You are on page 1of 12

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/258070572

Basement structure of southern Tunisia as determined from the analysis of


gravity data: implications for petroleum exploration

Article in Petroleum Geoscience · April 2012


DOI: 10.1144/1354-079311-050

CITATIONS READS

22 1,449

7 authors, including:

Hakim Gabtni Chokri Jallouli


Centre de Recherches et des Technologies des Eaux King Saud University
182 PUBLICATIONS 1,007 CITATIONS 69 PUBLICATIONS 970 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Kevin Mickus Mohamed Dhaoui


Missouri State University Center of Water Research and Technologies
258 PUBLICATIONS 2,349 CITATIONS 21 PUBLICATIONS 71 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Kevin Mickus on 18 June 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

Petroleum Geoscience

Basement structure of southern Tunisia as determined from the analysis


of gravity data: implications for petroleum exploration
Hakim Gabtni, Chokri Jallouli, Kevin L. Mickus, Mohamed Dhaoui, Mohamed Moncef
Turki, Mohammed Jaffal and Pierre Keating

Petroleum Geoscience 2012, v.18; p143-152.


doi: 10.1144/1354-079311-050

Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article
service
Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or part of this article
request
Subscribe click here to subscribe to Petroleum Geoscience or the Lyell Collection

Notes

© The Geological Society of London 2012


research-articlearticle18X10.1144/1354-079311-050H. GabtniBasement structure of southern Tunisia
2012

Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

Basement structure of southern tunisia as determined from the


analysis of gravity data: implications for petroleum exploration
Hakim Gabtni1, chokri Jallouli2, kevin l. Mickus3*, Mohamed dhaoui1,
Mohamed Moncef turki2, Mohammed Jaffal4 and Pierre keating5
1Laboratoitre
de Géoressources, Centre de Recherches et des Technologies des Eaux (CERTE),
BP 273, Soliman 8020, Tunisia
2Département de Géologie, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Université de Tunis El Manar,

2092 Manar II, Tunisia


3Department of Geosciences, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65897, USA
4Laboratoire de Géoressources, Département de Géologie, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Marrakech,

BP 549, Avenue Abdelkarim El Khattabi, Marrakech, Morocco


5Geological Survey of Canada, 601, Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada

*Corresponding author (e-mail: kevinmickus@missouristate.edu)

aBStract: Gravity data were analysed in the Ghadames Basin and surround-
ing regions in southern Tunisia in order to determine the basement structure
of the region and its relationship to petroleum exploration in relatively unex-
plored basins. The analysis included the construction of regional Bouguer grav-
ity anomaly and horizontal gravity gradient maps. These maps indicate that the
Ghadames Basin is not a simple sag basin but consists of a series of sub-basins
and uplifts. The northern boundary of the basin which we call the Telemzan–
Ghadames transition zone is marked by a NE-trending high amplitude grav-
ity gradient anomaly which decreases in amplitude toward the east and breaks
into a series of north–south- and east–west-trending anomalies implying a more
structurally complex region. When the known petroleum fields are overlain on
to the gravity gradient anomaly maps, the fields mostly occur along or next to
linear alignments of horizontal gravity gradient maxima. We interpret the cor-
relation of the petroleum fields and horizontal gravity gradient maxima to indi-
cate that the basement was involved in forming the petroleum traps. This study
illustrates that a regional gravity analysis can be useful in determining where
additional exploration can be applied in relatively unexplored basins.

IntroductIon 1992; Lyatsky 2000). To illustrate the use of gravity data in


determining the basement configuration of a potential petro-
The structural configuration of basement rocks has been shown leum province, we will use the Ghadames Basin of southern
to be an important component in the evolution of sedimentary Tunisia, northeastern Algeria and northwestern Libya.
basins and determining the location of many petroleum Specifically, we will analyse the Ghadames Basin of southern
resources (e.g. Brito Neves et al. 1984; Bernecker & Moore Tunisia which contains relatively few deep drill holes penetrat-
2003). Thus, the determination of the basement configuration ing basement and seismic reflection profiles.
under sedimentary basins is an integral part of any regional The Ghadames Basin is a large intracratonic sag basin
geological study, including hydrocarbon evaluations of the encompassing more than 350 000 km2 (Fig. 1) (Echikh 1998;
basin. In most cases, the basement is completely covered by a Klett 2000; Holt et al. 2010) and it is one in a series of cratonic
younger sedimentary sequence which makes determining the basins that occur within the Saharan platform, an early
location and nature of basement structures difficult. In these Palaeozoic passive margin that stretches for over 1600 km from
cases, the basement configuration is most commonly deter- Morocco to Egypt (Boote et al. 1998). In this paper, we show
mined by structural contour maps constructed from drill holes how an analysis of gravity data aided by sparse deep drills and
penetrating basement and seismic reflection profiles (e.g. widely scattered seismic reflection profiles can be used to deter-
Blundell 1983; Ross & Eaton 1999). Such maps aid in identify- mine the basement structure.
ing critical structural trends that might be related to the loca-
tion of potential hydrocarbon accumulations. One potential
difficulty is that especially in new frontier regions, drill hole
GeoloGIcal SettInG and BackGround
and seismic reflection data might not be available. In such
cases, the analysis of gravity and/or magnetic data are used to The current surface structural configuration of Tunisia has been
determine the structure on and within the basement (e.g. Edgell largely influenced by post-Palaeozoic tectonic events ranging

