Professional Documents
Culture Documents
First of all, it's a fact, Grady McMurtry is completely correct. The present day policies of the OTO are completely
wrong and have little legal much less fraternal merit. If an OTO member quotes from this book they are not in
violation of their Oaths because initiates can not be held accountable for what is common knowledge amongst non
members and which is knowledge already found in the public domain of libraries around the world. Any claim
otherwise shows an insipid or immature knowledge of how 'Fraternal Oaths' work and throwing the phase 'violation'
around as if to imply karmic retribution is little more than a mundane threat of spiritual blackmail or intimidation in
order to control one's membership on this plane. It is hardly magickal or fraternal, much less Thelemic behavior.
The behavior reeks of the control freak mentality rumored to exist within the Black Brotherhood. Lets be honest.
There is grave danger under foot for the OTO. As any true magician will attest, an Oath assumes a variety of forms.
Probably the most famous Oath is the silly little ditty of 'Crossing one's heart and hoping to die.' I can go on and on
showing numerous examples of how Oaths are used in society to force individuals to tell the Truth but it would
serve no purpose. The only other type of Oath I'd like to point out is a Magickal Oath because it's often confused
with the fraternal type. A Magickal Oath is something which binds a magician forever to its intent and is an
affirmation between the magician and his Universe. It never includes a third party as do Fraternal Oaths. The latter is
designed to invoke a dire medieval type of punishment on any individual should they violate their Word as sworn
before the Order and its membership. This type of Oath has arguably not kept up with the times and although such
might have been practices at one time, it has been reduced to unenforceable gibberish. In standard Masonry it is
acknowledge that the Oath or Solemn Obligation is probably the single most misunderstood aspect of the entire
ritual. I can attest from what I have seen within the Ordo Templi Orientis that their understanding of how such
works is beneath that of even Masonry. What most fail to realize is that a Fraternal Oath is always a double-edged
sword or two-sided, fifty-fifty and the karma goes to he who violates it first, the Order or the individual. No
organization should ever be so presumptuous or arrogant as to believe that it is karmically exempt from its own
actions. First of all, when a person takes an initiation he or she does not sign their life away. You might ask, “But
isn't a Fraternal Oath taken for life?” I can only answer, yes, and no. It all depends whether or not the individual
remains a member of the fraternity or if he or she quits or was expelled. Obviously once outside the fraternity one is
no longer bound by these archaic Oaths. This in itself should give you a hint as to the true power of a Fraternal Oath.
Its only power lies in the fact that members within the structure give and in return they get specific annuities as
promised by the Order's written tenets, it's all fifty-fifty. If the OTO violates its written tenets nor bothers to enforce
its own Rules, Regulations & Bylaws then its membership automatically becomes free of the Oaths and Obligations
which they have sworn to that Order. Its either all or nothing for both sides in regards to Fraternal Oaths. Crowley
felt this way regarding that which he swore within the Sanctuaries of The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.
They failed him, not the other way around. The Initiations had become worthless. Members were elevated up for
little else than their worldly prosperity and in many cases, simply due to whom they knew. Friends of the influential
were getting away crimes which under normal circumstances warranted immediate expulsion. The Order was
reduced to little more than the desires of a 'boys-club' on this plane rather than the aspirations of anything higher to
which it had professed in writing. The bottom line is that the OTO should be very careful when it makes accusations
against its members regarding 'magickal or karmic retribution' that such is completely justifiable. Karma is a bitch if
not an astral termite gnawing away at one's foundation. It will inevitably collapse one's reality in on itself. Yes, the
OTO should take heed of the Golden Dawn's downfall. The misunderstanding of their Oaths was its first step toward
downfall. Regardless of the above, I defy anyone to come up with an Oath sworn in any organization or fraternity
throughout the history of the world, as an example, which will prove that initiates can not discuss things already
published over a lengthy period of time. Yes, all OTO initiates swear a solemn obligation or Oath never to “inviolate
the secrets and mysteries of Our Order” (11) but do OTO members even know what inviolate means? It means that
you can not 'profane' your teachings. Is talking about them with honesty, sincerity and with an open heart and mind,
profaning them? No. The regular Masons do it all the time and they even write about their beliefs. Yes, it could also
be argued that OTO initiates take an Oath which has them “Solemnly promise and swear never to reveal” (12) what
3
they learn within the confines of the Initiation Chamber of “this Most Holy Order.” (13) However, let's be honest
and stop the game of petty denial. The OTO needs to remember that their Oaths, like every fraternity, were written
with the intent that the material would hopefully remain 'SECRET.' It hasn't. The Order needs to get over this fact
and move on, as did the Masons when they discovered that their rites had ultimately been revealed. They didn't
change their Oaths or rituals. In fact they still tell their candidates not to reveal what they've learn within the
chambers even though such is published everywhere. The Masons know a fraternity is 'more' than its rituals and, as
any magician will attest, simply having the material does not warrant an individual will be initiated or understand
the Mysteries. You must go through the actual rites in an earthing process which includes specific verbal teachings.
