Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Constitution
• 2017
• The Preamble of Indian Constitution is a reflection of its Philosophy,
Comment.
• 2016
• Elucidate and discuss the features of Indian Constitution. To what extent does
preamble reflect these features.
• 2015
• Explain the philosophy of the Indian Constitution.
What do we mean by philosophy of
constitution?
• Political Philosophy behind the constitution
• Preamble
• Asymmetric Federalism to maintain unity and integrity of nation and to accommodate aspirations
of diversity of federating units
• Deep commitment to protection of rights of minority, and marginalized communities
• Article 26, 29, 30, 46, 6th schedule
Other Features of the Constitution
• Parliamentary form of Government
• Independence of Judiciary
GOOD LUCK !
Fundamental Rights
As contained in Indian Constitution
• Article 23
• Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour
• Article 24
• Prohibition of children in hazardous job
Right to Freedom of Religion
• Article 25
• Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion
• Article 26
• Freedom to manage religious affairs
• Article 27
• Freedom as to payment of taxes for promotion of any particular religion
• Article 28
• Freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or religious worship in certain educational
institutions
Educational & Cultural Rights
• Article 29
• Rights to Minorities to protect their language, Script, culture, etc
• Article 30
• Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
Right to Constitutional Remedy
• Article 32 :
• right to approach Supreme Court for the enforcement of the rights
• Writs: HC, article 226 and SC-article 32, can issue writs to protect the rights
• habeas corpus
• mandamus
• prohibition
• quo warranto
• certiorari
Do we have too much or too less of rights?
• Modern constitution such as of South Africa provides extensive array of rights
such as right to dignity, privacy, housing, children’s right, etc
• In that comparison our guaranteed rights are limited
• Some may feel that almost all rights are further limited by multiple conditions put
as proviso attached to each article in part III
• However, SC by its power of Judicial Review, has increased the scope of right to
life under – now right to Education, clean air, shelter, privacy, etc
Directive Principles of State Policy
• Contained in part IV – article 36 to 51
• Inspired by Irish constitution
• Policy guidelines and aspirational statements set as guidance
• Some directives
• Establishment of welfare state: 38,39,42,43,46,47
• Obligation of state on educational and cultural matter: 45, 49
• Distributive Justice, social control of production: 39
• Right to work ,Living wages for workers: 43
• Uniform civil code : 44
• Nutrition &health: 47
• Educational and economic interests of SC, ST, weaker sections: 46
• Environmental protection: 48A
FR Vs. DPSP
Fundamental Rights Directive Principles
Negative rights: Limits the authority of Positive rights: exhort the government
the state to become ideal welfare state
Courts can struck laws contravening FR Court can validate the sanctity of any
law enacted to implement DPSP
FR Vs DPSP: Traversing the legal interpretations
• Champakam Dorairajan case- 1951
• DPSP subordinate/subsidiary to FR
• FR can be amended by parliament
• Golaknath case: 1967
• FR unalterable, sacrosanct
• Amendment Act ‘law’ under 13(2)
• 24th , 25th amendment : 1971
• Parliament had amending power to FR
• Any law to give effect to DPSP contained in 39(b) and 39(c)- distributive justice and social
control of means of production shall be out of judicial review on the ground that it
contravened FR under 14 and 19
FR VS DPSP
• Keshavnanda Bharti case- 1973
• Amendment act within the purview of Judicial Review
• Basic structure doctrine
• Parliament has limited power to amendment
• 42nd amendment- 1976- expanded scope of 31(c)- instead of 39(b) and
39(c) all of part IV –DPSP came in its preview
• But this extension was struck down by Minerva Mill Case-1980
So Where It Finally Lands To?
• FR can be amended by due process of law
• But basic structure of constitution can not be altered by
such amendments
• DPSP 39(b) and 39(c) prevails over FR 14 and 19
• FR and DPSP complements each other, go hand in hand
• FR vs DPSP
• 2017
• Write an Essay on the importance of fundamental rights with special reference to
article 19.
