Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165

Reinforcing Visual Content Integrity through

Image Restoration and
AI Recognition: Literature Survey
M. Gangappa1; Eloori Karthik2; Gaddampally Shreyas Reddy3;
Gudimetla Satya Manjunadha Reddy4; Mohammad Shoaib5
Associate Professor1
1,2,3,4,5,6
Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engg & Technology Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Abstract:- Over time, images may undergo degradation
due to various factors, leading to loss of clarity and
visual appeal. The motivation behind this study is to aid
in the restoration of precious memories, as pictures serve
triggers for cherished recollections, and enhancing
image quality can improve clarity and visual comfort.
The significance of this research lies in its potential to
help individuals recover and preserve cherished
memories captured in damaged images. Restoring the
visual quality of images can evoke emotions and
facilitate stronger connections to the past. In recent past
AI has advanced significantly in these areas. However,
the potential for misinformation and deep fake
proliferation has raised concerns about the authenticity
and credibility of visual content. In response to this
challenge, we aimed at developing an automated system
to discern between AI- generated images and original
photographs with high accuracy. Additionally,
enhancing image quality has various practical benefits,
such as increased clarity, improved viability, and
reduced strain on the eyes when viewing the restored
images. Overall, this research demonstrates the
effectiveness of deep learning with GANs for image
restoration, highlighting its value in recovering
invaluable memories and enhancing visual content for
broader applications. The results of this study showcase
the potential of AI-driven image restoration techniques
to positively impact our personal lives and the way we
interact with visual data in the digital age.
Keywords:- Deep Learning, GAN, Machine Learning, Image In-
Painting, Deep Fake.
I. INTRODUCTION
Images are essential to our visual environment because
they are effective means of expression, recording, and
communication. Images, however, are not always ideal; they
can have a number of flaws, like missing or damaged areas.
The act of revitalizing these photos by fixing or completing
the missing or damaged areas is known as image restoration.
picture in painting is a technique that allows for the
achievement of one intriguing and difficult aspect of picture
restoration.
The art and science of selectively painting or recreating
missing or degraded areas of images to revitalize them is
known as image in painting. It entails replacing damaged or
undesirable areas of the image with new content while
maintaining the image's overall coherence and integrity.
Image in painting has a wide range of uses, from object
removal and image completion to photo enhancement.
For picture in painting, many strategies and techniques
have been created over time, each has advantages and
disadvantages of its own. The field of image in painting has
advanced significantly, moving from traditional patch-based
methods to complex deep learning algorithms. These
techniques are now used in many fields, including as
multimedia, computer vision, image processing, and
medical imaging [1].
The review examines on the state of image restoration
via image in painting, focusing on the important innovations
and methods that have influenced the industry. The
development of in painting methods will be examined,
covering from the initial human involvement to the present
data-driven deep learning period of time. The following text
will also be discussed by us, along with the difficulties and
potential paths forward, providing an overview of this
rapidly developing field's future and its possible effects on
picture restoration and associated applications. More
discussions will be dedicated to the challenges faced in this
field and how they can possibly be overcome. A
comprehensive overview will be provided, shedding light on
the future advancements in this rapidly developing field.
The implications of these advancements for the realm of
picture restoration and other related applications will also be
examined in depth. In this way, a broader understanding of
the future direction and the potential impact of this cutting-
edge field will be accrued. The field of image in painting is
a dynamic and stimulating field of study that is constantly
expanding the possibilities for picture restoration and
alteration.
Producing incredibly realistic artificial intelligence
(AI)-generated content—such as pictures, movies, and
texts—has become standard procedure in an era of quickly
developing AI and machine learning technologies. These
artificial intelligence (AI)-generated works, sometimes

