Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Research Presented to
Faculty of the College of Hospitality Tourism Management
Don Honorio Ventura State University
Bacolor, Pampanga
Bantigue, Johnbrent D.
Bengco, Arjay S.
Garcia, Elyzza T.
(December, 2022)
Abstract
Dark tourism has identified as discrete tourism phenomenon of the 21st century, with an
increasing number of visitors and tourism engaging in dark tourism attractions. In light of this,
the purpose of this study is to assess the level of travelers' intentions for visiting dark tourism
attractions and their behavior as well as the role of fear and empathy. Quantitative research will
be used in this study. In addition, the researchers will use This study used a causal approach to
simply explain how the variables related to one another. The research shows that the most of the
travelers are visiting dark tourism sites with intentions and show behaviors during their visit.
Furthermore, tourists are able to develop positive and negative emotions, and are more likely to
develop empathic emotion. Therefore, tourists’ intention has an impact on the behavior and
emotional state of travelers regardless of their reasons in visiting dark tourism destinations.
Lastly, the researchers further recommend to future researchers to seek for the travel constraints
in dark tourism destinations, since the researchers have given focus on the intentions and
behaviors of travelers.
Keywords: Dark tourism, intentions, behavior, fear, empathy
Introduction
Dark tourism which entails the consumption (by tourists) and presentation of real and
fake death and disaster sites. Dark tourism, specifically, is the act of visiting places where tragic
event, disaster, fatality, distress, and suffering have occurred (Gus & Ando, 2016). Dark tourism
has been around for a while, but only recently has it drawn more academic attention. It is also
known as morbid tourism, thana tourism, blackspot tourism and (Blom, 2012). In line with this,
dark tourism has received much attention since its definition in the 1990s. It is currently the
focus of several studies, even though it is still a small segment of the overall tourism industry.
Dark tourism is now considered a significant area of academic study, encompassing
anthropology, sociology, cultural studies, motivations, and ethics. 2009 (Bissell). In addition,
numerous tourist destinations are directly or indirectly related to death, such as museums,
battlefield or war sites, tragic places, and prison camps. Each dark tourism location represents a
historical event.
The number of travelers has steadily increased as a result of the rise in demand for travel.
(Sharpley, 2012). Every year, a large number of visitors visit places like each year, 3.2 million
visitors come to the 9/11 Memorial at Ground Zero (a year in review, 2017) and Auschwitz
Memorial, with 2.1 million tourists (tourist numbers in 2018). Additionally, one of the most
well-liked locations is Baguio City, Philippines, which boasts a variety of tourist attractions,
including dark tourism sites (Estoque, 2012). Many visitors need to be made aware that they are
all dark tourism destinations.
The role of emotion in dark tourism is worthy of investigation and paramount (Hodgson
& Wertheim, 2014). Strong emotional reactions can be elicited by dark tourism sites by
definition (Seaton, 2010), and this is typically what is intended (Miles, 2011; Podoshen, 2013).
Emotional responses to each type are likely to differ. (Chang LH 2017), said that visitors to dark
tourism sites may develop emotional resilience as well as a strong sense of geopolitical
orientation. They are more likely to be empathic. Also, a one visitor which are being motivated
by different factors, during their visit they may feel variety of emotions like from being a curious
about something that is unfamiliar and unusual to empathy and sorrow to fear and also anger
(2015; Ashworth & Isaac, 2015). In addition, norm-approved emotions such as compassion,
empathy, sorrow, national pride, or victim are expected from most people.
Previous research has shown that a person's self-belief in their capacity to engage in that
behavior strongly influences that person's behavior (Badura et., 2012). As a result of how self-
efficacy helps to explain different relationships between beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and
behavior. In comparison, self-efficacy also shapes the empathic emotion correlated with
behavioral intentions. Empathy, a positive emotion, could indicate a motivation or intention for
tourists to visit and revisit dark location sites (Decety, 2015). However, with the fear emotion, it
was mentioned (Witte, 2011) that fear is powerful, but it can also backfire if misused. Fear and
behavioral intentions related to dark tourism have a negative outcome since these sites mostly
have dark pasts with different stories involving scary and paranormal activity (Lee, 2021). This
affects the behavioral intentions of tourists wherein they could develop fear as a long-term effect
to them, and they will not come back to that location (Wu & Cheng, 2010)
Experience of an individual can be subjective (Martini & Buda, 2018), and there can be
both positive and negative outcomes (Nawijn & Fricke, 2013). (Iliev, 2020; Sharma & Nayak,
2019). Positive has been studied by a variety of researchers (Best et.al 2015) and unfavorable
feelings in dark tourism (Austin, 2015; Miles, 2016; Nawijn & Biran, 2018).