• Notes : right to equality
• 2016
• Do you agree that Directive principles of state policy complements the fundamental
rights ? Give Reasons.
• 2015
• Explain relation between fundamental rights and Directive principles of state policy.
What are Fundamental Rights?
• Bill of rights to citizens
• Specifically enshrined in the constitution
• Guaranteed by constitutional provisions
• Can not be taken away easily
• Ensures fundamental or natural human rights i.e. Liberty, freedom,
equality, and dignity
From Where the Concept Came In
• Emanates from the Preamble, which resolves to secure Justice,
equality, and liberty to all Indian Citizen
• England's Bill of Rights,
• United States Bill of Rights,
• France's Declaration of the Rights of Man
Fundamental Rights in Indian Constitution
• Contained in part III of the constitution
• From article 14 to 32
• Right to equality : article 14 to 18
• Right to Freedom : article 19 to 22
• Right against exploitation : article 23 to 24
• Right to freedom of Religion: article 25 to 28
• Cultural & Educational Rights: article 29 to 30
• Rights to constitutional remedies : article 32
Right to Equality
• Article 14 : Equality before law
• Equality before the Law
• Equal Protection of Law
• Article 23
• Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour
• Article 24
• Prohibition of children in hazardous job
Right to Freedom of Religion
• Article 25
• Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion
• Article 26
• Freedom to manage religious affairs
• Article 27
• Freedom as to payment of taxes for promotion of any particular religion
• Article 28
• Freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or religious worship in certain educational
institutions
Educational & Cultural Rights
• Article 29
• Rights to Minorities to protect their language, Script, culture, etc
• Article 30
• Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
Right to Constitutional Remedy
• Article 32 :
• right to approach Supreme Court for the enforcement of the rights
• Writs: HC, article 226 and SC-article 32, can issue writs to protect the rights
• habeas corpus
• mandamus
• prohibition
• quo warranto
• certiorari
Do we have too much or too less of rights?
• Modern constitution such as of South Africa provides extensive array of rights
such as right to dignity, privacy, housing, children’s right, etc
• In that comparison our guaranteed rights are limited
• Some may feel that almost all rights are further limited by multiple conditions put
as proviso attached to each article in part III
• However, SC by its power of Judicial Review, has increased the scope of right to
life under – now right to Education, clean air, shelter, privacy, etc
Directive Principles of State Policy
• Contained in part IV – article 36 to 51
• Inspired by Irish constitution
• Policy guidelines and aspirational statements set as guidance
• Some directives
• Establishment of welfare state: 38,39,42,43,46,47
• Obligation of state on educational and cultural matter: 45, 49
• Distributive Justice, social control of production: 39
• Right to work ,Living wages for workers: 43
• Uniform civil code : 44
• Nutrition &health: 47
• Educational and economic interests of SC, ST, weaker sections: 46
• Environmental protection: 48A
FR Vs. DPSP
Fundamental Rights Directive Principles
Negative rights: Limits the authority of Positive rights: exhort the government
the state to become ideal welfare state
Courts can struck laws contravening FR Court can validate the sanctity of any
law enacted to implement DPSP
FR Vs DPSP: Traversing The Legal
Interpretations
• Champakam Dorairajan case- 1951
• DPSP subordinate/subsidiary to FR
• FR can be amended by parliament
• Golaknath case: 1967
• FR unalterable, sacrosanct
• Amendment Act ‘law’ under 13(2)
• 24th , 25th amendment : 1971
• Parliament had amending power to FR
• Any law to give effect to DPSP contained in 39(b) and 39(c)- distributive justice and social
control of means of production shall be out of judicial review on the ground that it
contravened FR under 14 and 19
FR VS DPSP
• Keshavnanda Bharti case- 1973
• Amendment act within the purview of Judicial Review
• Basic structure doctrine
• Parliament has limited power to amendment
• 42nd amendment- 1976- expanded scope of 31(c)- instead of 39(b) and
39(c) all of part IV –DPSP- came in its preview
• But this extension was struck down by Minerva Mill Case-1980
So Where It Finally Lands To?