Petroleum Geoscience, Vol. 18, 2012, pp. 143–152 1354-0793/12/$15.00 © 2012 EAGE/Geological Society of London
DOI: 10.1144/1354-079311-050.
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

144 H. Gabtni et al.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic structural map of


Tunisia and adjacent regions (adapted after
Acheche et al. 2001). Solid lines show
the main structural features; (+) represents
the Precambrian lithologies of the Hoggar
region; TGT, Telemzan–Ghadames
transition zone. (b) Location of the study
area (a). Solid line A–B shows the location
of the regional cross-section (Fig. 2).

from the break-up of Pangaea (Permian to early Triassic), the by tectonic events in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The main tec-
Cretaceous convergence of Africa and Eurasia and alternating tonic elements bounding the basin are:
periods of extension and convergence during the Cenozoic
(Bouaziz et al. 2002; Holt et al. 2010). From these events, 1. the Telemzan High (Tunisia), the Touggourt High (Algeria)
Palaeozoic convergent tectonic events have been important in and the Nafousah High (Libya) to the north;
shaping the present structural configuration of the Ghadames 2. the Gargaf High and the Tihemboka arch (Libya), and the
Basin (Underdown & Redfern 2007a; Holt et al. 2010). The part Ahara High (Algeria) to the south;
of the basin found in southern Tunisia is characterized by a 3. the Hassi Massouad High to the west;
Precambrian metamorphic basement overlain by a thick, gently 4. and the western flank of the younger Sirte Basin and the
folded Palaeozoic sedimentary sequence (Jallouli & Mickus Hon Graben to the east.
2000). The geological boundary between northern (Cenozoic
deformation within the Atlas Mountains) and southern Tunisia Additionally, the Ghadames Basin is separated from the neigh-
(the Sahara Craton [part of the North African Craton] and the bouring Illizi Basin on the south by a series of low relief uplifts
Ghadames cratonic basin) is associated with a failed Palaeozoic– (e.g. Ahara High), which have experienced a complex tectonic
Mesozoic rift, the trace of which coincides with the North history involving structural inversion (Alem et al. 1998; Echikh
Saharan Flexure (Gabtni et al. 2005). In southern Tunisia, the 1998; Klett 2000). The structural features (1–4 listed above)
Sahara Craton can be broken into two broad regions: the thick have undergone a long tectonic history, beginning with the Late
sedimentary cover of the intracratonic Ghadames Basin in the Precambrian Pan African orogeny, and continuing throughout
south and the thin sedimentary cover of the Telemzan– Phanerozoic time with repeated reactivation of older structures.
Bounemcha High to the north (Fig. 1). The two regions are sep- The current architecture of the Ghadames Basin is the result of
arated by the Telemzan High–Ghadames Basin transition (TGT) the successive effects of several episodes of major tectonism
which is a regional-scale feature that may represent a basement related to the Caledonian (Devonian), Hercynian (Carboniferous),
discontinuity that has controlled the tectonic setting in the region Austrian (Early Cretaceous) and Alpine (Late Cretaceous–Early
since Palaeozoic time (Gabtni et al. 2006) (Fig. 1). Eocene) phases (Gabtni et al. 2006). Overall the evolution of the
The Ghadames Basin is one of a series of large sedimentary basin can be summarized in three main stages.
sag basins (including the Grand Erg and Illizi Basin) within the
North African craton. This basin, which contains up to 6 km of
1. Prior to the Hercynian orogeny, the North African craton was
Palaeozoic and Mesozoic sediments, has undergone a complex
the site of a large subsiding depositional basin formed during
and polyphase structural history since Ordovician time (Acheche
et al. 2001). The effect of several tectonic phases on the the Pan African and Caledonian orogenies, displaying little
Ghadames Basin has been the formation of a series of fault- regional differentiation, and formed through the reactivation of
bounded structural highs surrounding a central depression (Fig. Pan African fault systems (Van de Weerd & Ware 1994).
1). Backstripping modelling by Holt et al. (2010) has shown that 2. During the Hercynian orogeny the basin experienced uplift
the basin may have formed by lithospheric cooling and thicken- and erosion which resulted in large parts of the earlier Pal-
ing beneath a thin accretionary mantle lithosphere. Their model- aeozoic section being removed in most areas.
ling showed that the highest rates of subsidence occurred during 3. Lastly, the Alpine orogeny produced regional NW tilting of
the Palaeozoic, with little or no tectonic subsidence in the the sedimentary sequence, resulting in the superposition of
Mesozoic or Cenozoic. To a lesser degree, however, the final a Mesozoic extensional basin on the eroded remains of the
structural configuration of the basin continued to be influenced Palaeozoic basin (Van de Weerd & Ware 1994; Echikh 1998;
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

Basement structure of southern Tunisia 145

Fig. 2. Regional cross-section from the


Telemzan High to the Precambrian Hoggar
region (modified from Echikh 1998 and
Acheche et al. 2001), showing the major
sedimentary units within the Ghadames
Basin. Also shown are the principal source
formations and the petroleum potential of
these formations.

