You are on page 1of 6

Epilepsia, 46(Suppl.

4):8–13, 2005
Blackwell Publishing, Inc.

C International League Against Epilepsy

Epidemiology of Bipolar Disorders

Michael Bauer and Andrea Pfennig

Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany

Summary: Bipolar, or manic–depressive, disorders are frequent could be minor bipolars. Research efforts to refine the diagnostic
and severe mental illnesses associated with considerable morbid- criteria of bipolar disorder aim at an earlier and complete recog-
ity and mortality. Epilepsy and bipolar disorder could probably nition of the disease to provide appropriate pharmacological and
share some aspects of pathophysiology because manic as well nonpharmacological treatment early in the course of the illness to
as depressive symptoms are seen in patients with seizures, and anticipate individual suffering, suicidal behavior, and increased
a number of antiepileptic drugs are effectively used in the acute socioeconomic costs for society. This article also discusses risk
and prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder. Epidemiologic factors, comorbid conditions, course of illness, as well as the
research suggests a dimensional composition of bipolar illness individual and socioeconomic impact of bipolar disorders.
at the population level. Apart from the DSM-IV diagnostic fea- Conclusions: The findings suggest reconceptualizing bipo-
tures of bipolar I (mania and depression) and bipolar II (hypoma- lar illnesses as highly recurrent, malignant disorders that oc-
nia and depression), the concept of bipolar spectrum disorders cur far more frequently than previously thought. Interdisci-
comprises a range of bipolar conditions with less obvious mani- plinary knowledge transfer could help to increase our under-
festations with estimated lifetime prevalence rates ranging from standing of the pathophysiology of these disorders as well as
2.8 to 6.5%. Expanding the definition of bipolar II disorders provide grounds for better recognition and treatment of patients
shows that half of the patients currently diagnosed with a unipo- with manic and/or depressive symptoms. Key Words: Bipolar
lar depressive episode could suffer from unrecognized bipolar II disorders—Manic–depressive disorders—Epidemiology, Mood
disorder, and about the same number of mild depressive patients stabilizer.

Bipolar, or manic–depressive, disorders are frequent, lar I (manic or mixed episodes in the course of disease
severe, and often chronic mental illnesses. They are asso- apart from depressive episodes), Bipolar II disorder (hy-
ciated with considerable morbidity and mortality, and for pomania for ≥4 days but no manic states in the course of
many patients, an initial episode of mania or depression disease, apart from depressive episodes), and bipolar dis-
evolves into a life-long illness. To prevent recurrence, sui- order not otherwise specified (Bipolar NOS) (1). The last
cidal behavior, and chronicity, long-term pharmacologic mentioned includes patients experiencing bipolar features
treatment is indicated early in the course of the disease. that do not meet the criteria for bipolar disorder (i.e., hy-
Population data suggest an increased prevalence of de- pomania without depressive episodes or bipolar disorder
pression and bipolar disorders in patients with seizures, due to medical conditions). Cyclothymia forms a distinct
and a number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used, diagnosis requiring ≥2 years of fluctuating mood distur-
apart from lithium, in the short-term therapy and as long- bances with hypomanic and depressive states insufficient
term mood stabilizers. Important epidemiologic aspects in severity to meet the criteria for Bipolar I or II.
of bipolar disorders are discussed in this article. According to the International Statistical Classification
of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION AND LIFETIME (ICD-10; 2), a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder re-
PREVALENCE RATES quires manic, hypomanic, or mixed episodes. The term
“other bipolar affective disorders” includes Bipolar II and
Bipolar disorders are classified within the framework of
recurrent manic episodes, and Bipolar NOS again com-
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
prises patients experiencing bipolar features that do not
Fourth Edition (DSM-IV, published by the American Psy-
meet the criteria for bipolar disorder. A separate classi-
chiatric Association), which differentiates between Bipo-
fication exists for manic episodes independent of bipo-
lar disorder available in case only one manic episode has
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. Bauer at De-
partment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-University Medicine been observed. Cyclothymia is defined as persistent in-
Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10117 stability of mood involving mild depression and mood
Berlin, Germany. E-mail: michael.bauer@charite.de elations.

