Professional Documents
Culture Documents
17) at Km. 91+000 God River, Km. 94+400 Kal River, and Km. 161+400 Choradi River in Raigad
District in the State of Maharashtra on EPC Mode.
ABBREVIATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................1
1.1 General................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Objective..............................................................................................................................1
1.3 Need for Guidelines on Quality Systems..............................................................................2
1.4 Need for Quality Control.....................................................................................................2
1.5 Pre-requisites for Quality Control........................................................................................2
1.6 Types of Quality Control......................................................................................................3
1.7 Quality Assurance and Quality Assurance Manual.............................................................3
2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................4
3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................18
3.2 Outline of Quality Plan......................................................................................................18
3.3 Distribution of Quality Manual.........................................................................................19
4.0 PROJECT ORGANISATION.....................................................................................................................22
4.1 General..............................................................................................................................22
4.2 Inter-relationship...............................................................................................................22
4.3 Engineers Organization.....................................................................................................22
4.4 Task Assignment................................................................................................................24
4.4.1 Monitor Site Establishment.......................................................................................24
4.5 Job Descriptions................................................................................................................24
4.5.1 Site Engineers (Structures / Highways).....................................................................25
4.5.2 Senior Engineers (Structures / Highways)................................................................26
4.5.3 Material Engineer.....................................................................................................28
4.5.4 The Project Manager (PM).......................................................................................29
5.0 CONTROL OF DATA AND DOCUMENTATION..................................................................................30
15.1 General..............................................................................................................................83
15.2 Works other than Concrete................................................................................................83
15.2.1 Procedures.................................................................................................................83
15.2.2 Records......................................................................................................................83
15.2.3 Analysis......................................................................................................................84
15.3 Concrete Works..................................................................................................................84
15.3.1 Non-Compliance Other Than Strength or Finish......................................................84
15.3.2 Non-Compliance with Strength Requirements..........................................................84
15.3.3 Non-Compliance with Finish Requirements..............................................................85
16.0 QUALITY AUDIT........................................................................................................................................86
16.1 Programme........................................................................................................................86
16.2 Quality Audit Report..........................................................................................................86
17.0 PROFORMAE OF QUALITY RECORDS...............................................................................................87
v
Construction of Major High – Level Bridges across Panvel – Mahad – Panjim Road NH-66 (Old-NH-
17) at Km. 91+000 God River, Km. 94+400 Kal River, and Km. 161+400 Choradi River in Raigad
District in the State of Maharashtra on EPC Mode.
LIST OF TABLE
vi
Construction of Major High – Level Bridges across Panvel – Mahad – Panjim Road NH-66 (Old-NH-
17) at Km. 91+000 God River, Km. 94+400 Kal River, and Km. 161+400 Choradi River in Raigad
District in the State of Maharashtra on EPC Mode.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
The last decade, the construction technology has developed rapidly especially in the field of Roads
and Highways. High performance modem machinery and new technology materials have enabled
construction industry to carryout works with great speed and precision. Keeping in pace with this
development the quality control procedures have evolved which are essential to monitor, test and
check the works so that the works are executed as per the contract specifications. The design and
construction operations of many activities require proper coordination and checking, and fool
proof documentation and auditing.
The Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) is for “Construction of Major High – Level Bridges across
Panvel – Mahad – Panjim Road NH-66 (Old-NH-17) at Km. 91+000 God River, Km. 94+400 Kal
River, and Km. 161+400 Choradi River in Raigad District in the State of Maharashtra on EPC
Mode.” is essentially intended to assist the project team to carry out the various project related
activities in conformity with the contractual and technical requirements as per IRC Standards,
MoR&TH Specifications and the Terms of Reference (TOR) as given in the Contract Agreement.
The overall aim of the QAP is to eliminate errors rather than detect errors so that deliverables are
of required quality and can be submitted within the agreed time frame. The QAP is in
conformation with quality standards and the declared quality policy of “Shinde Developers Pvt
Ltd”. All the activities of the project to be carried out shall be based on the quality assurance
system / procedures set out on the basis of the IRC Standards, BIS Specifications, MoRTH
Specifications and Circulars, sound engineering practices and as approved by the Public Works
Department – NH Division.
1.2 Objective
The project of Construction of Major High – Level Bridges across Panvel – Mahad – Panjim Road
NH-66 (Old-NH-17) at Km. 91+000 God River, Km. 94+400 Kal River, and Km. 161+400
Choradi River in Raigad District in the State of Maharashtra consists of providing Flexable
payment main carriage way, Paved shoulders, Major Bridges provisions as per agreed contract.
The objective of this quality manual is to execute this project with high quality materials and
workmanship as prescribed in the contract Technical Specifications and various relevant
publications of Indian Standard Code of Practices and Indian Roads Congress. This document will
help the site staff responsible for construction supervision to ensure that the contract
specifications and various test procedures prescribed for each and every item of work are carried
out at the prescribed frequency and compared with the acceptable limits / results specified. This
will ensure a high degree of workmanship for the project since quality of work is of paramount
importance for this project. It may be stressed here that the quality of work should not be
sacrificed for the sake of speedier completion of work. It is essential that all the materials used in
the work should be of superior quality conforming to the contract specifications and the degree of
workmanship should be of high order so that the end product is more durable and maintenance
free.
Consistent and comprehensive methods of checking and approval of works are achieved by
establishing step by step procedures. These procedures reduce human errors, omission and
difference of approach between individuals. The day-to-day supervision and quality control of
materials and works would be carried out by the Consultants as per Quality Assurance Manual in
conjunction with Contract Documents and under the guide lines of Authority engineer and
Client’s technicians in this regard to ensure the quality of works conforming to standards and
specifications.
In order to achieve the aim of building safe, serviceable, durable and economic highways and
bridges, roads and bridge structures should meet certain requirements. The characteristics that a
structure should possess to fulfill these requirements have to be specified. The codes of practice
and the contract documents strive to achieve this by way of defining design criteria, practical
rules, technical specifications, testing and acceptance criteria and workmanship. All these
strategies implicitly depend upon human skills for their successful and reliable application, which,
eventually, determines the quality and performance of highways/bridges. The basic desire to
produce quality work is essential in the minds of all those connected with highways and bridges
projects.
In order to achieve the required level of quality of the final product, as specified by engineering
schemes, it is necessary to have a strategy for management of human skills by way of Quality
System defining quality policy, quality assurance plan and quality audit. Apart from this, it is also
necessary to explicitly define Quality itself, which is expected to be achieved through the Quality
System. These guidelines have, therefore, been evolved to facilitate preparation of appropriate
Quality System for the project of Construction of Major High – Level Bridges across Panvel –
Mahad – Panjim Road NH-66 (Old-NH-17) at Km. 91+000 God River, Km. 94+400 Kal River, and
Km. 161+400 Choradi River in Raigad District in the State of Maharashtra on EPC Mode Use and
application of these guidelines will inculcate, in all those involved in building this activity, an
ability to provide the product or services expected of them consistently, thereby, assuring the
users and instilling confidence in the users.
Quality control is an important requirement for highway and bridge construction for ensuring
quality and for creating durable national assets. The need for quality control on these
constructions has increased considerably in recent times due to a significant increase in traffic
intensities, and the level of service expected of highway facilities. Improved level of service of the
highways will result in considerable savings in vehicle operating cost and in favorable road user
reaction and public opinion. Quality control in the form of sensory checks which are intrinsically
subjective and qualitative are grossly inadequate for present-day needs and must instead be based
on proper objective and quantitative measurements.
The pre-requisites for effective control of highway and bridge constructions are:
Construction specifications and estimates should provide for effective quality control
Adequately trained staff and equipped agency for exercising quality control should be set up.
Periodic appraisal of the quality control data should be made not only for implementation
during construction but also for effecting possible improvements in quality control and
construction techniques themselves. Updating of knowledge by on job training.
Over the years, two types of methods have emerged for exercising quality control during the
construction of works. One is generally known as Process control and the other as End result type
of control. In the former, the designer makes the decisions regarding the type of equipment, the
procedure of construction and the amount of work required to obtain the desired result. In the End
result' type of control, the construction agency, which may be a private Contractor, has a free hand
in the selection of construction methods and equipment to achieve the desired end product.
The choice of either type of control is largely a matter of judgment, depending on the magnitude
of the job, different environmental factors involved, and the available facilities. In India, gradually
the trend is towards End result type of working on highway pavement and embankment
construction jobs. But in several situations, for example on small jobs, or where input type of tests
like material gradation and purity of lime are to be carried out, expediency would be in adopting
Process type of control. Because of circumstances, a combination of the Process and End result
types of control will continue to be adopted in India, depending on the nature and size of the job.
In the End result type of specification, the field engineering personnel carry out tests on finished
work at regular intervals to evaluate whether it meets the specification requirements or not. On the
other hand, in Process type control, the responsibility of field personnel is to make sure that the
work in its different phases is executed in the manner predetermined and laid down in
specifications.
Quality Assurance (QA) is defined as all the planned and systematic activities implemented
within the Quality System and demonstrated as needed, to provide adequate confidence that an
entity will fulfill the requirements. A Quality Assurance Manual (QAM) provides a base
document outlining policy, procedures, responsibilities, compliance, acceptance criteria and
documentation. It should be prepared and accepted by all parties concerned before start of project.
Depending upon the levels of checking/cross-checking and controls, required to provide adequate
confidence, four classes of quality assurance are mentioned below.
Since the degree of requirement of confidence for bridge construction is very high, nominal QA
i.e. Class Q-1 is not permitted in bridge construction. Thus there will be only three classes of QA
for bridge construction, namely Q-2, Q-3 and Q-4.
Prior to project preparation stage, one of the four classes for the highway projects and one of the
three classes for road bridges for QA should be chosen. This classification should be reviewed
depending on site specific problems and types of solutions involved. As the project is upgradation
of the important National Highway No.17, QA Class chosen for the road and bridges is class
‘High QA-Q-3’.
Specifications for Road and Bridge works published in 2013 (Fifth Revision) by IRC for Ministry
of Road Transport & Highways and other related Indian Road Congress publications by way of
abstracting essential requirements of construction of various items of work.
2.4 Quality Assurance requirement for the above chosen class is given below under the
following heads
A) Road Works
B) Bridge Works
A. Road Works
4 Construction Organizations
4.1 Organization of Contractors execution staff responsible for
- Other physical tests At the beginning for mix design, and every
(crushing value, abrasion, change of source/codal stipulations
flakiness index, stripping,
moisture, etc.
Normal physical tests Test in the beginning and for every change in
Chemical tests source additional to manufacturers test.
5.8 Road Marking Normal Paints Apart from Manufacturer’s test certificates test
Physical tests. independently and additionally test random
batches.
5.9 Road Signs Manufacturer’s test certificates additional witness
test at Manufacturer’s works.
6 Workmanship
6.1 General - controls direct and
indirect
a) Working and supervision Skilled workers having special training to be
insisted
Full time supervision from Contractor and
Consultant.
Periodic check by designer with predetermined
frequency
Documentation of inspection and certification of
compliance by designer’s representative
Workmanship
a) Paving Sensor paver mandatory
b) Compaction Vibratory equipment mandatory
c) Geometry checks All layers
6.8 Wearing Coarse -
Asphalt/Concrete
a) Material/Aggregates Crushed/Screened aggregates mandatory
b) Mixing Plant mixing mandatory
c) Paving Sensor Paver mandatory
d) Compaction Vibratory equipment mandatory
e) Geometry checks All layers
B. Bridge Works
4 Construction Organizations
4.1 Organization of Contractor Contractors execution staff responsible for both
supervision and surveillance of quality, with
external agency/owner for audit of quality plan
and its operation. With separately set up QA
group for operation of quality plan.
4.2 Project Management Supervision Consultant should have specially set-
Consultant (Supervision up QA group for operation of quality plan.
Consultant)
4.3 Planning of Construction Broad planning made by Contractor and got
activities approved form owner/Supervision Consultant
with construction activities planned in details
including material planning, sequencing of work,
5 Materials
5.1 General
a) Materials from Natural Small or medium scale purchases from large &
Sources established suppliers/traders. Also bulk purchase
from source.
Sources mutually agreed to between Contractor
and owners' project teams and documented.
Authority Engineer testing/acceptance by
Contractors & owner’s Q.A. teams and
documented.
Testing/acceptance at the start of the project as
well as at specified frequency.
b) Factory manufactured
items including cement, steel Manufacturer's test certificates with sample
bearings, expansion joints etc. checks for initial acceptance only.
Regular testing at specified sampling frequency
during construction.
Set up mutually agreed Q.A. methods at two
levels for inspection/testing to cover the specific
purchase order.
ISO:9000 certificate not essential for
manufactured items. In case the manufacturer has
ISO:9000 certification, he may be given
preference.
c) Records for all materials Record of sources and purchase dates for all
items. For manufactured items record of
manufacturers' test certificate. Also record of
- Other Physical tests At the beginning for mix design and for every
(crushing value abrasion change of source.
moisture contents etc.)
- Deleterious Contents Mandatory for selection of source and whenever
there is change in source of supply.
- Aggregate Reactivity Mandatory for selection of source and whenever
there is change in source of supply.
Other Physical Tests At the beginning for mix design and for every
(crushing value, abrasion, change of source.
moisture contents etc.)
a) General (for all items of In a sealed and moisture proof go down with
prestressing including minimum openings store, above ground level on
equipment). raised supports or in racks.
b) HT Wires/Strands
- Mechanical Properties In addition to manufacturer's certificate, tests done
(Tensile Strength, Proof on random samples for a lot of 50 tonne, or part
Stress). thereof and witnessed by Authority Engineer QA
team at random.
6 Workmanship
6.1 General (Direct & Indirect)
a) Working and Supervision. Skilled workers having special training and
working under experienced supervisors. (Where
trade qualifications exist should be insisted upon).
Full time supervision from Contractor as well as
from owner or his agent.
Periodic check by designer during site visit and
also at predetermined stages and frequency.
Documented inspection and certification of
compliance by designer’s representative.
Check of friction and wobble In-situ check on losses by stressing from one side
losses jack using as active jack and other as a passive
jack on a sample basis.
(For long cables and high total deviation, the
passive jack may not register pressures within
stroke length of active jack. For such cases special
tests or provision of shorts cables may be
required.)
6.8 Grout & Grouting
a) Grouting of Prestressing At the beginning of work for designing suitable
Cable grouts.
- Composition and Physical Physical properties to be verified once in a week
Properties or with change of batch of cement or admixture.
Quality planning to assure quality of product has been adopted over the last few decades for
special and complex projects. However, in case of highway engineering and construction, efforts
in this regard are visible only in the recent years. As a result of continuing efforts, it has become
possible to evolve appropriate methods and level of documentation for Quality Assurance plan for
highway projects.
All parties involved in the QA plan should have their internal QA systems clearly defined in form
of a specific Quality Assurance Manual (QAM) for the respective purposes, such as, QAM for
manufactured products (by the manufacturers or suppliers). It is also necessary for
owner/purchaser to have his own internal QA plan. QA for highway project as a whole integrating
all these plans shall be prepared/or approved by the owner and/or approving authority, if any.
Each vendor (i.e., supplier, designer, Contractor, and manufacturer) will thus, have his own
internal QA procedures, which are required to be agreed upon, in advance, with the purchaser of
the respective activity. As highway building in India is mostly undertaken by Govt. agencies, it is
necessary that the Contractor/designer obtains concurrence of their QAM from the concerned
Government agency. The Guidelines provided in Chapter 2 should be used by the respective
parties in evolving of the operational QAM to be agreed between the Contractor and the
Department for adoption at site.
The major elements mentioned below are the main headings that comprise the Quality System.
Subsequent chapters describe the procedures to be followed for each of the main headings above.
Every Supervision Consultant / Contractor shall be, in the final eventuality, responsible for
establishing its own quality assurance procedures. Various elements of the Quality Manual should
be prepared and revised by the respective Supervision Consultant because of their greater
knowledge of the local conditions, specifications etc. for their respective packages. The Quality
Manual should not be thought of as a static document. It should be frequently reviewed, and
where procedures are found to be unsatisfactory for some reason they should be amended.
This manual is not intended to be a contractual document, nor is it to take precedence over the
specifications. Rather it is merely a guide and reference to the various site staff in the supervision
of project in discharging their duties in a smooth and systematic manner. It can be updated on
periodic manner.
The master copy should be held by the Project Manager, Supervision Consultant, together with a
record of the issue of copies and revisions.
Copies should be issued to all Resident Engineers and access to it should be freely available to all
consultant’s personnel. Extra copies may be required to facilitate this.
Master copies of all revisions should be held separately for back reference.
Superseded sheets whenever held should be clearly indicated by a diagonal red stripe.
Earthwork
Backfill
Sub-grade
Sub-grade Course
Under Construction
Quality Control
Judgement No Remedial
Compare with the Percent MDD
Obtain Density for measurement
Result of Material Check
Quality Control & rolling
Test Before the
Work Unacceptable
Yes
On Going
Quality Assurance Flow Chart for Quality Control for Concrete Work
Concrete Work
Drainage
Structural
Cube Concrete
Yes
Decide Job Mix Proportion
Under Construction
Quality Control
Investigate /
Reject
Process Quality Control Work Quality Control
Yes On Going
Construction of Major High – Level Bridges across Panvel – Mahad – Panjim Road NH-66 (Old-
NH-17) at Km. 91+000 God River, Km. 94+400 Kal River, and Km. 161+400 Choradi River in
Raigad essentially consists of construction of road with flexible pavement with shoulders, major
bridges. Thus, the total task assignment calls for coordinated action from personnel having
experience of various streams who have to work in tandem for successful timely completion of
the project. This manual broadly outlines a general guidance for proper supervision during
construction stage and is essentially intended to assist the project field personnel in carrying out
the contract work in an orderly, procedural and efficient manner.
In the project
The Authority is the Chief Engineer (National Highways), Public Works Department Mumbai.
Trigidhe Contractor is the firm/company who has been assigned by the Authority for under taking
the actual construction work, here it is Reliance – CAI joint Venture and Subcontractor is Shinde
Developers Pvt Ltd.
4.2 Inter-relationship
It is pertinent that the services of the - Client-Authority Engineer and Contractor - should be
aimed at only one goal of completing the project in accordance with technical specifications and
contract documents. Hence to achieve the desired quality of work within the scheduled time frame
as well as a pragmatic approach in rendering the services in a most effective manner, an
interaction between them is of absolute necessity. They should assist each other for the greater
interest of the project. Mutual understanding and equanimity is required when dealing with
problems of conflicts, difference in opinion in any contractual matter. Attempt should be made to
arrive at a mutually acceptable decision if not unanimous which will bring the three parties to
work as a close-knit team with high degree of understanding and co-operation among themselves
for the success of the project. This can only be achieved through meetings and discussions, which
will bridge the communication gap between them.
The Engineer is Senior Resident Engineer (SRE) usually operates and carries out his duties
through his Resident Engineer, Site Engineers and Supervisor who will carry out all field duties
on behalf of the Engineer and exercise authority as delegated to each one of them. For fulfilling
the above stated objectives, Engineer will be assisted by a team of qualified, experienced and
professional staff at the site of work.
A chart showing Engineers' establishment at the project site is shown in below Figure.
Flow Chart
Project Manager
1 No.
Surveyor
Laboratory Technician 3 Nos.
6 Nos.
Note: Additional supporting Staff include Computer operator, Secretary, Accountant, and
Messenger.
Scope of services, as stated in Contractor Agreement is fairly comprehensive and need not be
reproduced here except for highlighting some salient points with clear understanding of task
assignment throughout the stages of pretender, during execution of work, post completion and
other special tasks if any.
Work will be carried out by a team of Senior Engineers and field staff, under the leadership of
Engineer, with reasonable and pragmatic approach where compliance with contract documents
specifications is essential.
Supervision Consultant with suitably qualified and experience staff has been appointed to assist
the Contractor in the implementation of Project as per the Contactors Agreement.
General approach would be to adopt a well thought out strategy that will ensure time bound
deliverables, acceptable progress of the project with quality work and above all the final product
i.e. completion & handing over of project with satisfaction of Authority meeting the requirement
in Agreement.
Field Office to operate and control all field activities and to maintain liaison with
Contractor or his representative
Field Laboratory to control over acceptability of material for use in permanent work or
intended to be used in permanent work
Contractor’s safety & comply with provisions of contract, subsequent legislation &
establishment law of land in respect of labour, safety, insurance, medical and other
welfare aspects.
Descriptions of jobs issued to Supervision contractors staff shall include the duties listed below.
These duties relate primarily to supervision of construction as it relates to Quality Assurance of
construction. They do not cover contractual matters and measurement which should be added as
appropriate by the Project Manager/Senior Engineer to individual descriptions.
