tarea 10

santiago rodriguez

2023-10-25

1. efecto de nuevo medicamento en infeccion viral.

n_control <- 50
n_medicamento <- 50
prop_control <- 0.36
prop_medicamento <- 0.60
alpha <- 0.05

p_combined <- (n_control * prop_control + n_medicamento *

prop_medicamento) / (n_control + n_medicamento)
se_combined <- sqrt(p_combined * (1 - p_combined) * (1/n_control +
1/n_medicamento))
z <- (prop_medicamento - prop_control) / se_combined
critical_value <- qnorm(1 - alpha/2)

2.estaciones meteorologicas.
enero <- c(139, 122, 126, 64, 78)
abril <- c(104, 113, 100, 88, 61)
alpha <- 0.01

result <- t.test(enero, abril, paired = FALSE, alternative = "greater",

conf.level = 1 - alpha)

cat("Test Statistic:", result$statistic, "\n")

## Test Statistic: 0.7328803

cat("P-Value:", result$p.value, "\n")

## P-Value: 0.2443422

3. suero en leucemia.
con_tratamiento <- c(2.1, 5.3, 1.4, 4.6, 0.9)
sin_tratamiento <- c(1.9, 0.5, 2.8, 3.1)
alpha <- 0.01

result <- t.test(con_tratamiento, sin_tratamiento, var.equal = TRUE,

alternative = "less", conf.level = 1 - alpha)
cat("Test Statistic:", result$statistic, "\n")

## Test Statistic: 0.698986

cat("P-Value:", result$p.value, "\n")

 ## P-Value: 0.7464433

1.
p1<-0.36
p2<-0.60
p1
## [1] 0.36
p2
## [1] 0.6

NORMALIDAD n1=50=n2
n1<-50
n1*p1
## [1] 18
n1*(1-p1)
## [1] 32
n2<-50
n2*p2
## [1] 30
n2*(1-p2)
## [1] 20

son mayores a 5, por lo tanto su distribución es normal

Ho: p1 = p2, H1: p1 es diferente de p2
50/50=1 x1/50=0.36 x2/50=0.6 x1=0.3650 x2=0.650 x1=18 x2=30
pmedia<-(18+30)/(50+50)
pmedia
## [1] 0.48
qmedia<-1-pmedia
qmedia
## [1] 0.52

Estadistico de prueba
z<-(18-30)/sqrt((pmedia*qmedia)/50+(pmedia*qmedia)/50)
z
## [1] -120.0961
prop.test(c(18,30), c(50,50), conf.level = 0.95, alternative = "two.sided", correct = F)
##
## 2-sample test for equality of proportions without continuity correction
##
## data: c(18, 30) out of c(50, 50)
## X-squared = 5.7692, df = 1, p-value = 0.01631
## alternative hypothesis: two.sided
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.4301064 -0.0498936
## sample estimates:
## prop 1 prop 2
## 0.36 0.60
0.016 < 0.05 si hay evidencia para ser un buen medicamento
2.
Enero<-c(139, 122, 126, 64, 78)
Abril<-c(104, 113, 100, 88, 61)
E
## [1] 139 122 126 64 78
A
## [1] 104 113 100 88 61
d<-(E-A)
d
## [1] 35 9 26 -24 17
shapiro.test(d)
##
## Shapiro-Wilk normality test
##
## data: d
## W = 0.91387, p-value = 0.4912

0.4914 > 0.01,se acepta la hipótesis de que si es normal

HIPOTESIS Ho: E <= A, H1: E > A Ho: d = E-A<=0, H1: d = E-A>0
t.test(E,A, mu=0, alternative = "greater", conf.level = 0.01, paired = T)
##
## Paired t-test
##
## data: E and A
## t = 1.2436, df = 4, p-value = 0.1408
## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is greater than 0
## 1 percent confidence interval:
## 50.56455 Inf
## sample estimates:
## mean difference
## 12.6

0.1408 > 0.01, se acepta la hipótesis

3.
CT<-c(2.1, 5.3, 1.4, 4.6, 0.9)
ST<-c(1.9, 0.5, 2.8, 3.1)
CT
## [1] 2.1 5.3 1.4 4.6 0.9
ST
## [1] 1.9 0.5 2.8 3.1

HIPOTESIS Ho: CT <= ST H1: CT > ST, CT - ST=0

t.test(CT,ST, mu=0, alternative = "greater", conf.level = 0.01, var.equal = T)
##
## Two Sample t-test
##
## data: CT and ST
## t = 0.69899, df = 7, p-value = 0.2536
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is greater than 0
## 1 percent confidence interval:
## 4.151866 Inf
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 2.860 2.075

0.25 > 0.01 el suero no es efectivo para el tratamiento.