Underdown & Redfern 2008). The Alpine orogeny affected Ouenine formations, whose values of total organic carbon
the basin with less intensity than the Atlas Mountains to the (TOC), hydrocarbon potentials and maximum temperatures
north, where Hercynian normal faults were locally inverted suggest that these formations are marginally mature to
(Echikh 1998). mature with respect to petroleum production (Fig. 2).
Additionally, recent work by Akrout et al. (2011) indicates
The long and varied tectonic history of the basin has resulted that Lower Triassic units have fair to good hydrocarbon gen-
in a wide variety of structural styles, including simple anti- eration potential. Any petroleum resources formed in the
clines of Palaeozoic age, reverse-faulted structures related to above source rocks may have migrated into the Palaeozoic
compressional tectonics during the Cretaceous and Tertiary, reservoir rocks, including the sandstones of the Lower
and fault blocks of Liassic age related to rifting during the Devonian Tadrart and Ouan Kasa, and Upper Silurian Acacus
opening of the Tethyan Ocean (Bouaziz et al. 2002; Bracene & formations (Ghenima 1993; Acheche et al. 2001; Underdown
Frizon de Lamotte 2002). & Redfern 2008) and the fractured quartzites of the Upper
Ordovician Bir Ben Tartar unit. Unlike Algeria and Libya,
the potential Triassic and Jurassic reservoir rocks in southern
PetroleuM GeoloGy oF Tunisia (Dardour 2004; Underdown & Redfern 2008) have
not been exploited; however, geochemical analyses of the
SoutHern tunISIa Triassic Argilo Greseux Inferieur Formation indicate a simi-
The Ghadames Basin has produced hydrocarbons since the lar production potential to its counterparts in Algeria and
1950s, with the majority of production being from the Libyan Libya (Acheche et al. 2001).
portions of the basin until the 1990s when improved seismic The petroleum fields in southern Tunisia are mainly found
reflection acquisition and processing methods found large in structural (mainly anticlinal and some fault-bounded) traps
reserves in Algeria (Dardour 2004; Underdown & Redfern and have produced hydrocarbons since the 1950s (Gabtni et al.
2007a, b). Even though most production has been in Algeria 2006). Despite being a region of known hydrocarbon accumu-
and Libya, there has been scattered exploration and production lation, the area is still considered relatively unexplored due to
in Tunisia, especially from the northern sections of the basin older geological interpretations that focused on the Palaeozoic
(Echikh 1998). reservoirs (Acheche et al. 2001). Several authors (Montgomery
Figure 2 shows a north–south regional cross-section of the 1994; Acheche et al. 2001; Bédir et al. 2001; ETAP 2003;
major sedimentary units in southern Tunisia. Also shown is the Akrout et al. 2011) have indicated that the Ghadames Basin
organic content and petroleum potential of the regional Silurian has the potential for the discovery of new petroleum deposits
and Devonian source rocks. Mesozoic sediments unconformably especially in the relatively unexplored Triassic units.
overlie the Palaeozoic strata from which they are separated by The peak of petroleum exploration in southern Tunisia
the Hercynian unconformity (Permian–Carboniferous age). This occurred between 1960 and 1980 (Ferjani et al. 1990). More
unconformity is a regional feature of the Saharan platform, recently, widely spaced seismic reflection investigations, includ-
reflecting uplift and erosion associated with the collisional event ing 2D and 3D seismic surveys, have shown sedimentary and
between Gondwana and Laurasia (Acheche et al. 2001). structural features that may be petroliferous (Burollet et al.
The principal hydrocarbon source rocks are the shales 1991; ETAP 2003). Because of the vastness and inaccessibility
of the Lower Silurian Tannezuft and Middle–Upper Aouet of most of southern Tunisia, surface and subsurface geological
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

146 H. Gabtni et al.

Fig. 3. (a) Bouguer gravity anomaly map


of southern Tunisia. Contour interval is 2
mGal. (b) Location of the gravity stations
(+). TGT, Telemzan–Ghadames transition;
TH, Telemzan High; GB, Ghadames High;
H1–H5, gravity highs; L1–L7, gravity
lows; solid lines show the axes of the main
gravity anomalies.

