Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Illustrative Examples of Reactive Capability (DCurves) and Corresponding Compensation Under Packages G and E
Illustrative Examples of Reactive Capability (DCurves) and Corresponding Compensation Under Packages G and E
MVAR capability
capability (both injecting & withdrawing VARs, or “Q”) as a
Pmax = MFO
function of real power (i.e., MW or “P”) output.
Pmin
• In general, machine designs mean more MW output means less
MVAR capability.
MW
MVAR_Capability_E is [average of Q1 and Q2] minus
output
[average of Q3 and Q4]. This basically amounts to:
injecting capability (averaged at Pmax and Pmin) plus
withdrawing capability (averaged at Pmax and Pmin). Q3 = Qmin
• VAR withdrawal is negative Q, hence the “minus”.
Q4 = Qmin @ Pmax
• Pmin is the lowest power the generator is capable of making while
online (not less than zero). @ Pmin
• Pmax is Maximum Facility Output or the functional equivalent.
MVAR capability
Package, without adjustment. 5 l e a d/lag
0. 9
a ctor
Pmax = MFO
f
Pmin
pow e r
MVAR_Capability_G is [average of Q1-Q1o and Q2-Q2o] Q2o Q1o
minus [average of Q3-Q3o and Q4-Q4o].
Q4o MW
Qo is the “standard obligation” = 0.95 lead/lag power factor Q3o output
at high side. This amounts to:
MVAR capability
Q2 Q2
Q1 Q1
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
r
powe
Pmax
0 MW MW output 0 MW
Pmin
Q3 Q3
Q4 Q4
MVAR capability
Difference:
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR 7 MVAR Q2
• Q2@Pmin (50 MW) = 50 MVAR Difference: Q1
• Q2o@Pmin (50 MW) = 16 MVAR 34 MVAR
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o powe
r
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference: 0 Q2o
MVAR 0 MW MW
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR Q4o
Q3o output
• Q4 at Pmin = -40 MVAR
Pmin
Difference:
• Q4o@Pmin = -16 MVAR -24 MVAR Q3
• Average(7,34) - Average(0,-24) = 32.5
Pmax
• Compensation = $1,000*32.5 = Q4
$32,500/yr
MVAR capability
Difference:
7 MVAR
Pmax
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR Q2
• Q2@Pmin (80 MW) = 45 MVAR Difference:
Q1
Pmin
• Q2o@Pmin (80 MW) = 26 MVAR 19 MVAR
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o power
Q2o
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR 0 MW MW output
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR Q3o
• Q4 at Pmin = -35 MVAR Difference: Q4o
• Q4o@Pmin = -26 MVAR -9 MVAR Q3
• Average(7,19) - Average(0,-9) = 17.5 Q4
• Compensation = $1,000*17.5 =
$17,500/yr
MVAR capability
Difference:
Pmax
7 MVAR
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR
Q2
• Q2@Pmin (0 MW) = 50 MVAR Difference:
Q1
Pmin
• Q2o@Pmin (0 MW) = 0 MVAR 50 MVAR
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o power
Q2o
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR MW output
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR Q4o Q3o
• Q4 at Pmin = -40 MVAR
Pmin
Difference:
• Q4o@Pmin = 0 MVAR -40 MVAR Q3
• Average(7,50) - Average(0,-40) = 48.5
• Compensation = $1,000*48.5 = Q4
$48,500/yr 0 MW
MVAR capability
• Q1@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR
Q2
• Q2@Pmin (0 MW) = 45 MVAR Difference:
• Q2o@Pmin (0 MW) = 0 MVAR 45 MVAR
Q1 l e ad/lag
5
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o 0.9wer factor
po
Pmax
Q2o
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR 0 MVAR Q4o MW output
Pmin
• Q4 at Pmin = -45 MVAR Difference:
Q3o
• Q4o@Pmin = 0 MVAR -45 MVAR Q3
• Average(0,45) - Average(0,-45) = 45
• Compensation = $1,000*45 = $45,000/yr
Q4
Pmin
• Q2@Pmin (0 MW) = 100 MVAR Difference: po
100
Q1
• Q2o@Pmin (0 MW) = 0 MVAR Q1o
MVAR
Pmax
VAR withdrawal capability:
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR Charging MW output
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR
Pmin
• Q4 at Pmin = -100 MVAR Difference:
• Q4o@Pmin = 0 MVAR -100 MVAR Q3o
Q3
• Average(0,100) - Average(0,-100) = 100
• Compensation = $1,000*100 = $100,000/yr
Q4
Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr
www.pjm.com | Public 12 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of Old-Technology Wind Plants G
• Old tech with full capability fixed at +/-33
MVAR regardless of power:
– 0 excess at Pmax, 33 MVAR excess lead and lag at
Pmin $33,000
MVAR capability
– Q2 at Pmin (50 MW) = 50 MVAR
Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability: Q1
– Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR
– Q4 at Pmin = -40 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(40,50) - Average(-33,-40) = 81.5
• Compensation = $1,000*81.5 = $81,500/yr 0 MW MW output
Typical interconnection agreements require a minimum
Pmin
reactive capability that amounts to roughly 1/3d of MFO.
In theory, the “nose” of the D-curve is typically not Q3
available.
Q4
Synchronous machine designs generally have lower VAR
withdrawal capability than injection capability.
MVAR capability
– Q1 at Pmax (100 MW) = 40 MVAR
Q2
– Q2 at Pmin (80 MW) = 45 MVAR Q1
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR
Pmin
– Q4 at Pmin = -35 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(40,45) – Average(-33,-35) = 76.5 0 MW MW output
• Compensation = $1,000*76.5 = $76,500/yr
MVAR capability
“condensing mode” can operate at 0 MW.
• VAR injection capability: Q2 Q1
– Q1 = 40 MVAR
– Q2 = 50 MVAR
• VAR withdrawal capability:
Pmax
– Q3 = -33 MVAR 0 MW MW output
– Q4 = -40 MVAR
Pmin
• Average(40,50) – Average(-33,-40) = 81.5
• Compensation = $1,000*81.5 = $81,500/yr Q3
Q4
MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
– Q4 = -45 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr MW output
Pmin
Inverter reactive capability matches power capability
(they have a circular D-curve at the inverter
terminals), however high impedance between PJM Q3
and large solar farm inverters reduces the reactive
capability. Q4
MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
Qnight1
– Q4 = -45 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr MW output
Pmin
Reactive capability at 0 MW at night might be lower
than capability at 0 MW during the day (i.e., when Qnight2
dispatched to 0 MW). Therefore, no change vs. Q3
previous example.
Q4
Pmin
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR
MVAR capability
– Q4 = -100 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(33,100) – Average (-33,-100) = 133
• Compensation = $1,000*133 = $133,000/yr Charging MW
Battery inverters would be located close to the POI,
with little impedance to PJM. The full circular inverter
capability is therefore available to PJM.
Q4
Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr
www.pjm.com | Public 20 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Solar-Battery Hybrid
(Shared Inverters) E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR
Q2
Pmin
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR
MVAR capability
– Q4 = -45 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr Charging MW Discharging
This hypothetical solar-battery hybrid uses the solar
inverters to operate the batteries. It is the same as
the standalone solar example, except also has
charging MW.
Q4
MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
– Q4 = -45 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr MW output
Pmin
New wind generator technology is fully inverter-
based, similar to solar. This result is the same as the Q3
solar example.
Q4
MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 33 MVAR
• VAR withdrawal capability:
Q2 Q1
– Q3 = -33 MVAR
– Q4 = -33 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(33,33) – Average (-33,-33) = 66
• Compensation = $1,000*66 = $66,000/yr
Pmin
MW output
Old wind generator technology is only partly inverter
based. They don’t use the generators for reactive, Q4 Q3
instead using dedicated equipment that doesn’t vary
with power output..
MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 0 MVAR
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
– Q4 = -0 MVAR
Pmax
• Average(33,0) – Average (-33,-0) = 33 Q2
• Compensation = $1,000*33 = $33,000/yr MW output
Q4
Pmin
This example’s dedicated VAR equipment was
programmed to only provide reactive capability
required by the ISA, which is a fixed power factor that Q3
drops with lower MW. This is consistent with the ISA
power factor obligation, but does not provide the full
capability of the equipment.