Struggling to write your thesis on Gordon Wood's perspective on the American Revolution?

You're
not alone. Crafting a thesis that effectively explores and analyzes Wood's complex arguments and
historical interpretations can be a daunting task. From meticulously researching primary sources to
structuring your arguments cohesively, the process demands time, effort, and expertise.

Writing a thesis requires not only a deep understanding of the subject matter but also proficient
academic writing skills. It entails formulating a clear and compelling thesis statement, conducting
thorough research to support your claims, and presenting your analysis in a coherent manner.

For many students, the demands of academic life, coupled with other responsibilities, make it
challenging to dedicate the necessary time and energy to produce a high-quality thesis. That's where
⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ comes in.
At ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, we specialize in providing expert assistance to students grappling with
complex academic assignments. Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in Gordon Wood's
work and the intricacies of the American Revolution. Whether you need help refining your thesis
statement, conducting research, or polishing your writing, we've got you covered.

By entrusting your thesis to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can rest assured that you'll receive a well-
researched, meticulously crafted paper that meets the highest academic standards. We understand the
importance of deadlines and strive to deliver your completed thesis promptly, allowing you ample
time for review and revisions.

Don't let the challenges of writing a thesis hold you back. Take the first step towards academic
success by ordering from ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ today. With our professional assistance, you can
tackle even the most daunting assignments with confidence.
During the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln looked back to it to define the significance of the conflict
and to restate the ideals and aspirations of our country. And so, let me ask you this to lay out that
argument. And he says, “No, we're going to relocate sovereignty. Want it Create your account in
moments and select Zip at checkout. In this essay, Wood explains the transformation of the ruling
class from a quasi-aristocracy to one in which many more common men began to participate. What I
liked about the book is that it has encouraged me to read more about the era. By 1808, Pennsylvania
was electing Simon Snyder as President, as governor who had no education whatsoever.
Williamsburg, Virginia: Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture; University of
North Carolina Press. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a
certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. Now some of them, Massachusetts
delays its constitution making until 1780. This rebellion is traced by Wood through its progressions in
taxation, armed rebellion, and finally the establishment of American government with the US
Constitution. It isn't about the Revolutionary War (although the war is part of it). The noblest ideals
and aspirations of Americans - their commitments to freedom, constitutionalism, the well-being of
ordinary people, and equality, especially equality - came out of the Revolutionary era. It discusses
the events of the Revolution and more importantly the progress and the evolution of the thinking that
produced the Revolution and the Constitution that followed. So, it's not good. You're not going to
find too much democracy anywhere in the world in the 18th century. Author and Professor Brion
McClanahan shows how patriots like Franklin, Madison, and Hamilton laid the foundations of
American civil liberty and had a better understanding of the problems facing us today than our
current Congress. And so, they have excessive slaves and they beginning to rent them out in the
cities, in Norfolk or Richmond. Wood succeeds in his attempt by creating a fascinating tapestry of
these Characters’ characters. As long as the United States exists, those documents will be studied and
used. The Senates have no constituents, and the governors are not representatives at all. Lincoln saw
as well that the Revolution had convinced Americans that they were a special people with a special
destiny to lead the world toward liberty. In so doing, it greatly illuminates the origins of the present
American political system. He knew that the Revolution not only had legally created the United
States, but also had produced all of the great hopes and values of the American people. The book is
recommended in the highest way. 2 likes Like Comment Paul 24 reviews 1 follower October 9, 2009
I was looking for a brief overview of the American Revolution, and I found it. And so, they have to
turn to wheat, and the growing of wheat doesn't require the kind of labor that tobacco did. From this
colonial revolt sprouted ideals of liberty and democracy, and all the aspirations and ambitions of a
new people. So that peculiar notion of Massachusetts, which I don't know much about, I don't think
it's exercised too often, but I remember someone telling me about it and that it's something that's not
typical of the United States as a whole. The unusual thing about the American Revolution, is that
both sides were choosing between two different types of traditionalism, and were forced to fight a
contemporary battle among issues that had divided English speaking peoples since early Norman
times, over 600 years in the past. Here he discusses the intense nationwide debate on the ratification
of the Constitution, stressing the continuities between that struggle over the foundations of the
national government and the original principles of the Revolution. He writes frequently for The New
York Review of Books and The New Republic.