• FR can be amended by due process of law
• But basic structure of constitution can not be altered by
such amendments
• DPSP 39(b) and 39(c) prevails over FR 14 and 19
• FR and DPSP complements each other, go hand in hand
GOOD LUCK !
Changing Nature of
Indian Federalism
भारत के
संघीय ढााँचे का बदलता स्वरूप
• A member from Orissa warned that “the Centre is likely to break” since powers had been excessively
centralised under the Constitution.
• They and many of the members reasoned at length that only a strong centre could maintain law & order, plan
for the well-being of the country, mobilise the available economic resources, establish a proper
administration, and defend the country against foreign aggression
Asymmetric Nature of Indian Federalism
• More items on union lists
• Parliament much more powerful than state legislature
• Amending power- Art 368
• Can legislate on state subjects – Art. 249, 250,252, 253
• Can change name, boarder, and area of state –Art 3
• Overriding power on concurrent list- Art 246
• Residual power –Art 248
• Emergency provisions- Art 352, 356, 360
• Single constitution, Integrated Judiciary, Election commission, and Audit
Machinery
• Governor
Asymmetric Nature of Indian Federalism..contd
• All India Service
• Appointment of HC Judges, Members Public service commission,
Governor
• More financial resources to centre
• More administrative powers to centre
• Power to direct state –Art 255, 257, 355, 365
• Absolute veto power to President on state legislation- Art 200, 201
• Extra constitutional institutions
• Planning commission/Niti Aayog, NDC, CBI
• Centrally sponsored schemes
Changes Post 1991
• Factors behind the changing trend:
• Rise and importance of Regional/state parties
• Judicial Intervention
• Bommai case- 1994
• Federalism- basic feature of constitution
• Use of article 356 under Judicial Review
• Symptoms of change
• Lesser use of Article 356
• Lesser use of veto on state legislators by President
• Abolition of centralised planning
• More say of states in signing of international treaties
• States allowed to seek FDI directly, make industrial and economic policy
• End of centralised industrial licensing
• State specific welfare schemes
SUMMARY
• Nationalists demanded provincial autonomy, but framed very strong centre
federal structure
• Till 1980s, because of single party dominance and aspiration for strong
state, Indian state functioned as virtual unitary state.
• But post 1991,in the coalition era and rising importance of regional parties
in central politics, greater political federalism is evident
How to write essay type answers on Federalism?
• Introduction
• Introduce the concept of federalism, uniqueness of Indian federalism- start with historical background
• Centre heavy or asymmetric Indian federal structure: just introduce, no details
• Give a glimpse of your conclusion- finally what you want to say – strong centre federal structure is as per
constitutional design. single party dominance till 1980s made it look even more asymmetric but coalition era
since 1991 allowed regional/state party to be more assertive and demand autonomy for states. This led to
politically greater federal nature of Indian polity
• Conclusion
• Paraphrase introduction
• State your final view and concluding remarks – more federalist nature of Indian polity post 1991 may be
lauded by many on the ground that it fulfils federal spirit of constitution but weather it is greater federalism or
regionalism or fragmentation of Indian polity is matter of interpretation.
References
• Introduction to the Constitution of India : D.D. Basu
• Constitution of India : M. Laxmikanth
• Constitutional Democracy and Government in India: Ruchi Tyagi
• Recommended reading list of DU syllabus for this paper
• Materials available on WWW and you tube videos
THANK YOU!
GOOD LUCK !
