Department of Food Science & Technology

Faculty of Applied Sciences

University of Sri Jayewardenepura

B.Sc. (Special) Degree Programme in Food Science & Technology

Year III - Semester II

FST 368 2.0 Emerging Food Technologies and Bio Technology

Lecturer
Senior Prof. K.K.D.S. Ranaweera

CULTURED MEAT AS A SUSTAINABLE APPROACH

S.H.T.N Sewwandi

AS2020722

1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
executive summary: .......................................................................................................................................3
1. What is cultured meat? ...........................................................................................................................3
2. How cultured meat is made? ...................................................................................................................3
2.1. Cell Collection .................................................................................................................................3
2.2. Cell culture ......................................................................................................................................3
2.3. Scaffolding or 3D Structure (Optional) ...........................................................................................3
2.4. Bioreactor Cultivation .....................................................................................................................4
2.5. Harvesting .......................................................................................................................................4
2.6. Preparation and Augmentation of Flavor ........................................................................................4
3. How cultured meat effects to environment and sustainability................................................................4
3.1. Cultured meat vs GHGs emissions & global warming ...................................................................4
3.2. Cultured meat vs land usage ............................................................................................................5
3.3. Cultured meat vs energy usage ........................................................................................................6
3.4. Cultured meat vs water usage and water pollution ..........................................................................6
3.5. Cultured meat vs human health .......................................................................................................7
4. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of cultured meat .......................................................................................8
4.1. LCA Methodology ..........................................................................................................................8
4.1.1. Goal and Scope Definition .......................................................................................................8
4.1.2. Inventory analysis ....................................................................................................................8
4.1.3. Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) ...................................................................................9
4.1.4. Interpretation ............................................................................................................................9
4.2. Importance of LCA in Assessing Cultured Meat's Environmental Impact. ....................................9
4.3. Conclusions made by LCA on cultured meat ..................................................................................9
5. Challenges in cultured meat production ...............................................................................................10
6. Some environmental issues caused by cultured meat ...........................................................................10
7. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................11
8. bibliography ..........................................................................................................................................12
9. Reference questions .................................................................................................................................12

2
 of $2.8 billion. Additionally, the Food and
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Cultured meat, an
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
innovative sustainable protein source, involves
recently concluded an evaluation of food safety,
cultivating animal cells in controlled
concluding that farmed proteins are virtually
environments. By bypassing traditional livestock
identical to conventional meat, but with the
farming, this method significantly reduces land
potential to significantly reduce pollution and
and water use, lowers greenhouse gas emissions,
animal suffering.
and addresses ethical concerns. The procedure
comprises the extraction of cells, which are then 2. HOW CULTURED MEAT IS MADE?
cultivated in nutrient-rich bioreactors to produce
edible meat. Cultured meat, marketed as a
solution to the environmental damage caused by 2.1.CELL COLLECTION
traditional meat production, has the ability to
completely change the way that the world's food
The first step in the procedure is to select and
systems operate in the future. Despite obstacles
collect a small sample of animal cells, usually
such as increasing production volume and
from muscle tissue. These cells are the foundation
minimizing expenses, it presents a viable
for in vitro meat cultivation. Myoblasts, which are
substitute, providing a more ethical and
precursor cells with an ability to develop into
environmentally responsible means of fulfilling
muscle cells, tend to be the cells of choice.
the world's increasing protein needs.
2.2.CELL CULTURE

1. WHAT IS CULTURED MEAT?

Cultured meat, also referred to as lab-grown, cell-
based, or clean meat, signifies a paradigm shift in
the domain of meat production that deviates
substantially from traditional animal agriculture.
Unlike traditional methods, which include the
slaughtering of animals for their meat, cultured
meat is produced by methodically growing animal
cells in a regulated environment, typically in a
bioreactor, to produce edible tissue. This
revolutionary method, supported by scientific
inventiveness, has the potential to revolutionize
the global food business by providing a feasible,
ethical, and possibly more effective substitute for
the conventional methods of raising animals.
The USDA has officially approved Upside Foods
and Good Meat to sell cultured meat in the United
States after the Food and Drug Administration
granted them the authorization to do so a year
prior. Since 2016, the industry has invested a total
3
After that, the separated cells are put in a culture
medium that is rich in nutrients. Amino acids,
vitamins, minerals, and growth factors are among
the vital elements included in this medium that are
required for cell division and growth. Muscle
tissue is formed by the proliferation and
differentiation of cells into distinct cell types.
2.3.SCAFFOLDING OR 3D ST RUCTURE
(OPTIONAL)
In certain methods, scientists reconstruct the
natural environment where muscle tissue forms
by supporting cell growth with a scaffold or 3D
structure. The scaffold, which helps cells arrange
themselves in three dimensions, can be
constructed from edible or biodegradable
materials.
 2.4.BIOREACTOR CULTIVATION
After that, the cell culture is moved into a
bioreactor, a carefully regulated environment that
mimics the conditions in the environment
required for tissue formation and cell
proliferation. To maximize cell growth and
differentiation, the bioreactor regulates
temperature, supplies nutrients, and provides
aeration. The bioreactor allows the cultivated
cells to mature and develop further. The goal of
this procedure is to create a well-formed tissue
that has attributes like muscle fibers and fat cells
found in regular meat. In order to improve the
finished product's flavor, texture, and nutritional
profile, researchers strive to optimize the culture
conditions.
2.5.HARVESTING
Harvesting occurs from the bioreactor once the
produced meat reaches the correct stage of
maturity. Burgers, nuggets, and steaks are just a
few of the forms that can be made from the
collected product.
2.6.PREPARATION AND AUGMENTATION
OF FLAVOR
Further processes may be done to improve flavor,
texture, and nutritional content, depending on the
desired qualities of the finished product. A few
examples of this would include adding particular
lipids, proteins, or other components.
4
Figure 1: production process of cultured meat
3. HOW CULTURED MEAT EFFECTS
TO ENVIRONMENT AND
SUSTAINABILITY
The population of the globe has increased
significantly over the years, with estimates
estimating it at 7.6 billion in 2017 and 9.8 billion
by 2050. This development has been propelled by
urbanization, rising affluence, and population
growth. Concerns regarding the environmental
effects of conventional livestock production have
caused a search for sustainable alternatives in
response to the growing global demand for animal
products, an essential part of diets.
It is well-known that raising livestock results in
the depletion of natural resources, increased
greenhouse gas emissions, decreased nutritional
value, and ethical issues because of the suffering
of the animals. As a result, there is an increasing
interest in alternatives like cultured meat, which
is produced by growing meat cells in a controlled
environment. This method presents a viable way
to solve the ethical, health, and environmental
issues related to traditional meat production.
3.1.CULTURED MEAT VS GHG S
EMISSIONS & GLOBAL W ARMING
The global demand for livestock products like
meat, milk, and eggs is increasing due to rising
incomes and growing populations. Food
production needs to increase to fulfill this
demand, but there are concerns about the negative
impacts that meat production and consumption
have on the environment and human health. The
production of livestock accounts for over 80% of
the greenhouse gas emissions from food supply
chains worldwide. To address these issues and
lessen the negative effects that animal farming has
on the environment and human health, significant
dietary adjustments may be necessary. Carbon
dioxide (CO2) accounts for about 27% of all
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to the
livestock industry. Changes in the utilization of
land and the industry's use of fossil fuels are the
main causes of this. Similar amounts, about 29%,
come from applying fertilizers and manure to
fields used for feed crops. Remarkably, enteric
fermentation, manure, and rice feed are the main
sources of methane (CH4), which accounts for
around 44% of emissions from the livestock
industry. It is known that methane is a more potent
greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, which is
typically released into the atmosphere.
The cultivation of meat through in vitro processes
offers a sustainable alternative that could
potentially curb the GHGs emissions. Traditional
meat production techniques, particularly animal
farming, are responsible for a significant amount
of greenhouse gas emissions, mostly nitrogen
oxide and methane. Methane is 28 times more
potent than carbon dioxide and is a major cause of
global warming. Similarly, the global warming
potential of nitrogen oxide emissions from
fertilizer use and manure storage is 265 times
greater than that of carbon dioxide.
Nevertheless, the production of cultured meat
offers a significant reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions. The particulars of modern production
processes determine the carbon footprint
connected to in vitro meat production. Methane
5
(CH4) and nitrogen oxide (N2O) emissions from
the production of cultured meat, however, are
extremely minor and have a less substantial
impact on the dynamics of global warming.
Although the constant release of carbon dioxide
(CO2) affects the heating effect over an extended
period of time, cultured meat is a more
ecologically friendly choice due to the overall
decrease in emissions of methane and nitrogen
oxide. The particulars of modern production
processes determine the carbon footprint
connected to in vitro meat production. United
Nations Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs)
of the 2030 Agenda mention Climate Action as
one of the important strategies to be considered.
Production of cultured meat could significantly
reduce gas emissions and therefore contribute to
the decrease of green-house effects.
3.2.CULTURED MEAT VS LAND USAGE
Conventional livestock farming requires vast
expanses of land for grazing, feed production, and
infrastructure. Forests are cut down to create room
for pastures and feed crops, which fragments
habitats and reduces biodiversity. Furthermore,
the environmental impact of livestock farming
goes beyond the land that is directly utilized for
animal husbandry; it also includes the land that is
needed for the production of feed, the storage of
water, and the removal of waste. Cultured meat
can be produced in controlled conditions, such as
bioreactors, in contrast to typical animal
production. The controlled conditions of
bioreactors allow for a higher density of meat
production within a smaller physical footprint
compared to extensive traditional farming. This
efficiency is particularly crucial in addressing the
global challenge of feeding a growing population
while minimizing the impact on natural
ecosystems. Because of this regulated
environment, land resources can be used more
effectively, which minimizes the need for
extensive deforestation. That will preserve natural
habitats, protect biodiversity, and mitigate the
adverse effects of deforestation on climate
patterns. In fact, 70% of all arable land on the
planet is currently dedicated to animal husbandry,
including grazing land and feed production. This
statistic highlights the substantial reduction in
land usage that could be achieved through the
adoption of cultured meat. This aligns with the
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda, particularly the "Life
on Land" objective
Studies suggest that t 99% less land is required to
produce cultured meat rather than livestock meat.
This significant reduction in land usage represents
a transformative shift in agricultural practices,
addressing one of the most pressing
environmental challenges associated with
conventional meat production.
3.3.CULTURED MEAT VS ENERGY USAGE
Direct energy inputs for cultured meat involve
processing raw biomass material into the cell
medium, culturing the cells, and transforming
them into a consumable product. Sterilization and
hydrolysis are steps in this procedure. On the
other hand, housing-related functions including
lighting, heating, and cooling are the main uses of
direct energy for typical livestock. According to
the study, cultured meat has direct energy inputs
that are significantly higher than those of the other
foods, ranging from 18 to 25 GJ per ton. These
energy requirements actually exceed the
maximum direct energy demand for poultry meat,
which is 4.5 GJ per ton, by at least four times,
compared to any other conventional animal
product.
The study shows that a low-cost, low-carbon
energy source would be necessary for cultured
meat to be both commercially and
environmentally sustainable. One important
6
consideration in the manufacturing of cultured
meat is the direct energy requirements, which
include processing raw biomass and cell
culturing. The study also notes that, although the
precise quantity is yet unknown, the supply of
growth nutrients, hormones, and trace
components like B12 affects the resources needed
to produce cultured meat.
Despite these factors, it is shown that the total
primary energy consumed in the production of
cultured meat is 46% less than that of beef
production, even when accounting for energy-
intensive procedures as the usage of machinery
and fertilizer. It is important to remember, though,
that the creation of cultured meat still requires
38% more primary energy than that of poultry
meat. Because cultured meat is supposed to have
a longer shelf life than regular meat, there may be
additional benefits. For example, cultured meat
may lower the cost of transportation,
refrigeration, and waste materials. Also take note
of the fact that managing carcass waste is not a
problem while producing meat through culture.
Considering how novel the technology of cultured
meat is compared to other meat processing
methods, the study indicates that more research
and optimization could lead to lower energy and
costs. In comparison to conventional meat
sources, cultured meat may become more
competitive and sustainable as a result of this
continuous improvement in production
efficiency.
3.4.CULTURED MEAT VS WAT ER USAGE
AND WATER POLLUTION
In general, producing cultured meat uses
considerably less water than raising livestock
using conventional methods. Water is mostly used
for cell culture and maintenance in bioreactors,
which are controlled settings employed in this
procedure. Because cultured meat doesn't require need the use of antibiotics for livestock
extensive irrigation of feed crops or the water maintenance, the studies suggest that the
needed for livestock to drink, animal husbandry, production of cultured meat helps reduce
feed production, and sewage management, it has antibiotic pollution.
a smaller water footprint. According to studies
that have been conducted before, Beef has the There is evidence that over 30% of toxic heavy
highest water footprint at 15,400 cubic meters per metals, which can contaminate freshwater
ton, followed by sheep (10,400), pig (6,000), goat supplies, are present in the water used in
(5,500), and chicken (4,300). This ranking reflects conventional agriculture, especially in stables.
the varying levels of water efficiency in the Since the regulated environment of cultured meat
production processes of different meats, with production enables more efficient waste
chicken having the lowest water footprint. The management, it is suggested that this transition in
information highlights the importance of meat production will help lower the amounts of
considering water usage when assessing the these hazardous heavy metals in water.
environmental impact of meat consumption.
Some estimates suggest that cultured meat
production can reduce water usage by up to 90%
or more compared to conventional livestock
farming. Regarding water consumption, it is
claimed in the media that 15,000 L of fresh water
are necessary to produce 1 kg of beef. In reality,
95% of this amount of water is used for the growth
of crops, plants and forages to feed animals. Much
of this water is not saved if farm animals are
removed from pastures and land. Depending on a
number of variables, including the particular
techniques used, the needs for feed crops, and
Figure 2: comparison of resources used in convectional meat
regional variances, the amount of water used by production vs cultured meat
producing cultured meat as opposed to traditional
meat production may change.

3.5.CULTURED MEAT VS HUM AN HEALTH

Water pollution caused by nitrogen and
phosphorus is a consequence of conventional
agriculture, particularly in the livestock farming
industry. The water used in stables is responsible
for about 33 percent of the global contamination
with these components. The pollution that comes
from phosphorus and nitrogen in water sources is
mitigated by the production of meat through
culture rather than large-scale animal husbandry.
Antibiotic contamination has been found to be
significantly caused by the water used in stables.
Because the creation of cultured meat does not
7
Cultured meat is highlighted for its potential
health benefits, primarily due to the controlled
composition and quality it offers. Adjustments in
fat content, flavor, and the proportion of
unsaturated to saturated fatty acids are possible
due to the regulated production method. The
absence of hormones and pathogens such as
Salmonella, which are frequently present in
conventional meat, is achieved by using solely
muscle tissue in cultured meat. Cultured meat is
expected to be free of antibiotics and dioxins, in
contrast to meat produced normally. In addition, a
significant decline in illnesses caused by food is
noted, as is the possible drop in the prevalence of
obesity and cardiovascular disorders.
Furthermore, cultured meat may help reduce the
risk of animal-transmitted diseases, which are a
major cause of disease in humans. Studies
reported that 60% of human diseases and 75% of
emerging human diseases come from animal
transmission. Thus, in humans, swine and avian
influenza are transmitted from animals. Botulism
becomes also a preventable disease by using
controlled cellular agriculture.
In contrast to conventional agriculture, where
antibiotics are frequently used in sub-therapeutic
levels to encourage animal tissue growth,
producers of cultured meat claim that they do not
utilize antibiotics in their production process. A
key concern for world health is the emergence of
pathogen-resistant strains, which has been
facilitated by the widespread use of antibiotics in
traditional farming. Global health is seriously
threatened by antibiotic resistance, according to
the World Health Organization. The theory of
"One Health" has been presented to highlight the
relationship between animal, environmental, and
human health. In this context, it is suggested that
producing and consuming cultured meat is a
feasible way to reduce the spread of antibiotic
resistance across this integrated life cycle. It has
been proposed that this strategy, which abandons
the use of antibiotics in the production of cultured
meat, may help solve the global issue of antibiotic
resistance and advance more environmentally
friendly and health-conscious food production.
8
4. LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
OF CULTURED MEAT
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a systematic and
comprehensive methodology used to evaluate the
environmental impacts associated with a product
or system throughout its entire life cycle, from
raw material extraction to production, use, and
disposal. In the context of cultured meat life cycle
assessment (LCA) emerges as a potent instrument
for objectively evaluating and measuring the
ecological consequences of this novel and
developing technology. By contrasting it with
other alternative protein sources and conventional
meat production, the life cycle assessment (LCA)
of cultured meat aims to offer a comprehensive
understanding of its environmental effects.
4.1.LCA METHODOLOGY
4.1.1. GOAL AND SCOPE DEFINITION
In the context of cultured meat, LCA begins with
clearly defining the goal and scope of the
assessment. This includes defining the functional
unit, which might be another relevant metric or a
unit of mass (one kilogram of cultured meat, for
example). The system boundaries are also
established, indicating which phases of the life
cycle of the cultured meat will be addressed in the
evaluation.
4.1.2. INVENTORY ANALYSIS
The inventory analysis is a crucial step where all
the materials, energy flows, and processes within
the defined system are thoroughly described. This
includes identifying and quantifying inputs such
as raw materials, energy, and water, as well as
outputs such as emissions and waste generated
during each stage of the life cycle.
 4.1.3. LIFE-CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
(LCIA)
In LCIA, the environmental impact boundaries
for the assessment are established by performing
computational calculations on the inventory data.
There are numerous LCIA techniques, and each
one provides a unique viewpoint on the effects on
the environment. These techniques transform
inventory data into several midpoint and endpoint
impact categories. Common LCIA methods
include ecological footprint, cumulated energy
demand, CML, eco-indicator, IMPACT 2002+,
USEtox 2.01, EDIP 2003, IMPACT world+,
ReCiPe, ILCD 2011, TRACI 2.1, LC-Impact and
ecological scarcity, among others.
4.1.4. INTERPRETATION
The generated data is examined and conclusions
are made during the interpretation step. This
phase considering the combined impact
categories and seeks to offer a comprehensive
picture of the environmental effects related to the
production of cultured meat. For a robust
interpretation to be ensured, stakeholder
interaction, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty
assessment are essential.
4.2.IMPORTANCE OF LCA IN ASSESSING
CULTURED MEAT'S ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT.
LCA enables a holistic assessment of cultured
meat by considering all stages of its life cycle.
This includes aspects often overlooked in
traditional assessments, such as raw material
extraction, energy use in processing, and
distribution. The use of international standards,
such as ISO 14040, ensures a standardized and
widely accepted methodology for conducting
LCAs. This consistency facilitates comparability
between different assessments and industries.
Numerous impact categories are provided by
9
LCIA methodologies, enabling a thorough
assessment of environmental effects. This entails
evaluating resource usage, land use, potential
toxicity, and greenhouse gas emissions. The
results of LCA provide decision-makers with
valuable information to guide choices towards
more sustainable practices. By understanding the
environmental trade-offs associated with cultured
meat production, stakeholders can make informed
decisions aligned with environmental goals.
4.3.CONCLUSIONS MADE BY LCA ON
CULTURED MEAT
Research analyzing the Life Cycle Assessment
(LCA) of cultured meat often suggests
encouraging sustainability benefits. Comparing
these assessments to conventional livestock
farming typically reveals lower greenhouse gas
emissions, more efficient use of land, and water
savings. It is acknowledged that producing meat
from cultures has the potential to be more
environmentally friendly and energy-efficient
than producing meat from conventional methods.
Enhancing the overall sustainability of cultured
meat is considered to require innovations in
technology, especially in cell culture media and
energy sources. Inferences, however, could differ
depending on particulars and presumptions in
every study. Although life cycle assessments
(LCAs) mostly concentrate on variables related to
the environment, other factors that are recognized
as crucial to the continued existence of cultured
meat as a sustainable alternative include customer
acceptance and behavior. The results of a popular
LCA study conducted by Tuomisto & Mattos
showed that the production of 1000 kg of cultured
meat is estimated to require 26-33 GJ of energy,
367-521 m3 of water, 190-230 m2 of land, and
results in 1900-2240 kg of CO2-equivalent
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A comparative
analysis with conventionally produced European
meat reveals significant environmental
advantages for cultured meat. Cultured meat
exhibits approximately 7-45% lower energy use,
with only poultry showing lower energy
requirements. Furthermore, cultured meat
demonstrates a substantial reduction of 78-96% in
GHG emissions, a remarkable 99% decrease in
land use, and a substantial 82-96% reduction in
water use, depending on the specific meat product
being compared. Despite acknowledged
uncertainty, the overall conclusion is that the
environmental impacts associated with cultured
meat production are significantly lower than those
of conventionally produced meat.
5. CHALLENGES IN CULTURED MEAT
PRODUCTION
The production of cultured meat encounters with
a variety of difficulties in the fields of economics,
technology, society, and regulations. One of the
main obstacles is the high cost of manufacturing,
which necessitates innovations and techniques for
scaling up in order to be economically
competitive with traditional meat. The
development of sustainable and affordable cell
culture media, which are necessary for cell
growth, is still a significant challenge. Another
challenge is finding appropriate scaffolding
materials that are safe, palatable, and
biodegradable while still having a texture similar
to that of traditional meat. Clear labeling
guidelines and regulatory approval are essential
for establishing consumer trust and navigating the
challenges of guaranteeing safety and following
rules. It is crucial to gain widespread customer
approval, which calls for initiatives to eliminate
doubt, deal with ethical issues, and guarantee that
the flavor and texture fulfill up to expectations. It
is essential to continuously innovate technology
in order to enhance efficiency and optimize
industrial processes. There are many obstacles in
the way of building large-scale facilities and
increasing manufacturing capacity to fulfill
demand worldwide. It is imperative to optimize
energy consumption during production while
10
considering cultural and social elements that are
associated with dietary preferences and traditions.
Successful integration of cultured meat into the
global food supply chain requires navigating a
complex array of problems, including ensuring
economic viability, attracting investments, and
building sustainable business models.
6. SOME ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
CAUSED BY CULTURED MEAT
Cultured mead has often been called “clean
meat”. Some food experts indeed consider that
cultured meat has the potential to drastically
reduce environmental externalities. To date, there
exist however only a few studies in the academic
literature. Studies also investigate the
environmental effects of cultured meat using an
anticipatory life cycle analysis, and compare the
findings with the impacts of beef, pig, and poultry
that have been documented. Additionally, they
discover that compared to livestock, cultured
meat requires less land and agricultural inputs.
But, they emphasize that these advantages might
be attained at the expense of increased energy use.
Studies reveal a threefold increase in energy
consumption for cultured meat, which can be
attributed to steam cleaning, a new growth
medium composition, and a different bioreactor
design for cultured meat. Some studies have
shown that compared to an array of meat
substitutes, including those based on gluten,
soymeal, or insects, cultured meat may produce
more externalities. Additionally, some
substances—like glucose and amino acids—must
be present in sufficient amounts in order to
produce cultured meat, and these ingredients have
a significant effect on the process' environmental
impact. According to some research, there may be
cheaper ways to obtain enhanced amino acids,
lipids, vitamins, and minerals through the use of
biomass from algae. This might lead to the
development of more environmentally friendly
methods. The overall environmental advantages
of producing cultured meat also rely significantly consumption. Continued research, development,
on the intended use of the land that would and public awareness efforts are crucial to
otherwise be utilized for raising livestock and unlocking the full potential of cultured meat and
consequently on estimates of the opportunity facilitating its integration into mainstream food
costs associated with carbon storage. Some systems.
studies conclude that in some situations, cultured
meat may not always be more climate-friendly,
despite the fact that they showed how typically it
produces far fewer greenhouse gases than
conventional meat. This is due to the fact that
CO2 emissions from energy generation in
cultured meat production, rather than methane or
nitrous oxide, are mostly responsible for the
emissions from regular meat, and CO2 stays in the
atmosphere for a longer period of time. As a
result, they discover that cultured meat may
potentially cause greater long-term impact on the
environment than conventional meat.

