29 CRL.M.C.

6203/2022 Petition U/s 482 of CrPC seeking

quashing of F.I.R U/s 376/506
IPC
Facts:- Petitioner and R2 become
friends through Facebook. R2 later
came India to attend birthday of her
friend on 12.10.2019 where P put
her under influence of drugs and
had intercourse with her without
consent.
Later P said he will marry her.
FIR registered on 27.01.2022 and
Chargesheet filed on 30/05/2022
Anticipatory Bail granted by Trial
court on 30.09.2022
Grounds
Allegations are false. Consent was
taken. Inconsistency in the
statement of the complainant.
30 CRL.M.C. 6300/2022 Petition for quashing of FIR u/s
498A/406/34 IPC where in
settlement is made.
Fact: Both the parties got married
on 26.03.2024 before the court of
Jeddah in Saudi Arabia. Baby girl
was born out of the wedlock.
FIR registered on 04.01.2018 u/s
498A/406/34 IPC.
Anticipatory Bail to petitioner by
LD. ADJ on 18.12.2020.
On 17.08.2022 both parties
amicably settled the dispute before
sessions judge. Petitioner will pay
15 Lacs to the R2 (wife).
31 CRL.M.C 6582/2022 Petition for quashing of FIR u/s
498A/406/34 of IPC.
Facts:- Marriage on 16.02.2010.
2 female child out of the wedlock.
Matrimonial dispute started from
the first day of marriage. All the
petitioners tortured the wife for
more dowry.
FIR filed on 18.10.2019.
Grounds
P1 lives in Mumbai and P2 lives at
Tanda, no involvement in the
offence.
P3,P4 & P5 are the married sister of
husband and no involvement in the
 offence.
P6 is the bother in law of the
husband hence no involvement in
the offence.
32 CRL.M.C 6924/2022 Petition for quashing of the FIR
U/s 323/341/506/34 and the
Chargesheet dt. 10.11.2017.
Facts. Petitioner and complainant
are neighbours. On 14.12.2014
petitioner allegedly twisted
complainant’s hand and slapped her
many times. 15 mins Later
petitioner and her daughter again
allegedly beat complainant and
threatened to kill her.
On 17.08.2019 complainant
voluntarily compounded/settled,
before Ld. ACMM(W) and she
has no objection if the accused is
acquitted.
33 CRL.M.C. 7066-2022 Petition under Art.227,
impugning order and Judgement
dt. 17.11.2022 passed by Ld. ASJ.
along with disposing Criminal
Appeal.
Facts:- Wife of Petitioner filed DV
complaint against her husband and
allegedly swore on two
Diametrically opposite affidavit
related to her income. Petitioner
filed an appeal U/s 341 CrPc
before the ASJ challenging the
income affidavit of the wife, filed
in the Dv act complaint.
Ld. ASJ Dismissed the appeal.
Grounds for Impugning
Judgement of ASJ.
Disregarding the sufficient
34 CRL. MC NO. Petition of quashing of FIR U/S ofincriminating
279/337/338 material
IPC on reecord
392/2024 FACTS: In accident which took place on 13.04.2023, grievous
injuries sustained by the injured/ petitioner in a road vehicular
accident by a vehicle
driven rashly and negligently by respondent no.1, owned by
respondent no. 2 and insured with respondent no. 3.
FIR was registered on 13.04.2023. 06.03.2024
Date of Settlement award: 14.10.2023
Lower Court passed a Advance settlement award which stated that
Respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2 and respondent no.3 have
agreed to pay compensation in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- and
Rs.80,000/- respectively to the petitioner/injured towards the full and
final settlement of the claim.
GROUNDS: Dispute settled by settlement award.
35 CRL.REV.P. 353/2018 Petition u/s 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. against the impugned order dated 25.01.2018
passed by court of District & Sessions Judge, West District, TIS HAZARI in
Appeal No. 89/2017.
Settlement agreement was made on 25.02.2020.
Facts – Pet. & R1 married on 10.08.1976. R1 has filed an application u/s 23
DV Act which was dismissed and held against the Pet. directing him to pay
Rs. 5k per month
By vide order dated 08.05.2018 – The matter was referred to Mediation by
order dated 08.05.2018 but it was not settled.
Grounds – Poor financial condition due to heart problem.
R1 is not entitled as she has sufficient source of income.
Nothing on record to prove monthly income.
Order – The Appeal filed by the Petitioner in Appeal No. 89/2017 was partly
allowed whereby the interim maintenance was modified from Rs. 5k to 4k per
month.
36 CRL.REV.P. 718/2018 Petition u/s 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. against the impugned order dated 13.07.2018
passed by ASJ, KKD Court thereby dismissing the Criminal Appeal No.
271/2016 arising out of order dated 20.07.2017 & 26.07.2017 passed in
Criminal Complaint No. 696/2004.
Facts - There was a Industrial Dispute which was transferred to Industrial
Tribunal and the award was passed on 11.12.1997 in favor of workmen.
Grounds - The Petitioner is not responsible for the dues of worker as from
03.11.1996 till date, company was sealed.
Order – The Petitioner had to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of
six months and to pay fine of Rs. 10,50,000/-

37 CRL.REV.P. 96/2022 Petition u/s 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. against the impugned order dated 23.11.2021
passed by ASJ, KKD Court in FIR No. 288/2017 u/s 376 IPC for setting aside
of the order on charge.
Facts – Pet. & Complainant engaged on 11.09.2016 and the date for marriage
decided was 07.05.2017. The marriage proposal was called off on
30.03.2017. Complainant lodged a complaint on 05.05.2017. Pet. marriage
was solemnized on 28.07.2017. On 30.09.2016, he forcefully kissed me and
on 27.03.2017, he forcefully made sexual relations.
FIR lodged on 02.08.2017. Chargesheet was filed on 104.10.2017
Charges framed on 25.11.2021
2 Accused Asha & Vipin Mittal were discharged on 23.11.2021 u/s 3-4
Dowry Prohibition Act.
Grounds – Unexplained delay in lodging false complaint. False Allegations.
Complainant has refused for internal medical examination
Order – On 23.11.2021, 2 Accused Asha & Vipin Mittal were discharged on
23.11.2021 u/s 3-4 Dowry Prohibition Act.
Charges be framed accordingly.

38 CRL.REV.P. 306/2022 Petition u/s 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. against the order of cognizance and
summoning order dated 01.07.2021, order on charge dated 29.10.2021 and
Framing of Charge dated 24.12.2021 against the Petitioner.
Facts –Pet. has joined company on 10.12.2014 as Senior VP and retired on
31.12.2016. The Pet. provide the ‘sale bill factoring facility to its various
clients. On 07.02.2013 – Pet. sanctioned limit to 10cr and further enhanced to
20 cr. Complaint done on 09.02.2018. FIR No. 219/2018 was registered on
 25.04.2018. Chargesheet was filed by CBI on 08.04.2021
Grounds – Vide order dated 30.12.2020 sanctioning authority has declined to
grant sanction. 10.03.2021 – sanctioning authority unlawfully reviewed and
sanctioned the same material. Pet. was not even charge-sheeted by the CBI.
39 CRL.REV.P. 516/2022 Petition u/s 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. seeking revision of order dated 11.04.2022
passed by ASJ, Rohini Court in bearing Criminal Appeal No. 12/2021 u/s 29
of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Facts – Marriage bet. the Pet & Resp.was solemnized on 04.02.2016 and this
was the 2nd marriage. After 7 months Resp. left the matrimonial house due to
domestic violence and on 07.04.2017 filed the Complaint Case No. 4682 of
2017.On 24.12.2020 the Ld. MM passed an order to pay interim Rs. 30k to
Resp. Appeal field by Pet. on 03.02.2021.
Grounds – Total salry was Rs. 75k but after deductions Pet. receives Rs.
67.50K. Pet. is under obligation to secure saving for future marriage of
daughter from ex-wife.
Has liability of 2 sisters. Suppression of material fact by Resp.
Order – The Appeal filed by the Petitioner herein was partially allowed
whereby Ld. ASJ reduced the interim maintenance amount payable to the
Respondent (Wife) to Rs. 25k from Rs. 30k per month.
40 CRL.REV.P. 683/2022 Petition u/s 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by ASJ,
THC in C.A.No. 253/2019
Facts – FIR No. 125/2009 u/s 279/304A/471 IPC.
Pet. was found driving a truck with forged DL and in rash & negligent manner
and pedestrian Yashpal (deceased.Pet. filed the Appeal on 03.10.2019 and the
same was dismissed on 22.09.2022. Pet. is in jail since 22.09.2022
The Ld. Trial Court vide order dated 25.7.2019 and order on sentence
dated 7.9.2019 has convicted and sentenced the petitioner
Grounds – No legal evidenc.Prosecution has miserably failed to prove the
ingredients of alleged section. No Eye witness.
Order - Ld. Trial Court has sentenced the Pet. herein to simple imprisonment
for 3 months u/s 279 IPC, simple imprisonment for 6 months u/s 304A/ 471
IPC and Pet. directed to pay Rs. 40 K to the wife of the deceased. Impugned
Judgment dated 25.07.2019 and order on sentence dated 07.09.2019 was
upheld.
Item no. 41 CRL.REV.P. 808/2022 Petition for revision of order dt. 28.04.2022 by which the
accused was discharged from prosecution.

Facts: The accused / respondent defrauded the bank by

dishonestly diverting the loan money on the basis of
forged invoices.
Grounds in Petition: No fresh material was required as
there was no question of reconsideration of sanction for
prosecution.
Item no. 42 CRL.REV.P. 910/2022 Petition for revision of impugned judgement dt.
19.12.2022 and 23.12.2022 by which the conviction was
Order dt. 28.12.2022: upheld and the order on sentence modified.
Interim stay on
sentence of the Facts: The deceased died in an accident by coming
petitioner. under a truck driven by the revisionist.
Grounds in petition:
- That the deceased climbed the truck and fell by
his own negligent act.
- No evidence that the driver was drunk.
Item no. 43 W.P.(CRL) 65/2024 LDOH: 08.01.2024

Item no. 44 W.P.(CRL) 217/2024 LDOH: 21.02.2024

Item no. 45 CRL.REV.P. 568/2022 LDOH: 05.01.2024

WITH -
CRL.REV.P. 661/2022
CRL.REV.P. 703/2022
CRL.REV.P. 728/2022
CRL.REV.P. 850/2022
CRL.REV.P. 72/2023
Item no. 51 W.P.(C) 7455/2014 LDOH: 14.02.2024