Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Nanocrystalline (Ti0.9W0.1)C powder with a diffraction crystallite size of about 10 nm was synthesized by
Received 20 September 2013 mechanical alloying. The formation of (Ti0.9W0.1)C carbide was detected by XRD measurements and microscopic
Accepted 17 December 2013 observation. The sintering of these powders by a spark plasma sintering (SPS) at different temperatures were also
Available online 24 December 2013
studied. The results show that the maximum hardness was obtained for more relative density materials,
meanwhile, the grain size is large. The micro-hardness and the relative density of the powder milled for 10 h
Keywords:
Ti0.9W0.1C carbide
and sintered at 1200 °C for 5 min under 100 MPa reach, respectively, 2978 HV and 98.35%.
Mechanical alloying © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Spark plasma sintering
Density
Hardness
0263-4368/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2013.12.009
C. Slama et al. / Int. Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 43 (2014) 250–258 251
2. Experimental methods
Table 1
Final refinement results of Ti0.9W0.1C.
Mechanical alloying duration (h) Phase present Space group Lattice parameter (nm) Weight (%) DCS (nm) Reliability factors χ2
1:5 h 2:5 h 4h
0:9Ti þ 0:1 W þ C → W2 C þ W þ ðTi; WÞC → W þ ðTi; WÞC → W þ ðTi; WÞC þ Fe
10 h
→ Ti0:9 W0:1 C þ Fe:
Fig. 4. SEM micrographs of Ti0.9W0.1C obtained after a) 10 h and b) 20 h. c) EDX of the powder Ti0.9W0.1C obtained after 10 h.
fine agglomerated particles smaller than 1 μm in size (Fig. 4b). The This TEM result (5–10 nm) confirms those obtained by XRD measure-
corresponding energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) of the ment (6–8 nm).
Ti0.9W0.1C powder obtained after 10 h is shown in Fig. 4c. The X-ray
microanalysis shows the existence of the major peaks corresponding 3.2. Consolidation and microstructure of bulk samples
to Ti, W and C. We also note the existence of peaks of Fe and Cr due to
the wear between the balls and the vial surfaces. The chemical analysis Table 3 summarizes the SPS process conditions and the values of the
results are presented in Table 2. The calculated mean composition of the obtained physical properties (density of compacted powders also called
carbide is Ti = 42.96 at.%, W = 4.87 at.% and C = 52.16 at.% which experimental density, relative density and diffraction crystallite size).
correspond to a mean formula of (Ti0.898W0.101)C1.09. The theoretical density of Ti0.9W0.1C by the following equation:
Figs. 5 and 6 indicate TEM micrographs of Ti0.9W0.1C powder
obtained after milling for respectively 10 and 20 h. The bright-field n ½0:9M Ti þ 0:1MW þ MC
micrograph (Fig. 5) shows that agglomerated powders exhibit different ρthe ¼
NV
particle sizes with an irregular shape of sample obtained after 10 h.
Bright-field micrograph of Ti0.9W0.1C powder obtained after 20 h of where n = number of atoms per unit cell; MTi, MW and MC = the
milling (Fig. 6) shows many agglomerated powders with an irregular atomic weight of titanium, tungsten and carbon, respectively; V = the
shape having different particles with an average size about 5 to 10 nm. cell volume of Ti0.9W0.1C; and N = Avogadro's number. The relative
density (ρrel) of the sample can be calculated by the equation:
Table 2
The elementary constituents of the (TiW)C phase determined by EDX.
ρrel ¼ ρexp =ρthe :
Elements C Ti W Fe Cr
Weight percentage (%) 15.74 51.69 22.47 8.76 1.34 The diffraction crystallite sizes (d) of the sintered materials were
Atomic percentage (%) 48.63 40.05 4.54 5.82 0.95
determined by the FullProf program using the Rietveld refinement.
254 C. Slama et al. / Int. Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 43 (2014) 250–258
Table 3
Experimental conditions adopted during the SPS process and corresponding values
of physical properties (MAd, mechanical alloying duration; T, sintering temperature; t,
holding time; P, pressure; ρ, density of the compacted sample; ρrel, corresponding relative
density; d, diffraction crystallite size obtained by Rietveld refinement).
