A researcher conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether a new drug effectively reduces blood pressure in adults with hypertension. 100 adults with hypertension were randomly assigned to either receive the new drug or a placebo for 6 weeks. Their blood pressure was monitored and statistical analysis was used to determine if there were significant differences in blood pressure changes between the two groups. The randomized controlled trial design allows for a rigorous assessment of the drug's effectiveness by minimizing bias and allowing for comparison to a control group.
A researcher conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether a new drug effectively reduces blood pressure in adults with hypertension. 100 adults with hypertension were randomly assigned to either receive the new drug or a placebo for 6 weeks. Their blood pressure was monitored and statistical analysis was used to determine if there were significant differences in blood pressure changes between the two groups. The randomized controlled trial design allows for a rigorous assessment of the drug's effectiveness by minimizing bias and allowing for comparison to a control group.
A researcher conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether a new drug effectively reduces blood pressure in adults with hypertension. 100 adults with hypertension were randomly assigned to either receive the new drug or a placebo for 6 weeks. Their blood pressure was monitored and statistical analysis was used to determine if there were significant differences in blood pressure changes between the two groups. The randomized controlled trial design allows for a rigorous assessment of the drug's effectiveness by minimizing bias and allowing for comparison to a control group.
1 A researcher aimed to The research method used in this Justification for using an RCT in
investigate whether a new drug study is a randomized controlled this scenario:
effectively reduces blood trial (RCT) or experimental pressure in adults with method Randomization: Randomly hypertension. The researcher assigning participants into two selected a group of 100 adults groups (drug and placebo) helps with hypertension and randomly in minimizing the influence of divided them into two groups. confounding variables. It ensures Group A received the new drug, that any differences observed in while Group B received a the outcomes (blood pressure placebo. Both groups were changes) between the groups are monitored for changes in their more likely due to the blood pressure over six weeks. intervention (new drug) rather The data was collected, and than other factors. statistical analysis was conducted to determine if there is a Control Group: The use of a significant difference in blood control group (receiving a pressure changes between the placebo) allows for a comparison two groups. against the intervention group. This helps in assessing the true effect of the new drug by providing a baseline for comparison.
Blinding: Though it's not explicitly
mentioned, often in RCTs, blinding (single-blind or double- blind) is employed to reduce bias. Blinding prevents both the participants and the researchers from knowing who is receiving the drug or placebo, reducing the potential for bias in the assessment of outcomes.
Quantitative Analysis: The study
involves quantitative measurement (blood pressure changes) over a specific period, allowing for statistical analysis to determine the significance of the differences observed between the groups.
Replicability and Reliability: RCTs
are generally considered one of the most reliable methods for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. Their controlled design and randomized allocation increase the potential for replicability of results.
The use of an RCT in this scenario
allows for a more rigorous assessment of whether the new drug effectively reduces blood pressure compared to using other research methods. A researcher is interested in The research method used in this Non-Intrusive Data Collection: The researcher is observing and recording studying scenario is known as naturalistic behavior in its natural setting without any the eating habits of customers observation. interference or manipulation of the environment or participants. This allows