Argument Research Essay

Writing an Argument Research Essay can be a challenging endeavor that requires a combination of
critical thinking, research skills, and effective communication. The difficulty lies not only in
presenting a well-structured and coherent argument but also in conducting thorough research to
support your claims. This type of essay demands a deep understanding of the chosen topic and the
ability to analyze various perspectives, evidence, and counterarguments.

One of the primary challenges is finding reliable sources to back up your arguments. It involves
sifting through numerous academic articles, books, and other reputable publications to gather
relevant information. The process of synthesizing this information into a cohesive and persuasive
essay can be time-consuming and mentally taxing.

Crafting a compelling thesis statement is another hurdle. It requires a clear and concise articulation of
your main argument, which serves as the backbone of your entire essay. Developing a thesis that is
both specific and debatable adds an extra layer of complexity.

Moreover, striking the right balance between presenting your own perspective and acknowledging
opposing viewpoints is crucial. A successful argument essay should demonstrate an awareness of
different opinions and a skillful refutation of counterarguments.

The process of organizing and structuring your essay is yet another aspect that poses challenges.
Ensuring a logical flow of ideas, maintaining coherence between paragraphs, and supporting each
point with relevant evidence are essential components of a well-crafted argument essay.

In conclusion, writing an Argument Research Essay is a multifaceted task that demands critical
thinking, extensive research, and effective communication. Navigating through the complexities of
information, formulating a compelling thesis, and addressing counterarguments all contribute to the
overall difficulty of this writing assignment.

For those who find themselves struggling with similar essays or need assistance in various academic
writing tasks, there are resources available. Services like HelpWriting.net offer support for students
seeking help with their essays, research papers, and more. Professional assistance can be beneficial
for those looking to enhance their writing skills or manage their academic workload effectively.
Argument Research Essay Argument Research Essay
 Frankenstein as a Critique of Mary Shelley s Society Essay
Frankenstein as a Critique of Mary Shelley s Society

Nature plays a large role in the novel, Frankenstein , both as the natural world and
human nature. The book is clearly not a story of fun and happiness. It is a sad but
beautiful story of the need for love and acceptance in society. This reflects a lot on
Mary Shelley s life, as you can tell from the language used in the text that she is writing
from experience in many parts of the book. Civilization in the days of Mary Shelley is
very similar to modern day society, in certain respects, such as the significant presence of
justice and fear of the unknown both of which play important and pivotal roles in
Frankenstein .

Right from the moment of the monster s birth , he ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Although it is almost impossible to avoid making these snap decisions, they can
almost always be changed later on, and put right once you get to know the person.
Everyone wants to be accepted for who they are, regardless of appearances or stature,
however this is not always the case. This can be related to the treatment the monster
receives upon meeting other people. He is not the norm , and is undoubtedly ugly to
look at, but that does not make him a bad person. Shelley manages to show this in such
a way that the reader feels sorry for the monster, but we can see that it is something that
is unlikely to change, as it is a normal part of society and human nature. Shelley shows
her disgust at this harsh treatment through the monster s feelings, which are shared with
Victor later on in the book, and it is as if the author is pouring out her emotions, rather
than the monster s.

The hideous figure, the disfigured stature of this monster is the first thing noticed by
Victor Frankenstein. His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles. This
reference to the monster s yellow skin depicts the same behaviour conducted in modern
day racism. The colour of one s skin does not dictate the intelligence, attitude and
personality of a person. Regardless of the yellow skin of the monster,
which
 Acct 358 Tut

ACCT 358

Tutorial for Week Beginning 11 March 2013

Tutorial: Company Taxation: Imputation, RWT/NRWT (continued) Dividend Imputation

1. SpannerWorks Limited is a closely held private company incorporated on 1 April
2001. Its share capital comprises $40,000 $1 ordinary shares fully paid and 10,000 15%
preference shares fully paid to $1.00. SpannerWorks Limited has provided you with a
list of the following tax transactions it has entered into. The opening balance of the ICA
account as at 31 March 2011 was $1,500.
Imputation ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Imputation credits allocated are only 50% of the maximum allowable.| (l)| 7 May
2012| SpannerWorks pays the 3rd instalment of 2012 provisional tax of $200.| (m)| 28
Aug. 2012| SpannerWorks pays the 1st instalment of 2013 provisional tax of $200.|
(n)| 10 Nov. 2012| SpannerWorks receives a tax refund in respect of the 2010 income
year. Refund per the return for the year ended 31 March 2010 was $3,600 (net of any
UOMI).| (o)| 20 Dec. 2012| SpannerWorks pays a dividend on ordinary shares of 12%.
The maximum allowable ratio of imputation credits are allocated.| (p)| 15 Jan. 2013|
SpannerWorks pays the 2nd instalment of 2013 provisional tax of $400.| | | No other
relevant transactions to 31 March 2013.|
REQUIRED:
(i) Complete the Imputation Credit Account entries for the above data, using the
following format:

Date| Item| Debit| Credit| Balance| DR/CR| 1 Apr. 2011| Opening balance| | | 1,500.00|
CR| 15 Apr. 2011| | | | | | 7 May 2011| | | | | | 28 Aug 2011| | | | | | 7 Oct 2011| | | | | | 10 Dec
2011| | | | | | 15 Jan 2012| | | | | | 7 Fev 2012| | | | | | 2 Apr 2012| | | | | | 2 Apr 2012| | | | | |
15Apr 2012| | | | | | 7 May 2012| | | | | | 28 Aug 2012| | | | | | 10 Nov 2012| | | | | | 20 Dec
2012| | | | | | 15 Jan 2012| | | | | |
(ii)What action is required in view of the different ratio of
 The Purpose Of History
For a historicist historian, the purpose of history is to show what actually happened in
the past. This can be found out with sources and past records. Once enough information
is found, the historians can use it to recreate the past and by learning about it as a study
they are able to use what they learn to recreate it with objectivity. After these historians
are able to recreate the past from all of their research, they will discuss it with other
historians, who have studied the discipline, and come up with the only true interpretation
of the event. By finding the sole interpretation, these historians are able to accurately
state what happened as, the strict presentation of the facts, contingent and unattractive
though they may be, is undoubtedly... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For some of the monuments, there are different time periods that need to be examined,
the heroes during the Civil War and when the monuments were built during the Civil
Rights Movement. When the historians contextualize the monuments they need to uses
sources from both time periods. The other problem is that these historians believe in
judging the past by their own standards of belief and not current ones. The question is
should we accept those beliefs while we contextualize the monuments, as they are
different from the ones accepted by society