Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/334261193
CITATIONS READS
3 351
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by William Finnegan on 02 July 2021.
william.finnegan@nuigalway.ie
Abstract. In recent years, wind energy has become the leading source of renew-
able energy as the world strives to remove its reliance on fossil fuels. With the
growing demand for wind energy, wind farms have begun to move offshore and
the size of the average wind turbine has increased (up to 10MW). However, as a
result of these advances, additional challenges are presented – one of the most
significant being leading edge erosion on wind turbine blades. This erosion re-
quires additional maintenance, while lowering a turbine’s annual energy produc-
tion by up to 25%, which needs to be eliminated, or significantly reduced, if off-
shore wind energy is to become competitive within global energy markets. To
this end, in this paper, the methodology proposed in LEAPWind, a new collabo-
rative European research project, which aims to prevent blade leading-edge ero-
sion by employing advanced composite materials and innovative manufacturing
processes has been presented. An advanced thermoplastic-epoxy composite ma-
terial is used to manufacture a leading edge component for a wind turbine blade.
The critical technical stages, including material identification and characterisa-
tion, component design and manufacture have been discussed. Additionally, the
details relating to de-risking of the novel technologies through mechanical and
rain erosion testing, and full-scale operational trials on a 2.1MW wind turbine,
located in an onshore wind farm in Portugal, has been included. The results of
this study, will not only have social and economic benefits, but also a significant
environmental impact as it will allow for the manufacture of a more sustainable
wind turbine blade.
1 Introduction
As the world moves to a more sustainable way of living, the leading source of renewa-
ble energy is wind energy, where, by 2020, the global capacity is expected to nearly
double to 650.8GW [1]. As the wind energy industry grows, increasingly more wind
farms are being developed offshore due to favourable social and environmental factors
compared to onshore. With this development in the sector, wind turbine blades are now
become much larger with the increased resource and the need for fewer turbines, where
the average capacity of wind turbines installed in European waters has doubled, from
2MW in 2000 to 4MW in 2014 and SEIMENS Gamesa announced their 10MW (193
diameter wind turbine) this year [2].
However, with larger turbines comes additional challenges - as blade tip speeds ap-
proach 500km/hr, erosion of the leading-edge of the wind turbine blade begins to occur
very early (within 5 years) of the blades design life (typically 20-25 years). This be-
comes an even more paramount issue for offshore wind as access to turbines is limited
and the cost of maintenance increases ten-fold compared to onshore wind turbine
blades. Additionally, this erosion has a knock on effect on the performance of the wind
turbine as it can reduce the annual energy production of a wind turbine by between 2%
and 25% [3].
A comprehensive review of the existing methods for addressing leading edge erosion
of wind turbine blades was compiled in 2013 by Keegan at al. [4]. Currently, a number
of leading edge protection methods that are designed to be applied to the completed
wind turbine blade are available, which include tapes, paints and coatings [5]. Initially,
the protective coatings were made from epoxy or polyester but over time, these rigid
coatings were found to be inadequate and more ductile materials, such as polypropylene
and polyurethane, were necessary. In recent years, manufacturers have moved towards
multi-layered solutions, which can be designed to optimise performance and as a means
of assessing the durability of the protection system. In general, leading edge protection
methods can be divided into two categories: in-mould and post-mould solutions [4,6].
The in-mould solutions are applied directly to the matrix substrate, using painting or
spraying. These coating are typically rigid, brittle and have a high modulus, compared
to the more flexible coatings, such as polyurethane [4], that are used for the post-mould
solutions. The post-mould protective systems are typically multi-layer systems with the
inclusion of filler and primer layers between the laminate substrate and surface coating.
These methods provide additional protection from erosion during operation but usually
require replace during the design life of the blade and this replacement becomes more
regular in larger wind turbine blades. In addition, there are a number of products de-
signed for maintenance of eroded wind turbine blade leading edge. These are usually
in the form of spray foams or fillers, which are costly to apply even for onshore wind
turbines.
2 Methodology
Fig. 1. Overview of the methodological approach employed to develop the new wind blade com-
ponent
grips. Examples of material specimens that have been mechanically and rain erosion
tested are shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Material specimens that have been mechanically tested (left) and rain erosion tested (right;
[6])
The results of this testing campaign will form part of the decision process involved
in the selection of the most suitable thermoplastic material, which is discussed in Sec-
tion 3.1.
veloped during this study is shown in Fig. 3 using ANSYS DesignModeler. Addition-
ally, the finite element model will also be used to model the blade component element
demonstrators that will be produced and tested during the project. This will allow for
the initial validation of the model and, therefore, improve its performance.
The finite element model will initially be used in the design of the wind blade com-
ponent but it will also be used during the structural health monitoring of the component
will in operation. This will allow the wind turbine operator to predict the performance
and response of the component and feed into the on-site decision making processes.
During the mechanical testing and operational trials within the project, any discrepan-
cies between the model and the physical testing will be investigated and the model will
be updated throughout the project in order to improve its reliability.
Fig. 3. Schematic of the new wind blade component that will be developed during this study,
which has been illustrated using ANSYS DesignModeler
is discussed in Section 3.1. The finite element model, which is discussed in Section 3.3,
will also be used within the design of the new component.
Once the new leading edge blade component is design, manufacturing trials will take
place in order to de-risk the more complicated aspects of the build. Included in this will
be the manufacture and mechanical testing of a representative demonstrator, which will
be used to further de-risk the component design, the manufacture process and the finite
element model. This will ensure that any costly mistakes on the full-scale mould or
other problems will be eliminated prior to the manufacture of the full-scale blade com-
ponent.
The next stage in the production of the full-scale blade component is the manufacture
of the mould tooling that the component will be built on. Firstly, a pattern for this mould
is manufactured using a CAD model of the component outer profile that is inputted into
a computer numerical control (CNC) machine. The accuracy in this CAD model, and
subsequent CNC manufacture of the pattern, is paramount in the production of a high-
performance part. Once the pattern is completed, the mould tooling will be cast on the
pattern and it will be designed to provide the recommended manufacturing process win-
dow (vacuum level, temperature distribution along mould and through laminate thick-
ness, heat-up time and power, dwell time and cooling rates). Testing of the heated
mould tooling will be performed to ensure that it is fit for purpose and reliable for full-
scale, volume production, which ensures that the process can be completed in the future
in as an efficient and environmentally friendly way as possible.
The full-scale blade component will be manufactured using the final blade compo-
nent design and the mould tooling. To this end, rolls of glass-fibre will be impregnated
with a powder epoxy and then kitted (or cut into plies). The outer layers of the compo-
nent will be comprised of the selected thermoplastic material, which is discussed in
Section 3.1. These outer layers will eliminate the risk of leading edge erosion during
operation. The leading edge sub-components will be heated in an oven to 50OC at which
point they solidify but do not cross polymerise. Subsequently, these sub-components
will be assembled together in the full-scale mould and cured to 180OC under vacuum.
Following the cure, the component will be de-moulded, visually inspected and non-
destructive testing will be performed in order to ensure that it is of the highest standard
and there are no defects.
IEC61400-23 [24], where actuators will be equally spaced along the length of the blade
component to impose the loading on the component. The test loads applied during the
mechanical testing campaign will be derived from actual loads applied to the wind tur-
bine blades in operation.
Fig. 4. The Large Structures Test Cell at NUI Galway, showing the test cell (left) and a blade
component during a mechanical fatigue test (right)
During the static testing, the blade will be tested to the maximum predicted loads
envisaged during operation, where loads will be applied in incremental steps of 5% of
the maximum predicted operational load. The static testing will be monitored using a
combination of strain gauges, LVDTs and a digital image correlation (DIC) strain
measurement system. The data obtained during the physical test will be post-processed
and will be compared with the results predicted by the finite element model. The key
static testing cases are the flapwise and edgewise bending tests and the test data will
confirm the stiffness distribution, natural frequency and strength of the blade. Follow-
ing this, the fatigue testing will take place, where the blade component prototype will
be tested in tension-tension fatigue loading within an R value of 0.1. Learnings from
execution of the static test procedure will be inform the fatigue testing. The test loads
will be based on operational learnings from the current SUZLON wind turbines, from
coupon data, from static test results and from the updated finite element model. Up to
1,000,000 cycles of fatigue load cycles will be applied to the blade to demonstrate its
fatigue strength and durability.
Once the mechanical testing campaign is complete, the results will be analysed and
fed back into the design and manufacture of the commercial components. Additionally,
the finite element model will be updated based on these results.
Fig. 5. Penamacor Wind Farm in Portugal, where the operational trials for the new wind blade
component will take place
Following the operational trials, the results will be analysed and reported to the pro-
ject partners, the steering committee and the European Commission. Additionally, the
results will be compared to the results from the physical testing and finite element mod-
els and this analysis will be included in the operational trials report. Following this, a
concise summary of these results will be disseminated to key project stakeholders, the
research community and members of the general public in the form of a peer-reviewed
publication in a high impact journal.
4 Conclusion
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Executive Agency for Small and Medium sized Enter-
prises (EASME) in the European Commission through the LEAPWind project (Agree-
ment no.: EASME/EMFF/2017/1.2.1.12/S1/06/SI2.789307). The first and last authors
would like to acknowledge the support from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), through
the Marine and Renewable Energy Ireland (MaREI) research centre (Grant no.
12/RC/2302), and the Career Development Award programme (Grant No.
13/CDA/2200).
References
1. Conroy, J.: World wind power to almost double to 650GW by 2020, The Australian
(21/01/2015)
2. SEIMENS Gamesa Newroom, http://www.siemensgamesa.com/en-int/news-
room/2019/01/new-siemens-gamesa-10-mw-offshore-wind-turbine-sg-10-0-193-dd, last
accessed 2019/03/01
3. Budinski, K.G.: Guide to friction, wear and erosion testing. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM international (2007)
4. Keegan, M.H., Nash, D.H., Stack, M.M.: On Erosion Issues Associated with the Leading
Edge of Wind Turbine Blades. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 46 (2013)
5. Chen, J., Wang, J., Ni, A.: A review on rain erosion protection of wind turbine blades. Jour-
nal of Coatings Technology and Research 16, 15–24 (2018)
6. Cortes, E., Sanchez, F., O’Carroll, A., Madramany, B., Hardiman, M., Young, T.M.: On the
Material Characterisation of Wind Turbine Blade Coatings: The Effect of Interphase Coat-
ing-Laminate Adhesion on Rain Erosion Performance. Materials 10, 1146 (2017)
7. Cook, S.S.: Erosion by Water-Hammer. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,
Physical and Engineering Sciences 119 (1928)
8. Mann, B.S., Arya, V.: An experimental study to correlate water jet impingement erosion
resistance and properties of metallic materials and coatings. Wear 253 (2002)
9. Tobin, E.F., Rohr, O., Raps, D., Willemse, W., Norman, P., Young, T.M.: Surface topogra-
phy parameters as a correlation factor for liquid droplet erosion test facilities. Wear 328–
329 (2015)
10. O’Carroll, A., Hardiman, M., Tobin, E.F., Young, T.M.: Correlation of the rain erosion per-
formance of polymers to mechanical and surface properties measured using nanoindenta-
tion. Wear 412–413, 38–48 (2018)
11. Young, T.M., Tobin, E.: Rain erosion testing of composite materials: the design of a labor-
atory test facility. 3rd International Supply Wings Conference, Frankfurt, Germany: (2008)
12. Engel, O.G.: Mechanism of Rain Erosion Part 2: A Critical Review of Erosion by Water
Drop Impact. Nation Bureau of Standards (1953)
13. Bourne, N.K., Obara, T., Field, J.E.: The Impact and Penetration of a Water Surface by a
Liquid Jet. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering
Sciences 452 (1996)
14. Adler, W.F.: Influence of water drop distortion on impact damage. Proceedings of the Sixth
Symposium on Electromagnetic Wind, Atlanta (1982)
15. Schmitt Jr, G.F.: Flight Test-Whirling Arm Correlation of Rain Erosion Resistance of Ma-
terials
16. ASTM G73 – 10: Standard Test Method for Liquid Impingement Erosion Using Rotating
Apparatus. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2017)
17. ASTM, D3039 / D3039M-17: Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix
composite materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2017)
18. ASTM D3479 / D3479M – 12: Standard Test Method for Tension-Tension Fatigue of Pol-
ymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
(2017)
Cite this paper as:
Finnegan W., Flanagan T., Goggins J. (2020) Development of a Novel Solution for
Leading Edge Erosion on Offshore Wind Turbine Blades. In: Wahab M. (eds) Proceed-
ings of the 13th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures. Lecture
Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
981-13-8331-1_3
13
19. Lawrence, K. L.: ANSYS workbench tutorial release 14. SDC publications (2012)
20. Finnegan, W., Fagan, E., Flanagan, T., Doyle, A., Goggins, J.: Operational fatigue loadings
on tidal turbine blades using computational fluid dynamics, Renewable Energy (Under Re-
view).
21. Fagan, E.: Design of fibre-reinforced polymer composite blades for wind and tidal turbines.
National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland (2017)
22. Finnegan, W., Goggins, J.: Linear irregular wave generation in a numerical wave tank. Ap-
plied Ocean Research 52, 188-200 (2015)
23. DNV-DS-J102: Design and manufacture of wind turbine blades, offshore and onshore wind
turbines. DNV GL Standard (2010)
24. IEC 61400-23:2014: Full-scale structural testing of rotor blades. Wind turbines, Interna-
tional Electrotechnical Commission Part 23 (2014)
25. DNVGL-CP-0424: Coatings for protection of FRP structures with heavy rain erosion loads.
DNV GL Standard (2016)
26. Astariz, S., Vazquez, A., Iglesias, G.: Evaluation and comparison of the levelized cost of
tidal, wave, and offshore wind energy. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 7
(2015)
27. UN Sustainable Development Goals, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org, last accessed
2019/03/01