MAd T t P ρ ρrel d
−3
(h) (°C) (min) (MPa) (g cm ) (%) (nm)
Fig. 7. Variation of a) the pressure and the displacement and b) the temperature and the
displacement, as a function of holding time during SPS of Ti0.9W0.1C nano-powders MA
Fig. 6. Bright-field micrograph of milled powders obtained after 20 h. for 10 h.
C. Slama et al. / Int. Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 43 (2014) 250–258 255
Fig. 10. SEM micrographs of Ti0.9W0.1C sintered by SPS at different temperatures from materials obtained by MA after 20 h at a) 1150 °C, b) 1200 °C, c) 1250 °C and after 10 h at d) 1200 °C.
small pores (~1.5 μm) with large density. For sintering temperatures of Fig. 11 shows the variation of diffraction crystallite size and relative
1200 °C and 1250 °C (Fig. 10b and c), the small pores disappeared density of the MA carbides as a function of sintering temperature under
progressively and large ones (~ 2–2.5 μm) with low density were 100 MPa and 5 min. The crystallite size and the relative density of the
observed. The pore size and density were reduced (~ 1 μm) for (Ti,W)C carbide obtained by SPS at 1200 °C after 10 h of MA are equal
consolidated carbide obtained from powders milled during 10 h and respectively to 38.14 nm and 98.35%. As milling time increases (20 h),
sintered at 1200 °C (Fig. 10d) as compared for those obtained for 20 h. the crystallite size of the (Ti,W)C carbide formed during SPS are lesser
as compared to 10 h and increases slightly from 20.18 nm to 25.5 nm
when the sintering temperature increases from 1150 to 1250 °C. As a
consequence, the relative density increases progressively from 93.42%
to 94.68%. Based on these results, it may be seen that for the same
sintering temperature (1200 °C) as milling time increases, the crystallite
size and subsequently the density decrease. Also, for the same alloying
duration, as the sintering temperature increases, the crystallite size and
consequently the relative density increase.
Teber et al. [10] considered that diffusion bonding at the particle
boundaries and other diffusivity paths are enhanced at higher tempera-
tures, which could affect densification and grain growth of TiC ceramics.
According to Locci et al. [29] for a composite TiC–TiB2, as milling time
increases, interfacial area between reactants increases and powder size
decreases. These phenomena induced by mechanical treatment enhance
sintering processes and, consequently material densification.
our results show that the hardness indentations are about 13–14 μm,
whereas the pores size is about 1–3 μm (Fig. 10), as reported above.
In order to further investigate the influence of sintering temperature
on crystallite size of (Ti0.9W0.1) C phase, the lattice parameter of
(Ti0.9W0.1) C phase with different temperature was experimentally
calculated from the XRD analysis. The values of lattice parameter
calculated before and after SPS are listed in Table 4.
As shown in Table 4, the lattice parameter values slightly increase
with sintering temperature in comparison to those obtained before
sintering, as a result of the residual strain release. However, as the
sintering temperature increases, the crystallite size increases, the pore
size and density decrease leading to an improvement of the relative
density.
According to S. Park et al. [30], TiC is a nonstoichiometric compound,
and fully annealed TiC shows a Ti:C mole ratio of 1:0.98. The carbon
deficiency in the compound varies with temperature and the addition
of other elements in the form of a solid solution. In general, the carbon
content decreases with increasing W content in (Ti,W)C. Generally,
the addition of W is reported to reduce the lattice parameter in the
region of (Ti,W)C formation [31]. Both the small size of the W atom in
the TiC structure and the loss of carbon cause the decrease in the lattice
parameter. The lattice parameter of annealed TiC is 0.43274 nm [32]. In
this study, the lattice parameters of the (Ti,W)C sintered are larger than
those of the (Ti,W)C powders with the same composition. In addition, as
mentioned above in (EDX) results, the composition of (Ti,W)C powder
has the following formula: (Ti0.898W0.101)C1.09. This formula shows
clearly a carbon excess which explain the increase of the lattice
parameter. Biedunkiewicz and Wrobel [33] and Bodziony et al. [34]
found that the growing grain size is accompanied by increasing lattice
constants. As shown in Table 3, the grain size, in our present work,
increases with sintering temperature. Therefore, this result is in good
agreement with Biedunkiewicz and Wrobel [33] and Bodziony et al.
