Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interactions Collaboration Skills For School Professionals 7Th Edition All Chapter Scribd Ebook PDF
Interactions Collaboration Skills For School Professionals 7Th Edition All Chapter Scribd Ebook PDF
II Teams 134
• Connections 135
• Learner Objectives 135
• A Case for Collaboration 136
Introduction 136
Team Concepts 137
Characteristics of Teams 138
Developmental Stages for Teams 141
Rationale for and Benefits of Teams 142
Drawbacks of Teams 144
Team Models 144
Disciplinary Relationships on Teams 145
Effectiveness of Teams 156
The Team's Goals Are Clear 156
Members' Needs Are Met 156
Members Have Individual Accountability 156
viii CONTENTS
II Co-Teaching 160
• Connections 161
• Learner Objectives 161
• A Case for Collaboration 162
Introduction 162
Co-Teaching Concepts 162
Defining Characteristics of Co-Teaching 163
Rationale for Co-Teaching 166
Co-Teaching Approaches 168
One Teaching, One Observing 168
Station Teaching 170
Parallel Teaching 171
Alternative Teaching 172
Teaming 173
One Teaching, One Assisting 175
Co-Teaching and Collaboration 176
The Co-Teaching Relationship 176
Maintaining Collaborative Relationships in Co-Teaching 178
Administrative Matters Related to Co-Teaching 181
Time for Planning 182
Options for Creating Shared Planning Time 183
Summary 186
Collaborative Activities 187
Coaching 201
Rationale for and Benefits of Coaching 202
Coaching Models 204
Coaching in Practice 205
Mentoring 206
The Impact of Mentoring 207
Issues Related to Indirect Services 208
Understanding of the Professional Relationships 208
Time Allocation for Professional Collaboration 209
Cultural Differences 209
Confidentiality 209
Summary 210
Collaborative Activities 210
mParaeducators 244
• Connections 245
• Learner Objectives 245
• A Case for Collaboration 246
Introduction 246
x CONTENTS
Introduction 294
Community Contexts 295
Community Outreach 296
School-Community Partnerships 296
Community Liaisons 297
Interagency Contexts 299
Early Intervention and Preschool Settings 300
Vocational and Community-Based Services 303
Summary 306
References 334
Name Index 356
Subject Index 371
This page intentionally left blank
Features at a Glance
E-Partnerships
Chapter 1
Collaborating Through Blogging 20
Chapter 2
Using Old-Fashioned Technology to Your Advantage 37
Chapter 3
Using E-Mail Effectively 62
Chapter 4
Gathering Information Through Online Surveys 94
Chapter 5
Technology to Facilitate Problem Solving 115
Chapter 6
Using the Internet to Collaborate with Colleagues 149
Chapter 7
Using Wikis to Plan for Co-Teaching 184
Chapter 8
Virtual Coaching 205
Electronic Mentoring 207
Chapter 9
Skills for Difficult Interactions 221
Chapter 10
Paraeducators on the Web 259
Chapter 11
Families on the Web 288
Chapter 13
Collaboration 2.0? Twitter! 323
RSS: Sorting Through the Avalanche of Internet Information 325
xiii
xiv FEATURES AT A GLANCE
Chapter 12
Getting the Most from the Pros 297
Ten Key Strategies for Effective Partnerships 298
Being a Valued Member of an Early Intervention or Preschool Team 302
Strategies for Enhancing Collaboration with Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors 306
Chapter 13
Strategies for Developing Administrative Support 313
A Basis in Research
Chapter 1
Does Collaboration Improve Student Achievement? 10
Chapter 3
Smile, if You Want the Full Scoop! 64
Teaching Communication Skills 67
Chapter 4
Some Evidence-Based Information About Questions 89
Chapter 5
Understanding How Bias May Occur in Interpersonal Problem Solving 112
Chapter 6
Successful Teamwork: Facilitators and Barriers 148
General Education Teachers and Pre-referral Teaming 154
Chapter 7
Co-Teaching: Promise Versus Evidence 164
Chapter 8
Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Behavioral Consultation 197
Chapter 9
Conflict in Special Education: Advocates and Due Process 218
Constructive Conflict and Psychological Safety 223
Chapter 10
Paraeducators Supporting Students from Diverse Backgrounds 253
Chapter 11
Family Involvement in and Satisfaction with Special Education Processes 284
Chapter 12
Factors That Affect Successful Interagency Collaboration 301
Chapter 13
Roles and Responsibilities of Novice General and Special Educators 316
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
Collaboration has assumed a prominent role in twenty-first century society. It forms the
foundation of contemporary business models, defines practice in the health occupa-
tions, and, importantly, characterizes the most effective schools. Today's emphasis on
collaboration is not surprising: In a world that is now routinely electronically connected
so that thinking globally is required, and with unimaginable amounts of information
produced and available every day, collaboration has moved from being a luxury to a
necessity. Only by effectively working together can meaningful goals be reached.
Schools reflect what is occurring in our larger society. Diversity has grown expo-
nentially. Knowledge about instructional practices that can improve student outcomes is
more important than ever before, and educators are scrambling to respond to the federal
mandates that require increasingly high standards and a clear trajectory of improving
academic performance for all students, including those with disabilities and other spe-
cial needs. lt is into this complex but exhilarating context that we prepared this seventh
edition of Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals.
xvii
xviii PREFACE
These are not the only changes made to enhance the quality and timeliness of In-
teractions. Case studies at the beginning of each chapter can be the basis for discussion
about the information provided throughout that chapter. Additional information on
student collaboration was added. Many of the features are updated or replaced, and over
250 new references help ensure the material is current. We sincerely hope you'll find the
entire package of revisions helpful.
Chap ter 13 provides a conclusion to this book by exploring trends and issues related
to collaboration. Collaborative efforts are influenced by the roles of the persons who
collaborate, on a topic explored in the chapter. Other issues are raised as well, including
systemic barriers that may impede collaboration, collaboration in the electronic age,
student collaboration, and the future of collaboration , including ethical matters that
may be encountered.
The features in the seventh edition include most of those from previous editions of
Interactions, and others have been added or revised. The features include the following:
Our text is accompanied by an Online Instructor's Manual and Online Power Point
Presentation, both accessible to you at the Instructor's Resource Center at http://www.
pearsonhighered.com. To access the manual and online PowerPoint slides, go to http://
www.pearsonhighered.com and click on the Instructor's Resource button. Here you will
be able to login or complete a one-time registration for a user name and password. The
manual includes chapter outlines, additional activities and cases, and a test bank. It pro-
vides many more resources for teaching about collaboration than can be placed within
the pages of the book itself.
We hope the seventh edition of Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals
is useful to you and that you enjoy reading it. We continue to hold to our belief that
collaboration is the foundation on which su ccessful contemporary public sch ools are
based, as well as the most effective means to provide services to students with disabilities
and other special needs. If you are reading this material as a teacher, teacher candidate,
or other preprofessional, we hope this edition of Interactions helps you further under-
stand collaboration as it occurs in your workplace and enables you to refine your skills
as a collaborative educator. If you are an instructor, we hope you find the revisions we
have made useful as you prepare professionals for today's schools.
Acknowledgments
First and foremost, we want to thank all the teachers, administrators, families, related
services personnel, paraeducators, and other school personnel with whom we work for
their wisdom and insights about what it takes to make collaboration a reality. Whether
you are in our classes, in schools where we are working or gathering data, in professional
development sessions we conduct, or are electronic communication partners, we learn a
huge amount from you , directly and indirectly, and we try to apply those lessons in Inter-
actions. We also are indebted to our colleagues who teach coursework on collaboration
and who engage us in fascinating discussions of topics related to contemporary educa-
tion. As we write and edit, we are frequently using your though ts to guide our own. Even
though we cannot name all of you, we hope you see your perspectives reflected in this
edition and know of our appreciation.
We also would like to thank the following colleagues who provided professional
reviews of the sixth edition of Interactions to make suggestions for the seventh edition:
Roberta C. Brack Kaufman, University of South Dakota; Janetta L. Bradley, The Univer-
sity of Tennessee at Chattanooga; Juliet Hart, Arizona State University; Suzanne Kemp,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Mary Ann Maslak, St. John's University; and Julie A.
Seguin, California State University-Dominguez Hills. We appreciate the time and care
it takes to review a book and recognize the challenges of fitting an additional commit-
ment into your busy schedules. We appreciate the detailed and insightful comments and
suggestions you provided and we incorporated as many of them as we could into these
pages. We sincerely hope that you can see your influence.
xxii PREFACE
Foundations and
Perspectives
Personal Communication Interaction Programs
Context
Commitment Skills Processes or Services
Connections
Collaboration is essential to the practices of effective educators and the culture of suc-
cessful schools. Chapter l begins your journey of the study of collaboration and lays the
groundwork for all the information contained in subsequent chapters. ln Chapter l , you
will learn what collaboration is (and is not) and how it fits into a broader societal context.
You will also find out about the increasing attention collaboration is receiving throughout
education as well as some of the challenges educators face as their collaborative responsi-
bilities increase. Finally, you will be introduced to a framework for studying collaboration
that serves as the organizational structure for this textbook
Learner Objectives
1
2 CHAPTER ONE
H olmes County School District prides itself on its efforts related to collaboration. At the district level, administra-
tors meet regularly, and any initiative considered is examined in terms of its impact on all students, including
those who are high achievers, those who are average, those who struggle to learn, those who are English learners,
and those who have disabilities. Principals are held accountable for fostering a collaborat ive cult ure in their schools,
and applicants for any job in the district are asked a number of questions about working with others, even when it is
difficu lt. Here are examples of professionals' typical days and their col laborative roles in their schools.
Ms. Maharrin is a middle school social studies teacher. In addition to her daily teach ing responsibilities, she is a
member of her school's leadership team, and so today she attends a team meeting from 7:30 to 8:15am to discuss
several issues, including t he staff development plan for t he next school year. At lunch, Ms. Maharrin arranges to meet
with Mr. Newby, the school psychologist, to design an intervention for the new student from Somalia who is expe-
riencing considerable frust ration in the classroom. Ms. Maharrin knows the upcoming field trip will be the primary
topic for discussion during her team preparation period, and during her individual preparation period she needs to
call two parents. After school, she plans to meet with her assistant principal, Mr. O kolo, to discuss the peer t utoring
program the university interns wou ld like to establish. At the end of the day, Ms. Maharrin wryly thinks to herself that
on days like today teaching her students seems t o be the smallest part of her j ob-something she never would have
imagined when she entered the teaching profession 19 years ago.
Mr. Mendez is a second-year student support teacher (SSD at Hawthorne High School. Mr. Mendez begins each
day touching base with his colleagues in the math department and working on paperwork. Once classes begin at
7:50am, he spends the morning co-teaching two sections of Algebra I and teaching one section of a study skills
class that has a math emphasis. During his preparation period, he meets with two students and the counselor about
problems the student s are experiencing in their classes. He also prepares d irections for the paraprofessional who
is assigned to support Matt, a student wit h significant physical disabilities, in a biology class and a geometry class.
Mr. Mendez has time in his schedule for his assessment and individualized education program (IEP) writing respon-
sibilities, and this afternoon begins with an annual review and transition planning meeting for one of the students
on his caseload. After school, he works on lesson plans, meets briefly with Ms. Meyers, the social studies teacher
with whom he cochairs the school's response to intervention (RTI) team, and makes a parent phone ca ll. Mr. Mendez
considers himself an advocate for students on his caseload, but he also knows that he influences teachers' th inking
about student s who are at risk. He finds that he must pay close attention to the personalities of the teachers with
whom he works; if he establishes a strong working relationship with them, students are the beneficiaries.
Mrs. Lee is a literacy coach at River Bend Elementary School. Her primary responsibility is to assist teachers,
especially those in the first two years of their teaching careers, to increase student achievement in reading and writ-
ing . Her job usually does not include directly teaching students unless it is to model a technique or demonstrate a
strategy. Thus, Mrs. Lee spends her time observing in classrooms, meeting with teachers individually and in small
groups, advising the principal about needs she identifies related to literacy, conducting staff development on spe-
cific strategies and approaches, and analyzing and sharing literacy dat a with school staff members. She also works
closely with the school's parent advisory group to help fami lies foster literacy at home. Sometimes Mrs. Lee misses
her days as a t eacher with its clear patterns and t he joy of seeing her students succeed, but she also knows
that she helps more students now by working with all the teachers and families and that her current job
brings a different kind of satisf action.
FOUNDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES 3
Introduction
Of all the complex tasks facing educators today, none is as demanding or as critical as creat-
ing a school culture of collaboration because it is a foundation of collaboration that enables
all the other work of educators to be successful. To accomplish this goal, each person who
works in schools must have the disposition, knowledge, and skills to collaborate. For exam-
ple, each of the professionals just described has adult-adult interactions as a significant job
responsibility. Ms. Maharrin, whose primary responsibility is instruction, also is expected
to work with colleagues and parents. Half of Mr. Mendez's teaching occurs in partnership
with general education teachers in that setting. Mrs. Lee's job illustrates the emphasis today
on improving student outcomes. School leaders have realized that teachers need support
in their classrooms in order to ensure that all students access the general curriculum and
reach high standards. Taken together, these professional interactions illustrate three critical
points for understanding the premise of this text.
First, collaboration has become an integral part of today's schools (e.g., Barth, 2006;
Conderman & johnston-Rodriguez, 2009; DuFour, DuFour, & Eaker, 2008). In the past,
educators who were not very effective in working with other adults were often excused
with a comment such as, "But she's really good with students." Although working effec-
tively with students obviously is still the most important aspect of educators' jobs, it is not
enough. Everyone in schools-including special and general education teachers, adminis-
trators, related services providers, and other specialists-needs the knowledge and skills
to work with colleagues, paraprofessionals, and parents. This is true in early childhood
programs, in elementary schools, and in middle and high schools. It is true in schools that
are still regarded as traditional in terms of programs and services as well as in those leading
the way in educational innovation. Part of the reason for the importance of collaboration is
the general trend of expanding and increasingly complex responsibilities, which are more
realistically addressed when professionals pool their talents (e.g., Hindin, Morocco, Mott,
& Aguilar, 2007; Kochhar-Bryant, 2008; Martinez, 2010). Part of it is legislation setting
high standards for academic achievement and clear accountability systems for all students
(e.g., Love, 2009; U.S. Department of Education, 2010), and part of it is the continued
trend toward inclusive practices (Santoli, Sachs, Romey, & McClurg, 2008; Smith, 2007).
Second, examples of professionals' collaborative activities demonstrate that such
interactions occur both formally and informally. School leadership teams, middle school
teams, co-teaching teams, teams that meet to discuss students who are struggling to
learn, and consultative meetings are representative of the growth of formal structures and
activities in schools that rely on collaboration for success. Models emphasizing collabora-
tion such as these are described in detail later in this text. Meetings between teachers to
respond to immediate student needs and phone calls to parents are examples of informal
collaboration. Both types of collaboration are important. However, informal collaboration
often occurs whether or not a context for collaboration has been fostered and whether or
not any formal structures for collaboration are in place. Formal collaboration typically
requires that strong leadership has ensured that a collaborative school culture-one that
values collegial interactions-has been created.
Third, this text is based on the belief that collaboration is the common thread in
many current initiatives for school reform (McCoach et al., 2010). Collaboration is crucial
as educators move to implement RTI practices, differentiate instruction, meet standards
of accountability for student achievement as measured through high-stakes testing, and
design and implement local professional development strategies. Likewise, collaboration
is crucial as professionals work with the parents and families of their increasingly diverse
4 CHAPTER ONE
Collaborating with the parents and family members As a professional educator, you can enhance your inter-
of your students is one of your first responsibilities actions with diverse families by using strategies such as
as a professional educator, and doing this requires an the following:
understanding of the diversity and needs they rep-
l . Be sure to know the correct last name of every
resent. Ray (2005) offers some examples of family
parent, regardless of the family structure.
characteristics or circumstances and challenges that
2. Avoid language that implies that "family" refers
may arise.
only to traditional family structure.
3. Regardless of family structure, offer information to
• Single-parent families may experience a great deal
parents or caregivers on their children's strengths
of stress and isolation, and the children from these
and abilities.
families are more likely than other children to live
4. Avoid making requests that may place parents
in poverty.
in an uncomfortable position related to time or
• Blended families, in which parents have children
money. Some families cannot afford to contribute
from former relationships, may need time to
materials for classrooms, and some parents
bond and to resolve issues related to child
cannot come to conferences during typical school
rearing (e.g., discipline). Sibling rivalry also
hours or on a specific day; therefore, options and
may occur.
alternatives should be offered.
• Multigenerational families, in which grandparents,
5 . Remember that projects and activities that presume
great-grandparents, or other relatives care for
students are part of a traditional family may not
children, may face economic challenges, and the
be appropriate. For example, alternatives should
energy required to raise children may be daunting
be found to creating a family tree and making
for the caregiver.
Mother's Day gifts.
• Foster families are, by nature, temporary,
6 . In some cases-for example, when grandparents
and so the bonds may be a bit different from
or great-grandparents are raising children-you
those in other families; children in foster
may need to explain school procedures if these
families may experience stress because of not
caregivers are unfamiliar with them.
knowing exactly what the next steps in their
lives may be. Most important, all educators should reflect on their own
• Same-sex families often face societal beliefs about nontraditional families and set aside any
discrimination, and some teachers may feel assumptions they may have about them. Being positive
uncomfortable interacting with these parents. with students and families and being alert to and stop-
Legal issues related to topics such as access to ping teasing or bullying of students from these families
school records also may arise. are your responsibilities as a professional educator.
student groups. An initial illustration of this point is captured in Putting Ideas into Practice,
which explores challenges that families may face and ways educators may effectively inter-
act with them. Collaboration also is part of special education through initial referral and
assessment procedures, IEP development, service delivery approaches, conflict resolution,
and parent participation.
This book, then, is about effective interactions. It presents the universal concepts, princi-
ples, skills, and strategies that all school professionals can use to enhance their shared efforts
to educate their students. Although slight variations in practice may occur related to one's
FOUNDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES 5
Collaboration Concepts
The term collaboration is something of an educational buzzword. One can easily get the
sense that collaboration is viewed as the preferred approach in nearly any school situa-
tion. It is touted as the mechanism through which school reform can be accomplished
(Anderson-Butcher et a!., 2010; Dufour et a!., 2008; Sagor, 2009) and the instrument
through which diverse student needs can be met (Olivos, 2009; Sm1rez-Orozco, Onaga, &
de Lardemelle, 2010; van Garderen, Scheuermann ,jackson, & Hampton, 2009). Principals
are admonished to use a collaborative leadership style (e.g., Hines, 2008), and teachers are
encouraged to use collaboration to improve student outcomes (e.g., Garrett, 2010; Levine
& Marcus, 2007; Martinez, 2010/2011). Unfortunately, the term collaboration often is care-
lessly used and occasionally misapplied, as suggested in Figure l.l.
Despite all the current discussion about collaboration, definitions of the term have
remained unclear, which has contributed to confusion about its character and implemen-
tation. In fact, some dictionary definitions of collaboration include reference to treason or
working together for sinister purposes! ln education literature and practice, you may find
that collaboration either is used as a synonym for related but distinctly different concepts
addressed elsewhere in this book-including teaming, consultation, co-teaching, and
inclusion-or is not defined at all beyond a sense of working together (e.g., Gleckel &
Koretz, 2008; Kampwirth & Powers, 2012; Sagar, 2009). Because we firm ly believe that
a precise understanding of the term collaboration is far more than semantics, we begin by
carefully defining it. Knowing what collaboration is and is not and how it applies to school
initiatives and other applications can help you articulate your practices, set appropriate
expectations for yourself, and positively influence others to interact collaboratively.
FIGURE 1.1 Some of the many misunde rstandings about colla boration in schools.
yo- I Fotolia. com lnna Astakhova I Shutterstock vgstudio I Shutterstock kurhan I Shutterslock Christian Schwier I Fotolia.com
6 CHAPTER ONE
Definition
The term collaboration is used frequently in casual conversation, but it also has a technical
definition that characterizes it as a unique professional concept:
Interpersonal collaboration is a style for direct interaction between at least two coequal parties
voluntarily engaged in shared decision making as they work toward a common goal.
Notice that we call collaboration a style. In the same way that writers use various
styles to convey information to readers so, too, do individuals use interpersonal styles or
approaches in their interactions with one another. Some professionals may choose to be
directive when they interact; others may choose to be accommodative or facilitative; still
others may choose to be collaborative. At first glance, referring to collaboration as a style
may appear to detract from its significance by equating it with something ephemeral and
seemingly lacking in substance. However, using this definition enables you to distinguish
the nature of the interpersonal relationship-that is, collaboration-occurring during
shared interactions from the activities themselves, such as teaming, problem solving, or
co-teaching.
As just implied, because collaboration is a style of interaction, it cannot exist in isola-
tion. It can occur only when it is used by people who are engaged in a specific process, task,
or activity. To clarify this point, consider the following: If colleagues mentioned to you that
they were collaborating, would you know what they were doing? Probably not. They could
be collaboratively discussing strategies for supporting a student who has just enrolled at the
school, sharing the responsibilities for an academic lesson in a co-teaching arrangement,
or planning an interdisciplinary unit. What the term collaboration conveys is how the activ-
ity is occurring-that is, the nature of the interpersonal relationship occurring during the
interaction and the ways in which individuals are communicating with one another. Think
about this in relation to Ms. Maharrin, Mr. Mendez, and Mrs. Lee. In what activities are they
engaged? Are these activities likely candidates for collaboration?
direction and to function more as helpers than partners, and they were very discouraged
about changing this, given the strong cultural basis for the situation. Even gender may
sometimes be a factor in establishing parity, with either a male or a female educator per-
ceiving imbalance in the value attributed to the contribution. ln another example, think
about parity when professionals interact with parents from a culture different from theirs.
Who might be perceived as having the power to control the interaction? How might
parents communicate based on their perception of whether their contribution is valued?
Keep in mind that individuals may have parity as they work together on a specific col-
laborative activity even though they do not have parity in other situations. For example,
you may have parity in interactions with a paraprofessional to plan a community-based
activity, but you may interact directively and with appropriately greater authority and
decision-making power when giving instructions to the same paraprofessional about
working with students. Similarly, administrators and staff on a curriculum committee
may have parity; outside of the committee, though, the relationship among the members
may be marked ly different.
and to prepare several activities related to each. The teacher agrees to locate needed materi-
als and to plan student groupings and instructional schedules for the lessons. In this case,
you and the teacher are both actively participating in accomplishing the task, even though
the division of labor may not be equal.
The second component of responsibility concerns equal participation in the critical
decision making involved in the activity. In the example just described, you and the teacher
had different responsibilities for the task, but to be collaborative you must participate
equally in deciding the appropriateness of and possible needed adjustments in the mate-
rial you prepare, and you are equally responsible for deciding whether the grouping and
proposed schedule are workable.
Individuals Who Collaborate Share Accountability for Outcomes Whether the results
of collaboration are positive or negative, all the participating individuals are accountable
for the outcome. Suppose you and several colleagues plan a parent information meeting.
One person arranges for a room, another makes arrangements to provide coffee, and a
third reserves a media projector for the presentation. Shortly before the meeting is to
begin, you realize that no one has remembered to pick up the media projector. In a col-
laborative effort, all the professionals share the resulting need to change the program at
the last minute or to arrange to have someone dash to retrieve the projector. Similarly, if
10 CHAPTER ONE
A BASIS IN RESEARCH
Does Collaboration Improve Student Achievement?
Collaboration has intuitive appeal. That is, it seems to In a review of 23 studies spanning 15 years that
make sense that when school professionals work together, examined school districts that were improving, Shan-
student outcomes will improve and teachers will gain in- non and Bylsma (2004) found that four categories of
creased knowledge and skills. But is there any evidence to themes characterized these districts. In addition to qual-
support such ideas? A number of studies do indicate that ity teaching and learning, effective leadership, and sup-
collaboration makes a difference. Here are some examples. port for system-wide improvement, the authors reported
A study commissioned by the Center for School Im- that clear and collaborative relationships were essential.
provement in cooperation with the Office for Exceptional A nurturing professional culture, clear understanding of
Children, Ohio Department of Education, examined 30 professionals' roles and responsibilities, peer support and
Ohio school districts that had made significant improve- trust, and related characteristics were integral in these
ment in students' reading and math proficiency (Sil- districts.
verman, Hazelwood,&. Cronin, 2009). The researchers Additional research on collaboration is needed to
found that these districts emphasized strong leadership address topics such as the differences in collaborative ac-
that included shared leadership among professionals and tivities between exemplary and struggling schools, ways
principals, a strong collaborative culture and structures to build a collaborative culture when it does not exist,
to support collaboration (e.g., common planning), co- and strategies for sustaining such a culture.
teaching, and a priority on many types of teaming.
a school leadership team is meeting to discuss the results of the monthly student progress
data collected, but one member has not finished compiling his part of the results, the team
is accountable for rescheduling the meeting date or for assisting the member aggregating
the information.
The examples just given relate to the outcomes of the shared work. However, in today's
schools a second type of discussion of outcomes is equally important-that is, outcomes
related to students. One question sometimes asked is whether collaboration makes a dif-
ference for students. The studies described in A Basis i.n Research address that question.
Emergent Characteristics
Several characteristics of collaboration can have multiple functions-they are mentioned
both as prerequisites for as well as outcomes of collaboration. We refer to these as emer-
gent characteristics. These characteristics must be present to some discernible degree at
the outset of collaborative activity, but they typically grow and flourish from successful
experience with collaboration.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.