The other more serious question which we need to ask ourselves is this. Should we be putting the full blame on
Francis King for revealing the OTO secrets or on the people who use and resell his book? We know Aleister
Crowley, himself, our own forefather, gave copies of all the OTO material to Gerald Yorke who was not even an
OTO Initiate and who, in turn, put them in a public University for all of humanity to view. Thanks to Crowley most
of the information about our secret rituals can now be browsed through with impunity by outsiders, to be
photocopied and to have as many notes taken from them as anyone wishes. It is a fact, his actions indirectly allowed
Francis King to publish his book. After all, King got the rituals formerly owned by the collector G.H.Brooke, who in
turn, somehow got them from, as King points out, Frater Volo Intelligere or Gerald Yorke. However, there is
another possibility we should consider. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to realize that Aleister Crowley acting as the
Outer Head of the Order of OTO was in charge of making Order policies. He must have made a conscious decision
or affirmation that these manuscripts no longer had to be kept totally 'secret' or inclusively by OTO members. If not,
he violated his own Oaths. Since he was a magician, greater than most of us, I personally doubt that he would have
made such a blunder as the latter. So what does this tell us? Are we to assume Crowley declassify all the
manuscripts while he was Head of the Order if not in writing then by his actions as OHO? Even if the present OTO
leadership has reversed Crowley's decisions, or disagrees with the above assessment and wants everything now
secret, the cat, thanks to the Great Beast, is out of the bag. Furthermore, some of the Upper Degree OTO Grade
Papers like Liber CCCLXVII, Liber XXIV and Liber CDXIV which were written by Crowley were published by
Theodore Reuss in the German Oriflamme and distributed for anyone to read. This occurred back in 1914 while
Ruess was still acting as Head of the OTO. So what does this imply? Or is it because they were published in German
that we should considered the secrets still 'concealed' in the English speaking world? If so, how hypocritical and
ludicrous is this? Now don't get me wrong. I'm not advocating the total 'openness' of our rites or Grade Papers
simply because they're published or found in libraries and Universities worldwide. I'm simply advocating fairness
for our fraternal brothers and sisters of the Rights normally afforded to outsiders. That is where all this is leading. In
other words, the OTO needs to carefully rethink its position and policies regarding Francis King's book and stop the
present day witch hunting amongst its own membership of those who sell this book or quote from it. On the lowest
mundane level the leadership of the OTO should reflect upon a simple analogy -- there are words in psychology for
parents who believe they have the right to repeatedly beat their children for something which every other parent in
world believe is OK for a child to do -- it's called abuse. Furthermore, regarding members quoting from this book,
since the OTO admits it is legally subject to the Laws of The United States of America first and not its own Rules,
Regulations & Bylaw, it should always consider the actions of members who quote from The Secret Rituals of the
OTO subject to the guidelines laid out by the Fair Use Copyright Act, as does the US Government, rather than
holding members accountable for the violation of their Oaths with threats of expulsion for revealing 'Trade Secrets.'
Or better yet, does the OTO believe it is above the Law? Besides, is it fair that people outside the OTO are
privileged by Law to quote and use this book freely when its own membership can not? Trying to eliminate King's
book every time it surfaces is very noble but plain silly. You'll never be able to do it and not only will this guarantee
the book's survival but its rarity will force its value up. If the book costs more, those who pay extreme prices will
keep the book in their collections as something sacred. The book will never again be 'casually discarded.' It's
common sense. If you want a book to survive in libraries worldwide then make a fuss over it. Yes, it may be deemed
illegal to republish King's book but this does not imply that existing copies can not be used as a source of quotes or
that the original book is restricted from resale. There are many Crowley books published prior to the OTO's claim of
copyright ownership which the OTO has absolutely no legal ground to stop from being resold on the used book
market. This includes The Secret Rituals of the OTO. No United States Court has ever ordered the original printing
of this book to be burned, destroyed, forbid its resale or it's use under our Fair Use Copyright Regulations. Only
'new' printings are deemed illegal and that is not be because a US Court has stated such. It's because a new edition
would contain manuscripts, or material, proven to be owned by the OTO which this fraternity has no intention of
now giving permission to republish. Which I totally agree. No organization to date has ever successfully argued or
convinced a US Court to begin banning any and all use of information already published, especially over a lengthy
period of time as with the information previously released in The Secret Rituals of the OTO over twenty-five years
ago. Such a request would be laughed out of a Court of Law because it's totally unenforceable. I have also been told
by an EC Member of the OTO that it is no longer acceptable to sell used copies of either Liber AGAPE vel C vel
AZOTH, Sub Figvra 100 or De Arte Magica because these are considered OTO Grade Papers. Both of these have
4
appeared in pamphlets numerous times. If you've got a copy of either of these you should hold onto them. The resale
price on the used market should soar thanks to the OTO. This also implies that another book edited and introduced
by Francis King entitled Crowley on Christ (14) will also become rare and as valuable as Secret Rituals of the OTO.
