Opposition Paper:

This opposition is done on Trends in Warehousing written by Clémence Cape, Hugo Bechet,
Adrian Farkas and Edoardo Genissel

Opposition paper from Group 2 by Daniel Kramer, Lauritz Hager, Christof Schwammenhöfer
and Lukas Breinesberger

Requirement:
1. Complete this table!
Yes No

1a Purpose is obvious: x

1b Problem is obvious x

2 The author/s present the theoretical framework x

3 The author/s show knowledge of the chosen method x

benefits and inadequacies

4 Empiric is presented in an understandable manner x

5 Analysis has included? x

6 Conclusions/recommendations are be clearly presented, and x

have a bearing on the research

7 There is a natural connection between the problem-purpose- x

frame of reference, methodology-analysis-conclusion

8 Are there any formal problems with the paper (eg language, x
arrangement, neatness, references…)

9 The number of pages reflects by the number of people in x

your group. EG 20 pages 5 people=no. But if quality
extremely high yes.

1
10 Has the paper has been a value to the topic researched? x

11 Is Abstract included (with Keywords) x

12 Has the paper used examples from real life, and related how x
these companies deal with the topic discussed

2
 2. Describe and discuss what was good with the paper

The paper we have to analyse deals with the issue “trends in warehousing” and offers a
comprehensive analysis of the supply chain management landscape. It focuses on the
integration of digital technologies and sustainable practices in warehousing. The paper's
content is well-structured, presenting a clear and logical progression of ideas. The
introduction effectively sets the start for the discussion. It highlights the significance of SCM
in the global economy and the impending technological revolution. Highlighting the
transformation of not only warehousing but supply chain management as a whole further
contributes to the good structure of the paper. Furthermore, the paper establishes a strong
foundation for the following analysis by clearly articulating the objectives and scope.

One of the paper's strengths is its thorough literature search, which covers major academic
databases and industry reports. This approach ensures that the presented information is well-
researched and draws from a diverse range of credible sources. Practical examples from
industry leaders such as Prologis, Amazon, and Walmart, as well as references to reports like
the European Green Deal and the 2019 Accenture study, add validity and relevance to the
discussion.

The paper effectively addresses two main dimensions: digital technologies in warehousing
and sustainable warehousing practices. The text presents a structured framework for analysis,
with each dimension divided into subtopics. Figures and references are included to enhance
clarity and credibility, allowing readers to access supporting information easily.

The paper follows a logical flow, moving from the introduction to the methodology,
theory/frame of reference, results/empirics, discussions, and conclusion. This structure allows
for a logical exploration of the chosen topics and facilitates a consistent presentation of the
findings.

The paper acknowledges its limitations, including time constraints and challenges in
accessing information. This demonstrates a thoughtful reflection on the research process and
adds transparency to the study's scope and boundaries.

The paper effectively combines theoretical insights with real-world examples. It provides a
comprehensive overview of the current state and prospects of digital technologies and
sustainable practices in warehousing. The literature review is detailed, and the content is well-

3
organized. Practical examples are included, which collectively contribute to the strength of
the paper.

3. Describe and discuss what can and or should be improved with the paper

The paper "Warehouse automation and sustainability" by Group 15 is a well done and
comprehensive analysis of the evolving landscape of warehousing practices. Due to its high
quality and depth, it is difficult to identify significant negative aspects of the paper. The
paper effectively addresses the adoption of digital technologies and sustainable practices in
supply chain management and provides valuable insights into the benefits and challenges
associated with these advances. The theoretical framework is well developed, and the paper
maintains a logical link between its elements. The empirical findings are clearly presented,
and the analysis of trends and challenges is robust. The conclusions and recommendations
are clear and well supported by the research. The paper effectively uses real-life examples
from industry leaders, which enhances the practical relevance of the research.

Although the paper could benefit from more specific research questions and hypotheses,
this does not significantly affect its overall quality. In conclusion, the paper is a valuable
contribution to the understanding of digital transformation and sustainable practices in
warehouse and supply chain management, and its high quality makes it difficult to identify
any significant negative aspects.

4
 4. What grade (ECTS) Swedish A_F you would give the paper based on the
requirements for the paper? Please explain your reasoning!

Based on all requirements for the paper and after reading everything we have found nothing
which could have an impact on a grade worse than A. But to explain why we have chosen
grade A we want to break down every requirement from the table.

The purpose and problem are clearly stated, and Group 15 have presented a theoretical
framework, supported by references to academic studies and industry reports.

The methodology is acknowledged, including limitations, and the empirical findings are
presented in an understandable manner.

The analysis is included, covering the implications of technology adoption, economic

dimensions, and sustainability practices in warehousing operations.

The conclusions and recommendations are clearly presented, offering valuable insights into
the benefits and challenges associated with digital technologies and sustainable practices in
warehousing.

Also, in case of the natural connection between the problem, purpose, frame of reference,
methodology, analysis, and conclusion, we think they have written it understandable with
good structure.

They surely included a table of contents, which gives a good overview of the paper.