You are on page 1of 152

AASHTO CULVERT AND STORM DRAIN

SYSTEM INSPECTION GUIDE

Jesse L. Beaver, P.E.


Principal, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
28 August 2018

© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz


28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
Agenda

• Introduction: speaker bio and company profile


• Background
• AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain System Inspection Guide
• Section 1 – Introduction
• Section 2 – Design and performance characteristics
• Section 3 – Inspection procedure
• Section 4 – Condition rating system
• Section 5 – Asset management
• Appendices

2
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Speaker Bio: Mr. Jesse L. Beaver, PE, P.Eng
• Principal, Engineering Mechanics & Infrastructure Division, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc., Waltham, MA
• Buried pipe experience:
• Principal Investigator, NCHRP 14-26, Culvert & Storm Drain System Inspection Manual
• Buried pipe design and investigation; development of pipe structural design methods, materials/products
testing; municipal standards development; construction support
• Related activities:
• Chair, Transportation Research Board (TRB) AFF70 Culverts & Hydraulic Structures
• Chair, ASTM F17.65 Plastic Pipes, Land Drainage; Member: ASTM A05 Metal Pipe and F17 Plastic Pipe
• Instructor, Design of Buried Pipes, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Continuing Education
• Registered Professional Engineer: Approximately 20 US States and 4 Canadian Provinces
• Education:
• MSCE, Structural Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
• BSCE, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
• AA, University of Maryland, Augsburg, Germany
3
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
• Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. (SGH)
• http://www.sgh.com/
• Founded by three MIT professors in 1956
• Dr. Howard Simpson, Mr. Werner Gumpertz, Dr. Frank Heger
• 600+ staff, 9 office locations in 6 states
• CA, DC, IL, MA, NY, TX

4
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Background: NCHRP Project 14-26
• Project Completed: March 2016
• Objective: Develop an inspection manual for assessing the condition of in-service
culvert and storm drain systems to ensure system safety and performance and the
economical use of owner resources
• Oversight Panel: DOT, FHWA, Manufacturers, Industry, Engineers, Academia
• SGH Team: Jesse Beaver (PI), Matthew Richie (PM), Robert Keene
• Final Deliverable: Culvert and Storm Drain System Inspection Manual
• Replacement for 1986 FHWA Culvert Inspection Manual
• Adopted by AASHTO in June 2018 as a Guide
• Publication expected early 2019
• http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=3172
5
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Background: Terminology

• Culverts
• Buried structures
• Designed to allow passage of water under roadways, railways, or embankments
• Can be structurally similar to bridges, with total span less than 20 ft
• Storm Drains
• Typically low-head or gravity flow
• Closed-end conduits with inlet and outlet structures and in-line junction boxes
• Convey stormwater from impervious surfaces to collection and discharge points
• Highway bridges
• “Culverts” with spans ≥ 20 ft, including multi-barrel with spacing less than D/2
• Federally mandated inspection every 2 yrs; state-specific policies vary with some treating 10ft span
and up as bridges
• Culverts outnumber bridges significantly, with numbers approaching 10 to 1
• No federally mandated (or funded) inspection cycle
• Many are not contained in any formal database and go uninspected for years until failure
6
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Background: 1986 Culvert Inspection Manual

• Materials:
• Precast Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP)
• Cast-in-place (CIP) Concrete
• Corrugated/Structural Plate Steel
• Corrugated Aluminum
• Stone Masonry
• What about plastic?

7
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
28 August 2018
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Background: 1986 Culvert Inspection Manual

• Materials:
• Precast Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP)
• Cast-in-place (CIP) Concrete
• Corrugated/Structural Plate Steel
• Corrugated Aluminum
• Stone Masonry
• What about plastic?

8
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
28 August 2018
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Background: Local Inspection Programs
• Some jurisdictions have developed specifications and hired consultants for culvert
inspections - Colorado
• Many jurisdictions have developed their own manuals (or used bridge inspection
manuals to inspect culverts) - Minnesota, Federal Lands Highways, New York State,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Ohio
• Some states have developed training and/or certification courses for their culvert
inspection programs - Ohio, Minnesota, California

9
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Background: How do States Manage Culverts?
• Inventory Management Systems
• Catalog and track infrastructure
assets
• Identify the infrastructure asset
value
• Effective systems include:
inventory, inspection,
management/documentation,
planning, budgeting, decision-
making

Data from January 2007 questionnaire


sent to state bridge engineers.

10
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide

11
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Organization of the Inspection Guide
• Section 1 – Introduction
• Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics
• Appendix A – Structural Shapes, Materials, and System
Components
• Section 3 – Inspection Procedure
• Section 4 – Condition Rating System
• Appendix B – Catalog of Distressed Conditions
• Section 5 – Asset Management
Roadway collapse due to piping along
culvert and loss of backfill

12
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide
Section 1 - Introduction
13
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 1 – Introduction
Overview:
• Introduces culvert and storm drain system
inspection
• Outlines need for standardized inspection
program
• Provides the objectives of the guide
• Identifies the intended audience
• Instructs users on the guide organization and
Roadway collapse due to structural failure of culvert
use for inspections

14
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 1 – Introduction
Objectives of the Guide:
• Quantitative and consistent condition rating criteria based on engineering principles and existing best
practices
• Enable culvert and storm drain inspectors to:
• Identify structural distress for culvert or storm drain system components
• Rate the condition of the system components
• Document findings of an inspection
• Recommend basic corrective actions or notifications where appropriate
• Present methods for owners to justify repair funding requests and to prioritize rehabilitation
programs
• Update the 1986 manual with contemporary information