Loyalists (Tories). Colonists who chose to side with the British Did not think unfair taxes were a
good reason for rebellion. Lincoln saw as well that the Revolution had convinced Americans that
they were a special people with a special destiny to lead the world toward liberty. From 1750 to 1770
the population doubled from 1 million to two and doubled again in the next twenty years. In time,
the principles of 1776 inextricably lead to legalizing abortion and transgenderism. We still grapple
with the issues of state sovereignty versus federal authority, and with a class system that seems to
dominate elected offices. Wood presents a summary of the causes of the Revolution -- a topic
difficult and fascinating in itself. As such, he aimed at a much broader audience than did the others,
one encompassing the middling class of artisans, tradesmen, and tavern-goers. I picked up this book
thinking, as it's title depicts 'A History' of the American Revolution not a book personal opinion of
the revolution All seriousness this book is the stereotypical mentality of American patriotism that
most non America's despise. In the short compass of the study, Wood offers his own interpretation of
the importance of the Revolution. No doubt the story is a dramatic Thirteen insignificant colonies
three thousand miles from the centers of Western civilization fought off British rule to become, in
fewer than three decades, a huge, sprawling, rambunctious republic of nearly four million citizens.
Wood does a wonderful job if explaining how a struggle between 13 of Britain's 21 North American
colonies was virtually inevitable due to many circumstances that were surely incomprehensible at
first, and to hard to untangle afterwards when the issues were of the present day, until all at once,
individuals who would rather not, were forced to choose sides. Hamilton, the big-business man and
big-government man, fought to tie the two together, and in doing so became the man who made
modern America. Slavery had been taken for granted so much through all of history, up to that point.
More substantively, Paine’s aggressive anti-royalism marked a major turn in the debate. Englishman
Thomas Paine had been resident in the colonies for only fourteen months when he wrote Common
Sense, the most influential expression of the “American” position, while Massachusetts Governor
Thomas Hutchinson, who in two pamphlets gathered here presents the “British” position as
forcefully as any writer, had deep ancestral roots in the Bay Colony. Timeline The American
Revolution was one of the most significant events in world history: For it to take place a lot of
things had to add up to trigger the war. It also inspired me to read some of Thomas Paine's works.
Recommended for those who know little or nothing about this period in American history. I thought
I understood the essence of the American Revolution, but I was wrong. It's almost as if you could
underline every sentence because each has so much to offer. Instead, our system considers things like
how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It's about all the revolutions
in government, economics, culture, and society that we ordinary folk clump together and misinterpret
when we refer to the American Revolution. Wood notes that unlike the other founders, Franklin
already had an international reputation as a scientist, frequently considered permanently relocating to
Europe and bragged of his connections to the imperial government. Wood is quick to note that
although the Federalists did get their way in some of the reforms, ultimately it was the Anti-
Federalists who came to dominate American politics in the following generation. His basic premise is
that these men were revolutionaries that fought themselves out of a job. Some historians argue that
the Revolution was solely a colonial rebellion aimed at achieving only the limited goal of
independence from Britain. The Revolution, in short, gave birth to whatever sense of nationhood and
national purpose Americans have had. What sets this book, at less than a 170 pages, is its conciseness
and ability to sum up many and large complicated issues well. I highly recommend it! Five stars. 2
likes Like Comment Brian Willis 602 reviews 37 followers December 26, 2016 This the deepest
concise version of the American Revolution out there, not simply a rehashing of the facts but rather a
profound analysis of the reasons and the causes and the effects of the colonial rebellion. He knew
that the Revolution not only had legally created the United States, but also had produced all of the
great hopes and values of the American people.
I thought it was refreshing to see an overview of Thomas Paine included in this book as he is often
overlooked. So, in that sense, yes, if that's what is meant by consensus, but at the same time, I
believe the society, the American Revolution was a social revolution. Dickinson sincerely believed
that America’s breaking free of England would lead to America’s bleeding from every vein. From
that frame of reference, of a new American nation, built with the best of British hopes of tradition,
law and religion is how Wood has framed the story of the American Revolution. Others navigated
the new political landscape to sell the idea of federalism to self interested provincial state
governments. In summary, this book is fine for what it is; it's just that it doesn't have many points of
interest. And he's the one who called attention to an earlier book I'd written about this distinction.