8
15281167, 2005, s4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.463003.x by Muni University, Wiley Online Library on [03/03/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BIPOLAR DISORDERS 9

TABLE 1. Lifetime prevalence rates of bipolar disorders


Diagnosis (DSM-IV) Study/author Year Country Lifetime prevalence

Bipolar I NCS/Kessler et al. 1994 U.S.A. 0.4


Bipolar I and II ECA/Regier et al. 1988 U.S.A. 1.2
NCS/Kessler et al. 1994 U.S.A 1.6
Weissman et al. 1996 Cross-national 0.3–1.5
NHANES III/Jonas et al. 2003 U.S.A. 1.6
Bipolar II Oliver and Simmons 1985 U.S.A. 3.0
Weissman et al. 1991 U.S.A. 0.6
Stefansson et al. 1991 Iceland 0.5
Bipolar spectrum Weissman and Myers 1978 U.S.A. 3.0
Oliver and Simmons 1985 U.S.A. 3.3
Heun and Maier 1993 Germany 6.5
Angst 1998 Switzerland 2.8

NCS, National Comorbidity Study; ECA, Epidemiologic Catchment Area study; NHANES III, 3rd National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder is a malignant form Strong support has been given for expanding the def-
of bipolar illness characterized by four or more disease inition of bipolar II disorders (22–24). In an attempt to
episodes during the previous 12-month period (3). Rapid validate the Zurich study data, Angst et al. challenged the
cycling affects ∼15% of bipolar patients and is established DSM-IV diagnostic requirements for hypomania, suggest-
either from the beginning or develops in the course of the ing that the demanded length of the hypomanic state of ≥4
disease. This subtype is associated with increased depres- days may be too restrictive. With the established DSM-IV
sive symptoms and risk for suicidal behavior (4). criteria, 0.5% of patients had Bipolar I disorder, 1.7% had
Lifetime prevalence rates of bipolar disorder are esti- Bipolar II disorder, and 21.3% had Major depressive dis-
mated to range from 1 to 5% in the general population order. With newly defined “hard” and “soft” Zurich crite-
(5–8). The median lifetime prevalence found in 11 stud- ria, the prevalence of patients with Bipolar II was 5.3 and
ies reviewed by Wittchen (9) is 1.3% (range, 0.6–3.3). 11.0%, respectively, and the percentage of patients with
Lifetime prevalence of Bipolar II disorder is suggested to Major depressive disorder was reduced to 17.1 and 11.4%.
range from 0.5 to 3.0% (10–14, see Table 1 for prevalence The findings imply that up to half of the patients currently
rates estimated in different studies). diagnosed with a unipolar depressive episode could suffer
Epidemiologic research suggests a dimensional compo- from unrecognized Bipolar II disorder and about the same
sition of bipolar illness at the population level. The concept proportion of mild depressive patients from minor bipolar
of bipolar spectrum disorders (proposed by 15; refined by disorder (21).
16 and 17) comprises a range of bipolar conditions with
less-obvious manifestations. Estimates of lifetime preva- THE CHALLENGE OF RECOGNIZING BIPOLAR
lence rates for bipolar spectrum disorders range from 2.8 DISORDERS
to 6.5% (10,11,18–20). Table 2 shows the classification
approach used by Angst in 2003 (21). Bipolar disorders are not easy to recognize because
many symptoms overlap with other psychiatric disorders,
comorbidity is common (both psychiatric and somatic),
patients often lack insight into their illness (especially for
TABLE 2. Bipolar spectrum conceptualized by Angst et al. hypomanic states), and stigmatizing societal environments
2003 (ref. 21)
are only slowly changing (see also 25,26). In a recent
Classification Description survey using a validated screening instrument (the Mood
Disorder Questionnaire) in 127,000 adult U.S. citizens,
Bipolar I Hospitalized mania plus major depression
Bipolar II DSM-III-R major depressive episodes associated the overall rate for Bipolar I and II disorders, weighted
with to match the 2000 U.S. Census demographics, was 3.4%
(a) a hypomanic syndrome as defined above, or (3.7% after adjustment for nonresponse bias). Supporting
(b) hypomanic symptoms only
Minor bipolar Dysthymia, minor depression, or recurrent brief de- previous findings, only 19.8% of individuals with posi-
disorder pression associated with tive screening reported having previously been diagnosed
(a) the hypomanic syndrome or with bipolar disorders by a physician, whereas 31.2% re-
(b) hypomanic symptoms only
Pure hypomania (a) a hypomanic syndrome without any diagno- ported having received a diagnosis of unipolar depression
sis of depression, and (27; see also 28). Identifying hypomanic episodes is not
(b) hypomanic symptoms only an easy task because patients are usually not functionally
DSM-III-R, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, impaired; instead, they often show increased achievement
3rd revised edition. potential. However, hypomania is by no means benign, as