15
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 1 – Introduction
Goals of the Guide:
• Evaluate structural integrity, hydraulic performance, and roadside compatibility
• Identify minor issues that can be addressed through maintenance before they become safety hazards
• Mitigate repair costs
• Reduce risk of unexpected failure
• Provide input to prioritize rehabilitation and maintenance
• Allow for short- and long-term planning and budgeting for repairs and rehabilitation
• Provide a method to meet state and federal requirements to quantify the value of highway
infrastructure assets
• Provide input to load rating procedures

16
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 1 – Introduction
Target audience:
• Highway departments
• State highway agencies (DOTs)
• County Highway Divisions
• Local agencies
• Personnel
• Culvert and storm drain system inspectors and bridge
inspectors
• Consultants to highway agencies responsible for culvert
and storm drain system inspection
• Personnel responsible for performing scheduled
maintenance on culvert and storm drain systems

17
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide
Section 2 – Design and Performance
Characteristics
18
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Overview:
• Introduces factors that affect structural
and functional performance
• Describes design characteristics
• Provides structure shapes, materials, and
coatings
• Describes culvert and storm drain
components

19
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Contents:
• Design Characteristics
• Hydraulic Requirements
• Structural Behavior – Flexible vs. Rigid
• Loads on Culverts and Storm Drains
• Construction and Installation Requirements
• Performance Characteristics
• Durability
• Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components
• Refer to Appendix A for additional details

20
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Hydraulic Requirements


• Design is based on size, shape, alignment, end treatments, elevations
• Storm drain system considerations - detention, retention, infiltration
• Consider debris control, sedimentation, inlet/outlet protection

Example drainage area Factors affecting hydraulic capacity Outlet protection


(estimate runoff) (hydraulic design)
21
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Structural Behavior


• Behavior of flexible culvert barrels
• Deflect to carry load, typically 3% - 8%, depending on material/type, load, and installation details;
surrounding embedment soil supports pipe

Deflection of flexible culverts Schematic load in flexible culverts


22
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Structural Behavior


• Behavior of rigid culvert barrels
• No significant deflection, load is carried by wall compression
and resistance to bending

Zones of tension and compression in rigid


pipes developed to resist vertical load Three edge bearing test (TEB)
23
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Loads on Culverts & Storm Drains


• Live Load - AASHTO HL-93, Design Truck (HS-20), Tandem, Lane Load

DESIGN TRUCK AXLES

DESIGN TRUCK AND LANE LOAD

DESIGN TANDEM AND LANE LOAD

Live load distribution through fill


AASHTO HL-93 live load (pipe orientation may vary for storm drains)
24
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Loads on Culverts & Storm Drains


• Live Load – AREMA Cooper E-80

AREMA Cooper E80 Railway Loading Corrugated metal culvert below RR

25
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Construction and Installation Requirements


• Embankment has final grade above native grade

Embankment installation for buried culvert or storm drain

26
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Construction and Installation Requirements


• Trench installation is excavated below native grade

Trench installation for buried culvert or storm drain


27
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics

Design Characteristics: Construction and Installation Requirements


• Compaction and Side Support
• Trench Width
• Foundations and Bedding
• Minimum Depth of Fill
• Camber
• High Groundwater (flotation)

Camber in pipe to allow for settlement under high fill

28
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 2 – Design and Performance Characteristics
Performance Characteristics: Durability
• Corrosion of Metals
• Corrosion mechanisms, aggressive soils
• Degradation of Concrete
• Acid attack
• Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
• Sulfate attack
• Hydrogen Sulfide Attack Severe corrosion of
• Freeze-Thaw corrugated steel pipe (CSP)
• Impact Damage
• Corrosion of Reinforcing
• Degradation of Plastics
• Oxidation Degradation
• Environmental Stress Cracking
• Photo-Induced (UV) Degradation
• Thermal Degradation
• Chlorine-Induced Degradation
• Abrasion Corrosion of reinforcing steel in Degradation and cracking
reinforced concrete pipe (CSP) of plastic pipe (HDPE)
29
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide
Appendix A – Structural Shapes,
Materials, and System Components
30
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

Contents:
• Shapes
• Materials
• Culvert Systems and Components
• Storm Drain Systems and Components
• Pipe Coatings and Linings

31
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Shapes
• Circular
• Pipe Arch
• Box Culvert
• Arch
• Three-Sided
• Multi-Barrel/Multicell

32
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Shapes

Circular Pipe Arch Box

Arch Three-Sided Multi-Cell / Multi-Barrel


33
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Materials (common)
• Corrugated Steel and Aluminum
• Factory-Made Pipe Metal pipe corrugation nomenclature
• Structural Plate Steel
• Corrugated Box Culvert
• Long-Span Corrugated Structures
• Plastic
• Thermoplastic vs. Thermoset Resins
• HDPE, PVC, PP
• FRP
• SRPE
• Concrete
• Precast Shapes
• Cast-In-Place
• Fiber Reinforced Concrete Pipe
Long-span corrugated steel structure
(Corrugated Metal Shapes) 34
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Other Materials
• Solid Wall Steel Casing
• Cast and Ductile Iron
• Masonry
• Timber

