Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crafting an essay on the topic "Sample Outline For Argumentative Essay" presents its own set of
challenges. Firstly, the subject itself demands a comprehensive understanding of argumentative essay
structures and principles. Delving into the intricacies of constructing a sample outline requires a solid
grasp of logical reasoning, persuasive techniques, and a nuanced understanding of the chosen theme.
One of the difficulties lies in striking the right balance between presenting a clear, well-organized
outline and providing insightful content. The challenge is not merely to create a list of points but to
ensure that each element of the outline contributes meaningfully to the overall argument. This
necessitates careful consideration of the order and hierarchy of ideas, as well as a keen awareness of
the audience's perspective.
Moreover, navigating the fine line between being persuasive and maintaining objectivity can be a
delicate task. Balancing the presentation of evidence, counterarguments, and one's own stance
requires a nuanced approach to avoid a biased or overly one-sided essay. Crafting a compelling
argumentative essay involves not just expressing personal opinions but also acknowledging opposing
viewpoints with respect and addressing them effectively.
Additionally, the process of researching relevant data and finding credible sources to support the
outlined arguments adds another layer of complexity. Ensuring that the evidence is up-to-date,
reliable, and aligns with the chosen theme is crucial for the overall strength of the essay.
In conclusion, writing an essay on the topic "Sample Outline For Argumentative Essay" demands a
blend of skills encompassing logical reasoning, persuasive writing, research proficiency, and a clear
understanding of essay structure. It's a task that requires time, effort, and a strategic approach to
ensure that the final product is not only well-structured but also effectively conveys the intended
argument. If you find yourself grappling with such tasks, remember that assistance is available.
Similar essays and much more can be ordered on HelpWriting.net , where professionals can provide
the support needed to navigate the complexities of academic writing.
Sample Outline For Argumentative EssaySample Outline For Argumentative Essay
Comparison Between Luxor Temple And Saint Peter s Basilica
ANCIENT ARCHITECTURE
Luxor Temple and Saint Peter s Basilica
I.OVERVIEW
The two pieces of art that I have chosen to compare are The Luxor Temple located in
Luxor, Egypt and Saint Peter s Basilica located within Vatican City of Rome, Italy. The
ancient design has fostered some of its styles and characteristics into future generations,
and also upheld the mysteries of phenomenal architecture over the centuries. I believe
the Luxor Temple and Saint Peter s Basilica are good pieces for comparison. The details
and the architectural features between both of these great Arts show ingenuity,
symmetry, geometry and balance from two very diverse time periods. The aspects of
their values, religious beliefs, culture, and mythology play key roles in the beliefs of
both timepieces of Art. The architectural medium is not only impressive, but it is
captivating to the eye as well. One can only marvel at the unique wonders of ancient
civilization.
The Luxor Temple Chinlung, Hsieh. Sacred Destinations. Photo of Luxor Temple:
#19137. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 May 2015. ( http://www.sacred destinations.com/egypt/luxor
luxor temple ). Maderno, Carlos. Maderno, Carlos: Saint Peter s Basilica, Façade in Rome
1607. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 May 2015. ( http://www.britannica.com
/biography/Carlo Maderno/images videos/Facade of St Peters Basilica Rome by Carlo
Maderno 1607/12767 ).
1.1 Background
Basel Capital accord is a capital adequacy framework developed by the Basel committee.
In 1988, the Basel Committee decided to introduce a capital measurement system
commonly referred to as the Basel Capital Accord. This system provided for the
implementation of a credit risk measurement framework with a minimum capital
requirement of 8% on banks Risk Weighted Assets (RWA). The 1988 framework is also
known as Basel I . Since 1988, this framework has been progressively introduced not only
in member countries but also virtually in all other countries.
The international convergence on capital measurement and capital standard 2004 is
popularly known as Basel II. It is a capital ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The rationale of Basel II was to reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage and make
regulatory capital requirements more risk sensitive by incorporating advances made in
banks‟ internal risk management practices in calculating regulatory capital
requirements. The „International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital
Standards: A revised Framework‟, known as Basel II, was agreed in 2004 and consisted
of three pillars corresponding to minimum regulatory capital requirements in Pillar 1,
the supervisory review process in Pillar 2 and market discipline in Pillar 3. 1. First Pillar
The first pillar deals with maintenance of regulatory capital calculated for three major
components of risk that a bank faces: credit risk, operational risk, and market risk. Other
risks are not considered fully quantifiable at this stage.
Credit Risk| Operational Risk| Market Risk| Standardized Approach Foundation IRB
Approach Advanced IRB Approach| Basic Indicator Approach Standardized Approach
Advanced Measurement Approach| Standardized Approach Internal Model Approach|
2. Second Pillar
This is a regulatory response to the first pillar, giving regulators better tools over those
previously available. It also provides a framework for dealing with systemic