You are on page 1of 2

The Ideal Team Player: How to Recognize and Cultivate the Three

Essential Virtues: A Leadership Fable


by Patrick Lencioni
John Wiley & Sons (US). (c) 2016. Copying Prohibited.

Reprinted for Angelo Guevara, Lockheed Martin Corporation


angelo.a.guevara@lmco.com
Reprinted with permission as a subscription benefit of Skillport,
http://skillport.books24x7.com/

All rights reserved. Reproduction and/or distribution in whole or in part in electronic,paper or


other forms without written permission is prohibited.
The Ideal Team Player: How to Recognize and Cultivate the Three Essential Virtues: A Leadership Fable

The History of the Model


Back in 1997, a group of colleagues and I started our management consulting firm, The Table Group. Because we had worked together in a
department I led in a previous company, we had an easy time agreeing on our core values: humble, hungry, and smart. These were the
principles that guided our department previously, and we wanted to maintain them in our new firm. So we committed to hiring only people who
embodied these concepts and to avoid making any operational or strategic decisions that violated them.
In the consulting work we did with clients, we not only helped leaders build better teams, but we also assisted them in clarifying everything from
their strategies, tactics, roles, responsibilities, meetings, and, most important for this conversation, values. In the course of discussing values,
clients would inevitably ask us about ours at The Table Group.
Now, we didn’t publicize humble, hungry, and smart. They were nowhere to be found on our website or in any of o ur collateral. We felt that as
long as we understood and stayed true to them, no one else really needed to understand them. However, when clients asked us, we felt
compelled to share them. And when we explained humble, hungry, and smart, something strange would often happen: clients would declare
that they were going to adopt those values, too.
Of course, we would immediately protest and explain that an organization’s values can’t be copied or borrowed; they need to be true
reflections of the unique history and culture of that organization. We often attributed our clients’ interest in our values to expediency, or perhaps
even laziness—their desire to grab the first set of positive-sounding words, so that they could declare their search for values over. Well, we
eventually discovered we were wrong about their motivation and that there was a logical explanation why our clients wanted to adopt humble,
hungry, and smart.
First, our firm’s culture was all about teamwork, both in what we did with clients and in how we tried to behave internally, because we had
always vowed to practice what we preached. Second, virtually all the companies that engaged our firm were already interested in teamwork,
which makes sense given that we were best known for the book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. So, it shouldn’t have been terribly
surprising to think that our hiring criteria and core values would make up the very definition of a team player, even if we didn’t realize it at the
time.
Once we made this realization, we started to look at the relevance of humble, hungry, and smart for other organizations in a different way.
Those words weren’t necessarily core values, but they were critical hiring and development criteria for any organization that wanted teamwork
to be central to its operations.

To make sure we weren’t deluding ourselves, we asked the question, Could a person fully practice the five behaviors at the heart of
teamwork (see the model on page 214) if he or she didn’t buy into the idea of being humble, hungry, and smart?

The answer was a resounding no.


A person who is not humble will not be able to be vulnerable and build trust, making them unable to engage in honest conflict and hold others
accountable. And they’ll have a hard time committing to decisions that don’t serve their interests. A colleague who lacks hunger will not be
willing to engage in uncomfortable conflict, hold peers accountable for their behaviors, or do whatever it takes to achieve results, choosing
instead to take an easier path. And a person who is not smart about people will most likely create unnecessary problems in the entire
teambuilding process, especially when it comes to tactfully engaging in productive conflict and holding people accountable for behaviors.
After reviewing, discussing, and using the model in our own firm and seeing our clients try to adopt it in theirs, we became convinced that any
leader who wants to make teamwork a reality should find and/or develop people who are humble, hungry, and smart. To do all of this, leaders
need to understand how these qualities work together and what happens when one or more of them are missing.

Page 2 / 2
Reprinted for QO4WH/134413, Lockheed Martin Corporation John Wiley & Sons (US), Patrick Lencioni (c) 2016, Copying Prohibited

You might also like