mapping using in situ data collection methods can be expensive only from Tunisia, data from Libya and Algeria were used in
and, for this reason, available data are usually localized in small constructing the Bouguer gravity anomaly map.
isolated regions (Pena & Abdelsalam 2006).
Oil and gas exploration in such regions is a challenging
task. Source, reservoir and basement rocks throughout the data analySIS
Sahara Desert are neither exposed nor buried by a thin veneer
of eolian sand (Peña & Abdelsalam 2006). In these cases, Bouguer gravity anomalies
qualitative regional potential field studies can be an effec- A casual glance at the Bouguer gravity anomaly map (Fig. 3a)
tive technique in aiding petroleum exploration by providing a shows that the gravity field can be broken into two main
cost-effective approach for the identification of subsurface regions separated by a high magnitude NE–SW- (TGT1) to
structures associated with oil and gas structural traps (Peña & east–west- (TGT2) trending gravity gradient (labelled TGT on
Abdelsalam 2006). Fig. 3a). Still, the overall Bouguer gravity anomaly values
decrease toward the south. The cause of this gradual decrease
is mainly the thickening of the Phanerozoic sediments (up to
6 km) within the Ghadames Basin on top of the Late Ordovician
GravIty data
sediments (Echikh 1998), with some contribution from crustal
The Ghadames Basin in southern Tunisia has a relatively even thickening southward from approximately 40 to 42 km (Buness
distribution of gravity data with an average spacing between 3 et al. 1989; Jallouli & Mickus 2000). However, in southern
and 4 km (Fig. 3b). These gravity data were obtained from Tunisia, the Bouguer gravity anomaly map shows that the
the Entreprise Tunisienne d’Activités Pétrolières (ETAP) and the Ghadames Basin is not a simple sag basin, as indicated by
United States National Geospatial and Imaging Agency. All the structural contour maps (Echikh 1998; Klett 2000), but has a
data were merged and reduced using the 1967 International relatively complicated structural configuration as evidenced by
Gravity Formula (Morelli 1976). Free air and Bouguer gravity a series of regional gravity maxima and minima (Fig. 3a). There
corrections were made using sea-level as a datum and 2.67 g are at least five gravity minima representing possible sub-basins
cm–3 as a reduction density (Jallouli & Mickus 2000). The ele- (labelled L1–L5, Fig. 3a) (Gabtni et al. 2006) and two large
vation data used to make the free-air corrections were provided amplitude gravity maxima (H1 and H2) in the central and
by ETAP but how the data were obtained (e.g. global position- western sections of the Ghadames Basin. These maxima are
ing system, barometers, surveying) was not given. The Bouguer interpreted to be caused by sediment thinning, occurring over
gravity anomaly data were gridded at 2 km spacing and con- basement uplift (Gabtni et al. 2006); however, we cannot rule
toured to produce a Bouguer gravity anomaly map (Fig. 3a). out that these anomalies may be caused by lithological varia-
Even though the Bouguer gravity anomaly map shows anomalies tions within the Precambrian basement.
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

Basement structure of southern Tunisia 147

Fig. 4. Regional north–south two-dimensional seismic reflection profile across the TGT and Ghadames Basin (TGT, Telemzan–Ghadames transition),
which shows a basement stepped down by relatively low-displacement faulting (modified after Woller et al. 2003).

The northern part of the Ghadames Basin consists of a series The gravity minima are probably caused by either less dense
of inferred deep-seated, NE–SW-trending faults that have pro- lithologies within the basement or thickness variations within the
duced a general subsidence of the basin probably in a staircase sedimentary sequence. Thicker sediments (i.e. less basement
(en escaliers faults) fashion (Acheche et al. 2001). This region uplift) may explain the short wavelength gravity minima at L6
(TGT, Fig. 3a) on the Bouguer gravity anomaly map is charac- and L7.
terized by a high amplitude gravity gradient with the eastern A regional seismic reflection profile (Fig. 4) that trends north–
section of this gradient corresponding to several known mapped south and which includes both the Ghadames Basin and the
features, including the Bounemcha and Dahar uplifts (Echikh Telemzan High shows that the depth to basement is controlled by
1998; Klett 2000). This correspondence between the gradients a stepping down of relatively south-dipping, low-displacement
and the uplifts raises the possibility that new structural elements faults. This profile indicates clearly the thickening Palaeozoic sed-
may be found by gravity analysis. To the north of the TGT lies imentary cover within the Ghadames Basin which confirms the
the Telemzan High, characterized by a series of NE–SW- part of the source of the Bouguer gravity anomaly minimum (L3)
trending gravity maxima (H3, H4 and H5) which are caused by seen in Figure 3. The high amplitude, narrow gravity gradient
differential basement uplift formed during the Hercynian orogen especially evident along the western part of the TGT implies that
(Acheche et al. 2001). There are also two large amplitude grav- this abrupt boundary may be controlled by a few steeply dipping
ity minima (L6 and L7) in NW and NE sections of the Telemzan density boundaries. However, the gradual increase in the depth to
High that indicate the latter may not be a continuous feature. basement toward the south seen on the seismic reflection profile
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

148 H. Gabtni et al.

Fig. 5. Horizontal gravity gradient map of


southern Tunisia. Contour interval is 0.2
mGal km–1. Solid lines show two principal
directions related to the TGT zone: (1)
NE–SW (TGT1) and east–west (TGT2).
TGT, Telemzan–Ghadames transition;
TH, Telemzan High; GB, Ghadames High.