The job descriptions for each individual shall be issued by the Project Manager/Senior Engineer and
shall include the following:
a) Name
b) Position or title
c) Name of immediate superior
d) Extent of responsibilities (physical location and scope of work)
e) Conditions of employment
f) Duties as described below
g) Duties additional to those described below
a) Act under the direction of the Senior Engineer (Structures / Highways) to whom they are
assigned.
c) Familiarize themselves with and follow Quality Assurance procedures described in the Q.A.
Manual
e) Carry out field inspections for road and bridge works as per QAP and Contract Technical
Specifications in approved proforma.
f) Liaise with Contractors / Supervision Consultant staff responsible for materials and
workmanship to ensure:
i. Materials in use are approved
ii. Testing is carried out as required
i. Contractors activities
ii. Plant working/standing times on each activity
iii. Labour working/standing times on each activity
iv. Progress made
v. Inspections carried out
vi. Works approved/not approved
vii. Duties carried out by himself
viii. Instructions received
ix. Verbal communications with Contractor
Approval of Work
Field Engineers shall sign Request for Inspection Forms and checks the work. Approval for the
work shall be given by Project Manager/Senior Engineer.
Field Engineers shall not issue instructions to the Contractor unless specifically directed to do so
by the Senior Engineer (Structures / Highways).
k) Direct clerical staff assigned to his division and ensures that filing of correspondence and site
records is maintained in an orderly manner.
Instructions to Contractor’s
Senior Engineers shall only issue instructions to the Contractor’s with regard to compliance or
non-compliance with the Contract requirements. Such instructions shall be maintained in a field
register in mutually agreed format.
Senior Engineer shall not instruct additional work beyond the scope of the Contract.
c) Familiarize himself with the specified Codes of Practice and Standards relating to materials
quality control and workmanship.
d) Familiarize himself with and follow the Quality Assurance procedures described in the QA
Manual.
e) Carryout and direct Site Engineers on the field sampling, testing and inspection of materials
and workmanship.
f) Liaise with the Supervision Consultant /Contractor staff responsible for works construction.
h) Be responsible for reviewing Contractor’s material and workmanship proposals and method
statements.
l) Direct clerical staff assigned to his division and ensure that filing of correspondence and site
records is maintained in an orderly manner.
Instructions to Contractor
Material Engineers shall only issue instructions to the Contractor’s with regard to compliance
or non-compliance with the Contract requirements. Such instructions shall be maintained in a
field register in mutually agreed format.
Material Engineer shall not instruct work additional to the Contract scope.
However, so far as it related to Quality Assurance, the PM’s duties shall include the following:
b) Issue of written job descriptions to individuals. These shall include the duties listed in sections
above with or without appropriate modifications.
d) Ensuring the correct and efficient execution of duties by individual staff members. This shall
include:
i. Regular objective assessment of individual job performance.
ii. Guidance and direction in areas of shortcomings.
iii. Overall staff organization for maximum efficiency taking account of individual
strengths and weaknesses.
g) Approval of work. He shall ensure the correct levels of approval authority are maintained.
In all cases the PM is finally responsible for work approval irrespective of approvals or
rejections by subordinate staff.
h) Holding weekly meetings with the Contractor’s to ensure proper superintendence of work by
the Contractor’s. Matters relating to construction problems, materials and workmanship,
method statements, trials etc. should be discussed.
i) Correspondence and Records. The PM shall ensure that all facts and salient points relating to
execution of the works are comprehensively recorded in written correspondence and records.
Registers of drawings shall be kept as detailed in this document to ensure that the latest approved
drawings only are used for the construction of each part of the works. The registers shall include
all drawings of both permanent and temporary works.
All the organizations connected with the project shall keep registers of drawings, these
organization being:
a) Project Management Consultants - the authority responsible for ensuring correct execution of
the Works and approval of temporary works drawings.
b) Contractor’s responsible for the execution of the Works and preparation of temporary works
drawings.
c) PWD (NH DIVISON) - The Client
Drawings, specifications, work instructions and other road related documents shall be maintained
as described below to ensure that only the latest approved documents are used for the construction
of each part of the work, which covers both the temporary and the permanent works:
a) The issuing authority should maintain the registers of drawings/documents giving information
about reference number, revision reference, title/date of issue, to whom issued, number of
copies issued, status of issue, date of approval, purpose of issue, etc. (Superseded
drawings/documents shall be so super scribed boldly across the heading block).
b) Receiving officer to whom documents are issued at site should maintain similar record.
c) Maintenance and accessibility of site instruction book/order with both issuing party and to
whom issued.
d) Maintenance and accessibility of registers of correspondence files.
e) Daily diary of work
f) List of registers on site.
For quality assurance of work, it is essential to document each and every operation and activity
connected with the work and maintain the record of inspections, approvals/non-approvals and
other statistical day-to-day information about the progress of work. These are normally recorded
in the standard forms (to be specially evolved for each activity) and they constitute an important
component of the Quality Assurance Manual. Each activity or operation could be broadly
categorized as under.
a) Method Statement
The method statements give detailed proposals of the constructing agency which are approved
by the 'Engineer'. These method statements are written in form of various steps in a particular
b) Inspection Performa
These are used for the purpose of seeking approvals from the 'Engineer' or his representative
before commencing every operation, such as, pour cards for concrete, approval to
reinforcement, approval to formwork, approval to setting out, approval to prestressing,
approval to grouting, approval to earthworks, approval to asphalting, etc. These are usually
supplemented by standard check-list which have to be verified by the 'Engineer' and after he
is satisfied about the various points the approval is then accorded on that form.
c) Test Results
This set of Performa is meant for recording the results of day-to-day tests carried out in
accordance with the requirements or specifications. The Performa are usually maintained in
two forms; one is loose leaf system for recording the various observations during each test
and second is for recording the summary of test results in a register form to facilitate analysis
later.
e) Non-conforming Products
Detailed statements have to be prepared describing the procedures to be followed as soon as
any result not conforming to the requirements (or unusually better results) is obtained. Such
statements deal with the (i) procedures to be adopted for rectification of the particular
component where such result have been noticed, (ii) the long-term corrective action, and
(iii) immediate preventive actions in other similarly affected activities till the long-term
corrective actions are implemented.
f) Quality Audit
A separate set of proformae with detailed instructions are laid down for facilitating the audit
of the quality assurance by an Authority Engineer unit at periodical intervals.
5.4 Correspondence
On a major contract such as this a large quantity of documents are used and records and
correspondence generated. It is essential that a comprehensive filing system exists and a register
of document files kept to enable quick recovery of documents. This is necessary if valuable time
is not to be wasted carrying out searches or particular documents.
For monitoring the progress, a report containing progress as well as other information is to be
prepared every month or on a time basis as per Contract. Progress Report should contain various
happenings at site but not limited to
a) Executive Summary showing physical progress, up-to-date expenditure, project assessment
and any significant events
b) Project Data depicting Loan No, Funding Agency (if any), Original Sanctioned Cost,
Estimated Project Cost, Tender Amount, Civil Contract Details, Consultancy Contract details
etc.
c) Project "S" curve
d) Preconstruction Activity
e) Major Road Works item, Bridge & Culvert Items
f) Variation Order, Claim
g) Quality Control Certification
h) Construction Constraints (both for Contractor and Authority)
i) Substantial Completion, Liquidated Damage
j) Financial - IPC, Advance, Current Contract Amount, Escalation, Value of Taking Over
Certificate
k) Project Staffing - Authority, Consultant, Contractor - any change to be intimated
l) Other matters of interest like stages of construction with respect to milestones. The work plan
for the next month.
m) Charts, figures, photographs.
n) Equipment and machinery status
It is essential for the project to prepare procedure for proper documentation of various important
events during the implementation of project. Before the actual execution starts i.e. just before
issue of NTP, the status and condition of existing road also to be documented which when
improved will give a better idea about the nature of improvement done and functional efficiency
of the improved road which then be compared with the old existing one. Important activities are
also to be documented when necessary. These documents are to be photographed or video-filmed
properly referred with respect to location and time of picturization.
In each organization connected with the project one person shall be appointed to maintain
registers of drawings as described above. This shall normally be the CAD operators in the
organization. He shall answer to the engineer responsible for design or construction as
appropriate.
Summaries - The person identified as above shall prepare each month a summary of drawings
issued or received. The purpose of the summaries is to identify potential delays in drawing
production or approval to prevent delays to construction. The summaries should enable the
engineer in charge to compare data with target programmed figures and to take action to prevent
delays. This will help in identifying drawings awaited for execution.
In each organization connected with the project one engineer shall be appointed to manage the
production, receipt allocation of drawings, etc. He shall ensure that the register is properly
maintained as described above and shall carry out the following duties:
a) Give directions on the issue of drawings i.e. to whom, number of copies, etc.
b) Allocate duties of reviewing, checking and commenting to individual engineers and
technicians.
c) Ensure that the register is properly maintained.
d) Ensure that production / review of drawings is carried out as per programmed to prevent
construction delays.
e) Review periodic summaries of drawings status, identify potential areas of delay and take
action to prevent delay.
f) Inspect the registers regularly.
g) Liaise with other organizations and hold meetings to establish drawing preparation and
approval priorities.
their correctness
detail and logical sequence of operation
capability with agreed workable machinery & equipment
compatibility with output of machineries vis-a-vis time period
anticipated monthly turn over dependent on financial progress
back up support of cash flow schedule
Depending on the progress of work not conforming to the approved work program or any change
in operation due to various reasons, the program will call for revising schedule to ensure
completion of the works within the Time for Completion.
For the interest of Project, it may be necessary to assist the Contractor in advising him on up- to-
date technique for project control, construction method, sequence, scheduling and organizational
setup. The Engineer would interact closely with the agency while reviewing and approving
Contractor’s work program.
a) A bar chart showing different activities under the various principal (Milestone) tasks, their
relationship and criticality along with likely deviation and time limit of each activity within
the total time frame of project based on available equipment, and production rate.
b) A detailed network programme encompassing detailed break up of tasks, resource allocation
of tasks based on their maximum availability parallel activities, scheduling of resources,
establishment of milestone and critical path from the date of commencement of work to its
completion.
Programme should be verified critically with proper analysis, evaluation and monitoring progress
of work. The consultant shall uphold the spirit of contract bearing in mind that time is the essence
of Contract.
Having identified the bottleneck and problems appropriate solution to be suggested based on
which rescheduling of work programme wherever necessary to be done for completion of project
within the period prescribed in the contract.