[34] investigations. So, the lattice parameter increase of Ti0.9W0.1C
carbide is affected by the sintering temperature and by the excess
Fig. 12. (a) Variation of Vickers micro-hardness of sintered Ti0.9W0.1C powders versus carbon content. However, after 10 h of milling, the lattice parameter
sintering temperatures and (b) Optical micrograph (×40) of Vickers indentation of the increases from 0.43034 nm to 0.43204 nm when the sample is sintered
bulk materials sintered by SPS at 1150 °C after 20 h of milling. at 1200 °C. These calculated values (0.43034 nm and 0.43204 nm) of
lattice parameters are slightly smaller than that of TiC (0.43274 nm)
et al. [25] have produced (Ti0.8Zr0.2)C carbides prepared by MA and SPS [32]. This means that the reduction of the lattice parameter is due
at 1650 °C under 50 MPa and 5 min, characterized by high density to the smaller atomic radius (0.137 nm) of the W atom than that
(98%) and micro-hardness (HV 0.2 = 2760), which is lower than the (0.145 nm) of the Ti atom in the structure.
value obtained in this work (2978 HV). Based on these results, we Fig. 13 shows the variation of micro-hardness and relative density
can see that the increase of Vickers micro-hardness with sintering versus diffraction crystallite size of Ti0.9W0.1C carbide after SPS. The
temperature could be attributed to the hard tungsten phase. micro-hardness could be affected by both relative density and grain
However, porous materials usually have a lot of scatter. So, it is size. Pores in ceramics have no resistance to applied stress. So, materials
desirable to quantify the scatter of the measured micro-hardness values. of higher porosity have lower apparent micro-hardness than dense
The most common measure of scatter is the standard deviation. The materials or less porous materials. In addition to the effects of porosity,
Vickers micro-hardness and the standard deviation values are listed in the grain size also influences micro-hardness. In fact, smaller grain size
Table 4. The calculated standard deviation values are between 54 and increases the frequency with which dislocations encounter grain
87 HV. These values are small (about 2–3% of HV values) indicating that boundaries, thus requiring larger stress for deformation to occur [35].
the materials are quite homogeneous in microstructure. Fig. 12(b) Based on Fig. 13, one can conclude that by increasing the MA time
shows the optical micrograph of Vickers indentation carried out at from 10 h to 20 h, which leads to a decrease in the grain size, the
2.94 N on polished surface of the bulk materials sintered by SPS at micro-hardness and the relative density of the consolidated carbide
1150 °C after 20 h of milling. Based on this figure, we can see that the powders were reduced. However, as the relative density of the bulk
length of indentation is very high as compared to the pores size. In fact, material increased, the Vickers micro-hardness increased. Thus, the
micro-hardness reaches its maximum value (2978 HV) when relative
density increases to reach 98.35%. So, we assume that the micro-
Table 4 hardness is more affected by the material porosity and then by the
Calculated lattice parameters for different mechanical alloying duration (MAd) and relative density than by the grain size and the micro-hardness evolution
sintering temperature (T) under 100 MPa and 5 min, and measured Vickers micro-
doesn't follow the Hall–Petch behavior.
hardness values.
According to Song et al. [36,37], the micro-hardness of (Ti,W)C is
MAd (h) aMA (nm) TSPS (°C) aSPS (nm) HV 0.3 greater than that of TiC when the W content in (Ti,W)C is low. Indeed,
10 0.43034(2) 1200 0.43204(3) 2978 ± 54 Teber et al. [10] and Abderrazak et al. [21] have prepared TiC carbides
20 0.42947(2) 1150 0.42957(2) 2745 ± 86 by MA and SPS (5 min at 1650 °C under 100 MPa). These materials
20 0.42947(2) 1200 0.42984(1) 2846 ± 81 were characterized by 95% relative density and 2570–2700 HV micro-
20 0.42947(2) 1250 0.42904(1) 2871 ± 87
hardness values. The load used to measure TiC micro-hardness was
258 C. Slama et al. / Int. Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 43 (2014) 250–258
[3] Koc RC, Meng C, Swift GA. Sintering properties of submicron TiC powders from car-
bon coated titania precursor. J Mater Sci 2000;35:3131–41.