One of the worst book I have read, given that I have already read many books on the topics. Woods
sticks most closely to conventional Founding-Father writing in his opening chapter on Washington,
but Washington forces the author’s hand by consciously playing the part of the noble, disinterested
leader, and avoiding anything that diminish the icon he was creating of himself. This is a thorough
non-controversial, conventional overview of the American Revolution. There were revolutions in
transport, communication and work; cities grew vast; and scientific ideas made the intellectual
landscape unrecognisable. Nevertheless, I’m always able to find interesting nuggets of hitherto
unknown (to me, at least) information even from a survey. Rather than merely sticking to farming,
American farmers dabbled in all sorts of activities on the side and thus became richer and richer. In
fact, as one of those Founders, David Ramsay of South Carolina, put it, equality was the very “life
and soul” of republicanism. Despite the tough hand he was dealt when he started out in life, Lincoln
was able to rise to greatness in America by way of his own unique talents, his perseverance and spirit,
and his own resolution to succeed. Speaking as someone whose elementary, middle, and high
schools covered it mostly on a military and mythic level - with the historiography stalled out
somewhere in the 19th century - the book did an amazing job of illustrating the true variety of causes
and contexts that this seminal event held. More or less. Each focusing on a different revolutionary
leader from George Washington to Thomas Paine and their characters. It's the American Revolution
that makes history, that makes slavery a problem and puts it on the defensive. The essays are
sandwiched between an introduction and an epilogue which bind the essays together. The following
chapters are, at the same time, self contained biographies. But, either history books just aren't as
great as biographies, or this book was sort of total crap. I learned more than I care to admit.;-) 4 likes
Like Comment Jenni Lithgow 30 reviews 3 followers December 22, 2008 I should preface this
review by saying, the only history books I read are biographies. Wood only spends 14 whole pages
on direct discussion on the military conflict proper, though a reader will not come away with
misunderstandings about how the conflict developed or why it was concluded the way it was. It
starts as a debate over representation, but then with sovereignty going to be, and the British are not
going to give way on that, Parliament has to be sovereign as far as they're concerned. As Lincoln put
it, his life was a testimony to the ideals that America strived to uphold: human equality, freedom, and
opportunity; ideals that had to be preserved and fully lived up to by winning the Civil War and
abolishing slavery. But today, we're here to talk about his newest book, Power and Liberty:
Constitutionalism in the American Republic. This makes it easier to listen to and makes clearer just
what a contribution this book is to the history of libertarian literature. That it succeeds in such a
profound and enthralling way is a tribute to Gordon Wood's mastery of his subject, and of the
historian's craft. Our noblest ideals and aspirations-our commitments to freedom, constitutionalism,
the well-being of ordinary people, and equality-came out of the Revolutionary era. They throw off
one tyrant to find themselves under a new tyranny.
The life of each; Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Franklin, Hamilton, Madison, Paine is presented
individually as well as collectively, but the thread that binds these portraits together is the idea of
character as a lived reality. The portraits drawn are interesting and much can be earned when
compared with one's own understandings and those of other writers. Of course, as an abridged
amalgamation of some of Wood's other works, it is lacking in some detail. These are the questions
this short history seeks to answer. There is a lot here which was new, fresh, and valuable. First
published in 1948, its elegance, passion, and iconoclastic erudition laid the groundwork for a totally
new understanding of the American past. An overview of the philosophical underpinnings of The
Revolution? Yes. In fact, the actual Revolution takes up only a small portion of the book. Read
instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web. He tries to juxtapose all of that political theory from
England, Scotland, France, and even Italy onto the thinking, motivation, and rationale that the
patriots had for causing a revolution. Gordon Wood is Professor of History at Brown University. I
have both the audio and paperback versions of this book. A common lament since the days of the
founding fathers has been ?Where have such leaders gone. This makes it easier to listen to and makes
clearer just what a contribution this book is to the history of libertarian literature. Can you kind of set
out your basic argument there. It grew out of a series of lectures that I gave at Northwestern Law
School on the founding, on the constitutional aspects of the founding. The rest is telling what lead to
the war, what life was like for those who lived in the soon-to-be United States at the time, and how
the Revolution changed the politics, economy, and daily life of Americans, and how it affected the
world at large. Wood's history of the American Revolution is a general analysis of the revolution, its
causes, and outcomes. The book will allow the reader to think through for him or herself the meaning
of our Revolution and to explore further through additional reading as indicated in the bibliography.