This is mainly because, as King points out, “The only omission from (Secret Rituals) is De Arte Magica, a
commentary on Liber Agape, a work which outlines the inmost secret of the O.T.O. and is to be found in the Secret
Rituals of the O.T.O. For the sake of completeness De Arte Magica is published as an appendix to this book,
Crowley on Christ.” (15) However, what I don't understand is that if the OTO is trying to keep these two pieces
from surfacing then why did Frater Hymenaeus Beta give permission for De Arte Magica to be published in Portable
Darkness? (16) However, Grady did the same thing when he gave me permission to publish and distribute this piece
while I was Lodge Master back in 1980. (17) But whats up all of a sudden with no selling used copies of this piece?
Anyway, regardless of such, all these books and pamphlets are subject to the same laws as is Secret Rituals and
although the OTO may not like it, such is life. However, King was wrong on one account. De Arte Magica is not the
only omission from Secret Rituals. Earlier I mentioned how Grady claimed that he could not endorse the publication
because a so-called '9th° section' was not included. If Grady only knew that after his death one of his 'trusted friends'
in Berkeley would photocopy this document from his files, which is entitled IX° Emblems and Modes of Use, and
then send it off to another friend who would end up publishing it, he'd be rolling over in his grave. Where am I
going with all these ramblings? If you ask my advice, the greatest danger the OTO presently faces is not that
someone will reveal already published secrets by quoting from or reselling Francis King's book or similar pieces.
It'll come from one of its own Initiates who has been suspended, expelled and threatened with lawsuits, who'll get a
good lawyer and counter sue the Order for deformation of character, slander and being ostracized amongst the
Thelemic communities of his peers with whom he or she has spent their entire life pursuing. That's where the real
damage lies. It'll be due to the Order's callous if not senseless and mindless actions which produces an unwarranted
loss, either mentally, spiritually, emotionally or even financially to an innocent person over something so stupid as a
book which was published in 1973. Yes, you'll always find some stooge within OTO who'll argue that my above
comments about members counter suing the OTO warrants unFraternal conduct and should never be advised or even
suggested. They'll even quote Liber CI, An Open Letter To Those Who May Wish To Join The Order (18) the
Seventh House under section No.25 where it states “Lawsuits between members of the Order are absolutely
forbidden, on pain of immediate expulsion.” On the other hand, I would like to point out, no one from a Minerval to
a IXth Degree, no matter what position they hold within the Order, is exempt from the policies laid out in Liber CI if
such a book is going to be quoted as if gospel. Therefore it could be said that any OTO leader who makes a 'threat of
lawsuit against another member' also violates the policies laid out in Liber CI. However, the OTO leadership will
argue that their threats are for the 'good of the Order' and are therefore exempt from the policies laid out in Liber CI.
Further claiming that a lawsuit would only be instituted after said member has been expelled from the Order. In their
mind this resolves the above issue about “Lawsuits between members of the Order are absolutely forbidden”
because the individual would no longer an OTO Initiate. This sounds all well and good but it also frees up the
member and enables them to counter sue the OTO for every penny it has if they feel they've been 'unjustifiably
wronged' amongst Thelemic circles. Lawsuits of this nature have been filed against every organization from The
Boy Scouts to Scientology by people who have been thrown out or harassed unjustifiably and most win their case or
are settled out of Court. Regardless of the above comments, most of what is written within Liber CI has never been
established nor put into practice amongst OTO branches. Mentioning any part of it as if it were 'official policy' is
simply another form of intimidation. It always befuddles me why it is condoned as accepted 'fraternal' protocol. It's
great that OTO wants to dig-up everything about its past, document wise, but it must realize its either all or nothing.