IJISRT24FEB1068 www.ijisrt.com 1371

Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2024
known as "deep fakes" or "synthetic media," have the power
to conflate fact and fiction. Although AI-generated material
has valid applications in automation and the creative arts,
there are significant risks associated with false information,
invasions of privacy, and malevolent intent. As a result,
identifying AI-generated content has become crucial to
maintaining the accuracy of digital data and media.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated material is
generally created with methods such as Generative
Adversarial Networks (GANs) and deep neural networks,
which can make photos and movies that are visually
identical to actual ones. These artificial intelligence (AI)
elements can be used for a variety of tasks, including as
editing photos, making fake movies, and even producing
wholly imaginary writing.
This review of the literature delves into the crucial
field of identifying AI-generated information and images,
which is a field that is constantly developing as detection
methods become more sophisticated and AI-generated
media becomes of higher quality.
Overall, this research demonstrates the effectiveness of
deep learning with GANs for image restoration, highlighting
its value in recovering invaluable memories and enhancing
visual content for broader applications. The results of this
study showcase the potential of AI-driven image restoration
techniques to positively impact our personal lives and the
way we interact with visual data in the digital age.
In section II explains about the background study of
image inpainting methods and AI generated image detection
techniques. In section III, literature review has been
explained that delve us through the ways of implementing
image inpainting and AI driven content detection. In section
IV, the conclusion is given in the reference to all the
research papers that are used to study about the image in
painting techniques.
II. BACKGROUND
Images are essential to modern civilization because
they may be used for artistic expression, archiving, and
visual communication across all media. But pictures
frequently suffer from a variety of deteriorations, from
physical harm like stains and scratches to digital arte facts
like missing data and compression arte facts. The goal of
image restoration is to improve or restore these pictures so
they are more aesthetically pleasing, educational, or
comprehensive.
A specialised area of image restoration called "image
in painting" is concerned with restoring damaged or missing
areas of images. This is a difficult assignment because it
calls for the creation of a believable that blends in with the
current image without affecting its general structure and
cohesion. Image in painting has become more popular in the
domains of computer vision, image processing, and related
sciences. Its uses are diverse and include photo repair,
object removal, and image completeness.
IJISRT24FEB1068 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Image in painting has a multi-decade history, with
early techniques based on manually created rules and
heuristics. The in painting tasks that these approaches were
unable to tackle were difficult ones. However, the area saw
a major upheaval with the introduction of deep learning and
machine learning. With their ability to learn from massive
datasets and generate realistic results, Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNNs) and other deep learning architectures
have completely changed the field of picture in painting.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and U-Net
are two recent advances in deep learning-based in painting
models that have greatly enhanced the quality and realism of
in painted images. These models are able to provide material
that blends in seamlessly with the surroundings by
comprehending the context of the image.
Even though picture in painting has advanced
significantly, there are still issues to be resolved, like
managing sizable in painting regions, maintaining global
coherence, and processing images in real time. The area is
still developing, looking at new methods, effective
algorithms, and uses in a range of fields, such as medical
imaging and the creative arts.
The burgeoning science of artificial intelligence,
especially in deep learning, has led to the production of
artificial intelligence-generated content, often known as
synthetic media or deep fakes. The output of algorithms
such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), these
artificial intelligence (AI) materials may create convincing
images, movies, and text that are almost identical to actual
content. Although artificial intelligence (AI)-generated
media has valid uses in automation, entertainment, and the
creative arts, there are also serious ethical issues.
The growth of AI-generated material has led to
concerns pertaining to misrepresentation, privacy violation,
and the possibility for malevolent use. Artificial intelligence
(AI)-generated deep fakes can be used to propagate false
information, assume human identities, alter visual proof, and
trick viewers. Therefore, in order to preserve the legitimacy
and authenticity of digital media, it is now essential to
develop methods and instruments for identifying content
generated by artificial intelligence.
A multifaceted strategy is required to detect content
generated by artificial intelligence (AI). This technique may
entail forensic investigation, metadata study, machine
learning models, and the usage of different indicators and
arte facts left behind by the generative algorithms. As AI-
generated material grows more complex and challenging to
distinguish from actual information, researchers and
engineers are constantly striving to stay ahead of the curve.
In addition to fighting false information and
safeguarding privacy, the development of AI content
detection techniques is crucial for maintaining the security
of digital environments and confirming the legitimacy of
media across a range of industries, including entertainment,
social media, law enforcement, and journalism.
1372
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2024
Furthermore, a crucial topic of discussion in this developing
industry is the ethics of the usage and regulation of such
technology.
III. LITERATURE WORK
It Involved searching and reviewing relevant academic
literature from Google Scholar and IEEE Explorer
databases. These databases were chosen due to their
comprehensive coverage of scientific and technical
literature. We used a combination of keywords and Boolean
operators to search for s relevant to our project.
 Few Models which Help Image Restoration :
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been
instrumental in advancing the field of image in painting.
Researchers have developed GAN-based in painting models
that can generate high-quality content for missing or
corrupted regions[15].
[6] paper demonstrates notable models such as Context
Encoders (CE) and Partial Convolutional Neural Networks
(PCN) have employed GAN architectures to generate
realistic in painted images. CE uses an adversarial loss to
encourage realistic content generation, while PCN
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
incorporates partial convolution layers to adaptively handle
missing data.
Some recent research has explored the synergy
between GANs and diffusion models for image in painting,
this hybrid approach combines the generative power of
GANs with the sequential refinement process of diffusion
models [1].By using a GAN to guide the diffusion process,
these models achieve high-quality in paintings with fine
details and global coherence. Research in this area continues
to evolve with innovative model architectures [10].
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are widely
used in in painting due to their ability to capture spatial
information and learn from large datasets. Models like U-
Net and Deep Fill leverage CNNs for in painting tasks[1].U-
Net, a popular architecture, employs an encoder-decoder
structure with skip connections to generate in paintings
efficiently. DeepFill, on the other hand, uses a CNN to
predict missing pixels while considering global context.
These advanced in painting techniques find
applications in various domains, including medical image
restoration, video post-production, image editing, and
artistic creation. The ability to restore damaged or
incomplete images is crucial in these fields.

