Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internal Assessment
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………1
Rationale………………………………………………………………………………….1
Aim………………………………………………………………………………………..1
Exploration………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Bottom Section………………………………………………………………………….. 9
Middle Section………………………………………………………………………….. 10
Top Section……………………………………………………………………………….11
Bottom Section…………………………………………………………………………...14
Middle Section……………………………………………………………………………15
Top Section………………………………………………………………………………..15
Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 17
Future Extensions……………………………………………………………………….. 18
Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………19
Introduction
Rationale
Growing up in a Portuguese household, my father has always collected wine glasses and
always invites me to learn about wineries. On top of that, he would give me countless talks about
how each specific wine should be tasted with its corresponding type of wine. As a curious
teenager, I usually find a significant interest in applying my knowledge of certain topics into
things I see in my everyday life. I wanted to learn on a deeper level about the things my father
shared with me. Which makes me think if, perhaps, exploring the surface areas of a wine glass
can help me understand the most efficient way to drink and maximize the value of a glass with
Aim
formulas. However, after doing individual investigation added with previous calculus
𝑏
2
𝑉 = ∫ π𝑓(𝑥) 𝑑𝑥
𝑎
1
This is the formula given to find the volume of a graph by using integration with pi(π) to
revolve around a specific axis or line. However, I am looking for a formula that applies this
concept but with surface area as a target. With some research, I found an equation that can be
used for my exploration with respect to a specific function of the surface of the glass, 𝑓(𝑥).
𝑏
𝑑𝑦 2
𝑆𝐴 = ∫ 2π𝑓(𝑥) 1 + ( 𝑑𝑥 ) 𝑑𝑥
𝑎
With this mathematical model, the aim of this research is to estimate the surface area of a wine
glass. Specifically, a Large Bordeaux wine glass which is fit for heavy, full-bodied red wine such
2
Exploration
𝑏
𝑑𝑦 2
𝑆𝐴 = ∫ 2π𝑓(𝑥) 1 + ( 𝑑𝑥 ) 𝑑𝑥
𝑎
When revolving a single point of a line about the x-axis, a ribbon with infinitely small
width will be created, in other words, a circle around the axis. The radius of the circle to the
*
𝑟 = 𝑓(𝑥𝑖 )
Where * refers to any specific point where the ribbon will be created with width 𝑖.
Since we are dealing with a circle and the goal is to find surface area, it is best to use the
circumference to estimate the SA. Hence, the first half of the formula involves the circumference
Now, the second half of the function that translates to the width of the circle as it moves
through the plane deals with the arc length. To derive a function to find arc length, a line has to
3
Figure 2. Glass divided into 4 frustums (Not to Scale)
To understand and find the function of the glass itself, the 4 divisions are needed in order
4
To find the slope of that specific section and any other section with the same ∆𝑥, a
specific frustum’s slant height (Figure 3.) can be algebraically represented through the use of the
2 2
𝑙 = (∆𝑥) + (∆𝑦𝑖)
The Mean Value Theorem in Calculus explains that if a function is continuous between
intervals [𝑎, 𝑏] and it is differentiable, the secant slope of the extremes is equal to the derivative
of at least one point (𝑐) between 𝑎 and 𝑏.1 In terms of 𝑙, the Mean Value Theorem can be applied
to substitute ∆𝑦𝑖.
∆𝑦𝑖
𝑓'(𝑥) = ∆𝑥
𝑓'(𝑥)∆𝑥 = ∆𝑦𝑖
2 2
𝑙 = (∆𝑥) + (𝑓'(𝑥)∆𝑥)
1
T. M. Flett. The Mathematical Gazette, Vol. 42, No. 339. (Feb., 1958), pp. 38-39.
5
2
𝑙 = 1 + 𝑓'(𝑥) ∆𝑥
𝑑𝑦 2
𝑙 = 1 + ( 𝑑𝑥 ) 𝑑𝑥
To approximate the area under the curve of the function to revolve around the axis which
gives the best mathematical approach of finding the surface area of the wine glass, it is crucial to
visualize rectangles of equal width between the curve and the x-axis.
In the case of our exploration, instead of rectangles, the frustums will be the example. As
the frustums are reduced in width, in other words, as ∆𝑥 gets smaller and smaller, the
approximation of the surface area gets closer to its true value. This creates a Riemann Sum
where the limit of the width approaches infinity, and it can be represented in the following
expression:
𝑛
𝑑𝑦 2
𝑆𝐴 = lim ∑ 2π𝑓(𝑥) 1 + ( 𝑑𝑥 ) 𝑑𝑥
𝑛 → ∞ 𝑖=1
Assuming that the width of the frustums is infinitely small, the Sum becomes a definite
integral which encloses the entire area below the curve of the function. Hence, the formula can
be rewritten as:
𝑏
𝑑𝑦 2
𝑆𝐴 = ∫ 2π𝑓(𝑥) 1 + ( 𝑑𝑥 ) 𝑑𝑥
𝑎
6
Finding the Function
After proving that the formula can find the surface area of any curve given that we have
the function for, now the function needs to be found to graphically revolve it around the x-axis
and approximate the surface area. To find the function, I will utilize Adobe Photoshop to plot
specific points that could either represent a point of inflection or a critical point in my function.