7. CONCLUSION

in conclusion, the results of this study highlight

the significant environmental advantages of
producing meat from cultures as opposed to
traditional meat production methods. When
compared to traditional meat production, the
analysis shows that producing 1000 kg of cultured
meat requires less energy input, less water usage,
less land use, and much lower greenhouse gas
emissions. Interestingly, cultured meat performs
better than conventional meat on a number of
metrics. Depending on the particular meat product
under consideration, these metrics include a 7–
45% reduction in energy use, a remarkable 78–
96% reduction in GHG emissions, a remarkable
99% reduction in land use, and a substantial 82–
96% decrease in water use. The overall pattern
indicates that cultured meat has great potential as
a more environmentally friendly and sustainable
meat substitute, regardless of acknowledged
uncertainties in the data. These results highlight
the potential of cultured meat to help address the
environmental issues related to the world's meat

11
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Alexander, P., Brown, C., Arneth, A., Dias, C., Finnigan, J., Moran, D. and Rounsevell, M.D., 2017.
Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land
use?. Global Food Security, 15, pp.22-32.
2. Chriki, S. and Hocquette, J.F., 2020. The myth of cultured meat: a review. Frontiers in nutrition, 7,
p.7.
3. Treich, N., 2021. Cultured meat: Promises and challenges. Environmental and Resource
Economics, 79(1), pp.33-61.
4. Rodríguez Escobar, M.I., Cadena, E., Nhu, T.T., Cooreman-Algoed, M., De Smet, S. and Dewulf,
J., 2021. Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint:
current status, gaps and recommendations. Foods, 10(12), p.2941.
5. Tuomisto, H.L. and Teixeira de Mattos, M.J., 2011. Environmental impacts of cultured meat
production. Environmental science & technology, 45(14), pp.6117-6123.
6. Mattick, C.S., Landis, A.E. and Allenby, B.R., 2015. A case for systemic environmental analysis of
cultured meat. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), pp.249-254.
7. Lynch, J. and Pierrehumbert, R., 2019. Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle. Frontiers
in sustainable food systems, p.5.
8. Bhat, Z.F. and Fayaz, H., 2011. Prospectus of cultured meat—advancing meat alternatives. Journal
of food science and technology, 48, pp.125-140.
9. Jairath, G., Mal, G., Gopinath, D. and Singh, B., 2021. A holistic approach to access the viability of
cultured meat: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 110, pp.700-710.
10. Munteanu, C., Mireşan, V., Răducu, C., Ihuţ, A., Uiuiu, P., Pop, D., Neacşu, A., Cenariu, M. and
Groza, I., 2021. Can cultured meat be an alternative to farm animal production for a sustainable and
healthier lifestyle?. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8, p.749298.
11. Gursel, I.V., Sturme, M., Hugenholtz, J. and Bruins, M., 2022. Review and analysis of studies on
sustainability of cultured meat.
12. Mancini, M.C. and Antonioli, F., 2022. The future of cultured meat between sustainability
expectations and socio-economic challenges. In Future Foods (pp. 331-350). Academic Press.

9. REFERENCE QUESTIONS

1. In what ways does the environmental impact of cultured meat production differ from that of
traditional livestock farming, and how do factors such as land use, water consumption, and
greenhouse gas emissions contribute to its overall sustainability?

2. Compare traditional meat and cultured meat in terms of health benefits, food safety and potential
drawbacks?

3. How does the adoption of cultured meat align with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12:
Responsible Consumption and Production, and (SDG) 15: life of land and to what extent can
cultured meat contribute to achieving targets related to sustainable and efficient resource utilization
within the food industry?
12
 Department of Food Science & Technology
Faculty of Applied Sciences
University of Sri Jayewardenepura

B.Sc. (Special) Degree Programme in Food Science & Technology

Year III - Semester II

FST 368 2.0 Emerging Food Technologies and Bio-Technology

Lecturer
Senior Prof. K.K.D.S. Ranaweera

EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF “INSECT PROTEINS” AS A SUSTAINABLE