Table 1: Outline of Various Image Inpointing Techniques

AUTHOR METHOD ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
• Preservation of Image Structure and Coherence • High memory requirements
• Handling Large Inpainting Regions • Limited Applications
G. Sridevi Diffusion based • Reduced Artifacts and Texture Consistency • Processing extremely high-resolution
[12] techniques. images or long video sequences with
diffusion-based techniques can be
cumbersome.
• CNNs excel at automatically extracting • Large Computational Requirements
relevant features from images
evin Walker • CNNs can be adapted to inpainting tasks of • High Memory Usage
CNN’s
[1] various complexities
• CNNs can generalize well from diverse
training data

• Realistic Content Generation • GANs are susceptible to mode collapse, a

phenomenon where the generator focuses
H. Wang [15] GAN’s • GANs are capable of understanding the on a subset of possible modes in the data
contextual information in an image distribution, leading to a lack of diversity
in the generated content.

Computer vision, while efficient, may lack

Computer Computer vision algorithms can process and the human touch and might struggle with
Q. Fan [8]
Vision inpaint large amounts of data relatively quickly. subjective or context-specific inpainting
requirements.
Local and
By considering both local and global This could result in longer processing
Ruisong Global
information, the inpainting process becomes times, especially for high-resolution images
Zhang [11] refinement
more informed and context-aware or in real-time applications.
technique

IJISRT24FEB1068 www.ijisrt.com 1373

Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

The dynamic selection mechanism can contribute

Dynamic Training such networks may require a
Ning Wang to improved inpainting quality by selecting the
Selection substantial amount of labeled data and
[13] most relevant information for each inpainted
Network careful tuning of parameters
region.

Transformers can efficiently represent complex

Jianlong Fu Bidirectional Transformers, especially deep and complex
features in the image, facilitating a more accurate
[17] Transformers ones, can be challenging to interpret
inpainting process.
The aggregation of contextual information
Aggregated These transformations often operate at multiple
Yanhong from various scales and regions may require
Contextual scales, allowing for effective adaptation to
Zeng a more sophisticated architecture and
Transformations different levels of detail in the image
training process.
• It may not be effective in cases where
Songwen Colour space • It is sensitive to anomalies in color
manipulation involves other factors like
Mo[22] combinations. distribution, texture, and patterns.
face replacement or voice synthesis.