Epilepsia, Vol. 46, Suppl. 4, 2005


15281167, 2005, s4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.463003.x by Muni University, Wiley Online Library on [03/03/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
10 M. BAUER AND A. PFENNIG

it is accompanied by a high risk for suicidal behavior and with equal frequencies. However, Bipolar II appears to be
social impairment and is followed by manic episodes in more common in women. About 80–90% of patients with
10–15% of cases in the course of illness (21,29). the malignant type of rapid-cycling bipolar disorder are
The scientific and clinical endeavors to refine the di- women (51). Additionally, women are more likely to ex-
agnostic criteria of bipolar disorders aim at building the perience mixed mania and manic switches during antide-
groundwork for an earlier and complete recognition of pressant treatment (51). Comorbidity of somatic and psy-
the disease. This provides the chance for choosing the ap- chiatric disorders is more common in women than in men
propriate pharmacological and nonpharmacological treat- (52). Finding the right treatment regimen can be challeng-
ment early in the course of the disease to anticipate ing in women who wish to conceive as well as in pregnancy
individual suffering, suicidal behavior, and increased so- and breast-feeding periods. Individualized risk–benefit as-
cioeconomic costs for society. sessments are required to promote the health of the woman
and avoid or limit exposure of the fetus or infant to poten-
Pathophysiology
tial adverse effects of medication (52).
Despite major research achievements, the underlying
pathophysiology of bipolar disorders, including molecular Psychiatric and somatic comorbidities
causes and mechanisms, is still obscure. Imaging studies Lifetime prevalence rates of comorbid psychiatric and
(reviewed by Bruno in this volume) have been variable, medical conditions are increased in patients with bipolar
with suggested abnormalities in prefrontal cortex, lim- disorders, complicating the treatment and overall man-
bic regions, striatum, ventricular volume, and in some in- agement of the disorder (53). About 22% of bipolar pa-
stances, cerebellum (30–34). With proton resonance spec- tients have an additional somatic condition, and 39% a
troscopy, reduced levels of a potential marker for neuronal second psychiatric one (of that, two thirds are related to
density and viability were found in the dorsolateral pre- substance abuse; 54). The Epidemiologic Catchment Area
frontal cortex of euthymic bipolar patients (35,36). Neu- (ECA) study demonstrated that a diagnosis of substance
roanatomic studies show decreased neuronal and glial den- abuse or dependence is found more often in bipolar pa-
sity in prefrontal cortex that appears to be more exten- tients than in those with any other Axis I disorder (12).
sive than in unipolar depression (37–40). Neurotransmit- Substance-abusing bipolar patients show higher rates of
ter systems probably involved in the pathophysiology of suicide attempts, panic attacks, and very fast cycling (55).
bipolar illnesses include serotonergic pathways, as well Goodwin and Hoven (56) found that the co-occurrence of
as the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid and –adrenal sys- bipolar disorders and panic attacks was associated with
tems (41–44). Examining the mechanisms of action of an earlier onset and more severe expression of the panic
mood stabilizers has provided clues to potential underly- disorder.
ing neurobiologic abnormalities in bipolar disorders (see Prevalence rates of both depressive and bipolar spec-
also 45,46). trum disorders in persons with epilepsy appear to be higher
Family studies have consistently demonstrated the ge- than those in the general population. Recent data from
netic liability of bipolar disorders. First-degree relatives of community samples show rates significantly above those
affected individuals have a 10-fold increased risk for de- in patients with and without other chronic diseases (57).
veloping the disease compared to relatives of unaffected Mania is reported less frequently than depression (58).
controls (47). Twin and adoption studies have provided
Age at onset and course of disease
evidence that genes strongly contribute to familial trans-
Unlike unipolar depression, bipolar disorders are man-
mission of the illness. Early-onset bipolar disorder appears
ifested to a great extent in the adolescent and young-adult
to be associated with increased familial risk, and studies
years (see 59). The peak age at onset of the first symp-
have identified other putative familial subtypes, includ-
toms of bipolar disorder is between age 15 and 19. The
ing lithium-responsive bipolar disorder and bipolar dis-
median age at onset of 2,839 patients with bipolar dis-
order with psychosis or comorbid panic disorder (48,49).
orders recorded by the Stanley Center Bipolar Disorder
McGuffin et al. (50) applied statistical models to the data
Registry was 17.5 years (mean, 19.8 years; 60). Bipolar
of 67 twin pairs, estimating a heritability of 85% for bipo-
disorders can appear before puberty; however, this is rare
lar disorder, leaving only 15% of variance to individual
and difficult to distinguish from other severe psychiatric
specific and/or nonfamilial environmental effects. They
disorders such as schizophrenia, unipolar depression, and
estimated the genetic correlation of bipolar disorder and
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (61,62).
depression to be 0.65 and of nonfamilial environment to be
Elderly patients also can have symptoms of bipolar dis-
0.59. Interestingly, 71% of the genetic variance in liability
orders for the first time in old age. However, manic and
to mania was not shared by depression (50).
depressive symptoms in this age group have usually been
Implications of gender present for many years, and in mild cases, have often gone
Gender influences both presentation and course of bipo- untreated. Onset of mania after age 60 is less likely to be
lar disorders. Bipolar I disorder affects men and women associated with a family history of bipolar disorder and