Recommended for those who know little or nothing about this period in American history. Kennedy
to Joe Biden, and eight Federal Reserve chairs, from William McChesney Martin to Jerome Powell,
this is an insider's story of macroeconomic policy that hasn't been told before—one that is a pleasure
to listen to, and as interesting as it is important. Did not know what to expect from such a short
volume on such a broad subject, but I was overwhelmed by the depth of analysis and interpretation
given by Professor Wood. The central engine of the book is based in the ideas, particularly of the
Enlightenment, that drove the Revolution. The reader gets a good history of the Revolution
following the French and Indian War all the way through the ratification of the Constitution of the
United States. Washington is framed as the ideal gentleman and hyper concerned with his reputation
(at least in modern eyes). All their virtues and faults were discussed as well as their contributions for
good or for ill. 1st read: Summer 2015 2nd read: Summer 2016 driven2teach grad-school
history.more 2 likes Like Comment James 54 reviews 5 followers May 31, 2017 Beautifully written,
and a useful one-stop for those who already know some revolutionary war history to gain deeper
insight into the unique legacy and true character of the major founders. Wood discusses the character
and consequences of the revolution, grounding the events and ideas that shaped the American
consciousness. It is a complicated and at times ironic story that needs to be explained and
understood, not blindly celebrated or condemned. America had readily available land and far fewer
tenant farmers, which predominated in England under the control of the aristocracy. The book is
recommended in the highest way. 2 likes Like Comment Paul 24 reviews 1 follower October 9, 2009
I was looking for a brief overview of the American Revolution, and I found it.
I think Wood did a very good job at explaining the different ways as to how the revolution occurred
and why we are still the America we are today. In Founding Partisans, master historian H. W. Brands
has crafted a fresh and lively narrative of the early years of the republic as the Founding Fathers
fought one another with competing visions of what our nation would be. But this Imperial debate,
when those who would become later known as the founders of the United States of America, had to
figure out what their argument actually would be. As the book notes, Washington drew world-wide
acclaim and wonder for stepping down and returning to his plantation at the end of his presidency.
Gordon Wood is a conservative in the classic sense, and it is his insightful essay on the decline of the
intellectual of leadership of great men (and the rise of the unthinking masses) which I found most
original and a little saddening. Wood explains, republicanism, a political philosophy in which the
power of government rests in the hands of the people, was the ideology that fueled the American
Revolution. It's sent me back to the bookshelf for another round of reading. Wood quotes a British
traveler in America from 1759 who writes of the American urgency to rise to the point where the
American British reached their destiny to write the laws of the rest of civilization. Mr. Wood spoke
about 40 of these works, with topics ranging from taxation without representation to natural rights.
close. These are the questions this short history seeks to answer. One of the worst book I have read,
given that I have already read many books on the topics. During the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln
looked back to it to define the significance of the conflict and to restate the ideals and aspirations of
our country. In this post-Hamilton world, people seem to know a lot more about our founding fathers
as real people, not just faces on coins and textbooks. The question is, then,was the Revolution
revolutionary, or was it not. Nothing much original that hasn’t been written before. 2 likes Like
Comment Dan 495 reviews 43 followers August 8, 2020 This is a short, solid review of the
American Revolution. Wood is quick to note that although the Federalists did get their way in some
of the reforms, ultimately it was the Anti-Federalists who came to dominate American politics in the
following generation. But the history of the American Revolution, like the history of the nation as a
whole, ought not to be viewed simply as a story of right and wrong from which moral lessons are to
be drawn. Nevertheless I kept at it and if nothing more it has proven that I am woefully ignorant
when it comes to things I probably ought to know about how our country was founded. Britain
believes colonists should help pay for war. It's the only society in the world at the time that celebrates
work. Get your order without delay Your order will be shipped as normal. But the history of the
American Revolution, like the history of the nation as a whole, ought not to be viewed simply as a
story of right and wrong from which moral lessons are to be drawn. All Americans are indebted to
him for setting high standards on day one. So, it's not good. You're not going to find too much
democracy anywhere in the world in the 18th century. Please include what you were doing when this
page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. The First Continental
Congress - Many colonists felt that the closing of the Boston Harbor was the final insult in a long
list of abuses. After Shays' rebellion and the period of time when state governments became corrupt
in ways, the general consensus of lawmakers was to drastically change the Articles of Confederation,
scrapping it, and outline their plan of republican government. Now, of course, historians are indicting
us for not having done anything about slavery in the south. And you point out something again, that
is just really, really important, and I think often missed. These are the questions this short history
seeks to answer.