To translate the mathematical grid to the real world, the circumference of the top of the glass was
measured using a string that was wrapped around the top of the glass and then marked to find the
2
circumference which came to be at roughly (and coincidentally) 2π 𝑐𝑚 . This means that the
radius of the top cross section is 10 cm due to the circumference of a circle equation being:
𝐶𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 = 2π𝑟
With the radius being equal to 10, I could plot the wine glass superimposed on a grid
knowing that the radius is 10, meaning that the diameter is equal to 20 cm with a scale of 10:1 on
7
I chose 7 specific points to create a piecewise function with points dedicated to separate
the function into 3 different sections –one for the base, the second for the middle section, and a
top section that consolidates the part where the liquid goes. To better visualize this, the following
model will showcase how I am dividing up the sections of the function of the glass to accurately
The blue section represents the bottom part of the glass, the pink section is the middle of
the wine glass while the green part represents the top of the glass. Each and every one of these
sections has 3 specific coordinates that will help to find the functions.
among all three regions. The method that will be employed in this investigation is the Lagrange
Polynomial Interpolation. A method that can find a function with a dataset of points with no
8
equal interval between them. Interpolation also gives the function as a quadratic polynomial,
which makes it easier to employ for the investigation since it was already assumed that all three
different sections of the glass function are each a different quadratic polynomial. For a set with
Bottom Section
𝑖 X Coordinate Y Coordinate
1 0 1
2 0.17 1.23
3 0.6 0.23
The reason three separate points were selected was to create a polynomial in the form of:
2
𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏𝑥 + 𝑐 because the Lagrange Interpolation formula finds any polynomial of order 𝑛 in a
data set of (𝑛 + 1) points and assures simplicity so this investigation can be easily applied to
other objects.
9
The function for the bottom section, 𝑃1(𝑥) is defined as
PlanetCalc that gave me accurate results when finding the functions for each specific section
because it showed the procedure step-by-step, while keeping it to 8 decimal places to ensure
accuracy. The calculator ended up giving me the following function with the set of
coordinates given:
https://planetcalc.com/8692/
2
𝑃1(𝑥) = − 6. 13087095𝑥 + 2. 39518923𝑥 + 1
This same procedure will be done with the other two sections.
Middle Section
The coordinates of the middle section containing three points are the following:
𝑖 X Coordinate Y Coordinate
1 0.6 0.23
2 2 0.12
3 3.21 0.3
10
As mentioned before, all of the sections will contain three coordinates with the goal of
staying consistent and simple with the procedure. The function 𝑃2(𝑥) is defined as:
2
𝑃2(𝑥) = 0. 08710029𝑥 − 0. 30503218𝑥 + 0. 38166320
Top Section
Lastly, the top section will be used to find the third and final function for the glass
with once again the Lagrange Interpolation formula with the following coordinates:
𝑖 X Coordinate Y Coordinate
1 3.21 0.3
2 4.79 1.37
3 7.16 1
11
(𝑥−4.79) (𝑥−7.16) (𝑥−3.21) (𝑥−7.16) (𝑥−3.21) (𝑥−4.79)
𝑃3(𝑥) = (3.21−4.79) (3.21−7.16)
0. 3+ (4.79−3.21) (4.79−7.16)
1. 37+ (7.16−3.21) (7.16−4.79)
1
Which gives the following function that will complete the wine glass:
2
𝑃3(𝑥) = − 0. 21097046𝑥 + 2. 36497890𝑥 − 5. 11772151
After finding all three functions that will help me find the surface area of the wine glass, I
https://www.desmos.com/calculator
12
To express all the functions as one, I will define them as separate parts of a piecewise
The intersections were found with the specific x coordinates where the functions intersect
13
This leaves it perfectly for a revolution around the x-axis and ultimately, finding the
surface area of the wine glass with a function that goes on the interval [0, 7. 16].