Cash flow generally becomes a big hurdle in running the project site, which ultimately hampers
the progress. So a realist’s cash flow estimate based on payments to which the Contractor will be
entitled under the contract or from Contractors other sources, should be prepared which will be
compatible with work programme.
The Engineer will interact with Contractor for proper interpretation of contract condition,
Technical Specification and above all Contractors obligation for executing and completing the
work with due care and diligence including remedying any defects. If any ambiguity and
inconsistency exists in the contract documents, consultant will work with Authority to clarity
these aspects.
Original contract amount may undergo changes due to quantity overrun, quantity under un with
respect to provisions in bills of quantity or for any other reasons. Accordingly, contract amount
need to be revised frequently preferably every month based on variations which will be effected
during that particular month. These variations may arise as a result of change or unforeseen
conditions, changed scope of work, un priced work, nonscheduled work, modification of original
plan and specification due to change in character of work or alteration in character of work
resulting in increased / reduced quantity. All these changes in contract amount will be notified to
the Contractor through variation orders. Fixation of rates and their application on condition of
contract, proper justification necessitating variation and financial implication therefore will be
properly drafted and approved by the Authority. This variation order then will become a legally
binding part of the contract.
In case of subletting a part of work, when requested by Contractor and provided in the contract,
necessary advice will be given to Authority in respect of necessity of subletting, suitability of
Sub-Contractor, impact of sub-contract on the main contract and finished work, degree of
sensitivity of work assigned under the subcontract and general advisability or otherwise subletting
in a particular situation.
Timely procurement and processing of material are of vital importance in accelerating progress.
Hence a procurement program of material with a pragmatic approach towards specialized sub-
contracted / manufactured items should be prepared commensurate with requirement. Programme
should be sufficiently in advance with proposed planning of its timely requirement as well as total
requirement for the project It is always better to keep a buffer stock of one month's requirement
not only for smooth running of project but also for offsetting unforeseen circumstances. Seasonal
hindrances for borrow pits when the soil is neither borrowable nor compatible due to presence of
excessive moisture will be taken care of by timely precautionary measures. Stock piling during
dry season on highlands in the vicinity of project road for shorter haulage will be more effective to
avoid delay and consequently delay in construction of further layers. Accordingly, a material
inventory will be maintained for monitoring continuous supply, advance procurement, provision
& storage of approved quality construction material in sufficient quantity along with their
incorporation in works so as to ensure unobstructed progress of works in line with construction
programme.
Deployment and utilization of proper equipment matching with time schedule besides
procurement of material plays a most vital role for the progress of project. Technical Specification
has been prepared to suit equipment-oriented method of construction. For the mechanized
construction activities, the Contractor should have adequate and right type of equipment for
various construction activities. Hence during construction, the deployment of standard and
specialized equipment including their suitability, efficacy, condition, age, workability proposed
by the Contractor’s shall be examined.
Although the Contractor is entitled to schedule his work as he sees fit, the Supervision Consultant
shall prefer and recommend a balanced schedule for consistent output reflecting optimum
utilisation & equipment requirements. Starting of too many different items in a particular time
makes the program optimistic or perhaps a little unrealistic. Due consideration should be given for
some lead time for aggregate production required for different pavement layers after setting up
and commissioning of plant.
The Contractor’s arrived at his equipment needs based on total quantities. This may be very
misleading in case where more than two operations proposed to be carried on simultaneously.
Equipment may be adequate to carry out the total quantity over the contract period but may be
totally inadequate to carryout simultaneous operations that may have been scheduled over specific
periods. The Contractors estimated production rates for equipment should be reasonable. In any
event a major break down of key machinery will have a serious effect on progress and it would be
prudent that requirement of additional equipment should be looked into. Contractor’s should plan
his activities in such a way that
Equipment’s will work in tandem close together to reinforce each rather in the case of break-
down and that maintenance aspects, spare-parts etc. are fully implemented.
Scheduled monthly production should be more uniform, consistent unless the Contractor has
some particular reason to have them fluctuate.
Actual anticipated quantities are used for deployment of machineries in place of quantities
shown in the Bill of Quantities, if they are significantly different.
The implementation of proper maintenance programme can be assured for all major
equipment to minimize down time. This would include routine and preventative maintenance
including stocking of adequate spare-parts.
In order to have an acceptable equipment production rate, the same shall be arrived at following
discussion with consultant's staff, Project Manager, Contractor’s representative based on actual
observation of some activities on site and theoretical rates in other instances.
A table of major equipment based on total quantities will be prepared which should be updated at
suitable interval depending on the performance and progress.
A Bar type chart summarizing the major road activities, the months when the activities are to take
place and the quantity to be performed each month will also be prepared for reflecting an uniform
and consistent output.
Based on requirement for each individual item of work, total requirement equipment wise will
then be evaluated for comparing with contract and the Contractor’s may be informed accordingly
for enhancement in deployment of machinery which was deficient in original contract, increase in
quantity or balance time vis-a-vis balance quantity.
Supervisory staff shall monitor the deployment of machinery and their actual utilisation vis-a-vis
total requirement of equipment proposed.
The progress of works should be compared with respect to the programme already approved and
agreed by the Contractor’s Any shortfall or lag behind the schedule should be brought to the
notice of Contractor’s for taking necessary steps to compensate the same so that the progress can
be accelerated for completing the project within the contract period. Monitoring and updating
activities will extend over the entire duration of construction period at regular interval. Consultant
will provide necessary assistance in adopting the most appropriate technique satisfying the
requirement of client, funding agency, Contractor’s and above all for the interest of the project.
Depending on the observance, analysis of performance and variance against the scheduled
programme, cash flow projection, delays (non-compensable delays, compensable delays) will be
reviewed. These would be updated periodically to minimize the effect of such variance on the
project implementation process.
If the shifting of target date for final completion or part completion appears unavoidable due to
delays, consultant will prepare a revised schedule based on time loss due to various reasons for
advance information to Authority. Total loss of time not necessarily be the addition of all losses
because of overlapping or simultaneous happenings of two or more events. A bar diagram also to
be prepared.
Considering the convenience, methodology & sequence of construction commensurate with site
condition the Contractor’s may propose to carry out the activities which may be, staggered both
vertically & horizontally in scattered stretches within the selected length in different layers on
each side of proposed road centerline. To monitor the progress and also for check/balance of any
particular layer, consultant suggest for maintaining
Each organization shall appoint a professional qualified land surveyor to be responsible for this
work. The setting out data for the work including lines, levels and layouts as available from the
contract documents would be checked by the Consultants prior to handing over to the Contractor’s
for setting-out works. The Bench Marks and HIPs including reference points would be shown and
handed over to the Contractor’s
All surveys, measurements, etc. will be permanently recorded on field books or drawings. These
will be properly indexed, numbered and presented to form the permanent record of the job. In
addition, periodic check surveys will be made to ensure that the line, levels and permanent and
temporary bench marks are properly maintained with respect to the survey monuments. Any
discrepancies or anomalies will be reported to the Contractor’s under intimation to PWD (NH
DIVISON) along with suggested rectification measures.
The setting out of the Works shall be controlled by the establishment of approved Survey Control
Stations. These stations shall be related to the National or Local Grid as directed by the
Supervision Consultant. The stations shall be defined by three co-ordinates, these being Easting,
Northing, and Level in metres above datum and a Station Number.
The control stations shall be of robust construction located on firm standings and protected by
suitable barricades from disturbance by outside agents, site traffic and the like.
Setting Out Points, S.O.P.'s shall be established from the survey control stations and shall be
defined by three co-ordinates - Easting, Northing and Level. These points shall be used for the
setting out of the works. They shall be of robust construction, located on firm standings and
protected by suitable barricading from disturbance.
Schedules of Control Stations and S.O.P.'s shall be prepared by the Contractor’s for approval by
the Supervision Consultant. These schedules shall contain the following information:
a) Control Station and S.O.P. number
b) Co-ordinates - Easting, Northing, Level
c) Date Approved for each marker
d) Revision Date
e) Distribution record
The schedules shall be regularly updated. The Supervision Consultant shall ensure that only the
latest revised approved schedule of markers or stations is used for setting out purposes and shall
arrange for the withdrawal from use of superseded schedules. Accordingly, records of distribution
of schedules shall be kept.
The Contractor’s Surveyor shall maintain a programme of regular checking of Survey Control
Stations and S.O.P.'s at monthly or weekly intervals as agreed with the Supervision Consultant.
Where it is suspected that disturbance may have occurred to a particular station or point it shall be
immediately withdrawn from the approved list and its co-ordinate values shall be re-established.
On every occasion that the Contractor’s re-establishes co-ordinate values for a station or marker
he shall submit these for approval by the Supervision Consultant. This shall be done irrespective
of whether or not the values have been altered since the previous establishment.
The Supervision Consultant Surveyor shall maintain a programme of periodic checking of control
stations and S.O.P.'s and shall check all establishment or re-establishment of co-ordinates
submitted for approval by the Contractor’s. Where co-ordinate values are not agreed the
Supervision, Consultant shall immediately notify the Contractor that the Station and S.O.P. in
question is not approved.
All requests for approval of survey stations and S.O.P.'s shall be made by the Contractor’s in
writing accompanied by suitable plans or sketches. This written request shall be made on a
Request for Inspection.
The Contractor’s shall set out the Works using only approved Survey Control Stations and Setting
Out Points and shall submit the setting out for approval by the Supervision Consultant.
No permanent works shall be approved without the prior approval of the setting out by the
Supervision Consultant.
The Supervision Consultant shall check the setting out for correctness of the plan alignment,
levels and dimensions in accordance with the approved drawings for construction.
The importance of temporary works cannot be over emphasized for the attainment of safety and
good workmanship and a sound durable structure. Temporary works are often structurally
complex and cover a wide variety of structural materials and loading conditions. It is therefore
essential that these works are overseen by competent experienced qualified engineers.
It should be borne in mind that Contractual responsibility & liability for temporary works lies
with the Contractor’s and therefore the role of the Supervision Consultant under the Contract is
one of approval or non-approval of Contractor’s temporary works. Care shall be taken by the
Supervision Consultant that no specific instructions are issued which can be construed to relieve
the Contractors of or prevent him from carrying out his contractual obligations.
Temporary works shall be designed in accordance with specified codes of practice or as per
contract specifications. Calculations shall be produced by the Contractor’s along with drawings
and method statement. The design shall consider all the loads mentioned in the codes including
accidental and wind loads. Consideration shall be given to deflections to ensure specified finished
work tolerances.
Although the contractual responsibility for temporary works lies with the Contractor’s, checking
of proposals is an essential part of the Quality Assurance of the permanent works.