shows that the transition from the Telemzan High to Ghadames eastern part of TGT that roughly trends east to west. In fact,
Basin is progressive and not an abrupt boundary. TGT2 is not one simple anomaly but contains several small
amplitude anomalies that trend in a variety of directions,
including north–south and NE–SW. This simple analysis indi-
Horizontal gravity gradients
cates that the TGT2 region is more structurally complex than
Since the early 1970s, a variety of automatic and semi-auto- can be determined by analysing only the Bouguer gravity
matic techniques, based on the use of the horizontal and/or ver- anomaly map (Fig. 3). The more structurally complex inter-
tical gradients (derivatives) of potential field anomalies, have pretation agrees with other studies (e.g. Saadi et al. 2011).
been developed to delineate density/magnetic susceptibility Since the HGG has maximum values along the edges of
boundaries that might be related to the edges of geological fea- density contrasts, the HGG maxima reinforce the location of
tures, such as contacts and faults (Cordell 1979; Hsu et al. the TGT as a NE- to east–west-trending feature, located south
1996). To aid in locating subsurface density contrasts, we used of 31.6°N.
the horizontal gravity gradient (HGG) method (Cordell 1979; One problem with the HGG method is that it is sensitive to
Cordell & Grauch 1985) where the maximum gradient is usu- noise within the gravity data. Therefore, it is common to
ally located, in the absence of other anomalous masses, over smooth the original data. One common method is upward con-
the edge of vertical density contrasts. The gradient can be use- tinuation where the original Bouguer gravity data are continued
ful to locate gravity anomalies and trends that are not obvious to a certain height above the original datum height. This
by just analysing the Bouguer gravity anomaly map; however, method produces smoother versions of the gravity field as the
it is a low resolution technique when applied without geological height increases. Additionally, if the Bouguer gravity field is
or other geophysical constraints. The method does provide a continued to different heights, the location of the maximum
first-order estimate of the extent of density contrast and these gradient of a dipping density contrast changes in the direction
boundaries can be used for more detailed 2- and 3-dimensional of the dip (Blakely 1996). The use of the maximum gradient
modelling. and upward continuation assumes the density contrast between
Figure 5 shows the amplitude of the HGG of the Bouguer the two bodies is constant. Therefore, variable density contrasts
gravity field with the location of the Ghadames Basin, may produce a similar effect and any dip direction obtained by
Telemzan High and TGT. The HGG map includes a number of the above method must be used with caution. By superimpos-
linear maxima with the most obvious anomaly being the linear ing the HGG maxima of the Bouguer gravity anomaly and
anomalies related to the TGT. A closer examination shows that from its upward continuation at different heights (1000 m, 2500
this linear anomaly can be divided into two regions: (1) a m, 5000 m, 7500 m) a number of linear alignments with max-
NE-trending anomaly (TGT1) along the western part of TGT; ima from higher continuations offset those maxima of the origi-
and (2) a lower amplitude region (TGT2) corresponding to the nal Bouguer gravity data (Fig. 6). When all the maxima are
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

Basement structure of southern Tunisia 149

Fig. 6. Map showing the location of the maxima of horizontal gravity gradients (HGG) in southern Tunisia and the known petroleum fields. The
location of the maxima of the HGG of the Bouguer gravity anomalies (1) and the upward continuation of the Bouguer gravity anomalies (2, 1000 m;
3, 2500 m; 4, 5000 m; 5, 7500 m) is shown by different colours. F1–F5 are HGG-derived lineaments (6) within TGT1 and TGT2 (7, strike and dip of
these lineaments). H1–H5, gravity highs; L1–L7, gravity lows.

superimposed, a large number of linear features – when com- complex than a simple sag basin (Holt et al. 2010). The
pared to the HGG of the Bouguer gravity data (Fig. 5) – disap- Ghadames Basin in southern Tunisia is composed of several
pear. The remaining linear features may correspond to deeper sub-basins and uplifts, with the deepest sections of the basin
faults and show two principal directions of maxima within the being in the SW portion of the basin. However, our research
TGT zone: (1) NE–SW (TGT1 associated with anomalies F4 objective was to correlate the locations of the petroleum fields
and F5 (Fig. 6)) and (2) east–west (TGT2 associated with with the regional structural basement characteristics. Thereby,
anomalies F1, F2, and F3 (Fig. 6)). we seek to demonstrate that knowledge of the regional basement
structure as determined by gravity analysis can be a useful eval-
uation tool. Simply stated, the position of petroleum fields can
dIScuSSIon be a vital parameter in predicting the viability of future explora-
The analysis of the Bouguer gravity field indicates that the tion sites when the correlation between producing and projected
Ghadames Basin and its boundaries are more structurally sites can be identified.
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

150 H. Gabtni et al.

Fig. 7. Petroleum migration model of the


Ghadames Basin suggesting that source
rocks could have charged traps along the
TGT province, along the southern flank
of the Telemzan High (modified from
Acheche et al. 2001).