Stone masonry barrel Timber barrel

35
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Culvert Systems and Components


• Approach Roadway and Embankment
• End Treatments
• Headwall, Spandrel, Wingwall
• Energy Dissipators Reinforced concrete
• Foundations spread footing

Headwall (arrow 1) and wingwall Reinforced concrete


(arrow 2) on concrete box mat foundation
36
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Culvert Systems and Components


• Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP)
• Stream Fragmentation
• Barriers to passage
• Excessive velocity
• Outlet configuration
• Insufficient depth
• Turbulence
• Excessive length/daylighting
• Sedimentation and structural
damage
• Characteristics for Design for AOP
• Brief discussion on AOP for Inventory
Management

37
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Storm Drain System Components


• Stormwater Collection
• Channels and Ditches
• Curbs and Gutter
• Inlets and Inlet Structures
• Stormwater Conveyance
• Storm drains
• Manholes and Access
• Junction boxes/Chambers Storm drain system components
• Inverted Siphons
• Pumps stations
• Best Management Practices

38
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Appendix A – Culvert and Storm Drain Shapes and System Components

• Pipe Coatings and Linings – Tables and Text


• Nonstructural Pipe Coatings and Linings
• Cement Mortar, Bituminous, Epoxy, Galvanized, Polymer, Invert Paving, Internal Joint Bands
• Structural Pipe Linings
• Sliplining, Multi-Plate or Structural Plate, Fold-and-Form PVC, Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP),
Spray-Applied, Spiral Wound, Swagelining and Rolldown, Pipe Bursting and Splitting

39
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide
Section 3 – Inspection Procedure
40
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures

Contents:
• General
• Purpose and Scope of Inspections
• Inspection Frequency
• Preparation and Planning
• Types of Inspections
• Types of Entry
• Inspection Team Role and Qualifications
• Inspection Equipment (separate slides after overview)
• Recording the Inspection
• Safety
• Inspection Quality Control and Quality Assurance

41
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures

Purpose:
• Assess the condition of the entire culvert or storm drain
system
• Structural issues
• Materials issues
• Service performance
• Make accurate ratings that are repeatable by other
inspectors
• Collect data to be included in an agency’s asset
management system
• Used for maintenance, repair, rehabilitation
decisions/budgets, and load rating
• Collect data that assess roadway safety for the traveling
public

42
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
• Scope of Inspections:
• All culverts and storm drains in an agency’s inventory
• All systems should be inventoried upon installation, when
creating an asset management system, during maintenance, or
during minor roadway work
• Many culverts may not require routine inspection such as small
diameter pipes or low traffic areas
• Each agency should define its inspection program in
terms of:
• Inspection frequency
• Characteristics of culverts to be inventoried and inspected
(importance)
• The information to be collected

43
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Inspection Frequency:
• Defined by agency, each state should weigh their risks in developing a state-specific inspection
frequency.
• Culverts with spans > 20 ft are bridges are inspected every 2 yrs under NBIS
• New installations should be inspected within 30 days of completion
• Example frequency by barrel span:

Barrel Size (S) Inspection Frequency


S < 4 ft Inspect during roadway maintenance.
Every 10 years or prior to routine roadway maintenance
4 ft ≤ S ≤ 10 ft
activities, whichever is less.
Every 5 years or prior to routine roadway maintenance activities,
S > 10 ft
whichever is less.

44
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Preparation and Planning:
• Organize and schedule inspections while
considering:
• Inspection type and frequency for each structure
• Review of prior condition and reports
• Selection of proper equipment and inspection forms
• Evaluation of site access, safety, and availability of
emergency response
• Seasonal conditions
• Other planned maintenance (routine cleaning, roadway
work, etc.)
• Environmental conditions, permits, notification of land
owners
• Ensure inspections are completed during planning for
any roadway maintenance or construction activities
45
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Preparation and Planning:
• Review of Inventory and Data from
Previous Inspections
• Review inspection reports, plans
• Review AOP or other site-specific special
designs
• Consider job hazards and mitigation of
hazards in selection of personal protective
equipment (PPE), inspection methodology,
access, and coordination with other entities
• Check the weather and topography
• Consult aerial photos/ street views for steep
terrain, thick vegetation, etc.

46
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Preparation and Planning:
• Develop an Inspection Sequence
• General observations of the approach
roadway and structure
• Select one end and inspect embankment,
waterway (e.g., channel alignment, high
water marks), end treatments, culvert barrel
• Then move to the other end
• Use a Checklist or Developed Procedure
• Defines the minimum steps for the inspection
• Reduces error, improves quality
• Provides a record of what can (and cannot)
be inspected