Epilepsia, Vol. 46, Suppl. 4, 2005


15281167, 2005, s4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.463003.x by Muni University, Wiley Online Library on [03/03/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BIPOLAR DISORDERS 11

more likely secondary to medical causes other than bipo- tients, reducing the risk for suicidal acts in Bipolar I and
lar disorders [e.g., neurologic (trauma, neoplasm, multiple II patients by 82 and 67% (80).
sclerosis, stroke, epilepsy), endocrine (hyperthyroidism,
Cushing disease), infectious (AIDS), and inflammatory HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE AND
(systemic lupus erythematosus) disorders (63)]. SOCIOECONOMIC BURDEN
Usually a delay of 5–10 years is found between the first
episode of a bipolar disorder and the age at first treatment Studies assessing the impact of bipolar disorders on the
or hospitalization (64). In a study of 450 bipolar patients, health-related quality of life show outcomes resembling or
the observed latency from the first episode of bipolar ill- even worse than that seen in patients with chronic somatic
ness to the start of maintenance treatment averaged 7.8 and some other psychiatric diseases (81–84).
years (median, 5 years), during which time patients expe- Adding to the suffering of bipolar patients and their
rienced a mean of 9.4 episodes (median, five episodes). families, the condition significantly increases costs for
In the years before maintenance treatment, patients were society (85). At present, estimated annual total disease
ill ∼46.5% of the time, and 28.7% of subjects had at least costs in Germany amount to ∼Euro 5.9 billion, mainly
two episodes per year (65). Leverich et al. (66) found a arising from indirect costs (86); in the United States, the
mean age at first treatment of 29.2 years in their sample costs for society in 1991 were calculated to reach ∼US$
of 631 bipolar patients. 45 billion (87). Work impairment in bipolar patients is
Manic–depressive disorders have a high rate of recur- even greater than that seen in unipolar depressed patients
rence (>90% of individuals who have a single manic (88–90).
episode will have future episodes). The natural course of
the illness and its phenotypic expression are highly vari- NEEDS AND PERSPECTIVES
able. It has been estimated that without adequate treat-
ment, the average patient experiencing the onset of bipo- The findings discussed suggest a reconceptualization of
lar disorders at age 25 years will have a few episodes; bipolar illnesses as highly recurrent and malignant disor-
however, 10–15% of patients will undergo >10 episodes ders that occur more frequently than previously thought.
(64,67). The prevalence of residual depressive symptoms Because early recognition and intervention may be able
was estimated to be 40–85% in bipolar patients, showing to ameliorate adverse outcomes, efforts should be taken
positive associations with recurrences (68). to implement structured screening and diagnosis tools and
An early onset of bipolar disorders increases the risk for treatment guidelines, including both pharmacological and
a severe course and poor outcome of the disease. The risk nonpharmacological strategies into research and clinical
for having the rapid-cycling type (69), suicidal ideation, practice. Interdisciplinary transfer of knowledge is re-
and comorbidity with substance abuse–related disorders quired, bearing in mind high comorbidity rates of bipolar
also is increased (69–71). Other predictors of poor out- disorders with other medical, neurologic, and psychiatric
come include childhood psychopathology (72), being fe- illnesses and the likely shared aspects of pathophysiol-
male (see gender differences and 73), and poor adherence ogy.
to treatment (74).
REFERENCES