The analysis of the HGG of the Bouguer gravity field within high but a series of highs and lows, as shown by the HGG max-
southern Tunisia indicates that there are several regional edges ima on Figure 6. Even though the Telemzan High is a regional
of density contrasts that are possibly dipping in a variety of Bouguer gravity maximum (Fig. 3), the HGG maxima mark the
directions (Fig. 6). Figure 6 shows the implied dip directions of edges of density contrasts which we interpret as being caused by
these density contrasts. From a gravity analysis alone, we cannot variations in the depth to the basement. In most cases, regional
determine if these edges are caused by structural or petrological basin structural features (as shown by the accumulation of petro-
sources. Additionally, the possible dip directions may not be real leum deposits) overlie or are next to basement structures as
given that we used only gravity data and the apparent dips may determined by the HGG analysis. In most basins, petroleum
be caused by density contrasts other than those due to dipping deposits are concentrated within specific areas of the basin and
contacts. Since the sediments within the Ghadames Basin in our study the majority of producing petroleum fields are
(mainly sandstones, mudstones, shales and some carbonates; linked to the TGT zone. These findings are compatible with
Underdown & Redfern 2008) do not have density contrasts large studies for other productive basins on a world-wide scale (IGC
enough to produce the anomaly amplitudes seen within the basin 2000). Historically, regional structurally low areas that became
(Figs 3, 6), the sources of the anomalies are probably basement the sites for increased sediment deposition may contain source
related. To use this information for petroleum exploration, the beds. Regional structural highs are often the sites for reservoir
location of the petroleum fields are plotted on the HGG maxima development, especially on the flanks of regional highs where
map (Fig. 6). It is obvious that a majority of the lineaments are sand units pinch out against existing topographic and structural
roughly correlated with the known petroleum fields in southern highs, or faults are common.
Tunisia (Fig. 6). A majority of these trends are concentrated An interpretation of how petroleum migrates within the
along the transition zone (TGT1 and TGT2) between the Ghadames Basin based on the above gravity analysis is shown
Telemzan High (gravity high) and Ghadames Basin (gravity in Figure 7. This model shows that structurally low regions are
low). This region is known to contain numerous large-scale the locations of the source rock systems. The petroleum migrates
faults (Echikh 1998; Klett 2000) and the probable cause of the out of these regions and could have charged structurally higher
HGG anomalies is likely to be fault related. The HGG gravity traps within the TGT province, mainly along the southern flank
enhancement analysis, even without the dip analysis, shows that of the Telemzan High (Acheche et al. 2001).
the petroleum fields are mostly located near regions of exten- To apply our gravity analysis method to locate potential
sional block faulting (Echikh 1998) associated with the crystal- basement-related petroleum fields, a schematic diagram was cre-
line Precambrian basement, as shown by the seismic reflection ated (Fig. 8). Figures 8a, b show the theoretical gravity and
profile (Fig. 4) along the predominantly TGT structural zone. gravity gradient anomalies, respectively, due to a sedimentary
Based on the above gravity analysis of the Ghadames Basin basin and adjacent basement uplift. Of importance, is the gravity
and surrounding structural features, the Telemzan High contains gradient maximum that occurs along the transition between the
focal points for migrating petroleum, with the regional structural basin and the uplift. Figures 8c, d show the gravity and gravity
lows being the source regions. The gravity and HGG analysis gradient profiles across the basin and the uplift, and the location
showed that the Telemzan High is not one continuous structural of petroleum fields as found in southern Tunisia. One notices
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

Basement structure of southern Tunisia 151

Fig. 8. Compilation of the different gravity analysis procedures and steps used to correlate gravity anomalies, basement structural fields and known
petroleum fields. (a) Bouguer gravity anomaly analysis; (b) horizontal gravity gradient (HGG) analysis; (c) cross-section as determined by gravity
modelling across the basin with the corresponding Bouguer gravity and horizontal gravity gradient anomalies; (d) synthetic model showing the
relationship between the gravity signature, basin configuration and petroleum concentrations. G H, gravity high; G L, gravity low; G G, horizontal
gravity gradient; Max G G, maximum of the horizontal gravity gradient; Min G G, minimum of the horizontal gravity gradient.