SOURCE OF NUTRITION FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS

Dissanayake D.M.I.A.
AS2020723
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF “INSECT PROTEINS” AS A SUSTAINABLE SOURCE OF
NUTRITION FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS
ABSTRACT
Due to the increase of the world’s population, protein
demand will also increase drastically in the coming
decades. However, since existing conventional
livestock farming is unsustainable scientists are
doing research for alternative solutions for it. In that
case, insect proteins play a major role. This report
mainly highlights the potential of insect proteins as
a sustainable, environmentally friendly, novel, and
comparative nutritious alternative protein source for
future generations. Also, this report provides an
overview of extraction methods, production and
processing technologies, functional properties and
applications in the food industry, consumer
acceptance and regulatory considerations,
challenges, and future directions of insect proteins.
Ultimately this report offers concluding remarks to
integrate insect proteins into the current food supply
chain.
Keywords: Insect proteins, Alternative protein
source, Extraction methods, Functional properties,
Nutritional profile, Sustainability, Applications,
Challenges
1. Introduction
According to the data from the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, by 2025 it has
been estimated that the world population will reach
up to 9 billion. Due to that, global demand for
everything including food, land, and freshwater will
increase by 70%. As a result, urban and industrial
developments can happen by limiting productive
lands. Additionally, there might be competition
encountered with freshwater usage between food
production industries and urban developments. Also,
both two aspects will attack biodiversity too. That
means due to the increasing population food
production industries have to upgrade their
productivity while conserving limited freshwater
resources and limited land area.
As a result, people have to think about alternative
solutions to fulfill the demand for food across the
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
globe. Protein sources play a critical role in the food
industry. Conventional livestock farming is the main
industry that will generate almost all the protein-rich
animal sources. In addition, there are certain crop
cultivations like grains, pulses, and some vegetables
like winged beans and spinach that can be used as
alternative protein sources. However, grains and
pulses are not rich in all essential amino acids. So,
the easiest way to satisfy the protein requirement of
an individual is having animal-based foods.
However, livestock farming is the main contributor
to greenhouse gas emissions. According to a recent
global study, agriculture contributes to 92% of the
freshwater footprint, while animal products account
for about one-third of it. Therefore, it is crucial to
explore alternatives to conventional livestock
farming. For that, insect proteins have emerged as a
prominent substitute due to their nutritional content,
environmentally friendly, sustainability, and
potential to contribute to food security.
The increased trend of use of insect proteins as
sustainable protein sources has numerous benefits.
From a nutritional aspect, edible insects are rich in
proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals. Also, insects
require less water, land, and feed than traditional
livestock. Their contribution to greenhouse gas
emissions is also in a minimum range. Thus, not only
from the point of the ecosystem but also, from the
point of human health consuming insect proteins
contributes positively. So, insect protein presents a
forcing opportunity to address the global demand for
sustainable and nutritious protein sources. With
ongoing investments, research, and innovations
insect protein has the potential to play a remarkable
role in shaping the future of food and contributing to
a more sustainable, flexible, and resilient food
system.
This report is aimed at insect proteins mainly from
their nutritional, and sustainable aspects and their
potential emerging applications in the food industry
as well as the challenges encountered with ethical
and consumer acceptance aspects.
2|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
2. Key findings from literature review
Insect consumption is also known as entomophagy.
So, this entomophagy is not a new concept. Studies
like Imathiu (2020) have shown that thousands of
years before people who were living in Africa-like
regions had their own tools for hunting insects as
they had a wide variety of insects throughout the
year. In the African countries, China like Asian
countries and Latin American countries insects are
considered as a staple diet. Research by Lesnik JJ
(2018) has found that at present around 2 billion
people live in 113 countries are eating insects.
According to the research conducted by Baiano
(2020) China, Thailand, Mexico, and India have the
highest edible insect species across the world. He
also has found that in Western countries
consumption of insects is uncommon and culturally
objectionable. Through the study by Wendin &
Nyberg (2021), it has been highlighted that the major
reasons for the unacceptability of insect foods in
Western countries are the neophobia and
unfamiliarity with the texture, flavour, and taste of
insects. However, Imathiu (2020) reported that the
consumption of edible insects has attracted greater
focus globally as efforts to develop sustainable
protein sources to satisfy the rising demand for
animal proteins worldwide.
Numerous edible insect species possess complete
amino acid profiles that are of higher quality than
those of legumes and equal to animal proteins,
according to studies like Rumpold & Schluter
(2013). For instance, they have given evidence that
crickets can help with protein deficiencies since they
provide all important essential amino acids in the
correct amounts. Crickets can boast 54% more
protein content exceeding beef. Rumpold and
Schluter (2013) have also found that grasshoppers
like insects lack certain essential amino acids. Also,
it has been reported that house crickets are rich in
iron, exceeding beef liver. Insects that are rich in all
essential amino acids are significant for individuals
who are struggling with protein deficiencies like
nutritional issues.
Some research has been conducted on the
digestibility of insect proteins. Generally, the
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
digestibility of insect proteins varies on both species
and the processing techniques. Yi et al (2013) have
discovered that the highly digestible (80-90%)
cricket protein is suitable for human consumption.
Also, digestibility of grasshopper proteins exceeds
80%. But still, there is a critical research gap in the
investigation of the digestibility of insect proteins
depending on the different insect varieties. Thus,
further studies are needed to address this research
gap.
Generally, bioavailability reflects the ability of the
body to absorb and utilize nutrients. Based on the
processing techniques used, the bioavailability of
insect minerals varies according to research by
Ramos-Elorduy et al. (2009). For example,
fermentation, one of the main processing techniques
can increase mealworm larvae's iron bioavailability.
Additionally, methods like extrusion also can
enhance the bioavailability of insect proteins.
As stated above, many countries have cultural
barriers to consumption of insects. House (2016) has
emphasized the effect and impact of historical
background, religious opinions, and disgust
sensitivity on the acceptance of insect protein.
At the social perception, consumers are more likely
to consume processed insect products like powders,
flours, and protein bars, instead of consuming whole
insects as they are. Hartmann et al. (2015) have
revealed that the design of the product, and
processing techniques are according to consumer
behaviour. It is important to address the ethical
issues encountered with the well-being of insects and
the possible environmental effects of large-scale
farming as an ethical concern. Research done by
Morales-Ramos et al. (2018) supports sustainable
agricultural techniques and compassionate and
friendly animal-raising practices.
The remarkable amino acid composition of insects,
ease of digestion, and possible bioavailability enable
insect proteins as a competitive and sustainable
substitute for conventional protein sources.
However, it is crucial to address the cultural, social,
and ethical issues through research to realize their
full potential and promote a more sustainable food
system in the near future.
3|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
Figure 1: Edible insects as sustainable alternative protein sources
Source: Andrea M. et al (2022) 13, Insect as an Alternative Protein Source, page. 21
3. Types of Insects used in Entomophagy
Insects come from a wide variety of species and are
consumed by individuals across the world according
to their culture and region. Approximately 1,900
species of edible insects have been discovered and
are consumed globally. These include bees, wasps,
caterpillars, beetles, ants, grasshoppers, cicadas,
locusts, leafhoppers, crickets, termites, flies, and
dragonflies, among others.
Mainly, edible insects can be categorized into eight
orders. These orders are Blattodea (Cockroaches,
termites), Coleoptera (Grubs, weevils, beetles),
Diptera (flies), Hemiptera (Stink bugs, true bugs,
cicadas), Hymenoptera (Ants, wasps, bees),
Lepidoptera (Moths, butterflies), Odonata
(Damselflies, dragonflies), and Orthoptera (Crickets,
locusts, grasshoppers).
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
Among all these edible insects only a few species are
commercially reared for consumption. The majority
of edible insects are wild-harvested. Coleoptera
order has around 350,000 species, which is the
largest animal order on earth. Among them around
656 species are consumed by people at their larval
form. House crickets, cochineals, silkworms, and
bees are the major insect species that are recognized
as fully domesticated. House crickets (A.
domesticus), yellow mealworms (T. molitor), and
tropical banded crickets (G. sigillatus) have shown
more successful rearing ability. Thus, those species
are widely reared worldwide for human
consumption. Cricket species are mainly consumed
by North American people, while mealworms, and
silkworms are mostly used by European people.
Grasshoppers, beetles, and locusts are commonly
consumed by China and Thailand people.
4|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
4. Processing methods of Insect Proteins
Even when the sustainability of insects may
encourage individuals to consume them, that factor
is not strong enough to remove their negative
perception of consuming insects as food. According
to the research conducted by Wendin & Nyberg
(2021) has been shown that low consumer
acceptance for edible insects is governed by strange
flavour, taste, texture, and some emotional factors
like disgust. Therefore, discovering possible
strategies to enhance consumer acceptance is very
crucial. Thus, to be exposed to the market nowadays
insects powders are used as ingredients in commonly
consumed food products instead of selling them as
whole insects.
Transforming insects into nonrecognizable forms
like insect protein powders and textured products to
be used in beverages, snack products, bakery
products, meat analogues, and the dairy industry are
the best options to increase the palatability and
acceptability of insect proteins. Thus, today mainly
there are three types of forms of insect proteins
available; recognizable whole insects,
nonrecognizable processed insects, and insect
protein extracts.
In a practical scenario, when consuming whole raw
insects some unpalatable body parts like wings, legs,
guts, antenna, and head are removed by processors.
For example, in the case of palm weevil larvae (R.
ferrugineus) it is important to remove the back end
of that insect to get rid of the pungent taste associated
with the juices in the digestive tract of larvae. When
consuming stink bugs, the head should be removed
and squeezed carefully. If not, they release some
kind of offensive odour. Therefore, before
consumption, it is essential to discard chemicals and
offensive-odour-producing secretion glands.
However, in addition to the negative effects on the
senses, potential health hazards linked with the
consumption of raw insects should be considered.
Thus, number of insect processing methods have
been employed as solutions for these drawbacks.
However, careful processing must be performed to
transfer raw insects into safe and appetizing foods.
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
4.1 Pre-processing methods
As the main pre-processing methods, harvesting,
stunning and killing, and cleaning and washing are
followed by the processors. Based on the type of
insects various techniques for harvesting are
available. For instance, mealworms are normally
harvested by shaking or sieving the containers, while
crickets are gathered by mechanically. After
harvesting the next step is stunning and killing. By
following this post-mortem movement can be
prevented thus, the quality of insect proteins can be
retained. Available methods under this step are
electrical stunning, CO2 exposure, and chilling.
Through cleaning and washing, the removal of frass,
debris, dirt, microorganisms, and other foreign
materials is achieved. This involves, washing or
sieving the insects multiple times in cold or tepid
water.
4.2 Processing methods
Drying, removal of unwanted and unpalatable body
parts, and milling and grinding are the major
processing steps. Through drying, spoilage of insects
is prevented by moisture removal. Fluidized bed
drying, freeze drying, oven drying, and sun drying
are some methods available for drying purposes. The
high temperature used in drying helps to decrease
microbial growth and population. Since drying is
linked with high temperature colour, flavour, and
aroma may change with time. But drying techniques
like freeze drying can be done at low temperatures
which can preserve nutrients, organoleptic properties
as well as sensory properties. But capital cost and
maintenance cost are high in freeze drying, hence
use of freeze drying is limited on a large scale. In
certain cases, the defatting step is followed using
solvent extraction, mechanical pressing, and
enzymatic techniques. But, the defatting step mainly
depends on the applications and the desired protein
content. Removal of indigestible parts includes
removal of chitin (indigestible polysaccharide
exoskeleton of insects), hard hairs, spiky areas gut
contents, and so on. This step is followed to
minimize the chance of occurring intestinal
constipation and to prevent harsh sensations in the
mouth. The purpose of removing gut content is to
5|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
remove disease-causing and spoilage-causing
pathogens. Gut-loading or the opposite of degutting,
also has been employed to enhance the desired
nutrient levels in the gut. For example, it will
increase the vitamin A content and calcium:protein
ratio. After that grinding or milling is proceeded
depending on the final product. Here insects are
subjected to milling step to an appropriate size.
Defatting also can be done after milling as insect
flour contains 8-50% of fat. Thus, it can be easily
subjected to lipid oxidation.
4.3 Further processing methods
Protein extraction, -flavouring and texturing can be
considered as further processing methods. Insect
protein extraction can be done through solvent
extraction, membrane filtration and isoelectric
precipitation. Using these techniques different
protein fractions with different functions can be
isolated. Although some individuals are not familiar,
naturally insects have its own flavour and texture.
Therefore, by adding, spices, flavouring agents, and
other components palatability can be increased.
Figure 2: Different insect processing methods for human consumption
Source: Andrea M. et al (2022) 13, Insect as an Alternative Protein Source, page. 25
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
Through extrusion texture similar to nuggets and
meat can be obtained as one of the texturizing
methods.
4.4 Effects of processing methods on insects
All these above-mentioned, processing methods and
further processing methods come under the
production of nonrecognizable processed insect
foods. When considering recognizable whole
insects, insects are subjected to cooking, roasting,
pan and deep frying, blanching, smoking, stewing,
and so on. These techniques will ensure microbial
safety by removing and killing undesirable bacteria,
yeasts, and molds. It has also been found that above
mentioned heating techniques reduce the para-
allergen tropomyosin immunoreactivity. The
inactivation of enzymes, and increase of
digestibility, palatability, and nutritional
composition happen because of processing methods.
Through the creation of inter and intra-biochemical
interactions during these processing methods, like
lipid oxidation, proteolysis, and vitamin and mineral
solubilization, chemical and nutritional composition
may change.
6|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
It has been found that drying, boiling and toasting
will cause to remarkable increase in protein content
and a decrease in fat on a dry basis. For instance,
certain proteins show some structural changes
during boiling such as crosslinking, denaturation,
and lipid-carbohydrate interactions. These
modifications affect the sorption capabilities of
insect proteins. Additionally, due to lipid oxidations
and nonenzymatic browning reactions colour
alterations can be there. Similarly, the potential
bioavailability of some nutrients is forced by those
processing methods. Scientists have conducted
several studies to develop edible fermented insect
products like paste, powders, and sauces using
fermentation as a processing technique to generate
secondary metabolites. Those secondary metabolites
give antimicrobial and nutritional benefits.
5. Nutritional profile of insect proteins
Typically, most insect protein species have a high
amount, of proteins, fatty acids, vitamins, minerals,
and fiber. They are a good source of quality proteins
and are condensed with nutrients for both developing
and developed countries. Through various research
like chemical analysis, scientists have discovered
that there is a huge variation of nutrients based on
the species, type, diet, development stage, and insect
habitat. As mentioned above, the nutritional
composition of insects is mainly affected by
processing and preparation methods like baking,
boiling, drying, and frying. As a general overview
and based on the data obtained from various research
papers, it has been found that insects contain protein
with all essential amino acids (20-76% Dry Basis),
lipid (2-50% Dry Basis), fiber (5-12%), chitin (2.7-
49.8 mg/kg of Wet Basis). Additionally, insects
contain minerals such as phosphorous, calcium,
magnesium, and potassium.
5.1 Protein profile of insects
Andrea et al. (2022) evaluated the total protein
content of 8 orders of insects on a dry basis.
According to Bednarova (2013), total protein
content varies between 38.4%-62.2% on a dry basis.
But, Bukkens (2005) has said that the protein content
of 17 selected insect species lies at 52%-80% on a
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
dry basis. Based on the study conducted by Ramos-
Elorduy et al. (1997) 15%-81% of protein content
has found from around 78 insect species
When considering protein content, insect proteins
contain both essential and non-essential amino acids.
Out of these two essential amino acids are not
synthesized within the human body. Therefore, those
amino acids need to be taken from externally as
foods. Although some plant protein sources are rich
in proteins, concerning nutritive value it is lower
than that of animals. The reason for that is the
deficient or unbalanced essential amino acid content.
In comparison to pork, lamb, chicken, and beef like
animal protein sources, several insects like
caterpillars, grasshoppers, weevils, and termites as
well as houseflies are higher in protein by weight.
When evaluating the importance of entomophagy,
the protein content of insects plays a major role.
According to some studies, edible insects from
Orthoptera consist of high amounts of proteins and
they can be considered valuable protein source
alternatives. In grasshopper species, around 77%
protein content on a dry basis has been found.
5.2 Amino acid profile of insects
Similarly, to proteins, the amino acid profiles of
various insect species vary depending on the order
and the species. Xiaoming et al., (2010) have shown
that out of all amino acids in 100 edible insects
around 46%-96% of essential amino acids are there.
Andera et al., (2022) have developed a table on the
topic of amino acid composition of different insects
and their comparison with soya, beef, and eggs.
From that study, the research team has shown that
the amino acid profile of many edible insects is
higher than that of egg, beef, and soya.
In almost all insect species, high amounts on a dry
basis have been reported in terms of leucine,
isoleucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, and glycine-like
amino acids. Arginine, cysteine, and tyrosine are
semi-essential amino acids present in insects. Almost
all edible insects provide essential amino acids
which are enough to fulfill human requirements.
Andera et al., (2022) said that the amino acid profile
of edible insects meets the daily requirement of
7|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
amino acids of individuals not only in terms of
human adults but also in terms of infants although
their Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) is typically
higher than adults. Some edible insects can provide
RDI of histidine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine +
tyrosine, and cysteine + methionine in infants. As a
real factor, infants receive twice the daily
requirement of phenylalanine+tyrosine from
orthopteran species.
As previously mentioned in the introduction part of
this report, to complement essential amino acid
deficiencies in diets, edible insects are used to get
missing amino acids. There are several instances
provided by Andera et al., (2022). According to the
team, people in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo, have complemented staples' lack of lysine
with lysine-rich caterpillars. In Papua New Guinea,
lysine and leucine-rich palm weevil larvae
complement lysine and leucine-lack tubers. Here
while weevil helps to complete the amino acid
profile, tubers give aromatic amino acids and
tryptophan. There is another perfect example in
African countries. In African countries most staple
food is maize. But it has lysine and tryptophan
deficiency. So, people complement maize with some
termite species to fulfill their requirements.
5.3 Fatty acid profile of insects
In many typical research based on insect proteins,
mainly scientists focused on the protein profile of
insects. However, it is crucial to consider the fat
profile of proteins as it is a kind of byproduct
obtained from protein isolation. Fats provide
essential amino acids as well as energy for humans.
The main factors affecting for fat content of insects
are the species and the diets given to them. Termites
and the larvae of palm weevil are the best insect
sources that provide highest fat content. According
to some studies it has shown that fat content of edible
insects varies from 10-60% on a dry basis. When
compared to adult insects larvae stage has high fat
content. Typically, caterpillars and termites are
abundant in fat. According to some studies, in
grasshoppers, fat content varies between 3.8-
5.3g/100g.
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
When considering fatty acid analysis, edible insects
mostly contain unsaturated fatty acids like oleic,
linoleic and linolenic acids. Out of them, most fatty
acids are polyunsaturated fatty acids. In some insect
species, essential fatty acids like linolenic and
linoleic acids can be seen in higher amounts than in
meat. High palmitic acid content is there in % of
insects. Crickets contain 77.5 % linolenic, linoleic,
and oleic acid content. Crickets contain an optimum
balance between omega 3 and omega 6. When
compared to chicken and fish, in most insects, the
saturated or unsaturated fatty acid ratio is normally
less than 40% though the concentration of
polyunsaturated acids, such as linoleic and linolenic
acids is higher in edible insects. Though beef has
higher stearic, palmitic, and palmitoleic, it is less
than of mealworms, but they have larger
concentrations of important linoleic acids than beef.
As a conclusion, insect fatty acids are healthier than
fish because of their high amount of unsaturated fatty
acids.
5.4 Micronutrients, fiber and vitamins
As stated above, almost all edible insects are rich in
vitamins minerals, and fibers. Most insect species
that are commonly consumed by humans are rich in
iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), magnesium
(Mg), zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), and phosphorus (P)
like minerals. Vitamin B2 (riboflavin), vitamin B5
(pantothenic acid), folic acid, and biotin-like
vitamins are also available in edible insects. In
comparison to beef equal amount of iron amount is
available in most insects. For instance, L. migratoria
and G. belina have 8-20mg/100g and 31-77mg/100g
iron content on a dry basis. But iron content in beef
is about 6mg/100g. Some species like R. phoenicis
larvae have 26.5mg/100g while mopane caterpillars
have 14mg/100g zinc amount. All these amounts are
calculated on a dry matter basis. Many
insects like grasshoppers, crickets, and ants have
extremely high calcium (Ca) content. Vitamin B3
(niacin), zinc, magnesium, iron, and calcium, are
abundant in houseflies. And also, the considerably
highest concentrations, of potassium, zinc, calcium,
iron-like minerals and vitamin B12, and niacin can be
found in larvae of the black soldier fly. Nymphs of
8|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
crickets and cockroaches are excellent sources of
vitamin B12, with 59 times as much as chicken, 7
times as much as salmon, and 11 times as much as
beef. Termites are also abundant in zinc and iron.
Akhtar et al., (2018) have mentioned that houseflies
are rich in vitamin B3 whose content is more than that
of salmon, beef, and chicken. Crickets are condensed
with 15 times more magnesium, 71 times more
calcium, and 2.5 times more vitamin B12 than beef.
In addition, the team has discovered that soldier fly
larvae have 71 times more calcium, 2 times more
magnesium, and zinc, 15 times more thiamin, 2.6
times more vitamin B12, and 9 times more vitamin B2.
Some insects like palm weevil larvae also rich in
vitamin E ranging from 9-35mg/100g on a dry basis.
However, the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) of
vitamin E is 15mg.
Iron is a very good example of one of the major
minerals that is mainly obtained from animal
products, not much from plant products. Therefore,
there is a huge global issue concerning protein
deficiency, especially in developing countries. Some
studies have found that about 1 billion people are
having anemia (because of iron deficiency), while
around 2 billion people are struggling with zinc
deficiency. To address those health issues
consumption of insect proteins is a good solution.
When considering the fiber content of insects, they
contain a high amount of fiber. The most significant
fiber component present in insects is the chitin which
is the major component found in insect exoskeleton.
Typically, chitin content varies between 2.7-
49.8mg/kg (On a wet weight basis) among different
insect varieties. Chitin has some kind of defense
against allergic reactions and some infections caused
by parasites.
6. Functional properties of insect proteins
Not only the edible insect proteins have a remarkable
nutritional profile, but also, they also have several
exciting functional properties that make them an
exciting and versatile ingredient for researchers,
food scientists, and as well as food manufacturers. In
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
this part of the report mainly focused on the
functional qualities of insect proteins.
6.1 Solubility
6.1.1 Introduction
One of the most important functional properties is
the solubility. Depending on the insect species, type
of protein, and the extraction techniques solubility
may vary. The use of insects in many food
applications is greatly forced by this unique simple
property. For instance, proteins extracted by
grasshoppers easily dissolve in water while proteins
extracted from mealworms require a higher pH or
more alkaline conditions than normal conditions.
Such kinds of properties navigate food
manufacturers to an array of food applications with
unique mouthfeels and textures.
pH of the medium is the most important factor that
governs the solubility of the insect proteins.
Similarly like in the case of other general animal
proteins, insect proteins are also least soluble at their
iso-electric point. In the case of black soldier flies
and mealworms, the isoelectric point of both proteins
resides around 4 pH. Getting a better understanding
of this pH dependence enables scientists to
customize and modify protein functionality and
extraction methods depending on the particular
usage.
Solubility also depends on the solvent types. Water
is the normal solvent. Alcohol can be used to extract
specific protein fractions while salt solutions also
can act as a good solvent, with excellent solvation
ability. These factors make it possible to innovate
and develop novel food products with unique
qualities based on insect proteins.
6.1.2 Impact on Food Design
For developing novel food products having a better
understanding of the solubility of insect proteins is
very essential. For example, since water-soluble
proteins are readily soluble in water and form gels,
they can be mainly incorporated to develop soup-like
products and to some sausages. But oil-loving
9|Page
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
proteins can act as stabilizers, and emulsifiers in
developing mayonnaise-like products and salad
dressings.
6.2 Emulsification and foaming
6.2.1 Introduction & Impact on Food Design
Another important functional property that leads
insect proteins to innovate a wider product range is
the ability to emulsify and foam. Due to the
amphiphilic nature of the insect proteins, that means
since they have both hydrophilic and hydrophobic
ends, they have to ability to make a bridge in the gap
between oil and water, as both are refusing each
other. By bridging the gap, insect proteins can make
emulsions. In addition, they can trap air and form
long-lasting, and strong foams within the products.
However, this foaming and emulsification ability
depends on the type of protein, processing
conditions, and extraction methods. According to
some scientific studies it has been highlighted that
grasshopper proteins are excellent in emulsification,
while mealworm proteins are good at foaming. S
understanding these properties will allow scientists
and food producers to create massive products by
maximizing their functionality.
6.3 Water and oil holding capacity
6.3.1 Introduction & Impact on Food Design
Insect proteins are not only condensed with massive
nutrients but also act as sponges-like things that can
absorb as well as retain both oil and water. This
special property is known as the water holding
capacity (WHC) and the oil holding capacity (OHC).
These properties unlock huge applications and
possibilities in the food industry using insect
proteins. Proteins that have high WHC help to keep
food fresh and juicy preventing dryness, as they are
more likely as moisture magnets. This property helps
in developing burgers, sausages, and moist cookies
in the food industry.
Proteins that have high OHC normally stabilize
emulsions by preventing oil separation. As a result,
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
they can be used in products like sauces,
mayonnaise, and even in salad dressings. This is a
fascinating approach to developing food with a
minimum fat percentage without disturbing its taste
and texture.
6.4 Gelation ability
6.4.1 Introduction & Impact on Food Design
Gelation is another one of the key properties of
insect proteins. Insect proteins that are extracted
from underneath the skeleton, have a fascinating
possibility to transfer liquid to semi-solid gel
structures at very specific conditions. This is known
as gelation. But almost all insect proteins are not
good at gelation equally. It depends on the
concentration, protein type, temperature, and pH of
the medium. For example, although mealworm
proteins have excellent gelation ability cricket
proteins need specific enzymatic treatments or
specific pH adjustments to make gels.
When considering food applications insect proteins
can be used in burgers, fruit jellies, sauces, and soups
like products.
The gelation ability of insect proteins can expand
beyond the food industry. In the pharmaceutical
industry as thickeners and stabilizers for
encapsulation purposes, in the cosmetics industry as
thickeners and stabilizers for lotions and creams, and
in biomaterials to make regenerate medicines this
special functional property will play a major role.
6.5 Bioactive peptides
6.5.1 Introduction & Impact on Food Design
Bioactive peptides in insect proteins act as weapons
of them. These can boost our health also. As
bioactive compounds insects have antioxidant,
antimicrobial components, blood pressure
regulators, glycemic inhibitors, anticancer
components, antibacterial inhibitors, and anti-
inflammatory components. For instance, proteins
extracted from mealworms show good anti-
inflammatory and antioxidant activity. Black soldier
10 | P a g e
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
fly proteins have good antidiabetic and antimicrobial
properties. But proteins taken from grasshoppers
possess bioactive peptides that can regulate blood
pressure and cholesterol levels.
Fortified yogurts with antioxidant peptides derived
from insects, and protein bars enriched with anti-
inflammatory and anti-diabetic peptides are novel
research areas that employ bioactive peptides in
insect proteins in developing functional food
varieties. Also, these bioactive peptides can be
incorporated into supplements in nutraceuticals.
7. Applications of insect proteins in food and
beverage formulations
There are several numbers of applications within the
food and beverage industry using edible insects.
7.1 Bakery Industry
Generally, edible insects are mostly used in the
bakery industry for baked products and cereal
products including tortillas, pasta, cookies, and
breads. As an example, powdered roasted speckled
cockroach can be taken. Protein content of them
varies from 5-15% (w/w) on a dry basis. These
powders are mainly used in making breads as an
enrichment agent for wheat flour. Scientists have
discovered that 10% enrichment possesses the best
nutritional qualities that contain higher protein
(22.6% dry basis), and more fiber (2.3% dry basis).
Bread developed from these insect proteins has
above 75% consumer acceptance also.
Breads made from 5% mealworm insect flour, black
army flies flour, and house crickets flour show better
stability as well as excellent dough formation ability.
In such kinds of bread, the above-mentioned insect
flour will act as a good replacer for wheat flour. 10-
30% of cricket powder is also incorporated to
develop enriched bread products while using wheat
flour. Osimani et al., (2018) highlight that enriched
breads with cricket powder have more nutritional
value in terms of protein profile and fatty acid profile
when compared to breads made only from wheat
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
flour. Lysine, valine, tyrosine, and methionine are
rich in such kinds of enriched breads.
One study was conducted to develop a cereal snack
by enriching wheat flour with 20% yellow
mealworm powder dried using the microwave.
Another example of an insect-based baked product
is corn tortillas formulated using 20% cricket
powders. Comparable nutritional aspects, improved
sensory acceptability, and enhanced
physicochemical properties govern the edible insect
flours and powders to fortify staple foods.
Cookies are another baked product developed using
insect oil. Edible insect oil-enriched cookies are a
rich source of omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin E as well
as flavonoids when compared to cookies made using
plant-origin oils.
Additionally, crackers, chips, and popcorn like
existing products can be fortified with insect proteins
to enhance available protein content.
7.2 Meat and Dairy Industry
Nowadays scientists have worked on several
experiments to develop texturized insect proteins to
use as meat analogs, dairy, and egg replacements.
Sausages, hamburgers, and meatballs are formulated
using minced and cooked edible insects.
Additionally, instead of always thinking about the
protein profile of insects to derive different food
products, some research has been investigated to
develop foods using other components of insects.
For instance, butter and margarine-like spreadable
products are being tried to develop using lipids
extracted from edible insects. Here insect lipids are
used as alternatives for plant and animal lipids. The
research team has discovered that when the
substitution percentage is around 75%, the negative
impact on colour and the spreading ability can be
kept at a minimum range.
In addition, insect proteins are used as dairy
alternatives to develop yogurts, ice creams, and
cheese. The overall acceptability of all these
products can be retained at a maximum level by
incorporating insect proteins into them.
11 | P a g e
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
7.3 Beverage Industry
Products like smoothies, shakes, and protein-rich
drinks enriched using edible insect proteins are also
formulated by some manufacturers.
Cricket crunch smoothies are the best examples.
“Chirps”, and “Exo Protein” like big companies
are already producing protein powders from crickets.
Consumers want to just mix it with smoothies when
preparing them. These products have a distinct
pleasant natural flavour and complete amino acid
content. Mealworm muscle milk is another beverage
fortified with insect proteins.
In omega 3 Oasis smoothie grasshopper oil has been
included. It is a good source of omega-3 fatty acids
and these fatty acids are good for maintaining heart
health by preventing cardiovascular diseases.
Protein-fortified bars are another excellent
application in the food industry.
Nowadays scientists have conducted several
research to develop sparkling soda from cricket and
protein-fortified juices using insects.
8. Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, land usage, and
water usage are the three main parameters used to
measure environmental impact and sustainability.
Major GHGs are methane, carbon dioxide, and
nitrous oxide. They can increase global warming
potential (GWP). Thus, they can make changes in the
global climate.
Increasing food production without raising GHG
emissions is a critical aspect and major challenge
according to many international organizations.
According to the report released by the World
Research Institute by 2050, global food demand will
rise by 50% with increasing animal-based food
demand by 70%. To satisfy the demand for food, an
additional 593 million hectares should be cultivated.
That amount is estimated to the twice the size of
India.
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
In some developed countries like the United States,
major protein sources are dairy and beef like meat
consumption. As a percentage, it will cause 43%
land usage and 37% methane gas emissions. When
considering a general point of view, around 65% of
methane, 64% of ammonia, 35-40% of methane, and
9% of carbon dioxide are released by livestock
farming.
All these findings will create a requirement for
developing different kind of agricultural systems that
goes beyond traditional, conventional cultivations
and takes the responsibility of growing population.
According to some research, replacing at least 25%
of the animal protein derived from livestock farming
with other sustainable protein alternatives will
enable reforestation and will help to cut GHG
emissions by at least 4%. That amount is equal to 23
million metric tons/year.
Therefore, scientists have conducted different
research to find out solutions for that critical issue.
Although insect consumption is not a novel concept
insect cultivation and value-added products made
incorporating insects is a new research area for them.
During this research, they found that compared to
livestock farming edible insect cultivation requires
less water as well as land usage, and it will release
comparatively low GHGs. During their cultivation.
For instance, Andera et al., (2022) have stated that to
produce 1 kg of protein pigs use 50 m2, and castles
use 200 m2, while crickets use 15 m2. Moreover, to
produce 1 kg of protein, beef requires 20,000 L, pork
requires 3,500 L, and chicken requires 2,300 l. But
the water requirement of cricket cultivation is only
2,000 L to produce 1 kg.
Efficiency conversion of ingested foods (ECI),
means the weight taken by an animal per pound of
food intake by that animal. So, this ECI ratio is
higher in insects than other livestock animals. For
instance, to produce 1 kg of protein, house crickets
need 1.7 kg of feed, while beef needs 10 kg and pork
needs 5 kg respectively. In addition, short life cycles,
low cost for production, and rapid growth rate of
insects positively affect the increasement of insect
cultivation than conventional livestock farming.
12 | P a g e
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
9. Consumer Acceptance of insect proteins
People who live in Western, European, and South
Asian countries still there are huge negative impacts
and perceptions of the consumption of insects and
insect-derived products. Although it is safe to
consume people do not much prefer to have insects
to fulfill their dietary requirements. The major
challenge is the cultural dislike of eating insects.
Some research has been conducted to come across a
good understanding of how social norms and cultural
expectations affect consumer acceptance.
In many Western countries, insects are considered as
problem-makers. Therefore, still they are using
livestock-farmed animal-based products as major
protein sources. For instance, flies and mosquitoes
infect homes, termites destroy wooden materials,
and some insects contaminate food products. All
these problems act as repulsive factors between
consumers and insects. Not only that some insects
can also spread some diseases. For instance,
houseflies can transfer infectious agents to food
products before human consumption.
Insects like fleas, ticks, lice, and mosquitoes are
frequently responsible for several blood-borne
illnesses. Viral encephalitis, Lyme disease, malaria,
and Chagas disease are some of the diseases. In the
10th century, spiders like arthropods were
accountable for various illnesses. However, due to
all these things, few people are aware that very few
insects do harm, and most of them are helpful.
In addition to these diseases and illnesses caused by
some insects, preferences among people who live in
tropical countries, are other factors that influence
disgust among humans.
10. Regulatory Considerations
Standards and labeling are some legislative
restrictions and safety considerations in terms of
edible insects penetrating the global market.
In the western part of the world, before a couple of
years ago, insects were not recognized as food or a
source of nutrition. For instance, insects were
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
defined as impurities, by the Codex Alimentarius,
which is one of the major agencies that manage the
worldwide trade in food and animal products.
However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
in the USA has given regulatory authority for edible
insects. The act responsible for that was the Food
Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). Due to this act,
insect farms benefit, unless they will convert raw
agricultural products into processed foods. Insects
cultivated for the use of animal or pet food as well as
insects harvested in nature are not normally
permitted to be used for human consumption. Even
though, the US Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act states
that "insects are considered food if that is the
intended use." It is not permitted.
Good manufacturing practices, necessary
certifications, and necessary microbiological tests
should be done in insect farms. Also, sometimes
allergic conditions happen due to the consumption of
shellfish-like foods. Similarly, with the consumption
of insects, although they are edible, some allergic
reactions can take place in some people. Therefore,
in the United States, it is advisable to put allergen
label warnings when foods contain insects or insect
parts.
Based on European Rules, when insects are
cultivated for food purposes they are named “farm
animals”. Those can be raised only using approved
substrates and feed. Nowadays, whole insects as well
as their body parts are defined as “novel foods” by
the European Food Safety Authority. Before
receiving the market authorization, it is essential to
find solutions to address their safety considerations.
Legislative regulations that control their
manufacture and commercialization are also
necessary when raising farm animals.
Like other commonly available food sources, edible
insects also have some contaminants like microbes
and anti-nutritional factors. But heating-like
processing methods help to reduce that microbial
and antinutritional content. Blanching, frying,
drying, and boiling are other effective processing
methods that will lead to a reduction of those
negative factors.
13 | P a g e
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
11. Challenges
Developing novel products enriched with insect
proteins and insect components has a greater ability
for a both protein-rich and sustainable future in the
food sector. However, there are some barriers when
proofing this statement.
Physiological barriers play a major role in the
adoption of insect-based food products (IBF). Lack
of consumer acceptance is the most important
challenge that hinders the consumption of IBF. To
increase sensory optimization, it is important to
develop products with palatable flavors, familiar and
similar textures, and unrecognized insect parts.
Hence, the research and development sector are
significant for innovating and designing products
accordingly using innovative processing
technologies. In addition, increasing awareness
among people benefits of having insects is also
essential. When conducting that awareness
programme, it should be highlighted the health as
well as environmental benefits of insect proteins.
Moreover, to achieve successful market penetration,
it is crucial to get a better understanding of attitudes
and different cultural differences toward insect
consumption. Therefore, it is important to craft new
products targeting identified cultural behaviours.
Another major challenge occurs, due to the issues in
production and processing. That means processors
have to develop cost-effective, and efficient insect
production and processing methods. Having an
optimized farm system plays a major role. It ensures
consistent supply throughout the year and minimum
impact on the environment. Vertical farming and
automation are some examples of advancements.
Other issues come with standardization and quality
control. Across the year across the whole production,
it is crucial to ensure food hygiene, food safety, and
consistent unique nutritional content. Innovative
storage ideas to extend the shelf life of IBFs is
another challenge.
Regulatory requirements are another challenge food
manufacturers have to face during insect farming.
Gaining approval from the government for IBFs is
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
kind of a difficult operation. Sometimes those
regulations may hinder the market penetration.
Based on country-to-country regulations may vary.
Therefore, it requires costly and complex procedures
to follow to classify IBFs as emerging foods. To
develop consumer trust and to maintain regulatory
compliance transparent and clear labelling methods
are needed. The standardized label consists of
appropriate insect content and potential allergen
components. Before approval, it is essential to give
a complete list of physical, chemical, and
microbiological hazards related to the developed
products. After eating, mealworms and lesser
mealworms allergic reactions are being observed.
Solutions also should be found against high
production costs and limited market penetration.
Improved and developed breeds with maximum feed
conversion rates are the main solution for that.
Bees, wasps, and ants like insect species can produce
toxic compounds such as cyanogenic glycosides.
However, the problem is there are no risk or threat
evaluation criteria for consumed edible insects
indicating their ability to create more danger. This is
a huge research gap that researchers should address.
Also, there is a problem due to the heavy metal
accumulation (mainly cadmium and lead) in soil-
derived insects.
Environmental contaminants are another major
aspect to consider. These contaminants vary based
on the substrate type, consumption stage, life cycle,
processing methods, preparation methods, and
production methods. Insects have long life cycles
and don’t have bioaccumulate contaminants. In
Namibia, mortality from caterpillar ingestion has
been identified, while in Kenya botulism caused by
termites stored in plastic bags ultimately leads to
death.
However, the future of insect-based proteins is
sharpened by ongoing research and development,
leading to innovative processing methods, product
ideas, and consumer involvement. All these things
enable us to formulate nutritious and sustainable
foods shortly.
14 | P a g e
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies
12. The way forward
An emerging research area of edible insects is using
edible insects as space foods, like in the Mars
mission. Here enclosed agricultural systems could be
tried to provide needed food for sustaining life in
space missions. Due to the limitations caused by the
interplanetary environment, about typical animal
protein production, the most important thing is to
explore the methods to efficiently use biomass
energy, like breeding edible insects in typical
farmlands.
Another recent development is finding solutions for
the malnutrition problem in underdeveloped
countries. To produce protein as well as
micronutrient-rich diets especially for children and
infants in underdeveloped nations, diet formulations
using edible insects are done. Maize and sweet
potato are the main dietary crops used in some
African countries. In this study, porridge made from
sweet potato was incorporated with palm weevil and
crickets larvae, and that newly formulated product
was compared to the mixture of Weanimix (mixture
of maize, peanuts, and soybeans). Through that
research, it has been found that in addition to the
excellent nutritional content, the most important
thing is the reduced risk of aflatoxin contamination
than the typical conventional mixture.
Another recent advancement is the research to
determine the relationship between the processing
conditions and anti-nutritional factors in edible
insects because as a thumb rule, it is well known
some processing techniques have the possibility to
eliminate them. But this is another research gap,
which is still not covered by many researchers. So
further experiments should be needed to make a
bridge to vanish this research gap.
Regarding technological advancements, scientists
are trying to make some efforts to polish the value of
edible insects by employing them in
microencapsulation-like areas. In addition, the
incorporation of extrusion techniques in the edible
insect industry is another recent development. All
these things will help to mask the presence of insects
while preserving their nutritional value.
D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723
To replace typical protein-rich ingredients, a huge
quantity of insect biomass is needed. As a result, it is
necessary to develop automated rearing facilities,
which can lead to safe, dependable, and stable
products. The obstacle to addressing that emerging
sector is to promise a reliable and cost-effective
insect biomass supply with constant and excellent
quality and constant supply. In that case, strong
frameworks for regulations also need to be
established.
An overall, to be succussed in this field, as a world
it is necessary to have a close relationship as well as
collaboration between industry, academia, and the
government.
13. Conclusion
In context with the issues of global food security, this
analysis concludes with a persuasive image of the
prospect of edible insect proteins as nutritious,
wholesome, and sustainable alternatives for typical
protein sources. This report highlights compelling
proof to justify further, research and development of
edible insect-based food products mainly targeting
their protein profile, which has an outstanding
nutritional profile with proper quantities as well as
qualities and also positive environmental impact.
Compared to typical livestock, they emit low
amounts of GHGs and need less water, feed, and also
space.
But still, there are lots of obstacles and barriers to
insect consumption. To mask those cultural issues,
and customer issues, ongoing researches are done by
many scientists. As well as navigation the changing
regulatory environment is also essential. However,
the potential advantages are substantial, despite
ongoing challenges. Acceptance of insect proteins
leads to a more sustainable and robust food chain,
promising food security, and improving dietary
choices for upcoming generations.
This study is an outstanding guide for anybody
interested in this revolutionary field to make possible
the magic of edible insects to generate future foods.
15 | P a g e
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723

14. References
at two temperatures. Journal of Insects as Food and
Feed, 4(1), pp.51-60.
Akhtar, Y. and Isman, M.B., 2018. Insects as an
alternative protein source. In Proteins in food Osimani, A., Milanović, V., Cardinali, F., Roncolini,
processing (pp. 263-288). Woodhead Publishing. A., Garofalo, C., Clementi, F., Pasquini, M.,
Mozzon, M., Foligni, R., Raffaelli, N. and
Arnold, V.H., Joost, V.I., Harmke, K., Esther, M.,
Zamporlini, F., 2018. Bread enriched with cricket
Afton, H., Giulia, M. and Paul, V., 2013. Edible
powder (Acheta domesticus): A technological,
insects: future prospects for food and feed
microbiological and nutritional
security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
evaluation. Innovative food science & emerging
United Nations: Rome, Italy.
technologies, 48, pp.150-163.
Baiano A. 2020. Edible insects: an overview on
Ramos-Elorduy J. 2009. Anthropo-entomophagy:
nutritional characteristics, safety, farming,
cultures, evolution and sustainability. Entomol. Res.
production technologies, regulatory framework, and
39:271– 88
socio-economic and ethical implications. Trends
Food Sci. Technol. 100:35–50 Ramos-Elorduy, J., Moreno, J.M.P., Prado, E.E.,
Perez, M.A., Otero, J.L. and De Guevara, O.L., 1997.
Bednářová, M., 2013. Possibilities of Using Insects
Nutritional value of edible insects from the state of
as Food in the Czech Republic. Dissertation Thesis
Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of food composition and
Bukkens, S.G., 2005. Insects in the human diet: analysis, 10(2), pp.142-157.
nutritional aspects. Ecological implications of
Rumpold BA, Schlüter OK. 2013. Nutritional
minilivestock: potential of insects, rodents, frogs and
composition and safety aspects of edible insects.
snails, pp.545-577.Mendel University, Brno, pp. 50–
Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 57:802–23
92.
Van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H.,
Hartmann, C., Shi, J., Giusto, A. and Siegrist, M.,
Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G. and Vantomme,
2015. The psychology of eating insects: A cross-
P., 2013. Edible insects: future prospects for food
cultural comparison between Germany and
and feed security (No. 171). Food and agriculture
China. Food quality and preference, 44, pp.148-156.
organization of the United Nations.
House, J., 2016. Consumer acceptance of insect-
Wendin KME, Nyberg ME. 2021. Factors
based foods in the Netherlands: Academic and
influencing consumer perception and acceptability of
commercial implications. Appetite, 107, pp.47-58.
insect-based foods. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 40:67–71
Imathiu S. 2020. Benefits and food safety concerns
Xiaoming, C., Ying, F., Hong, Z. and Zhiyong, C.,
associated with consumption of edible insects. NFS
2010. Review of the nutritive value of edible
J. 18:1–11
insects. Forest insects as food: humans bite back, 85.
Lesnik JJ. 2018. Edible Insects and Human
Yi, L., Lakemond, C.M., Sagis, L.M., Eisner-
Evolution. Gainesville, FL: Univ. Press Fla.
Schadler, V., van Huis, A. and van Boekel, M.A.,
Liceaga, A.M., Aguilar-Toalá, J.E., Vallejo-Cordoba, 2013. Extraction and characterisation of protein
B., González-Córdova, A.F. and Hernández- fractions from five insect species. Food
Mendoza, A., 2022. Insects as an alternative protein chemistry, 141(4), pp.3341-3348.
source. Annual Review of Food Science and
Technology, 13, pp.19-34.
Morales-Ramos, J.A., Rojas, M.G. and Dossey, A.T.,
2018. Age-dependent food utilisation of Acheta
domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) in small groups

