Professional Documents
Culture Documents
At the 2015 Oscars, rapper Common and singer John Legend accepted
the award for best original song for “Glory” from the film Selma (2014),
which dramatizes the 1965 voting rights marches. In their acceptance
speech, Common alluded to the bridge that the civil rights and free-
dom march, led by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee,
the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr., passed over:
Common’s small tribute toward the 2014 Umbrella Movement was warmly
embraced by supporters of the protest, and the legendary rapper’s name
went viral on Hong Kong social media (Wertime, 2015). Many cultures
and nations, including Hong Kong, have a history of utilizing rap and
Hip-Hop as forms of resistance for marginalized movements and groups
(Bonnette 2015). Curiously, Common’s nod was one of the only Hip-
257
The Low Mays and the Transgression of Wo Lei Fei Fei 259
Liberation Army (Wong, 2013). The principle was then extended to the
rejection of indecent or discriminatory language, and served as a fun-
damental tenet of pro-democratic protests in Hong Kong. It has been
argued that the importance and influence of wo lei fei fei lie in its strict
adherence to righteous moral values: “If a sociopolitical movement
for a just cause involves injustice (e.g., discrimination and violence),
the movement will be contradicting itself” (Szeto, 2014, translation my
own). In fact, the full name of Occupy Central was “Occupy Central with
Love and Peace.” Such an emphasis on nonviolence was largely inspired
by the acts of civil disobedience of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther
King Jr. in their respective political struggles (Lee and Chan, 2018).
According to Benny Tai, one of the initiators of Occupy Central, break-
ing the law does not equate to breaching the rule of law (Lee and Chan,
2018). Accordingly, the idea was promoted that all participants of the
occupation would peacefully, rationally, and nonviolently turn them-
selves into the police and face all judicial penalties by the end of the
occupation, which is consistent with the principles of nonviolent direct
action (Lee and Chan, 2018).
As the tension between Hong Kong and China intensified to new
heights in the 2010s, there was growing discontent with adhering to the
indisputable status of wo lei fei fei. Sociologist Lui Tai-lok (2017) observes
that the lack of substantial progress in Hong Kong’s pro-democracy
movement has led to a type of “laziness” (do sing) among its leaders.
Rather than proactively seeking systemic changes of democracy within
an undemocratic establishment, pro-democratic leaders seem to be con-
cerned only about playing the role of the “oppositional party” within the
institution. In order to maintain their status as the “voice of the people,”
pro-democratic factions have focused their efforts on adhering to righ-
teous and moral discourses that can appeal to their peaceful supporters
and voters, rather than fighting for democratic change. As early as 2011,
Wan Chin, a former university professor and the “father of Hong Kong
city-statism,” harshly condemned wo lei fei fei as a form of “brainwash-
ing” and an invisible “shackle” that was holding back a real uprising
in Hong Kong. For Wan Chin, violence is never the binary opposite of
rational thinking. He cites as a case in point the 1911 Xinhai Revolution,
which led to the collapse of three thousand years of imperial rule in
China. In face of a powerful tyranny, violence becomes a rational resolu-
tion for protesters (Wan Chin, 2011).
For these reasons, Wan Chin is a vocal proponent of “valiant resis-
tance” (yung mou kong jang), which is comparable to Malcolm X’s
The Low Mays and the Transgression of Wo Lei Fei Fei 261
use of curse words and vulgarity in select songs has provoked immense
social backlash for leading Hong Kong youths astray. As observed by
one critic, LMF “must be connected with vulgarity and deviance” in the
eyes of the mainstream (Chan, 2002). This may no longer be the case
in present-day Hong Kong, but during the early 2000s, LMF was at the
center of a moral panic that was eerily similar to mainstream America’s
response to gangsta rap. For Tricia Rose, gangsta rap played a major role
in “the near-depletion of what was once a vibrant, diverse, and complex
popular genre, wringing it dry by pandering to America’s racist and sex-
ist lowest common denominator” (2008, p. 2).