Increased suicide risk 1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical man-
Suicidal behavior is the most serious consequence of ual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
bipolar disorders, reaching a lifetime prevalence of suicide 2. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and
behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guide-
attempts of up to 30% (5,75,76). The odds ratio for sui- lines. Geneva: WHO, 1992.
cide attempts was 6.2 in the subjects of the ECA database 3. Dunner DL, Fieve RR. Clinical factors in lithium carbonate prophy-
versus controls (compared with 3.1 in unipolar depres- laxis failure. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974;30:229–33.
4. Coryell W, Solomon D, Turvey C, et al. The long-term course of
sion (77,78). Up to 20% of bipolar patients die of suicide. rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:914–
Data from the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network show 20.
that several factors are associated with an increased risk 5. Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Berghöfer A, Bauer M. Bipolar disorder.
Lancet 2002;359:241–7.
for suicidal behavior in bipolar patients, including genetic 6. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month
and familial variables, childhood and recent environmen- prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States:
tal adversities, loss of social and medical support, psy- results from the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1994;51:8–19.
chiatric comorbidity, and a more severe course of bipolar 7. Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ, et al. Cross-national
illness (79). An early and appropriate treatment provides epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. JAMA
the background for effective prevention of suicidal mor- 1996;276:293–9.
8. Jonas BS, Brody D, Roper M, et al. Prevalence of mood disorders in a
tality (5). Lithium proved to be the most efficient drug national sample of young American adults. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr
in long-term treatment of both unipolar and bipolar pa- Epidemiol 2003;38:618–24.

Epilepsia, Vol. 46, Suppl. 4, 2005


15281167, 2005, s4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.463003.x by Muni University, Wiley Online Library on [03/03/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
12 M. BAUER AND A. PFENNIG

