‘Workplace Solutions
Choosing a fall
arrest system
QUESTION: What are the advantages and disadvan-
tages of overhead rigid rail systems compared with
those of overhead cable-based systems?
Responding is Kevin Kelpe, continuing education manager for
Diversified Fall Protection, Westlake, OH.
ANSWER: Applying the Hierarchy of Controls is the
best way to address fall hazards. The first ~ and most
effective ~ step is to eliminate the possibility of a fall
whenever possible. After that, the next best option is
installing passive fall protection or work restraints
If we cant eliminate hazards or use passive systems,
and an active system is required, we should consider a
travel restraint system that prevents users from reach-
ing hazards entirely. Of course, some work requirements
expose users to falls as a necessity and, in these cases, an
active fall arrest system is required.
If you determine that you need a fall arrest system,
overhead rigid rail systems and overhead cable-based
systems are two available options. However, both types
of systems have their pros and cons to consider before
making a final decision, We've compared cable-based
systems with rigid rail systems on seven key attributes:
1. Fall clearance
Overhead cable-based systems must be designed to
account for additional fall clearance. The cable used in
these systemsis flexible and deflects (sags) when a load is,
applied. This additional fall clearance can be several feet.
Advantage: Overhead rigid rail systems
2. After a fall
Aller a fall, overhead cable systems must be taken out of
service and recertified by a qualified person before reuse.
‘This processis timely, decreases productivity and can cost
thousands of dollars. Overhead rigid rail systems can be
back in service quickly after an inspection by a qualified
person to determine that the system is working correctly.
Advantage: Overhead rigid rail systems
3. Cost of installation
Overhead rigid rail systems require the installation of
‘beams and posts, which carry a higher initial cost than
cable-based systems,
Advantage: Overhead cable-based systems
78 Safety+Health | August 2022
4, Ongoing maintenance
Overhead rigid rail systems last decades and require
little maintenance. In contrast, overhead cable-based
systems sustain more wear and tear and require ongoing
maintenance and component replacement.
Advantage: Overhead rigid rail systems
5, System configuration
Youcan configure cable-based systems in many different
layouts, including around corners. Although rigid rail
systems arent as flexible as cable-based systems, theyre
still customizable, and newer technologies are improv-
ing their ability to turn corners easily.
Advantage: Draw
6. Number of users
Rigid rail systems can accommodate multiple users,
while cable-based systems are generally limited to two
to three users, based on the system design.
Advantage: Overhead rigid rail systems
7. Functionality
Cable systems require intermediate supporting con-
nections, creating @ hang-up as the user moves along
the system. Although traveler and intermediate bracket
designs that significantly reduce this hang-up are avail-
able, its still annoying to most users. Rigid rail systems
eliminate the need for intermediate brackets and pro-
vide continuous mobility throughout the system.
Advantage: Overhead rigid rail systems
Final verdict
Both overhead rigid rail systems and cable-based fall
arrest systems are OSHA-compliant, but rigid rail sys-
toms are the clear winner. S*#
Editor's Note: These articles represent the independent siews ofthe
‘authors and should not be construed as National Safety Counell
endorsements
safetyandhealthmagazine.com