The line graph shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies from 2000 to 2015. Company A initially produced the most waste but was overtaken by Company C after 2012. Company B consistently produced the lowest amount of waste. Company A and B showed declining waste production trends while Company C's waste increased over time. Company A reduced its waste from 12 tonnes to 9 tonnes through effective waste reduction strategies. Company B fluctuated but ultimately decreased its waste from 8 tonnes to 3 tonnes through commendable efforts. Company C's waste grew moderately at first but then surged dramatically from 6 tonnes to 10 tonnes, raising concerns about needed corrective measures.
The line graph shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies from 2000 to 2015. Company A initially produced the most waste but was overtaken by Company C after 2012. Company B consistently produced the lowest amount of waste. Company A and B showed declining waste production trends while Company C's waste increased over time. Company A reduced its waste from 12 tonnes to 9 tonnes through effective waste reduction strategies. Company B fluctuated but ultimately decreased its waste from 8 tonnes to 3 tonnes through commendable efforts. Company C's waste grew moderately at first but then surged dramatically from 6 tonnes to 10 tonnes, raising concerns about needed corrective measures.
The line graph shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies from 2000 to 2015. Company A initially produced the most waste but was overtaken by Company C after 2012. Company B consistently produced the lowest amount of waste. Company A and B showed declining waste production trends while Company C's waste increased over time. Company A reduced its waste from 12 tonnes to 9 tonnes through effective waste reduction strategies. Company B fluctuated but ultimately decreased its waste from 8 tonnes to 3 tonnes through commendable efforts. Company C's waste grew moderately at first but then surged dramatically from 6 tonnes to 10 tonnes, raising concerns about needed corrective measures.
The given line graph illustrates amounts of waste produced by three
companies across a span of 15 years.
As an overall statement, prior to 2012, company A held the lead in waste production, but it was overtaken by company C, which then became the top contributor. Meanwhile, company B consistently had the lowest waste output. Additionally, companies A and B experienced declining trends, while company C showed an upward trend. Company A, a pioneer in waste management practices, began the millennium by producing 12 tonnes of waste. However, their commitment to sustainability led to a gradual reduction. By 2005, their waste output had decreased to 11 tonnes, and by 2015, it reached an impressive low of just 9 tonnes. This consistent downward trend showcases the effectiveness of their waste reduction strategies. For company B, has faced fluctuations in waste production. In 2000, they generated 8 tonnes of waste. Over the next five years, this increased slightly to 10 tonnes. However, commendable efforts between 2005 and 2015 resulted in a significant reduction to a mere 3 tonnes. Their ability to strike a balance between growth and environmental responsibility deserves recognition. Company C’s journey took a different trajectory. Starting with 4 tonnes of waste in 2000, they experienced moderate growth, reaching 6 tonnes by 2005. Unfortunately, from 2005 to 2015, their waste production surged dramatically, hitting 10 tonnes. This consistent upward trend raises concerns and highlights the need for urgent corrective measures.