Diffusion • Diffusion models can be prone to

Jireh Jam [10] • Handling Complex Inpainting Scenarios
models overfitting.

Bhavsar, A. • Developing, fine-tuning, and maintaining

CNN’s
V.[20] • Pre-trained CNN models can be fine-tuned CNN models can be complex.
• GANs require substantial amounts of
• GANs are capable of learning and recognizing
Xiao, Y.[25] GAN’s training data
patterns and features
• GANs are susceptible to mode collapse

• Depending on the watermarking

Zhengyuan Watermark • It is a reliable means of verifying the technique employed, there's a risk of
Jiang [23] based detection authenticity of the content degrading the quality of the original
content

• The versatility enables the transfer of

• While cross-concept settings offer
knowledge and capabilities across different
Hyeonseong Using cross versatility, they may lack the specificity
contexts, potentially saving time and resources
Jeon[24] concept settings and fine-tuning that a model dedicated to
in training separate models for each specific
a particular concept could provide
concept

It may struggle with abstract concepts or

tasks that require a deeper understanding of
Computer vision excels in visual understanding, context, emotions, or complex
Bhavsar, A. Computer
allowing machines to interpret and make relationships.
V.[20] Vision
decisions based on visual data This limitation becomes apparent in areas
where human intuition and contextual
understanding play a significant role.

Misinterpretation of context or failure to

Out of context It can provide robust security measures by adequately define what is considered
Xiao, Y.[25] object detection flagging activities or data points that appear out normal can lead to false positives or
of the ordinary, helping to detect potential threats negatives, impacting the reliability of the
detection system.

 Few Models which Help AI Generated Content
Detection :
CNNs can be employed to analyze the visual aspects of
images and videos, making them effective in detecting
anomalies in content. Specifically, CNNs are used to
compare the input image or video with known patterns or
characteristics associated with AI-generated
content[20].Pre-trained CNN models can be fine-tuned to
classify images or videos as either real or AI-generated.
These models are trained on large datasets of both real and
AI-generated content to learn patterns and features that are
indicative of manipulation. During inference, the model
evaluates the input media and outputs a probability or
classification indicating the likelihood of manipulation[1].
Paper [25] describes how GANs can be used in a
counter-GAN or adversarial approach for AI-generated
content detection , by training a discriminator GAN model
to distinguish between real and AI-generated content,
discrepancies in the generated content can be revealed. The