A fraternity can not 'pick & choose' obscure passages from ancient manuscripts simply to prove its present day
point. As an example, a good lawyer could ask if Liber CI is practiced in its entirety or not, if the Order cites such as
a legal reference. The answer to such would be obvious. We have to face the harsh reality that Liber CI is simply an
interesting historical piece written over seventy years ago and does not reflect one-tenth of the present day OTO nor
its Rules, Regulations or Bylaws regardless of what anyone wants to proselytize. The bottom line is that the OTO
has to stop hiding behind the shield of 'unFraternal behavior' which it screams at its members if it's equally guilty of
the same charge. If the Ordo Templi Orientis is upset with me openly discussing the possibility of lawsuits against
the fraternity then it has only to realize that I have learned my lessons well from within the fraternal halls of the
Order itself. In other words, sue everybody and if the Order can threaten lawsuits against you it becomes fair game
that you, as a member, can make counter claims against it. In other words, you can only mimic the fraternal behavior
to which you've been exposed and taught. The OTO has become sue crazy but everything within a fraternity is
double-edged sword. I only hope that the present day OTO is pleased with what they are teaching their Initiates.
Finally, yes, I agree 100% that it is the prerogative of the present day leadership of OTO to suspend or expel its
members for selling or quoting from King's book - but I'd suggest having a written policy stating such is forbidden
and why? However, it will not. To have such would imply that it would have to address many of the points which
I've made in this Epistle which legally could come back to haunt them if said policies contradict the Law of the
Land. It's much easier to use the scare tactics of claiming that one is violating their Oaths compounded by threats of
5
a lawsuit on the side in order to intimidate a member from doing what it legally has the right to do. However, this is
a dangerous practice much like walking on a razor's edge. I personally believe the Order simply needs to be honest
and up front to its members as was the late Grady McMurtry. It needs to tell them, that although it has no legal
ground to stop these books and pamphlets from being resold, it would like its membership's help in keeping them off
the shelves in used book stores or from being resold. This is very noble and a true 'fraternal approach.' The OTO
should hold to the fact that if an initiate believes in the Order they then they would freely oblige the written policies.
However, if a member chooses otherwise then so be it, or as John Lennon said, “Let it be.” It's between them and
their God. Stop the witch hunting and persecutions. As any parent will attest, if you beat a child or threaten them
repeatedly it will only foster rebellion and resentment. Both of these attitudes are grumblings which are growing
stronger each day within the present day fraternity known as Ordo Templi Orientis.
Love is the law, love under will. - AL: I:57
Frater A.
NOTES:
1. Francis King, The Secret Rituals of the OTO (London: The C. W. Daniel Company Ltd and New York: Samuel
Weiser Inc 1973).
2. Aleister Crowley letter to Frank Bennett, Australia, Sun in Capricorn, Moon in Capricorn An XII, 1916.
3. Phyllis McMurtry letter to Israel Regardie dated September 16th 1973 p.1.
4. Israel Regardie letter to Phyllis McMurtry dated November 8th 1973 p.3.
5. In The Continuum Vol.I No.2 An.LXIX 1973 pgs.3-9.
6. Hymenaeus Alpha, Caliph, Aleister Crowley's Ordo Templi Orientis, Dublin, California, a form letter July 9th
1974, p.4.
7. The Magickal Link, Official Monthly Bulletin of Ordo Templi Orientis, From the Caliph, On Aleister Crowley
Revisionism., Vol.II No.4 April 1982
8. The O.T.O. Newsletter, Vol.II No.7&8 Double Issue May 1979 Berkeley, Ca. p.89
9. The O.T.O. Newsletter, Vol.II No.1 June 1978 Berkeley, Ca. p.5.
10. E-Mail transmittal from Ben Fernee dated 4/8/99 quoting a letter he received from the Supreme Council of Ordo
Templi Orientis.
11. The Secret Rituals of the OTO p.57
12. Ibid p.73
13. Ibid.
14. Being Aleister Crowley's The Gospel According to St. Bernard Shaw.
15. Francis King, Crowley on Christ (London: The C. W. Daniel Co.Ltd. 1974) p.14.
16. Portable Darkness, edited by Scott Michaelsen, forwards by Robert Anton Wilson and Genesis P-Orridge (New
York: Harmony Books, New York, 1989) p.154.
17. De Arte Magica, A Commentary on Liber Agape (CT: Brocken Publications, East Haven 1980).
18. Aleister Crowley, Liber CI An Open Letter To Those Who May Wish To Join The Order, The 'Blue' Equinox
Vol.III No.1 (NY: Samuel Weiser, Inc. New York
1973) p.215.