Despite the studies mentioned above, Issac and Ashworth (2015) stated Different visitors
may have different experiences when visiting dark tourist destinations (for example, a
destination that one user finds to be "dark" may not be for another); but, the authors argue that no
site is genuinely "dark." Furthermore, Stone (2015) said in one of his books that there are still
other general motives and intentions of people traveling to such destinations because they vary
so greatly and how dark tourism sites may affect the behavior of travelers. Therefore, this
research study aims to know the level of tourists with their intention to visit the dark tourism
attractions and to observe the behavior of tourists during their visit. Another general intent of this
research is to ascertain the relation of tourists' intentions in the dark tourism destinations and the
behavior that affects their revisit intention. Lastly, to observe how the fear and empathy emotions
affect tourists' intentions and behavior.
Municipality of Baguio. This study will be helpful to the municipality of Baguio to gain more
knowledge and expertise for the tourists visiting dark tourism locations in the area.
Educational Institutions. This study will be helpful to the students, specifically tourism
students, to understand the visiting intention of tourists in dark tourism sites. This study would
be enough to know the effect and impact of dark tourism locations in the emotional state of
travelers and how it may affect travelers’ behavior.
Future researchers. This study will also make future researchers know the reasons and
experiences of travelers visiting dark tourism sites. This will also serve as a reference for their
future research.
Tourists' Behavior
The most significant predictor of potential tourist behavior is the behavior of tourists. A
tourist's behavior of a single person can also be a sign of other tourists' behavior when taking into
account in the social role of tourists. Tourists establish social norms of behavior in the context of
tourism through their actions and behavior. Other travellers follow these guidelines, both those
who are already traveling or visiting places and those who have not yet done so. (Juvan et al.,
2017).
In the study (Podoshenm, 2013), in dark tourism, tourists are classified as "blackpackers"
this is a given term used for Black metal fans who participate in tourism activities, where they
visit locations where acts of violence against black metal musicians and fans have occurred in
addition to taking tours to experience festivals and live music. According to Rucinska (2016), the
traveler has a mix of characteristics that make it difficult to categorize their tourism movement.
Swarbrooke (2013; Blom, 2012) employs a tourist classification based on attraction. He
differentiates four types of attractions: natural sites, artifacts, facilities, and arrangements.
Moreover, regarding the classifications of tourists of, Burns and Holden (2010; Blom, 2012, p.
30) said that adventurers are people who enjoy trying new things and experiencing diverse
cultures. In addition, Blom (2020) notes that those who demand the frightening and unknown,
which is an adventure, are those who seek it out. .
Visitors may include victims' families and friends who are frequently strongly connected
to dark happenings. The tight physical spaces and intangible forms, such as memorial rituals and
ceremonies, might serve as triggers for memories and flashbacks of the dark occurrences while
they are there (Qian et al., 2017). Furthermore, as cited by (Martini & Buda, 2020), a person's
capacity to experience sensations, emotions, and physiological reflections without being aware
of them is known as affect. Lewis et al. (2021) also added that most visitors to dark tourism sites
are more likely concerned, intrigued, and curious about these places during their tour. Moreover,
Poria et al. (2016) added that thrill seekers who are into paranormal activity are visiting these
places because, for them, these places are discoveries and stories. Also, these types of people
find these kinds of places and activities exciting and thrilling.
On the darker side of tourists' behavior Hampson (2019) said that as attractions with dark
histories become more popular, wherein these sites are now also part of tour packages, experts
said that these might be taken advantage of, sold as trinkets, or used as backgrounds for
inappropriate photos. "It kind of invites that passive behavior, let us call it that tourist behavior
that might be out of place," Stone (2015) said.
Hampson (2019) added that tourists' disrespectful actions at sensitive locations, like
grinning Instagram users have criticized the practice of taking selfies in concentration camps. A
current or recent tragedy should not be visited in order to gawk, according to the online travel
guide Dark-Tourism.com, which also cautions against such conduct. Also, many traveling
websites criticize how ordinary tourists behave when visiting dark tourism attractions. Talking
loudly, running around, laughing, and taking selfies are seen as disrespectful and rude. How
people take photos or selfies, in particular, raises ethical concerns about tourist behavior in dark
tourism destinations (Hodalska, 2017).
The intentions set by subjective norms, attitudes, and perceived behavioral control
influence a person's behavior. Behavioral intention (BI) refers to "a person's subjective
probability that he will perform some behavior" (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975).