Contractor’s shall furnish the design and drawings of all temporary works such as formwork
including their supports for approval of the Consultants before any section is taken up. Therefore,
the Supervision Consultant’s Engineer shall check that proposals are in accordance with the
design codes. Notwithstanding any approval or review of drawings and design of the Consultants,
the Contractor shall be entirely responsible for the adequacy and safety for temporary works.
It is necessary to consider all details including strengths of connections, adequacy of bracing, load
bearing stiffeners & other vital components.
Erection of temporary works should not proceed without approved drawings except for minor
temporary works where failure will not jeopardize site safety. Erection shall be strictly in
accordance with the approved drawings. Where it is necessary due to unforeseen circumstances to
depart from the approved drawings, approval shall first be obtained from the Supervision
Consultant's Engineer and drawings amended accordingly.
During the erection of temporary works, checking shall be carried out by the Supervision
Consultant staff to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. Any departures from this shall
be reported to Supervision Consultant’s Engineer.
On completion of erection, the Contractor’s shall submit a written request for inspection to the
Supervision Consultant whose staff shall then complete detailed checking of the works.
Once both the Contractor’s and the Supervision Consultant’s Engineers are satisfied with the
temporary works, a Temporary Works Approval Certificate shall be jointly signed prior to loading
the works.
After due consideration of Safety, size, importance and the possible consequences of failure of
any particular temporary works, Supervision Consultant shall designate whether or not
Certification is required. Usually minor formwork shall not require a certificate.
Care shall be taken to ensure loading is carried out in accordance with the sequence envisaged in
the design and described in the approved method statement. Where possible deflections shall be
measured and compared to anticipated values.
The timing of dismantling of temporary works shall be as specified. The Contractor’s shall obtain
written approval from the Supervision Consultant to dismantle temporary works to ensure no
damage results to the permanent works.
The sequence of dismantling is often overlooked with consequent accident. Therefore the
dismantling of temporary works shall be included in the approved method statement. Checking
shall be carried out to ensure that approved procedures are followed.
Where specified or where considered necessary by the Supervision Consultant, the Contractor’s
shall submit method statements for the execution of the permanent work to specification. The
procedure for method statement shall generally be as follows: -
The Contractor’s shall submit written method statements clearly detailing each step of the
proposed method of execution of the particular part of the works concerned. The statement shall
cover the following aspects: -
b) Plant & equipment : The Contractor’s shall submit proposals for plant &
equipment / machinery including manufacture's details and
performance specifications.
d) Method description The stage by stage method description shall be fully detailed in
sequential order.
e) Testing a) the method shall allow for testing at intervals or key stages
and the times for this shall be taken into account.
b) the Contractor’s shall submit the complete list of testing
equipment and proposed location of field laboratory.
The Supervision Consultant shall scrutinize the points described above to ensure compliance with
the Specification and satisfy himself on the provision made for trials, testing & stage approval of
works. He shall check that the proposed plant, equipment & human resources appear realistic to
carry out the works to programme. He shall make written comment to the Contractor on points
with which he is not satisfied until acceptable proposals are received and can be approved. The
adequacy of resources allocated to the work can be determined during trials as described below at
para 9.4. The Consultants will examine the job-mix and associated details submitted by the
Contractor in respect of sub-base, base course, asphalt concrete mixes and cement concrete mixes
and approve these, based on his Authority Engineer review and testing. Any modification
/ re-testing required will be promptly communicated to the Contractor.
Laboratory and field test result will be recorded on standard format established in QA Manual.
The Consultants, if necessary, will instruct the Contractor to carry out special tests on materials in
accordance with IRC guidelines / MoRT&H or other International specifications conforming to
contract provisions to ensure specified quality control standards.
Guidelines regarding safety of operations and environmental protection, will be checked and
verified by the Consultants in consideration of the contract provisions, the relevant local laws and
regulations also conforming to regulated standards.
It will be ensured that the Contractor’s adopts suitable preventive and corrective measures to
minimize the risks from the above-mentioned causes and avoid any damages to life or property or
existing services resulting from the operations or activities.
Once approved, the written method statement shall be issued to Contractor’s personnel
responsible for execution of the work and the Supervision Consultant staff responsible for
supervision. The concerned staff shall make themselves familiar with the proposed method. No
departure from the method statement shall be made unless resubmission of a revised statement is
made and re-approval obtained.
For all work items, at the commencement, as required by the specification, Trial Stretches will be
made to demonstrate the construction norms for quality work as is expected of the Contractor’s.
These trial stretches will also identify the skill and training requirement of
Trials, although sometimes costly & cause initial delay, frequently benefit the Contractor’s in the
longer term by resulting in establishment of efficient practice & first-time approval of works.
They are of obvious advantage to the Authority in reducing faulty execution of permanent work
and establishing confidence in the execution of critical works. Trials can sometimes be
economically carried out by taking advantage of temporary works execution to try out permanent
works e.g. concrete for temporary cofferdams using proposed permanent works trials mixes.
Where appropriate, work trials away from the permanent works shall be carried out. This is
particularly necessary where the following circumstances: -
During trials, careful monitoring, measurement & testing shall be carried out and the results
documented for assessment and comparison to specification requirements. The results shall be
reviewed & discussions held between the Supervision Consultant and the Contractor’s. At this
stage minor or major changes can be made to the proposals and re-trials ordered as necessary.
Where the nature of the work permits, trial samples of work can be carried out on the permanent
work. This will usually be restricted to cases where faulty work can more easily be rectified or
removal is less costly. This will apply to more routine non-complex work.
It is frequently the case that trials cannot truly represent the real site conditions and methods
which were satisfactory in the trial require modification & re-appraisal. Therefore, special
vigilance shall be exercised both by the Contractor’s superintending personnel and the
Supervision Consultant’s supervising staff when a particular category of permanent work starts or
circumstances change. If necessary re-trials shall be carried out where the first trials were clearly
unrepresentative of the existing conditions.
10.0 MATERIALS
10.1 Outline of Materials Procedures
The Contractor’s is primarily responsible to carry out tests on naturally occurring materials and
manufactured materials and works in accordance with Contract provisions, IRC / MoRT&H
specifications and sound engineering practices. The Consultant shall assess and review all tests
and in case found necessary, will carry out Authority Engineer tests in field laboratory.
The main elements of the procedures for Materials Quality Assurance are as follows:
10.1.7 Summaries
Summaries of test data, results & compliance shall be prepared at intervals as specified or directed
by the Engineer or Material Engineer.
10.2.2 Tests
The tests required are all those detailed in the Contract Technical Specification or in the Standard
Specifications (IRC & IS) referred to by the above documents. A full list of all the required tests
shall be drawn up by the Material Engineer for Materials.
c) Criticality of the material to the structural overall. For the main materials in structurally
critical areas no reductions in test frequency should be contemplated which might give rise to
doubts on assurance of quality control. For all materials, careful consideration must be given
before reductions are made. All changes to the frequency of testing must be approved by the
Material Engineer.
d) The use of certificated data. Where the Material Engineer is satisfied that Authority Engineer
& reliable test certificates exist, a reduction in test frequency may be authorized.
10.3.1 Delivery
A log of material deliveries to site shall be maintained and all materials shall be inspected on
arrival. The Material Engineer shall initiate a system of notification by the Contractor of expected
deliveries.
10.3.3 Marking
The Contractor’s shall be required where specified to clearly mark materials to identify their
origin, grade and constituent.
All the materials brought to the site shall be stacked and stored as specified so as to prevent
deterioration or intrusion by foreign matter and to ensure the preservation of their quality and
fitness for work. Materials which have been improperly stored or have been stored for long
periods shall be re-tested where their suitability for incorporation in the work is in doubt.
10.3.5 Non-Compliance
Where the Contractor fails to control materials then approval shall be withheld or withdrawn as
appropriate.
10.3.6 Control Documents
The Material Engineer shall initiate logs and record proformas which list deliveries and record
satisfactory or unsatisfactory packaging, transport, marking and storage.
10.4.1 Tests
Laboratory and field tests will be performed on materials and works at the frequencies laid down
in the Contract Specification by Contractor’s under direct supervision of the Consultants. All
these tests will be authenticated by the Consultant’s Material Engineer that these tests have been
done in their presence. The records of all tests performed on materials and works will be
maintained by Consultants with a copy of test results furnished to the Contractor.
10.4.2 Sampling
The following procedure shall be followed:
a) Details of sampling shall be logged in a sample record sheet for each sample taken.
b) This record sheet shall be returned with the sample to the laboratory.
c) Details shall be transferred from the record sheet & entered in the appropriate test data record
book.
d) Any necessary future test dates shall be logged in the Laboratory Schedule / Diary to ensure
testing at the correct date.
The Material Engineer shall prepare the necessary proformas for sample record sheets for the
different materials and shall initiate and maintain Laboratory Record Books and Laboratory
Schedules.
The Material Engineer shall examine this log and take appropriate action where the test frequency
is less than required.
10.4.6 Non-Compliance
All test result record sheets shall be submitted to and examined by the Material Engineer. He shall
ensure that the correct procedure for non-complying materials are followed. This shall be as
specified i.e. rejection, retesting followed by rejection / acceptance etc.
The completed summaries serve also as a status check on Quality Assurance i.e. they show
whether or not the necessary testing has in fact been done.
a) mean of results
b) S.D. of results
c) range of results
d) maximum and minimum values
e) number of non-compliances
f) correlation between properties
g) deviations from range
h) running totals
i) others
10.5.3 Non-Compliance
Any non-compliance must be detailed and actions taken reported. A daily register of non-
compliance shall be prepared and actions signed off by the Material Engineer as required.
10.5.4 Proformas
Example proformas are provided for cement data and concrete test data in Chapter 19.
Appropriate proformas shall be prepared by the Supervision Consultant for all materials.
10.6.1 Procedure
For each concrete pour a full record shall be kept of details of the pour. These shall include: -
11.0 WORKMANSHIP
11.1 Inspection of Work
The primary means by which quality of work in the field can be assured is by inspection in a
regular and systematic manner. The staff of the Supervision Consultant shall routinely inspect
work. Inspections shall be made irrespective of whether or not a Request for Inspection has been
made by the Contractor’s
Procedures & preformat shall be written for inspection of each category of the work. Staff of the
Supervision Consultant shall familiarize themselves with these procedures and carry out
inspections accordingly.
