administration of dexamethasone and phenobarbital. Gastroenterology
1975;69(3):706–13.
20. Watkins JB, Ingall D, Szczepanik P, et al. Bile-salt metabolism in the newborn.
Measurement of pool size and synthesis by stable isotope technic. N Engl J
Med 1973;288(9):431–4.
21. Gao B, St Pierre MV, Stieger B, et al. Differential expression of bile salt and
organic anion transporters in developing rat liver. J Hepatol 2004;41(2):201–8.
22. Goldschmidt ML, Mourya R, Connor J, et al. Increased frequency of double and
triple heterozygous gene variants in children with intrahepatic cholestasis. Hep-
atol Res 2016;46(4):306–11.
23. Yeap SP, Harley H, Thompson R, et al. Biliary transporter gene mutations in se-
vere intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: diagnostic and management implica-
tions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;34(2):425–35.
24. Dani C, Pratesi S, Raimondi F, et al, Task Force for Hyperbilirubinemia of the Ital-
ian Society of Neonatology. Italian guidelines for the management and treatment
of neonatal cholestasis. Ital J Pediatr 2015;41:69.
25. Fawaz R, Baumann U, Ekong U, et al. Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic
jaundice in infants: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pe-
diatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol
Nutr 2017;64(1):154–68.
26. Kubitz R, Droge C, Stindt J, et al. The bile salt export pump (BSEP) in health and
disease. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2012;36(6):536–53.
27. Grammatikopoulos T, Deheragoda M, Strautnieks S, et al. Reduced hepatocellu-
lar expression of canalicular transport proteins in infants with neonatal cholestasis
and congenital hypopituitarism. J Pediatr 2018;200:181–7.
28. Schmaltz C. Thyroid hormones in the neonate: an overview of physiology and
clinical correlation. Adv Neonatal Care 2012;12(4):217–22.
29. Uchiyama A, Watanabe H, Nakanishi H, et al. Small for gestational age is a risk
factor for the development of delayed thyrotropin elevation in infants weighing
less than 2000 g. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018;89(4):431–6.
30. Lanzieri TM, Dollard SC, Josephson CD, et al. Breast milk-acquired cytomegalo-
virus infection and disease in VLBW and premature infants. Pediatrics 2013;
131(6):e1937–45.
31. Blanc T, Guerin F, Franchi-Abella S, et al. Congenital portosystemic shunts in chil-
dren: a new anatomical classification correlated with surgical strategy. Ann Surg
2014;260(1):188–98.
32. Gupta P, Sinha A, Sodhi KS, et al. Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts:
spectrum of findings on ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic reso-
nance imaging. Radiol Res Pract 2015;2015:181958.
33. Bernard O, Franchi-Abella S, Branchereau S, et al. Congenital portosystemic
shunts in children: recognition, evaluation, and management. Semin Liver Dis
2012;32(4):273–87.
34. Ruangkit C, Satpute A, Vogt BA, et al. Incidence and risk factors of urinary tract
infection in very low birth weight infants. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2016;9(1):
83–90.
35. Kim DB, Lim G, Oh KW. Determination of reference range of gamma glutamyl
transferase in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
2017;30(6):670–2.
36. Wang JS, Tan N, Dhawan A. Significance of low or normal serum gamma glutamyl
transferase level in infants with idiopathic neonatal hepatitis. Eur J Pediatr 2006;
165(11):795–801.
37. Barseghyan K, Ramanathan R, Chavez T, et al. Utility of hepatobiliary scintig-
raphy in diagnosing or excluding biliary atresia in premature neonates and full-
term infants with conjugated hyperbilirubinemia who received parenteral nutri-
tion. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31(24):3249–54.