that most of the petroleum fields occur in regions with gravity north by a roughly NE–SW- to east–west-trending high ampli-
gradient maxima (Fig. 8c). This type of analysis may not apply tude gravity gradient that corresponds to a series of structural
in all situations but it is simple to perform and can aid in locat- elements which we named the Telemzan–Ghadames transition
ing potential exploration targets, especially in relatively unex- zone (TGT). An additional gravity analysis, using horizontal
plored regions. gravity gradients (HGG) and upward continuation techniques,
showed that the TGT is marked by a high amplitude HGG
anomaly that trends NE–SW along the western sections, while
the HGG in the eastern section of the TGT has a lower ampli-
concluSIonS tude but trends in a variety of directions. This implies that the
The gravity field of the Ghadames Basin and surrounding eastern section of the TGT is more structurally complex, agree-
regions in southern Tunisia was interpreted to determine if ing with structural studies in NW Libya (Saadi et al. 2009;
there is a relationship between known petroleum fields in a Saheel et al. 2010). The HGG of the Bouguer gravity field,
relatively unexplored basin and gravity-inferred basement after being continued to four different elevations, shows that
structures. The regional Bouguer gravity anomalies indicate the maxima are basically linear in several regions within the
that the Ghadames Basin is not a simple sag basin but is com- basin. The most prominent lineaments are within the TGT and,
posed of a series of sub-basins and uplifts. However, because when the known petroleum fields are superimposed on these
gravity data alone cannot determine if the gravity minima and lineaments, most of the fields are located on or are adjacent to
maxima are caused by structural lows and uplifts or petrologi- these lineaments. This finding implies that the majority of
cal differences within the basement lithologies, seismic data petroleum fields are likely related to basement structures and
were also consulted. The Ghadames Basin is bounded on the this type of gravity analysis provides a first exploration tool in
Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 24, 2012

