Family Development

FDD-KRA1. Conduct of FDS

Table 1. Number of FDS Attendees
Municipality Barangay Name of ML Target # of
Attendees (based
on CV F4)

SAN ANTONIO ANGELES SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 94

LUNA (POB.) SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 44

PUNDAQUIT SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 144

RIZAL SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 2

SAN ESTEBAN SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 52
SAN MIGUEL SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 138
SANTIAGO SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 33
ANTIPOLO (POB.) MADELEINE CARIAS 51
BURGOS (POB.) MADELEINE CARIAS 124
EAST DIRITA MADELEINE CARIAS 136
SAN GREGORIO (POB.) MADELEINE CARIAS 13
SAN JUAN (POB.) MADELEINE CARIAS 33
SAN NICOLAS (POB.) MADELEINE CARIAS 72
WEST DIRITA MADELEINE CARIAS 79
Total 1015

IP Considerations
Cite whether there is an IP only C/FDS conducted particularly in areas where indigenous people are minority and are not comf
presence of many non-IP beneficiaries (please use separate table for the IP only conducted session and incorporated when th
Was IP language used during the facilitation (what language was used)
Was there an IP who served as resource speaker
Cite other facilitation strategies used to tailor-fit on the
Was the topics tailored-fit to IPs (e.g culture and IP sensitivity)
Was there any materials/tools developed and being used in the region intended only for IPs? Please cite the module/session ti
of the module/session.
Topics tailored-fit to IPs
Cite whether there is a culture and IP sensitivity topic conducted among non-IP beneficiaries. How many non-IP beneficiaries p
Cite also the date where the FDS served as a venue to consult to IPs, for them to raise their concern and critically analyze the
unintended
Cite also theconsequences of the
other FDS topics programthat
conducted thattailored
could affect thebeneficiaries
fit to IP multiple aspects of thegroup
or specific lives, (include
how many theattended in this sessiop
date, disaggregated

Table 2. Newly Registered Household provided with foundational FDS Topic

Municipality Barangay Name of ML Target # of Newly
Registered HHs (as
of ____)
 Municipality Barangay Name of ML Target # of Newly
Registered HHs (as
of ____)
Baler ANGELES SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 38

SAN ESTEBAN SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 18

SAN MIGUEL SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 76

PUNDAKIT 3-set 12 SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 59
SANTIAGO-set 12 SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 10
LUNA- set 12 SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 20
RIZAL SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 1
ANTIPOLO MADELEINE CARIAS 22
BURGOS MADELEINE CARIAS 58
EAST DIRITA MADELEINE CARIAS 57
SAN GREGORIO MADELEINE CARIAS 3
SAN JUAN MADELEINE CARIAS 13
SAN NICOLAS MADELEINE CARIAS 32
WEST DIRITA MADELEINE CARIAS 36

Total 443

Table 3. Number of Transitioning Household Provided with FDS on Graduation

Municipality Barangay Name of ML Target # of
Transitioning HHs
(CS 14, CS 3)
Baler Brgy 1 Pob Juan Dela Cruz 15

Total 15
FDD-KRA2. Development of Learning Materials
Table 4. Number of Modules Developed

Municipality Name of ML Core Area Category

Target No. of FDS

Municipality Barangay Name of ML Team/s
Established
5
 FDS Core Area Session Title Title of Rider Topic
(if applicable)

Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A

Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A

Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A

Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A

Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A
Positive Parenting and Famiy Life Management FINANCIAL LITERACY N/A

digenous people are minority and are not comfortable in the

y conducted session and incorporated when the session was conducted )

d only for IPs? Please cite the module/session title and objective or purpose

beneficiaries. How many non-IP beneficiaries participated in the session?

o raise their concern and critically analyze the
s of thegroup
pecific lives, (include
how many theattended in this session
date, disaggregated date and cite
participants the number of disaggregated data
(IP/Non-IP)

# of Newly Registed HHs Provided with Foundational FDS Topics

Male Female
IP Non-IP IP
0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

0 0 0

# of Transitioning HHs Provided with FDS on Graduation

Male Female
IP Non-IP IP
0 3 1

0 3 1
 Category Title of Learning Material Short Description

Percentage of
Actual No. of FDS Team/s Established
Accomplishment

5 100.00%
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
 Number of FDS Attendees Total % of Analysis
Male Female Accomplishment What do these data tell us?
IP Non-IP IP Non-IP Answer:

0 0 0 87 87 92.55% San Antonio has a 1015 total target

follow up by the worker wh
0 0 0 42 42 95.45% Is there an increasing or decreasing
theindirectly
or compliance for this to
attributed month of J
the com
0 0 0 136 136 94.44% who are absent in the month of De
follow
0 0 0 2 2 100.00% Provide brief information on the to
0 1 0 47 48 92.31% Answer:
0 0 0 136 136 98.55%
0 1 0 32 33 100.00% Highlight gender and cultural consi
0 0 0 50 50 98.04% none so far
0 3 0 120 123 99.19%
4 0 129 133 97.79%
0 7 0 6 13 100.00%
0 3 0 30 33 100.00%
0 2 0 70 72 100.00%
0 2 0 77 79 100.00%
0 23 0 964 987 97.24%

Total % of Analysis
emale Accompli What do these data tell us? Accomplishments versus targets?
shment
 Total % of
Accompli
shment
Non-IP Answer:
0 38 100.00%
Cite the facilitating and hindering factors that have directly or indirectly attribute
0 18 100.00% Any catch up plan, if applicable?
0 76 100.00% Answer:
0 59 100.00% Provide brief information on the topics discussed. Why is it necessary to deliver t
0 10 100.00%
0 20 100.00% Highlight gender and cultural considerations
0 1 100.00% Answer:
0 22 100.00%
0 58 100.00% Using the IPSensitive/responsive FDS indicators briefly discuss the areas in terms
0 57 100.00% Answer:
0 3 100.00%
0 13 100.00%
0 32 100.00%
0 36 100.00%
#DIV/0!
0 443 100.00%

Total % of Analysis
emale Accompli What do these data tell us? Accomplishments versus targets?
shment
Non-IP Answer:
11 15 100.00%
Cite the facilitating and hindering factors that have directly or indirectly attribute
0 #DIV/0! Any catch up plan, if applicable?
0 #DIV/0! Answer:
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! Provide brief information on the topics discussed. Why is it necessary to deliver t
0 #DIV/0! Answer:
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! Highlight gender and cultural considerations
0 #DIV/0! Answer:
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! Using the IPSensitive/responsive FDS indicators briefly discuss the areas in terms
0 #DIV/0! Answer:
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
11 15 100.00%
Analysis

Total # of Learning Materials Developed/Translated/Conceptualized

Answer:

Discuss the contexts for developing the learning materials.

Answer:

Provide an overall summary to describe the materials.

Answer:

Who will benefit from this module?

Answer:

Cite the partners who worked collaboratively to develop the materials

Answer:

Using the IPSensitive/responsive FDS indicators briefly discuss whether there is a module developed/ enhance th
determine to the needs of the indigenous beneficiaries in developing gender-sensitive and culturally appropriate
modules and learning materials that serve to strengthen cultural identity

Answer:

Cite the materials developed or enhanced that address the identified needs of indigenous beneficiaries
Answer:

Analysis (Guide Questions):

● Cite the total number of teams established in the region and the average number of members per team
● Cite the province that gained the highest number of teams as well as the lowest number of teams established.
● Share strategies being used to establish the teams
● What are the challenges encountered during the establishment of the teams and what have you done on thos
● Discuss positive impact on the establishment of FDS teams
● Indicate the means of verification on the teams established through either of the following: EO/AO/SB Resoluti
these data tell us?

nio has a 1015 total target of the monitored grantee, 37 beneficiaries are absent in the FDS session despite being
ollow up by the worker while 978 beneficiaries attended and complied in the FDS with a total of 96.35%
n increasing or decreasing compliance rate? Cite the facilitating and hindering factors that has directly
pliance for this to
ctly attributed month of January israte
the compliance still the same as the compliance for December because still the same people
absent in the month of December and January. the hindering factor is the grantee alone because despite many
follow-ups, and home visitation still they are are cooperating.
rief information on the topics discussed. What are the key takeaways?

gender and cultural considerations

ctly or indirectly attributed to the compliance rate.

s it necessary to deliver the sessions? What are the key takeaways?

discuss the areas in terms of facilitation, topics and materials

ctly or indirectly attributed to the compliance rate.

s it necessary to deliver the sessions? What are the key takeaways?

discuss the areas in terms of facilitation, topics and materials

 le developed/ enhance that
nd culturally appropriate CFDS

us beneficiaries

members per team

mber of teams established. Any catch up plan, if applicable?

at have you done on those challenges and what was the outcome

owing: EO/AO/SB Resolution/LAC Agreement/etc

FDD-KRA3. Inventory of Parent Leaders
Table 5. Number of Parent Leaders by Selected Socio-Demographic Characteristic

