Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Process:
o review the research gathered for the informative paper, re-examining the sources in order to take
a position on the issue
o form a supportable argument/ persuasive assertion/ thesis statement in order to persuade a
general academic audience (instructor and class peers) to accept your position, or to recognize
your position as reasonable and viable, worth consideration
o write an argumentative research paper, based on research sources, formatted and documented per
APA standards, applying the concepts of the rhetorical triangle and the Toulmin Model
Required Sources:
5 to 7 credible sources must be cited in the paper. (Sources can be cited more than once.)
o at least three of the sources should be scholarly sources from academic library databases
(Proquest, Ebscohost, or similar) – click the “scholarly” box on the search site
(“scholarly” can include, but is not limited to, peer-reviewed journal articles)
o at least one of the sources should be a credible, reliable Web source (see Writing
Arguments p.282 and the Purdue OWL site for reliability guidelines)
note: no Wikipedia, no general encyclopedias, no blog sites, no emails, tweets, etc.
note: only one article from Issues and Controversies may be used/ cited
note: You are welcome to use the sources which you researched for the informational paper --
You are also welcome to research and use other sources.
Organization:
o The essay should follow the classical organizational pattern (see chpt.3 Writing Arguments), or a
variation of this pattern, unless the topic justifies a different organization
Introduction
o identifies your narrowed, focused controversial issue topic
o establishes that the issue is complex, problematic, and significant
o states the paper’s argument/ thesis/ assertion
note: You do not need to take a completely “pro” or “con” position on the issue
Body Paragraphs
Use a classical organizational pattern or similar effective organization
Apply the concepts of the rhetorical triangle and the Toulmin Method
o Present and support your position
o Provide transitions where appropriate for the flow of your argument
o Summarize opposing views. The summary must be complete and fair.
note: The opposition section can stand alone or be combined it with the next section.
o Respond to opposing views. This section includes refutations of opposing views and/or
concessions to strong reasons presented by the opposition (use qualifiers?)
o Be aware of warrants and unstated assertions – provide backing where appropriate
o Write the paper in objective, 3rd person point of view, even though you are presenting
your position (no “I” or “you”).
o Cite sources (see required number and kinds above) per APA parenthetical guidelines.
Conclusion
o reaffirms the argument/ persuasive point and brings your essay to closure
o leaves a strong final impression (perhaps call for action or relate to a larger context)
note: If you have personal experience related to the paper topic, or want to comment in first person, you
are welcome, but not required, to include a brief first-person paragraph following the conclusion.
References Page
Format an APA References page – see above for required sources
Follow APA standards (see Writing Arguments, The Longman Handbook, and reliable academic
online sites including the Purdue OWL)
Note:
-- See the Bb class site for due dates for the paper and for progress assignments related to the paper.
-- See the rubric posted on Bb for grading points.
-- See the syllabus for weighted grades and for policies related to this assignment (academic integrity
policy, late submission policy, course grading policy)