152 H. Gabtni et al.

under-explored basins. The regional gravity analysis using Entreprise Tunisienne d’Activités Pétrolières (ETAP). 2003. Tunisia Open
HGG will provide locations that can be explored using more Acreage. Conception and Printing SIMPACT Publishing Co., Tunis.
Ferjani, A.B., Burollet, P.F. & Mejri, F. 1990. Petroleum Geology of Tunisia,
expensive seismic reflection surveys.
Entreprise Tunisienne d’Activités Pétrolières, Tunis.
Gabtni, H., Jallouli, C., Mickus, K.L., Zouari, H. & Turki, M.M. 2005.
Geophysical constraints on location and nature of North Saharian Flexure
in southern Tunisia. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 162, 2051–2069.
reFerenceS Gabtni, H., Jallouli, C., Mickus, K.L., Zouari, H. & Turki, M.M. 2006. The
Acheche, M.H., M’Rabet, A., Ghariani, H., Ouahchi, A. & Montgomery, location and nature of the Telemzan High–Ghadames basin boundary in
S.L. 2001. Ghadames Basin, southern Tunisia: A reappraisal of Triassic southern Tunisia based on gravity and magnetic anomalies. Journal of
reservoirs and future prospectivity. American Association of Petroleum African Earth Sciences, 44, 303–313.
Geologists Bulletin, 85, 765–780. Ghenima, R. 1993. Etude des roches mères Paléozoïques du Bassin de
Akrout, D., Affouri, H., Ahmadi, R., Mercier, E. & Montacer, M. 2011. Ghadamès: modélisation de la migration des hydrocarbures et applica-
Source rock characterization and petroleum systems in north Ghadames tion a l’étude du gisement d’El Borma. PhD thesis, Université d’Orléans,
basin, southern Tunisia. Resource Geology, 61, 270–280. France.
Alem, N., Assassi, S., Benhebouche, S. & Kadi, B. 1998. Controls on Holt, P., Allen, M., van Hunen, J. & Bjornseth, H. 2010. Lithospheric cool-
hydrocarbon occurrence and productivity in the F6 reservoir, Tin Fouy– ing and thickening as a basin forming mechanism. Tectonophysics, 495,
Tabankort area, NW Illizi Basin. In: MacGregor, D.S., Moody, R.T.J. & 184–194.
Clark-Lowes, D.D. (eds) Petroleum Geology of North Africa. Geological Hsu, S., Sibuet, J. & Shyu, C. 1996. High-resolution detection of geologic
Society, London, Special Publications, 132, 175–186. boundaries from potential anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal tech-
Bédir, M., Boukadi, N., Tlig, S. et al. 2001. Subsurface Mesozoic basins in nique. Geophysics, 61, 373–386.
the central Atlas of Tunisia: Tectonics, sequence deposit distribution, and Integrated Geophysics Corporation (IGC). 2000. Gulf of Mexico study links
hydrocarbon potential. American Association of Petroleum Geologists deep basement structures to oil fields, demonstrating deep structural
Bulletin, 85, 885–907. control: Footnotes on interpretation. Integrated Geophysics Corporation
Bernecker, T. & Moore, D.H. 2003. Linking basement and basin fill: Footnote Series, Houston, Texas.
implications for hydrocarbon prospectivity in the Otway Basin Region. Jallouli, C. & Mickus, K. 2000. Regional gravity analysis of the crustal struc-
Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association Journal, ture of Tunisia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 30, 63–78.
42, 39–58. Klett, T.C. 2000. Total petroleum systems of the Illizi province, Algeria and
Blakely, R. 1996. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Libya–Tanezzuft–Illizi. United States Geological Survey Bulletin, 2202-a.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Lyatsky, H. 2000 Cratonic basement structures and their influence on the
Blundell, D. 1983. The use of seismic reflection profiles to probe crystal- development on sedimentary basins in western Canada. The Leading
line basement in Britain. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Edge, 19, 146–149.
31, 377–381. Montgomery, S. 1994. Ghadames Basin and surrounding areas: Structure
Boote, D., Clark-Lowes, D. & Traut, M. 1998. Paleozoic petroleum systems in tectonics, geochemistry and field summaries. Petroleum Frontiers,
of north Africa. In: MacGregor, D.S., Moody, R.T.J. & Clark-Lowes, Houston, Texas.
D.D. (eds) Petroleum Geology of North Africa. Geological Society, Morelli, C. 1976. Modern standards for gravity surveys. Geophysics,
London, Special Publications, 132, 7–68. 41, 1051.
Bouaziz, S., Barrier, E., Soussi, M., Turki, M.M. & Zouari, H. 2002. Tectonic Peña, S.A. & Abdelsalam, M.G. 2006. Orbital remote sensing for geologi-
evolution of the northern African margin in Tunisia from paleostress data cal mapping in southern Tunisia: Implication for oil and gas exploration.
and sedimentary record. Tectonophysics, 357, 227–253. Journal of African Earth Sciences,36, 203–219.
Bracene, R. & Frizon de Lamotte, D. 2002. The origin of intraplate deforma- Ross, G. & Eaton, D. 1999. Basement reactivation in the Alberta Basin:
tion in the Atlas system of western and central Algeria: from Jurassic Observational constraints and mechanical rationale. Bulletin of Canadian
rifting to Cenozoic–Quaternary inversion. Tectonophysics, 357, 207–226. Petroleum Geology, 47, 399–411.
Brito Neves, B., Fuck, R., Cordani, U. & Thomaz, F. 1984. Influence of Saadi, N., Aboud, E. & Watanabe, K. 2009. Integration of DEM, ETM+,
basement structures on the evolution of the major sedimentary basins of geologic and magnetic data for geological investigations of the Jifara
Brazil: A case of tectonic heritage. Journal of Geodynamics, 1, 495–510. Plain, Libya. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 47,
Buness, H. & 17 others. 1989. The EGT’85 seismic experiment in Tunisia: a 3389–3398.
reconnaissance of the deep structures. In: Freeman, R. & Muller, S. (eds) Saadi, N., Zaher, M., El-Baz, F. & Watanabe, K. 2011. Integrated remote
Sixth Workshop on the European Geotraverse Project, Data Compilations sensing data utilization for investigating structural and tectonic history
and Synoptic Interpretation. European Science Foundation, Strasbourg, of the Ghadames Basin, Libya. International Journal of Applied Earth
197–210. Observation and Geoinformation, 13, 778–791.
Burollet, P., Ferjani, A.B. & Mejri, F. 1991. New concepts for exploration in Saheel, A., Samsudin, A. & Hamzah, U. 2010. Interpretation of gravity and
Tunisia: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 75, 1407. magnetic anomalies of the Ajdabiya Trough in the Sirte Basin, Libya.
Cordell, L. 1979. Gravimetric expression of graben faulting in Santa Fe European Journal of Scientific Research, 43, 316–330.
country and the Espanola Basin, New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Underdown, R. & Redfern, J. 2007a. Constraining the burial history of
Society Guidebook, 30th Field Conference. New Mexico Geological the Ghadames Basin, North Africa; an integrated analysis using sonic
Society, Socorro, New Mexico, 59–64. velocities, vitrinite reflectance data and apatite fission-track ages. Basin
Cordell, L. & Grauch, V.J.S. 1985. Mapping basement magnetization zones Research, 19, 557–578.
from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. In: Hinze, Underdown, R. & Redfern, J. 2007b. The importance of constraining regional
W.J. (ed.) The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps. exhumation in basin modeling; a hydrocarbon maturation history of the
Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tulsa, USA, 181–197. Ghadames Basin, North Africa. Petroleum Geosciences, 13, 253–270.
Dardour, A. 2004. Stratigraphic controls on Palaeozoic petroleum systems, Underdown, R. & Redfern, J. 2008. Petroleum generation and migration in
Ghadames Basin, Libya. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 27, 141–162. the Ghadames Basin, North Africa; a two-dimensional-modeling study.
Echikh, K. 1998. Geology and hydrocarbon occurrences in the Ghadames American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 92, 53–76.
Basin, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya. In: MacGregor, D.S., Moody, R.T.J. & Van de Weerd, A.A. & Ware, P. 1994. A review of the east Algerian Sahara
Clark-Lowes, D.D. (eds) Petroleum Geology of North Africa. Geological oil and gas province (Triassic, Ghadames and Illizi basins). First Break,
Society, London, Special Publications, 132, 109–129. 12, 363–373.
Edgell, H.S. 1992. Basement tectonics of Saudi Arabia as related to oil field Woller, K.L., Scott, G.R. & Caamano, E. 2003. Integration and visualisation
structures. In: Rickard, M. (ed.) Basement Tectonics 9. Kluwer Academic of subsurface, surface and satellite data in southern Tunisia. European
Publishers, Dordrecht, 169–193. Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Publication, t008, 1–4.

Received 1 August 2011; revised typescript accepted 10 February 2012.

View publication stats

You might also like