You are on page 1of 6

Introduction: Debates are a cornerstone of democratic discourse, allowing for the exchange of ideas in a

structured and respectful environment. In the Philippines, understanding the legal and ethical
boundaries within which debates operate is crucial for participants and organizers alike.

Legal Overview: Philippine law, under the Constitution, guarantees freedom of speech and expression.
However, this freedom is not absolute and is subject to certain restrictions, particularly when it comes
to slander, libel, and public order. In a debate setting, it's important that these legal boundaries are
respected. The laws related to defamation, intellectual property, and public conduct provide a
framework that guides what can and cannot be legally expressed in a debate.

Practical Advice:

Stay Informed: Be aware of the legal boundaries regarding freedom of speech in the Philippines.

Respectful Communication: Always maintain a respectful tone and avoid personal attacks during
debates.

Fact-Check: Ensure that your arguments are factually accurate and not misleading.

Avoid Defamation: Be cautious of making statements that could be considered slanderous or libelous.

Intellectual Honesty: Acknowledge and credit the original sources of your information and arguments.

While debates are essential for a healthy democratic society, they must be conducted within the
framework of the law. Understanding and respecting legal and ethical guidelines ensures that debates
contribute positively to society without infringing on the rights of others.

In conclusion, ethical argumentation is not just a skill but a responsibility. As we navigate complex
issues, let's commit to honesty, respect, and a genuine desire to understand and be understood. Only
then can we hope for a discourse that enriches rather than divides.

ewsUpdated 2y

Related

What are some signs that someone respects you?

There is a natural tuning into each other - a strong level of attention, of presence.

By “natural” I mean I don’t have to constantly demand it.


Everything is tinged with a fundamental kindness - not just in how we treat each other but in how we
treat those around us.

We are considerate of each other.

There is a sense of inclusion.

We believe in each other.

We observe each other’s boundaries.

If something is not clear, we ask. Assuming that I know without asking infringes on your preferences.

If I expect something I state it. Expecting you will guess is not reasonable.

We listen to each other.

We talk through things together.

We do what we say we are going to do. Follow through is a display of respect, for others but also for
myself.

We tell the truth, even when it’s hard.

We feel safe, even when we disagree.

We feel safe, even when our opinions or beliefs are different.

We feel safe, even when we mess something up.


We hold difficult conversations.

We trust each other.

We value and are grateful for the other person - the opposite of taking each other for granted. Gratitude
is respect in the most elegant attire.

If something isn’t right, we talk about it.

If we fight, the intent is to understand, not to win. Being deliberately hurtful is the absence of respect.

There is accountability - an ease in saying “that was me. I am responsible.”

rector of Surgical Education Author has 419 answers and 271.4K answer views4y

Related

What are some ways to conduct a respectful, effective debate?


Start by being realistic. Some people either cannot or will not engage in that manner. Not much you can
do about that.

Going into an effective discussion you should be armed with two things. First, know precisely which
assumptions you are making which you are treating as being objectively true. Every argument makes
assumptions about truth. Second, be sure that the conclusions you are making follow inevitably by
sound logic based on your truth premises.

Be a good listener. It will both set a respectful tone, and give you the opportunity to identify the truth
assumptions and logic application of the other debater. Then you decide where to challenge: the
assumption of truth, or the use of faulty logic.

At no time is it personal. It is about ideas, not personalities.

orks at Free University of Brussels (ULB)Author has 1K answers and 1M answer views5y

Related

What are some ways to conduct a respectful, effective debate?

It depends on the will of the people engaged in the debate. If their interest is genuine, courtesy will
prevail, and everyone will be happy if it ends by either an agreement or a mutual understanding, or an
agreement on what principle(s) they might differ on. Usually, and a bit theoretically, this will happen in
between persons having the scientific attitude, which is modesty, and the courage, and the absence of
vanity, making them able to accept to be shown wrong.

If, on the contrary, the “debate” is between person claiming to know the truth, then, unless they have
the same position, (and in that case there is no real debate at all), the insult, i.e. the violence, will soon
arrive.

When you are the one engaged in a debate, you cannot always known in advance, if your interlocutor
want a real debate, or just mock you or something, as some people can be gifted in “looking
reasonable”, and use all sort of subtle rhetorical tricks to make you look as a fool. That can be a case of
moral harassment, and you might better leave the discussion, and not come up with argument, because
those claiming to know the truth usually are immune against any form of courteous argumentation.
Your courtesy will make them even more agressive.
To sum up, choose well you interlocutor, as there is no rule for a respectful debate other than finding
respectful and good willing people having sincere interest in some question. The others only try to
impose their view, in one way or another.

as 426 answers and 772.8K answer views4y

Related

What are some ways to conduct a respectful, effective debate?

I am a big fan of this concept.

The zeroth principle is not to play chess with Pigeons.

Then:

1. Make up your mind that you will respect your opponent.

2.Decide that you will treat them the same whether they are correct or incorrect about a topic. This is
actually more important than the outcome of 99.9% of debates. Whatever happens, they are your
friends, family, neighbours, colleagues, fellow citizens.

Never, ever forget that.

The greasy thrill of denigrating an opponent is just bully-porn for low-level sadists. Don't sink to it. Being
right doesn't mean you get to be a prick

3. Respect the institution of free speech, and accept that it has rules just like boxing.

There are fair blows and foul. The logical fallacies are fouls. So are many sneaky rhetorical tricks that
come from deliberately imprecise language and moral posturing. Don't do these things. Being right
doesn't mean that you can cut corners in your reasoning. And there are no virtuous lies.

4. Really try to understand the other side before you argue with them. Avoid the tendency to ascribe
bad motives - or indeed ANY motives- to their beliefs. Try instead to test the truth value of the claims
they make.
This is tricky, because it presupposes that you actually do understand the claims they are making. Try as
hard as you can to be sure that you understand precisely what they do claim, such that you're resting
the claim and not it's strawman cousin.

If you do these things, I cannot promise that you will have a great debate but it's quite possible that
both you and your opponent will both learn something. Even accurately learning the claims of a belief
that you consider wrong involves learning and communication, and that beats hell out of name calling
and moral posturing.

Show Respect for the Electorate:

Provide substantive answers

Be honest, fair, and civil in all of your responses

Only make promises that are consistent, capable of being achieved, and within the jurisdiction of the
office being sought

Show Respect for your Opponents:

Criticize policies and the record of your opponent-not the opponent personally

Refrain from name calling or other insults

Don’t engage in irrelevant attacks against either your opponent or your opponent’s family or associates

Show Respect for the Process:

Don’t interrupt or shout down fellow candidates or moderator

Answer the question asked

Stay within allotted time limits

You might also like