It is beneficial to the works if faults are identified early before rectification becomes difficult,
costly & delays progress. Therefore, irrespective of whether a Request for Inspection has been
submitted faulty work shall be notified as soon as possible to the Contractor. Written confirmation
should follow if no action is taken.
It is the Contractor’s s responsibility to ensure correct construction of the Works & he should
provide sufficient competent superintendence to achieve this. Care should be taken by the
Supervision Consultant’s staff not to communicate instructions or directives to the Contractor’s
operatives. Liaison should be maintained through the Contractors superintending staff.
For Quality Assurance to be achieved it shall be mandatory that Requests for Inspection and
Approval or Non-Approval of works are made in writing. This is the only way in which confusion
& dispute on these matters can be avoided and a smooth-running professional relationship can be
maintained between Contractor’s and Supervision Consultant’s personnel.
The use of written requests for inspection also provides an historical record of construction
sequence & events.
The Request forms shall be submitted in quadruplicate, preferably colour coded, as follows: -
It is necessary for Quality Assurance to ensure that no aspects of workmanship are omitted from
an inspection. Therefore, proformas shall be produced for each category of work or stage of
construction.
These proformas may be linked to specific Requests for Inspection or simply used for routine
inspection. Proformas should be carried on site and completed during the inspection. For formal
inspections, the proformas shall be attached to the Request for Inspection for information of the
engineer authorized to sign the Request form.
The Supervision Consultant shall designate in writing to each member of staff his level of
authority with respect to approval of works. It is important to have sufficient suitably experienced
& authorized staff on the site so that formal approval is not delayed due to absence of particular
individuals.
Each member of the Supervision Consultants staff shall make himself familiar with his permitted
lavel of authority & where this is unclear shall seek clarification from his immediate superior or
the Supervision Consultant.
A very large number of Requests for inspection are normally generated in any large project. It is
necessary to establish and maintain a system of filling so that the records of inspection are easily
recoverable. Of the two copies of Requests for Inspection retained by the Supervision Consultant
one shall be filled in simple chronological order and the other under the heading of the relevant
part of the work.
The inspections may be preliminary, periodic or on completion of work. These will have to be
carried out during various stages of construction. Check lists shall be followed to systemize the
inspection procedures. The inspection procedures of some categories of work are described in this
section. The Supervision Consultant’s staff carrying out inspections shall follow the procedures
described below.
11.6.1 Foundations
The preliminary, periodic & completion checks shall be made as described below and recorded on
proforma record sheets. Examples of record sheet are shown in Chapter 19. These examples do
not cover all the checks & records for which further proformas shall be prepared by the Senior
Engineer (Quality Assurance).
11.6.2 Formwork
Apart from considerations of site safety, properly designed and erected formwork is essential for
durability, serviceability and aesthetics of the permanent works. Failure are costly. Grout loss
creates unsound concrete. Excessive deflections lead to incorrect dimensions and poor
appearance. Poor quality formwork materials and workmanship cause unsightly finishes.
For Quality Assurance, the procedures described below shall be followed when checking and
approving formwork. The checks shall be carried out using the check list proforma given in
Chapter 19 on which the results of the inspection shall be recorded.
Formwork Drawings
Except for minor works as agreed by the Supervision Consultant formwork should be properly
designed, timber/metal stresses and deflections calculated and details shown on scale drawings or
sketches for the carpenters/joiners. These should be prepared by the Contractor’s and checked and
approved by the Supervision Consultant.
Formwork Erection
This should be checked against the approved sketches or drawings for correctness of line, level,
member sizes, spacing, grout tightness, tie rods, fillets, chamfers, cast in items (ducts, box-outs
etc) and material quality.
The check shall ensure that the form work will carry the imposed loads, form the concrete to the
desired shape and dimensions without loss of any constitute concrete material and produce the
specified finish.
Trial Panels
Where specified, trial panels shall be constructed to achieve specified finishes using the proposed
permanent work formwork. The trial panels must represent as closely as possible the real
permanent works, using approved mixes etc. The trials should be used to check such items as joint
details.
11.6.3 Reinforcement
Quality Assurance of reinforcement fixing is only achieved by methodical thorough checking.
Arrangements of reinforcement can be complex and concentration is necessary to ensure
comprehensive checking. Reference must be made to approved working drawings to prevent
omissions.
The checklist proforma shown in Chapter 19 shall be used and each item considered before
approval of works.
The stockpile of bars shall be organised in such a manner that separate deliveries are distinctly
labelled. Approved stock shall be kept separately from stock awaiting approval.
Errors on drawings and schedules can be a major source of steel fixing problems. This can be
minimized by careful drawing and schedule preparation and checking.
The bar bending and cutting equipment shall be checked to ensure correct radii of bends and no
damage to bars. It is essential to check that correct bending wheels are used to prevent overtight
radii and 'necking' of bars.
If specified in the Contract Specifications, this shall be applied and checked after cutting and
bending and rechecked after fixing to identify and rectify handling damage. Checks shall be made
to ensure correct handling practices to minimize damage to protective coats i.e. non-metal slings
for lifting, careful stacking etc.
Bar Fixing
Size and spacing of bars, lap lengths, position of laps, provision of correct cover, sufficiency of
cover blocks shall all be carefully checked. The completed assembly shall be rigidly supported on
'chairs' and tied as specified. This shall be adequate to prevent deflections of the assembly under
action of the concrete gang live load, skip/pump discharge and so on. Flexible assemblies are
detrimental when deflections of reinforcement are transmitted to previously placed concrete in the
initial stages of setting.
11.6.4 Concreting
The procedures and preparation of concreting are complex with several elements all having to be
satisfactory at the same time. There is potential for mishaps and delay with consequent
detrimental effects on the permanent works. Thus, it is essential that all aspects are considered
carefully and all component activities are separately and collectively approved before concreting
begins.
Pre-Concreting Checks
a) Materials shall be approved; trial mixes carried out and approved mixes established.
b) Method statement - the Contractor’s should submit a detailed method statement for concreting
procedures. This should cover the following points:
c) Checks at batching plant shall be made to ensure that sufficient stocks exist of approved
materials, that both the batching plant and standby batching plant are in full working order
and that the correct number of truck mixers in good working order are present.
d) Checks at the site shall include that falsework, formwork and steel fixing are approved, that
all concreting labour plant and equipment are ready, that standby plant and labour are present,
that access is arranged for trucks, that lighting arrangements have been made when necessary
and that curing arrangements are ready.
e) Before approval to concrete is given the checks described above shall be carried out and
recorded on the check list proforma example shown in Chapter 19.
In order to ensure that specified time constraints are met for placing batched concrete it is
essential to have a concreting record system whereby tickets are issued with each truck load
of concrete. These should record the following information:
o Ticket No.
o Truck No.
o Time of start of batching
o Time of completion of batching
o Quantity of water added
o Quantity & Type of admixture added if any
o Quantity of concrete batched
o Time of arrival of truck at site
o Slump test result both at batching plant & placement point
o Time of start of placement
o Time of finish of placement
o Whether cubes taken
The information shall be transferred onto pour summary sheets which shall thus show the full
concreting history of the pour.
Examples of proformas for concrete delivery tickets and pour summary sheets are shown in
Chapter 19.
b) Placing of Concrete
Inspection shall ensure that specified procedures are followed with respect to:
a) Curing
It is most important for Quality Assurance of durability of the finished product after
placement that the concrete is cured properly. The purpose of curing is to prevent water loss
by evaporation from the wet concrete thus causing shrinkage cracking with consequent
detriment to durability and concrete cover protection to reinforcement.
Curing should be applied as soon as possible after finishing the concrete top surface. It should
be applied piecemeal to prevent areas being left exposed and drying out. The most rigorous
inspection of this item is required to instill correct curing practices.
It should be noted that adequate curing is most difficult in hot, dry, windy conditions.
Alternate wetting and drying out of fresh concrete is severely damaging and must not be
allowed. If specified, concreting shall not be allowed when the calculated rate of evaporation
exceeds the specified limits.
Curing compounds are not to be trusted to ensure adequate curing. For these to work properly
all factors must be 100% satisfactory and this is very difficult to achieve. Problems result
from old stock, poor storage, mixing difficulties, loss of pigments on transfer from barrels to
dispensers, faulty sprays/dispensers, blocked jets and so on. Even in favorable conditions,
there can be wide range of performance of curing compounds.
The recommended curing practice is hessian covers constantly wetted with potable water,
aided by plastic / polythene sheeting to reduce the rate of evaporation. Timber battens to
secure covering are essential, especially in windy conditions.
Inspections shall be made frequently in the first 24 hours concreting for early shrinkage
cracking. This is evidence that curing is inadequate. Thereafter daily checks shall be made for
evidence of cracking.
b) Finish
The standard of finish shall be inspected for compliance with the Specification.
1. The standard deviation, mean values, minimum strengths shall be plotted for the specified
numbers of results/time intervals against minimum specified values.
3. Where the strength fails to comply then the non-compliance procedure described in
Section 17.3 shall be observed.
11.6.5 Underwater Concreting
Method for concreting under water is well known and shall not be repeated here. Reference should
be made to specialist literature on this subject. For Quality Assurance of concrete placed
underwater the following procedures shall be followed.
Method Statement
The Contractor’s shall present a detailed method statement covering the following points:
a) Mix design
b) Method of placement
c) Sequence of placing with sketches
d) Verification.
Trials
The method of concreting underwater shall be the subject of a full-scale trial away from the
permanent works. This should entail two or more separate concrete deliveries to the point of
placement to simulate real delay time between batching. The trial shall be carried out so that
complete exposure of the pour is possible to allow close inspection in the dry of the finished work.
This should be broken up and the concrete examined for soundness and extent of cement washout.
Only on completion of satisfactory trials shall the method statement be approved.
Care shall be taken to ensure that the approved method statement is followed exactly. On
exposure, careful inspection shall be made for soundness and extent of cement washing out. Any
areas of leakage indicate unsound concrete and consideration should be given to breaking out and
re-execution of this work.
Concrete batching, placing and slump records shall be kept as for normal concreting operations.
If any deterioration is noticed in spite of protective measures, the same is to be certified before
taking up subsequent operations.
Meeting should be held periodically, preferably on a specific day of month and at a place based on
mutual agreement between the Authority/Project Director, Engineer/Engineers Representative and
the Contractor’s – Authority Engineer Consultant to discuss about project related issues but not
limited to the following salient points.
Immediate action shall be taken by the concerned parties with assistance from Authority wherever
necessary for resolving the issues which may have been the subjects in the meetings.
