Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vassos Karageorghis
Archaeological Research Unit, Univ. of Cyprus, P.O.Box 537, CY1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
Nota Kourou
Department of Archaeology, University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece
Eleni Aloupi
THETIS Hellas Ltd, 41 M.Moussourou St., 11636 Athens, Greece, E-mail: thetis@netor.gr
1 Introduction
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how already known scientific techniques are
being applied in Cypriote archaeology today and how "traditional" archaeologists
are collaborating with scientists in resolving specific problems which traditional
methods have not been able to resolve.
New technology was applied in Cypriote archaeology already in the 1950's,
when carbon-14 analysis helped to date correctly the Cypriote Neolithic period
to the 7th and 8th millennia BC whereas it was hitherto dated by traditional
methods to the 4th millennium BC. Apart from the C-14 technique which was
introduced by Libby in the late 1940's, there are now other methods for dating
(e.g. thermoluminescence, potassium-argon dating, fission tracks, EPR dating
etc.) which have been used extensively in archaeological research to the extent
that they constitute the scientific core of a quantitative discipline which in some
quarters has been called Archaeometry. On the other hand, after the 1960's we
have witnessed the emergence of a new systematic multidisciplinary approach to
archaeological issues. This approach is to be distinguished from archaeometry
in the sense that the members of the multidisciplinary team (i.e. the chemist,
physicist, geologist, oceanographer, botanist, palinologist, geologist etc.) come
together for a specific project. This multidisciplinary approach has been
adopted mainly in cases where there are difficulties in the interpretation of the
archaeological material with traditional methods, mainly in prehistoric
archaeology. In contrast, the traditional archaeologist deals with such a wealth
4
The ceramics in the Cyprus Museum in Nicosia provide a complete and
comprehensive archaeological collection for the study which spans more than
40 centuries from Neolithic to Hellenistic times. Due to the nature and wealth
of the material, the first step of the project consisted of an in situ survey using
non-destructive analytical techniques, in conjunction with digital recording of
visual information (digital camera, 3-D image recording system). Recent
developments in X-ray detection have led to high resolution compact, portable
and low cost instruments operating at room temperatures. The use of this new
technology offers new possibilities for a conventional analytical technique such
as X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and has made this survey possible.
An early, practically on line result of the survey was that no further evidence
for the use of cinnabar in red pigment was found in the Cyprus Museum
collection of all figurines on which the red paint was still preserved. The X -ray
analytical data showed that the red pigment was an iron rich material obviously
obtained by the use of ochre. A collection of 43 figurines was examined in less
than two hours. This illustrates the power of new technology in a case where
the archaeological question is very specific. In view of these results it is
probably safe to conclude that the presence of mercury sulphide (i.e. cinnabar)
in the single figurine in the Louvre Museum must be attributed to post
excavation retouching.
The XRF analysis of 75 ceramic artefacts revealed the alternate use of the
two different techniques for the production of black colour (figures 3a, b) which
are known as manganese black and iron reduction techniques. This interplay
between Mn - rich and Fe - based black indicates the use of very different
5
4,--------------- 4 r-------------~
Si Ca (a)
o 2 468 10 o 2 4 6 8 10
X-ray Energy(keV) X-ray Energy(keV)
4r--------------~
Sif. (b~l Ca
(e)
AI 3
Fe
o I--_~~__,__L.!..jn..,_IIL,.J
o 2 4 6 8 10 o 2 4 6 8 10
X-ray Energy(keV) X-ray Energy(keV)
4 --------------, 4 ,--------------,
I Si Ca (c)
Ca
(f)
3
Fe
Ti
Mn Zn
Or---~--~--~--~_J!L_!!..._
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 o 2 4 6 8 10
X-ray Energy(keV) X-ray Eneroy(keV)
Fig. 2. Typical X-ray spectra obtained by PIXE analysis of Cypriote terracotta figurines from
the Louvre Collection. The thick line corresponds to the painted areas and the thin line to the
body. Relevant elements detected are underlined: (a) Mn-black, umber, (b) white, Ca and P
(pulverised bone?), (c) Hg-rich red, cinnabar, (d) Fe-rich red, ochre, (e) green, green earth, (t)
bluish-green, Zn based pigment (smisthonite?)
6
firing which consequently point to different technological traditions. The latter,
seen in the context of the different ethnic origin of the various potters (native
Cypriots, Cretans, Myceneans, Syrians, Phoenicians) during several periods,
may suggest either the introduction of new production techniques or the
resistance of local tradition to external influence.
10 5 r---------------------------------------------------,
Feka (a)
~
§ 1.99 3.99 5 99
o 104~-------------------------------------------------,
U FeKa
Fig. 3. Typical XRF spectra of the dark paint decoration of two ceramic objects that
follow the White Slip I and II styles, respectively. (a) Mn-rich black pigment,
(b) Fe-based black produced by the iron reduction technique.
Following this initial survey which shed light on the surface decoration
techniques and materials used, certain categories of the Cyprus Museum
collection (i.e. White slip pottery, local imitations of Mycenean, Protowhite
painted, Protobichrome, early Geometric, Cypro-Archaic and Cypro-Classical)
will be studied in more detail by applying destructive techniques, mainly
Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive Microanalysis
equipment (SEM/EDX) , petrographic analysis, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and
Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) on ceramic sherds specifically sampled to
match the characteristics of the most interesting exhibits. Special attention was
given to the selection of ceramic samples in collaboration with the
archaeologists. The above methodology, based on the application of several
analytical techniques, will be supplemented by reproduction experiments under
laboratory conditions.
7
Throughout the project, the management and processing of the large body of
data consisting of analytical, visual and archaeological information will make
use of digital techniques in conjunction with the low cost data storage capacity
of personal computers and compact discs. Special emphasis has been given to
the synthesis of the research team in order to complement one another. For this
reason, a chemist specialising in archaeological ceramics, two physicists, a
geologist, a petrologist, and a computer scientist were brought together with
two archaeologists [5] as well as a ceramic artisan who, by the end of the
study, will replicate some representative artefacts by following the ancient
manufacturing techniques which will be elucidated through this project.
References
E. Aloupi, Nature and Micromorphology of Paint Layers on Ancient Ceramics. A New
Approach to the Study ofAncient Ceramic Technology (Ioannina,1994; ISBN 960-90007-0-3)
2 E. Aloupi and D. McArthur in The Coroplastic Art of Ancient Cyprus, Vol IV (A.G.
Leventis Foundation, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, 1995)
3 Jones, R.E., Greek and Cypriot pottery, 798-805. The British School at Athens, Fitch
Laboratory Occasional Paper 1, Athens, (1986)
4 Svardh, A., Analysis of pigments in painted terracottas in G. Ikosi, "Kythrea Temenos.
Unpublished Material from the Swedish Cyprus Expedition,» Medelhavsmuseet Bull. 28,
42-49. 1993
5 E. Aloupi, A. Karydas, P. Kokkinias, D. Loukas, T. Paradellis, A. Lekka, and V.
Karageorghis, in Proceedings of the 3m Symposium on Archaeometry of the GSA, (The Greek
Society for Archaeometry, Athens, forthcoming)