[4] Jin YZ, Liu Y, Wang YK, Ye JW. Study on phase evolution during reaction synthesis of
ultrafine (Ti, W, Mo, V) (CN)-Ni composite powders. Mater Chem Phys
2009;118:191–6.
[5] Kim J, Kang S. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of (Ti0.93W0.7)
C-xWC-20Ni cermets. Mater Sci Eng A 2011;528:3090–5.
[6] Jung J, Kang S. Sintered (Ti, W)C carbides. Scr Mater 2007;56:561–4.
[7] Jung J, Kang S. Effect of nano-size powders on the microstructure of Ti (C, N)–xWC–
Ni cermets. J Am Ceram Soc 2007;90:2178–83.
[8] Ahn S, Kang S. Dissolution phenomena in the Ti (C0.7 N 0.3)–WC–Ni system. Int J
Refract Met Hard Mater 2008;26:340–5.
[9] Sherif El-Eskandarany M. Structure and properties of nanocrystalline TiC full-density
bulk alloy consolidated from mechanical reacted powders. J Alloys Compd
2000;305:225–38.
[10] Teber A, Schoenstein F, Têtard F, Abdellaoui M, Jouini N. Effect of SPS process
sintering on the microstructure and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline TiC
for tools application. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 2012;30:64–70.
[11] Thorne K, Ting SJ, Chu CJ, Mackenzie JD, Getman TD, Hawthorne MF. J Mater Sci
1992;27:4406.
[12] Saidi A. Reaction synthesis of Fe–(W, Ti)C composites. J Mater Process Technol
1999;89–90:141–4.
[13] Anselmi–Tamburini U, Garay JE, Munir ZA. Fast low temperature consolidation of
bulk nanometric ceramic materials. Scr Mater 2006;54:823–8.
[14] Orrù R, Licheri R, Locci AM, Cincotti A, Cao G. Consolidation/synthesis of mate-
rials by electric current activated/assisted sintering. Mater Sci Eng R
Fig. 13. Variation of Vickers micro-hardness and relative density as a function of the 2009;63:127–287.
diffraction crystallite size after sintering. [15] Abdellaoui M, Gaffet E. A mathematical and experimental dynamical phase diagram
for ball-milled Ni10Zr7. J Alloys Compd 1994;209:351–61.
[16] Abdellaoui M, Gaffet E. The physics of mechanical alloying in a planetary ball mill:
0.2 kgf. In the present study, the micro-hardness (2978 HV) and the mathematical treatment. Acta Metall Mater 1995;433:1087–98.
relative density (98.35%) of the obtained Ti0.9W0.1C are higher than [17] Rodriguez–Caravajal. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neu-
tron powder diffraction. J Phys B 1993;192:55–69.
those of TiC prepared by Teber et al. [10] and Abderrazak et al. [21].
[18] Rietveld HM. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J
This is due to the high relative density of the material obtained after Appl Crystallogr 1969;2:65–71.
being consolidated by SPS in optimum conditions in this work. [19] Ghosh B, Pradhan SK. Microstructure characterization of nanocrystalline TiC synthe-
sized by mechanical alloying. Mater Chem Phys 2010;120:537–45.
[20] Rahaei MB, Rad RY, Kazemzadeh A, Ebadzadeh T. Mechanochemical synthesis of
4. Conclusions nano TiC powder by mechanical milling of titanium and graphite powders. Powder
Technol 2012;217:369–76.
In this work, bulk binderless Ti0.9W0.1C carbides were prepared by [21] Abderrazak H, Schoenstein F, Abdellaoui M, Jouini N. Spark plasma sintering consol-
idation of nanostructured TiC prepared by mechanical alloying. Int J Refract Met
mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering. Based on the results Hard Mater 2011;29:170–6.
described above, the following conclusions can be drawn. [22] Chaim R, Kleiner L, Kalabukhov S. Densification of nanocrystalline TiC ceramics by
spark plasma sintering. Mater Chem Phys 2011;130:815–21.
1. The fcc Ti0.9W0.1C carbide forms since 1.5 h of MA. The formation was [23] Han Y, Fan J, Liu T, Cheng H, Tian J. The effects of ball-milling treatment on the den-
completed after 10 h of MA. sification behavior of ultra-fine tungsten powder. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater
2011;29:743–50.