Parliament vs Judiciary
Judicial Review Vs. Parliamentary
Sovereignty
• Appointment of Judges
• 124(2) : Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President consultation with such of the Judges
of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary
• Striking down the NJAC Act 2015 by SC
• Autonomy of speakers
• Speaker's decisions were brought under Judicial Review
Constitutional Amendments
• Golaknath case-1967
• Constitutional amendment Act was also ‘’law’’ within purview of 13(2)
• FR sacrosanct and hence not amendable
• 25th Amendment-1971
• 31 (c ) : Acts passed to implement provisions contained in article 39(b), 39(c) shall not be void on the ground
of contravening FR under article 14, 19, 31
• Keshavnanda Bharti case-1973
• Parliament can amend fundamental rights any other part of constitution provided ‘’basic features’’ of the
constitution are not altered.
• 42nd Amendment -1976
• Acts passed to implement provisions contained in any of directive principles shall not be void on the ground of
contravening FR under article 14, 19, 31
• 44th Amendment -1978
• Abolished FR to property
• Minerva Mill Case-1980
• Struck down article 368 (clause 4,5) – parliament’s amendment power limited by doctrine of ‘’basic features’’
References
• Introduction to the Constitution of India : D.D. Basu
• Constitution of India : M. Laxmikanth
• Constitutional Democracy and Government in India: Ruchi Tyagi
• Recommended reading list of DU syllabus for this paper
• Materials available on WWW and you tube videos
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Judicial Review Vs.
Parliamentary Sovereignty
WHAT IS
Role, power, functions, and jurisdiction
IN
STORE? Judicial Review and Basic Structure
Doctrine
Public Interest Litigation and Judicial
Activism
The Judiciary: Supreme Court
• 2017
• Explain in brief power and functions of Supreme court of India with special reference
to Judicial Review.
• Notes : 1. basic structure doctrine
• 2. Judicial activism
• 2016
• How is supreme court of India constituted? Critically examine its role in protecting
basic structure of Indian Constitution.
• 2015
• What is judicial review? How has it impacted upon the relation between parliament
and supreme court.
• Notes : Public Interest Litigation
Role of
Judiciary in • To interpret the laws made by the Legislatures
Procedural
Democracy
Article 124 : Constitution of SCI
• 124(1): There shall be a Supreme Court of India constituting of a Chief Justice of India and, not
more than 30 other Judges
• 124(2) :Every Judge of the SCI shall be appointed by the President after consultation with such of the Judges
of the SC and HC as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains
the age of 65 years:
• Collegium system : CJI and 4 senior most judges of SCI recommends Govt. names for
appointment and transfers of SCI and HC Judges
• Outcome of 3 Judges cases between 1981 and 1998
• National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) Act 2014 – struck down by SCI
• Judicial Activism
• Seems to encroach upon executive domain
• More exigencies on PIL than settling disputes
• Undermine popular will as expressed by parliament
• Distort balance of power
Pros and cons of Judicial Activism
In favour Criticism
• Helped maintain constitutional • Distorted balance of power
state • Encroached upon executive domain
• Undermined parliamentary
• Filled gap in electoral politics sovereignty
• ‘Tyranny of the un-elected’
• Made executive accountable • Created vested interest market for
PIL
• Diverted resources from conflict
resolution
References
GOOD LUCK !
Is the Presidential
Assertiveness Reality of Indian
Politics?
इस टॉपिक िर कै से पिखे उत्तर ?
DU, SOL, IGNOU BA HONS. POLITICAL SCIENCE EXAM HELP
Analysis of past year’s question
WHAT IS
Constitutional provisions allowing
IN discretion to the President
STORE? Instances of assertiveness by the President
of India
Guide on how to write answer on this topic
in university exams
2017 Critically evaluate role and
position of the President in
the Indian political system.
Past year’s
questions
2015 Is the Presidential
assertiveness reality of
Indian Politics? Explain.
Role, Position, Powers of the President
• President as head of executives
• Article 53: executive power of state is vested in president
• Supreme commander of armed forces
• Appoints all constitutional officials- PM, ministers, Chief Justice, Governor, CAG, CVC, Election commissioners,
members of UPSC, Governors, AG
• As part of Legislature: Legislative functions
• Finally decides disqualification of MP- article 103
• Summoning, addressing, proroguing parliament
• Dissolution of house of people
• Money bill cannot be introduced without his prior sanction
• Grant, withhold assent to bills passed by parliament- Veto power
• Ordinance making power
• Right to get informed on executive and legislative matters by the PM- article 78, and has direct
access to Parliament through messages.
