Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Colonial Influences in the Development of Psychological Thought
in the Philippines
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this module, you will be able to:
1. understand that Filipino psychology is a case of cultural diffusion between
indigenous psychology and western schools of thought.
2. learn and appreciate the colonial influence in the development of
psychological science in the Philippines.
Course Module
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM: IMPETUS TO COLONIAL
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE PHILIPPINES
The United States colonized the Philippines and established an English-based
educational system in the country. This was followed by the development
and institutionalization of the English language as a framework of
communication for the country's legal system, commerce, industry, media,
etc.
It was through the educational system that American culture proliferated in
the Philippines. Those who went through the schools have experienced
western science and cultural concepts, including the language of research,
interpretation, and construction. Through educational institutions
established by the American regime, Filipinos have learned not only Western
culture but also Western psychological science. Introduction to Psychology
course in the undergraduate class was held at the University of the
Philippines College of Education using American textbooks and English as a
medium of instruction. Dr. Alfredo V. Lagmay (1984) observed the
interconnectedness of the English language and educational system to the
development of psychological thought in the country:
The history of modern psychology in the Philippines has, in fact, parallel to that
of the English language and the educational system in the culture. Scientific
psychology began with the establishment of a comprehensive educational
system by the American colonial administration. Teacher training institutions
and the Department of Education were at the forefront in the utilization of
psychological knowledge in education. The state-owned University of the
Philippines, from 1918 onwards, modeled for the entire country an educational
curriculum that was heavy in psychological courses.
Course Module
The first attempt to develop indigenous psychological testing is credited to
Sinforoso Padilla, who succeeded Alonzo as the psychology department
Chairman at the University of the Philippines. However, the Chairmanship
post, coupled with teaching and administrative responsibilities, kept Padilla’s
hands full. His articulate and prolific colleague Manuel Carreon published in
New York his Ph.D. dissertation: Philippine Studies in Mental Measurement in
1926, who continued the research on appropriate and relevant psychological
testing. While his thesis and arguments were valid, he committed the mistake
of writing it using the English language. As a result of this, copies of his book
were not landed on shelves of psychological testing but shelved instead in
the university libraries' Filipiniana section in America and the Philippines.
Consequently, Psychological tests developed in America were continuously
administered to unsuspecting respondents in a language hardly mastered by
them. Some guidance counselors who understood Carreon’s intention
modified the tests to make it appear suitable to the Philippine setting. This
technique to improve test validity was later known as the “change-apples-to-
bananas” approach.
Estefania Aldaba-Lim, who earned her Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the
University of Michigan, established the Institute of Human Relations two
years after the Philippines won its independence from the United States. The
institute was the country's first training center that provided extensive scale
for teachers in guidance and counseling. During Marcos' presidency, Dr.
Aldaba-Lim served as Minister of Social Works – the highest government post
given to a Filipino Psychologist.
Another student of Dr. Alonzo who later spearheaded the transfer of the
Psychology department from Education to Liberal Arts is Alfredo V. Lagmay,
who was a recipient of a Psychology fellowship in Harvard, where he was
trained with B.F. Skinner in Experimental Psychology. Dr. Lagmay, who had a
background in philosophy from a department which during that period was
steeped in logical positivism and staunchly against the sectarianism foisted
by the Catholics through UP Student Catholic Action, was ostensibly sent to
the US to weaken the UP Department of Philosophy which was headed during
that time by Ricardo Pascual, who is known for being an articulate,
charismatic, and controversial agnostic-philosopher.
Lagmay has also produced calibre students whose contributions to the study of
Psychology in the Philippines are remarkable. Among the scholars include
Sikolohiyang Pilipino
5
Colonial Influences in the Development of Psychological Thought
in the Philippines
Course Module
SPANISH INFLUENCED UNIVERSITIES IN MANILA
The University of Sto. Tomas (UST), which is considered the oldest existing
university in Asia, is a Dominican-run learning institution established in 1616.
Three Spanish professors have pioneered the teaching of psychology in UST, and
these were Jose A. Samson, a Ph.D. degree holder in Psychology, Emmanuel Vit
Samson, a doctor of medicine, and Angel de Blas, a Dominican priest and
philosopher. Jose Samson instituted the clinical setting of the UST psychology
curriculum. Emmanuel Vit Samson became the Chairman of the department
from 1954 to 1972. Fr. Blas was the head of the Psychology department and
founder of UST Experimental Psychology laboratory. Under his leadership, the
department’s direction leaned towards medical and physiological based. Filipino
Psychology became an integral part of UST's undergraduate psychology in 1987
under the leadership of then Chairperson Dolores de Leon, an alumna of UST
where she studied advanced training in Clinical psychology. Another Dominican-
run learning institution founded in 1630, Colegio de San Juan de Letran, holds
the distinction of being the only school in Southeast Asia that offered a
Psychology course taught in Spanish up to the mid-1970s.
References
Enriquez, V. (1985 ). The Development of Psychological Thought in the
Philippines In Aganon, A. and David, M.A. (ed), New Directions in
Indigenous Psychology, Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Isyu, Pananaw, at
Kaalaman (pp. 149-176). Quezon City: National Book Store
Course Module