2. The lattice parameter and diffraction crystallite size decrease when [24] Teber A, Schoenstein F, Têtard F, Abdellaoui M, Jouini N. The effect of Ti substitution
increasing milling time up to 10 h to reach, respectively, 0.43034 nm by Zr on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the cermet Ti1 − xZrxC
sintered by SPS. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 2012;31:132–7.
and 8 nm. The decrease of lattice parameter of Ti0.9 W0.1C after milling
[25] Teber A, Schoenstein F, Abdellaoui M, Jouini N. Fabrication, microstructure and
time can be attributed to the formation of the Ti0.9W0.1C carbide. mechanical properties of novel bulk bindrless (Ti0.8Zr0.2)C carbides prepared
3. The increasing of milling time reduces the onset temperature of by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering. Ceram Int
densification. Thus, the onset temperature of densification decreases 2012;38:4929–33.
[26] Shatov AV, Firstov SA, Shatova IV. The shape of WC crystals in cemented carbides.
from 900 °C for 10 h to about 680 °C for 20 h as a result of the Mater Sci Eng A 1998;242:7–14.
smallest grain size and the most uniform microstructure. [27] Ohser-Wiedemann R, Martin U, Muller A, Schreiber G. Spark plasma sintering
4. The maximum hardness was obtained for the more dense materials, of Mo–W powders prepared by mechanical alloying. J Alloys Compd
2013;560:27–32.
meanwhile, the grain size is large. The hardness evolution doesn't [28] Ohser-Wiedemann R, Weck Ch, Martin U, Muller A, Seifert HJ. Spark plasma
follow the Hall–Petch behavior and is more affected by the material sintering of TiC particle-reinforced molybdenum composites. Int J Refract Met
porosity. Hard Mater 2012;32:1–6.
[29] Locci AM, Orrù R, Cao G, Munir ZA. Effect of ball milling on simultaneous spark plas-
5. The mono substituted Ti0.9W0.1C carbide has excellent mechanical ma synthesis and densification of TiC–TiB2 composites. Mater Sci Eng A
properties as compared to non substituted TiC carbide. Although, 2006;434:23–9.
the micro-hardness and relative density of the monosubstituted [30] Park S, Jung J, Kang S, Jeong BW, Lee CK, Ihm J. The carbon nonstoichiometry and the
lattice parameter of (Ti1 − xWx)C1 − y. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010;30:1519–26.
Ti0.9W0.1C carbide (2978 HV, 98.35%) are greater than those of TiC
[31] VitryanyukS VK, Chaplygin FI, Kostenetskaya GD. Properties of complex TiC–WC car-
carbides (2570–2700 HV, 95%) obtained by SPS sintering at almost bides in their homogeneity region. I. Preparation and phase and structural analyses
the same conditions. of TiC–WC alloys. Sov Powder Met Metall Ceram 1971;10:547–52.
[32] Powder diffraction file. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards; 1974.
[33] Biedunkiewicz A, Wrobel R. The XRD study of the nanostructured TiC/C and TiN/C
Acknowledgments composites. Rev Adv Mater Sci 2004;8:69–72.
[34] Bodziony T, Guskos N, Biedunkiewicz A, Typek J, Wrobel R, Maryniak M. Character-
ization and EPR studies of TiC and TiN ceramics at room temperature. Mater Sci
The authors would like to thank Professor M. Ben Salem and
(Poland) 2005;23:899–907.
researcher A. Kouki (Faculty of sciences Bizerte) for their valuable help. [35] Li T, Li Q, Fu JY, Yu PC, Lu L, Wu CC. Effects of AGG on fracture toughness of tungsten
carbide. Mater Sci Eng A 2007;445:587–92.
References [36] Song GM, Wang YJ, Zhou Y. Thermomechanical properties of TiC particle-reinforced
tungsten composites for high temperature applications. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater
[1] McColm IJ, Clark NJ. High performance ceramics. London: Blackie Press; 1986. 2003;21:1–12.
[2] Ellis JL, Goetzel CG. Cermets. ASM metals handbook. Ohio: ASM International; 1990 [37] Zhuzhou cemented carbide Industry Company. Manufacture of cemented carbide.
978–1007. Beijing: Chinese Metallurgical Industry Press; 1974. p. 94–7.