This is determined by the which is defined as indicates a person's attitude, which is how
much they view the behavior of interest favorably or unfavorably. It necessitates considering
how actions will influence outcomes. A particular behavior is motivated by its behavioral
intentions. The likelihood that a behavior will be carried out increases with the strength of the
intention to engage in it. Additionally, subjective norms are the assessment of whether the
majority of whether the behavior is deemed acceptable or unacceptable by the people. It has to
do with whether or not peers and close friends think the person should act in a certain way. Also,
Social norms are the accepted codes of behavior within a group of people or in a larger cultural
context. Social norms are viewed as normative or standard. The perceived ease or difficulty of
engaging in the desired behavior is what a person thinks of as the behavioral control. The ways
in which an individual interprets behavioral control vary because perceived behavioral control
varies depending on context and action (Maffei, 2012).
According to some studies (Bamberg et al., 2011; Hrubes et al., 2014), tourists' attitudes
significantly influence their behavioral intentions (Wang & Hsu, 2010). According to Best
(2010), the emotions that tourists experience while visiting sites associated with disaster and
death can shape behavioral intentions through revisiting intentions and willingness to
recommend. It is essential to generate positive word-of-mouth and revisit intentions for sites
dealing with death and torment (Muzaini, Teo, and Yeoh, 2014). According to research on
concentration camps, visitors' emotional responses are a reliable indicator of their intent to return
and their likelihood to spread good word of mouth (Nawijn & Fricke, 2013).
Supporting the mentioned studies in this research, it was discovered that the most
perceptive pictures, "image of memorial place" and "image of the educational location," were
positively correlated with the majority of on-site experience and behavioral intention
subdimensions. Tourists' perceptions of the "image of leisure place" and "image of fear
landscapes" were negatively correlated with various aspects of on-site experience and behavioral
intention (Lili et al. and Lopez et al., 2021).
With the behavioral intention being mentioned by the researchers and how these both are
entwined and linked along with the emotional state of tourists, researchers will use the theory of
planned behavior since the study is about the intentions and behavior of travelers. Swan (1981)
proposed this behavioral intention is being defined as an anticipated of individual. Behavioral
intention by the definition is a person's anticipated or planned future behavior—is a key factor
that significantly predicts observed behavior (Baloglu, 2011). Many people held the view that
intentions always came before actions (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Konu & Laukkanen, 2010).
Three constructs of the behavioral intentions are the subjective norm, perceived
behavioral control and the attitude which are the foundation of Fishbein and Ajzen's Theory of
Planned Behavior (TPB). This has been used extensively in tourism research (Ajzen & Driver,
1992; Han et al., 2010; Han & Kim, 2010; Lam Hsu, 2012). According to TPB, people are more
likely to engage in behaviors that they think are attainable (Armitage & Conner, 2011). Ajzen
(1991) mentioned that subjective norm, attitude, and perceived behavioral control are the factors
in predicting the intention of individual. Tourists' perceptions and their intentions of their
capacity to engage in a particular behavior are being influenced by the perceived behavioral
control.With that, the previous research mentioned by the researchers,A hypothesis were made in
regards with the relationship between tourists' intentions and behavior:
H1: Tourists' intentions have a significant relationship with the tourists' behavior.
Data Collection
The information gathered via the face-to-face survey questionnaire was arranged, tallied,
and finalized. The researchers conducted the study for less than a week to get the respondents
needed for the study. The researchers gave the questionnaires to the respondents directly to the
chosen respondents. Furthermore, researchers used causal analysis to analyze the data, which
enabled them to quickly describe the study's variables to determine the relationship between
tourists' level of intentions and behavior in locations under the dark tourism and the fear and
empathy as a mediator which is developed during the visit. Descriptive causal design is used in
investigations that seek to present static images of circumstances and establish the relationship
between various variables (McBurney & White, 2013).
Data Analysis
In testing the hypotheses of the study, the partial-least-square structural medeling (PLS-
SEM) was used. The Warp-PLS version 8.0 which is statistical software was used to test the
relationship between the observed and latent variables (Khine, 2013). This also permitted the
researchers to identify the model fit and test the causal models with a linear equation.
Ethical Consideration
The questionnaire comes with an informed consent form that explains the objective of the
survey, the value of respondents’ involvement, and the amount of time it takes to complete the
entire questionnaire. Participants remained completely anonymous and will never reveal the
identity of the subject of the inquiry. Research academics know who the participants are their
information remains confidential from everyone else.