The minutes of review meeting shall be taken by Project Manager. The minutes of meeting shall
enlist the decisions taken and the actions required to be taken by respective personnel along with
the proposed date for action completion. It should be distributed to all the function participating in
the meeting and nominated ones for any specifications. The status of minutes of previous meeting
shall be taken up during the next subsequent meeting and the progress or delays to be assessed
and remedial suggestions taken.
During the project implementation stage site visits of dignitaries’ high officials of Government,
representative from funding agency etc generally takes place to review the progress, status,
bottlenecks, remedial measures, and action to be taken for the better interest of project.
+ 20mm
1. Subgrade -20mm
2. Sub-base
+ 10 mm
(a) Flexible pavement - 10 mm
The maximum allowable difference between the road surface and underside of a 3 m straight-edge
when placed parallel with, or at right angles to the center line of the road at points decided by the
Engineer shall be
Item Construction Type of Test Frequency of Test Application Quality Standard Remarks
Item Standard
Initial Test Embankment MDD / lab Sample low Low embankment less than 3 m
for approval Subgrade Density (incorporated) - compaction height MDD = 15.2 kN/cum (min)
(borrow/cut Backfill No. of samples as 1S:2720 (Part
soil) directedby - 7) Year
Engineer 1980
Heavy High
compaction Embankment height more than 3 m
1S:2720 MDD = 16.0
(Part- 8) Year kN/cum (min)
1983
Moisture 2 per 3000m3 / 2 IS:2720 (Part
Content tests. – 2) Year
1973
CBR (only 1 per 3000m3/One IS:2720 (Part
subgrade) CBR test (average of – 16) Year
three specimens) 1987
Sieve Analysis 2 per 3000m3 / Each IS:2720 (Part
(sand/grain type to be tested,2 – 4) Year
context) tests. 1985
Liquid Limit & 2 per 3000m3 / Each IS:2720 (Part LL = 50 Max. PI = 25 Max.
Plasticity Limits type to be tested,2 – 5) Year
tests. 1985
Quality Embankment Field dry Embankment: Min 10 i) low i) Compacted to 95% of MDD / lab Acceptance
Control (in Subgrade Destiny (FDD) pits / 3000 m² for compaction density (min) criteria:
field) during Backfill Core cutting each layer 1S:2720 (Part Mean value
construction method Subgrade: Min. 10 - 7) Year ii) Subgrade: Compacted to 97% of is not less
Sand pits / 2000 m² (one 1980 MDD/lab density (min) than
replacement set) for specified
CBR (only for If required site CBR IS:2720 (Part Equal (or) more than Lab CBR By mobile
subgrade) carried out – 16) Year CBR
1987 equipment
Rockfill Gradation 1 no./ single layer of - - To confirm
embankment 500 mm thick the size of
rock material
to class 313.1
Los Angles 40 35 30
Abrasion value
Aggregate Impact 30 27 24
Value
Sodium Sulphate IS: 2386 (Part-5) Maximum 12%
Soundness Loss
Job Mix formula Sieve Analysis 1 Number / IS: 2386 (Part-1) As per IRC para 507.3 Table 500-
(Mix Grading) 400 T 13
Minimum 2
Bituminous Marshall 1 Number / Asphalt Institute As per IRC table 500-11 or 500 19,
Mix stability 400 T Manual MS-2 whichever is applicable
Minimum 2
Test per plant
per day
Ordinary Wearing Asphalt Mixture Temperature Any Time Spreading Temp. Min. 110˚ C:
Quality Coarse and required Mixing Temp. 160˚ C, Rolling
Control Binder Temp. 80-100˚ C
Asphalt content 1 to 2 AASHTO T 170 Asphalt content (+/-) 0.3%
times/day
Gradation 1 to 2 IS: 2386 (Part-3)
times/day
Density Every 1,000 IS: 2386 (Part-3) Degree of Compaction 95%
sq.m.
Asphalt Asphalt Mixture Temperature Any Time Spreading Temp. (110˚ C)
Treated required Compaction Temp. (110˚- 160˚
Base Course C)
Asphalt content 1 to 2 AASHTO T 170 Asphalt content (+/-) 0.3%
times/day
Gradation 1 to 2 IS: 2386 (Part-1)
times/day
Density Every 500 IS: 2386 (Part-3) Degree of Compaction 95%
sq.m.
Check compaction of laid surfacing Compaction shall immediately follow after placing and from lower edge
to ridge laterally,
Initial rolling shall follow paver as close as possible,
Final rolling shall eliminate marks from previous rolling,
Item Class of Kind of Type of Test Frequency of Test Application Quality Standard
Concrete Material Standard
Material M15, M20, Cement Quality of Cement 1 Number for each IS:269, IS:455, Quality Certification
examination M25, M30, source of supply IS:1489, IS:8112 from Production
before the work M35, M40 and IS:12269
and M45 Admixture Quality of Admixture Not contain calcium
chloride
Water Quality of Water IS:456 Not including salt,
acid, alkali, sugar, Veg.
Fine aggregate Sieve analysis IS:2386 (Part 1)
Specific gravity (bulk) IS:2386 (Part 3) Minimum 2.50
Soundness IS:2386 (Part 5)
Water absorption IS:2386 (Part 2)
Deleterious materials and IS:2386 (Part 2)
organic impurities
Coarse Sieve analysis IS:2386 (Part 1)
Aggregate Specific gravity (bulk) IS:2386 (Part 3) Minimum 2.50
Abrasion loss IS:2386 (Part 4) Maximum 30%
Soundness IS:2386 (Part 5)
Alkali aggregate IS:2386 (Part 7)
reactivity
Deleterious materials and IS:2386 (Part 2)
organic impurities
Water absorption IS:2386 (Part 3)
Quality Control M15, M20, Cement Quality of Cement 1 Number for each IS:269, IS:455,
for field sample M25, M30, Admixture Quality of Admixture source of supply IS:1489, IS:8112 Quality Certification
M35, M40 and IS:12269 from Production
and M45
NAME OF LABORATORY:
5 Sulphur content, calculated as SO3, %by Not more than 2.75 When C3A
mass not more than 7%.
NAME OF LABORATORY:
NAME OF LABORATORY:
NAME OF LABORATORY:
PLACE OF TESTS:
Class of Pipe: NP 4
NAME OF LABORATORY:
NAME OF LABORATORY:
In broad terms, for the Quality Assurance of the finished work it is necessary for the materials and
workmanship to comply with the Contract requirements. Non-complying work shall be rejected.
Strict vigilance will be provided by the Consultants on the quality of materials to be used for the
work and also on adequate measures to be adopted to avoid delivery of unsuitable materials. The
Consultants will order for removal or replacement of the unsuitable material brought to site by the
Contractor. The Consultants will perform work-tests regularly to ensure Quality and workmanship
during the process of construction of various items of work both in-situ and in the laboratory in
accordance with IRC/MoRT&H guidelines and Specifications and Contract provision and, if
found any part of work defective or substantial, will instruct the Contractor to rectify or dismantle.
The statement above is true in general terms but special difficulties arise in the case of concrete,
where the non-compliance may only be known after 28-day cube results. In these cases, removal,
re-execution or rectification of the work is usually difficult. Therefore, separate procedures are
laid out below for non-complying concretes.
For quality assurance of the finished work, it is necessary for the materials and workmanship to
fully comply with the work requirement. Non-conforming work has to be dealt with as per
procedures for dealing with non-conformities as per performa F1 of IRC: SP-57 -2000.
15.2.1 Procedures
The procedure for acceptance of finished work for earthworks, formwork, reinforcement,
materials for concrete, pre-stressing and bridge finishing works are straightforward and shall be as
follows:
a) Regular and special testing, logging of results and inspections shall determine compliance or
non-compliance.
b) Any non-compliance shall without delay be notified to the Contractor. This shall be done both
verbally and in writing by the following means:
Return of the Request for Inspection form signed "not approved" with the reasons for
rejection stated.
Issue of a Site Instruction or Site Works Order or letter stating the facts and confirming
that the works are not acceptable for inclusion in the permanent works.
c) The Contractor shall be asked to state his exact proposals for rectification and it shall be
ensured that the faulty work is made good and retested or inspected.
15.2.2 Records
It is mandatory that all instances of work outside the Specification are recorded in writing to the
Contractor. This ensures that:
From the above information, the Supervision Consultant shall review the Contractors
superintendence and take action where necessary to improve matters.
From increases or decreases in the number of first time approvals, the improvement or
deterioration in Contractors performance can be monitored.
The primary means by which Quality Assurance shall be achieved is by the procedures described
in Section 11.6.4 of Chapter 11.
a) The Contractor shall be notified without delay verbally and in writing by the following
means:
Return of the Request for Inspection signed "not approved" with the reasons for rejection
stated.
Issue of a Site Instruction or Site Works Order or letter stating the facts and confirming
that the works are not approved.
b) Approval to carry out concreting of a similar nature shall be withheld.
c) The Contractor shall be asked for his proposals to rectify the non-compliance which may
involve re-submission of materials, new trial mixes, revised method statement.
d) The acceptance or rejection of any unapproved concrete work shall be referred to the
Supervision Consultant.
e) When satisfied with the measures taken to ensure future compliance the Supervision
Consultant shall confirm approval to continue concrete for permanent works.
In order to provide assurance against strength failures the procedures described in Section 12.6.4
of Chapter 12 shall be observed. In the event of cube failures, the non-compliance procedures
described in the Specification shall be followed. Special situations, however, arise, such as,
strength of concrete, where non-conformance may only be known after sometime, e.g., after 28
Where the required finish is not attained then the non-compliance procedure described in the
Specification shall be followed.
The audit program shall assign qualified personnel to perform such audits and define the
procedures and frequency of audits, the method of reporting the findings and recommendations
and the means for corrective actions and their re-audit.
16.1 Programme
The Senior Engineer (Quality Assurance) shall establish, document and implement a programme
for audits which shall objectively evaluate the adequacy of the functions, systems and procedures
as referenced in this Manual.
Audits shall be carried out by appropriately trained personnel who are not directly responsible for
the area being audited
Audits shall be performed in accordance with documented audit procedures and/or checklists
which identify essential characteristics.
Management responsible for the area audited shall review, agree, and correct deficiencies
revealed in the documented audited results. All actions taken to correct deficiencies shall be re-
audited to verify compliance and a close-out report issued.
The scope and depth of the Quality Audits shall be determined by the Project Manager and Senior
Engineer (Quality Assurance).