16 | P a g e
Insect Proteins - Emerging Technologies D.M.I.A. Dissanayake – AS2020723

Reference Questions
1. I. What is meant by the functional property of a protein? (2 marks)
II. State 4 functional properties of insect proteins. (8 marks)
III. Describe the recent advancements in understanding the functional properties of insect proteins
and how this knowledge may aid the development of novel and sustainable food products by
giving your recommendations for developing food products based on insect proteins.
(15 marks)

2. Compare and contrast insect proteins with conventional livestock-derived proteins in terms of their
nutritional quality, bioavailability and sustainability? (25 marks)

17 | P a g e
 Department of Food Science & Technology
Faculty of Applied Sciences
University of Sri Jayewardenepura

B.Sc. (Special) Degree Programme in Food Science & Technology

Year III - Semester II
FST 368 2.0

Emerging Food Technologies and Bio Technology

Lecturer
Senior Prof. K.K.D.S. Ranaweera

Urban Farming for Food Security

D.M.P.T. Dissanayake
AS2020724

1
Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3
The Challenge of Urbanization and Food Security ................................................................ 4
A. Rapid Urbanization........................................................................................................ 4
1. Unprecedented migration to urban areas ................................................................... 4
2. Shrinking agricultural land and rural-urban divide ....................................................... 5
B. Food Insecurity ............................................................................................................. 6
Urban Farming as a Solution................................................................................................. 7
A. Types of Urban farming ................................................................................................. 7
1. Backyard Gardens ..................................................................................................... 7
2. Tactical Gardens ........................................................................................................ 8
3. Street landscaping ..................................................................................................... 8
4. Forest gardening ........................................................................................................ 9
5. Greenhouses ............................................................................................................. 9
6. Rooftop gardens ...................................................................................................... 10
7. Green walls .............................................................................................................. 10
8. Vertical farms ........................................................................................................... 11
9. Animal husbandry .................................................................................................... 11
10. Aquaponics ............................................................................................................ 12
11. Community gardens .............................................................................................. 12
B. Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 13
1. Localized food production ........................................................................................ 13
2. Reduced environmental impact ................................................................................ 13
3. Social and economic empowerment ......................................................................... 14
4. Urban farming for sustainability ................................................................................ 15
Successful Urban Farming Initiatives .................................................................................. 16
Overcoming Challenges ...................................................................................................... 17
A. Limited Space ............................................................................................................. 18
B. Resource Constraints .................................................................................................. 19
C. Community Engagement............................................................................................. 20
Policy Implications .............................................................................................................. 21
Future Prospects................................................................................................................. 22
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 23
References : ....................................................................................................................... 25
Reference Questions .......................................................................................................... 26

2
Introduction
The agriculture sector is the most important factor influencing food security. Food security is
defined by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) as "the situation in which all people,
at all times, have physical, social, and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food
that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life." As a result,
making food available in adequate quality and quantity is regarded as a necessary condition for
economic progress, social interaction, political stability, and national security. Food security's
primary goal is for people to access enough food at all times and use it to suit their bodies'
needs. However, it should be highlighted that the food security programme's goal of boosting
agricultural food production for self-sufficiency has yet to be realized. According to the FAO,
food security exists when food is always available to everyone, they have access to it, and it is
nutritionally appropriate in terms of quantity, quality, and diversity, as well as acceptable
within their culture. To satisfy nutritional criteria, people must have access to food that meets
their needs for calories, protein, and minerals, as well as the means to purchase it and ensure
consistent supply. Food security includes four key components in the food supply dimension:
availability, stability, accessibility, and utilization. The food security pillars can be used as a
benchmark for measuring food security since they help people comprehend the importance of
having a sustainable food supply. However, the agriculture industry is constantly confronted
with various difficulties that contribute to an unsustainable food supply and directly jeopardise
food security in the country. Climate change, dwindling agricultural regions due to pressure
from rapid industrial expansion, and environmental degradation all pose significant difficulties
to this sector. Urban farming is a novel approach to agricultural activities that is thought to be
capable of overcoming these obstacles and ensuring food security. Urban farming refers to any
farming activity that occurs within the city limits, such as the growing of cash crops and food
crops, animal husbandry, forestry, and the growing of flowers and plants for gardens. Urban
farming boosts the global food supply without requiring further land clearing by growing crops
in urban areas. Although households from all socioeconomic groups engage in urban farming,
disadvantaged households are overrepresented. Farmers cultivate a variety of crops. Except for
individuals who use their backyard for farming, irrigation is uncommon. For many
impoverished farmers, only those with plots along a river may profit from the river's annual
floods, which bring nutrients and water into the soil. The first example involves ornamental
crops planted in plastic bags. Farming is done largely to increase households' food security.
Not just the quantity of food, as well as the dietary composition, is frequently cited as a
motivation to undertake urban farming. However, non-farmers can also gain from it. Farmers
frequently sell portions of their crops at a lesser price than the official marketplaces. Urban
food security is determined by several factors, including food availability, access, and quality.
All of these variables can be improved by urban farming. All of the agricultural methods
outlined have the potential to significantly improve food security for communities and families.
Cultivating crops in a home or community garden can increase food and nutrition security in

3
terms of self-consumption, independent of financial level. Urban horticulture is already making
significant contributions to the nutrition and security of food in underdeveloped countries.
Continuous movement from rural to urban areas is expected, particularly in emerging countries.
This is why urban horticulture will become increasingly important in the future.

Figure 1

The Challenge of Urbanization and Food Security

A. Rapid Urbanization

1. Unprecedented migration to urban areas

The country's capital cities dominate the economy, politics, and culture. As a result of this, the
city continues to attract a great number of migrants from all across the country. Most urban
farmers have lived in big cities for a long time. This contradicts the widely held belief that
urban farmers are new migrants from rural areas who simply continue their traditional way of
life in an urban environment before adjusting to the urban way of life. New migrants don't
move to the city to perform agriculture, but rather to seek official jobs. When this fails, many
of them seek access to land on which to cultivate food. However, to gain a plot, one must be
firmly established in the city. "Settled" means having the necessary personal (for example.,
ethnic) network via which land can be acquired. Few people in farming households in some
big cities work in the formal sector. Many people are unemployed or work part-time.

The unknown migration to urban areas can have significant counteraccusations for food
security in those areas. Then are some crucial ways in which this migration can impact food
security. As people resettle to Urban areas, the population viscosity rises, leading to an
advanced demand for food. This swell in demand can strain food force chains and distribution
systems, potentially causing dearths and price increases. Rapid urbanization frequently
outpaces the development of structures, including transportation and storehouse installations

4
for food. This can result in difficulties in transporting and storing perishable goods, leading to
destruction and dropping overall food security. Urban expansion frequently involves
converting agrarian land into domestic or marketable areas. This can reduce the vacuity of
pastoralist land, impacting the original food product and adding dependence on external
sources for food. Civic areas heavily calculate on complex force chains to bring food from
granges to consumers. Any dislocations in these force chains, similar to natural disasters,
transportation issues, or profitable shocks, can lead to food dearths and affect food security.
Urban migration may affect income differences among the civic population. Lower-income
groups may struggle to get nutritional food, leading to malnutrition and other health issues.
Food instability tends to be advanced among marginalized communities in Urban settings.
Settlers frequently settle in informal agreements with limited access to introductory services,
including proper food force. The lack of structure in these areas can complicate food
instability, as residents may face challenges in carrying a different and nutritional diet. Urban
areas may be more susceptible to the impacts of climate change, similar to extreme rainfall
events, which can disrupt food products and distribution. This vulnerability can further
compromise food security in civic settings. Increased urbanization can lead to an advanced
dependence on global food trade. This reliance makes urban areas more susceptible to
transnational request oscillations, trade controversies, or other geopolitical issues that can
affect the vacuity and affordability of food. Addressing the challenges of food security in
urban areas requires comprehensive planning and programs that concentrate on sustainable
civic development, effective food distribution systems, and social weal programs to support
vulnerable populations.

2. Shrinking agricultural land and rural-urban divide

The majority of the land was formerly owned by either local administrations or the government.
However, over the last 20 years, an increasing amount of land has been sold to private
developers for residential development. It is a process which has not only begun but will
continue for quite some time, as natural growth and in-migration will lead the city's population
to continue to rise rapidly. As a result, many of the open areas that remain now will gradually
be filled in by houses, roads, and other structures. From this standpoint, agricultural operations
in the city do not have a promising future because they are unable to compete with other
activities concerning benefits. Aside from the fact that backyard farming is unlikely to
disappear, there will always be open spaces, such as along roads, railway lines, and rivers, or
under power lines. Many poor urban people rely on crop agriculture or animal rearing within
city limits for a portion or all of their income. Any attempt to develop their farming becomes
too dangerous while there is no certainty of tenure. With agricultural land shrinking without
additional land-clearing activity, the agriculture sector must be able to increase productivity,
become more sustainable and reliable to achieve production efficiency and be able to renew
the resources necessary for the industry's continuity. Much of the world's degraded land has
been lost to erosion and human activity, and using fresh land for agricultural purposes is
difficult and expensive. Erosion can be produced by water and wind, salinization, or
desertification.

5
Shrinking agricultural land and the rural-urban divide can have a negative influence on food
security in urban areas. Reduced agricultural acreage reduces local food production, increasing
reliance on foreign supplies and contributing to potential urban shortages. As the rural-urban
relationship deteriorates, metropolitan regions become more reliant on food imports.
Disruptions in global supply systems might create vulnerabilities and food shortages. Reduced
local production and increased reliance on imports can lead to price volatility, making food
more expensive for urban inhabitants, particularly those with lower incomes. The rural-urban
divide may result in differences in availability to nutritional food, with urban areas having
difficulty acquiring various and healthful food choices. As urbanisation accelerates, the
demand for food rises, putting strain on existing infrastructure and supply systems and
potentially contributing to food insecurity. The rural-urban split can exacerbate social and
economic inequality. The rural-urban divide can exacerbate social and economic inequality,
with marginalised urban inhabitants experiencing greater barriers to acquiring sufficient and
healthy food. Addressing these issues necessitates comprehensive policies that encourage
sustainable agriculture, strengthen rural-urban linkages, and assure fair access to food resources
in cities.

B. Food Insecurity
Food insecurity is described as the lack of availability of enough food, or foods of suitable
quality, to satisfy one's fundamental needs. the state in which all inhabitants of a community
do not have access to "culturally acceptable, nutritionally adequate food through local, non-
emergency sources at all times". Accessibility, affordability, and food availability are the three
main characteristics of food security that can't be fully guaranteed in cities. There are more fast
food restaurants and fewer grocery stores in low-income districts within cities, a situation
known as a 'food desert'. Consequently, access to nutritious food, particularly vegetables and
fresh fruits, is limited in these places. If this issue is not addressed appropriately, it will lead to
other concerns like food insecurity, global hunger, and malnutrition. World food price patterns
can be used to assess the seriousness of food security issues. The price trend reflects the supply
of food on the market. It is an important factor since the availability of food in the market
influences the other three food security components.
As the world's population grows, food security, particularly in densely populated places such
as huge cities, becomes a major concern. To produce enough food to supply the people, it is
expected that additional land will be sacrificed in the future. More natural resources, including
fresh water and healthy land, are required to sustain the agricultural system. However, other
elements must be considered and can become important issues in agricultural product
production. The world is struggling with the expansion of population while also attempting to
provide the basic needs of humans in terms of food, housing, and other necessities, causing the
shrinkage of agricultural land to become too obvious, however, the demand for food is
increasing.

6
Urban Farming as a Solution

A. Types of Urban farming

Urban farming, as the name suggests, "is an industry located within a town, a city or metropolis,
which grows or raises, processes and distributes a diversity of food and non-food products
using largely human and material resources, products and services found in and around that
urban area, and in turn supplying products and services, material and human resources, largely
to that urban area". The main criteria that distinguish different techniques of urban agriculture
are the sorts of players involved, the products, the location of production, the types of economic
activities involved, the scale of production and technology, and the level of market orientation.
The urban region is the most densely populated since it is the core of human civilization. Urban
farming adapts the entire cultivation system to the urban environment. More technologically
advanced tools are required to enhance farming operations in cities since the environment
differs from that of traditional farming settings. Urban farming is viewed as a solution to the
food security challenge because this programme can alleviate the food crisis in urban areas.
This is due to the potential to grow horticulture crops such as fruits and vegetables of foods
needed by the community within the city area, making urban farming one of the possibilities
to increase the food security level of the city region.

1. Backyard Gardens
This is the cultivation of food on personal property. Its harvest is usually shared among family,
friends and neighbours because it usually results in a surplus yield. Food can be preserved and
stored. Backyard gardens benefit communities since neighbours may share their backyards and
use varied farming methods, resulting in higher returns.

Figure 2:Backyard Gardens

7
2. Tactical Gardens
This entails exploiting the little space provided to practise agriculture without incurring
significant costs. For example, an urban inhabitant may easily create a keyhole garden to cover
an area designated for street parking. This makes good use of land that would otherwise go to
waste by creating an activity that may be done for recreation or to produce more food.

Figure 3:Tactical Gardens

3. Street landscaping
includes the landscaping of streets for various purposes, such as community gardens that are
maintained by residents in the neighbourhood. They not only beautify the streets but also filter
the air, resulting in a cleaner atmosphere. Because they are primarily positioned along the
street, they have the advantage of minimising urban stormwater runoff.

Figure 4:Street landscaping

8
4. Forest gardening
It refers to the method of growing gardens within urban forests. Forest gardening involves
growing various vegetables, crops and fruits in urban areas. Forests typically generate an
environment that is beneficial for agricultural development, thus they help to ensure that forests
are secure and can make deforestation a nonfactor in urban areas. Forest gardening is
additionally applicable to afforestation activities, which promote tree planting as a means of
combating global warming in cities.

Figure 5:Forest gardening

5. Greenhouses
Agriculture is practised in commercial, residential, and social urban environments using
greenhouses. They take a large amount of area to put up, relying on the crops being grown.
Greenhouses allow farmers to grow crops all year round because they supply a controlled
environment in which crops can be treated to the particular conditions required for growth.

Figure 6:Greenhouses

9
6. Rooftop gardens
Agriculture can be conducted in urban environments despite the restricted space available.
Rooftop locations are ideal for growing fruits, vegetables, and herbs. Rooftop gardens can help
reduce urban heat islands while also enhancing air quality. Aside from this, rooftop gardens
can enhance recreational opportunities.

Figure 7:Rooftop gardens

7. Green walls
The term "green wall" refers to the cultivation of food crops or vegetation on the exterior or
interior of a wall. It takes very little space because the mechanism utilized provides appropriate
water to the food and makes use of soil on the walls. It is an effective approach for minimizing
stormwater runoff.

Figure 8:Green walls

10
8. Vertical farms
This could include farming vertically to reduce agricultural land footprint. Green walls can be
utilised as a way for vertical farms because they take up less space and are practised on the
sides of vertical walls. Plants are grown vertically in trays or towers rather than low to the
ground in long rows. These farms frequently use hydroponic growing technologies, which
allow the plants to develop faster than on regular soil-based farms. And because they are
usually contained in climate-controlled spaces, they can grow a variety of healthy foods all
year long, regardless of season or climate. Because the production systems aren't heavily reliant
on soil and climate elements, agriculture can occur all year round, regardless of weather
conditions. The systems operate without soil, avoiding agricultural runoff, which is currently
one of the most pressing challenges. Furthermore, better control over insecticides and fertilisers
is achievable. One of the most important benefits is that Vertical Farming does not rely on ideal
weather conditions. This way, even cities or locations with contaminated soil or severe weather
extremes might grow healthy food independently and sustainably from others.

Figure 9:Vertical farms

9. Animal husbandry
This is a way of raising animals for consumption in urban environments. An urban inhabitant
can select a place ideal for keeping a variety of animals or concentrate on a certain animal such
as poultry, rabbits, goats, or sheep. Some cities regulate both the amount and kinds of animals
that can be kept.

11
 Figure 10:Animal husbandry

10. Aquaponics
This refers to the practice of raising aquatic animals such as fish in urban environments. It
entails the use of a technology that collects stormwater from the city and then converts it into
a self-sustaining recirculating system in tanks or artificial fishponds. It is a cost-effective
method of crop production as well as a protein source.

Figure 11:Aquaponics

11. Community gardens

Many cities provide tiny pieces of land or rooftops for community members to cultivate as they
see fit. Simply Community gardening is the collaborative growing of plants by many
individuals in a common location. These community gardens are frequently included in
community development initiatives, to beautify a neighborhood while also bringing
community members together to develop something beneficial to all. They not only provide
local produce but also help clean the air and absorb carbon emissions.

12
 Figure 12:Community gardens

B. Benefits
Urban agriculture provides an opportunity to improve food supply, social integration, health
conditions, the local economy, and environmental sustainability.

1. Localized food production

It is claimed that growing fresh food such as fruits and vegetables, as well as animal products,
within the city limits, can improve local food security, particularly for underserved members
of the community. This programme also enhances fresh food availability, boosting food
accessibility within the range of populations, and providing enough nutrients for persons who
undertake urban gardening.

2. Reduced environmental impact

The poor, who typically lack the funds to purchase chemical inputs, cultivate the majority of
crops for subsistence purposes. As a result, it is unlikely that chemical pollution from urban
farming will be a serious concern. Soil erosion does occur in some metropolitan areas, and
farmers use a variety of methods for keeping the process under control. For example, dig
drainage ditches to prevent gully erosion. Crop leftovers were used to prevent sheet erosion
while also improving moisture retention. In some urban areas, Napier grass and bananas were
planted to alleviate floods caused by the River that flows through the area. In some regions,
untreated sewage water is used for irrigation. Although the company plays an important part in
waste recycling, there is no more than “a drop in the ocean”. Recycling, reusing organic waste,
and reducing energy use all help to reduce cities' ecological footprints. Urban food production

13
reduces logistical and storage expenses while also considerably reducing environmental
pollution through CO2 emissions. Agriculture is one of the largest causes of climate change. It
is anticipated that food production accounts for 20-30% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
In the situation of indoor farming systems, urban horticulture not only prevents food production
from being impacted by pollution or weather extremes caused by climate change, but it has the
potential to help mitigate climate change because these systems are more energy efficient and
thus emit less carbon dioxide. Its impact on climate change mitigation would be higher if the
systems were used on a bigger scale. However, hefty prices and policy constraints make this
unlikely in the future decades. However, urban agriculture in general has the potential to
alleviate climate change by reducing carbon emissions associated with food miles, storage,
cooling, and packaging.

3. Social and economic empowerment

Urban agriculture appears to benefit people in two ways: directly through increased energy and
protein consumption, and indirectly by allowing them to spend less money on food purchases
("fungible income"). To some extent, urban farmers' higher calorie intake translated into
improved nutritional conditions for their children. Urban farming, which is commonly
connected with the organic farming concept, decreases the danger of chemical contamination
in foods consumed by people. Urban farming can help alleviate urban poverty by lowering
household food expenditures while also increasing income for urban inhabitants by creating
new business options. Urban farming may be operated in a controlled setting, and the farm size
is lower than traditional farming, which makes it easier to control.
Participating in home gardening enables women to be more autonomous. Establishing
community gardens in this abandoned area will help local communities become more self-
sufficient, boost food and nutrition security, and have the potential to lower crime rates. It has
been noted that low-income minority families, in particular, face barriers to accessing healthful
and cheap meals.
By including these people in urban gardening, communities can be strengthened and their food
security dramatically improved. Many public schools incorporate urban gardening into their
curricula to raise awareness about healthy eating and teach science skills in a hands-on setting.
This is crucial for the urban environment, which is typically associated with unpleasant
conditions such as greater temperatures caused by heat islands and poor air quality. The
existence of an urban garden in the city can assist to lower the temperature and soften the view
by providing various green and pleasant surroundings. Urban farming consumes around 75%
less water than conventional farming, and a hectare of recirculating vegetable rooftop garden
can save over 75,000 tonnes of water each year. In terms of production costs, urban farmers
can increase their profit margins because urban farming eliminates the requirement for heavy
machinery and intensive labour, relying solely on manual labour provided by the owner and
community.

14
4. Urban farming for sustainability
Urban farming has a higher level of sustainability than traditional farming methods. It
encourages the use of organic materials such as organic waste and recyclable materials as tools
while using less water than traditional agriculture. This will also have an impact on the
environment, ecology, society, and the economy. Urban farming in large cities can provide
vegetation, which is beneficial to the area's biodiversity. Green roofs, which are part of an
urban farming system, can help to increase animal diversity by generating microhabitats suited
for insects, birds, and mammals. The reclamation of unused space in the urban area, such as
rooftops of buildings, for food production will improve urban dwellers' food security while
also reducing urban people's reliance on food supplies from rural areas, resulting in less land
clearing in rural areas for agriculture purposes. Recycling organic resources into composites
helps to reduce solid waste and the risk of environmental pollution. Rooftop farms also help
the buildings and the people who reside in them. It functions as an insulator against hot and
cold temperatures. It helps to lower the temperature of buildings during the summer and hot
days, requiring less use of electrical devices like air conditioners and electric fans. This form
of urban garden is appropriate for use in tropical and subtropical countries, such as the South
East Asian region, with hot and humid climates. The presence of an urban garden in the city
area also minimises the likelihood of heat island formation in the area. A chance for urban
inhabitants, particularly the underprivileged population, to grow their food and save money on
food. The expense of building a modest urban garden is low because it solely uses recycled
materials. This allows impoverished people to create gardens without incurring any additional
costs, hence reducing hunger among poor urban populations in the area. Urban gardening
supports business incubation for city dwellers, in addition to personal use. Because of the urban
population's awareness and healthy lifestyle, the market for fresh, healthy, and organically
grown fruits and vegetables has received a strong reaction. As a result, urban farming food has
a high potential for sale in the neighbourhood. Urban farmers' flexibility and lesser danger of
nature in the city allow them to fine-tune their operations and generate customer-focused food.
By selling urban farming produce to consumers, urban farmers can make cash while also
ensuring food security in their community. Urban farming also has the potential to improve
and boost the property value of urban farmers. As an urban garden boosts the greenery and
aesthetics of the surrounding region, it helps to generate a sense of community, offering better
places and environments for recreational purposes and allowing the adjacent households to
have a better quality of view. In the context of urban agriculture, self-reliance refers to the
ability to provide enough food for residents without relying on outside resources. Many cities
currently need self-sufficiency in veggies. That demonstrates the challenge of whether cities
can change into sustainable and self-regulating systems. The use of modern agriculture
technologies to help urban farming activity contributes to the program's success. Modern
agriculture technology and techniques have the potential to increase farmer productivity even
in small areas while also preserving natural resources, resulting in environmental conservation.
The agriculture industry uses energy conversion to produce input. Using renewable energy,
such as solar, in urban agriculture helps reduce the industry's influence on climate change and
greenhouse gas emissions. The approach allows the farming process to utilise less natural
resources while producing greater output, making this programme more sustainable than

15
traditional farming methods. Modern technologies also encourage collaboration between
agriculture and construction in urban areas. This allows farming to be done inside the building
as well as converting limited spaces, such as rooftops, into growing areas. New farming
techniques, such as vertical gardens and zero acreage, help urban inhabitants by allowing them
to raise their food in constrained urban settings.

Zero-acreage farming is gaining popularity in industrialised countries since it not only

integrates building and farming activities but also adds aesthetic value to the urban
environment. Growing plants in layers up to many stories can conserve space in cities where
land scarcity is a common concern. This is owing to the irrigation system of urban farming,
which is capable of recycling stormwater and converting it into an irrigation input, as well as
the use of substrate for moisture retention, which can reduce evaporation losses. This is the
key success factor for urban farming in terms of conserving natural resources and avoiding
excessive water consumption. This technology also aids with storm management, preventing
flash floods that are common in major cities when a significant storm strikes. The system serves
as a water storage and retention system, preventing stormwater from producing flash floods
when the city's drainage system fails to function owing to heavy rain. Regarding production,
urban farming is thought to yield more per square foot than conventional farming. Urban
farming is becoming increasingly popular in Asian countries due to its ability to produce larger
yields while also producing high-quality fruits and vegetables.