47
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Types of Inspections:
• Initial (Inventory) Inspection
• Detailed first inspection establishes agency inventory record
• Baseline for future comparison
• Provide data required for agency asset management decisions
• Routine Inspection
• On defined frequency, visual and non-destructive
measurements to assess condition and assign ratings
• Note changes to inventory baseline
• Track how components are functioning and aging
• Special Inspection
• Triggered by critical or failed rating in a routine inspection
• Research to monitor new materials, special detailing, etc.
• Damage Inspection Special Inspection triggered by flooding event,
• Emergency inspection - flooding, fires, roadway sinkholes, severe damage to roadway and embankment
traffic accidents
• Determine if emergency restrictions/critical repairs are
required
48
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Types of Entry:
• Person-Entry Internal Inspection (preferred)
• Component ratings require close-up inspection
• Follow OSHA and local confined space entry procedures
• Non-Entry Internal Inspection
• Visually examine structure from both ends (less thorough) Person-entry inspection
• Identifies significant problems in barrel, etc.
• Outlet observations may be representative of worst-case
abrasion, etc.
• Remote-Entry Internal Inspection
• When internal inspection is necessary but person-entry is
not practical - small diameter, deep sedimentation, deep
water, closed-end conduits
• Preferred to have video plus other specialized
measurement equipment Non-entry inspection
49
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Inspector Role and Training:
• Role of Inspector
• Inspectors perform the routine inspections, including assignment of component condition ratings
using the tables in Section 4
• Training by the guide and on-the-job experience
• Basic familiarity and understanding of culvert and storm drain system function, including hydraulic
performance, structural behavior
• Understanding of failure modes, critical inspection points, and the condition rating system
described in this guide
• Ability to read and interpret plans, construction documents, and inspection reports
• Working knowledge of inspection tools, their use, application, and limitations
• Appropriately trained to agency safety requirements for site access and culvert entry
• Physical Ability
• Be prepared to work in demanding conditions including cramped spaces, rugged terrain, steep
embankments, in and around water
• Able to carry tools and equipment
50
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Recording the Inspection:
• Inventory Record
• Design and installation records
• Assigned structure identification number
• Location, type, span, etc.
• Road and stream/feature crossed by the
structure
• If no inventory data is available on existing
culverts, establish guidelines to prioritize
collection methods for maintenance, paving,
and construction staff

51
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Recording the Inspection:
• Inspection Record
• Standardization is important
• Agencies should have standard forms to
suit their asset management needs
• Forms should include space for:
• Relevant data from previous
inspections (identify components that
may need particular attention)
• Fields for different features
• Sketches and narrative description
• Photo references
• Condition ratings/comments

52
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Safety:
• Safety of the inspection team and the public is important
when planning and conducting inspections
• Establish appropriate safety practices which comply with
all federal, state, local municipality, and agency regulations
• Topics include:
• Confined space entry (permit and non-permit)
• Traffic hazards
• Drowning hazards
• Rugged terrain
• Animals and insects
• Poisonous plants
Hazardous conditions in embankment
• Equipment safety
above culvert
• Other hazards (fire, floods, chemical spills, etc.)
53
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Inspection Tools and Equipment:
• Tools and Equipment for Access
• Tools for Cleaning
• Tools for Inspection and Measurement
• Tools for Visual Aid
• Tools for Documentation of Condition
• Miscellaneous Tools and Equipment

54
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Tools and Equipment: Access
• Inspection Vehicle
• GPS
• Locate outlet end
• Devices with geotagging capabilities also useful
(e.g., smartphone)
• Ladders or lifts
• Initial access
• Access crown or other high areas such as
headwalls, shoulders
• Harness and tripod if access through vertical manhole Tools and equipment for access
• Ropes and carabiners to lower tools
• Rubber boots, waders, small boat
• Probe to check for voids beneath water surface
• Manhole lid hook
55
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Tools and Equipment: Cleaning
• Whisk broom/rags to remove debris
• Wire brush to remove loose paint and corrosion
• Scrapers (5-in-1 tool) to remove corrosion/growth
from surfaces
• Flathead screwdriver for general cleaning of surfaces
and probing
• Shovel to remove soil and debris
• Machete or other cutting tool to clear overgrowth
Tools for cleaning

56
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Tools and Equipment: Inspection and Measurement
• Chipping hammer/pry bar
• Loosen dirt and rust scale
• Sound concrete
• Check for sheared/loose fasteners
• Probe (screw driver/other)
• Check for scour holes, voids behind joints, etc.
• Pocket or utility knife
• Ice pick
• Timber surface examination Tools for inspection and measurement
• Concrete deterioration depth
• Steel corrosion extent
• Timber boring tools
• Plumb bob
• Measure vertical alignment or barrel lateral racking
57
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Tools and Equipment: Inspection and Measurement
• 25 and 100 ft tape measures, measuring wheel
• Calipers, micrometer, crack width comparator, pit depth
gage
• Paint film gage
• Carpenter’s level with digital inclinometer
• Electronic distance meter
• Line level and stringline
• Utility knife for marking/ scoring Crack width comparator

58
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Tools and Equipment: Visual Aid
• Binoculars
• Preview areas prior to inspection
• Observe members/features at a distance
• High powered flashlight and head lamp
• Lighted magnifying glass
• Close examination of cracks
• Inspection mirrors
• Observe inaccessible areas Tools for visual aid
• Reflect sunlight into dark areas for non-entry inspection
(e.g., from ends of culverts into barrel)

59
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Tools and Equipment: Documentation of Condition
• Inspection forms, clipboard, tablet computer
• Digital camera with optical zoom, flash, macro capability
• Field books with waterproof paper
• Straight edge
• Sketching
• Depth measurements from surface
• Chalk, lumber crayon (keel), paint sticks/markers, Sharpie
• Center punch
• Reference marks to metal members for repeatable Tools for documentation of condition
measurements

60
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Inspection Tools and Equipment: Miscellaneous
• Hard hat, glasses, dust masks, respirators, proper
footwear, coveralls, gloves (PPE)
• Traffic safety equipment
• First aid kit, insect repellant, wasp/hornet spray
• pH test meter or kit
• Soil resistivity meter
• Surveying equipment (not typically necessary)
Personal protective equipment