Municipality Barangay

SAN ANTONIO ANGELES 1

SAN ANTONIO ANGELES 2

SAN ANTONIO ANGELES 3-set 12

SAN ANTONIO SAN ESTEBAN-1

SAN ANTONIO SAN ESTEBAN-2

SAN ANTONIO SAN MIGUEL 1

SAN ANTONIO SAN MIGUEL 2

SAN ANTONIO SAN MIGUEL 3- SET 12

SAN ANTONIO SAN MIGUEL 4- SET 12

SAN ANTONIO PUNDAKIT 1

SAN ANTONIO PUNDAKIT 2

SAN ANTONIO PUNDAKIT 3-set 12

SAN ANTONIO PUNDAKIT 4-set 12

SAN ANTONIO SANTIAGO

SAN ANTONIO SANTIAGO-set 12

SAN ANTONIO LUNA

SAN ANTONIO LUNA/Rizal- set 12

SAN ANTONIO BURGOS 1
SAN ANTONIO BURGOS 2
SAN ANTONIO BURGOS 3
SAN ANTONIO BURGOS 4
SAN ANTONIO EAST DIRITA 1
SAN ANTONIO EAST DIRITA 2
SAN ANTONIO EAST DIRITA 3
SAN ANTONIO EAST DIRITA 4
SAN ANTONIO ANTIPOLO 1
SAN ANTONIO ANTIPOLO 2
SAN ANTONIO SAN NICOLAS 1
SAN ANTONIO SAN NICOLAS 2
SAN ANTONIO WEST DIRITA 1
SAN ANTONIO WEST DIRITA 2
SAN GREGORIO
SAN JUAN
Total
 # Years
Name of ML Total # of PLs 1 year and More than 3 TOTAL
2 3
below years
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 10 10
PARINAS
SUNSHINE DENES
1 4 MONTHS 0
PARINAS
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 4 MONTHS 0
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 4 MONTHS 0
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 4 MONTHS 0
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 4 MONTHS 0
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 4 MONTHS 0
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 4 MONTHS 0
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 4 MONTHS 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
MADELEINE CARIAS 1 10 10
33 0 0 0 33 33
 Sex IP Affiliation PWD Solo Parent
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0 31 0 0 0 0 0
Solo Parent Senior Citizen
Female Male Female
0 0 0
FDD-KRA4. Implementation of the Gulayan sa Barangay
Table 6.Number of Household Engaged in Gulayan sa Barangay by Area

Target

Total Number of
Municipality Total No. of Parent Households
Barangay Name of ML
Groups (as of May and
November)

SAN ANTONIO ANGELES 1 SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 3 85

SAN ANTONIO SAN ESTEBAN SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 2 43
SAN ANTONIO SAN MIGUEL SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 4 129
SAN ANTONIO PUNDAKIT SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 4 123
SAN ANTONIO SANTIAGO SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 2 29
SAN ANTONIO LUNA SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 2 40
SAN ANTONIO RIZAL SUNSHINE DENES PARINAS 1 1
SAN ANTONIO BURGOS MADELEINE CARIAS 4 111
SAN ANTONIO EAST DIRITA MADELEINE CARIAS 4 116
SAN ANTONIO ANTIPOLO MADELEINE CARIAS 2 46
SAN ANTONIO SAN NICOLAS MADELEINE CARIAS 2 67
SAN ANTONIO WEST DIRITA MADELEINE CARIAS 2 69
SAN ANTONIO SAN GREGORIO MADELEINE CARIAS 1 11
SAN ANTONIO SAN JUAN MADELEINE CARIAS 1 29
Total 34 899
 Actual

No. of HH No. of Gulayan sa

No. of HH with
Total Number of Engaging in Barangay
% of HHs Involved Backyard Gardens
HHs Involved in Gulayan sa Established
in Gulayan Activity (including
Gulayan Activity Barangay (Community-
container gardens)
(Communal) based)

84 98.82% 84
43 100.00% 43 43 1
125 96.90% 125
118 95.93% 118
28 96.55% 28
40 100.00% 40
1 100.00% 1
106 95.50% 106
111 95.69% 111 106 1
41 89.13% 41
62 92.54% 62 62 1
64 92.75% 64
9 81.82% 9 9 1
24 82.76% 24
856 95.22% 856 220 4
 No. of Gulayan sa
Barangay Established
(School-based)