Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
· A belief that people who follow the same religion have common
secular interests i.e. they have same political, economic and social
interests. So, here socio- political communalities arises.
First stage was rise of nationalist Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, etc. with only
first element of communalism as discussed above. Roots of this were
led in later part of 19th century with Hindu revivalist movement like
Shuddhi movement of Arya Samaj and Cow protection riots of 1892.
Later on, spread of education to peasant and small landlords gave rise
to new middle class, as agriculture was becoming stagnant. So, these
people started demanding communal representation and this way,
social base for communalism widened. Middle class oscillated between
anti-imperialism and communalism. Communalism, started rooting
deeply, as it was an expression of aspiration and interest of middle class
for less opportunity.
· Historical factors
· Political Factors
· Economic Factor
· Social Factors
· Role of Media
Historical factors –
Political Factors –
· Communalism has flourished in India because the communalist
leaders of both Hindu and Muslim communities desire to flourish
in the interest of their communities.
· The British policy of divide and rule used religion to divide India by
giving separate electorates for Muslims and later it was given to
Sikhs and Anglo Indians. Other political factors include religion-
based politics, the partiality of political leaders towards their
communities, etc.
Economic Factor –
· The demand for a separate nation of Pakistan got the favor due to
marked inequalities in socio–economic indicators including
representation in the seats of power.
Social Factors –
Psychological Factors –
Role of Media –
CONSEQUENCES OF COMMUNALISM
· Voters generally vote on communal lines. After getting elected,
the representatives try to safeguard the interests of their
community and ignore national interests. These conditions hinder
the progress of democracy in the country.
· With mass killings, the real sufferers are the poor, who lose their
house, their near and dear ones, their lives, their livelihood, etc. It
violates human rights from all directions. Sometimes children lose
their parents and will become orphans for a lifetime.
Why communalism still persists and increasing in modern
India?
Constitution of India, gives certain fundamental rights to the citizens
(i.e. individuals). But in case of minorities, the whole community has
been given fundamental rights under Article 28,29 and 30, according to
which they are free to manage their educational institutions and have
right to conserve their own culture. But these rights are being used,
above the individual rights by the personal law boards guided by their
own community laws. As it was seen in Shah Bano case.
Partition of India,1947
· Kashmir is known as the heaven of India and was known for its
Kashmiryat, i.e. the reflection of love, peace and harmony through
brotherhood and unity of Hindu, Muslims and other communities
living together. But, the brotherhood saw a serious blow due to
Extremist Islamic terrorism in the Kashmir valley, which led to
mass killing and large scale exodus of Kashmiri Pundits from the
valley to the various regions and corners of the India, giving them
the status of refugee in their own country. Since then, the valley is
under the grip of communal violence and the ongoing unrest has
become a problem for the development of the people.
After this, violence was followed by the Godhra incident in 2002, when
“kar sevak” returning from Ayodhya in a Sabarmati Express were killed
by fire in the coaches of train. This act was followed by the extended
communal violence in Gujarat. That violence is like black spot in the
history of the Gujarat and nation too, as people were killed without any
mercy. Hindu and Muslim community became antagonist to each other.
Till now people are fighting for justice in Supreme Court, with a ray
hope from the Indian Judiciary.
· The cause of this ethnic clash between Jat and Muslim community
is very much disputed and has many versions. According to few, it
was started after some suspicious post on Social media platform
Facebook. According to some, it was escalated after the eve
teasing case in Shamli. Let the reasons be unknown, but what
matters is, the nature and scale of loss to the country with respect
to human resource and peace.
In all these and hundreds of other riots, one thing is common that huge
majority of victims have nothing to do with communal hatred. In short,
preparators of violence and victims of violence are different persons.
Similar to above mentioned list, there are many more, which has impact
on the masses and killed people on large scale. Bombay bomb incident,
1993, Attack on Akshardham in 2002 by Lashkar-e-Toiba & Varanasi
Bomb attack, 2006 are few of them, having Anti-Hindu outlook.
REMEDIAL MEASURES
· The problem of communalism in India is grave and can have far-reaching
consequences. Thus, persuasive as well as punitive measures are required
to curb its spread.
· There is a need to reform in the present criminal justice system (Mall math
Committee recommended), speedy trials and adequate compensation to
the victims may act as a deterrent.
· Further, special courts should hear such cases for quick delivery of justice to
victims.
· The government should not ban minority practices to appease the majority
group. E.g. the state should not show a preference for vegetarianism.
· The Indian law defines communal violence as, “any act or series of acts,
whether spontaneous or planned, resulting in injury or harm to the person
and or property, knowingly directed against any person by virtue of his or
her membership of any religious or linguistic minority, in any State in the
Union of India, or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes within the
meaning of clauses (24) and (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution of India”
· Though India is under the grip of communal violence, but till now, other
than provisions under IPC and CrPC, there is no firm law to punish the
originators of such violence, no clear policy for relief and rehabilitation of
victims. There is no regulations for security of witness, for accountability of
public servants, etc.
WAY FORWARD