Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Critique 0.1

    Uploaded by

    Desiree Saldivar Bueno
    3 views1 page
    The study aimed to provide health education programs to address ignorance and judgment about HIV by administering programs to LGBTQIA+++ respondents. However, choosing only those individuals prone to HIV could result in biased responses, so a broader sample including those not prone to HIV would have been better. The author effectively used statistics to prove their point and fully cited references.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The study aimed to provide health education programs to address ignorance and judgment about HIV by administering programs to LGBTQIA+++ respondents. However, choosing only those individuals prone to HIV could result in biased responses, so a broader sample including those not prone to HIV would have been better. The author effectively used statistics to prove their point and fully cited references.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Critique 0.1

    Uploaded by

    Desiree Saldivar Bueno
    The study aimed to provide health education programs to address ignorance and judgment about HIV by administering programs to LGBTQIA+++ respondents. However, choosing only those individuals prone to HIV could result in biased responses, so a broader sample including those not prone to HIV would have been better. The author effectively used statistics to prove their point and fully cited references.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    The main point of the study was to administer appropriate health education and awareness programs for

    individuals’ ignorance and judgment of other people having a certain disease particularly a person with
    an HIV disease. Their chosen respondents which are LGBTQIA+++ were just right, however, suggesting
    that they should have chosen those individuals who are not prone to HIV for not having a biased
    response. The author used many statistics, but it does prove his point, also never failed to acknowledge
    the reference or the source.

    You might also like