61
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection (NDI):
• Evaluate conditions or characterize a material without damage, typically using electronic devices
• Nondestructive testing (NDT) and nondestructive evaluation (NDE), often used interchangeably
• Usually not necessary for routine inspections
• Advanced distress or special features may require a closer look
• Conduct limited physical measurements to validate NDI methods, then, if validated, proceed
with NDI for remainder of measurements
• For example, measure diameter with tape measure to establish comparison data point, then
continue with laser profilometer

62
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Laser Profilometer
• Scans interior surface of the barrel
• Can include projection and image capture by camera (trailing behind laser)
• Can include direct measurement by laser (e.g., rotating head to develop point cloud)
• Results can be used to measure and see barrel alignment, joint alignment, barrel deflection,
local curvature, and surface distress (sometimes crack dimensions)

© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved 63


28 August 2018 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Ultrasonic Thickness (UT) Gage
• Measure thickness of solid metal and plastic materials
• Can be used to measure localized section loss due
to corrosion in steel pipe and delamination depth
in FRP pipe
• Works by measuring the time it takes for a sound pulse
to travel through a test piece of known material
• Sound waves are reflected from the material boundary,
timing of the echo from the far side is used to
determine thickness
• Requires material calibration (e.g., block of similar
material at known thickness or at cut edge and
measured with calipers)
• Allows for thickness measurement with single-side
access after calibration
64
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Borescope/Videoscope
• Small video camera attached to a flexible tube
• < 0.5 in. diameter
• Up to ~50 ft long
• Integral light
• Handheld display with controls to articulate camera (on some models)
• Allows for inspection of inaccessible areas
• Behind a pipe wall into a void
• Inside smaller diameter pipes
• Inside a joint, etc.
• Requires an access point/hole

65
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)
• Short pulse of high frequency electromagnetic waves into
a material
• Records the amplitude and phase shift of the reflected
response
• Reflections are produced when the pulse passes
between materials of different dielectric constants
• Large changes in dielectric constants are easiest to locate
(e.g., steel and concrete; air and concrete)
• Can be used to determine thickness, reinforcement
location, voids, condition, buried structure location
• Sensitive to moisture
• Different moisture conditions may require
recalibration even at same location
• Experience is necessary
66
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Cover Meter
• Used on concrete structures to determine rebar location,
bar size, thickness of concrete cover
• Creates electromagnetic fields with coils, detects changes
in coil current when metal objects are near
• Good accuracy and lower cost when compared to GPR
• Underlying layers are hidden, works with ferrous metals
only

67
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Infrared (Thermographic) Imaging
• Camera that measures the thermal energy emitted by an
object and converts it to an image in the visible light spectrum
• Maximize usefulness through proper timing (or provide
external heat source)
• Field operation and data analysis require some experience
• Can be used to locate leaks in buried pipe walls, geometric
distress in concrete members, and delaminations in FRP

Delamination
Concrete Slab
68
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Impact-Echo Testing
• Impact applied to a surface and reflected stress waves are
measured
• Requires a relatively smooth surface, 2 to 18 in. thick
• Field operation and data analysis require some experience
• Can be used on concrete members to measure thickness,
locate internal flaws/distress
• Honeycombing, voids, cracks, delaminations, etc.
• In some cases, can locate voids behind walls

69
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - UAVs)
• UAVs, typically with cameras, operated by a pilot on
the ground using a remote control
• Real-time video monitoring and recording capabilities
• Becoming common in bridge inspections for difficult
access areas
• Can be used for culvert inspections for close-up
inspection of soffits in large-span culverts, areas over
active stream flow, areas in confined spaces, and
others
• Models include protective cages to move through
smaller spaces

70
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment:
• Remote Entry Equipment
• For use where person-entry cannot be feasibly
accomplished
• Storm drains (i.e., permit required confined spaces)
• Small diameter culverts
• Common tools include:
• Remote-controlled vehicles with closed circuit
television (CCTV)
• Laser profilometers
• Inclinometers
• Sonar for underwater areas
• Intelligent pigging
Remote inspection with camera (top) and
screenshot from CCTV (bottom)
71
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inspection Procedures
Nondestructive inspection equipment: Remote entry equipment
• Remote Vehicles with CCTV
• Real-time, high-definition video record for later viewing and analysis with 360° rotation
• Distance should be measured and recorded on screen
• Software should have ability to provide operator comments of observations associated with
video and/or still photos
• Optical Scanning
• Similar to CCTV, but high resolution cameras provide an “unfolded” image of pipe interior
• Inclinometer
• Measures slope usually of the invert along the length of the structure
• May be coupled with remote vehicle/CCTV
• Sonar
• Submersible equipment that sends out sound waves to evaluate shape, identify and measure
wall distress (pits, voids, cracks), and identify debris buildup
• Can be coupled with camera and laser profilometer above the waterline, and sonar below
72
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
73
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Contents:
• Use of the Condition Rating System
• Approach Roadway
• Embankment
• Channel
• End Treatments and Appurtenances
• Concrete Footing and Invert Slab
• Barrel Alignment
• Plastic, Concrete, Corrugated Metal, (Masonry, and Timber) Barrels
• Joints and Seams
• Storm Drain System Components
• Manholes, Catch Basins, Buried Junctions
• Aquatic Organism Passage