Successful Urban Farming Initiatives

In the twenty-first century, urban farming is becoming increasingly popular in industrialised
countries such as Singapore, China, and America. Rooftop gardens in Singapore demonstrate
how to make the most of limited areas while still integrating with urban infrastructure.

Figure 13: Rooftop gardens in Singapore

16
Vertical farming in Tokyo has brought cutting-edge technologies for efficient production and
year-round harvesting.

Figure 14: Vertical farming in Tokyo

Community gardens in New York City have two main characteristics: they promote social
relationships and alleviate food deserts.

Figure 15: Community gardens in New York

Overcoming Challenges
Urban horticulture boosts global food production by establishing new cultivation sites.
However, increasing land prices and urban pollution limit urban horticulture. The main
constraints of urban horticulture include limited access to land, a lack of property tenure, and
inadequate services and infrastructure for urban farmers.

17
A. Limited Space
One of the most noticeable characteristics of metropolitan settings is the presence of many open
spaces that are or can be used for farming. However, to meet future food demands, unoccupied
urban spaces should be regarded as potential locations to relieve strain on rural agriculture and
compensate for land loss. Turning abandoned sites into urban vegetable gardens improves food
security and sustainability. However, it is crucial not to place too much emphasis on densely
populated urban regions with little space. In other circumstances, shifting agriculture to peri-
urban regions may be more appropriate. To make the best use of these vacant urban spaces,
new agricultural methods are required. In Continuous Productive Urban Landscapes,
cultivation strategies typically range from small-scale gardening to high-yield commercial
gardening. In cities with little vacant land, infrequently used highways could be turned into
Continuous Productive Urban Landscapes and green spaces with adequate room for pedestrian
and cycling pathways. The main factors that influenced the decision to incorporate vegetable
production inside existing structures were resource conservation and increased efficiency.
Rooftops of schools, hotels, prisons, hospitals, supermarkets, and retail malls make great
locations for developing integrated agriculture. These rooftops are suitable for the placement
of greenhouses. Hydroponic systems, which are lighter than conventional greenhouses, may be
appropriate for rooftop placement.

Limited space in urban areas for urban farming can be overcome through innovative ways of
obtaining food security. In vertical farming, utilizing vertical space by growing crops in piled
layers or vertically inclined shells, frequently with hydroponic or aeroponic systems. When
rooftop Farming, Converting rooftops into productive agrarian spaces, using holders or
hydroponic systems to maximize the use of available area. In hydroponics and aeroponics,
growing plants without soil in nutrient-rich water results, in optimizing space and resource
effectiveness in controlled surroundings. Using containers, pots, or other movable structures
to grow pants, makes it possible to cultivate in small spaces like sundecks, quadrangles, or
indeed indoors. Integrating agriculture( fish farming) with hydroponics creates a symbiotic
system that utilizes space efficiently and reduces the need for additional resources. Cultivating
microgreens, which are small, nutrient-dense plants, and employing perpendicular walls to
grow crops in a space-effective manner. Constructing compact, controlled-environment
glasshouses that enable time-round civilization and cover crops from external factors.
Implementing modular Farming Systems that can be easily acclimated to spaces, allowing for
inflexibility in design and layout. In intensive agroforestry, combining trees and shrubs with
crops in a structured and space-effective manner promotes biodiversity and sustainable land
use. Smart farming technologies, use detectors, robotization, and precision ways to optimize
resource use, examine factory health, and increase productivity in constrained spaces. These
innovative ways influence technology and creative design to make the utmost of limited
space, contributing to the development of sustainable and productive Urban farming systems.

18
B. Resource Constraints
Adequate irrigation is required to obtain high yields and healthy produce. This could be
rainwater, tap water, harvested water, or wastewater. Wastewater is frequently utilised for
irrigation, particularly in Africa, due to its several advantages, including accessibility and
consistent supply. Fruits and vegetables are the most regularly grown crops in urban
environments, and both require a consistent water supply during their vegetative period.
Rainwater availability can be limited or unpredictable, necessitating irrigation methods,
particularly when cultivated in raised beds or container gardens. Water from hydrants and
rainwater collection are two often used techniques. Other water conservation approaches
include low-cost drip irrigation systems, water reuse (such as domestic greywater), and
mulching strategies. Non-soil growing techniques, such as aquaponic and hydroponic
cultivation, are considered water-efficient due to the constant reuse of water. To address water
scarcity, novel irrigation technologies such as drip irrigation, solution recycling, and
wastewater irrigation are being used. Recently, greenhouse energy consumption has been
reduced by the use of double and triple thermal screens, innovative covering materials, climate
management systems, energy-optimized farming programmes, and greenhouses as solar energy
storage. This occurred in the Netherlands with the project "de gesloten kas: the closed
greenhouse" and in Germany with "ZINEG: the low-energy greenhouse." All of these
systematic approaches, together with the use of alternative and renewable energies instead of
fossil fuels, can help to reduce energy consumption by 80-90% while operating a greenhouse
with the lowest CO2 emissions. Using renewable energy sources like solar or wind power to
power indoor farming facilities decreases dependency on traditional energy grids and lessens
the environmental effect of conventional energy sources. Using off-grid technologies fueled by
renewable energy for urban farming. This increases the robustness of food production by
lowering reliance on centralised energy infrastructure. Using energy-efficient technologies in
urban farming, such as LED lights for indoor cultivation and smart irrigation systems. These
technologies can improve resource efficiency and lower overall energy use. Producing biogas
from urban organic waste, such as food scraps and agricultural residues. This biogas can be
used as a renewable energy source for a variety of agricultural applications, including heating
and electricity generation. This is a common method for Implementing integrated energy and
food production, in which energy production and food cultivation complement one another.
For example, solar panels can be integrated into vertical farming structures and agricultural
waste can be used to produce biomass energy. Developing community microgrid systems
powered by renewable energy sources. These systems can support several urban agricultural
efforts, resulting in a decentralised and resilient energy infrastructure. Designing urban farms
that generate more energy than they use. This can be accomplished through a combination of
renewable energy sources, energy-saving technologies, and smart design approaches. Including
sustainable energy solutions in urban design for agricultural zones, guaranteeing that urban
farming activities are supported by environmentally friendly and energy-efficient
infrastructure. By adding sustainable energy sources into urban farming operations,
communities can alleviate resource limits, reduce environmental impact, and improve the
overall sustainability of urban food production. This technique helps to create more resilient
and self-sufficient urban food systems.

19
C. Community Engagement
Community gardens allow residents to use shared or subsidised land to improve their nutrition.
Many cities, including Argentina, Sri Lanka, and Madagascar, encourage school garden
programmes. These programmes are intended to give young kids fresh and nutritious food
education while also contributing to nutrition and food security. Crop theft is without a doubt
the most serious urban-specific concern. Thieves like crops like bananas, cocoyams, and maize
because they have a ready market and are hard to conceal. Although not highlighted as a (big)
issue, livestock theft does occur. Surprisingly few farmers identified harassment, eviction, or
crop destruction by local officials as a (significant) issue. This is relevant to the subject of land
tenure.
Uncertainty about the land utilised by farmers was also rarely mentioned as a key issue. This
is especially remarkable given that most farmers produce property that belongs to someone
else, thus they are constantly at risk of being evicted by the legitimate owner.
A recent study in Berlin found that vegetables cultivated in inner-city regions might acquire
significant levels of trace metals. The accumulation varied depending on the sort of vegetable.
Whereas leafy vegetables contained a significant concentration of trace metals, root vegetables
included just a moderate level. As a result, it cannot be stated that vegetables grown in inner
city regions are inherently harmful to human health. To reduce the risk of heavy metal uptake
from vegetables, cultivation areas must be carefully selected. Barriers between roadways and
cultivation areas can considerably reduce the danger of contamination. In locations where
contamination is more prevalent, it is recommended to grow non-edible crops for example
Christmas trees and crops that do not retain metals in their edible components. Plant cultivation
in raised beds or containers including boxes and rice sacks can help to prevent contamination
in polluted soil areas. On the one hand, urban areas are frequently contaminated by industry,
residential activities, and transportation. At the same time, agriculture is known for polluting
the environment through the application of pesticides, and chemical and organic fertilizers.
Organic agriculture has been encouraged to reduce pollution caused by urban farming.
Growing plants and vegetables in containers, aquaponic systems and hydroponic, or indoor
farms can reduce crop contamination and limit fertiliser and pesticide runoff into the
environment.
Inclusive design and governance are critical for increasing community participation in urban
farming for food security. Here's how. Participatory Decision-Making includes community
people in the decision-making process for urban farming programmes. Seek their input,
feedback, and preferences to ensure that plans are in line with the community's needs and goals.
Accessible Information gives easy-to-understand information regarding urban farming
programmes, such as advantages, participation opportunities, and relevant resources.
Transparency in communication promotes trust and involvement. Capacity Building provides
training programmes and workshops to help community members develop their skills and
understanding of urban farming methods. This enables individuals to actively participate in and
benefit from local food production. Equitable Access to Resources guarantees that resources
like land, water, and funding are divided evenly among community members. This eliminates
inequalities and provides an inclusive atmosphere for urban farming. Cultural Sensitivity
recognises and respects the diversity of the community. Customise urban agricultural projects

20
to reflect cultural preferences and customs, fostering inclusivity and building community
identity. Create urban farming places that are accessible to people of all ages and abilities.
Considerations like wheelchair accessibility, community gathering areas, and
multigenerational involvement help to create a more inclusive environment. Collaboration
among local governments, non-profit organisations, corporations, and community groups is
critical. Joint efforts can capitalise on different knowledge and resources, improving the overall
success of urban farming initiatives.Implement policies and programmes that expressly address
socioeconomic inequities in the neighbourhood, such as initiatives to support low-income
households, ensuring that they can actively engage and benefit from urban farming. Continuous
interaction entails maintaining continuing contact and interaction with the community
throughout the development, execution, and evaluation of urban farming projects. Regular
updates and feedback methods keep the community informed and engaged. Adopt an adaptable
management strategy that allows for flexibility in responding to community comments and
changing demands. Regularly evaluate the effects of urban farming efforts and change
strategies to meet changing obstacles and possibilities. Inclusive planning and governance lay
the groundwork for sustainable and community-driven urban farming efforts, which contribute
to long-term food security by ensuring that the benefits of such projects are distributed equally
among all community members.

Policy Implications
With the significant development in urban agriculture, urban agriculture needs to be supported
on a policy level. To ensure the growth and promotion of urban agricultural projects, additional
government-supported institutions and organisations must be developed. Incentives for urban
farming programmes and integration into urban planning policies are two ways the government
can get involved. This is especially vital to prevent the unchecked development of urban
agriculture throughout a city, which could result in an imbalance in the urban infrastructure
and propagation of urban horticulture in undesirable locations. Urban agriculture, particularly
in developing nations, would benefit from more government assistance and promotion due to
its good influence on jobs and livelihoods. Although it is frequently accepted, it is not widely
advocated in many countries. This, however, appears to be evolving slowly. Community
gardens may be funded by non-governmental organizations or municipalities, as well as by
private sponsors or individual donations. However, agricultural growing restrictions have not
altered, and it is still strictly outlawed. The current approach, however, is to ignore the action.
The reason people tolerate it is most likely due to the size of the occurrence. Crops were
produced to primarily produce vegetables for consumption and sell the surplus. The majority
of project farmers expressed satisfaction with the project's influence on their food status. The
project does, however, include other income-generating activities as well as a shelter
renovation project. Although some people were less enthusiastic about the urban agriculture
initiative, it demonstrated that there is potential for coordinating farmers and securing land for

21
long-term use in agriculture. Urban food policy originated as a technique for promoting urban
food security in developed countries. Food policies strive to balance the efficiency of allocating
sufficient food production with the problems of environmental and social sustainability. In
terms of research and development, advances in agricultural technology and collaboration
between urban farmers and academia are anticipated.

Future Prospects
Implementing urban horticulture in future cities could lead to increased food security. To
achieve global food security, attention must be paid to both rural and urban agriculture. Urban
horticulture alone cannot provide global food security. However, large-scale urban food
production may alleviate some of the pressure on rural agriculture. Urban horticulture could
assist in achieving a balance in food availability between rural and urban areas as well.
However, even with highly developed urban horticulture around the world, rural agriculture
will continue to play an important role in global food security. Horticultural production
continues to face challenges such as water availability and low soil quality, the desire to
maximise yields, and reducing environmental impact. New cropping technologies have been
developed to meet these concerns and improve horticulture's sustainability. These cultivation
systems are highly intense and are typically found in metropolitan settings with limited
cultivation space. Automation and AI in urban agriculture, as well as smart cities and precision
farming, are driving technological innovation which plays significant roles in enhancing urban
agriculture for improved food security, AI and automation allow for precise monitoring and
control of resources like water, fertilisers, and energy. This efficiency encourages sustainable
practices and minimises resource waste in urban farming. Data-driven decision-making refers
to how smart agricultural systems use data analytics to make informed judgements. AI systems
use sensor data, weather forecasts, and historical patterns to optimise planting, irrigation, and
harvesting schedules, resulting in higher crop output. Drones, sensors, and AI-powered
cameras can be used to monitor crop health, detect illnesses, and analyse overall plant
conditions. This enables early intervention and enhanced pest management, resulting in higher-
quality food. AI-driven devices can analyse soil moisture levels and meteorological conditions
in real-time, allowing for more precise watering. This not only conserves water but also
guarantees that crops have the right quantity of moisture to flourish. This is precise irrigation.
AI can help optimise vertical farming settings by managing light intensity, temperature, and
humidity. Automation systems manipulate these elements to provide an optimum environment
for plant growth, especially in limited metropolitan areas. AI makes supply chain management
more effective by forecasting demand, optimising logistics, and decreasing food waste. Smart
cities can leverage data analytics to streamline the flow of produce from urban farms to
customers, hence increasing total food distribution. Agriculture automation refers to the
employment of self-contained equipment for operations such as planting, weeding, and
harvesting crops. This lowers the need for human labour, improves efficiency, and enables
urban farmers to concentrate on strategic planning and management. Smart cities use
technology to improve urban living, including agriculture. This entails utilising data, sensors,

22
and automation to develop sustainable and interconnected systems that support food production
within city bounds. AI algorithms use historical and real-time data to predict insect outbreaks.
This proactive method enables farmers to deploy targeted pest management strategies,
lowering their reliance on chemicals while minimising environmental damage. AI-powered
apps can provide personalised recommendations for urban farmers, including advice on crop
selection, planting schedules, and maintenance duties depending on specific urban conditions.
"Soilless culture" is described as the cultivation of plants in systems without soil "in situ." In
recent years, a plethora of novel growth techniques mats, utilizing bags, and containers, as well
as fertilizer solutions, have been created. Those cultivation methods include both systems
without a solid media and aggregate systems that use inorganic or organic substrates. An
organogenic system, also known as "organopónicos" in Spanish, refers to raised beds with a
combination of organic matter and soil that are commonly used for cultivation. This cultivation
strategy is most common in which soil fertility is low and chemical input is lacking. The
development of light-emitting diode (LED) lamps enables the utilization of plant-related
radiant energy through the optimization of plant management procedures. This is critical for
product quality, plant growth, and development. LED lamps provide various advantages over
traditional horticultural lighting, including their small size, increased durability, and minimal
heat emission even at high light intensity levels. Another major promise is global collaboration,
which involves sharing successful ideas to address food security as a global issue. Global
collaboration is viewed as a promising future for urban farming since it enables the global
exchange of knowledge, resources, and innovations. Collaborative activities help to establish
sustainable urban agricultural techniques, increase information exchange, and address shared
difficulties, all of which contribute to urban agriculture's global expansion and resilience.

Conclusion
It can be stated that urban farming has a substantial impact on food security. Urban farming
can be viewed as a method for promoting food security since it fits the requirements and
elements of food security, which include availability, accessibility, stability, and utilization.
Urban gardening benefits the urban community. Urban farming has a tremendous impact on
the social, environmental, and economic well-being of city people, resulting in increased food
security in the area. However, it should be noted that urban farming isn't a panacea for
addressing food security issues, although it can be one of the most effective alternatives. Urban
farming can be commercialised on a larger scale and become a viable enterprise in the future.
Urban farming can address food security challenges and achieve sustainability goals, making
it a viable commercial option. With the current problems faced by the agriculture industry,
particularly the conventional agriculture sector, which is grappling with climate change and the
growing global population, the agriculture sector must transition to a more competitive and
effective manner of feeding the population. Urban farming has the potential to be
commercialised because it is more sustainable, and efficient in terms of production,
distribution, and natural resource conservation, as well as more environmentally friendly.
Urban farming has the potential to become the world's leading producer of food in the future,

23
thanks to technological advancements in agriculture. More evidence-based research is needed
to expand urban farming's potential to serve communities and improve food security.
Nevertheless, food security is a particularly pressing issue in poorer countries. These countries
typically lack the inputs and equipment required for more sophisticated, technological systems.
To attain significant yields, hydroponic and aquaponic systems, for example, require large
amounts of water, as well as extensive upkeep and understanding. These systems are not ideal
for underdeveloped countries because of the high-quality inputs and high operating costs
required. Vertical farming, a popular indoor farming method, is unsustainable, even in
industrialized countries. Urban horticulture significantly contributes to food and nutrition
security around the world, and its value is expected to expand even more as the world's
population and urbanization increase. The majority of the hazards and limits can be avoided by
properly and cautiously introducing urban horticulture. When discussing urban agriculture,
keep in mind that it should only be viewed as a supplement to rural agriculture. Furthermore,
urban farmers producing on a smaller scale should be viewed as a positive feature contributing
to the sustainability and food security of cities, rather than a source of concern due to lower
productivity levels. Urban horticulture isn't suitable for many areas due to contamination risks.
Instead of prohibiting or regulating urban horticulture, it should be viewed as a challenge to
adapt cultivation to the existing circumstances and take preventive measures for ensuring urban
horticulture is viable and food products are safe. Furthermore, there are existing systems that
conserve a significant amount of energy in greenhouses and use artificial light sources.
Understanding these technical possibilities might result in significant cost savings for future
vertical farms. The rising pollution of our world, combined with expected weather extremes,
may necessitate a greater reliance on controlled environment agriculture. Energy efficiency in
cultivation facilities is an essential and current topic, and vegetable production is likely to
become more sustainable in the next years. Scientists with varying levels of experience will be
required to build highly efficient indoor farms or greenhouses. As a result, it is critical to ensure
that future cities' protected production facilities are both sustainable and adequate for high-
quality, high-yield veggies.

24
References :

1. Eigenbrod, C. and Gruda, N. (2014). Urban vegetables for food security in cities. A
review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(2), pp.483–498.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0273-y.

2. Opitz, I., Berges, R., Piorr, A. and Krikser, T. (2015). Contributing to food security in
urban areas: differences between urban agriculture and peri-urban agriculture in the Global
North. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(2), pp.341–358.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9610-2.

3. Poulsen, M.N., McNab, P.R., Clayton, M.L. and Neff, R.A. (2015). A systematic review of
urban agriculture and food security impacts in low-income countries. Food Policy, 55,
pp.131–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.002.

4. Abu, G.A. and Soom, A. eds., (2016). ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING FOOD
SECURITY IN RURAL AND URBAN FARMING HOUSEHOLDS OF BENUE STATE,
NIGERIA. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC). [online]
doi:https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.231375.

5. Ali, M.S., Zaman, N.B.K. and Othman, N.M.I. (2022). Urban Farming. Proceedings
Science, Ethics & Civilization, [online] 1, pp.42–48. Available at:
https://majmuah.com/journal/index.php/konsep/article/view/148/91.

6. Foeken, D. and Mwangi, A.M. (2000). Increasing food security through urban farming in
Nairobi. erepository.uonbi.ac.ke. [online] Available at:
http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/88818.

7. Unity College. (n.d.). What Is Urban Farming? [online] Available at:

https://unity.edu/careers/what-is-urban-farming/.

8. Module 3: Urban Agriculture types/production systems and short food chains With the
support of the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union. (n.d.). Available at:
https://ruaf.org/assets/2019/11/Module-3-Urban-Agriculture-types-production-systems-and-
short-food-chains.pdf [Accessed 20 Jan. 2024].

9. Kalantari, F., Nochian, A., DARKHANI, F. and ASIF, N., 2020. The significance of the
vertical farming concept in ensuring food security for high-density urban areas. Jurnal
Kejuruteraan, 32(1), pp.105-111.

25
10. Firmansyah, A., 2019. Community adaptation on ecological changes through urban
farming innovation for family food security. In Rural Socio-Economic Transformation:
Agrarian, Ecology, Communication and Community, Development Perspectives (pp. 27-34).

11. Siegner, A., Sowerwine, J. and Acey, C., 2018. Does urban agriculture improve food
security? Examining the nexus of food access and distribution of urban produced foods in the
United States: A systematic review. Sustainability, 10(9), p.2988.

12. Siegner, A., Sowerwine, J. and Acey, C., 2018. Does urban agriculture improve food
security? Examining the nexus of food access and distribution of urban produced foods in the
United States: A systematic review. Sustainability, 10(9), p.2988.

Reference Questions

1. Mention the urban farming categories and discuss how their contribution to food
security
2. Discuss what are the challenges of urban farming for food security and give
suggestions on how to overcome the mentioned challenges

26
 Department of Food Science & Technology
Faculty of Applied Sciences
University of Sri Jayewardenepura

B.Sc. (Special) Degree Programme in Food Science & Technology

Year III - Semester II

FST 368 2.0 Emerging Food Technologies and Bio Technology

Lecturer
Senior Prof. K.K.D.S. Ranaweera

Zero Waste Kitchen Appliances

Jayathilake J.A.O.A
AS2020725

1
Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Zero waste kitchen appliances ...................................................................................................................... 4
1. FOOD-SAVING DEHYDRATORS .............................................................................................................. 4
2. ZERO WASTE HOMEMADE FOOD WITH A HIGH-POWERED BLENDER ................................................ 4
3. LOW-TECH COFFEE MAKERS FOR SINGLE USE FREE COFFEE ................................................................ 5
4. MORE ECO HOME COOKING WITH A MULTICOOKER ........................................................................... 5
5. FIGHT FOOD WASTE WITH FERMENTATION CROCKS & KITS ............................................................... 5
6. PLASTIC FREE WATER WITH A SPARKLING WATER MAKER .................................................................. 6
7. LESS TRASHY TAKEOUT & MORE ENJOYABLE LEFTOVERS WITH AN AIR FRYER ................................... 6
8. MAKE EASY UNPACKAGED HOMEMADE BREAD IN A BREAD MAKER .................................................. 6
9. BYO LUNCH IN A REUSABLE CONTAINE, SANDWICH PRESS/JAFFLE MAKER ........................................ 6
10. SAVE ENERGY WITH A RETENTION OVEN OR THERMAL COOKER/BAG.............................................. 6
11. PLASTIC-FREE PASTA WITH A PASTA MAKER ...................................................................................... 7
12. NO FOOD TO LANDFILL WITH A WORM FARM, BOKASHI, COMPOST BIN & CHICKENS! ................... 7
Benefits of using zero waste kitchen appliances .......................................................................................... 7
1. It is cost-effective. ................................................................................................................................. 7
2. It produces less plastic waste and pollution. ........................................................................................ 8
3. It also reduces food waste. ................................................................................................................... 8
4. It promotes a healthier lifestyle. ........................................................................................................... 8
5. It reduces our interactions with toxic chemicals. ................................................................................. 9
6. It promotes a circular economy. ........................................................................................................... 9
7. It reduces global warming. .................................................................................................................... 9
8. It requires self-discipline. .................................................................................................................... 10
Disadvantages of Zero-waste Living............................................................................................................ 10
1. It can be stressful and overwhelming for large families and businesses. ........................................... 10
2. It can get expensive. ........................................................................................................................... 10
3. It is time-consuming............................................................................................................................ 10
4. Some products do not have a zero-waste alternative. ....................................................................... 11
5. There are limited zero-waste stores. .................................................................................................. 11
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 11

2
Introduction
In an era where environmental consciousness has become a paramount concern,
individuals and households are increasingly seeking ways to reduce their ecological footprint.
One significant avenue for making a positive impact on the environment lies within the heart of
every home the kitchen. As our awareness of climate change and resource depletion grows, the
demand for sustainable alternatives has given rise to a revolutionary concept: zero waste kitchen
appliances.
The modern kitchen has evolved beyond its traditional role as a mere space for meal
preparation. It has become a focal point for eco-conscious consumers aiming to align their
lifestyle choices with a commitment to sustainability. In this pursuit, zero waste kitchen
appliances have emerged as the vanguard, redefining the way we approach food preparation,
storage, and waste management.
At the core of the zero waste kitchen movement is the philosophy of reducing, reusing,
and recycling. Traditional kitchen appliances often contribute to excessive waste generation,
from single-use plastic packaging to energy-intensive processes. In contrast, zero waste kitchen
appliances are designed to minimize environmental impact at every stage of their lifecycle.
One key aspect of the zero waste kitchen is the emphasis on sustainable materials in
appliance construction. Manufacturers are increasingly turning to eco-friendly materials such as
bamboo, stainless steel, and recycled plastics to create products that are not only durable but also
contribute to a circular economy. By choosing appliances made from these materials, consumers
can actively participate in the reduction of deforestation, energy consumption, and landfill waste.
Furthermore, zero waste kitchen appliances are engineered to optimize energy efficiency.
From energy-saving refrigerators to eco-friendly dishwashers, these appliances are designed to
consume less electricity while maintaining high performance standards. This not only results in
lower utility bills for consumers but also aligns with global efforts to mitigate climate change by
reducing carbon emissions.
Waste reduction is a central tenet of the zero waste kitchen movement, and these
appliances play a crucial role in minimizing both food and packaging waste. Smart refrigerators
equipped with advanced freshness-preserving technologies help extend the shelf life of
perishable goods, reducing the frequency of food spoilage and subsequent waste. Additionally,
zero waste appliances often incorporate innovative features such as reusable food storage
containers, eliminating the need for disposable alternatives and encouraging a shift towards a
more sustainable lifestyle.
Composting has also found its way into the heart of the zero waste kitchen. Compost-friendly
appliances, such as food waste disposers and compost bins integrated into sink systems, facilitate the
recycling of organic kitchen waste. This not only diverts organic matter from landfills but also provides
homeowners with nutrient-rich compost that can be used to enrich soil and support sustainable
gardening practices.