• Emergency powers
• Judicial powers
• Can grant pardons, reprieve, respite, remissions or can suspend, remit, or commute sentences
• Represents the federal system and federation
Presidential Assertiveness: myth or reality?
• Relevant articles:
• 53: The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President
• 74(1) :There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid
and advise the President who shall, in the exercise of his functions, act in accordance
with such advice
• 75(1) : The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President
• Occasions when president may use his discretion:
• Appointing prime-minister when no party get majority after election
• Accepting advise of dissolution of Lok Sabha by council of minister not commanding
confidence of the house
• Keeping the passed bill pending for his assent
• Public speeches, interviews, without getting it vetted by the govt.
Instances of presidential assertiveness
• 1950s: Dr. Rajendra Prasad: differed on many issues, especially on Hindu code bill and
suggested that president is not entirely bound by advice of council of minister
• 1979- Dr. Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy appointed Charan Singh as Prime minister and accepted his
advise on dissolution of Lok Sabha
• Gaini Jail Singh in 1986 returned the postal bill without giving assent
• 1996: Shankar Dayal Sharma returned two executive orders to the cabinet
• R.K.Narayan
• Twice- in 1997 and 1998- returned proposals of cabinet for imposition of emergency in UP and Bihar
respectively
• he set a new precedent whereby it became mandatory for a person staking a claim to the Prime
Minister's office to produce letters of support from alliance partners.
• Delivered public speeches and interviews not vetted by govt.
Instances of presidential assertiveness…
• 2006: APJ Kalam returned office of profit bill to cabinet
• Pranab Mukherjee
• 2014: refused to sign ordinances on anti-corruption law
• 2017: commuted death sentences of four convicts against the advise of the
cabinet
• Disapproved suggestion to send former West Bengal governor India’s next
ambassador to Myanmar
Is the Presidential assertiveness reality of Indian Politics? Explain.
Ans. Template
• Introduction
•Introduce the constitutional position of president, uniqueness of Indian presidency
•Just state the executive, legislative, judicial, and other powers of president
•State occasions where can use his discretion
•Give a glimpse of your conclusion- finally what you want to say – As head of state president has been assigned
supreme powers in executive, legislative, judicial domain. But except few occasions most of these powers are
exercised by council of minister headed by prime minister. Despite this, successive presidents have asserted
themselves on several occasions, especially during coalition era, making the presidency somewhat enigmatic.
• Body : substance of the answer
• explain role, position, powers of president
• Explain the occasions where presidents may use his powers at his own discretion.
• Provide instances of assertiveness by presidents
• Conclusion
• Contrary to popular image of Indian president being mere titular head or rubber stamp, presidency has been
provided with few but very significant discretionary power by the constitution. Successive presidents have used
them and other constitutional ambiguities to assert themselves. on those occasions, the Rashtrapati Bhawan
turns into ”silent volcano’” from otherwise the “the sanctuary in the storm”.
THANKS FOR WATCHING!
GOOD LUCK !
The Indian prime minister
was never ‘first among
equals’
How to tackle this topic in university exams?
DU, SOL, IGNOU BA HONS. POLITICAL SCIENCE EXAM HELP
Is Prime Minister only ‘first among equal’?
• The term "Prime Minister" can mean "primary minister" or "first
minister". In this sense the Prime Ministers may be considered to be
"first among equals“
• But even in England, where this term was used for PM, the role and
position of Prime minister far surpassed the original role envisioned
in its constitution
• 74(1) :There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the
head to aid and advise the President who shall, in the exercise of his
functions, act in accordance with such advice
• 75(1) : The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President and the other
Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime
Minister.
GOOD LUCK !