9. Wittchen HU. Epidemiology of affective disorders. In: Helmchen H, 35. Winsberg ME, Sachs N, Tate DL, et al. Decreased dorsolateral
Henn F, Lauter H, et al., eds. Schizophrene und affektive Stoerungen. prefrontal N-acetyl aspartate in bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry
Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000:357–72. 2000;47:475–81.
10. Weissman MM, Myers JK. Affective disorders in a US urban com- 36. Chang K, Adleman N, Dienes K, et al. Decreased N-acetylaspartate
munity: the use of research diagnostic criteria in an epidemiological in children with familial bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2003;
survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:1304–11. 53:1059–65.
11. Oliver JM, Simmons ME. Affective disorders and depression as 37. Rajkowska G, Halaris A, Selemon LD. Reductions in neuronal and
measured by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and the Beck De- glial density characterize the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in bipolar
pression Inventory in an unselected adult population. J Clin Psychol disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2001;49:741–52.
1985;41:469–77. 38. Benes FM, Kwok EW, Vincent SL, et al. A reduction of nonpyra-
12. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental dis- midal cells in sector CA2 of schizophrenics and manic depressives.
orders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the Epidemi- Biol Psychiatry 1998;44:88–97.
ologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA 1990;264:2511–8. 39. Benes FM, Vincent SL, Todtenkopf M. The density of pyramidal and
13. Weissman MM, Bruce ML, Leaf PJ, et al. Affective disorders. In: nonpyramidal neurons in anterior cingulate cortex of schizophrenic
Robins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric disorders in America. New and bipolar subjects. Biol Psychiatry 2001;50:395–406.
York: The Free Press, 1991:53–80. 40. Ongur D, Drevets WC, Price JL. Glial reduction in the subgen-
14. Stefansson JG, Lindal E, Bjornsson JK, Guomundsdottir A. Life- ual prefrontal cortex in mood disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
time prevalence of specific mental disorders among people born in 1998;95:13290–5.
Iceland in 1931. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;84:142–9. 41. Sobczak S, Honig A, van Duinen MA, et al. Serotonergic dysregula-
15. Dunner DL, Gershon ES, Goodwin FK. Heritable factors in tion in bipolar disorders: a literature review of serotonergic challenge
the severity of affective illness. Sci Pro Am Psychiatric Assoc studies. Bipolar Disord 2002;4:347–56.
1970;123:187–8. 42. Shiah IS, Yatham LN. Serotonin in mania and in the mechanism
16. Klerman GL. The spectrum of mania. Comp Psychiatry 1981;22:11– of action of mood stabilizers: a review of clinical studies. Bipolar
20. Disord 2000;2:77–92.
17. Akiskal HS. The prevalent clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: 43. Bauer M, London ED, Silverman DH, et al. Thyroid, brain and mood
beyond DSM-IV. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1996;16:4S–14S. modulation in affective disorder: insights from molecular research
18. Heun R, Maier W. The distinction of bipolar II disorder from bipolar and functional brain imaging. Pharmacopsychiatry 2003;36(suppl
I and recurrent unipolar depression: results of a controlled family 3):S215–21.
study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993;87:279–84. 44. Rybakowski JK, Twardowska K. The dexamethasone/corticotropin-
19. Szadoczky E, Papp Z, Vitrai J, et al. The prevalence of major de- releasing hormone test in depression in bipolar and unipolar affective
pressive and bipolar disorders in Hungary: results from a national illness. J Psychiatry Res 1999;33:363–70.
epidemiologic survey. J Affect Disord 1998;50:153–62. 45. Lenox RH, Wang L. Molecular basis of lithium action: integration
20. Angst J. The emerging epidemiology of hypomania and bipolar II of lithium-responsive signaling and gene expression networks. Mol
disorder. J Affect Disord 1998;50:143–51. Psychiatry 2003;8:135–44.
21. Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, et al. Toward a re-definition of 46. Sassi RB, Soares JC. Emerging therapeutic targets in bipolar mood
subthreshold bipolarity: epidemiology and proposed criteria for disorder. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2001;5:587–99.
bipolar-II, minor bipolar disorders and hypomania. J Affect Disord 47. Smoller JW, Finn CT. Family, twin, and adoption studies of bipolar
2003;73:133–46. disorder. Am J Med Genet 2003;123C:48–58.
22. Akiskal HS, Bourgeois ML, Angst J, et al. Re-evaluating the preva- 48. Strober M, Morrell W, Burroughs J, et al. A family study of bipo-
lence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spec- lar I disorder in adolescence: early onset of symptoms linked to
trum of bipolar disorders. J Affect Disord 2000;59(suppl 1):S5–30. increased familial loading and lithium resistance. J Affect Disord
23. Cassano GB, Dell’Osso L, Frank E, et al. The bipolar spectrum: 1988;15:255–68.
a clinical reality in search of diagnostic criteria and an assessment 49. Schurhoff F, Bellivier F, Covent R, et al. Early and late onset bipolar
methodology. J Affect Disord 1999;54:319–28. disorders: two different forms of manic-depressive illness? J Affect
24. Piver A, Yatham LN, Lam RW. Bipolar spectrum disorders: new Disord 2000;58:215–21.
perspectives. Can Fam Physician 2002;48:896–904. 50. McGuffin P, Rijsdijk F, Andrew M, et al. The heritability of bipolar
25. Evans DL. Bipolar disorder: diagnostic challenges and treatment affective disorder and the genetic relationship to unipolar depression.
considerations. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(suppl 13):26–31. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:497–502.
26. Ghaemi N, Sachs GS, Goodwin FK. What is to be done? Contro- 51. Burt VK, Rasgon N. Special considerations in treating bipolar dis-
versies in the diagnosis and treatment of manic-depressive illness. order in women. Bipolar Disord 2004;6:2–13.
World J Biol Psychiatry 2000;1:65–74. 52. Arnold LM. Gender differences in bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Clin
27. Hirschfeld RM, Calabrese JR, Weissman MM, et al. Screening North Am 2003;26:595–620.
for bipolar disorder in the community. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64: 53. Suppes T, Dennehy EB, Gibbons EW. The longitudinal course of
53–9. bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(suppl 9):23–30.
28. Kessler RC, Rubinow DR, Holmes C, et al. The epidemiology of 54. Walden J, Grunze H. Epidemiology and societal impact of bipolar
DSM-III-R bipolar I disorder in a general population survey. Psychol affective disorders. In: Walden J, Grunze H, eds. Bipolar affective
Med 1997;27:1079–89. disorders. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2003:7–12.
29. Judd LL, Akiskal HS. The prevalence and disability of bipolar 55. Feinman JA, Dunner DL. The effect of alcohol and substance
spectrum disorders in the U.S. population: re-analysis of the ECA abuse on the course of bipolar affective disorder. J Affect Disord
database taking into account subthreshold cases. J Affect Disord 1996;37:43–9.
2003;73:123–31. 56. Goodwin RD, Hoven CW. Bipolar-panic comorbidity in the general
30. Soares JC, Mann JJ. The functional neuroanatomy of mood disor- population: prevalence and associated morbidity. J Affect Disord
ders. J Psychiatr Res 1997;31:393–432. 2002;70:27–33.
31. Soares JC, Mann JJ. The anatomy of mood disorders: review 57. Barry JJ. The recognition and management of mood disorders as a
of structural neuroimaging studies. Biol Psychiatry 1997;41:86– comorbidity of epilepsy. Epilepsia 2003;44(suppl 4):30–40.
106. 58. Jagadheesan K, Garg AK, Nizamie SH. Risk factors and out-
32. Drevets WC, Ongur D, Price JL. Neuroimaging abnormalities in the come of mood disorders in epilepsy: a case-control study. Seizure
subgenual prefrontal cortex: implications for the pathophysiology 2003;12:121–5.
of familial mood disorders. Mol Psychiatry 1998;3:220–1. 59. Costello EJ, Pine DS, Hammen C, et al. Development and natural
33. Drevets WC. Functional neuroimaging studies of depression: the history of mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2002;52:529–42.
anatomy of melancholia. Annu Rev Med 1998;49:341–61. 60. Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Grochocinski VJ, et al. Demographic and clin-
34. Vawter MP, Freed WJ, Kleinman JE. Neuropathology of bipolar ical characteristics of individuals in a bipolar disorder case registry.
disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:486–504. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:120–5.

Epilepsia, Vol. 46, Suppl. 4, 2005


15281167, 2005, s4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.463003.x by Muni University, Wiley Online Library on [03/03/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BIPOLAR DISORDERS 13

61. Geller B, Williams M, Zimerman B, et al. Prepubertal and early 76. Oquendo MA, Mann JJ. Identifying and managing suicide risk in
adolescent bipolarity differentiate from ADHD by manic symptoms, bipolar patients. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(suppl 25):31–4.
grandiose delusions, ultra-rapid or ultradian cycling. J Affect Disord 77. Kessler RC, Stang P, Wittchen HU, et al. Lifetime co-morbidities
1998;51:81–91. between social phobia and mood disorders in the US National Co-
62. Geller B, Craney JL, Bolhofner K, et al. Phenomenology and lon- morbidity Survey. Psychol Med 1999;29:555–67.
gitudinal course of children with a prepubertal and early adolescent 78. Chen YW, Dilsaver SC. Lifetime rates of suicide attempts among
bipolar disorder phenotype. In: Geller B, DelBello MP, eds. Bipolar subjects with bipolar and unipolar disorders relative to subjects with
disorder in childhood and early adolescence. New York: Guilford other Axis I disorders. Biol Psychiatry 1996;39:896–9.
Publications. 2003:25–50. 79. Leverich GS, Altshuler LL, Frye MA, et al. Factors associated with
63. McDonald WM, Nemeroff CB. The diagnosis and treatment of ma- suicide attempts in 648 patients with bipolar disorder in the Stanley
nia in the elderly. Bull Menninger Clin 1996;60:174–96. Foundation Bipolar Network. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:506–15.
64. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the 80. Tondo L, Isacsson G, Baldessarini R. Suicidal behaviour in bipolar
treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry disorder: risk and prevention. CNS Drugs 2003;17:491–511.
1994;151(suppl):1–36. 81. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, et al. The functioning and well-
65. Baldessarini RJ, Tondo L, Hennen J. Treatment-latency and previous being of depressed patients: Results from the Medical Outcomes
episodes: relationships to pretreatment morbidity and response to Study. JAMA 1989;262:914–9.
maintenance treatment in bipolar I and II disorders. Bipolar Disord 82. Robb JC, Cooke RG, Devins GM, et al. Quality of life and
2003;5:169–79. lifestyle disruption in euthymic bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res
66. Leverich GS, McElroy SL, Suppes T, et al. Early physical and sex- 1997;31:509–17.
ual abuse associated with an adverse course of bipolar illness. Biol 83. AHCPR (Agency for Health Care Policy and Research). Evi-
Psychiatry 2002;51:288–97. dence report on treatment of depression: newer pharmacothera-
67. Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. Manic-depressive illness. New York: pies: San Antonio Evidence-Based Practice Center. Washington,
Oxford University Press, 1990. DC: AHCPR, 1999.
68. Benazzi F. Prevalence and clinical correlates of residual de- 84. Unutzer J, Patrick DL, Diehr P, et al. Quality adjusted life years in
pressive symptoms in bipolar II disorder. Psychother Psychosom older adults with depressive symptoms and chronic medical disor-
2001;70:232–8. ders. Int Psychogeriatr 2000;12:15–33.
69. Carter TD, Mundo E, Parikh SV, et al. Early age at onset as a 85. Brunello N, Burrows GD, Jonsson CPB, et al. Critical issues in the
risk factor for poor outcome of bipolar disorder. J Psychiatry Res treatment of affective disorders. Depression 1995;3:187–98.
2003;37:297–303. 86. Runge C, Grunze H. Bipolare Störungen in Deutschland:
70. Leverich GS, Nolen WA, Rush AJ, et al. The Stanley Foundation eine Krankheitskostenstudie für das Jahr 2002. Gemeinsame
Bipolar Treatment Outcome Network, I: longitudinal methodology. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen
J Affect Disord 2001;67:33–44. e.V.(DGBS) und der International Group for the Study of Lithium-
71. Tohen M, Greenfield SF, Weiss RD, et al. The effect of comorbid Treated Patients e.V.(IGSLI), Abstractband 2003,22.
substance use disorders on the course of bipolar disorder: a review. 87. Wyatt RJ, Henter I. An economic evaluation of manic-depressive
Harv Rev Psychiatry 1998;6:133–41. illness: 1991. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1995;30:213–9.
72. Carlson GA, Bromet EJ, Driessens C, et al. Age at onset, childhood 88. Goldberg JF, Harrow M, Grossman LS. Course and outcome in
psychopathology, and 2-year outcome in psychotic bipolar disorder. bipolar affective disorder: a longitudinal follow-up study. Am J Psy-
Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:307–9. chiatry 1995;152:379–84.
73. Sit D. Women and bipolar disorder across the life span. J Am Med 89. Tsai SY, Chen CC, Yeh EK. Alcohol problems and long-term psy-
Womens Assoc 2004;59:91–100. chosocial outcome in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect
74. Tsai SM, Chen C, Kuo C, et al. 15-Year outcome of treated bipolar Disord 1997;46:143–50.
disorder. J Affect Disord 2001;63:215–20. 90. ten Have M, Vollebergh W, Bijl R, et al. Bipolar disorder in the gen-
75. Oquendo MA, Waternaux C, Brodsky B, et al. Suicidal behavior eral population in The Netherlands (prevalence, consequences and
in bipolar mood disorder: clinical characteristics of attempters and care utilization): results from The Netherlands Mental Health Survey
nonattempters. J Affect Disord 2000;59:107–17. and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). J Affect Disord 2002;68:203–13.

Epilepsia, Vol. 46, Suppl. 4, 2005

You might also like