You are on page 1of 24

Illustrative Examples of Reactive Capability (D-

Curves) and Corresponding Compensation under


Packages G and E
Darrell Frogg
Generation Department
Reactive Power Compensation Task Force
November 29, 2022

www.pjm.com | Public PJM©2022


Summary of Package E Compensation Metric E
Flat rate: a generator’s revenue is MVAR_Capability*Rate D-Curve
• For illustration, assume Rate is $1,000/MVAR-yr Q2 = Qmax
(hypothetically). @ Pmin

Withdrawing VARs Injecting VARs


Q1 = Qmax
A generator’s D-curve shows the maximum reactive @ Pmax

MVAR capability
capability (both injecting & withdrawing VARs, or “Q”) as a

Pmax = MFO
function of real power (i.e., MW or “P”) output.

Pmin
• In general, machine designs mean more MW output means less
MVAR capability.
MW
MVAR_Capability_E is [average of Q1 and Q2] minus
output
[average of Q3 and Q4]. This basically amounts to:
injecting capability (averaged at Pmax and Pmin) plus
withdrawing capability (averaged at Pmax and Pmin). Q3 = Qmin
• VAR withdrawal is negative Q, hence the “minus”.
Q4 = Qmin @ Pmax
• Pmin is the lowest power the generator is capable of making while
online (not less than zero). @ Pmin
• Pmax is Maximum Facility Output or the functional equivalent.

www.pjm.com | Public 2 PJM©2022


Summary of Package G Compensation Metric G
Flat rate: a generator’s revenue is MVAR_Capability*Rate D-Curve
• For illustration, assume Rate is $1,000/MVAR-yr
(hypothetically).

Withdrawing VARs Injecting VARs


Q2
Package G would use precisely the same reactive rate as Q1

MVAR capability
Package, without adjustment. 5 l e a d/lag
0. 9
a ctor

Pmax = MFO
f

Pmin
pow e r
MVAR_Capability_G is [average of Q1-Q1o and Q2-Q2o] Q2o Q1o
minus [average of Q3-Q3o and Q4-Q4o].
Q4o MW
Qo is the “standard obligation” = 0.95 lead/lag power factor Q3o output
at high side. This amounts to:

injecting capability above obligation (averaged at Pmax and Q3


Pmin) --plus--
Q4
withdrawing capability above obligation (averaged at Pmax
and Pmin).
• VAR withdrawal is negative Q, hence the “minus”.

www.pjm.com | Public 3 PJM©2022


Package G-PJM-Capability Above Standard Obligation G
During Transition After Transition

MVAR capability
Q2 Q2
Q1 Q1
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
r
powe

Pmax
0 MW MW output 0 MW
Pmin

Q3 Q3
Q4 Q4

• Same as Package E during transition period. • Transition period is:


• After transition period, same as Package E, – Option I: 5 years
except compensates only capability above – Option II: after 90% of existing Schedule
standard obligation (i.e., above 0.95 2 filed rates have rolled off (e.g., only 29
lead/lag power factor). or fewer remain)

www.pjm.com | Public 4 PJM©2022


Calculating Standard Obligated Capability For Package G

www.pjm.com | Public 5 PJM©2022


Comparative Summary of Compensation Examples
(Details for Each Example on Following Slides)
Package E Package G
Steam $81,500 $32,500
CT $76,500 $17,500
CT w/ Condensing Mode $81,500 $48,500
Solar $78,000 $45,000
Solar w/ Condensing Mode $78,000 $45,000
Battery $133,000 $100,000
DC-Coupled Hybrid $78,000 $45,000
New Tech Wind $78,000 $45,000
Old Tech Wind $66,000 $33,000
Old Tech Wind Fixed PF $33,000 $0

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 6 PJM©2022
Package G (“Pay Capability in Excess of
Standard Obligation”) Examples

www.pjm.com | Public PJM©2022


Illustrative Example of a 100 MW Steam Generator G
VAR injection capability: D-Curve
• Q1@Pmax (100 MW) = 40 MVAR

MVAR capability
Difference:
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR 7 MVAR Q2
• Q2@Pmin (50 MW) = 50 MVAR Difference: Q1
• Q2o@Pmin (50 MW) = 16 MVAR 34 MVAR
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o powe
r
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference: 0 Q2o
MVAR 0 MW MW
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR Q4o
Q3o output
• Q4 at Pmin = -40 MVAR

Pmin
Difference:
• Q4o@Pmin = -16 MVAR -24 MVAR Q3
• Average(7,34) - Average(0,-24) = 32.5

Pmax
• Compensation = $1,000*32.5 = Q4
$32,500/yr

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 8 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a 100 MW Combustion Turbine G
VAR injection capability: D-Curve
• Q1@Pmax (100 MW) = 40 MVAR

MVAR capability
Difference:
7 MVAR

Pmax
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR Q2
• Q2@Pmin (80 MW) = 45 MVAR Difference:
Q1

Pmin
• Q2o@Pmin (80 MW) = 26 MVAR 19 MVAR
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o power
Q2o
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR 0 MW MW output
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR Q3o
• Q4 at Pmin = -35 MVAR Difference: Q4o
• Q4o@Pmin = -26 MVAR -9 MVAR Q3
• Average(7,19) - Average(0,-9) = 17.5 Q4
• Compensation = $1,000*17.5 =
$17,500/yr

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 9 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Combustion Turbine
w/ Condensing Mode
G
VAR injection capability: D-Curve
• Q1@Pmax (100 MW) = 40 MVAR

MVAR capability
Difference:

Pmax
7 MVAR
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR
Q2
• Q2@Pmin (0 MW) = 50 MVAR Difference:
Q1

Pmin
• Q2o@Pmin (0 MW) = 0 MVAR 50 MVAR
l e ad/lag
0.95 factor
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o power
Q2o
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR MW output
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR Q4o Q3o
• Q4 at Pmin = -40 MVAR

Pmin
Difference:
• Q4o@Pmin = 0 MVAR -40 MVAR Q3
• Average(7,50) - Average(0,-40) = 48.5
• Compensation = $1,000*48.5 = Q4
$48,500/yr 0 MW

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 10 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Solar Plant
(Same as New Tech Wind and DC-Coupled Hybrid) G
VAR injection capability: D-Curve

MVAR capability
• Q1@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR
Q2
• Q2@Pmin (0 MW) = 45 MVAR Difference:
• Q2o@Pmin (0 MW) = 0 MVAR 45 MVAR
Q1 l e ad/lag
5
VAR withdrawal capability: Q1o 0.9wer factor
po

Pmax
Q2o
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR 0 MVAR Q4o MW output

Pmin
• Q4 at Pmin = -45 MVAR Difference:
Q3o
• Q4o@Pmin = 0 MVAR -45 MVAR Q3
• Average(0,45) - Average(0,-45) = 45
• Compensation = $1,000*45 = $45,000/yr
Q4

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 11 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Battery G
VAR injection capability: D-Curve
• Q1@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR Difference: Q2 / lag
a d or
• Q1o@Pmax (100 MW) = 33 MVAR 0 MVAR
5 l act
e
f
0.9 wer

Pmin
• Q2@Pmin (0 MW) = 100 MVAR Difference: po
100
Q1
• Q2o@Pmin (0 MW) = 0 MVAR Q1o
MVAR

Pmax
VAR withdrawal capability:
• Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR Difference:
0 MVAR Charging MW output
• Q3o@Pmax = -33 MVAR

Pmin
• Q4 at Pmin = -100 MVAR Difference:
• Q4o@Pmin = 0 MVAR -100 MVAR Q3o
Q3
• Average(0,100) - Average(0,-100) = 100
• Compensation = $1,000*100 = $100,000/yr
Q4
Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr
www.pjm.com | Public 12 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of Old-Technology Wind Plants G
• Old tech with full capability fixed at +/-33
MVAR regardless of power:
– 0 excess at Pmax, 33 MVAR excess lead and lag at
Pmin  $33,000

• Old tech with controller set to only provide 0.95


lead/lag capability:
– 0 excess capability above obligation  $0

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 13 PJM©2022
Package E (“Pay Full Capability”) Examples
(Same As Prior Meeting)

www.pjm.com | Public PJM©2022


Illustrative Example of a 100 MW Steam Generator E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve
– Q1 at Pmax (100 MW) = 40 MVAR

MVAR capability
– Q2 at Pmin (50 MW) = 50 MVAR
Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability: Q1
– Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR
– Q4 at Pmin = -40 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(40,50) - Average(-33,-40) = 81.5
• Compensation = $1,000*81.5 = $81,500/yr 0 MW MW output
Typical interconnection agreements require a minimum

Pmin
reactive capability that amounts to roughly 1/3d of MFO.
In theory, the “nose” of the D-curve is typically not Q3
available.
Q4
Synchronous machine designs generally have lower VAR
withdrawal capability than injection capability.

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 15 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a 100 MW Combustion Turbine E
D-Curve
• VAR injection capability:

MVAR capability
– Q1 at Pmax (100 MW) = 40 MVAR
Q2
– Q2 at Pmin (80 MW) = 45 MVAR Q1
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 at Pmax = -33 MVAR

Pmin
– Q4 at Pmin = -35 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(40,45) – Average(-33,-35) = 76.5 0 MW MW output
• Compensation = $1,000*76.5 = $76,500/yr

A CT might have a narrower dispatchable range than Q3


a steam generator, which might reduce the reactive Q4
capability available to PJM.

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 16 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Combustion Turbine
w/ Condensing Mode
E
D-Curve
A synchronous machine generator with

MVAR capability
“condensing mode” can operate at 0 MW.
• VAR injection capability: Q2 Q1
– Q1 = 40 MVAR
– Q2 = 50 MVAR
• VAR withdrawal capability:

Pmax
– Q3 = -33 MVAR 0 MW MW output
– Q4 = -40 MVAR

Pmin
• Average(40,50) – Average(-33,-40) = 81.5
• Compensation = $1,000*81.5 = $81,500/yr Q3
Q4

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 17 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Solar Plant E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve

MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
– Q4 = -45 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr MW output

Pmin
Inverter reactive capability matches power capability
(they have a circular D-curve at the inverter
terminals), however high impedance between PJM Q3
and large solar farm inverters reduces the reactive
capability. Q4

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 18 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Solar Plant
w/ Reactive at Night Capability E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve

MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
Qnight1
– Q4 = -45 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr MW output

Pmin
Reactive capability at 0 MW at night might be lower
than capability at 0 MW during the day (i.e., when Qnight2
dispatched to 0 MW). Therefore, no change vs. Q3
previous example.
Q4

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 19 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Battery E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve
– Q1 = 33 MVAR Q2
– Q2 = 100 MVAR

Pmin
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR

MVAR capability
– Q4 = -100 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(33,100) – Average (-33,-100) = 133
• Compensation = $1,000*133 = $133,000/yr Charging MW
Battery inverters would be located close to the POI,
with little impedance to PJM. The full circular inverter
capability is therefore available to PJM.

Q4
Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr
www.pjm.com | Public 20 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of a Solar-Battery Hybrid
(Shared Inverters) E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR
Q2

Pmin
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR

MVAR capability
– Q4 = -45 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr Charging MW Discharging
This hypothetical solar-battery hybrid uses the solar
inverters to operate the batteries. It is the same as
the standalone solar example, except also has
charging MW.
Q4

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 21 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of New-Technology Wind Plant E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve

MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 45 MVAR Q2
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
– Q4 = -45 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(33,45) – Average (-33,-45) = 78
• Compensation = $1,000*78 = $78,000/yr MW output

Pmin
New wind generator technology is fully inverter-
based, similar to solar. This result is the same as the Q3
solar example.
Q4

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 22 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of Old-Technology Wind Plant
w/ Full Reactive Capability at All Times
E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve

MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 33 MVAR
• VAR withdrawal capability:
Q2 Q1
– Q3 = -33 MVAR
– Q4 = -33 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(33,33) – Average (-33,-33) = 66
• Compensation = $1,000*66 = $66,000/yr

Pmin
MW output
Old wind generator technology is only partly inverter
based. They don’t use the generators for reactive, Q4 Q3
instead using dedicated equipment that doesn’t vary
with power output..

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 23 PJM©2022
Illustrative Example of Old-Technology Wind Plant
w/ Fixed Power Factor Control Only as-per ISA
E
• VAR injection capability: D-Curve

MVAR capability
– Q1 = 33 MVAR
– Q2 = 0 MVAR
• VAR withdrawal capability:
– Q3 = -33 MVAR Q1
– Q4 = -0 MVAR

Pmax
• Average(33,0) – Average (-33,-0) = 33 Q2
• Compensation = $1,000*33 = $33,000/yr MW output
Q4

Pmin
This example’s dedicated VAR equipment was
programmed to only provide reactive capability
required by the ISA, which is a fixed power factor that Q3
drops with lower MW. This is consistent with the ISA
power factor obligation, but does not provide the full
capability of the equipment.

Hypothetical rate of $1,000/MVAR-yr


www.pjm.com | Public 24 PJM©2022

You might also like