IJISRT24FEB1068 www.ijisrt.com 1374

Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2024
discriminator GAN model is trained on a dataset containing
both real and AI-generated media. During training, the
model learns to identify subtle differences and
inconsistencies in AI-generated content. In practice, the
discriminator can evaluate new media content and provide a
score or classification based on its authenticity.
Diffusion models can be applied to AI-generated
content detection by analyzing the statistical properties and
pixel-level features of media. They aim to identify
anomalies in the content that deviate from natural
patterns[10].Diffusion models are trained to understand the
statistical distribution of natural media content. During the
detection process, they analyze the distribution of pixel
values, textures, and other visual features in the input media.
Deviations from expected statistical properties can be used
to flag potentially AI-generated content.
Using color space channel combinations for AI-
generated content detection involves analyzing the statistical
properties and patterns in the color channels of an image or
video. By examining the channels (such as Red, Green, and
Blue), we can detect anomalies and inconsistencies that may
be indicative of AI-generated content.The RGB color space
separates an image into its three primary color channels:
Red, Green, and Blue. Analyzing these channels separately
can help detect variations and inconsistencies[22].One
common method is to compare the individual color channels
of an image. AI-generated content may exhibit disparities in
color distribution or patterns across channels. For example,
if the Red channel of a face in an image has different
features compared to the Green or Blue channels, it can
raise suspicions of manipulation.
IV. CONCLUSION
This study clarified the literature review on artificial
intelligence (AI) generated content identification and image
inpainting methods. The following approaches can be used
to broadly categorise image inpainting techniques:
 Making use of diffusion models
 Using CNN
 Making use of GANs
 Making use of Color Space channels
 Computer Vision
The following techniques can be used to detect
artificial intelligence-generated content:
 Models of diffusion
 GAN's
 Transformers
 CNN’s
These methods aid in enhancing the effectiveness and
quality of AI-generated content identification as well as
image in painting.
IJISRT24FEB1068 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
The literature survey on AI-generated content detection
techniques, including Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNNs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and
diffusion models, reveals a diverse landscape of methods
and approaches for addressing the critical issue of
identifying manipulated or synthetic media. These
techniques have developed in response to the increasing
complexity of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content,
including deep fakes and altered photographs.
CNNs have proven to be useful for analysing visual
content in photos and movies. Their adaptability, transfer
learning, and feature extraction characteristics make them
useful tools for content detection. Nevertheless, issues with
overfitting, data needs, and model interpretability still need
to be resolved[1].
Using the same technology as AI-generated content,
GANs offer a distinctive adversarial method to content
discovery. They are quite good at identifying patterns and
spotting abnormalities in images. Although GANs provide a
strong answer, there are issues with training complexity,
data needs, computational demands, and adversarial attack
resilience[22].
Diffusion models provide statistical anomaly detection
by highlighting content qualities that deviate from
expectations. Notable benefits include their ability to handle
intricate inpainting settings with effectiveness and results
that may be understood. For their implementation, however,
factors including data needs, processing requirements, and
fine-tuning to lower false positives are taken into
account[10].
The literature review concludes by highlighting the
continued necessity for a variety of flexible techniques to
identify information created by artificial intelligence.
Depending on the particular use case, the resources at hand,
and the trade-off between recall and precision, the right
technique will be chosen. Staying abreast of the rapidly
changing environment of AI-generated media will probably
require combining various approaches and engaging in
interdisciplinary collaboration. The field of content
detection will develop in step with the advancement of
technology, offering more powerful solutions to protect the
legitimacy and authenticity of digital material.
REFERENCES
[1]. Jam, J., Kendrick, C., Walker, K., Drouard, V., Hsu,
J. G. S., & Yap, M. H. (2021, February). A
comprehensive review of past and present image
inpainting methods. Computer Vision and Image
Understanding, 203, 103147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2020.103147.
[2]. Isogawa, M., Mikami, D., Iwai, D., Kimata, H., &
Sato, K. (2018). Mask Optimization for Image
Inpainting. IEEE Access, 6, 69728–69741.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2877401 .
1375
Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2024
[3]. Guo, Q., Gao, S., Zhang, X., Yin, Y., & Zhang, C.
(2018, June 1). Patch-Based Image Inpainting via
Two-Stage Low Rank Approximation. IEEE
Transactions on Visualization and Computer
Graphics, 24(6), 2023–2036.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2017.2702738
[4]. Lu, H., Liu, Q., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., & Deng, X.