3
Zero waste kitchen appliances
Kitchen tools can help reduce waste in many ways. Ex; from enabling to
make homemade DIY versions of foods or drinks previously bought
plastic wrapped to allowing to save produce and foods from going to
waste.

Always try to seek these out second hand first before buying new. It is
also a good idea to borrow one to try out - either from family or a friend
or a kitchen library to see if it’ll fit in with our lifestyle and we’ll
actually use it so it doesn’t end up just languishing at the back of kitchen
cupboard.

In here discuss the kitchen appliance which are helped to reduce plastic
and kitchen waste.

1. FOOD-SAVING DEHYDRATORS

Having a dehydrator saves food waste, as well as money, and enables the preserving and
storing of food to eat slowly over the months. Make our own dried fruit, fruit roll ups and fruit
leather.

For zero waste work lunches, can dehydrate food items and place them in a reused glass jar to
make own instant soup or noodles and other just-add-hot-water style lunches. And also easily
dry seeds like pumpkin, rings of citrus to use as cocktail garnishes, foraged seaweed a nd herbs
and flowers to make own teas. Dehydrators can also be used to make yoghurt, ricotta salata, a
dry, salted ricotta, shanklish cheese, vegetable chips, fruit chips, and crackers.

2. ZERO WASTE HOMEMADE FOOD WITH A HIGH-POWERED BLENDER

A good blender makes making spreads like nut butters, liquids like nut milks and soups, dips
like hummus, sauces like tahini sauce, butters like coconut butter, raw baking mixtures like
lemon cheesecake slice topping much faster and easier to make, and the result is much
smoother and more enjoyable edibles and drinkables.

Faster, easier and more enjoyable edibles and drinkables means zero packaging homemade is
more likely to happen instead of reverting to packaged store-bought goods.

4
3. LOW-TECH COFFEE MAKERS FOR SINGLE USE FREE COFFEE

While we can get a beautiful big expensive high-tech coffee machine, there are loads of
inexpensive low-tech solutions to sipping smooth and steamy homemade coffee without any
single use.

If you already have a coffee machine that takes coffee capsules, you can quickly turn this in to
a zero waste coffee machine by getting a reusable coffee capsule

4. MORE ECO HOME COOKING WITH A MULTICOOKER

A multicooker or Instapot speeds up making homemade stock and cooking dried chickpeas
and beans exponentially, making it more convenient and saving energy use.

Mutlicookers can be used to make tomato sauce, barbecue sauce, and pasta sauce in bulk,
enabling to make own at home to avoid the packaging of store-bought sauces, which can often
be plastic bottles, and to use up tomatoes past their prime that would otherwise go to waste.

They make home cooking a breeze and are perfect for batch cooking meals, meaning more
cooking at home and less takeaways, which means less single use takeaway packaging, less
money spent and less food wasted.

5. FIGHT FOOD WASTE WITH FERMENTATION CROCKS & KITS

Like dehydrating, fermenting preserves food for eating at a later stage, allowing excess food
to be saved and stored, and filling up kitchen cupboards with free ferments. Eating fermented
foods is also great for gut health and making your own is a great way to ensure we’re getting
in healthy bacteria.

Preserve fruit, make jams and jellies, make sauerkraut, kimchi, and pickles, brew kombucha,
ferment all sorts of veggies and place in sterilised reused jars. We can also make cordials,
milk kefir, and sauces.

Fermentation crocks make fermenting large amounts easy and convenient, and they are
specially designed to provide a specialised, anaerobic environment that allows fermentation to
take place without the risk of mould developing or having to continually be checked.

5
6. PLASTIC FREE WATER WITH A SPARKLING WATER MAKER

If fizzy drinks are a must-have in home, we can get a fizzy drink maker and carbonate our
own in refillable reusable bottles instead of buying them in plastic bottles at the shops.

7. LESS TRASHY TAKEOUT & MORE ENJOYABLE LEFTOVERS WITH AN AIR

FRYER

If a family likes fried food, making this food yourself at home instead of getting takeaways
together with all the trash that comes with it is healthier and low waste. If you’re frying at
home already, save oil and have less used oil to dispose, and it is quicker and easier than deep
frying.

Also, air fryers are great for reheating leftovers in a way that restores the meal’s heat,
firmness, and crispiness. Eating and enjoying. leftovers saves food waste and is also a
money-saver.

8. MAKE EASY UNPACKAGED HOMEMADE BREAD IN A BREAD MAKER

You don’t need a bread maker to make bread, but it does make it easier and if homemade
bread is something that we want and/or the only way is to get plastic-free bread and making
bread from scratch in oven or sourdough is not sustainable in the long run and/or just not
going to happen .

9. BYO LUNCH IN A REUSABLE CONTAINE, SANDWICH PRESS/JAFFLE MAKER

It can be used to make a quick easy lunch with just about anything in the fridge, so we won’t
have to rush out starving to find something to eat and prevent food wastage.

10. SAVE ENERGY WITH A RETENTION OVEN OR THERMAL COOKER/BAG

Thermal cookers, retention ovens and thermal cooking bags help reduce wastage and use of
energy when cooking as you only need to cook meals using electricity or gas for a short
amount of time and can then keep it cooking in the thermal cooker, retention oven, or ther mal
cooking bag.

Heat-retention allows food that has been brought to the boil to continue slow cooking for
hours. We can simply put the pot with its lid into a stainless steel vacuum insulated thermal
cooker like the Thermos Thermal Cooker or a slow cooker bag in which it will continue
slow cooking for up to 8 hours while in the bag. According to EasyOven cooking this way
saves up to 83-90% of fuel, making it a more eco-friendly, health-friendly (less fumes), and
cost-friendly way to cook.

6
11. PLASTIC-FREE PASTA WITH A PASTA MAKER

Making your own pasta at home saves having to buy it in packaging if our local bulk food
store doesn’t stock pasta and it saves the resources used to get it to both the bulk food store
and the supermarket. It also produces delicious pasta!

12. NO FOOD TO LANDFILL WITH A WORM FARM, BOKASHI, COMPOST BIN &
CHICKENS!

Technically not kitchen appliances, but definitely some things that can reduce the food waste
from the kitchen going to landfill or being picked up by the council for commercial
composting immensely.

Use a counter compost caddy or a bucket in the fridge to collect food scraps for composting in
a compost bin, feeding chickens or worms in a worm farm .

Benefits of using zero waste kitchen appliances

Zero-waste refers to designing products and living situations to produce as minimal waste as
possible. Zero-waste principles are refuse, reduce, reuse, and recycle. These principles help us
work towards protecting nature and its inhabitants.

Zero-waste living has many benefits for us and our environment. Some of these benefits are:

1. It is cost-effective.

Practicing a zero-waste lifestyle is cost-effective as it encourages to purchase only necessities.

Also, the long-term goal of zero-waste is to reduce and reuse the items in household.

For example, it encourages to reuse the Tupperware, glass, or tin containers in house you already
have rather than using single-use plastic food containers like bags and wraps. If you can’t reuse
what you have, swapping these for reusable alternatives to Ziploc bags and reusable food
containers saves money in the long run and helps reduce waste.

In a case where a zero-waste item is more expensive than an inorganic item, consider the
product’s lifecycle. It is an effective cost determiner that’ll help to save money. In most cases,
the expensive zero-waste product lasts longer than the inexpensive, unsustainable product. Also,
DIYs, thrifting, and bulk shopping will help you save a lot more money.

7
2. It produces less plastic waste and pollution.
An essential goal of the zero-waste movement is to reduce the waste we send to landfills,
especially plastic waste. Disposable plastic is prevalent in our environment. Manufacturers use
wasteful packaging materials for products, wrapping drinks, food, fruits, games, bags, plates, and
other products in plastics. Supermarkets also give out a lot of plastic bags when we shop. All
these contribute to plastic pollution in our environment.

Statistics show that United Kingdom residents trash up to 66 plastic packaging items in a week3,
100 billion plastic packaging items in a year, and only recycle 12% of plastic waste.

The plastic waste that is not recycled ends up incinerated or in various landfills. As plastic takes
hundreds of years to decompose, it breaks down into micro plastics and leeches harmful
chemicals into the environment. These microplastics end up in the food chain and marine and
terrestrial environments. Scientists even found these microplastics in humans and animals

The zero-waste movement encourages you first to refuse and reduce plastic items like bags and
bottles. However, it is practically impossible to avoid plastics daily, and should always opt for
plastic-free alternatives when possible. Recycling is the next best option when you end up with
plastic.

The more sustainable alternatives can choose include products manufactured with organic
materials that decompose. These include wood, bamboo, glass, stainless steel, hemp, cotton, and
various plant fibers.

3. It also reduces food waste.

Food waste statistics show that the United Kingdom had about 9.5 million tonnes of wasted food
in 2018. The United Nations gave an estimate of the wasted food that goes into landfill
worldwide. It was over 930 million tonnes in 2019. The food waste problem is global, with an
estimated one-third of global food production wasted. Luckily, zero-waste can help us reduce the
waste generated in households and commercially - and reduce the impact on our waste
management systems.

4. It promotes a healthier lifestyle.

People will maintain a healthy lifestyle when they join the zero-waste movement. A waste-free
lifestyle doesn't protect the environment alone. It also promotes activities like recycling, regular
exercise, yoga, zero-waste cooking, sustainable shopping, and proper waste disposal that protect
human health from chemicals and toxic behaviors.
With zero waste, can create better-eating habits. Curating the best eating and living habits will
put physical and mental well-being in its best state. For instance, yoga can help to stay fit and

8
sharpen mind. Also, clearing unnecessary clutter from space will give more breathing space.
People will begin to purchase useful zero-waste products that positively impact in daily life.
5. It reduces our interactions with toxic chemicals.

Zero-waste living advocates for minimal interaction with harmful chemicals. It doesn't promote
fast foods that cause harm to our well-being.Also, it doesn't promote fast fashion because it
produces lots of greenhouse gas emissions and uses synthetic dyes like acid, reactive, and
disperse. Manufacturers wash these chemical substances into water bodies, causing water
pollution, and they end up contaminating our environment. Zero-waste schemes provide safe
alternatives that don’t harm humans and the environment. For instance, plastic-free products
protect us from chemicals like phthalates, bisphenols, and fluorinated compounds in plastic bags
and plates.

6. It promotes a circular economy.

Zero-waste initiatives positively impact the economy by promoting a circular economy. This
economy focuses on waste reduction, maximizing natural resources by renewing and reusing
them in an endless loop. It differs from linear economies that extract raw materials and use and
dispose of them.

When we go zero-waste, we take a new economic approach where everything has value, and
nothing goes to waste. The aim is to use natural materials until you get maximum value from
them, ultimately living waste free.

7. It reduces global warming.

Zero-waste minimizes the harmful human activities that contribute to the depletion of the ozone
layer. Practicing zero-waste production reduces our carbon footprint. Zero-waste production is
the implementation of sustainable manufacturing practices. Here, manufacturers consider how
they create waste from the processing of raw materials to the production to its packaging after
consumers use it2.

Zero-waste production is possible with gradual implementations, like changing product

packaging, using raw materials that don’t produce a lot of waste, and creating ways to reuse
waste products. Our current production of goods and services burns a lot of fossil fuels and
produces high amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. These gas emissions enter our atmosphere
and destroy it, leading to climate change.

9
8. It requires self-discipline.

Disadvantages of Zero-waste Living

Although the positive aspects of sustainable living, there are some negative aspects of living
zero-waste. They are:

1. It can be stressful and overwhelming for large families and businesses.

People new to living zero-waste might find it stressful to maintain, especially for large
households. People can develop eco-anxiety, anxiety about what you need to do to live a
sustainable life. It might disrupt our daily activities and stress out before develop a suitable
routine.

The best thing to do is gradually introduce zero-waste methods into household. For instance, you
need to teach kids recycling practices and make sure they don’t dump recyclable trash into the
trash bin that goes into landfills. Also, your habits of purchasing single-use snack bags and juice
boxes will have to end. They should buy bulk and repackage reusable Ziploc bags and eco-
friendly lunch boxes.

2. It can get expensive.

Many people make the mistake of buying a bunch of zero-waste alternatives at the start of their
zero-waste lifestyle. They should reuse what they already have at home for as long as possible.
That is the best way to approach the transition. For more info on starting out without less cost,
check out our guide to going zero waste on a budget.

3. It is time-consuming.

Another problem with zero-waste living is the time it consumes for some. People should set
ample time periodically for planning and executing shopping activities if they need to research
and source bulk and low-waste items. For example, going further out of your way to buy food
items in bulk rather than shopping at the local supermarket where they wrap the packaged goods
in wasteful materials.

If we want to DIY many daily-use items, that can also prove time-consuming. For example,
sewing reusable grocery bags, sewing or knitting utensil holders, reusable cloth covers, etc.

10
 4. Some products do not have a zero-waste alternative.

Sadly, people can’t change some items to a better alternative because some products do not have
sustainable options. For example,we can’t avoid plastics in technological and electrical
appliances, which end up creating e-waste, and our discarded technology impacts the
environment. Just have to repair and reuse them instead of trashing them at the slightest damage.

Beware of greenwashing. Many products claim to be eco-friendly, but they are not. Some
manufacturers work to pass the deception that their products are eco-friendly. People need to be
aware of these greenwashing tactics.

5. There are limited zero-waste stores.

Zero-waste stores are less popular than we need them to be. So, finding sustainable zero-waste
shops in your vicinity may take time. Sustainable online shopping can be unreliable because
some stores use plastic to pack their products. Also, you have to be careful of some companies’
greenwashing tactics.

Some greenwashing tactics are:

 Claims of eco-friendly products and services without proof.

 Suspicious or fake environmental certifications.
 Vague description of ingredients and manufacturing process.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the advent of zero waste kitchen appliances represents a transformative leap
towards a more sustainable and environmentally conscious lifestyle. By integrating these eco-
friendly solutions into our daily routines, we not only contribute to the preservation of our planet
but also inspire a broader shift towards sustainable practices. As the zero waste kitchen
movement gains momentum, it is evident that the choices we make in our kitchens today have
the power to shape a greener, cleaner, and more sustainable future for generations to come.

Reference Questions
01.What is meant by zero waste kitchen appliances?
02.List 5 zero waste kitchen appliances and disuss .
03.What are the advantages and disadvantages of using zero waste kitchen
appliances ?

11
 Department of Food Science & Technology

Faculty of Applied Sciences

University of Sri Jayewardenepura

B.Sc. (Special) Degree Programme in Food Science & Technology Year

III - Semester II

FST 368 2.0 Emerging Food Technologies and Biotechnology Lecturer

Senior Prof. K.K.D.S. Ranaweera

Sports nutrition for endurance athletes

Lakshan M.D.

AS2020726
Table of Contents
Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1

Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2

Macronutrients and Micronutrients............................................................................................ 3

Carbohydrates ........................................................................................................................ 3

Fat .......................................................................................................................................... 3

Protein .................................................................................................................................... 4

Vitamins and minerals............................................................................................................ 5

Hydration and electrolytes ......................................................................................................... 6

Periodized Nutrition ................................................................................................................... 7

Pre-workout............................................................................................................................ 7

During-workout...................................................................................................................... 7

Post-workout .......................................................................................................................... 7

Supplements for endurance athletes........................................................................................... 8

Low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets ........................................................................................... 8

Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) ................................................................................ 10

Pharmacological sports ergogenics ...................................................................................... 11

Summary

Endurance pertains to the capacity of skeletal muscles to sustain continuous activity despite
the challenges posed by exercise. Endurance exercises encompass three stages: pre-, during-,
and post-workout phases. The nutritional needs associated with these phases vary based on
factors such as exercise intensity, workout type, individual body composition, training regimen,
and environmental conditions. Typically, the pre-workout phase necessitates glycogen
synthesis and the preservation of spare glycogen reserves. During the workout phase, there is
a demand for swift absorption of external glucose, insulin secretion to facilitate glucose
transport into muscle cells, replenishment of lost electrolytes, promotion of fluid retention, etc.
Conversely, the post-workout phase calls for rapid absorption of amino acids, facilitation of
muscle protein synthesis, repair of damaged muscle fibers and tendons, mitigation of
inflammation and oxidative stress, and so forth. Hence, it is advisable to incorporate nutritional
sources that can meet these metabolic demands. This review explores various dietary strategies,
including the timing and quantity of nutrient intake, aimed at fulfilling the metabolic
requirements and consequently enhancing athletes' endurance potential.

Key Words: nutrition, dietary interventions, pre-workout, during-workout, post-workout,

metabolic requirements, electrolyte replenishment, endurance, exercise

1
Introduction

Endurance exercise performance is significantly influenced by the body's capacity to

effectively utilize nutrients over prolonged physical activity periods. While environmental
factors like location, temperature, altitude, and humidity impact endurance, nutrition and
hydration are crucial for achieving endurance goals and require careful planning and practice.
Energy deficit is commonly observed in endurance exercise, underscoring the importance of
adequate calorie intake before, during, and after training sessions. Insufficient calorie
consumption can detrimentally affect performance, leading to fatigue, pain, and exertion, and
compromise recovery rates, potentially resulting in reduced training capacity, overtraining, and
illness.

Metabolic requirements vary across the phases of endurance exercise at the cellular level. The
pre-workout stage necessitates glycogen synthesis, spare glycogen breakdown, enhanced
vasodilation for improved blood supply to tissues, gluconeogenesis promotion from the liver,
and protection against insulin-induced hypoglycemia. During the workout phase, insulin
release facilitates glucose transport into muscle cells, stimulates lipolysis for energy, promotes
calcium release for muscular contraction, ensures rapid glucose absorption, electrolyte
replenishment, fluid retention, and safeguards against tissue inflammation and oxidative stress.
Post-workout, quick amino acid absorption, muscle protein synthesis, repair of damaged
muscle fibers and tendons, glycogen replenishment, tissue inflammation and oxidative stress
reduction, and muscle and tendon fiber recovery are critical. Therefore, diets that meet these
metabolic and nutritional demands of strained tissues are recommended.

Additionally, non-nutritional factors such as gastrointestinal challenges (nausea, vomiting,

bloating, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, flatulence, and belching), injuries (blisters, subungual
hematomas, chafing, abrasions, plantar fasciitis), and environmental factors (sunburn,
frostbite) influence endurance goals. Strategies like training in high altitudes, high-intensity
exercise, stretching, exercising in higher temperatures, cross-training, etc., are relevant. Both
nutrition and non-nutritional factors should be considered essential for achieving endurance
goals. This review emphasizes nutritional interventions tailored to enhance endurance
performance in athletes.

2
Macronutrients and Micronutrients

Carbohydrates

Although carbohydrates (CHOs), proteins, and fats can all serve as sources of energy during
exercise, their utilization depends on factors such as exercise intensity, duration, type, and fuel
availability. For marathon runners sustaining a standard pace requiring 80–90% of maximum
oxygen consumption (VO2 max), CHOs become the primary fuel source, contributing up to
90% of the expended energy. Conversely, during low-intensity endurance activities like
walking, fat becomes the predominant fuel source, supplying over 50% of the energy needs.
When CHO availability decreases, the body shifts to utilizing fats, followed by protein as an
energy source. Research indicates a correlation between CHO intake and improved race times
in ultra-marathon events.

Hence, it is crucial to prioritize maximizing CHO availability to working muscles and

emphasize the importance of adequate energy for optimal performance. Gradually increasing
CHO consumption ensures the replenishment and optimization of muscle glycogen stores.

Additionally, increasing fluid storage is facilitated. The suggested carbohydrate (CHO) intake
during marathon training varies, ranging from 5 to 7 g/kg/day in regular diets and escalating to
7–10 g/kg/day in the 3–4 days leading up to competition, with a peak of 10–12 g/kg/day in the
48 hours preceding the race. Consuming CHO at a rate of 1–1.5 g/kg every 2 hours for the
initial 6 hours not only replenishes depleting glycogen stores during exercise but also aids in
the accelerated recovery of muscle tissues when consumed within 30 minutes following
training. To attain the appropriate CHO balance or mitigate energy deficits during exercise,
endurance athletes are advised to ingest approximately 500–600 g/day, which is double the
standard recommended CHO intake, to uphold muscle glycogen levels. Examples of CHO-rich
foods include white rice, cereals, granola bars, bagels, white bread, gels, fluids, and beans.

Fat

Since endurance training primarily relies on aerobic metabolism, fat serves as a significant
energy source through oxidation. While some studies suggest that consuming fat helps
conserve carbohydrate (CHO) stores, its impact on enhancing endurance performance remains
somewhat unclear. Several studies indicate that following a high-fat, low-carb diet for a period
of 2 to 3 weeks allows muscles to adapt to utilizing fat as a primary energy source, thus
conserving more CHOs, particularly in moderate-intensity and marathon runners who rely on
3
fat as their primary fuel source. This approach offers potential benefits, such as not needing to
carry CHO sources during endurance events, avoiding concerns about obtaining sufficient
CHOs, and reducing the risk of gastrointestinal discomfort. Moreover, it aids in replenishing
intramuscular triglycerides. However, relying on fats limits exercise intensity and performance
in activities that heavily rely on glycolysis for energy production.

Moreover, heightened levels of ketone bodies in the blood negatively affect performance.
Furthermore, inadequate CHO intake among non-fat adapted marathoners can lead to reduced
CHO availability, promoting muscle protein breakdown and potentially resulting in long-term
loss of skeletal muscle mass. However, fat consumption is recommended for runners
experiencing gastrointestinal discomfort after consuming CHOs. Supplementing with fat
sources to address energy deficits can enhance performance. Despite this, consuming a fat-rich
diet does not appear to enhance endurance performance compared to CHO-rich meals. This
may explain why food supplements available in the market typically do not contain fats.
Common sources of healthy fats include unprocessed vegetable oils (such as olive oil and
sunflower oil), omega-rich seeds (such as pumpkin, sunflower, and sesame seeds), flaxseed oil,
fish oil, and nuts (such as almonds and walnuts).

Protein

Endurance exercises are influenced by the synthesis of new proteins and the repair of damaged
muscle fibers, which also serve as a source of energy substrate during activity. Consequently,
the protein demand for developing endurance far exceeds that required by the general
population for maintenance. Research indicates that natural proteins in the body contribute up
to 10% of the total energy expended during endurance exercises, with the fraction of
contribution influenced by factors like duration, intensity, and the level of glycogen/glucose
availability. Utilizing amino acids as a fuel source, along with muscle damage associated with
training and low intake of external protein sources, can lead to a decrease in skeletal muscle
mass over time in endurance training. However, external supplementation with sufficient
proteins tends to maintain skeletal mass stability.

To prevent muscle mass loss during endurance training, it's crucial to ensure adequate glycogen
stores in the muscle, coupled with external supplies of carbohydrates (CHO), fats, and proteins
during activity. Recommended protein intake for the general athletic population ranges from
1.2 to 2.0 g/kg. However, for endurance training, the recommended intake is a minimum of 20
g at 3–4-hour intervals to maximize required muscle protein synthesis. Consuming up to 20 g

4
of protein within 30–60 minutes post-endurance exercise has been shown to stimulate protein
synthesis, attenuate breakdown, and support rapid recovery from endurance exercise bouts.

