Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CrossMark
View Export
Online Citation
I. INTRODUCTION same thickness were set in a target holder, which was tilted
30° against the substrate holder. Silicon wafers from
Pulsed-laser deposition 共PLD兲 is a successful method for
4 to 8 in. in diameter could be set in the substrate holder.
II. EXPERIMENT
Figure 1 shows a schematic picture explaining the concept
of our method. An incident beam of a KrF excimer laser
共 = 248 nm兲 was set to be parallel to a face-down substrate
holder and a 3 ⫻ 12 cm2 ceramic target with thickness of
8 mm for HfO2, and a 3 ⫻ 10 cm2 target for SBT with the
FIG. 1. Schematic top and side views of a large-area pulsed-laser-deposition
a兲
Electronic mail: shigeki.sakai@aist.go.jp system.
903 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 25„4…, Jul/Aug 2007 0734-2101/2007/25„4…/903/5/$23.00 ©2007 American Vacuum Society 903
904 Sakai et al.: Large-area pulsed-laser deposition of dielectric and ferroelectric thin films 904
FIG. 2. Contour map of HfO2 film thickness without the Si substrate rota-
tion. The numbers labeled at contour lines represent the deposition rate in
units of Å/min.
of X = 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, and 11.5 cm. Here, each value assigned deposition time was calculated for each X position for real-
for X is the distance from a target holder edge, X0 in Fig. 1, izing a uniform film thickness over the entire area of the
to the X position. Since the projection of this edge to the x wafers. Both curves decreasing and increasing monotoni-
axis provides x = 0, each X corresponds to the x coordinate on cally, such as those for X = 4.5 and 11.5 cm in Fig. 3, are
the x axis. The relationship between the deposition rate 共nm/ necessary to calculate the best deposition times for obtaining
min兲 and the distance from the wafer center 共R兲 is shown in uniform-film thickness.
Fig. 3. There might be an assumption that a deposition at an Figure 4 shows the thickness-distribution result of
X would provide a thickness distribution with its maximum 42-nm-thick HfO2 deposited on an 8 in. Si wafer. The thick-
at R = X, but actually the deposition rates monotonically de- ness of over 300 points with the interval 共⌬x and ⌬y兲 of
creased at X = 4.5 cm and increased at 11.5 cm as R in- 10 mm on the entire wafer was characterized. Figures 4共a兲
creased. The curve at X = 4.5 cm can be understood as fol- and 4共b兲 are the contour map and the R dependence, respec-
lows: At R = 0, some constant amount is always deposited. tively. The standard deviation was 1.3% of the averaged
On the other hand, on a point in the R = 4.5 cm circumfer- thickness, 42 nm. Figure 5 shows the thickness distribution
ence, the rate becomes very large when the point comes near of 6-nm-thick HfO2 deposited on a 6 in. Si wafer. The tech-
the laser-hit position, but very small when the point stays far nology of this thickness range is significant for applications
from the hit position. As a result of the rate distribution of to the next-generation metal-insulator-semiconductor 共MIS兲
Fig. 2 共FWHM⬇ 5 cm along x兲, the average deposition rate field-effect transistors 共FETs兲 and nonvolatile metal-
at R = 0 was larger than the point in the R = 4.5 cm circum- ferroelectric-insulator-semiconductor memory FETs. The
ference. At the intermediate X = 6.5 and 8.5 cm, the rate distribution was measured on over 300 points with ⌬x = ⌬y
maxima exist in the estimated R range. = 7.5 mm. The standard deviation was 1.6% of the averaged
By using the deposition rate curves at the four X points in thickness. The X positions used for this deposition on the
Fig. 3, a deposition on an 8 in. Si wafer was performed. A 6 in. wafer were 3.8, 5.0, 7.0, and 11.0 cm.
FIG. 8. Capacitance vs R for the Pt/ HfO2 / Si MIS diodes on a 6 in. Si wafer.
1
S. Sakai and R. Ilangovan, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 25, 369 共2004兲. 197–198, 169 共2002兲.
2 6
R. E. Muenchusen, K. M. Hubbard, S. Foltyn, R. C. Estler, and C. J. M. Lackner, Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 1439 共2005兲.
Jenkins, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 578 共1990兲. 7
S. Sakai, registered program 共No. H16PRO-295兲 in National Institute of
3
C. N. Afonso, R. Serna, and F. Catalina, Appl. Surf. Sci. 46, 249 共1990兲. Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.
4 8
S. Boughaba, M. Islam, J. P. McCaffrey, G. I. Sproule, and M. J. Graham, S. Sakai, M. Takahashi, and R. Ilangovan, Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron
Thin Solid Films 371, 119 共2000兲. Devices Meet. 2004, 915.
5 9
R. Dietsch, T. Holz, D. Weinssbach, and R. Scholz, Appl. Surf. Sci. B.-Y. Tsui and H.-W. Chang, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 10119 共2003兲.