74
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Use of the Condition Rating System:
• Rating Scale of 1 to 4
• 1 (Good) is like new, little or no deterioration, structurally sound, functionally adequate with
no action required
• 4 (Severe) indicates possible imminent failure with urgent corrective action required
• Ratings based on comparison of the existing condition with the as-designed condition and are
assigned before leaving the site
• Each component gets a rating; no overall structure rating
• The poorest characteristic rating (highest number) determines the component rating
• Where quantified criteria are provided, measurements may be required
• If the provided table criteria are not adequate, judgement and experience may be used to
assign a rating
• NR rating for inaccessible component to indicate “Not Rated” (provide description)
• Appendix B Catalog of Distressed Conditions shows photographs of varying levels of distress
severity to allow assignment of consistent ratings between inspectors and over time

75
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System

76
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Use of the Condition Rating System:
• Assign general thresholds for each inspection criterion to determine its rating and therefore any
corrective action
• Base the thresholds on:
• Engineering principles related to design
• What can be easily measured and quantified in the field
• Other than for observed failures, ratings do not lead to an immediate call for remediation or
replacement
• Poor ratings typically lead to further engineering evaluation
• Criteria is based on rapid assessment of condition

77
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Use of the Condition Rating System:
• Documentation Convention
• Distress Severity
• Document severity, extent, and location of significant and typical distress
• Include photos and sketches as necessary
• Adequate for follow-up inspections
• Distress Location
• Identify outlet end GPS coordinates
• Use offsets (stationing) along pipe length from outlet end
• Use clock positions looking upstream from outlet or offsets from corners of box culvert, etc.
• Joint Distress
• Identify offset/stationing rather than counting joint numbers to allow for location
identification after lining, barrel extensions, etc.

78
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Use of the Condition Rating System:
• Component Condition Rating Tables:
• Approach Roadway
• Embankment
• Channel Alignment and Protection
• End Treatments and Appurtenant Structures
• Concrete Footings and Invert Slab
• Barrel Alignment
• Plastic Barrel
• Concrete Barrel
• Corrugated Metal Barrel
• Masonry Barrel
• Timber Barrel
• Joints
• Seams
• Manholes, Catch Basins, Buried Junctions 79
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Approach Roadway:
• Approach roadway is the length of roadway,
shoulder, and guardrail above the buried
culvert or storm drain system that is
influenced directly by the performance of the
buried system
• Purpose:
• Identify roadway distress indicators for
problems with the culvert or storm drain
below and often to locate the buried
structure
• Not intended for pavement condition Approach roadway inspection length
inspection

80
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Definition of Distress Type
Approach Roadway:
• What to Look For:
• Pavement distress
Quantitative Measure of Distress Type
• Flexible vs rigid pavement
• Settlement (sags, humps, rutting)
• Pavement maintenance history
(repeated patching)
• Infiltration, loss of backfill
support Example of
Distress
Type

Left: high severity transverse pavement cracks


Right: high severity longitudinal pavement cracks
81
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Approach Roadway:

Pavement failure due to inadequate embedment soil compaction


or low-quality embedment soil adjacent to flexible pipe

Pavement failure due to inadequate soil compaction or


low-quality fill soil adjacent to rigid pipe
82
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Approach Roadway:
• Surface distress indicators

(A) Backfill Loss Beneath Pavement Causing Sag in the Approach Roadway (A.1)
(B) Large Void Beneath Pavement Due to Backfill Loss, Discovered by Probing Small Hole (B.1)
(A.2 and B.2) Resulting backfill infiltration inside barrel
83
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System

Evaluate need Corrective


for action action required 84
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

85
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

86
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

87
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

88
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

89
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

90
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Embankment:
• Inspection focuses on immediate slope
area that provides burial for the culvert,
20 ft either side of culvert
• Purpose:
• Identify conditions that may be
distress indicators for the structure
• Must be paired with findings from
other components

Embankment sloughing

91
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Definition of Distress Type

Embankment:
• What to Look For:
• Slope stability Quantitative
• Sloughing, tension cracks Measure of
• Embankment Erosion Distress Type
• Sheet Erosion, gullying/rill erosion,
piping
Example of
Distress Type

Moderate sheet erosion on steep embankment

92
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System

93
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Channel:
• The channel consists of the stream,
streambed, and adjacent banks.
• Purpose:
• Identify channel-related problems that
may affect the performance or
structural integrity or stability of the
culvert.
Change in stream alignment causing flow to be directed into wingwall

94
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Channel:
• What to Look For:
• Channel Alignment
• Horizontal alignment, vertical
alignment
• Bank erosion and scour
• Protection
• Waterway adequacy (non-AOP)
• High water marks Sedimentation: fair (left), poor (middle), severe (right)
• Drainage area
• Sedimentation and debris

95
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
End Treatments and Appurtenances:
• Purpose:
• Identify conditions that may relate to
their structural stability, hydraulic
performance, and traffic safety
characteristics
• What to Look for:
• Projecting ends
• Changes to prefabricated end treatments
Left: wingwall severe condition (cracking, movement)
• Issues with headwalls/spandrel
Right: wingwall has progressed from severe to failed after rain event
walls/wingwalls
• Issues with aprons and flumes, debris
accumulations
• Issues with weep holes, etc.
96
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Footing and Invert Slab:
• Purpose
• Identify distress and distress indicators that
result in foundation problems for three-sided
and other structures. Differential footing settlement