As shown previously, the formula for the surface area of any function is described as:
𝑏
𝑑𝑦 2
𝑆𝐴 = ∫ 2π𝑓(𝑥) 1 + ( 𝑑𝑥 ) 𝑑𝑥
𝑎
In order to find the antiderivative of a piecewise function, the distinct sections need to be
dealt with separately with their respective boundaries defined by the x intervals they are part of,
and lastly added together to come up with a precise approximation of the surface area of the wine
glass. This can also be mathematically shown with the following expression:
𝑏 𝑏
' 2 ' 2
𝑆𝐴 = ∫ 2π𝑃1(𝑥) 1 + (𝑃 1(𝑥)) 𝑑𝑥 + ∫ 2π𝑃2(𝑥) 1 + (𝑃 2(𝑥)) 𝑑𝑥 +
𝑎 𝑎
𝑏
' 2
∫ 2π𝑃3(𝑥) 1 + (𝑃 3 (𝑥))
𝑎
Bottom Section
For the bottom section, the derivative of the expression needs to be found to then apply
14
𝑑𝑦
𝑑𝑥
= − 12. 2617419𝑥 + 2. 39518923
0.6
2 2
𝑆𝐴𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = ∫ 2π(− 6. 13087095𝑥 + 2. 39518923𝑥 + 1) 1 + (− 12. 2617419𝑥 + 2. 39518923) 𝑑𝑥
0
This computes to ⇒
2
𝑆𝐴𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 ≈ 7. 65 𝑐𝑚
Middle Section
The process was done a second time with the function 𝑃2(𝑥), where the derivative of the
𝑑𝑦
𝑑𝑥
= 0. 17420058𝑥 − 0. 30503218
Therefore, the equation for the surface area of the middle section is defined by the
following expression:
3.21
2 2
𝑆𝐴𝑚 = ∫ 2π(0. 08710029𝑥 − 0. 30503218𝑥 + 0. 38166320) 1 + (0. 17420058𝑥 − 0. 30503218) 𝑑𝑥
0.6
Which results in ⇒
2
𝑆𝐴𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑙𝑒 ≈ 2. 75 𝑐𝑚
15
Top Section
Lastly, this was repeated a second to last time to find the last part of the surface area
approximation that will be added to the two previous results. The derivative of 𝑃3(𝑥) is defined
as:
𝑑𝑦
𝑑𝑥
= − 0. 42194092𝑥 + 2. 3649789
Hence, the surface area of the top section of the wine glass is equal to ⇒
7.16
2 2
𝑆𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑝 = ∫ 2π(− 0. 21097046𝑥 + 2. 36497890𝑥 − 5. 11772151) 1 + (− 0. 42194092𝑥 + 2. 3649789) 𝑑𝑥
3.21
Calculating to ⇒
2
𝑆𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑝 ≈ 32. 4𝑐𝑚
As stated before, the surface area of the entire wine glass will be the summation of the
surface area of the three divided sections that were established previously, which means that the
≈ 7. 65 + 2. 75 + 32. 4
2
𝑆𝐴𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 ≈ 42. 8𝑐𝑚
16
Evaluation
in the real world and fulfill a goal that was set since the beginning: utilizing calculus to
determine the surface area of an object such as a wine glass. Furthermore, this investigation used
many analytical softwares such as Adobe Photoshop, Desmos, and PlanetCalc to ensure
visualization and helping understand from a conceptual view. A strong factor of the exploration
was also the consistency of the number of decimal places. I made certain to stay with 8 decimal
places across all the results of the Lagrange Interpolation to better approximate the surface area
of the glass and virtually neglect measured uncertainties. However, like many experiments, it did
have its limitations and weaknesses. One of the main limitations of this experiment was the
existence of human error. The measurement of the radius of the top cross section of the glass
could be flawed due to it being measured by a human. Furthermore, this investigation was
subject to a specific wine glass among the hundreds of different glass types that exist Yet I
believe it did what it had to do and helped to a great extent an approximation of the surface area
of the wine glass. Overall, this exploration accomplished the goal that it was set to do.
17
Future Extensions
This investigation can also be extended to find many discrepancies among different types
of wine glasses, such as volume, or even taste due to somatosensation.2 Moreover, this can also
help find the most money-efficient wine glass in terms of volume and price of glass. In terms of
other mathematical explorations, regression could have been another approach rather than
Lagrange Interpolation to find the polynomials and overall the relationship between the points of
the glass and ultimately decide which method would have been more efficient to find the
polynomials.
2
Mullen, Tom. n.d. “Why the Shape of a Glass Shapes the Taste of Your Wine.” Forbes. Accessed March 12, 2023.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tmullen/2016/08/25/why-the-shape-of-a-glass-shapes-the-taste-of-your-wine/?sh=56c0d0a96554.
18
Bibliography
https://www.desmos.com/calculator.
Mullen, Tom. n.d. “Why the Shape of a Glass Shapes the Taste of Your Wine.” Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tmullen/2016/08/25/why-the-shape-of-a-glass-shapes-the-taste-of-y
our-wine/?sh=56c0d0a96554.
https://planetcalc.com/8692/.
T. M. Flett. The Mathematical Gazette, Vol. 42, No. 339. (Feb., 1958), pp. 38-39.
19