Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Preciape Kiran Mhatre 11

    Uploaded by

    Sanket Thakur
    5 views2 pages
    Rahul Thakur, an advocate, wrote a letter to the Registrar General of the High Court of Bombay requesting an urgent hearing for a writ petition. The writ petition, filed on behalf of Dharmibai Kana Mhatre and others, challenges land acquisition proceedings initiated under the outdated Land Acquisition Act of 1894. Mr. Thakur argues that the acquisition proceedings are illegal, void, and unconstitutional since the land acquisition act was repealed and replaced in 2013, and the proceedings have lapsed under the new act. He seeks a stay on the acquisition to prevent prejudice against the petitioners' rights if possession vests with the state based on the invalid proceedings. The letter requests to place

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Preciape Kiran Mhatre 11 (2)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rahul Thakur, an advocate, wrote a letter to the Registrar General of the High Court of Bombay requesting an urgent hearing for a writ petition. The writ petition, filed on behalf of Dharmibai Kana Mhatre and others, challenges land acquisition proceedings initiated under the outdated Land Acquisition Act of 1894. Mr. Thakur argues that the acquisition proceedings are illegal, void, and unconstitutional since the land acquisition act was repealed and replaced in 2013, and the proceedings have lapsed under the new act. He seeks a stay on the acquisition to prevent prejudice against the petitioners' rights if possession vests with the state based on the invalid proceedings. The letter requests to place

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Preciape Kiran Mhatre 11

    Uploaded by

    Sanket Thakur
    Rahul Thakur, an advocate, wrote a letter to the Registrar General of the High Court of Bombay requesting an urgent hearing for a writ petition. The writ petition, filed on behalf of Dharmibai Kana Mhatre and others, challenges land acquisition proceedings initiated under the outdated Land Acquisition Act of 1894. Mr. Thakur argues that the acquisition proceedings are illegal, void, and unconstitutional since the land acquisition act was repealed and replaced in 2013, and the proceedings have lapsed under the new act. He seeks a stay on the acquisition to prevent prejudice against the petitioners' rights if possession vests with the state based on the invalid proceedings. The letter requests to place

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Rahul Thakur 801, Shree Tower, Plot No.

    16,
    B.A., L.L.M Sector – 20, Above Apna Bazaar,
    ADVOCATE Near Shilp Chowk,
    Kharghar- 410210.
    Email:-libertylaw23@gmail.com
    9869228976/ 9819417752

    Date: / /2023
    To,
    The Registrar General
    High Court, Bombay.

    REFERENCE: - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY


    CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION
    WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 1590 OF 2023
    DISTRICT – RAIGAD.

    Dharmibai Kana Mhatre & Others …. Petitioners


    Versus
    The Special Land Acquisition Officer/
    The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition)
    Metro Centre no.1 Panvel & Others. …. Respondents

    ACT – The Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

    Respected Sir,
    I am concerned for the petitioner in the abovenamed matter. Be pleased to place
    on for Physical Hearing the aforesaid Writ Petition Stamp bearing no.
    1590 of 2023 before Hon’ble Justice Nitin Jamdar and Hon’ble Justice M.
    M. Sathaye on ____________.

    URGENCY: - That I’m seeking urgent relief of ‘STAY’ on the acquisition

    proceeding which has been initiated under the Land Acquisition Act of 1894

    after ‘it’s Repeal’ more specifically by issuing a Notification u/s 4 in the year

    2014; after the commencement of the Right to Fair Compensation and


    Rahul Thakur 801, Shree Tower, Plot No.16,
    B.A., L.L.M Sector – 20, Above Apna Bazaar,
    ADVOCATE Near Shilp Chowk,
    Kharghar- 410210.
    Email:-libertylaw23@gmail.com
    9869228976/ 9819417752

    Transparency in Land Acquisition of 2013 and since the same has also been

    declared after 'Statutory Lapse' of acquisition proceeding u/s 25 of the act of

    2013; hence it is patently illegal, void-ab-initio and unconstitutional and the

    entire acquisition proceeding initiated under the old act.

    That once the possession of the land vests in the State, based on the

    aforesaid acquisition proceeding which has ‘Lapsed’, the same will be in

    prejudice to the rights of the petitioners, Hence, it is humbly prayed that the

    Writ Petition bearing stamp no. 1590 of 2023 be placed for ‘Urgent Hearing’

    on ____________ before the Honourable court [CORAM: Hon’ble Justice

    Nitin Jamdar and Hon’ble Justice M. M. Sathaye]

    Yours faithfully,

    [Rahul Thakur]

    Granted. Advocate for the Petitioner

    For Registrar General.

    You might also like