(2017, March 13). Gradient-based low rank method
and its application in image inpainting. Multimedia
Tools and Applications, 77(5), 5969–5993.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4509-0
[5]. Xue, H., Zhang, S., & Cai, D. (2017, September).
Depth Image Inpainting: Improving Low Rank
Matrix Completion With Low Gradient
Regularization. IEEE Transactions on Image
Processing, 26(9), 4311–4320.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2017.2718183
[6]. Elharrouss, O., Almaadeed, N., Al-Maadeed, S., &
Akbari, Y. (2019, December 6). Image Inpainting: A
Review. Neural Processing Letters, 51(2), 2007–
2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10163-0
[7]. Ding, D., Ram, S., & Rodriguez, J. J. (2019, April).
Image Inpainting Using Nonlocal Texture Matching
and Nonlinear Filtering. IEEE Transactions on
Image Processing, 28(4), 1705–1719.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2018.2880681
[8]. Fan, Q., & Zhang, L. (2017, September 2). A novel
patch matching algorithm for exemplar-based image
inpainting. Multimedia Tools and Applications,
77(9), 10807–10821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-
017-5077-z
[9]. K. Alilou, V., & Yaghmaee, F. (2016, March 3).
Exemplar-based image inpainting using svd-based
approximation matrix and multi-scale analysis.
Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(5), 7213–
7234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3366-6
[10]. Jiang, Y., Xu, J., Yang, B., Xu, J., & Zhu, J. (2020).
Image Inpainting Based on Generative Adversarial
Networks. IEEE Access, 8, 22884–22892.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2970169
[11]. Quan, W., Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Wang, J., &
Yan, D. M. (2022). Image Inpainting With Local and
Global Refinement. IEEE Transactions on Image
Processing, 31, 2405–2420.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2022.3152624
[12]. Sridevi, G., & Srinivas Kumar, S. (2019, January
14). Image Inpainting Based on Fractional-Order
Nonlinear Diffusion for Image Reconstruction.
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 38(8),
3802–3817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-019-
01029-w
[13]. Wang, N., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Dynamic
Selection Network for Image Inpainting. IEEE
Transactions on Image Processing, 30, 1784–1798.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2020.3048629
[14]. Liao, L., Hu, R., Xiao, J., & Wang, Z. (2019). Artist-
Net: Decorating the Inferred Content With Unified
Style for Image Inpainting. IEEE Access, 7, 36921–
36933. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2905268
IJISRT24FEB1068 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[15]. Wang, H., Jiao, L., Wu, H., & Bie, R. (2019). New
Inpainting Algorithm Based on Simplified Context
Encoders and Multi-Scale Adversarial Network.
Procedia Computer Science, 147, 254–263.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.250
[16]. Abdal, R., Zhu, P., Mitra, N. J., & Wonka, P. (2021,
May 5). StyleFlow: Attribute-conditioned
Exploration of StyleGAN-Generated Images using
Conditional Continuous Normalizing Flows. ACM
Transactions on Graphics, 40(3), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3447648
[17]. Zeng, Y., Fu, J., Chao, H., & Guo, B. (2023, July 1).
Aggregated Contextual Transformations for High-
Resolution Image Inpainting. IEEE Transactions on
Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(7), 3266–
3280. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2022.3156949
[18]. Guo, H., Hu, S., Wang, X., Chang, M. C., & Lyu, S.
(2022). Robust Attentive Deep Neural Network for
Detecting GAN-Generated Faces. IEEE Access, 10,
32574–32583.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3157297
[19]. Singh, J. M., & Ramachandra, R. (2023). Deep
Composite Face Image Attacks: Generation,
Vulnerability and Detection. IEEE Access, 11,
76468–76485.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3261247
[20]. Bhavsar, A. V., & Rajagopalan, A. N. (2012, April).
Range map superresolution-inpainting, and
reconstruction from sparse data. Computer Vision
and Image Understanding, 116(4), 572–591.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2011.12.005
[21]. Segawa, Y., Kawamoto, K., & Okamoto, K. (2018,
May 14). First-person reading activity recognition by
deep learning with synthetically generated images.
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing,
2018(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-018-0272-z
[22]. Mo, S., Lu, P., & Liu, X. (2022, October 27). AI-
Generated Face Image Identification with Different
Color Space Channel Combinations. Sensors, 22(21),
8228. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218228
[23]. Choi, J. G. (2000, December 1). Reliable watermark
detection method based on analysis of correlation.
Optical Engineering, 39(12), 3308.
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1327900
[24]. ZHAI, D., ZUO, W., DUAN, W., YU, J., & LI, T.
(2013, December 17). Image inpainting algorithm
based on double-cross curvature-driven diffusion
model. Journal of Computer Applications, 33(12),
3536–3539.
https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1087.2013.03536
[25]. Xiao, Y., & Zhao, J. (2024). Evaluating the
effectiveness of machine learning models for
detecting AI-generated art. Journal of Emerging
Investigators. https://doi.org/10.59720/23-132
[26]. Malik, A., Kuribayashi, M., Abdullahi, S. M., &
Khan, A. N. (2022). DeepFake Detection for Human
Face Images and Videos: A Survey. IEEE Access,
10, 18757–18775.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3151186
1376