• What to Look for:


• Differential settlement
• Scour and stability
• Concrete deterioration

Differential settlement of footing


supporting corrugated metal arch
97
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Barrel Alignment:
• Purpose
• Identify distress indicators that result in
misalignment of pipe segments and may
reduce hydraulic performance
Severe visible sag in vertical alignment causing ponding
• What to Look for:
• Misalignment
• Vertical and horizontal

Severe vertical misalignment resulting in joint offset


and loss of support to embedment soil 98
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Barrel:
• Purpose:
• Identify distress in the barrel that may affect
structural stability or functional performance
• Focus on structural, functional, and durability issues
(alignment and joints covered separately)
• Rate each barrel based on its level of distress (if any)
and tie the rating to specific actions
• Materials covered
• Plastic Barrel
• Concrete Barrel
• Corrugated Metal Barrel (not covered)
• Masonry Barrel (not covered)
• Timber Barrel (not covered)
99
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Plastic Barrel (HDPE, PVC, PP, FRP):
• What to Look For:
• Shape
• Deflection, deformation
• Surface Damage
• Wear/Abrasion Minor photodegradation of end section
• UV Degradation
• Wall Distress
• Local Buckling
• Splitting
• Cracking

100
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System

101
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Plastic Barrel:
• Basis for Rating Limits
• Recall the relationship between vertical deflection (ΔA) and flexural wall strain (εf) from
thermoplastic pipe design (see AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications):

• Allowable vertical deflection, ΔA, is typically set at 5% in design and construction specifications
• The deflection from circumferential shortening, εscD, must be accounted when converting ΔA,
which can be measured in the field, to Δf, which is the reduction in vertical diameter from flexure
• If εscD is constant, as ΔA increases, the flexural strain, εf, increases linearly
• Flexural strain is combined with axial (hoop) strain, εuc, and compared to the design strain limit
• If deflection increases, strains increase and can approach or exceed the design strain limit

102
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Plastic Barrel:
• Basis for Rating Limits

• Thermoplastic pipes are typically designed for a range of cover heights (e.g., 2 to 20 ft)
• Most installations are not at the limiting cover height
• In-service loads are typically less than the design loads
• Engineering evaluation may show an in-service pipe with greater than 5% deflection to still
have the full safety factor
• If deflection increases enough to cause strains beyond the strain limit, the safety factor will
be reduced
103
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Plastic Barrel:
• Basis for Rating Limits

• Surface damage cannot cause a failed rating


• Some level of surface damage will not cause structural or functional distress
• Key to the surface damage plastic barrel rating criterion is tracking with time
• If, in subsequent inspections, wear or abrasion causes increased section loss, or UV
degradation progresses, limits are established to track the rating progression and provide a
trigger point for engineering evaluation or required corrective action

104
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Plastic Barrel:
• Basis for Rating Limits

• Thermoplastic pipes will show some local buckling (accounted for in design)
• Widespread local buckling may indicate loads greater than anticipated
• Vertical loads are directly related to axial strain
• Similar to flexural strain, there may be reserve capacity based on the installation not being at
a critical cover height
• An increase in axial strain beyond the design limit will reduce the design safety factor
105
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

106
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

107
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

108
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Appendix B

109
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Barrel:
• What to look for:
• Cracking
• Longitudinal, circumferential, vertical,
offsets
Results of poor and good side support in rigid pipe
• Spalling
• Delamination
• Slabbing
• Deterioration
• Abrasion, chemical attack, freeze-thaw
• Clogged weep holes

Cracks with radial offset


110
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Barrel:
• Spalling
• Fair – spalls are not greater than
1/2 in. in depth and less than 6 in. in
diameter or longest dimension; no
exposed rebar
• Poor – spalls are not greater than
3/4 in. in depth and larger than 6 in. in
diameter or longest dimension; no
exposed rebar
• Severe – spalls are greater than 3/4 in.
in depth with exposed rebar Left: small spall along crack
Right: large spall with exposed/corroded rebar

111
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Barrel:
• Delamination is separation along a plane
parallel to a surface; slabbing is a radial failure
of concrete due to action of rebar in tension
with inadequate competent concrete cover
• Freeze-thaw distress is due to the action of Severe freeze-thaw deterioration
expanding/contracting water that has been
absorbed by the concrete; de-icing chemicals
can work with freeze-thaw to cause surface
scaling

Slabbing in concrete pipe


112
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Barrel:

Moderate deterioration (possible chemical attack) Severe deterioration (possible chemical


with exposed aggregate and loss of surface mortar attack) with complete loss of invert

113
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System

114
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Barrel:
• Basis for rating:
• Recall from rigid pipe behavior:
• Concrete culvert and storm drain barrels do not bend or deflect appreciably under load
before cracking or fracturing
• Adequate stability of surrounding soil, particularly below a pipe or box, is necessary to
prevent excessive stresses that would lead to cracks
• Measurements of crack widths are an indication of the structural condition of the concrete
structure
• Wide cracks allow water and oxygen to penetrate the wall and access the rebar, which can initiate
corrosion
• Corrosion is expansive and can eventually lead to spalling and structural distress

