Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEANING:
8. Writ for enforcement of a new enactm_ent:
Some times , the Parent Central Act , though has
received the assent of the President, its coming to force If sufficient time has elapsed after an Act has been
may be postponed. In such circumstances, the power passed \and if it has not been brought into operation by
the Government for quite sometime, then through a writ,
conferred by such parent Central Act to make rules, by
lhe Court can direct the Government as to when the
laws, orders,' etc., does not com~ into effect. until such Act Would ~ome into force.
parent Act comes into force.
192
193
date/different dates f
Deferred future C>t EAL OF LEGISLATION <REPEAL O
9. f
commencement o an .
Act·
. II· Jlf;P . · F LAW):
6 of the General Clauses Act
The commenc ement of an Act invariably is contro11e(j 1. sel tton . 1s97_
. of the Act itself. Sometimes an eads: if this Act, or any Central A t
by the provisions • A.ct
ediately after it receives the assent Jt r c or Regulation
commences im m of after the commencement of this A t
t of India but sometimes the sarn !Jlade c , repeals any
the Presi end e ls 1:rnent, the repeal shall not :-
fu ture date depending on the provtsions enac
t
deferre d o a of
the Act.
revive anything not in force or existing at the time at
Sometimes different dates may be stipulated for i, which .the re~eal takes effect;
D
repeal is inferred by implication. ether ·
gtia r
at Forge Co Ltd and others Vs M . .
co;poration, .Pune (1995(3} sc 3 1121
· un1c1pal
19.Recital of non-repeal:
The supreme Court held that justice would be
Even a recital in1 a later Act that it is not advanced if this doctrine is accepted. Persons in India
. repealing
the earher Act is of no use if the later Act co t . will be prqtected from ·P1:1°1shment for violation of a dead
. . - . . _ n ains a
provis1?n which 1s mconsiste~t with the earlier Act; anct JaW (due to non use , for long duration) .
the earlier Act stands repealed. A repeal by imp1· .
. . 1cation
is equally effective as of express words. In cantonment Board Vs. M.P. Road Transport Cor-
poratj.on AIR 1994 SC 2013: _
20.Doctrlne of Desuetude: ·
The Supreme Court held that the conditions
It is a process by which an Act of Parliament/ necessary for application of doctrine of desu~tude are
Legislative loses its validity by disuse for long duration (1) To ·establish that the statute in question has been in
and without any express· repeal. disuse for long and (2) The contrary practice of some
duration has evolved.
Lord Mackay says that for application of desuetude
doctrine, non-use for a very considerable period is C. REVIVAL OF LEGISLATION:
necessary.
In India/ revival of statutes is governed by Section 7
of the Ge1;1eral Clauses Act, 1897. In any Central Act or
The doctrine is of Sc;otish origin. The Acts of Scotish regulation made after the commencement of this Act, it
parliament have become obsolete and repealed by Is necessary, for the purpose of reviving either wholly or
non-usage/usage to the contrary. Partially it must be expressly stated so. (i.e . revived
W holly or Partially)
In R. Vs. London Justice:
The Court held that an offender could not be a ·Section
. 6(~) ~f the Act states that when this Act, or
punished under an expired penal law. though ny Central Act or Regulation made after th e
prosecution began while the Act was alive. colllrnencement ·of this Act repeals any enactment
202
already made or hereafter to be made, then if a difti
erent
intention does not appear, the repeal shall not re
Vive
anything not in force • or existing at the time at Which
the repeal takes effect. ,
MODEL QUESTIONS: