You are on page 1of 5

A Review on Estimation of Particulate Matter from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Data, Methods, and...

695

Engel-cox, J.A., Holloman, C.H., Coutant, B.W., Hoff, R.M.: Qualitative Pollution, 215, 195–202 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.
and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for re- 2016.05.003.
gional and urban scale air quality. Atmos. Environ. 38, 2495–2509 Guo, Y., Feng, N., Christopher, S.A., Kang, P., Zhan, F.B., Hong, S.:
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.039 Satellite remote sensing of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air quality
Engel-cox, J.A., Hoff, R.M., Rogers, R., Dimmick, F., Rush, C., over Beijing using MODIS. Int. J. Remote Sens. 35, 6522–6544
Szykman, J.J., Al-saadi, J., Chu, D.A., Zell, E.R.: Integrating lidar (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.958245
and satellite optical depth with ambient monitoring for 3- Gupta, P. Particulate Matter Air Quality Assessment Over South East
dimensional particulate characterization. Atmos. Environ. 40(40), United States using Satellite and Ground Measurements. ProQuest
8056–8067 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.039 Dissertations Publishing, 3338650. PhD Thesis. The University of
Engel-cox, J., Thi, N., Oanh, K., Van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R.V., Zell, Alabama in Huntsville, Alabama (2008).
E.: Toward the next generation of air quality monitoring: particulate Gupta, P., Christopher, S.A. An evaluation of Terra-MODIS sampling for
matter. Atmos. Environ. 80, 584–590 (2013). https://doi.org/10. monthly and annual particulate matter air quality assessment over
1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.016 the Southeastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 42, 6465–6471
Farahat, A.: Comparative analysis of MODIS, MISR, and AERONET (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.04.044
climatology over the Middle East and North Africa. Ann. Geophys. Gupta, P., Christopher, S.A.: Particulate matter air quality assessment
37, 49–64 (2019) using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: mul-
Gao, L., Li, J., Chen, L., Zhang, L., Heidinger, A.K.: Retrieval and val- tiple regression approach. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114, 1–13
idation of atmospheric aerosol optical depth from AVHRR over (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011496
China. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 54(11), 6280–6291 Gupta, P., Gadhavi, H., Jayaraman, A.: Aerosol optical depth variation
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2016.2574756 observed using sun-photometer over Indore. Indian J. Radio Space
Gao, L., Chen, L., Li, J., Heidinger, A.K., Xu, X., Qin, S.: A long-term Phys. 32, 229–237 (2003)
historical aerosol optical depth data record (1982 ~ 2011) over Gupta, P., Christopher, S.A., Wang, J., Gehrig, R., Lee, Y., Kumar, N.:
China from AVHRR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57(5), Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter and air quality assess-
2467–2480 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2018.2873944 ment over global cities. Atmos. Environ. 40(30), 5880–5892 (2006).
Geng, G., Zhang, Q., Martin, R.V., Van Donkelaar, A., Huo, H., Che, H., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.016
Lin, J., He, K.: Remote sensing of environment estimating long-term Gupta, P., Khan, M.N., Silva, A., Patadia, F.: Atmospheric pollution
PM2.5 concentrations in China using satellite-based aerosol optical quantity and quality of the data for air quality monitoring. Atmos.
depth and a chemical transport model. Remote Sens. Environ. Pollut. Res. 4, 43–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2013.005
166(1), 262–270 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.05.016 Gupta, P., Levy, R.C., Mattoo, S., Remer, L.A., Munchak, L.A.: A sur-
Ghotbi, S., Sotoudeheian, S., Arhami, M.: Estimating urban ground-level face reflectance scheme for retrieving aerosol optical depth over
PM10 using MODIS 3km AOD product and meteorological param- urban surfaces in MODIS Dark Target retrieval algorithm 3293–
eters from WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 141, 333–346 (2016). 3308. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9, 3293–3308 (2016). https://doi.org/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.057 10.5194/amt-9-3293-2016
Girolamo, L.D., Bond, T.C., Bramer, D., Diner, D.J., Fettinger, F., Kahn, Gupta, P., Remer, L.A., Levy, R.C., Mattoo, S. Validation of MODIS
R.A., Martonchik, J.V., Ramana, M.V., Ramanathan, V., Rasch, 3km land aerosol optical depth from NASA’s EOS Terra and Aqua
P.J.: Analysis of Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) missions. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 3145–3159 (2018). https://doi.
aerosol optical depths over greater India during winter 2001–2004. org/10.5194/amt-11-3145-2018
Geophys. Res. Lett. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1–5 (2004). https://doi.org/10. Hagolle, O., Huc, M., Pascual, D.V., Dedieu, G.: A multi-temporal and
1029/2004GL021273 multi-spectral method to estimate aerosol optical thickness over
Goloub, P., Tanr, D., Deuz, J.L.: Validation of the first algorithm applied land, for the atmospheric correction of FormoSat-2, LandSat,
for deriving the aerosol properties over the ocean using the VENS and Sentinel-2 images. Remote Sens. 7(3), 2668–2691
POLDER/ADEOS measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70302668
Sens. 37(3), 1586–1596 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/36.763270 Hauser, A., Oesch, D., Wunderle, S.: Retrieval of Aerosol Optical Depth
Greed, G., Haywood, J.M., Milton, S., Keil, A., Christopher, S., Gupta, (AOD) using NOAA AVHRR data in an Alpine Environment. Proc.
P., Highwood, E.J.: Aerosol optical depths over North Africa: 2. SPIE 5235, Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere VIII,
Modeling and model validation. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D00C05 (16 February 2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.511045.
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009457 Hauser, A., Oesch, D., Foppa, N., Wunderle, S.: NOAA AVHRR derived
Green, M., Kondragunta, S., Ciren, P., Xu, C.: Comparison of GOES and aerosol optical depth over land. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 110, 1–11
MODIS Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) to Aerosol Robotic Network (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005439
(AERONET) AOD and IMPROVE PM2.5 mass at Bondville, He, Q., Zhang, M., Huang, B.: Spatio-temporal variation and impact
Illinois. J. Air Waste Manag. 59, 37–41 (2009). https://doi.org/10. factors analysis of satellite- based aerosol optical depth over China
3155/1047-3289.59.9.1082 from 2002 to 2015. Atmos. Environ. 129, 79–90 (2016). https://doi.
Guo, J., Li, Y., Cohen, J. B., Li, J., Chen, D., Xu, H.,Liu, L., Yin, J., Hu, org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.002
K., Zhai, P.: Shift in the temporal trend in boundary layer height Herman, J.R.: Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from
trend in China using long‐term (1979–2016) radiosonde data. Nimbus. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, 16911–16922 (1997)
Geophysical Research Letters. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1029/ Herman, J.R., Torres, O., Hsu, N.C., Herman, J.R., Holben, B.N., Tanre,
2019GL082666. D., Eck, T.F.: Comparisons of the TOMS aerosol index with Sun-
Guo, J., Zhang, X.-y., Che, H., Gong, S., An, X., Cao, C., Guang, J., photometer aerosol optical thickness: results and applications com-
Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, X.-c., Xue, M., Li, X.: Correlation parisons of the TOMS aerosol index with sun-photometer aerosol
between PM concentrations and aerosol optical depth in eastern optical thickness: results and applications. J. Geophys. Res.
China. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5876–5886 (2009). https://doi.org/10. 104(D6), 6269–6279 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1029/
1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.026 1998JD200086
Guo, L.C., Zhang, Y., Lin, H., Zeng, W., Liu, T., Xiao, J., Rutherford, S., Hsu, N.C., Tsay, S.C., King, M.D., Herman, J.R.: Aerosol properties over
You, J., Ma, W. The washout effects of rainfall on atmospheric bright reflecting source regions. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
particulate pollution in two Chinese cities. Environmental 42, 557–569 (2004)

Korean Meteorological Society


696 A. K. Ranjan et al.

Hsu, N.C., Jeong, M.-J., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A.M., Hansell, R., of spatiotemporal PM2.5 exposures in the Mid-Atlantic States.
Seftor, C.S., Huang, J., Tsay, S.-C.: Enhanced deep blue aerosol Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(21), 11913–11921 (2012). https://doi.
retrieval algorithm: the second generation. J. Geophys. Res. org/10.1021/es302673e
Atmos. 118(16), 9296–9315 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd. Knapp, K., Haar, T., Kaufman, Y.: Aerosol optical depth retrieval from
50712 GOES-8: uncertainty study and retrieval validation over South
Hsu, N.C., Lee, J., Sayer, A.M., Carletta, N., Tucker, C.J., Holben, B.N.: America. J. Geophys. Res. 107(D7), 4055 (2002). https://doi.org/
Retrieving near-global aerosol loading over land and ocean from 10.1029/2001JD000505
AVHRR. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 9968–9989 (2017). Koelemeijer, R.B.A.Ã., Homan, C.D., Matthijsen, J.: Comparison of spa-
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026932 tial and temporal variations of aerosol optical thickness and partic-
Hoff, R. M., & Christopher, S. A.: Remote Sensing of Particulate ulate matter over Europe. Atmos. Environ. 40(27), 5304–5315
Pollution from Space: Have We Reached the Promised Land? (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.044
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 59(6), 645– Kong, L., Xin, J., Zhang, W., Wang, Y.: The empirical correlations be-
675 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.10.1130 tween PM 2. 5, PM 10 and AOD in the Beijing metropolitan region
Hu, X., Waller, L.A., Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., Al-Hamdan, M.Z., and the PM2.5, PM10 distributions retrieved by MODIS. Environ.
Crosson, W.L., Liu, Y.: Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentra- Pollut. 216, 350–360 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.
tions in the Southeastern United States using MAIAC AOD re- 05.085
trievals and a two-stage model. Remote Sens. Environ. 140, 220– Kumar, N., Chu, A., Foster, A.: An empirical relationship between PM2.5
232 (2014) and aerosol optical depth in Delhi Metropolitan. Atmos. Environ.
Hu, X., Belle, J.H., Meng, X., Wildani, A., Waller, L.A., Strickland, M.J., 41(21), 4492–4503 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.
Liu, Y.: Estimating PM2.5 concentrations in the conterminous 2007.01.046
United States Using the random forest approach. Environ. Sci. Kumar, N., Foster, D.A.: Air Quality Interventions and Spatial Dynamics
Technol. 51(12), 6936–6944 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. of Air Pollution in Delhi. Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag. 4, 85–111
est.7b01210 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2009.026886
Huene, W.V.H., Freitag, M., Burrows, J.B.: Retrieval of aerosol optical Lary, D.J., Lary, T., Sattler, B.: Using machine learning to estimate global
thickness over land surfaces from top-of-atmosphere radiance. J. PM2.5 for environmental health studies. Environ. Health Insights.
Geophys. Res. 108(D9), 4260 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1029/ 9(s1), (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/EHI.S15664
2001JD002018
Lee, H.J., Liu, Y., Coull, B.A., Schwartz, J., Koutrakis, P.: A novel
Jethva, H., Chand, D., Torres, O., Gupta, P., Lyapustin, A., Patadia, F.,
calibration approach of MODIS AOD data to predict PM 2.5 con-
Goddard, N., Flight, S.: Agricultural burning and air quality over
centrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11(15), 7991–8002 (2011). https://
Northern India: a synergistic analysis using NASA’ s A-train satel-
doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7991-2011
lite data and ground measurements. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18,
Levy, R.C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L.A., Remer, L.A., Sayer, A.M., Hsu,
1756–1773 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0583
N.C.: The collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and
Joharestani, Z. M., Cao, C., Bashir, B., Ni, X., Talebiesfandarani, S.,
ocean. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 6, 2989–3034 (2013). https://doi.org/
2019. PM2.5 prediction based on random forest, XGBoost, and
10.5194/amtd-6-159-2013
deep learning using multisource remote sensing data. Atmosphere.
Levy, R.C., Munchak, L.A., Mattoo, S., Patadia, F., Remer, L.A., Holz,
10(7), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10070373
R.E.: Towards a long-term global aerosol optical depth record: ap-
Joo, H., Coull, B.A., Bell, M.L., Koutrakis, P.: Use of satellite-based
plying a consistent aerosol retrieval algorithm to MODIS and
aerosol optical depth and spatial clustering to predict ambient
VIIRS-observed reflectance. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8(10), 4083–
PM2.5 concentrations. Environ. Res. 118, 8–15 (2012). https://doi.
4110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4083-2015
org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.06.011
Jung, C., Hwang, B., Chen, W.: Incorporating long-term satellite-based Li, L.: A robust deep learning approach for spatiotemporal estimation of
aerosol optical depth, localized land use data, and meteorological satellite AOD and PM2.5. Remote Sens. 12(2), 264 (2020). https://
variables to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in Taiwan doi.org/10.3390/rs12020264
from 2005 to 2015. Environ. Pollut. 237, 1000–1010 (2018). https:// Li, Z., Zhao, X., Kahn, R., Mishchenko, M., Remer, L., Lee, K., Wang,
doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.016 M., Laszlo, I., Nakajima, T.: Uncertainties in satellite remote sensing
Just, A.C., Wright, R.O., Schwartz, J., Coull, B.A., Baccarelli, A.A., Mar, of aerosols and impact on monitoring its long-term trend: a review
M., Moody, E., Wang, Y., Lyapustin, A., Kloog, I.: Using high- and perspective. Ann. Geophys. 27, 2755–2770 (2009). https://doi.
resolution satellite aerosol optical depth to estimate daily PM2.5 geo- org/10.5194/angeo-27-2755-2009
graphical distribution in Mexico City. Environ. Sci. Technol. Li, J., Carlson, B.E., Lacis, A.A.: How well do satellite AOD observa-
49(14), 8576–8584 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00859 tions represent the spatial and temporal variability of PM2.5 concen-
Kahn, R., Banerjee, P., Mcdonald, D., Diner, D.J.: Sensitivity of tration for the United States? Atmos. Environ. 102, 260–273 (2015).
multiangle imaging to aerosol optical depth and to pure-particle size https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.010
distribution and composition over ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Li, Z., Roy, D.P., Zhang, H.K., Vermote, E.F., Huang, H.: Evaluation of
103(D24), 32195–32213 (1998) Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A aerosol optical depth retrievals across
Kaufman, Y.J., Tanre, D., Gordon, H.R., Nakajima, T., Lenoble, J., Chinese cities and implications for medium spatial resolution urban
Frouin, R., Grassl, H., Herman, B.M., King, M.D., Teillet, P.M.: aerosol monitoring. Remote Sens. 11(2), 122 (2019). https://doi.org/
Passive remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol and atmospheric 10.3390/rs11020122
correction for the aerosol effect. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, Liang, F., Xiao, Q., Gu, D., Xu, M., Tian, L., Guo, Q., Wu, Z., Pan, X.,
16815–16830 (1997) Liu, Y.: Satellite-based short- and long-term exposure to PM2.5 and
Kloog, I., Koutrakis, P., Coull, B.A., Joo, H., Schwartz, J.: Assessing adult mortality in urban Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 242, 492–
temporally and spatially resolved PM2.5 exposures for epidemiolog- 499 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.097
ical studies using satellite aerosol optical depth measurements. Liaw, A., Wiener, M.: Classification and regression by random forest. R
Atmos. Environ. 45, 6267–6275 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. News. 2, 18–22 (2002)
atmosenv.2011.08.066 Lin, C., Li, Y., Yuan, Z., Lau, A.K.H., Li, C., Fung, J.C.H.: Remote
Kloog, I., Nordio, F., Coull, B.A., Schwartz, J.: Incorporating local land Sensing of Environment Using satellite remote sensing data to esti-
use regression and satellite aerosol optical depth in a hybrid model mate the high-resolution distribution of ground-level PM2.5. Remote

Korean Meteorological Society


A Review on Estimation of Particulate Matter from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Data, Methods, and... 697

Sens. Environ. 156, 117–128 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse. Patadia, F., Levy, R.C., Mattoo, S.: Correcting for trace gas absorption
2014.09.015 when retrieving aerosol optical depth from satellite observations of
Liu, Y.: New directions: satellite driven PM2.5 exposure models to sup- reflected shortwave radiation. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11(6), 3205–
port targeted particle pollution health effects research. Atmos. 3219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3205-2018
Environ. 68, 52–53 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv. Péré, J., Pont, V., Mallet, M., Bessagnet, B.: Mapping of PM10 surface
2012.11.043 concentrations derived from satellite observations of aerosol optical
Liu, Y., Park, R.J., Jacob, D.J., Li, Q., Kilaru, V., Sarnat, J.A.: Mapping thickness over South-Eastern France. Atmos. Res. 91, 1–8 (2009).
annual mean ground-level PM2.5 concentrations using multiangle https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.05.001
imaging spectroradiometer aerosol optical thickness over the contig- Prados, A.I., Kondragunta, S., Ciren, P., Knapp, K.R.: GOES Aerosol/
uous United States. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 109(D22), (2004). Smoke Product (GASP) over North America: comparisons to
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005025 AERONET and MODIS observations. J. Geophys. Res.
Liu, Y., Sarnat, J.A., Kilaru, V., Jacob, D.J., Koutrakis, P.: Estimating 112(D15), (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007968
ground-level PM2.5 in the eastern United States using satellite re- Prasad, S., Gupta, R.K.: Estimation and evaluation of aerosol optical
mote sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 3269–3278 (2005) depth using NOAA AVHRR data. Adv. Space Res. 22(11), 1525–
Martin, R.V.: Satellite remote sensing of surface air quality. Atmos. 1528 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00020-4
Environ. 42(34), 7823–7843 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Prasad, A.K., Singh, R.P.: Comparison of MISR-MODIS aerosol optical
atmosenv.2008.07.018. depth over the Indo-Gangetic basin during the winter and summer
Mei, L.L., Xue, Y., Kokhanovsky, A.A., De Leeuw, G., Burrows, J.P.: seasons (2000–2005). Remote Sens. Environ. 107(1–2), 109–119
Retrieval of aerosol optical depth over land surfaces from AVHRR (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.026
data 2411–2420. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7(8), 2411–2420 (2014). Prasad, K., Ellicott, E., Badarinath, K.V.S., Vermote, E.: MODIS de-
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2411-2014 rived fi re characteristics and aerosol optical depth variations dur-
Mei, L., Strandgren, J., Rozanov, V., Vountas, M., Burrows, J.P., Wang, ing the agricultural residue burning season, north India. Environ.
Y.: A study of the impact of spatial resolution on the estimation of Pollut. 159, 1560–1569 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.
particle matter concentration from the aerosol optical depth retrieved 2011.03.001
from satellite observations. Int. J. Remote Sens. 40, 7084–7112 Ranjan, A. K., Patra, A. K., Gorai, A. K.: Effect of lockdown due to
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1601279 SARS COVID-19 on aerosol optical depth (AOD) over urban and
Mirzaei, M., Bertazzon, S., Couloigner, I.: OLS and GWR LUR models mining regions in India. Science of The Total Environment, 745,
of wildfire smoke using remote sensing and spatiotemporal data in 141024 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141024.
Alberta. Spat Knowl Inf Can. 7(2), 3 (2018)
Ramachandran, G., Adgate, J.L., Pratt, G.C., Sexton, K.: Characterizing
Mishchenko, M.I., Geogdzhayev, I.V., Rossow, W.B., Cairns, B.,
indoor and outdoor 15 min average PM2.5 concentrations in urban
Carlson, B.E., Lacis, A.A., Liu, L., Travis, L.D.: Long-term satellite
neighborhoods. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 37, 33–45 (2003)
record reveals likely recent aerosol trend. Sci. Sci. 315(5818), 1543–
Reid, C.E., Jerrett, M., Petersen, M.L., Pfister, G.G., Morefield, P.E.,
1543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136709
Tager, I.B., Raffuse, S.M., Balmes, J.R.: Spatiotemporal prediction
Ni, X., Cao, C., Zhou, Y., Cui, X., Singh, R.P.: Spatio-temporal pattern
of fine particulate matter during the 2008 Northern California wild-
estimation of PM2.5 in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on
fires using machine learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(6), 3887–
MODIS AOD and meteorological data using the back propagation
3896 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/es505846r
neural network. Atmosphere. 9, 105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/
atmos9030105 Remer, L.A., Mattoo, S., Levy, R.C., Munchak, L.A.: MODIS 3-km
Nordio, F., Kloog, I., Coull, B.A., Chudnovsky, A., Grillo, P., Alberto, P., aerosol product: algorithm and global perspective. Atmos. Meas.
Baccarelli, A.A., Schwartz, J.: Estimating spatio-temporal resolved Tech. 6(7), 1829–1844 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-
PM 10 aerosol mass concentrations using MODIS satellite data and 1829-2013
land use regression over Lombardy, Italy. Atmos. Environ. 74, 227– Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G.B., O’Dowd, C.D., Kulmala, M.,
236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.043 Fuzzi, S., Reissell, A., Andreae, M.O.: Flood or drought: how do
Othman, N., Mat-Jafri, M.Z., San, L.H.: Estimating particulate matter aerosols affect precipitation? Science. 321(5894), 1309–1313
concentration over arid region using satellite remote sensing: a case (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606
study in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Mod. Appl. Sci. 4, 11131–11142 Roy, A., Jivani, A., Parekh, B.: Estimation of PM10 distribution using
(2010a) Landsat 7 ETM+ remote sensing data. Int. J. Adv. Remote Sens.
Othman, N., Mat-Jafri, M.Z., San, L.H.: Estimating particulate matter GIS. 6(1), 2246–2252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.23953/cloud.
concentration over arid region using satellite remote sensing: a case ijarsg.284
study in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Mod. Appl. Sci. 4, 11–21 (2010b) Saleh, S.H.A., Hasan, G.: Estimation of PM10 concentration using
Paciorek, C., Liu, Y., Moreno-Macias, H., Kondragunta, S.: Spatio- ground measurements and Landsat 8 OLI satellite image. J.
temporal associations between GOES aerosol optical depth re- Geophys. Remote Sens. 3(2), 120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.
trievals and ground-level PM2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5800– 4172/2169-0049.100012
5806 (2008) Saraswat, I., Mishra, R.K., Kumar, A.: Remote sensing applications:
Park, S., Shin, M., Im, J., Song, C.-K., Choi, M., Kim, J., Lee, S., Park, society and environment estimation of PM10 concentration from
R., Kim, J., Lee, D.-W., Kim, S.-K.: Estimation of ground-level Landsat 8 OLI satellite imagery over. Remote Sens. Appl.: Soc.
particulate matter concentrations through the synergistic use of sat- Environ. 8, 251–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.
ellite observations and process-based models over South Korea. 10.006
Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19(2), 1097–1113 (2019). https://doi.org/10. Schaap, M., Timmermans, R.M.A., Koelemeijer, R.B.A.: Evaluation of
5194/acp-19-1097-2019 MODIS aerosol optical thickness over Europe using sun photometer
Park, S., Lee, J., Im, J., Song, C.-K., Choi, M., Kim, J., Lee, S., Park, R., observations. Atmos. Environ. 42(9), 2187–2197 (2008). https://doi.
Kim, S.-M., Yoon, J., Lee, D.-W., Quackenbush, L.J.: Estimation of org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.044
spatially continuous daytime particulate matter concentrations under Schaap, M., Apituley, A., Timmermans, R.M.A., Koelemeijer, R.B.A.,
all sky conditions through the synergistic use of satellite-based AOD De Leeuw, G.: Exploring the relation between aerosol optical depth
and numerical models. Sci. Total Environ. 713, 136516 (2020). and PM2.5 at Cabauw, the Netherlands. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 909–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136516 925 (2009)

Korean Meteorological Society


698 A. K. Ranjan et al.

Shaw, N., Gorai, A.K.: Study of aerosol optical depth using satellite data Wang, J., Xu, X., Spurr, R., Wang, Y., Drury, E.: Improved algorithm for
(MODIS Aqua) over Indian Territory and its relation to particulate MODIS satellite retrievals of aerosol optical thickness over land in
matter concentration. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 22, 265–279 (2020). dusty atmosphere: implications for air quality monitoring in China.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0198-8 Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 2575–2583 (2010). https://doi.org/10.
Shin, M., Kang, Y., Park, S., Im, J., Yoo, C., Quackenbush, L.J.: 1016/j.rse.2010.05.034
Estimating ground-level particulate matter concentrations using Weber, S. A., Engel-Cox, J. A., Hoff, R. M., Prados, A. I., Zhang, H.: An
satellite-based data: a review. GISci. Remote Sens. 57(2), 174–189 improved method for estimating surface fine particle concentrations
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2019.1703288 using seasonally adjusted satellite aerosol optical depth. Journal of
Sinha, P.R., Gupta, P., Kaskaoutis, D.G., Sahu, L.K., Nagendra, N., the Air & Waste Management Association, 60(5), 574–585 (2010).
Manchanda, R.K., Kumar, Y.B., Sreenivasan, S.: Estimation of par- https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.5.574.
ticulate matter from satellite- and ground-based observations over Weber, S.A., Insaf, T.Z., Hall, E.S., Talbot, T.O., Huff, A.K.: Assessing
Hyderabad, India. Int. J. Remote Sens. 36, 6192–6213 (2015). the impact of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on respiratory-
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1112929 cardiovascular chronic diseases in the New York City
Sorek-hamer, M., Strawa, A.W., Chat, R.B., Esswein, R., Cohen, A., Metropolitan area using Hierarchical Bayesian Model estimates.
Broday, D.M.: Improved retrieval of PM2.5 from satellite data prod- Environ. Res. 151, 399–409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ucts using non-linear methods. Environ. Pollut. 182, 417–423 envres.2016.07.012
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.002 Wei, J., Huang, B., Sun, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Bilal, M.: A simple and
Sowden, M., Mueller, U., Blake, D.: Review of surface particulate mon- universal aerosol retrieval algorithm for Landsat series images over
itoring of dust events using geostationary satellite remote sensing. complex surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 13338–13355
Atmos. Environ. 183, 154–164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026922
atmosenv.2018.04.020 Weizhen, H., Zhengqiang, L., Yuhuan, Z., Hua, X., Ying, Z., Kaitao, L.,
Srivastava, P., Dey, S., Agarwal, P., Basil, G.: Aerosol characteristics Donghui, L., Peng, W., Yan, M.: Using support vector regression to
over Delhi national capital region: a satellite view. Int. J. Remote predict PM10 and PM2.5. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 17,
Sens. 35, 5036–5052 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161. 012268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012268
2014.934404 World Health Organization (WHO) (2020). Air Pollution. (https://
Srivastava, A., Saran, S.: Comprehensive study on AOD trends over the www.who.int/airpollution/en/). Accessed 7 Jan 2020
Indian subcontinent: a statistical approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38, Wu, Y., Guo, J., Zhang, X., Tian, X., Zhang, J.: Synergy of satellite and
5127–5149 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017. ground based observations in estimation of particulate matter in
1323284 eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 433, 20–30 (2012). https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.033
Tiwari, S., Srivastava, A.K., Bisht, D.S., Bano, T., Singh, S., Behura, S.,
Wu, X., Wang, Y., He, S., Wu, Z.: PM2:5/PM10 ratio prediction based on
Srivastava, M.K., Chate, D.M., Padmanabhamurty, B.: Black car-
a long short-term memory neural network in Wuhan, China. Geosci.
bon and chemical characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 at an urban site
Model Dev. 13(3), 1499–1511 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-
of North India. J. Atmos. Chem. 62, 193–209 (2009). https://doi.org/
13-1499-2020
10.1007/s10874-010-9148-z
Xin, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Gong, C., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Gao, W.: The
Torres, O., Bhartia, P.K., Herman, J.R., Sinyuk, A., Ginoux, P., Holben,
empirical relationship between the PM2.5 concentration and aerosol
B.: A long-term record of aerosol optical depth from TOMS obser-
optical depth over the background of North China from 2009 to
vations and comparison to AERONET measurements. J. Atmos.
2011. Atmos. Res. 138, 179–188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Sci. 59, 398–413 (2002)
atmosres.2013.11.001
Twomey, S., 1997. The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of Xu, Y., Ho, H.C., Wong, M.S., Deng, C., Shi, Y., Chan, T.-C., Knudby,
clouds. J. Atmos. Sci. 34(7), 1149–1152. https://doi.org/10.1175/ A.: Evaluation of machine learning techniques with multiple remote
1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2 sensing datasets in estimating monthly concentrations of ground-
Van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R.V., Brauer, M., Kahn, R., Levy, R., level PM2.5. Environ. Pollut. 242, 1417–1426 (2018). https://doi.
Verduzco, C.: Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.029
concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: develop- Xue, Y., He, X., Leeuw, G.D., Mei, L., Che, Y., Rippin, W.: Long-time
ment and application. Environ. Health Perspect. 118(6), 847–855 series aerosol optical depth retrieval from AVHRR data over land in
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901623 North China and Central Europe. Remote Sens. Environ. 198, 471–
Veihelmann, B., Levelt, P.F., Stammes, P., Veefkind, J.P.: Simulation 489 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.036
study of the aerosol information content in OMI spectral reflectance Xue, T., Zheng, Y., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Li, X., Zhu, T., Zhang, Q.:
measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 3115–3127 (2007). https:// Spatiotemporal continuous estimates of PM2.5 concentrations in
doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3115-2007 China, 2000–2016: a machine learning method with inputs from
Vermote, E.F., Tanre, D., Deuze, J.L., Herman, M., Morcette, J.-J.: satellites, chemical transport model, and ground observations.
Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: Environ. Int. 123, 345–357 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
an overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 35(3), 675–686 envint.2018.11.075
(1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/36.581987 Yang, Q., Yuan, Q., Yue, L., Li, T., Shen, H.: The relationships between
Vidot, J., Santer, R., Ramon, D.: Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) PM2.5 and aerosol optical depth (AOD) in mainland China: about
estimation from SeaWiFS imagery. J. Geophys. Res. 112(D6), and behind the spatio-temporal variations. Environ. Pollut. 248,
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006737 526–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.071
Wallace, J., Kanaroglou, P.: An investigation of air pollution in southern Yao, F., Si, M., Li, W., Wu, J.: Science of the total environment a mul-
Ontario, Canada, with MODIS and MISR aerosol data. IEEE Int. tidimensional comparison between MODIS and VIIRS AOD in es-
Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss. timating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations over a heavily polluted
2007.4423805 region in China. Sci. Total Environ. 15(618), 819–828 (2017).
Wang, J., Christopher, S.A.: Intercomparison between satellite-derived https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.209
aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: implications for air quality Yap, X.Q., Hashim, M.: A robust calibration approach for PM10 predic-
studies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(21), 2095 (2003). https://doi.org/10. tion from MODIS aerosol optical depth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13,
1029/2003gl018174 3517–3526 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-31483-2012

Korean Meteorological Society


A Review on Estimation of Particulate Matter from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Data, Methods, and... 699

You, W., Zang, Z., Pan, X., Zhang, L., Chen, D.: Estimating PM2.5 in observation. Remote Sens. Environ. 160, 252–262 (2015). https://
Xian, China using aerosol optical depth: a comparison between the doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.005
MODIS and MISR retrieval models. Sci. Total Environ. 505, 1156– Zhang, H., Hoff, R.M., Engel-cox, J.A., Zhang, H., Hoff, R.M., Engel-
1165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.024 cox, J.A.: The relation between moderate resolution imaging
You, W., Zang, Z., Zhang, L., Zhang, M., Pan, X., Li, Y., 2016a. A spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 over
nonlinear model for estimating ground-level PM10 concentration the United States: a geographical comparison by U. S. environmen-
in Xi’an using MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval. Atmos. Res. tal protection agency regions. J. Air Waste Manag. 59(11), 1358–
168, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.09.008 1369 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.11.1358.
You, W., Zang, Z., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Wang, W., 2016b. Estimating Zhang, Y., Bocquet, M., Mallet, V., Seigneur, C., Baklanov, A.: Real-
national-scale ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in China using time air quality forecasting, part I: history, techniques, and current
geographically weighted regression based on MODIS and MISR status. Atmos. Environ. 60, 632–655 (2012). https://doi.org/10.
AOD. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23(9), 8327–8338. https://doi. 1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.031
org/10.1007/s11356-015-6027-9 Zhang, R., Di, B., Luo, Y., Deng, X., Grieneisen, M.L., Wang, Z., Yao,
Zeeshan, M., Oanh, N.T.K.: Science of the total environment assessment G., Zhan, Y.: A nonparametric approach to filling gaps in satellite-
of the relationship between satellite AOD and ground PM 10 mea- retrieved aerosol optical depth for estimating ambient PM2.5 levels.
surement data considering synoptic meteorological patterns and Environ. Pollut. 243, 998–1007 (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
LIDAR data. Sci. Total Environ. 474, 609–618 (2014) envpol.2018.09.052
Zhan, Y., Luo, Y., Deng, X., Chen, H., Grieneisen, M.L., Shen, X., Zhu, Zhang, G., Rui, X., Fan, Y.: Critical review of methods to estimate PM2.5
L., Zhang, M.: Spatiotemporal prediction of continuous daily PM2.5 concentrations within specified research region. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-
concentrations across China using a spatially explicit machine learn- Inf. 7(9), 368 (2018b). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7090368
ing algorithm. Atmos. Environ. 155, 129–139 (2017). https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.023
Zhang, Y., Li, Z.: Remote sensing of atmospheric fine particulate matter Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
(PM 2.5 ) mass concentration near the ground from satellite tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Korean Meteorological Society

You might also like