Vitamins and minerals

These nutrients are essential for maintaining optimal performance due to their roles in energy
production, hemoglobin synthesis, bone health, immunity, and protection against oxidative
tissue damage. They also contribute to faster recovery post-endurance exercises. Vital vitamins
and minerals for endurance include vitamins D (VD), E, C, B complex, iron, zinc, magnesium,
β-carotene, and selenium.

Calcium and VD are necessary for bone tissue growth, maintenance, repair, and muscle
contraction initiation through nerve conduction. Inadequate calcium and VD increase the risk
of reduced bone mineral density and stress fractures. While calcium is obtained from food, VD
is synthesized from sunlight, making supplementation advisable for individuals with limited
sunlight exposure or indoor training. Athletes are recommended to supplement with 1000–2000
IU/day of VD.

B-complex vitamins, particularly V-B12 and folate, are crucial for tissue building and repair;
their deficiency can lead to anemia and reduced performance. Iron deficiency also results in
anemia, impairing red blood cells' ability to transport oxygen, particularly concerning in
endurance activities due to increased hepcidin production, limiting iron absorption. Ferritin
levels below 50 μg/L may necessitate iron supplementation. Zinc is essential for energy
metabolism, muscle repair, and immune function; however, excessive supplementation should
be avoided (up to 40 mg/day). Zinc-rich foods include shellfish, green leafy vegetables, and
seeds.

Magnesium is vital for neuromuscular system function, and deficiency may cause muscle
cramps. Recommended levels for endurance activities are 310–420 mg/day. These nutrients
play critical roles in supporting endurance performance and should be adequately maintained
through diet and supplementation when necessary.

5
Hydration and electrolytes

Hydration is a critical aspect of endurance training, with even a minor (2%) reduction in body
mass due to dehydration correlating with decreased performance, reduced heat tolerance,
metabolic dysregulation, and heightened cardiovascular strain. Estimating hydration needs for
an event involves assessing body weight loss before and after training, exercise intensity and
duration, and environmental conditions.

During training, reduced diuresis occurs due to increased vasopressin secretion, the
angiotensin-renin-aldosterone mechanisms, and decreased intracellular osmolytes, which
prompt water movement to the extracellular space. Consequently, hyperhydration has become
common during endurance exercises. Research suggests adopting a "drink to thirst" strategy to
maintain hydration status during events. Dehydration leads to fatigue from hyperthermia,
reduced free fatty acid uptake, and overuse of muscle glycogen.

Studies indicate that sodium supplementation beyond dietary intake offers no additional
benefits and may have adverse effects on hydration. Therefore, it's advisable to maintain
hydration by drinking to thirst, avoiding excess sodium supplementation, even in high ambient
temperatures.

To ensure hydration balance, consuming 5–10 ml/kg body weight of a CHO-supplemented

beverage 2–4 hours before exercise allows sufficient time for excess fluid excretion through
urine before the event. This approach supports optimal hydration levels and enhances
endurance performance.

It's been suggested that fluid losses exceeding 2% of body mass (BM) can detrimentally impact
performance. Research indicates that dehydration during endurance exercise heightens the risk
of oxidative stress, consequently affecting performance. Therefore, maintaining hydration is
essential for preserving hydration levels, thermoregulation, and preventing oxidative stress
during endurance activity. As previously mentioned, adopting a "drink to thirst" strategy has
been demonstrated to enhance endurance potential in athletes.

6
Periodized Nutrition

Pre-workout

Research indicates that consuming carbohydrates (CHO) at a rate of 10–12 grams per kilogram
of body mass (BM) daily in the 36–48 hours leading up to exercise can boost endurance
performance by 2%-3% and postpone the onset of fatigue by about 20%. Additionally, studies
suggest that CHO loading 24 hours prior to exercise is effective in enhancing performance.
Intake of CHO in the hours preceding training has been demonstrated to elevate glycogen
reserves, increase CHO oxidation, prolong cycle time until exhaustion, and enhance overall
performance.

During-workout

Several research studies indicate that consuming carbohydrates (CHO) during exercise can
enhance performance by preventing hypoglycemia and ensuring a steady supply of immediate
energy during training through the maintenance of high levels of CHO oxidation. For
endurance exercises lasting over 2–3 hours, such as marathon runs, it is recommended to
consume 60 grams of CHO per hour from either a single source or multiple sources to optimize
performance during the run.

Regarding protein intake, research suggests that ingesting protein alongside CHO during
exercise does not enhance time-trial performance compared to consuming adequate amounts
of CHO alone. Therefore, during endurance activities, it is advisable to focus on CHO intake
alone for optimal results.

Post-workout

Ensuring adequate recovery of carbohydrates (CHOs), protein, fluids, and electrolytes

following endurance activity enhances endurance potential by facilitating the rapid restoration
of body homeostasis. Consumption of CHO-rich foods after endurance exercise has been
demonstrated to expedite glycogen synthesis, with CHO intake being particularly relevant for
glycogen synthesis acceleration when the subsequent training is scheduled within the next 8
hours. It is suggested that CHO intake can range from 1–2 grams per kilogram per hour for the
initial 4 hours, followed by a return to daily CHO requirements.

7
In addition to CHOs, the incorporation of protein has been shown to promote quick recovery
by increasing the mitochondrial protein fraction. Dose-response studies have indicated that 20
grams of high-quality protein is adequate to maximize muscle protein synthesis at rest
following high-intensity aerobic exercise. Muscle protein synthesis peaks 45–90 minutes after
protein consumption at rest and returns to homeostatic levels, even with continued availability
of circulating essential amino acids. This phenomenon is known as the muscle full effect. Since
exercise-induced protein synthesis remains elevated 24–28 hours post-high-intensity aerobic
exercise, protein consumption post-exercise can have an additional beneficial effect. Moreover,
multiple protein intakes throughout the day may optimize muscle growth.

Supplements for endurance athletes

To counteract the detrimental effects of rigorous endurance training and support the body's
adaptation to training, a well-designed diet and supplement strategy that fulfills energy
requirements and incorporates proper timing of essential nutrients is crucial. It's important to
discern between the terms 'supplements' and 'ergogenic aids' when discussing athletes and
nutrition. Although these terms are often used interchangeably, there are subtle distinctions. A
nutritional supplement typically refers to something that complements or adds to something
else. Conversely, in scientific literature, substances used by athletes to enhance performance
are referred to as ergogenic aids or sports ergogenics. The term 'ergogenic' is derived from the
Greek words 'ergon' (work) and 'gennan' (to produce), thus, an ergogenic typically produces or
enhances work. To avoid confusion, this chapter utilizes both terms interchangeably, though
specific classifications of sports ergogenics are mentioned. Numerous supplements are now
available for athletes across various disciplines.

Low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets

The energy demands of training are primarily fulfilled through the oxidation of fat and
carbohydrates. As the intensity of exercise escalates, there is an amplified reliance on
carbohydrates as a fuel source: when exercise intensity corresponds to approximately 50% of
an individual's maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max), roughly two-thirds of the total energy
requirement is met through fat oxidation, while carbohydrate oxidation contributes
approximately one-third. If the exercise intensity escalates to around 75% of VO2 max, the
overall energy expenditure rises, and carbohydrates become the primary fuel source. In

8
situations where carbohydrates are either unavailable or only available in limited quantities,
the intensity of exercise must be decreased to a level where the energy demand can be met
through fat oxidation.

The practical takeaway for coaches and athletes from these studies is that carbohydrate intake
should be adequate to sustain the training load required to elicit a response. During intense
training sessions, there is significant depletion of glycogen stores in the muscles being
exercised and in the liver. Failure to replenish this carbohydrate reserve through the
consumption of high-carbohydrate foods before the next training session necessitates a
reduction in training intensity, resulting in a corresponding decline in the training response.
Athletes who engage in rigorous daily training can easily notice this phenomenon; if they
consume a low-carbohydrate diet primarily consisting of fat and protein after a day's training,
it becomes challenging to replicate the same training load the following day. These
observations have led to the advocacy of high-carbohydrate diets for all athletes undergoing
training.

Feeding a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet over extended periods has been demonstrated to
enhance the muscle's ability to oxidize fat by stimulating mitochondrial biogenesis. While this
can improve endurance capacity in rats, its effectiveness in humans may not be as pronounced.
Similarly, short-term fasting enhances endurance capacity in rats but generally reduces exercise
tolerance in humans.

Therefore, the training diet should typically be high in carbohydrates, with a significant portion
of total energy intake coming from complex carbohydrates and simple sugars. However, there
may be benefits to restricting carbohydrate availability before and during certain training
sessions. Some lengthy training sessions might be best performed in a fasted or carbohydrate-
depleted state to optimize fat oxidation capacity. Nevertheless, athletes should ensure that
carbohydrate stores are replenished for high-intensity training sessions. Thus, a daily
carbohydrate intake of 10 grams per kilogram of body mass or even more might be necessary
for athletes during intensive training periods.

Achieving these high levels of intake can be challenging without consuming substantial
amounts of simple sugars and other concentrated forms of carbohydrates, as well as increasing
the frequency of meals and snacks toward a 'grazing' eating pattern.

Failure to meet carbohydrate needs can render athletes more vulnerable to minor infectious
illnesses. Exercising with low carbohydrate reserves can elevate levels of stress hormones,

9
consequently impairing the functional capacity of the immune system. Although these illnesses
are typically minor, they have the potential to disrupt training schedules and may even hinder
participation in important competitions.

The prospect of heightened fat oxidation during exercise appeals to individuals aiming to
reduce body fat content through a modest exercise regimen. While it's evident that exercising
in a fasted state or while following a carbohydrate-restricted diet can indeed boost fat oxidation,
it typically accompanies an increased subjective perception of effort. As a result, the total
amount of work performed, and thus the impact on energy balance, is likely to be diminished.
Moreover, it remains unclear whether carbohydrate-restricted diets effectively promote weight
loss; most reviews suggest they are not more effective than isoenergetic low-fat diets.

Furthermore, the amplified perceived effort associated with exercising in a carbohydrate-

depleted state is likely to deter adherence to an exercise program.

Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs)

Another popular nutritional ergogenic aid is branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), including
leucine, isoleucine, and valine. These compounds are commonly found in protein/meal
replacement powders and energy drinks. Table 3 provides the typical amino acid composition
of some common protein preparations. The Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for
BCAAs is less than 3 grams per day, although supplementation studies often utilize 5 to 20
grams per day in tablet form and 1 to 7 grams per liter in solutions.

The rationale behind BCAA supplements is linked to the concept of central fatigue, which
posits that mental fatigue in the brain can negatively impact physical performance during
endurance events. According to the central fatigue hypothesis, low blood levels of BCAAs may
expedite the production of the brain neurotransmitter serotonin, or 5-hydroxytryptamine, and
prematurely induce fatigue. Tryptophan, an amino acid circulating in the blood, serves as a
precursor of serotonin and can be readily transported into the brain to elevate serotonin levels
when BCAA levels in the blood are low. This occurs because high blood levels of BCAAs can
hinder tryptophan transport into the brain.

During endurance exercise, as muscle and liver glycogen are depleted for energy, blood levels
of BCAAs decrease while fatty acid levels increase to serve as an additional energy source.
The challenge with excess fatty acids in the blood is that they require attachment to albumin as
a carrier protein for proper transport. In doing so, fatty acids displace tryptophan from its

10
position on albumin, facilitating the transport of tryptophan into the brain for conversion to
serotonin. Consequently, the combination of reduced BCAAs and elevated fatty acids in the
blood leads to increased tryptophan entry into the brain and enhanced serotonin production,
ultimately resulting in central fatigue.

Amino acid Amino acid composition of whey

Alanine 4.6
Arginine 2.3
Aspartic acid 9.6
Cysteine/cystine 2.8
Glutamic acid 15.0
Glycine 1.5
Histidine 1.6
Isoleucine 4.5
Leucine 11.6
Lysine 9.1
Methionine 2.2
Phenylalanine 3.1
Proline 4.4
Serine 3.3
Threonine 4.3
Tryptophan 2.3
Tyrosine 3.3
Valine 4.5
Table 1: Amino acid composition of whey protein

Pharmacological sports ergogenics

Pharmacological sports ergogenics are substances designed to mimic the function of hormones
or neurotransmitters naturally present in the human body. Like certain nutritional sports
ergogenics, pharmacological sports ergogenics have the potential to enhance physical
performance by influencing various metabolic processes associated with athletic success.
Among the most popular pharmacological sports ergogenics utilized by endurance athletes
today are caffeine and ephedrine.

11
Caffeine is thought to improve endurance performance by initially stimulating the central
nervous system (CNS) and enhancing psychological arousal. Additionally, caffeine prompts
the release of epinephrine from the adrenal gland, which may further optimize physiological
functions such as cardiovascular performance and fuel utilization. The primary theory behind
the ergogenic effects of caffeine on prolonged endurance activities involves its ability to
increase the mobilization of free fatty acids and preserve muscle glycogen. Furthermore,
caffeine heightens the affinity of myofilaments for calcium and/or elevates the release of
calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in skeletal muscle, resulting in more efficient muscle
contractions.

Reference questions

1. What are the recommended nutrition strategies for endurance events like marathons,
triathlons, and ultra-distance races, including fueling during the event?
2. What are the best hydration strategies for athletes competing in hot and humid
environments, and how do electrolyte balance and fluid intake play a role?

References

1. Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, Bourdon PC, Gulbin JP, David A. Oral bovine colostrum
supplementation enhances buffer capacity but not rowing performance in elite female
rowers. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2002; 12:349–365.
2. Des Robert C, Le Bacquer O, Piloquet H, Roze JC, Darmaun D. Acute effects of
intravenous glutamine supplementation on protein metabolism in very low birth weight
infants: a stable isotope study. Pediatr Res 2002; 51:87–93.
3. Miller SL, Tipton KD, Chinkes DL. Independent and combined effects of amino acids and
glucose after resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35:449–455.
4. Anderson LL, Tufekovic G, Zebis MK, et al. The effect of resistance training combined
with timed ingestion of protein on muscle fiber size and muscle strength. Metabolism 2005;
54:151–156.
5. Beck, K.L., et al., 2015. Role of nutrition in performance enhancement and postexercise
recovery. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 6, 259–267.

12
6. Costa, R.J.S., et al., 2014. Perturbed energy balance and hydration status in ultra-endurance
runners during a 24 h ultra-marathon. British Journal of Nutrition, 112 (3), 428–437.
7. Dean, S., Braakhuis, A., and Paton, C., 2009. The effects of EGCG on fat oxidation and
endurance performance in male cyclists. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and
Exercise Metabolism, 19 (6), 624–644.
8. Goulet, E., 2013. Effect of exercise-induced dehydration on endurance performance:
evaluating the impact of exercise protocols on outcomes using a meta-analytic procedure.
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47 (11), 679–686.
9. Phillips SM, Tang JE & Moore DR (2009) The role of milkand soy-based protein in
support of muscle protein synthesis and muscle protein accretion in young and elderly
persons. J Am Coll Nutr 28, 343–354.
10. Van Proeyen K, de Bock K & Hespel P (2011) Training in the fasted state facilitates re-
activation of eEF2 activity during recovery from endurance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol
111, 1297–1305.
11. Watson P, Houghton E, Grace PB et al. (2010) The effect of delivery mode on excretion
patterns of nandrolone metabolites after ingestion of a nandrolone pro-hormone. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 42, 754–761.
12. Jeukendrup AE, Moseley L. Multiple transportable carbohydrates enhance gastric
emptying and fluid delivery. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010; 20:112–21.
13. de Oliveira EP, Burini RC, Jeukendrup A. Gastrointestinal complaints during exercise:
prevalence, etiology, and nutritional recommendations. Sports Med. 2014;44: S79–85.
14. Fleming J, James LJ. Repeated familiarisation with hypohydration attenuates the
performance decrement caused by hypohydration during treadmill running. Appl Physiol
Nutr Metab. 2014; 39:124–9.

13
 Department of Food Science & Technology

Faculty of Applied Sciences

University of Sri Jayewardenepura

B.Sc. (Special) Degree Programme in Food Science & Technology

Year III - Semester II

FST 368 2.0 Emerging Food Technologies and Bio Technology

Lecturer
Senior Prof. K.K.D.S. Ranaweera

Natural Alternatives for Chemical Food

Preservatives

AS2020727 – M.H.Pulsara

1
 Natural Alternatives for Chemical Food Preservatives: A
Comprehensive Exploration
Food preservation is crucial for ensuring the availability of safe and nutritious food. However,
the use of artificial preservatives raises concerns about their impact on health. This essay
delves into the importance of food preservation, the health implications of artificial
preservatives, and explores natural alternatives.

Artificial Preservatives Against Spoilage, Microbial Growth, and Oxidation

Introduction
Artificial preservatives have become ubiquitous in the modern food industry, with compounds
such as nitrates, benzoates, and sulfites playing pivotal roles in safeguarding the quality and
safety of various food products. This essay aims to delve into the multifaceted world of
artificial preservatives, unraveling their widespread use and exploring their indispensable
functions in preventing spoilage, thwarting microbial growth, and averting oxidative processes
in food.

Nitrates
Nitrates, a common artificial preservative, find extensive application in the preservation of
meats and certain processed foods. These compounds exhibit potent antimicrobial properties,
inhibiting the growth of bacteria, particularly Clostridium botulinum, responsible for botulism.
In a detailed exploration of nitrates, we will unravel the chemical mechanisms by which they
impede microbial proliferation and delve into their impact on the sensory attributes of
preserved food. Additionally, we will examine the controversies surrounding nitrate use,
including health concerns and regulatory perspectives, shedding light on the delicate balance
between preservation efficacy and potential risks.

Benzoates Against Mold and Yeast

Benzoates, another category of artificial preservatives, play a crucial role in preventing
spoilage caused by mold and yeast. As we embark on a comprehensive journey through the
world of benzoates, we will uncover the molecular mechanisms by which these compounds
disrupt the metabolic processes of microorganisms. A thorough examination of their
effectiveness in various food products, from beverages to baked goods, will be complemented
by an exploration of challenges associated with their use. Moreover, we will discuss the
intricate balance between the need for preservation and the evolving consumer preferences
for clean-label products, providing insights into the ongoing discourse on the role of benzoates
in contemporary food preservation practices.

Sulfites Balancing Preservation and Allergen Concerns

Sulfites, widely employed in the preservation of fruits, vegetables, and certain beverages,
serve as both preservatives and antioxidants. In this segment, we will delve into the dual
nature of sulfites, examining their role in preventing oxidation, which can lead to color
changes and flavor deterioration. Simultaneously, we will navigate through the contentious
terrain of sulfite allergies, exploring the implications of their use for sensitive individuals. By

2
dissecting the scientific aspects of sulfite functionality and scrutinizing regulatory frameworks
addressing their presence in food, we aim to provide a nuanced understanding of sulfites as
essential preservatives while addressing the imperative of consumer safety.

Introduction to Natural Preservatives

Antioxidants
Natural preservatives, embracing a repertoire of antioxidants, stand as formidable guardians
against the perils of food deterioration. Antioxidants, abundantly present in fruits, vegetables,
and whole grains, play a pivotal role in preventing oxidative reactions that lead to rancidity
and loss of nutritional value in food. In this exploration, we delve into the diverse array of
antioxidant-rich foods, elucidating their mechanisms in halting the chain reactions of free
radicals. We uncover the biochemical intricacies of antioxidants, unraveling how they not only
extend the shelf life of food but also contribute to the promotion of human health by
combatting oxidative stress. Moreover, we scrutinize the scientific literature to underscore the
reduced health risks associated with the consumption of foods naturally fortified with
antioxidants, offering a compelling case for the superiority of these natural alternatives.

Essential Oils
The aromatic symphony of essential oils not only tantalizes the senses but also serves as a
potent arsenal in the realm of natural preservation. Essential oils, extracted from various plant
sources, exhibit remarkable antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. In this segment, we
embark on a journey through the chemistry of essential oils, elucidating how their bioactive
compounds fend off spoilage-causing microorganisms and oxidative processes. We explore
real-world examples of food products infused with essential oils, showcasing their successful
integration into the culinary landscape. Furthermore, we delve into the considerations for safe
usage, addressing challenges and opportunities in harnessing the power of essential oils for
food preservation. As we navigate through the aromatic world of essential oils, we unveil their
dual role in preserving both the health of consumers and the flavors of culinary creations.

Innovations in Preservation Techniques

Natural preservatives extend beyond traditional components, ushering in an era of innovative
preservation techniques that promise not only reduced health risks but also environmental
benefits. Emerging technologies such as high-pressure processing (HPP), pulsed electric fields
(PEF), and biodegradable packaging revolutionize the landscape of food preservation. We
explore the science behind these techniques, understanding how they maintain the
nutritional integrity of food while minimizing the ecological footprint of preservation
processes. As we unravel the potential of nanotechnology, edible coatings, and enzyme
technology in natural preservation, we assess their contributions to sustainability and eco-
conscious practices. This section highlights not only the advantages of these innovative
techniques but also the challenges they pose, offering a comprehensive view of the future
trends that promise to shape the landscape of natural food preservation.

3
Natural Antioxidants

Antioxidant-Rich Foods
Antioxidants, abundant in nature's harvest of fruits and vegetables, play a pivotal role in the
prevention of spoilage by inhibiting oxidative processes. Fruits like berries, citrus fruits, and
vegetables such as spinach and kale boast a rich array of natural antioxidants, including
vitamins C and E, carotenoids, and polyphenols. These compounds act as molecular shields
against free radicals, reactive species that initiate chain reactions leading to the degradation
of fats, proteins, and other essential components in food. This section unveils the diverse
spectrum of antioxidant-rich foods, exploring their unique compositions and the mechanisms
by which they combat the detrimental effects of oxidation on food quality.

The Natural Alchemy of Shelf Life Extension

The natural properties inherent in antioxidant-rich foods contribute significantly to extending
the shelf life of a wide array of perishable items. In this exploration, we delve into the science
behind antioxidants' ability to preserve the freshness and quality of food products.
Antioxidants act as natural preservatives, retarding the development of undesirable flavors,
colors, and textures caused by oxidation. We scrutinize the chemical reactions involved in this
preservation process, elucidating how antioxidants neutralize free radicals and interrupt the
chain reactions that lead to the breakdown of essential nutrients. Through real-world
examples and case studies, we highlight the practical applications of incorporating
antioxidant-rich ingredients in food manufacturing and storage to ensure prolonged shelf life.

Sustainable Food Preservation

The utilization of natural antioxidants not only enhances food preservation but also aligns with
the principles of sustainability. As we explore the multifaceted benefits of antioxidant-rich
foods, we unravel their positive impact on reducing food waste. The ability of antioxidants to
slow down spoilage not only minimizes economic losses but also contributes to environmental
conservation by curbing the disposal of expired food items. Additionally, we investigate the
potential of incorporating antioxidant-rich foods into innovative preservation techniques, such
as natural antimicrobial coatings and edible films. This section sheds light on the broader
implications of embracing natural antioxidants in the quest for sustainable and eco-friendly
approaches to food preservation.

Essential Oils in Food Preservation

Preservative Potency of Essential Oils

Essential oils, derived from aromatic plants like rosemary and oregano, have emerged as
formidable agents in the realm of food preservation. These oils are imbued with a plethora of
bioactive compounds, such as terpenes and phenolics, which contribute to their preservative
properties. This section delves into the chemical composition of essential oils, unraveling the
specific components that endow them with antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antifungal
capabilities. By exploring the scientific research highlighted in sources like research articles
and reviews, we uncover the mechanisms through which essential oils combat spoilage,
inhibit microbial growth, and safeguard the quality of various food products. Real-world
examples and case studies showcase the successful integration of essential oils in preserving
a diverse range of perishable goods, from baked goods to meats.

4
Considerations in Essential Oil Usage
While essential oils offer a natural and potent means of food preservation, their safe and
effective application requires careful consideration. This segment addresses the importance
of proper dilution and application techniques to ensure the benefits of essential oils without
compromising food safety. We delve into the challenges and considerations associated with
incorporating essential oils into the food production process, discussing factors like sensory
impact, regulatory compliance, and consumer acceptance. Drawing insights from reputable
sources like scientific articles and expert opinions, we provide guidelines for the responsible
use of essential oils, outlining best practices that balance the preservation efficacy with
sensory and safety considerations. By exploring case studies on successful implementation
and potential pitfalls, this section equips readers with the knowledge needed to navigate the
nuanced landscape of essential oil usage in food preservation.