Note: Different proformae according to the various categories mentioned above have been
referred from IRC Special Publication. These typical proformae have been adopted on some of the
work sites in India to have an idea of the format. The proformae are indicative and may be
modified, augmented or supplemented according to the needs of particular work. The typical
proformae for the road projects will be as per formats given on pages 53 to 100 of IRC: SP-57-
2000 whereas typical proformae for the road bridge projects will be as per formats given on pages
from 47 to 81 of IRC: SP-47-1998.
Drawing Rev. Title Drawn Date No. of Status of For Date action Status of Date
Number By Received copies Drawings action Completed Drawing Superseded
Issue By
Issued to
Issue Date
Issue Codes
1 = Preliminary
2 = for Information Issued By:
3 = for Comment
4 = for Approval Date:
5 = Tender Drawing
6 = Construction Drawing Comments:
Ref. SI No. Detailed Description of Revision Related Page No. Appd. Date
of Document Requirement Document
Location:
Part of Works:
Category of Work:
Remarks:
Name: Name:
THE WORKS DESCRIBED ABOVE HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVAL OF THE
WORK IS HEREBY GRANTED* / WITHHELD FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS* :
(* Delete as applicable)
Received: Signed:
Name: Name:
Sr. No.
Sub Location:
Location:
Part of Works:
Category of Work:
Remarks
Contractor Consultant
Request sent by: Request received by:
Time: Time:
Date: Date:
Signature: Signature:
Received Signed
To: Date:
Project Manager:
Package No.:
Item of Work:
Location:
Observation of Consultant:
(if approval is asked for, write clearly approved or not approved showing reason)
(if used for any other purpose write Not Applicable, NA)
Signed: Signed:
B Sub Base
1 Underlying bed ready for receiving sub Yes No
base material
2 Approved material used on bed Yes No
3 Blending of different ingredients Ok Not Ok
4 Line, Level, Grade Ok Not Ok
5 Layer Depth Ok Not Ok
6 Compaction Ok Not Ok
E Pre-Concreting Stage
1 Name of Structure
2 Structural Element
3 Concrete Grade
4 Proportion
5 Concrete Quantity (theoretical)
6 Cement Bag No.
Form Work
7 Type
8 Period of Retention
9 Line, Squareness Ok Not Ok
10 Level, Slope Ok Not Ok
Location:
Location:
Location:
Location:
CHECKLIST
PRE-CONCRETING CHECK LIST
Location:
Component of Structure:
Particulars Remarks
Yes No
Materials
1 Sufficient material available at actual position of concreting as
per requirement for the concerned quantity of concrete.
2 Material is to be used for concreting are tested and found
satisfactory as per following tests.
Water & Admixture:
a) pH
b) Chloride
c) Sulphate
Sand:
a) Gradation / silt content
b) Water absorption / Moisture content
Coarse Aggregate:
a) Gradation
b) % of water absorption
c) Mix design adjusted for actual values of moisture content &
water absorption & gradation.
Date:
Location of Pour:
Class of Concrete: Truck No.:
Batching started: hrs. Batching Finished: Hrs.
Quality Batched: m³
Quality Water: lintre (gross)
Signed: Signed:
Name: Name:
Signed: Signed:
Name: Name:
Date:
Lorry Number
Ticket Number
Grade of Concrete
Time Batched
Quantity Batched
Cumulative
Total Batched
Water Content
Slump/mm
(time tested)
Quantity Placed
Time Placed
Cumulative Total
Quantity Rejected
Reason Rejected
Cubes Taken
Concrete Temp
Remarks: Signed:
(Delays, Weather etc) Name:
Date:
1. STRUCTURE :
2. OCA TION :
3. GRADE OF CONCRETE :
4. QUANTITY OF POUR :
5. CEMENT REQUIRED :
7. FORM WORK :
8. REINFORCEMENT :
Location:
Date of pour:
Curing: Method
Start Date: Finish Date :
Checks:
Date
S or NS
Whether
Minor defects
Major defects
Cracks : No cracks:
Spalling : No spalling:
Spalling:
Remarks:
Location
QUALITY FOLLOW-UP
Slump (mm)
7 day (kg/cm²)
Signed
Name
Date
DATA TRANSFER
Signed
Name
Project:
Location:
It is confirmed that the temporary works shown on the drawings listed above have:
1. Been designed with the professional care by a qualified engineer in accordance with BS 5975
2. Erected in accordance with drawings listed above and approved method statement.
I am satisfied that the temporary works can now be loaded with a view to ensuring safety of personnel and
the well being of the permanent works.
Signed:
It is confirmed that the design, drawings, method statement and erection of the temporary works shown on
the drawings listed above have been checked with due professional care by a qualified engineer with a
view to ensuring safety of personnel and the wellbeing of the permanent works. Consent is given to load
the said temporary works.
Signed:
Name:
FOUNDATIONS
Excavation
4 Check the quality of sand, coarse aggregates and cement as per Checked / Not Checked
specifications
The above work has been executed as per laid down specifications of the contract & may be inspected and
approved. Supporting documents are enclosed.
Engineer
In-charge
Date: Contractor
Engineer-in-charge
Consultant
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineer-in-charge
Consultant
Chainage: From To
Straight / Curve
Chainage
Left Toe
Right Toe
Communication to Contractor :
Start of next layer : Yes / No
Action taken by Contractor :
Chainage Top Width (m) R.L. at Left Toe R.L. at Centre R.L. at Right Toe
(m) Required Actual Required Actual Required Actual Required Actual
L.S. R.L. L.S. R.L. L.S. R.L.
3. Field Dry Density Determination Maximum Dry Density (gm/cc) Mean Field Dry Density (gmlcc)
Compaction Specified: Relative Compaction Achieved:
1. Telephone
2. Power
3. Effluent Line
4. Storm Water Drain
5. Others
Chainage: Date:
Soil:
Total Qty
for Day
Summary Embankment Sub- GSB WMM
grade
Qty. till
Yesterday
Total Qty
for Day
Qty upto
date
Sample Near by Gravel Sand Silt LL PI MDD OMC CBR FSI Remar
Detail Chainage & ks
Clay
Cumulative Rainfall mm
Date:
Chainage Top Width (m) R.L. at Left Toe R.L. at Centre R.L. at Right Toe
(m) Required Actual Required Actual Required Actual Required Actual
L.S. R.L. L.S. R.L. L.S. R.L.
FORM - 26
AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION REPORT
FORM - 27
DAILY REPORT
Date:
Time:
Working Hours
Name of Plant
Sl. Remarks
/ Machinery Nos Run Break Down Idle Total Conc. Metal
Plant
1 ORU B.P. - I
2 ORU B.P. - II
3 Liebherr
4 PUG Mill
Machinery
1 WL Loader (H)
2 WL Loader
(ECC)
3 Dozer
4 L & T 580
Case
5 Transit Mixer
6 Dumper
7 Tatra
FORM - 28
BATCHING PLANT - DAILY PROGRESS REPORT
THRU:- Date:- / /
Consumption of Materials in Kg
Completion
Description
Admixture
per m³
Metal Kgs
Unit Nos.
Concrete
Rate, of
Pour m³
Starting
Qty. m³
Average
Card
Concret
Time
Time
Sand
Lts.
Grade
Cement
No.
Cement
SI
/ hrs.
10mm 20mm 40mm
Pour
in kg
of
down down down C.S. R.S.
Cement stock inSilo unit No. A M.T.: This month total Qty. : M³
FORM - 29
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
MATERIALS - LABORATORY TESTS
Results
No. of
Sr. Type of Test Failed &
Tests done Passed
rectified
1 Aggregate G-I
15 2389 (I) Grading
15 2380 (V) Flakiness
A.I.V.
2 Aggregate G-II Grading
15 2380 (I) Flakiness
A.I.V.
3 Aggregate G-III
15 2380 (I) Grading
Flakiness
A.I.V.
4 Sub-grade FDD
OMC & MDD /
sacked CBR
5 Inverted Choke - Grading
6 Binding Material - LL & PI
7 Excavated Soil- MDD / OMC /
FDD
Excavated soil CBR Shoulder
8 SDBC Grading
Flakiness
A.I.V.
Water Absorption
Bitumen Content
Stripping
Stability Flow
Quality binder
Rel compaction
9 Diversion Embankment Soil- FDD
10 Borrow Area LL/PI
OMC + CBR
N.M.C.
11 BUSG (Course key aggregate) Grading
Flakiness
A.I.V.
Sand Content
12 LBM & BM Grading
Flakiness
A.I.V.
B.C.
Results
No. of
Sr. Type of Test Failed &
Tests done Passed rectified
Stripping
Water absorption
Relative compactions
13 DBM Grading
Flakiness
A.I.V.
ECD.
Water absorption
Stripping
Stability Flow
Bitumen Content
Quality binder
Relative compaction
14 Embankment Shoulder / FDD
15 Raising FDD
16 Bricks Water absorption /
comp.
17 Aggregate Gradation (10 mm +
20 mm)
18 Sand Gradation
Finess modulus
FORM - 30
LAB AND FIELD TESTS
Earthwork Subgrade
N.M.C.
Sieve Analysis
Proctor test
Field Density
LL / PL
C.B.R.
Sub-Base
Gradation
C.B.R.
Field Density
LL / PL
Sieve Analysis
Proctor test
WMM
Gradation
PI of Binding Material
Flakiness Index
Concrete
Cube-Strength (28 days)
Agg. Gradation
Workability
Aggregates
Flakiness Index
A.I.V.
Water Absorption
Cement
Consistency
Initial Setting time
Final Setting time
Cube Strength (28 days)
FORM - 31
CALIBRATION REPORTS OF MAJOR TESTING INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENTS
FORM - 32
CALIBRATION OF SAND (As per IS 2720 Part 28)
OBSERVATION TABLE
Determination No.
S. No. Description
1 2 3
1 Weight of sand in cone
(of pouring cylinder) W2gm
FORM - 33
Messrs
Date
Ref
TESTING REPORT
Contract Month
Sampling
Sieve Analysis
Moisture Content
Storage Bins
FORM - 34
Messrs
Date
Ref
TESTING REPORT
Contract Month
Sampling
Sieve Analysis
Organic Impurities
Flakiness Index
Moisture Content
Storage Bins
FORM - 35
PERMIT TO WORK ON
Area / Location :
Requested by Approved by
Name Name
Designation Designation
Date & Time Date & Time
Authorised Signature
Name:
Designation:
Time: Date:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have completed job on the above equipment and we certify that
Authorised Signature
Name:
Designation:
Time: Date:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment Energised at (Time) (Date)
Authorised Signature
Name:
Designation:
Time: Date: