INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. MADRAS 600036 DEC.27-30
2s
Load Flow Solution incorporating Q Limits at PV
Buses
P. S. Nagendra Rao and Bijuna Kunju K
Abstract—This paper presents a new approach for handling
‘one of the important adjustments required in practical load flow
solutions, namely- the Q limit violation at the generator (PV)
bbuses.The proposed scheme is based on a new representation for
the reactive power injection-voltage (Q-V) characteristics at the
PV buses.The scheme involves two stages. In the first stage the
et of PV nodes that violate their limits and also the particular
Timit they violate are determined.Using this as the input, in the
second stage the adjusted load flow solution of the system is
‘obtained considering all these buses to be of PQ type with known
Injections. The effectiveness of the proposed scheme has been
demonstrated by considering several standard test systems.
Index Terms—Load flow, Power flow, Adjusted load flow, Q
limits.
L. Inrropuction
‘The Load Flow calculation is the most commonly used tool
for power system analysis,The Newton's Method [1] is one of
the first methods that gained widespread popularity and con.
tinues to be in use for system studies. The other popular load
flow method is the Fast Decoupled Load Flow (FDLF) method
[4], Adjustment schemes are required in load flow solutions for
simulating the behavior of equipments with automatic control
devices. The methods of incorporating such adjustments in
load flow solutions have a major impact on the speed of the
solution Some of the common adjustments required are for
the On load tap changing transformer taps, area interchange
controls, generator bus Q violations,switched capacitors ete
‘The area-interchange is treated in {2} as an additional control
variable:The implementation of standard adjustments of trans-
former tap and phase-shift control is considered in [3],The
transformer tap ratio and phase shift are treated as additional
control variables and automatic adjustments are made in the
load flow equations in [3]
‘There has been some results which attempt to incorporate
adjustments in the FDLF framework. The FDLF is modified
in (6] using proper starting criteria and independent auxiliary
solutions for different adjustments in a specific sequence.tn
[6] once the load flow is moderately converged, an auxiliary
solution is found based on sensitivity calculations to identify
new Q-limit violations and/or limit back-offs and to correct bus.
voltages for any new adjustment.After the adjustment of bus
voltages are identified the main Toad flow solution is carried
‘out with the Q-limits enforced.The auxiliary solution cannot
solve the problem of bus-type switching satisfactorily in some
extreme cases with tight limits on several controlled quant
ties.The FDLF is modified in [7] with additional full solutions.
‘Dep. of Electrical Engg, Indian Instiate OF Science, Banglore 560012,
India Ema nagendraeesise ereLinbiuna@ eeiiceretin
instead of auxiliary Solutions Here again, the bus-type switeh-
ing is adopted for the Q-V eyele-Typically a few additional
iterations are required for the adjustmentindependent of the
number of PV buses .The adjustments have been included
by applying the linear programming approach to find the
adjustment required onthe control variables in [8]-This method
though sophisticated introduces significant complexities into
the problem of handling PV buses violating their Q limits
In spite ofthese results [2]-3], [51-18] the bus type switch-
ing scheme is still the most common approach for handling
PY bus Q limit violations [4]. this scheme the Q limits are
ignored till a reasonable convergence is reached. After this
point, in each iteration the sot of violating buses are identified
and treated as PQ buses. The set of equations tobe solved keep
changing at each iteration -This require partial refactorization
‘and factor updating of the B” matrix in the FDLF . With the
full Newton's method, this implies change in size and structure
‘of the Jacobian across the iteration
The present work is based on the premise thatthe limitations
of the existing schemes could be overcome if one could a
priori identify the PV nodes that violate their Q limits and
also the particular limit that they violate-In that ease one
could easily obtain the solution using any of the powerful
(unadjusted) load flow solution techniques treating these buses
48 PQ buses with known Q injections:The proposed work
is therefore a two stage scheme.The first stage is aimed at
identifying the PV buses and the corresponding Q injection
fat these nodes. We show that the Newton's load flow solution
cean be used for this initial identification stage making use
‘of a new model for Q injection at the PY buses.The second
stage involves the use of any standard unadjusted load flow
technique, Here we use the Newton Raphson (NR) method
itself
‘This paper is organized as follows.In section 2 we introduce
‘a new model to represent the Q-V characteristics of PV
buses. The proposed load flow scheme is presented in section
Results of system studies are presented in section 4 and the
paper is concluded in section 5.
TL. GENERATOR BUS Q-V CHARACTERISTICS
‘The basic difference in the representation of a PV bus.
and a PQ bus in a Toad flow method is in the model of
the reactive power injection at those buses.For a PQ bus Q
is a constant- specified quantity. The traditional model used.
{to represent a PV bus seeks t0 mimic the behavior of the
automatic voltage regulator (AVR).The voltage at a generator
‘bus (PV) is maintained atthe specified value by the AVR. When2 Oma c
:
Bos z
in :
: i
i
t
Fig. 1. Conventional Qincction model at PV bus
the voltage tends to fall, the regulator injects reactive power
into the bus and when the voltage tends to rise, the reactive
power is absorbed by the generator However, beyond the Q-
capabilities of the generator, the AVR is ineffective and the
voltage will be determined by the system conditions and the
AVR will be at one of its limits. This relation of reactive power
injection and voltage at any generator bus is represented by
a characteristic as shown in Fig. referred as the traditional
‘model
‘The nonlinearity and the discontinuity of the curve is the
reason for the complexity inthe inclusion of PV buses into the
load flow equations.From the point of view of the load flow
‘equations this characteristics implies the use of one of the three
‘equations given below depending on where the operating point
lies on the characteristics.
Qinj =Qmac: in region DC
Vey =V spec in region AC
Qinj =Qmin in region AB
‘The central difficulty in Q adjustment arises because every
time we use a different equation, the complete system of
‘equations itself changes.
‘The expectation here is that if we can combine these three
equations above and replace it by a single equation then, we
may be able to overcome this difficulty.A good candidate for
approximating the characteristies in Fig.l by @ continuous
function is a tanh function shown in Fig.2.
A family of curves with variable slopes at the origin can
bbe defined by the tanh 2z function, The function for different
values of is shown in Fig.3,
We see from Fig3, that for a value of # = 200 the
function tanh 200: could represent a very good approximation
to the function shown in Fig.l (with appropriate scaling).
By choosing a proper value of 9, scaling and shifting the
characteristics in Fig.2, we get a good approximation for the
characteristic in Fig.1 as follows.
Fig. 2. Tanhx fection
oa etas200
os etan20
dul
a telet
3
&
Fig. 3. Tanhix function
‘The tanh(x) is symmetric about both the axes and the
limits on the y-axis are +1 and —1