Innovations and Prospects in Essential Oil Preservation

As the demand for natural and sustainable food preservation solutions grows, the future holds
exciting possibilities for essential oils. This section explores emerging trends and innovations
in the field, such as nanoencapsulation techniques that enhance the stability and controlled
release of essential oil compounds. We investigate ongoing research highlighted in scientific
articles and industry reports to uncover the latest advancements that aim to overcome
existing challenges and expand the application scope of essential oils in food preservation.
From advancements in extraction methods to the exploration of synergistic blends, we unravel
the potential avenues for elevating the efficacy and versatility of essential oils. By examining
the future landscape, this segment offers a glimpse into the continued evolution of essential
oils as invaluable contributors to the quest for natural and sustainable food preservation.

Case Studies in Natural Preservatives

Success Stories
Real-world examples serve as beacons of success in the implementation of natural
preservatives across diverse food products. In exploring these case studies, we delve into
instances where the application of natural preservatives has not only extended the shelf life
of perishable goods but has also maintained or even enhanced the overall quality and safety
of the food. Examining success stories documented in research articles and industry reports,
we showcase how antioxidant-rich compounds, essential oils, and other natural preservatives
have been integrated seamlessly into various food matrices. These triumphs range from
bakery items to fresh produce, illustrating the versatility and efficacy of natural preservation
methods. By shedding light on these examples, we provide tangible evidence of the feasibility
and benefits of adopting natural preservatives in the food industry.

Lessons from the Frontlines

While success stories inspire, it's equally crucial to scrutinize the challenges faced during the
implementation of natural preservatives. This section uncovers the hurdles encountered by
manufacturers, researchers, and the food industry as they transition from traditional
preservatives to natural alternatives. Challenges may include issues related to taste and
sensory profiles, regulatory compliance, stability, and cost considerations. By drawing insights
from scientific articles and case reports, we dissect these challenges, emphasizing the

5
complexities involved in balancing the effectiveness of natural preservatives with the practical
constraints of large-scale food production. The lessons learned from these challenges
underscore the need for ongoing research and development to address gaps in knowledge,
optimize formulations, and create a conducive environment for the widespread adoption of
natural preservatives.

The Imperative of Research and Development

As we traverse the landscapes of success and challenges, it becomes evident that continued
research and development (R&D) play a pivotal role in shaping the future of natural
preservatives. This section explores the ongoing and future R&D initiatives aimed at refining
natural preservative technologies. From enhancing the extraction processes of bioactive
compounds to exploring innovative delivery systems, researchers are at the forefront of
innovation. We delve into the scientific literature, industry white papers, and expert opinions
to elucidate the potential breakthroughs that may further propel the efficacy, safety, and
applicability of natural preservatives. By understanding the imperatives of R&D, we
acknowledge that the journey towards a preservative revolution is an evolving process,
demanding collaborative efforts from scientists, industry stakeholders, and policymakers to
usher in a new era of sustainable and health-conscious food preservation.

Nanotechnology Revolutionizing Food Preservation

Nanotechnology, a groundbreaking field with applications across various industries, has

emerged as a game-changer in food preservation. The integration of nanomaterials and
nanoencapsulation techniques presents a paradigm shift, offering a route to extend the shelf
life of food without relying on traditional chemical additives. This essay explores the
transformative impact of nanotechnology on food preservation, delving into the mechanisms,
benefits, and potential concerns associated with this cutting-edge approach.

The Essence of Nanotechnology in Food Preservation

Nanotechnology operates at the nanoscale, where materials exhibit unique properties
compared to their bulk counterparts. In the realm of food preservation, the use of
nanomaterials has garnered attention for its ability to enhance the stability and safety of food
products. Nanoencapsulation, a key technique, involves enclosing active compounds within
nanoscale carriers. This encapsulation shields the bioactive components from environmental
factors, such as oxygen and light, preventing degradation and enhancing their efficacy in
preserving food.

Mechanisms Driving Shelf Life Extension

Nanomaterials, including nanoparticles and nanoemulsions, play a pivotal role in modifying
the structural and functional attributes of food. Nanoemulsions, for instance, consist of
droplets with diameters in the nanometer range, providing a larger surface area for interaction
with food components. This increased surface area enhances the dispersion of active
compounds, such as antimicrobial agents or antioxidants, throughout the food matrix. As a
result, nanotechnology acts as a safeguard against microbial contamination and oxidative
processes, prolonging the freshness of food products.

6
Benefits and Challenges of Nanotechnology in Food Preservation
The adoption of nanotechnology in food preservation brings forth an array of advantages.
Firstly, the use of nanomaterials enables targeted delivery of bioactive compounds, ensuring
their precise release at desired locations within the food matrix. Secondly, nanoencapsulation
contributes to improved solubility and bioavailability of functional ingredients, enhancing
their overall effectiveness. Additionally, the reduction or elimination of traditional chemical
preservatives aligns with the growing consumer demand for cleaner labels and minimally
processed foods.

Despite these benefits, challenges and concerns persist. The safety of ingesting nanoparticles
raises questions about potential long-term health effects. Regulatory frameworks are evolving
to address these concerns and ensure the responsible application of nanotechnology in the
food industry. Furthermore, the scalability and cost-effectiveness of nanotechnology
processes present practical challenges that require ongoing research and development.

Future Outlook and Ethical Considerations

Looking ahead, the future of nanotechnology in food preservation holds promise and
potential. Continued research aims to refine nanomaterials and encapsulation techniques,
addressing current limitations and expanding the scope of applications. Ethical considerations
regarding transparency in labeling, risk communication, and equitable access to
nanotechnology-derived foods must be integral to the development and commercialization of
such innovations.

In conclusion, nanotechnology represents a revolutionary approach to food preservation,

leveraging nanomaterials and nanoencapsulation to extend shelf life without relying on
conventional chemical additives. As research advances, and ethical considerations are
prioritized, nanotechnology is poised to redefine the landscape of the food industry, offering
sustainable and effective solutions for preserving the quality and safety of our food supply.

Edible Coatings and Films in Food Preservation

Edible coatings and films have emerged as innovative solutions in the realm of food
preservation, revolutionizing the way we protect and extend the shelf life of perishable
products. These coatings, often derived from natural sources, serve as a protective barrier,
creating a shield against external factors that contribute to food deterioration. In this essay,
we explore the development of edible coatings and films, emphasizing their role in enhancing
preservation and the notable technique of High-Pressure Processing (HPP) as a
complementary non-thermal method.

Development of Coatings from Natural Sources

The quest for sustainable and environmentally friendly food preservation methods has led to
the development of coatings sourced from natural materials. These coatings, often composed
of biopolymers, proteins, or plant extracts, offer a biodegradable and safe alternative to
traditional packaging. The utilization of natural sources not only aligns with the increasing
demand for eco-friendly practices but also introduces unique properties that contribute to the
preservation of food. These coatings act as barriers against moisture, gases, and external
contaminants, preventing spoilage and extending the freshness of a variety of food products.

7
High-Pressure Processing (HPP) as a Non-Thermal Technique
High-Pressure Processing stands out as a non-thermal preservation technique that holds great
promise in maintaining the nutritional value of food. Unlike traditional thermal methods, HPP
utilizes elevated pressures to achieve preservation without the application of excessive heat.
This method is particularly advantageous in preserving heat-sensitive compounds, such as
vitamins, enzymes, and delicate flavors, which may be compromised by traditional thermal
processes. HPP ensures food safety without compromising the organoleptic properties,
appearance, or nutritional values of the treated products.

The non-thermal nature of HPP minimizes the risk of nutrient degradation, providing a viable
solution for the preservation of products with high nutritional value. By subjecting food to
elevated pressures, HPP effectively inactivates spoilage microorganisms, pathogens, and
enzymes without the need for excessive heat. This makes it an ideal choice for preserving
fresh juices, dairy products, and other perishables where maintaining the nutritional profile is
crucial.

In conclusion, the development of edible coatings and films from natural sources showcases
a shift towards sustainable and eco-friendly food preservation practices. These coatings act as
protective layers, enhancing the shelf life of various food products. Concurrently, High-
Pressure Processing, as a non-thermal technique, contributes significantly to the preservation
of nutritional quality, opening new avenues for the food industry to meet the demands of
consumers seeking both freshness and health benefits.

Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) for Microbial Inactivation

Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) represent a cutting-edge technology that has gained prominence
in the food industry for its remarkable ability to naturally inactivate microorganisms, ensuring
food safety without the need for excessive heat or chemical additives. PEF involves the
application of short pulses of high-intensity electric fields to food products. This process
induces microbial cell inactivation by selectively disrupting the membrane barriers in cells,
providing a non-thermal alternative for preserving the freshness and quality of various food
items. PEF has been widely recognized for its effectiveness in killing vegetative bacteria, yeast,
and molds at mild temperatures, minimizing the impact on the nutritional and sensory
attributes of the treated products.

The unique mechanism of PEF presents a natural and sustainable approach to microbial
inactivation. Unlike traditional preservation methods that rely on heat, PEF selectively targets
microorganisms, leaving the overall quality of the food product intact. This technology has
been successfully applied in the preservation of beverages, juices, and liquid foods where
maintaining the natural flavors and nutritional content is crucial. As consumers increasingly
seek minimally processed and additive-free food options, PEF emerges as a key player in
meeting these demands, providing a natural solution for extending the shelf life of perishable
goods.

Plant-Based Antimicrobial Compounds

In parallel to the technological advancements in PEF, the exploration of plant-based
antimicrobial compounds offers a holistic perspective on natural approaches to food
preservation. Plants have evolved an intricate defense mechanism against pathogens, and

8
scientists have tapped into these natural reservoirs to identify compounds with potent
antimicrobial properties. Alkaloids, flavonoids, essential oils, and other bioactive molecules
present in various plant extracts exhibit strong antimicrobial activities, acting as nature's own
defense against harmful microorganisms.

Alkaloids, classified based on their chemical structure, have been studied for their
antibacterial and antifungal properties. The diversity of alkaloids found in different plant
species provides a rich source of compounds that can be harnessed for their preservative
potential. Similarly, flavonoids, known for their antioxidant properties, contribute to the
antimicrobial activity of plant extracts. Essential oils, extracted from aromatic plants, are rich
in volatile compounds that exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects.

The exploration of plant-based antimicrobial compounds not only aligns with the growing
preference for natural and clean-label ingredients but also opens avenues for sustainable
practices in the food industry. Incorporating these compounds into food preservation
strategies can enhance the safety and quality of products while meeting the evolving
expectations of conscious consumers.

In conclusion, Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) and plant-based antimicrobial compounds represent
two interconnected realms of natural approaches to food preservation. PEF, with its non-
thermal and targeted microbial inactivation, is a technological marvel that preserves the
freshness of foods. Simultaneously, plant-based antimicrobial compounds, derived from
nature's own defense mechanisms, offer sustainable and clean-label solutions for ensuring
food safety. The integration of these natural approaches reflects the ongoing evolution of the
food industry towards more environmentally friendly and consumer-conscious practices.

Biodegradable Packaging

Biodegradable packaging has emerged as a beacon of sustainability, transforming the

landscape of the packaging industry. This innovative approach addresses environmental
concerns by providing materials that can naturally decompose, reducing the burden of plastic
pollution. Biodegradable packaging materials, such as those derived from plant-based
sources, offer a compelling alternative to traditional packaging methods. The advantages of
biodegradable packaging extend beyond environmental impact, influencing the very essence
of food preservation.

Advantages of Biodegradable Packaging

Biodegradable packaging materials have become instrumental in preserving the freshness and
quality of packaged foods. These materials contribute to an extended shelf life and storability
of various products, including fruits, vegetables, and more. The treatment of biodegradable
packaging enhances the likelihood of reducing premature spoilage, aligning with the broader
goal of minimizing food waste. This reduction in waste is particularly significant in the context
of the global effort to create a more sustainable and circular economy.

The shift towards biodegradable packaging is rooted in its inherent properties. These
materials, often nontoxic and derived from renewable resources, not only minimize
environmental impact but also reduce the need for additional preservatives in food products.

9
As the demand for clean-label and natural products rises, biodegradable packaging aligns
seamlessly with consumer preferences for sustainable and eco-friendly choices.

Enzyme Technology for Preservation

Enzyme technology represents a natural and efficient means of preserving food, capitalizing
on the catalytic power of biological molecules. Enzymes, as biological catalysts, play a crucial
role in inhibiting spoilage and oxidation, thus extending the shelf life of various food items.
Unlike traditional preservatives that may raise concerns among health-conscious consumers,
enzymes operate naturally, aligning with the clean-label trend in the food industry.

How Enzymes Work in Preservation

Enzymes function by catalyzing specific biochemical reactions, influencing the composition
and structure of food components. In the context of preservation, enzymes inhibit the
activities of microorganisms and oxidative processes that lead to spoilage. For example,
enzymes can disrupt the cell membranes of bacteria or neutralize reactive oxygen species,
preventing the degradation of food products.

The application of enzyme technology in food preservation has gained traction across multiple
industries. Proteases, amylases, and lipases are examples of enzymes that can be strategically
employed to maintain the quality and safety of food. These enzymes act selectively on specific
substrates, offering a targeted and controlled approach to preservation without the need for
synthetic additives.

The Natural Benefits of Enzyme Preservation

Enzyme technology not only contributes to extending the shelf life of foods but also preserves
their nutritional value and sensory attributes. Unlike some conventional preservation
methods that may compromise the nutritional content of foods, enzymes operate under mild
conditions, preserving vitamins, antioxidants, and other essential nutrients. Additionally, the
natural flavor, color, and texture of food products are better retained through enzyme-based
preservation.

The Synergy of Biodegradable Packaging and Enzyme Technology

The synergy between biodegradable packaging and enzyme technology marks a harmonious
convergence of sustainable practices in the food industry. Biodegradable packaging reduces
the environmental footprint, while enzyme technology ensures the natural preservation of
food without the need for synthetic preservatives. Together, these approaches contribute to
a holistic and environmentally conscious model of food production and consumption.

In conclusion, the marriage of biodegradable packaging and enzyme technology represents a

paradigm shift in the way we approach food preservation. This sustainable duo not only
addresses the pressing issues of plastic pollution and food waste but also aligns with evolving
consumer preferences for natural, clean-label products. As the food industry continues to
embrace eco-friendly practices, the combination of biodegradable packaging and enzyme
technology stands at the forefront of a more sustainable and resilient future.

10
Genetic Modification for Natural Preservation

Biotechnological approaches have revolutionized agriculture, offering innovative solutions for

enhancing natural preservatives in crops. The marriage of genetics and agriculture has led to
the development of genetically modified (GM) crops with improved resistance to pests and
diseases, ultimately reducing the need for synthetic preservatives. This biotechnological
marvel has far-reaching implications for sustainable farming practices and food preservation.

Biotechnological Strategies for Crop Improvement

Genetic modification involves the insertion or modification of specific genes in crop plants to
confer desirable traits. In the context of natural preservation, biotechnological strategies focus
on enhancing the production of natural compounds with preservative properties. This
includes the engineering of crops to produce higher levels of antioxidants, antimicrobial
peptides, and other bioactive molecules that naturally protect against spoilage.

Genomic Approaches
Advancements in genomics play a pivotal role in identifying and manipulating genes
associated with natural preservatives. Scientists utilize techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 to
precisely edit the plant genome, enabling the targeted enhancement of preservative traits.
Genomic approaches provide a powerful toolset for tailoring crops to withstand
environmental stressors and minimize post-harvest losses.

Proteomic and Metabolomic Insights

Proteomic and metabolomic studies contribute to understanding the intricate mechanisms
underlying natural preservation in crops. By analyzing the plant's protein and metabolite
profiles, researchers gain insights into the synthesis and regulation of compounds involved in
preservation. This knowledge facilitates the development of crops with optimized
preservative capabilities.

Electrolyzed Water as a Preservative: A Chemical-Free Disinfection

In the realm of food preservation, electrolyzed water has emerged as a game-changer, offering
a chemical-free alternative for disinfection. This innovative approach utilizes electrolysis to
transform ordinary water into a potent disinfectant, providing a safe and environmentally
friendly means of preserving food without the use of traditional chemicals.

The Electrolysis Process

Electrolyzed water is produced through the electrolysis of a dilute salt solution. This process
generates two key components: hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
Hypochlorous acid, a powerful oxidizing agent, serves as the primary disinfectant, while
sodium hydroxide contributes to the overall alkalinity of the solution. The resulting
electrolyzed water exhibits strong antimicrobial properties.

Applications in Food Preservation

The applications of electrolyzed water in food preservation are diverse and impactful. Its
antimicrobial properties make it effective in reducing or eliminating pathogens on various food
surfaces, extending shelf life, and enhancing overall food safety. Electrolyzed water can be

11
used for washing fruits and vegetables, sanitizing equipment, and treating water used in food
processing.

Environmental Advantages
One of the key advantages of electrolyzed water as a preservative is its environmental
friendliness. Unlike traditional chemical disinfectants, electrolyzed water breaks down into
harmless components, leaving no chemical residues on food or in the environment. This aligns
with the global push for sustainable and eco-friendly food preservation practices.

Synergies and Future Perspectives

The convergence of genetic modification for natural preservation and the application of
electrolyzed water represents a powerful synergy in the quest for sustainable and chemical-
free food preservation. Integrating biotechnological advancements in crop genetics with
innovative, eco-friendly disinfection methods opens new frontiers for ensuring food safety
and security.

In conclusion, the marriage of genetic modification and electrolyzed water showcases the
multifaceted approach to natural food preservation. Biotechnological strategies empower
crops with inherent preservative capabilities, reducing reliance on external chemicals.
Simultaneously, electrolyzed water provides a green alternative for disinfection, aligning with
the global shift towards sustainable and clean food preservation practices.

Blockchain Technology for Traceability: Transparency in the Food Supply Chain

Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative force in the food industry, specifically
in enhancing traceability and transparency. This decentralized ledger system ensures an
immutable record of transactions, fostering trust and accountability throughout the supply
chain. One of its significant applications is in sourcing natural ingredients, where the need for
authenticity and sustainability is paramount.

Enhancing Transparency in Ingredient Sourcing

Blockchain ensures that every step in the production and distribution of natural ingredients is
securely recorded. This transparency is crucial for consumers who prioritize knowing the origin
and journey of the ingredients in their food. By enabling a tamper-proof and easily accessible
ledger, blockchain builds a bridge between producers, suppliers, and consumers, fostering a
new era of accountability and ethical sourcing.

Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

In tandem with blockchain, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) brings predictive
capabilities to the forefront of food preservation. Real-time monitoring powered by AI
algorithms enables the proactive identification of potential spoilage risks. This technology
goes beyond traditional methods, offering dynamic insights into the condition of perishable
goods throughout the supply chain.

AI's Role in Predicting and Preventing Food Spoilage

AI algorithms analyze vast datasets, incorporating information from blockchain records,
environmental conditions, and historical patterns. This comprehensive approach allows AI

12
systems to predict potential spoilage events, empowering stakeholders to take preventive
measures. From adjusting storage conditions to expediting transportation, AI-driven solutions
significantly reduce the chances of food spoilage, contributing to both economic and
environmental sustainability.

Challenges and Considerations in the Confluence of Blockchain and AI

As revolutionary as this integration is, it comes with its own set of challenges and
considerations. Addressing safety concerns, regulatory challenges, and public perception is
crucial for the widespread adoption of these technologies.

Safety Concerns
Ensuring the safety and security of blockchain and AI systems is paramount. Safeguards
against cyber threats and data breaches must be implemented to maintain the integrity of the
information stored on the blockchain. Additionally, securing AI algorithms from malicious
interference is vital for preventing misinformation and maintaining trust in the system.

Regulatory Challenges
The intersection of blockchain and AI in the food industry raises complex regulatory questions.
Governments and international bodies need to develop frameworks that accommodate these
technologies while ensuring compliance with existing food safety and privacy regulations.
Establishing a harmonized regulatory environment is essential for fostering innovation
without compromising safety.

Public Perception
Public perception plays a pivotal role in the successful adoption of blockchain and AI in the
food industry. Educating consumers about the benefits of these technologies in terms of
traceability, safety, and sustainability is crucial. Clear communication about the safeguards in
place and the ethical use of data can help build trust and acceptance among the general
public.

In conclusion, the confluence of blockchain and AI in the food industry holds immense promise
for revolutionizing transparency, traceability, and food safety. Overcoming the challenges and
considerations requires a collaborative effort from industry stakeholders, regulators, and the
public to ensure a future where the food supply chain is not only technologically advanced
but also trusted and embraced by consumers.

Reference Questions
01. In term of regulatory frameworks, what measures or guidelines are in place to
ensure the safety and efficacy of natural alternatives for chemical food
preservatives?

02. How have advancements in natural alternatives for chemical food preservatives
impacted the traditional methods of food preservation, and what evidence
supports their efficacy in maintaining food safety and quality?

13
References

1. Amorati, R., Foti, M., & Valgimigli, L. (2023). Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils.
Antioxidants, 12.
2. Atieh, M., Alsabeeha, N., Payne, A., Ali, S., Faggion, C. M., & Esposito, M. (2021).
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for
dental implant site development. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4.
3. Bakkali, F., Averbeck, S., Averbeck, D., & Idaomar, M. (2008). Biological effects of
essential oils--a review. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46(2), 446-75.
4. Burt, S. (2004). Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications
in foods--a review. Journal of Food Microbiology, 94(3), 223-53.
5. Gulcin, I. (2020). Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview.
Archives of Toxicology, 94, 651-715.
6. Ighodaro, O., Ighodaro, O., & Akinloye, O. (2018). First line defence antioxidants-
superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their
fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alexandria Journal of
Medicine, 54, 287-293.
7. Jahan, R., Bodratti, A. M., Tsianou, M., & Alexandridis, P. (2019). Biosurfactants, natural
alternatives to synthetic surfactants: Physicochemical properties and applications.
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 102061.
8. Karwowska, M., & Kononiuk, A. (2020). Nitrates/Nitrites in Food—Risk for Nitrosative
Stress and Benefits. Antioxidants, 9.
9. Kong, I., Degraeve, P., & Pui, L. (2022). Polysaccharide-Based Edible Films Incorporated
with Essential Oil Nanoemulsions: Physico-Chemical, Mechanical Properties and Its
Application in Food Preservation—A Review. Foods, 11.
10. Kumar, S., Singh, N., Devi, L. S., Kumar, S., Kamle, M., Kumar, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2021).
Neem oil and its nanoemulsion in sustainable food preservation and packaging:
Current status and future prospects. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research.
11. Kumari, P. K., Akhila, S., Rao, Y. S., & Devi, B. (2019). Alternative to Artificial
Preservatives. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 10, 99-102.
12. Lobo, V., Patil, A., Phatak, A., & Chandra, N. (2010). Free radicals, antioxidants and
functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 4, 118-126.
13. Lv, L., Shen, Y., Liu, J., Meng, X., Gao, X., Zhou, M., Zhang, Y., Gong, D., Zheng, Y., & Zhou,
Z. (2021). Computational Screening of High Activity and Selectivity TM/g-C3N4 Single-
Atom Catalysts for Electrocatalytic Reduction of Nitrates to Ammonia. Journal of
Physical Chemistry Letters, 11143-11150.
14. Mittler, R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant
Science, 7(9), 405-10.
15. Phothisarattana, D., Wongphan, P., Promhuad, K., Promsorn, J., & Harnkarnsujarit, N.
(2022). Blown film extrusion of PBAT/TPS/ZnO nanocomposites for shelf-life extension
of meat packaging. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 214, 112472.
16. Valko, M., Leibfritz, D., Moncol’, J., Cronin, M., Mazúr, M., & Telser, J. (2007). Free
radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease.
International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 39(1), 44-84.
17. Velusamy, K., Periyasamy, S., Kumar, P., Vo, D., Sindhu, J., Sneka, D., & Subhashini, B.
(2021). Advanced techniques to remove phosphates and nitrates from waters: a
review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19, 3165-3180.

14
18. Wang, H., Luo, H., Zhang, Z., Zheng, W.-F., Yin, Y., Qian, H., Zhang, J., & Ma, S. (2020).
Pd-Catalyzed Enantioselective Syntheses of Trisubstituted Allenes via Coupling of
Propargylic Benzoates with Organoboronic Acids. Journal of the American Chemical
Society.
19. Zapaśnik, A., Sokołowska, B., & Bryła, M. (2022). Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food
Preservation and Safety. Foods, 11.

15