Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Radial Average Spectrum RASresponses MESigismondi RG2019
Radial Average Spectrum RASresponses MESigismondi RG2019
Dear colleagues,
Therefore, I will try to show you the best way to use the outputs, to
visualize and better understand the depth´s conversion in a logical
sequence.
Figure 1: RAS / RAPS (above) and Depth Estimate (below) spectrum map outputs from MAGMAP.
1
RADIAL AVERAGED POWER SPECTRUM
3- Check the directory in which your Geosoft project has been created:
the existence of files PKCS#7 extension (Figure 2): for each RAPS
calculation, a new Certificates PKCS#/ associated-file will be appears.
Figure 2: Geosoft project directory and Certificates PKCS#7 files. In this particular
case, there are six PKCS#7 files.
*Remember that PKCS#7 or P7B format is stored in Base64 ASCII format and can be
thought of as a format that allows multiple certificates to be bundled together,
either DER- or PEM- encoded, and may include certificates and certificate
revocation lists (CRLs).
4- From the new RAS / RAPS folder, you can open your PKCS#7* extension
files by a new Spreadsheet in ExCel, to understand better what it
means.
2
RADIAL AVERAGED POWER SPECTRUM
Table 1: The Radially Averaged Energy (RAS / RAPS) listed in the third column represents
the spectral density (energy)averaged for all grid elements at the wavenumber in the
first column (The wavenumber is resolute by source grid). The second column indicates the
number of elements that were used to determine the average. The energy is normalized by
subtracting the log of the average density. The 3_DEPTH and 5_DEPTH columns are ensemble
magnetic depth estimates based on 3 and 5 points averages of the slope of the energy
spectrum (Spector and Grant, 1970). Therefore: depth (h) to a statistical ensemble of
sources is determined by the ratio between the slope (s) of the log energy spectrum
divided by 4. Accordingly, h = s/4
8- Crossplots the first and the third columns (Figure 3), like this:
3
RADIAL AVERAGED POWER SPECTRUM
Figure 3: Crossplot between the first and third column of the Table 1. The slopes of each
line segment provide information on the depth of the top of the sources following the
classical approach of Spector and Grant (1970). The graph shows the logarithm of energy
and its corresponding wavelength versus spatial frequency. The estimated depths are 16.1
km; 9.08 km; 5.54 / 4.12 km km that would correspond to deep, intermediate and shallow
sources, respectively.
Figure 4: Spreadsheet and crossplot “zoom” detail. The graph shows the logarithm of
energy and its corresponding wavelength versus spatial frequency. The estimated depths
are 8.7 km in yellow; 4.01 km in blue and 3.08 km in orange, by choosing 3_DEPTH solution
and 5, 6 and 4 control points for each segment. Please: you must put your attention in
column 1: It did not exist in the original output from MAGMAP.
4
RADIAL AVERAGED POWER SPECTRUM
I created that column that represents the wavelength of the anomalies, which is the
inverse of column 2.
Figure 2: Spreadsheet and crossplot “zoom” detail with another my own study-case. The
estimated depths are: a) The deeper sources at 16.1 km and 15.25 km for 3_DEPTH and
5_DEPTH estimations, respectively; b) The intermediate sources at 9.08 km and 9.09 km for
3_DEPTH and 5_DEPTH estimations, respectively; c) The shallower sources at 5.54 km and
4.12 km for 3_DEPTH solution and 5.67 km and 4.14 km for 5_DEPTH solution.
Please: you must put your attention in column 1: It did not exist in the original output
from MAGMAP. Therefore, I created that column that represents the wavelength of the
anomalies, which is the inverse of column 2: the deeper sources the largest wavelength.
Mario E. Sigismondi
2019
5
RADIAL AVERAGED POWER SPECTRUM