Ever since the emergence of LMF, Hong Kong society has associated
rap music with politics, particularly envisioning rap as synonymous with
social protest. Such an assumption was revisited when an online debate
ensued after a popular blogger in Hong Kong claimed that “Hip-Hop is
the disharmonic and protest voice of the post-war generation” and LMF
is Hong Kong’s only “real” Hip-Hop artists (Loud, 2013). Hong Kong
rapper MastaMic responded in the same blog post by stating that Hip-
Hop is a highly diverse and fluid musical genre, and can never be catego-
rized by singular traits like “social protest” (Loud, 2013). Although Hong
Kong rappers are well aware that rap with political messages is only one
of many subgenres of Hip-Hop, they have consistently included politi-
cal rap songs in their body of work. One of MastaMic’s mixtapes is aptly
titled Justice Is What I Rap For (2012), which features songs like “Fight to
Vote,” and “Wealth Envy.” Some of his latest songs, like “Jungle” (2018),
portray the symbolic violence and “survival of the fittest” of Hong Kong
society through the lens of a wild jungle. In the past decade, he has
also released an annual music series, Rap Up, which summarizes Hong
Kong’s key news and developments of the year. The Umbrella Movement
was one of many events that was covered in “Rap Up 2015.” The Hip-Hop
collective Bakerie are touted as the next big thing in Hong Kong Hip-
Hop, thanks to a string of trap-influenced singles like “Spending HKD,
Raking in RMB” (2014) and “Li Ka Shing” (2017) that critique Hong
Kong’s culture of greed and materialism. One of the more successful
attempts to challenge Hong Kong listeners’ conflation of rap and politi-
cal rap is the rap duo FAMA, which specializes in Cantopop-influenced
and relatively apolitical rap songs that appeal to the Hong Kong main-
stream audience. Although FAMA has accumulated fifty awards through-
out its career, many in competition against A-list pop stars in Hong Kong
(“Artist Profile: FAMA,” 2018), it has yet to dethrone LMF’s position as
the representative of “authentic” Hong Kong Hip-Hop.
The Low Mays and the Transgression of Wo Lei Fei Fei 263
from “Raise the Umbrella” is a stylistic choice, it seems odd that the writ-
ers of the song did not take advantage of Hong Kong rap’s attentiveness
to social justice mobilization, celebration of local cultural identity, and
association with the youth generation.
I argue that the absence of rap music in the Umbrella Movement
is partly due to Hong Kong mainstream audience’s expectations of rap
as an angry, violent, and curse-laden cultural form. Since the Umbrella
Movement had been guided by the principle of wo lei fei fei, the main-
stream faction of the Umbrella Movement consciously or subconsciously
marginalized the participation of Hong Kong Hip-Hop, so as to avoid
any tampering with the peace-loving image of the pro-democracy move-
ment. Returning to the protest songs of the Umbrella Movement, we
can see that the majority of them focused on encouraging demonstra-
tors and expressing solidarity in face of Chinese and Hong Kong state
repression. There is a glaring absence of songs that directly challenge
the “enemy” of the Umbrella Movement: the CCP or even the Hong
Kong government.
It is also worth questioning whether Hong Kong rappers them-
selves were prone to such self-restraint or even self-censorship during
the Umbrella Movement. In a 2013 interview, roughly a year before the
Umbrella Movement, MastaMic disagreed with local recording artists
who claimed to “hate politics,” yet he also expressed his reluctance to
be a “martyr for democracy” (Hong Kong Apple Daily Reporter, 2013).
MastaMic is alluding to how Occupy Central emphasized a spirit of
self-sacrifice for the larger cause of Hong Kong democracy. Although
MastaMic does not elaborate on this remark, it is likely that he is refer-
ring to the threat to the business side of his career as a full-time musi-
cian. Denise Ho, a hugely popular singer in Hong Kong, for example,
revealed that 80 percent of her income came from sources affiliated with
mainland China and has vanished since her high-profile participation
of the Umbrella Movement (Griffiths, 2017). The cost of expressing a
political opinion that is unpopular in mainland China is too great for the
Hong Kong creative industry.
Considering how Hong Kong rap music is already a marginal indus-
try, it is understandable why Hong Kong rappers did not take a proactive
role in the Umbrella Movement, let alone transgress the movement’s
principles of peace and love. It is against the above backdrop that I
examine the post–Umbrella Movement popularity of the parody rap
group the Low Mays.
The Low Mays and the Transgression of Wo Lei Fei Fei 265
democracy on Chinese soil, in exchange for his ascent to the class of the
nouveau riche. The lyrics and delivery arguably contain discriminatory
elements toward mainland Chinese, and do not comply with the peace-
loving standards of wo lei fei fei. Yet such is the transgression of politi-
cal correctness that the Low Mays are engaged in. As Crème Supreme
remarks in an interview, “The Low Mays are not toeing the fine line of
politically correctness. They are absolutely politically incorrect” (Hong
Kiu, 2017, translation my own).
The song “Marx” is one of the Low Mays’ most ambitious parodic
assaults against the CCP. Rapping over the instrumental of “Sneakin”
(2016) by Drake and 21 Savage, emcee Matt Da Bospel, whose name plays
on the biblical Gospel of Matthew, begins his verse with a braggadocio
couplet: “Matt Da Bospel is greater than Marx / He is so rich that Marx
the thinker becomes Marx the beggar.” These two lines are significant, as
they establish the song’s premise as a deviance rather than an adherence
to Marxist thought. Conventional wisdom suggests that the CCP is based
upon Maoism, which is Mao’s reading of Marxism. However, Maoism is
more accurately described as a product of Marxism-Leninism: Leninism’s
emphasis on seizing and holding power, in the name of Marxist-inspired
ideals, is precisely a defining feature of Mao’s involvement in modern
Chinese history. As Matt Da Bospel proclaims in the hook of the song:
“We are evolving each time we pekyau / You are still an ape / I’m covered
with tats and I ain’t done yet / I don’t care about your livelihood.” Hence
the notion of power struggle akin to gangster turf wars becomes an over-
arching theme throughout the song. In the second verse, emcee Healthy
Wah further illuminates the exploitation of Marxism as a means to seiz-
ing power: “Matt Da Bospel chooses his words carefully / I am Marx. To
fucking hell with the democratic movement / No universities shall be
allowed to build libraries / Burn all the books and bury all the scholars.”
Instead of following Marxist historical determinism, the Democratic
Fullham Alliance, as an extension of the CCP, proactively seizes and con-
solidates power through the silencing of different voices and censoring
of information. While this is not to say that mainland Chinese society is
under absolute censorship, China is ranked 176th out of 180 countries in
terms of its press freedom (Reporters Without Borders, 2018).
Conclusion
With descriptions of tattoos, violence, and lust of power, the Low Mays
use gangster imagery to evoke the listener’s imagination of Maoism
The Low Mays and the Transgression of Wo Lei Fei Fei 267
taken to the extreme. Through this two-tier parody, the Low Mays are
exposing the hypocrisy behind the CCP’s Marxist ideals of equality and
liberation of the imperialized nations as thug-like. While the Chinese
Communist Party and the pro-Beijing Hong Kong government con-
stantly reassure Hong Kongers and observers of Hong Kong that the
city maintains a high degree of autonomy, the facts suggest otherwise.
It is precisely this hypocrisy that Hong Kongers, and especially the par-
ticipants in the Umbrella Movement, are so repulsed by. The Low Mays
do not resort to the peace-loving yet self-restraining principle of wo lei
fei fei, nor do they adopt an angry and righteous approach of protest.
Instead, the Low Mays’ parody rap offers a more personal, vivid, and
sophisticated insight about the tension between Hong Kong and CCP. In
this sense, I consider the Low Mays’ Triadism as filling the gaping hole in
political rap that strikes at the heart of Hong Kong’s democratic move-
ment and its plights.
As I have mentioned, the dual pressures of political and economic fac-
tors mean it is difficult for political rap about China to survive in Hong
Kong. Despite generating much excitement in the Hong Kong indepen-
dent cultural scene with their parody of mainland Chinese encroach-
ment, the Low Mays have not followed up Triadism with more political
rap about Hong Kong–China relations. Instead, their subsequent two
releases, Fulham Space Station (2018) and Life Winners (2019) have saw
them parodying other Hong Kong sociocultural issues like the world-
leading poverty gap, internet phenomena like the flat-earth movement
and TED talks, and even themselves as Hong Kong pop superstars. After
several sold-out shows in Hong Kong’s most prestigious underground
venues, the Low Mays performed alongside Hip-Hop superstars like
Erykah Badu and Khalid at the 2018 Clockenflap Music Festival.
Despite the change in lyrical direction, the Low Mays appeared that
their popularity would only continue to grow. However, during the
peak of the 2019 Anti-Extradition protest (also known as the “Water
Revolution”), the Low Mays frontman Crème Supreme was embroiled
in an online controversy for an Instagram post that was interpreted by
netizens as promoting political apathy, and even supporting Communist
Chinese oppression. Although the Low Mays and Crème Supreme
quickly clarified their stance as pro-free speech rather than pro-
Communist China, the Low Mays failed to regain their momentum in
the Hong Kong Hip-Hop scene. If the dramatic rise and fall of the Low
Mays are any indication of the future of Hong Kong Hip-Hop, it appears
that political rap in Hong Kong will continue to flourish. Whether such
Notes
1. The first batch of Hong Kong rap songs that impacted mainstream culture
is arguably by the comedic duo SoftHard. The duo’s songs, featuring radio hosts
Eric Kwok and Jan Lamb, covered a range of social issues, including consumer-
ism, fetishism, drug abuse, and sexual diseases. See Li, 2006, pp. 20–22; and
Chu, 2017, p. 138.
2. Coincidentally, members of the pioneering gangsta rap group N.W.A,
including Ice Cube, were also brought up in middle-class families. It is worth fur-
ther exploring whether socioeconomic class allows rappers to have a greater dis-
tance from their subject matters, and therefore more creative space for portrayal.
3. Aji Ichiban is a chain store in Hong Kong that sells snacks imported from
all across East Asia, but particularly Japan.
References
The Low Mays and the Transgression of Wo Lei Fei Fei 269
Kay, J. (2015, February 23). Oscars 2015: What the winners said. ScreenDaily.
https://www.screendaily.com/awards/oscars-2015-what-the-winners-said/50
83522.article
King, M. L., Jr. (1956, November 14) Address to MIA mass meeting at Holt Street
Baptist Church, 14 Nov 1956. The Martin Luther King, Jr. Papers Project. http://
okra.stanford.edu/transcription/document_images/Vol03Scans/424_14
-Nov-1956_Address%20to%20MIA%20Mass%20Meeting.pdf
Lee, F. L. M. and J. M. Chan (2018). Media and protest logics in the digital era: The
Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. New York: Oxford University Press.
Li, Wai-chung (2006). The emergence and development of Hong Kong hip-hop
and rap music since the 1980s (MPhil thesis, Chinese University of Hong
Kong).
Loud, L. (2013, February 25). Rich people doing hip-hop. Dadazim. http://dada
zim.com/journal/2013/02/shit-world/.
Lui, T. L. (2017, December 21). The past and present of the democrats. Master
Insights. https://www.master-insight.com/%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB%E6
%B4%BE%E7%9A%84%E5%89%8D%E4%B8%96%E4%BB%8A%E7%94
%9F/
Reporters Without Borders (2018). 2018 World Press Freedom Index. Reporters
Without Borders. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/ranking
Rose, T. (2008). The hip-hop wars: What we talk about when we talk about hip-hop–and
why it matters. New York: BasicCivitas Books.
Rühlig, T. (2016). “Do You Hear the People Sing” “Lift Your Umbrella?”: Under-
standing Hong Kong’s pro-democratic Umbrella Movement through You-
Tube music videos. China Perspectives 2016(4), 59–68.
Sage, V. (2011). Parody and pastiche. In Peter Melville Logan (gen. ed.), The
Encyclopedia of the Novel, vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 975–977.
Szeto, M. M. (2014, November 5). The operating logics and relations of district
movements, social movements, and political movements. Thinking Hong Kong
5, 14. http://commons.ln.edu.hk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&contex
t=thinkinghk
Wan Chin (2011, May 24). I am rational, I am therefore valiant. AM730. http://ar
chive.am730.com.hk/column-57300
Wertime, D. (2015, February 23). From China, love and hate for Common’s
Oscar speech. Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/02/23/china
-hong-kong-protests-common-oscars/
Wong, R. Y. M. (2013, February 28). The voice of the proletariat: From “wo lei
fei” to “wo lei fei fei.” The Sun. http://the-sun.on.cc/cnt/news/20130228
/00418_005.html
Discography