115
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System

Crack Width AASHTO Construction Specs Culvert & Storm Drain Barrel Rating
(in.) (intended for new structures)
≤ 0.01 Note in report 1- Good, no action
0.01 to 0.05 Measure in detail, measure diameters 2- Fair, no immediate action
0.05 to 0.1 Measure in detail, measure diameters 3- Poor, evaluate need for corrective action
> 0.1 Consider repair 4- Severe, corrective action required
Offset Cracks Repair or replace 4- Severe, corrective action required
116
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Barrel:
• Basis for rating:

• For the spalling, slabbing, delamination, and patches rating criterion, the key is to generally not
expose or affect rebar
• Trigger for poor rating and corrective action
• 6 in. or larger in diameter spall/delamination greater than 3/4 in. deep (likely still within
concrete cover) or patches that are delaminated or deteriorating
• Trigger for severe rating and corrective action
• Widespread spalling greater than 3/4 in. deep (concrete cover is gone), delamination
with exposed rebar, or slabbing
117
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Concrete Barrel:
• Basis for rating:

• For the deterioration rating criterion, the key is to generally not expose or affect rebar
• Trigger for poor rating and corrective action
• Exposed aggregate, deep and widespread abrasion, or impact damage with exposed
rebar
• Trigger for severe rating and corrective action
• Extensive surface damage, loose or missing aggregate, exposed/corroded rebar, or loss
of invert
118
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Manholes, Catch Basins, and
Buried Junctions:
• What to Look For:
• Material degradation
• Settlement, joint with pipe
• Ladder condition
• Sedimentation and debris
• Use materials ratings from barrel
evaluation tables, e.g., concrete
pipe barrel

Manhole and access ladder Catch basin diagram

119
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 4 – Condition Rating System
Aquatic Organism Passage:
• Not explicitly covered; refer to specific AOP plan if
applicable
• AOP not historically considered in design or inspection
• Culverts can result in barriers and stream fragmentation
• Common barriers include:
• Excessive velocity
• Outlet configuration (drops)
• Turbulence
• Insufficient depth
• Excessive lengths (darkness)
• Debris and sediment
• Culvert damage (can prevent fish from passing)

120
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide
Section 5 – Asset Management
121
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 5 – Asset Management
Contents:
• General
• Transportation Asset Management
• Best Practices for Developing an Asset Management Plan

122
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 5 – Asset Management
General:
• Gather information, prioritize and schedule maintenance and repair
• Well established for bridges and pavement
• Not well established for culvert and storm drain systems
• Older culverts and storm drains may not be cataloged or even show up on plans
• Agencies have traditionally relied on maintenance personnel to observe, report, and address
problems in a reactionary manner rather than proactively
• Proactive management can extend lifespans and better utilize resources

123
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 5 – Asset Management
Transportation Asset Management:
• Makes an account of inventory and maintenance to prolong the service life of highway assets
• Weigh costs and benefits of maintenance with importance of structure and performance goals to
prioritize and optimize actions
• Goals can be over an extended time horizon and draw from both economics and engineering
principles
• Allows for accountability and transparency in public funding

124
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 5 – Asset Management
Transportation Asset Management:
• GASB 34 (1999)
• Government Accounting Standards Board established new financial reporting requirements
for state and local governments
• States must capitalize infrastructure assets on financial statements
• Report the value
• Provide maintenance and replacement costs
• Include depreciated cost based on useful life of structure
• Assets do not have to be depreciated if they are being preserved at or above minimum
established conditions
• Only possible through regular inspection and documentation

125
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 5 – Asset Management
Transportation Asset Management:
• MAP 21 (2012)
• Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act signed into law
• Reforms transportation asset management
• Reduce federal budget deficit through better utilization of funds
• Only required for bridges (including culvert systems with total span ≥ 20 ft) and pavements,
but encouraged for other assets
• Requires states to develop a risk-based transportation asset management plan (TAMP)
• Weighs
• Engineering
• Life-cycle costs
• Risk analysis

126
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 5 – Asset Management
Guidance for Developing an
Asset Management Plan:

127
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Thank you!

AASHTO Guide for Inspection of Culvert and


Storm Drain Systems

Expected publication: February 2019


Mr. Jesse L. Beaver, PE, P.Eng, NCHRP 14-26 PI
41 Seyon Street, Building 1, Suite 500
Waltham, MA 02453
781-907-9272 (office)
JLBeaver@SGH.com
128
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
AASHTO Culvert and Storm Drain
System Inspection Guide
Useful Figures
129
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Listing of Figures
• Inventory and inspection forms (Section 3)
• Inspection and condition rating flowchart (Section 3)
• Condition rating tables (Section 4)

130
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Section 3 – Inventory and Inspection Forms
• Culvert and Storm Drain Inventory Form
• Culvert Inspection Form 1 of 3
• Culvert Inspection Form 2 of 3
• Culvert Inspection Form 3 of 3
• Storm Drain Inspection Form 1 of 2
• Storm Drain Inspection Form 2 of 2

131
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
Section 4 - Condition Rating Tables
• Approach Roadway
• Embankment
• Channel Alignment and Protection
• End Treatments and Appurtenance Structures
• Concrete Footings and Invert Slab
• Barrel Alignment
• Plastic Barrel
• Concrete Barrel
• Corrugated Metal Barrel
• Masonry Barrel
• Timber Barrel
• Joints
• Seams of Corrugated Metal Plate
• Manholes, Catch Basins, and Buried Junctions

138
28 August 2018 © 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.
© 2018 Jesse L. Beaver, All Rights Reserved Simpson Gumpertz
28 August 2018
& Heger Inc.

You might also like